Back to GetFilings.com




FORM 10-Q
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549

(Mark one)
x
 
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
 
   
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
 

For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2004

OR

o
 
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
 
   
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 


For the transition period from
 
To
 

Commission file number   1-9109

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. 
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Florida
 
No. 59-1517485
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
     


880 Carillon Parkway, St. Petersburg, Florida 33716
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(727) 567-1000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes X No___

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes X No ___
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes of common stock, as of the close of the latest practicable date.


74,623,972 shares of Common Stock as of February 01, 2005.

 


 
   
RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
       
   
Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended December 31, 2004
 
       
   
INDEX
 
       
       
PART I.
 
FINANCIAL INFORMATION (unaudited)
PAGE
       
Item 1.
 
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2004 and September 24, 2004
3
       
   
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three months ended December 31, 2004 and December 26, 2003
4
       
   
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the three months ended December 31, 2004 and December 26, 2003
5
       
   
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
7
       
Item 2.
 
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
17
       
Item 3.
 
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
25
       
Item 4.
 
Controls and Procedures
27
       
       
       
PART II.
 
OTHER INFORMATION
 
       
Item 1.
 
Legal Proceedings
28
       
Item 2.
 
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
29
       
Item 6.
 
Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
29
       
   
Signatures
31
       
   
Certifications
32

2



RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share data)
 
December 31,
 
September 24,
 
2004
 
2004
       
ASSETS
     
Cash and cash equivalents
$ 619,617 
 
$ 528,823 
Cash and cash equivalents, segregated pursuant to federal regulations
2,810,191 
 
2,322,402 
Securities owned:
     
Trading account securities, at fair value
437,091 
 
329,861 
Available for sale securities, at fair value
200,153 
 
208,022 
Receivables:
     
Clients
2,005,109 
 
1,961,553 
Stock borrowed
1,005,978 
 
1,536,879 
Brokers, dealers and clearing organizations
220,448 
 
125,544 
Other
177,412 
 
169,577 
Property and equipment, net
123,420 
 
122,750 
Deferred income taxes, net
74,916 
 
73,559 
Deposits with clearing organizations
43,184 
 
28,466 
Goodwill
62,575 
 
62,575 
Investment in leveraged leases
19,954 
 
20,160 
Prepaid expenses and other assets
158,448 
 
131,675 
       
 
$ 7,958,496 
 
$7,621,846 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
     
Loans payable
$ 168,368 
 
$ 136,393 
Payables:
     
Clients
4,881,349 
 
4,121,713 
Stock loaned
1,064,581 
 
1,597,117 
Brokers, dealers and clearing organizations
78,362 
 
74,258 
Trade and other
192,320 
 
195,291 
Trading account securities sold but not yet purchased, at fair value
190,825 
 
122,281 
Accrued compensation, commissions and benefits
204,548 
 
256,062 
Income taxes payable
33,903 
 
32,145 
       
 
6,814,256 
 
6,535,260 
       
Minority Interests
23,756
 
21,373 
       
Shareholders' equity
     
Preferred stock; $.10 par value; authorized
     
10,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding -0- shares
 
-
Common Stock; $.01 par value; authorized
     
100,000,000 shares; issued 75,778,542 at
     
December 31, 2004 and 75,321,926 at Sept. 24, 2004
758 
 
753 
Shares exchangeable into common stock: 305,095
5,493 
 
5,493 
Additional paid-in capital
141,393 
 
127,405  
Accumulated other comprehensive income
6,567 
 
3,875 
Retained earnings
990,374 
 
957,317 
 
1,144,585 
 
1,094,843 
Less:1,430,523 and 1,761,322 common shares
     
in treasury, at cost
24,101 
 
29,630 
 
1,120,484 
 
1,065,213 
       
 
$ 7,958,496 
 
$7,621,846 
 
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.


3



RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
       
       
 
Three Months Ended
 
December 31,
 
December 26,
 
2004
 
2003
       
Revenues:
     
Securities commissions and fees
$ 357,469
 
$ 303,291
Investment banking
28,505
 
19,726
Investment advisory fees
37,452
 
31,958
Interest
54,416
 
31,156
Net trading profits
9,752
 
6,779
Financial service fees
22,410
 
18,702
Other
14,373
 
13,048
Total Revenues
524,377
 
424,660
       
Interest expense
25,392
 
10,673
Net Revenues
498,985
 
413,987
       
       
Non-Interest Expenses:
     
Compensation, commissions and benefits
348,909
 
300,660
Communications and information processing
21,199
 
19,196
Occupancy and equipment costs
16,053
 
15,293
Clearance and floor brokerage
5,466
 
5,052
Business development
14,744
 
12,943
Other
26,220
 
21,750
Total Non-Interest Expenses
432,591
 
374,894
   
 
 
 
Income before provision for income taxes and minority interests
66,394
 
39,093
       
Provision for income taxes
25,562
 
14,725
Minority interests
1,589
 
138
       
Net Income
$ 39,243
 
$ 24,230
       
Net Income per share-basic*
$ 0.53
 
$ 0.33
Net Income per share-diluted*
$ 0.52
 
$ 0.33
Weighted average common shares
     
outstanding-basic*
74,002
 
72,881
Weighted average common and common
     
equivalent shares outstanding-diluted*
75,334
 
74,111
       

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
* All common stock and per share amounts adjusted for the March 24, 2004 3-for-2 stock split.

4



RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
continued on next page
       
 
Three Months Ended
 
December 31,
 
December 26,
 
2004
 
2003
Cash Flows from operating activities:
     
Net Income
$ 39,243 
 
$ 24,230 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
     
cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
     
Depreciation and amortization
3,984 
 
3,297 
Deferred income taxes
(1,357)
 
(5,743)
Unrealized gain on not readily marketable investments
-
 
(164)
Unrealized gain and premium amortization
     
on available for sale securities
(529)
 
(494)
Ineffectiveness of interest rate swaps accounted for
     
as cash flow hedges
(3)
 
(132)
Loss (gain) on sale of property and equipment
230 
 
(4)
Provision for bad debts and other accruals
10,712 
 
7,819 
Stock and option compensation expense
3,897 
 
2,633 
Minority Interest
2,383 
 
2,333 
(Increase) decrease in operating assets:
     
Assets segregated pursuant to federal regulations
(487,789)
 
(17,979)
Receivables:
     
Clients, net
(43,560)
 
(89,696)
Stock borrowed
530,901 
 
65,018 
Brokers-dealers and clearing organizations
(94,904)
 
29,852 
Other
(7,835) 
 
6,308 
Trading securities, net
(43,945)
 
(44,839)
Prepaid expenses and other assets
(33,501)
 
(11,498)
       
Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities:
     
Payables:
     
Clients
759,636 
 
(68,561)
Stock loaned
(532,536)
 
(9,853)
Brokers-dealers and clearing organizations
4,104 
 
(66,399)
Trade and other
(13,677)
 
563 
Accrued compensation, commissions and benefits
(51,514)
 
(32,503)
Income taxes payable
1,758 
 
3,721 
       
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
45,698 
 
(202,091)
 
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements


5



RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
continued from previous page
 
Three Months Ended
 
December 31,
 
December 26,
 
2004
 
2003
       
Cash Flows from investing activities:
     
Additions to property and equipment, net
(3,388)
 
(6,721)
Sales of available for sale securities
13,312 
 
-
Purchases of available for sale securities
(19,213)
 
-
Purchases of investment account securities
 
(1,541)
Security maturations and repayments
19,119 
 
34,051 
       
Net cash provided by investing activities
9,830 
 
25,789 
       
Cash Flows from financing activities:
     
Proceeds from loans payable
35,300 
 
40,938 
Repayments on loans payable
(3,326)
 
(5,339)
Exercise of stock options and employee stock purchases
7,810 
 
3,471 
Purchase of treasury stock
(83)
 
(83)
Cash dividends on common stock
(6,186)
 
(4,415)
       
Net cash provided by financing activities
33,515 
 
34,572 
       
Currency adjustments:
     
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
1,751 
 
1,412 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
90,794 
 
(140,318)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
528,823 
 
734,631 
       
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$ 619,617 
 
$ 594,313 
       
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information
     
Cash paid for interest
$ 25,082 
 
$ 10,807 
Cash paid for taxes
$ 25,161 
 
$ 16,747 
       
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements


6



RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
December 31, 2004  

Note 1 - Basis of Presentation

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Raymond James Financial, Inc. (“RJF”) and its consolidated subsidiaries. RJF is a Florida-based holding company whose subsidiaries are engaged in various financial service businesses; as used herein, the term “the Company” refers to RJF or one or more of its subsidiaries. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain financial information that is normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") but not required for interim reporting purposes has been condensed or omitted. Pursuant to GAAP, these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect, in the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial position and results of operations for the interim periods presented. The nature of the Company's business is such that the results of any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 24, 2004. To prepare consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP, management must estimate certain amounts that affect the reported assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and reported revenues and expenses. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Certain reclassifications have been made to the condensed consolidated financial statements of the prior period to conform to the current period presentation.

The Company's quarters end on the last Friday of December, March, June and September. Three of the Company's wholly-owned subsidiaries, Raymond James Bank (“RJBank”), Raymond James Limited (“RJ Ltd.”) and Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc. (“RJ Tax Credit”) have quarters that end on the last day of each calendar quarter.

Note 2 - Effects of recently issued accounting standards

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), "Share-Based Payment" ("SFAS No. 123R"). This statement requires the recognition of the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award in its financial statements. It also requires the cost to be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award (usually the vesting period). SFAS No. 123R replaces SFAS No. 123 and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, and its related interpretations. SFAS No. 123R is effective for periods beginning after June 15, 2005 and applies to all awards granted, modified, repurchased, or cancelled after that date. The adoption of this statement will not have a material impact on its financial statements given that the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 effective September 28, 2002.

On October 13, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ratified the consensus reached by the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) on EITF issue 04-10, “Determining Whether to Aggregate Operating Segments that do not meet the Quantitative Thresholds.” The task force concluded that operating segments that do not meet the quantitative thresholds established by Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,” can be aggregated only if aggregation is consistent with the objective and basic principles of SFAS No. 131, the segments have similar economic characteristics, and the segments share a majority of the aggregation criteria listed in SFAS No. 131. This EITF becomes applicable for fiscal years ending after October 13, 2004. The adoption of this EITF will not have a material effect on the Company's disclosure.

On March 31, 2004, the FASB ratified the consensus reached by the EITF in issue 03-1, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments” on the guidance to be used in determining when an investment is considered impaired, whether that impairment is other than temporary, and the measurement of an impairment loss. This consensus ratified by the FASB on March 31, 2004 was effective for other-than-temporary impairment evaluations made in reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2004. However, the guidance contained in paragraphs 10 - - 20 of EITF 03-1, related to determining whether an impairment is other-than-temporary and measuring the related impairment loss, has been delayed by FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) EITF Issue 03-1-1, "Effective Date of Paragraphs 10 - 20 of EITF Issue No. 03-1.” The Company does not believe that the impact of adopting the provisions of paragraphs 10 - 20 of this EITF will be material to its consolidated financial statements.

7


Note 3 - Trading Account Securities Owned And Trading Account Securities Sold But Not Yet Purchased, at Fair Value:
 
 
December 31, 2004
 
September 24, 2004
     
Trading Account
     
Trading Account
     
Securities Owned
     
Securities Owned
     
Sold but
     
Sold but
 
Trading Account
 
Not yet
 
Trading Account
 
Not yet
 
Securities Owned
 
Purchased,
 
Securities Owned
 
Purchased,
 
at Fair Value
 
at Fair Value
 
at Fair Value
 
at Fair Value
               
 
(in 000's)
Marketable:
             
Equities
$ 31,441
 
$ 25,030
 
$ 33,910
 
$ 32,950
Municipal obligations
203,869
 
228
 
192,099
 
-
Corporate obligations
71,778
 
10,983
 
26,216
 
3,522
Government obligations
103,550
 
112,143
 
52,335
 
66,073
Other
20,951
 
42,441
 
17,886
 
19,736
Non-marketable
5,502
 
-
 
7,415
 
-
 
$437,091
 
$190,825
 
$329,861
 
$122,281

Note 4 - Variable Interest Entities (“VIE’s”)

Under the provisions of FASB Interpretation 46R ("FIN 46R") the Company determined that Raymond James Employee Investment Funds I and II (the “Funds”) and Comprehensive Software Systems, Inc. (“CSS”) are VIE’s. The Funds are limited partnerships, for which the Company is the general partner, that invest in the merchant banking and private equity activities of the Company and other unaffiliated venture capital limited partnerships. Both Funds were established as compensation and retention measures for certain qualified key employees of the Company. The Company makes non-recourse loans to these employees for two thirds of the purchase price per unit. The loans and applicable interest are to be repaid based solely on the earnings of the Funds. The Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary, and accordingly, consolidates the Funds, which have combined assets of approximately $10.0 million at December 31, 2004. None of those assets act as collateral for any obligations of the Funds. The Company's exposure to loss is limited to its contributions and the loans it funded to the employee investors. At December 31, 2004, that exposure is approximately $9.5 million.

CSS was formed by a group of broker-dealer firms, including the Company, to develop a back-office software system. CSS is currently funded by capital contributions and loans from its owners. CSS had assets of $4.4 million and negative net equity at December 31, 2004. The Company's exposure to loss is limited to its capital contributions and amounts loaned. The Company is not the primary beneficiary of CSS and, therefore, accounts for its investment using the equity method of accounting.

Note 5 - Stock-based Compensation

At December 31, 2004, the Company had eight stock-based employee compensation plans, which are described more fully in Note 14 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 24, 2004. The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation." For the three months ended December 31, 2004 and December 26, 2003, the Company recognized expense of $3.9 million and $2.6 million, respectively, related to its stock-based compensation plans.

8



Note 6 - Commitments and Contingencies

RJBank has outstanding at any time a significant number of commitments to extend credit. These arrangements are subject to strict credit control assessments and each client's credit worthiness is evaluated on a case-by-case basis. A summary of commitments to extend credit and letters of credit outstanding are as follows:

   
December 31, 2004
 
September 24, 2004
   
(in 000's)
         
Standby letters of credit
 
$ 8,416
 
$ 7,917
Consumer lines of credit
 
16,978
 
31,708
Commercial lines of credit
 
33,347
 
62,085
Unfunded loan commitments - variable rate
 
104,445
 
119,669
Unfunded loan commitments - fixed rate
 
4,655
 
3,755

Because many commitments expire without being funded in whole or part, the contract amounts are not estimates of future cash flows. The majority of loan commitments have terms of up to one year.

In the normal course of business, RJBank issues, or participates in the issuance of, financial standby letters of credit whereby it provides an irrevocable guarantee of payment in the event the letter of credit is drawn down by the beneficiary. As of December 31, 2004, $8.4 million of such letters of credit were outstanding. Of the letters of credit outstanding, $7.0 million are underwritten as part of a larger corporate credit relationship, and the remaining $1.4 million are fully secured by cash or securities. In the event that a letter of credit is drawn down, RJBank would pursue repayment from the account party under the existing borrowing relationship, or would liquidate collateral, or both. The proceeds from repayment or liquidation of collateral are expected to cover the maximum potential amount of any future payments of amounts drawn down under the existing letters of credit.

At December 31, 2004 and September 24, 2004, no securities were pledged by RJBank as collateral with the Federal Home Loan Bank of ("FHLB") for advances. In lieu of pledging securities for advances, RJBank provided the FHLB with a lien against RJBank's portfolio of residential mortgages.

As part of an effort to increase brand awareness, the Company entered into a stadium naming rights contract in July 1998. The contract has a thirteen-year term with a five-year renewal option and a 4% annual escalator. Expenses of $680,109 and $653,951 were recognized in the three months ended December 31, 2004 and December 26, 2003, respectively.

In the normal course of business, the Company enters into underwriting commitments. Transactions relating to such commitments that were open at December 31, 2004 and were subsequently settled had no material effect on the consolidated financial statements as of that date.

The Company utilizes client marginable securities to satisfy deposits with clearing organizations. At December 31, 2004 and September 24, 2004, the Company had client margin securities valued at $100.4 million and $90.2 million, respectively, on deposit with a clearing organization.

The Company has guaranteed lines of credit for various foreign joint ventures as follows: three lines of credit totaling $12.5 million in Turkey and one line of credit totaling $1.3 million in Argentina. At December 31, 2004, there were no outstanding balances on these lines of credit. In addition, the Company has guaranteed the completion of trades with counterparties in Turkey and Argentina not to exceed $6 million.

The Company has committed a total of $30.9 million, in amounts ranging from $200,000 to $1.5 million, to 33 different independent venture capital or private equity partnerships. As of December 31, 2004, the Company had invested $25.5 million of that amount. Additionally, the Company is the general partner in two internally sponsored private equity limited partnerships to which it has committed $14 million. Of that amount, the Company has invested $8.8 million as of December 31, 2004.

As part of a subscription agreement the Company entered into with CSS (see Note 4 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements), the Company is committed to investing an additional $3.6 million in January 2005.

In the normal course of business, certain subsidiaries of the Company act as general partner and may be contingently liable for activities of various limited partnerships. These partnerships engaged primarily in real estate activities. In the opinion of the Company, such liabilities, if any, for the obligations of the partnerships will not in the aggregate have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position.

9



The Company guarantees certain obligations of subsidiaries as follows: the guarantee of the existing mortgage debt of Raymond James & Associates, Inc. ("RJA") of $72.0 million and, the guarantee of the interest rate swap obligations of RJ Capital Services, Inc. (a maximum market exposure of $30 million). The Company has also committed to lend to or guarantee obligations of RJ Tax Credit of up to $90 million upon request. RJ Tax Credit may borrow in order to fund the purchase and development of properties qualifying for tax credits, which are then sold to third parties. This commitment is reviewed and renewed annually. The borrowings are secured by real estate properties. At December 31, 2004 there were guarantees outstanding to third parties of $10.3 million and cash funded to purchase properties of $35.8 million. In addition, at December 31, 2004, RJ Tax Credit is committed to purchase properties, subject to due diligence, totaling $51.8 million.

The Company is a defendant or co-defendant in various lawsuits and arbitrations incidental to its securities business.  Like others in the retail securities industry, the Company has experienced a significant increase in the number of claims seeking recovery due to portfolio losses.

As a result of the extensive regulation of the securities industry, the Company's broker-dealer subsidiaries are subject to regular reviews and inspections by regulatory authorities and self-regulatory organizations, which can result in the imposition of sanctions for regulatory violations, ranging from non-monetary censure to fines and, in serious cases, temporary or permanent suspension from business. In addition, from time to time regulatory agencies and self-regulatory organizations institute investigations into industry practices, which can also result in the imposition of such sanctions.

As previously reported, RJFS and the SEC staff were unable to reach a resolution regarding a proposed enforcement action alleging fraud and failure to supervise a former Financial Advisor in the RJFS Rhode Island office. On September 30, 2004, the SEC issued an order instituting public administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings pursuant to section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933, sections 15(b) and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and section 203(f) of the Investment advisor Act of 1940 against RJFS, its former President and a former branch manager.  Among other things, the SEC alleges that RJFS violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. This matter is scheduled for a hearing before an administrative law judge in February 2005.

As previously reported, the Company and RJFS are defendants in a series of lawsuits and arbitrations relating to an alleged mortgage lending program known as the "Premiere 72" program, that was administered by a company owned in part by two individuals who were registered as Financial Advisors with RJFS in Houston. The lawsuits are pending in various courts, and several of the arbitration claims relating to this matter have been settled by RJFS for amounts consistent with its evaluation of those claims. Several cases that had been removed to federal court were remanded to state court, and the plaintiffs are seeking reconsideration of that decision.

In the first arbitration to reach a hearing, claimants sought approximately $1.8 million dollars in damages plus punitive damages.  The panel entered a preliminary order requiring RJFS to pay its clients their losses through a formula, which included the assignment to RJFS of their interests in the real estate transactions, awarded claimants attorneys' fees and directed the parties to calculate the actual amount to be paid. In the order the panel denied any recovery to non-clients. The amounts due under the formula were substantially less than the claimants sought and the parties settled on terms consistent with the order. The Company does not believe that this order represents a precedent that would govern future decisions.  Arbitration proceedings for other claimants are currently scheduled through November 2006.

Although the total amount funded by participants in this lending program may exceed $150 million, the amount of actual loss of the claimants is not determinable at this time because the participants are actively attempting to realize value from the underlying real estate collateral. Based on discovery to date, the Company and RJFS believe they have strong defenses to these claims and are vigorously contesting them.

The Company is contesting the allegations in these and other matters and believes that there are meritorious defenses in each of these matters.  In view of the number and diversity of claims against the Company, the number of jurisdictions in which litigation is pending and the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of litigation and other claims, the Company cannot state with certainty what the eventual outcome of pending litigation or other claims will be.  In the opinion of the Company's management, based on current available information, review with outside legal counsel, and consideration of amounts provided for in the accompanying consolidated financial statements with respect to these matters, ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.  However, resolution of one or more of these matters may have a material effect on the results of operations in any future period, depending upon the ultimate resolution of those matters and upon the level of income for such period.

10



Note 7 - Capital Transactions

The following table presents information on a monthly basis for purchases of the Company’s stock for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 (in 000’s, except per share amounts):

 
Number of
 
Average
 
Shares Purchases (1)
 
Price Per Share
       
October
-
 
-
November
363
 
$ 29.49
December
2,341
 
31.08
Total
2,704
 
30.86


(1)  
The Company does not have a formal stock repurchase plan. Shares are repurchased at the discretion of management pursuant to prior authorization from the board of directors. On May 20, 2004, the board of directors authorized purchases of up to $75 million. Since that date, 77,704 shares have been purchased for a total of $1.8 million, leaving $73.2 million available to repurchase shares. Historically the Company has considered such purchases when the price of its stock reaches or approaches 1.5 times book value or when employees surrender shares as payment for option exercises. The decision to repurchase shares is subject to cash availability and other factors. During the quarter ended December 31, 2004, the Company only purchased shares that were surrendered by employees as payment for option exercises.

Note 8 - Regulation and Capital Requirements

The broker-dealer subsidiaries of the Company are subject to the requirements of the Uniform Net Capital Rule (Rule 15c3-1) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Raymond James & Associates, Inc. (“RJA”), a member firm of the NYSE, is also subject to the rules of the NYSE, whose requirements are substantially the same. Rule 15c3-1 requires that aggregate indebtedness, as defined, not exceed fifteen times net capital, as defined. Rule 15c3-1 also provides for an “alternative net capital requirement”, which both RJA and RJFS have elected. It requires that minimum net capital, as defined, be equal to the greater of $250,000 or two percent of Aggregate Debit Items arising from client transactions. The NYSE may require a member firm to reduce its business if its net capital is less than four percent of Aggregate Debit Items and may prohibit a member firm from expanding its business and declaring cash dividends if its net capital is less than five percent of Aggregate Debit Items. The net capital positions of the Company's broker-dealer subsidiaries were as follows:

 
December 31,
 
September 24,
 
2004
 
2004
Raymond James & Associates, Inc.:
($ in 000's)
(alternative method elected)
     
Net capital as a percent of Aggregate
     
Debit Items
28% 
 
28% 
Net capital
$ 357,942 
 
$ 363,049 
Less: required net capital
(26,018)
 
(25,840)
Excess net capital
$ 331,924 
 
$ 337,209 

At December 31, 2004 and September 24, 2004, RJFS had no Aggregate Debit Items and therefore the minimum net capital of $250,000 was applicable. The net capital position of RJFS at December 31, 2004 and September 24, 2004 was as follows:

 
December 31,
 
September 24,
 
2004
 
2004
Raymond James Financial Services, Inc.:
(in 000's)
(alternative method elected)
     
Net capital
$ 40,870 
 
$ 39,663 
Less: required net capital
(250)
 
(250)
Excess net capital
$ 40,620 
 
$ 39,413 


11



Raymond James Ltd. is subject to the Minimum Capital Rule (By-Law No. 17 of the Investment Dealers Association ("IDA")) and the Early Warning System (By-Law No. 30 of the IDA). The Minimum Capital Rule requires that every member shall have and maintain at all times Risk Adjusted Capital greater than zero calculated in accordance with Form 1 (Joint Regulatory Financial Questionnaire and Report) and with such requirements as the Board of Directors of the IDA may from time to time prescribe. Insufficient Risk Adjusted Capital may result in suspension from membership in the stock exchanges or the IDA.

The Early Warning System is designed to provide advance warning that a member firm is encountering financial difficulties. This system imposes certain sanctions on members who are designated in Early Warning level 1 or level 2 according to its capital, profitability, liquidity position, frequency of designation or at the discretion of the IDA. Restrictions on business activities and capital transactions, early filing requirements, and mandated corrective measures are sanctions that may be imposed as part of the Early Warning System. The Company was not in Early Warning level 1 or level 2 at December 31, 2004 or September 24, 2004.

The Risk Adjusted Capital of RJ Ltd. was CDN $21,613,296 and CDN $20,422,000 at December 31, 2004 and September 30, 2004, respectively.

RJBank is subject to various regulatory and capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory - and possibly additional discretionary - actions by regulators. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, RJBank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of RJBank's assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. RJBank's capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require RJBank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier I Capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined). Management believes that, as of December 31, 2004 and September 24, 2004, the Bank meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.

As of December 31, 2004, the most recent notification from the Office of Thrift Supervision categorized RJBank as “well capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as “well capitalized”, RJBank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier I risk-based, and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the table below. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the institution's category.

   
Requirement for capital
Requirement
   
adequacy
to be categorized as
 
Actual
purposes
"well capitalized"
 
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
 
($ in 000's)
As of December 31, 2004:
           
Total capital (to
           
risk-weighted assets)
$ 85,388
17.6%
$ 38,832
8.0%
$ 48,540
10.0%
Tier I capital (to
           
risk-weighted assets)
79,295
16.3%
19,416
4.0%
29,124
6.0%
Tier I capital (to
           
adjusted assets)
79,295
8.5%
37,123
4.0%
46,404
5.0%
             
As of September 30, 2004:
           
Total capital (to
           
risk-weighted assets)
$ 84,278
15.1%
$ 44,666
8.0%
$ 55,832
10.0%
Tier I capital (to
           
risk-weighted assets)
77,299
13.8%
22,333
4.0%
33,499
6.0%
Tier I capital (to
           
adjusted assets)
77,299
8.0%
38,468
4.0%
48,084
5.0%



12



Note 9 - Earnings Per Share

The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in 000's, except per share amounts):

 
Three Months Ended
 
December 31,
 
December 26,
 
2004
 
2003
       
Net income
$39,243
 
$24,230
       
Weighted average common shares
     
outstanding during the period *
74,002
 
72,881
       
Additional shares assuming
     
exercise of stock options * (1)
1,332
 
1,230
       
Weighted average diluted common shares * (1)
75,334
 
74,111
       
Net income per share - basic *
$ 0.53
 
$ 0.33
       
Net income per share - diluted * (1)
$ 0.52
 
$ 0.33
       

* All common stock and per share amounts adjusted for the March 24, 2004 3-for-2 stock split.

For the three months ended December 31, 2004 and December 26, 2003, approximately 20,000 shares attributable to outstanding stock options were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

(1)
Represents the number of shares of common stock issuable on the exercise of dilutive employee stock options less the number of shares of common stock which could have been purchased with the proceeds from the exercise of such options. These purchases were assumed to have been made at the average market price of the common stock during the period, or that part of the period for which the option was outstanding.

Note 10 - Comprehensive Income

Total comprehensive income for the three months ended December 31, 2004 and December 26, 2003 is as follows (in 000's):

 
Three Months Ended
 
December 31,
 
December 26,
 
2004
 
2003
Net income
$ 39,243 
 
$ 24,230 
Other comprehensive income:
     
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale, net of tax
143 
 
(83)
Unrealized gain on interest rate swaps accounted for as cash flow hedges, net of tax
357 
 
644 
Foreign currency translation adjustment
2,190 
 
(94)
       
Total comprehensive income
$ 41,933 
 
$ 24,697 

13



Note 11 - Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities

The Company makes limited use of derivative financial instruments in certain of its businesses. Certain derivative financial instruments are used to manage well-defined interest rate risk at RJBank, while others are designed to offset risk within fixed income inventories. In addition, the Company acts as a dealer/agent in matched book swap transactions. The Company accounts for derivative financial instruments and hedging activities in accordance with SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities", as subsequently amended by SFAS No. 137, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities - Deferral of the Effective Date of FASB Statements No. 133", SFAS No. 138, "Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities", and SFAS No. 149, "Amendments of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities", which establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivatives and hedging activities. These statements establish standards for designating a derivative as a hedge. Derivatives in a broker-dealer or those that do not meet the criteria for designation as a hedge are accounted for as trading account assets, and recorded at fair value in the statement of financial condition with the gain or loss recorded in the statement of operations for the period.

RJBank uses variable-rate deposits to finance the purchase of certain loan pools that are fixed for the first five years of their life. The funding sources expose RJBank to variability in interest payments due to changes in interest rates. Management believes it is prudent to limit the variability of its interest payments. To meet this objective, management enters into interest rate swap agreements to manage fluctuations in cash flows resulting from interest rate risk. These swaps change the variable-rate cash flow exposure on the funding sources to fixed cash flows. Under the terms of the interest rate swaps, RJBank receives variable interest rate payments and makes fixed interest rate payments, thereby creating the equivalent of fixed-rate funding. At December 31, 2004 and September 24, 2004, RJBank was party to $46.6 million and $48.9 million, respectively, in notional amount of interest rate swap agreements, and had securities and cash totaling $2.9 million and $3.0 million, respectively, pledged or held as interest-bearing collateral for such agreements.

Changes in the fair value of a derivative that is highly effective, as defined by SFAS 133, and that is designated and qualifies as a cash flow hedge are recorded in other comprehensive income until earnings are affected by the variability in cash flows of the designated hedged item. Any ineffectiveness resulting from the cash flow hedge is recorded in income or expense at the end of each reporting period. When hedge accounting is discontinued, RJBank continues to carry the derivative at its fair value in the statement of financial condition, and recognizes any changes in its fair value in earnings. For the three months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, RJBank recorded $3,074 and $131,628, respectively, in income from ineffective cash flow hedges and transition adjustments.

The Company also uses interest rate swaps to offset risk in certain fixed income inventory positions. The economically hedged positions and the swaps are marked to market with the gain or loss recorded in the statement of operations for the period. At December 31, 2004 and September 24, 2004, the Company had notional values of $134 million and $33 million, respectively, in interest rate swaps designed to offset risk in its fixed income trading inventory. In addition to these economically hedged transactions, the Company enters into interest rate swaps with some of its institutional clients. The net market value of all open swap positions at December 31, 2004 and September 24, 2004 was an asset of $6,465,000 and $5,074,000, respectively.

The Company is exposed to credit losses in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to its interest rate swap agreements. The Company performs a credit evaluation of counterparties prior to entering into swap transactions. Currently, the Company anticipates that all counterparties will be able to fully satisfy their obligations under those agreements. The Company may require collateral from counterparties to support these obligations as established by the credit threshold specified by the agreement and/or as a result of monitoring the credit standing of the counterparties. However, state laws may prohibit municipalities and other governmental entities from posting collateral in these transactions.

Note 12 - Segment Information
 
The Company currently operates through the following five business segments: Private Client Group, Capital Markets, Asset Management, RJBank, and Other. The business segments are based upon factors such as the services provided and the distribution channels served and are consistent with how the Company assesses performance and determines how to allocate resources throughout the Company and its subsidiaries. The financial results of the Company's segments are presented using the same policies as those described in Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K. Segment data includes charges allocating corporate overhead and benefits to each segment. Intersegment revenues, charges, receivables and payables are eliminated between segments upon consolidation.

14



The Private Client Group segment includes the retail branches of the Company's broker-dealer subsidiaries located throughout the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. These branches provide securities brokerage services including the sale of equities, mutual funds, fixed income products and insurance products to their individual clients. The segment includes net interest earnings on client margin loans and cash balances. Additionally, this segment includes the correspondent clearing services that the Company provides to other broker-dealer firms.
 
The Capital Markets segment includes institutional sales and trading in the United States, Canada and Europe. It provides securities brokerage services, as well as trading and research services to institutions with an emphasis on the sale of U.S. and Canadian equities and fixed income products. This segment also includes the Company's management of and participation in underwritings, merger and acquisition services, public finance activities, and the operations of Raymond James Tax Credit Funds.

The Asset Management segment includes investment portfolio management services of Eagle Asset Management, Inc., Awad Asset Management, Inc., and the Raymond James & Associates asset management services division, mutual fund management by Heritage Asset Management, Inc., private equity management by Raymond James Capital, Inc., and trust services of Raymond James Trust Company and Raymond James Trust Company West. In addition to the asset management services noted above, this segment also offers fee-based programs to clients who have contracted for portfolio management services from outside money managers.

Raymond James Bank is a separate segment, which provides consumer, residential, and commercial loans, as well as FDIC-insured deposit accounts to clients of the Company's broker-dealer subsidiaries and to the general public.

The Other segment includes the Company's securities lending business and the activities of the consolidated foreign joint ventures in emerging market countries.

Information concerning operations in these segments of business is as follows (in 000's):

 
Three Months Ended
 
December 31,
 
December 26,
 
2004
 
2003
Revenues:
     
Private Client Group
$339,948 
 
$286,803 
Capital Markets
117,019 
 
91,607 
Asset Management
39,955 
 
33,911 
RJBank
8,983 
 
6,558 
Other
18,472 
 
5,781 
Total
$524,377 
 
$424,660 
       
Pre-tax Income:
     
Private Client Group
$ 32,987 
 
$ 27,259 
Capital Markets
17,330 
 
6,015 
Asset Management
8,383 
 
4,922 
RJBank
3,252 
 
1,897 
Other
2,853 
 
(1,138)
Total
$ 64,805 
 
$ 38,955 

The following table presents the Company's total assets on a segment basis (in 000's):

 
December 31,
 
September 24,
 
2004
 
2004
 
(000's)
   
Total Assets:
     
Private Client Group
$ 4,833,332 
 
$ 3,945,968 
Capital Markets
807,322 
 
740,210 
Asset Management
55,705 
 
81,559 
RJBank
932,165 
 
924,747 
Other*
1,329,972 
 
1,929,362 
Total
$ 7,958,496 
 
$ 7,621,846 



15



* Includes Stock Borrowed balance of $1,005,978 and $1,536,879 at December 31, 2004 and September 24, 2004, respectively.

The Company has operations in the United States, Canada, Europe and joint ventures in India, France, Turkey, and Argentina. Substantially all long-lived assets are located in the United States. The following table represents revenue by country for the three months ended December 31, 2004 and December 26, 2003 (in 000’s).

 
Three Months Ended
 
December 31,
 
December 26,
 
2004
 
2003
Revenues:
     
United States
$468,079
 
$379,614
Canada
36,878
 
29,938
Europe
11,588
 
9,533
Other
     7,832
 
     5,575
     Total
$524,377
 
$424,660

While the dollar amount invested in emerging market joint ventures is only $4.5 million, these investments carry greater risk than amounts invested in developed markets.


16


ITEM 2.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

(The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Segment Information included in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements).

Business and Economic Overview

With the Company's results highly correlated to the U.S. equities markets, the 7-8% increase in the major equity indices from September 24, 2004 to December 31, 2004, augmented by other positive factors, led to record quarterly net revenues of $499 million. Favorable market conditions, which included the strong post-election rally, contributed to another vibrant investment banking quarter and increased commissions levels. Commission revenues were also positively impacted by an unusual fourteen-week quarter, which also had a material impact on interest earnings. The combination of the long quarter, rising interest rates and increased customer margin balances produced a significant increase in net interest income. The combination of these factors, combined with excellent trading profits and the continued impact of positive operating leverage, resulted in the 62% increase in net income, representing the second best quarterly earnings in the Company's history. The confluence of these numerous factors is rare, and therefore the results cannot be annualized.

The Company’s net revenues increased $85 million, or 21%, over the same quarter in the prior year. Net income increased $15 million, or 62%, representing an increase of $.19 per diluted share, or 58%. All of the Company’s operating segments contributed to the increase.

Segments

The company operates through the following five segments: Private Client Group, Capital Markets, Asset Management, RJBank, and Other.

Private Client Group

The Private Client Group segment includes the retail branches of the Company's broker-dealer subsidiaries located throughout the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. The Private Client Group Financial Advisors provide securities brokerage services including the sale of equity securities, mutual funds, fixed income instruments and insurance products. This segment accounts for the majority of the Company's revenues (65% of total company revenues for the three months ended December 31, 2004). It generates revenues principally through commissions charged on securities transactions, fees from wrap fee investment accounts and the interest revenue generated from client margin loans and cash balances. The Company charges commissions to its Private Client Group clients based on commission schedules or through asset-based fee alternatives that clients can elect as an alternative to traditional commissions.

The success of the Private Client Group is dependent upon the quality and integrity of its Financial Advisors and other associates and the Company's ability to attract, retain, and motivate a sufficient number of these associates. The Company faces competition for qualified associates from major financial services companies, including other brokerage firms, insurance companies, banking institutions, and discount brokerage firms. The Company currently offers several alternatives for Financial Advisors including the traditional branch setting, under which the Financial Advisors are employees of the Company and the costs associated with running the branch are incurred by the Company, to the independent contractor model, under which the Financial Advisors are responsible for all of their own direct costs. Accordingly, the independent contractor Financial Advisors are paid a larger percentage of commissions and fees. By offering alternative models to potential and existing Financial Advisors, the Company is able to effectively compete with other brokerage firms for qualified Financial Advisors, as Financial Advisors are able to choose the model that best suits their practice and profile. As of December 31, 2004 the Company had over 4,800 Private Client Group Financial Advisors. Although this number is relatively flat when compared to the same time period in the prior year, it reflects an on-going effort to create a more productive sales force by adjusting and enforcing the minimum production standards for Financial Advisors to remain with the Company. The following table presents a summary of Private Client Group Financial Advisors as of the periods indicated.

17



 
 
December 31,
 
 
December 26,
 
2004
 
2003
Private Client Group - Financial Advisors:
     
Traditional Branch
1,059
 
1,011
Independent Contractor
3,832
 
3,822
Total Financial Advisors
4,891
 
4,833

For the quarter ended December 31, 2004, Private Client Group segment revenues increased $53 million, or 19%, when compared to the same quarter in the prior year. Of this increase, approximately $40 million is attributable to the increase in securities commissions and fees.

The activity level, as evidenced by a 20% increase in trade volume, resulted in increased transaction based commissions. An increase in equity values due to market appreciation, combined with additional new customer assets, resulted in increased wrap account fees.

This segment also includes the interest earned on client margin account balances and on the assets segregated pursuant to Federal Regulations, as well as the interest expense paid on client cash balances. The combination of an increase of $171 million in average client margin balances and an average rate exceeding the prior year’s rate by approximately one hundred basis points resulted in an increase in related interest revenue of over $11 million. Offsetting this was $6 million increase in interest paid to clients on cash balances awaiting investment due to the increase in interest rates.

 
Three Months Ended
 
December 31,
 
December 26,
 
2004
 
2003
 
($ in millions)
Client Margin Accounts:
     
Average Balance
$ 1,107 
 
$ 936 
Average Rate
4.90%
 
3.87%
       
Assets Segregated:
     
Average Balance
$ 2,228 
 
$ 2,290 
Average Rate
1.97%
 
.97%
       
Client Interest Program:
     
Average Balance
$ 2,767 
 
$2,712  
Average Rate
1.17%
 
.35%

The largest increase in expenses within the segment was in compensation, with the commission expense increasing ratably with the increased commission revenue. Other operating expenses such as communications, information processing, and business development also increased due to business volume. Other Expense increased as a result of increased legal reserves. The net result was a 21% increase in pre-tax income.

18



Capital Markets

The Capital Markets segment includes institutional sales and trading in the United States, Canada, and Europe; management of and participation in underwritings; merger and acquisition services; public finance activities; and the syndication of investment partnerships designed to yield returns in the form of low-income housing tax credits. The Company provides securities brokerage services to institutions with an emphasis on the sale of U.S. and Canadian equities and fixed income products. Institutional sales commissions account for the majority of the segment's revenue and are driven primarily through trade volume, which is fueled by a combination of general market activity and by the Financial Advisors' ability to find attractive investment opportunities and promote those opportunities to potential and existing clients. Revenues from investment banking activities are driven principally by the number and the dollar value of the transactions with which the company is involved. This segment includes trading of taxable and tax-exempt and high yield fixed income products, as well as equity securities in the OTC and Canadian markets. This trading involves the purchase of securities from, and the sale of securities to, clients of the Company or other dealers who may be purchasing or selling securities for their own account or acting as agent for their clients. Profits and losses related to this trading activity are primarily derived from the spreads between bid and asked prices.

Capital Markets segment revenues increased by $25 million, or 28%, during the quarter ended December 31, 2004. The increase is primarily attributable to an increase in sales commissions of approximately $5 million, an increase in investment banking revenue of $8 million, increased trading profits of $6 million and increased interest income on fixed income inventory of $6 million. The increase in securities commissions was split approximately equally between equity and fixed income products. The increase in investment banking revenue is attributable to an increase in the number and dollar value of lead and co-managed equity underwritings as shown in the following tables:

 
 
Three Months Ended
 
December 31,
 
December 26,
 
2004
 
2003
Number of managed/co-managed public equity offerings:
     
US
26
 
23
Canada
8
 
9
       
Total dollars raised (in 000's):
     
US
$5,334,000
 
$3,800,000
Canada (in U.S. dollars)
51,000
 
167,000

The underwriting volume for the first quarter of fiscal 2005 continued at the robust levels that were experienced in the prior year. This can be attributed to favorable market conditions and the anticipation of the continuation of a strengthening U.S. economy and resultant positive corporate earnings.

As a result of the aforementioned revenue increases, net of increased compensation driven by revenue increases and in general operating expenses, pre-tax income increased $11 million, or 188%, demonstrating the operating leverage in this segment.

19



Asset Management

 
The Asset Management segment includes investment portfolio management services, mutual fund management, private equity management, and trust services. Investment portfolio management services include both proprietary and selected outside money managers. The majority of the revenue for this segment is generated by the investment advisory fees related to asset management services for individual investment portfolios and mutual funds. These accounts are billed a fee based on a percentage of assets. Investment advisory fees are charged based on either a single point in time within the quarter, typically the beginning or end of a quarter, or the “average daily” balances of assets under management. The balance of assets under management is affected by both the performance of the underlying investments and the new sales and redemptions of client accounts/funds. Improving equity markets provide the Asset Management segment with the potential to improve revenues from investment advisory fees as existing accounts appreciate in value, in addition to individuals and institutions being more likely to commit new funds to the equity markets. The following table presents the assets under management as of the dates indicated:

 
 
Dec. 31,
 
Sept. 24,
 
Dec. 26,
 
Sept. 26,
 
2004
 
2004
 
2003
 
2003
Assets Under Management (in 000's):
             
               
Eagle Asset Management, Inc.
$10,393,956
 
$ 8,842,611
 
$ 8,168,003
 
$ 7,200,468
Heritage Family of Mutual Funds
8,533,528
 
8,055,112
 
8,075,064
 
8,145,806
Raymond James Consulting Services
5,632,472
 
4,810,935
 
4,076,956
 
3,653,276
Awad Asset Management
1,560,230
 
1,349,040
 
1,056,320
 
901,224
Freedom Accounts
1,264,874
 
988,010
 
631,383
 
475,465
Total Assets Under Management
$27,385,060
 
$24,045,708
 
$22,007,726
 
$20,376,239
               
Less: Assets Managed for Related Parties
2,313,716
 
1,728,788
 
1,310,292
 
1,134,555
               
Total Third Party Assets Under Management
$25,071,344
 
$22,316,920
 
$20,697,434
 
$19,241,684
               
Trust Company Assets Under Administration
$1,055,572
 
$949,773
 
$916,431
 
$805,567

The increase in revenues for the Asset Management segment of $6 million, or 18%, for the quarter ended December 31, 2004, is due entirely to the increase in investment advisory fees. Nearly half of the increase over the prior year quarter was a result of market appreciation. Pre-tax income increased by approximately $3.5 million, or 70%, once again evidencing operating leverage.

RJ Bank

RJBank provides residential, consumer, and commercial loans, as well as FDIC-insured deposit accounts, to clients of the Company's broker-dealer subsidiaries and to the general public. RJBank also purchases residential whole loan packages, and participates with other banks in corporate loan syndications. RJBank generates revenue principally through the interest income earned on the loans noted above offset by the interest expense it incurs on client deposits and borrowings. RJBank’s policy is to maintain a substantially duration-matched portfolio of assets and liabilities. As the vast majority of liabilities are floating rate demand deposits, certain asset purchases are hedged with similar term deposits or FHLB advances, or by entering into interest rate swap contracts.

RJBank's revenues increased 36% over the prior year quarter to nearly $9 million, generating a 71% increase in pre-tax income. The improvement in net interest income is the combined result of loan growth as a percentage of total assets and the rising interest rate, which have resulted in greater interest revenues and improved spreads.

Other expense was lower than the prior year quarter as there was no significant net addition to loan balances within the quarter, as there was in the prior year. During the periods of growth as new loans are originated or purchased a general allowance for loan losses is established for potential losses inherent in those new loans. Accordingly, a robust period of net loan growth paradoxically results in depressed earnings in that period, while the benefit of the higher interest earnings is realized in later periods.

20



Other

The Other segment principally represents securities lending activity and investments in international joint ventures. Revenue for the segment is primarily interest generated by the securities lending activity, which involves the borrowing and lending of securities from and to other broker-dealers and other financial institutions, generally as an intermediary. The borrower of the securities puts up a cash deposit, commonly in excess of the market value of the securities, on which interest is earned. Conversely, the lender receives the cash deposit and incurs interest expense accordingly. As the Company generally acts as an intermediary between two firms that enter into a securities lending transaction, the Company earns a spread between the interest rates on the cash deposits.

Although stock lending balances were relatively flat, the rising rate environment has allowed interest spreads to improve, contributing to the increase in revenues and pre-tax income in this segment.

 
 
December 31,
 
December 26,
 
2004
 
2003
 
(in 000's)
Stock Borrowed - Average Balance
$1,312,752
 
$1,246,793
Stock Loaned - Average Balance
$1,386,534
 
$1,297,258
Average Spread
0.43%
 
0.28%

The Other segment has also been positively impacted by the increase in revenue from the foreign joint ventures in Latin America and Turkey, which are improving based on the same fundamentals as the U.S. and Canadian businesses - a strengthening economy and improving equity markets.

Liquidity and Capital Resources 

Cash provided by operating activities during the three months ended December 31, 2004 was approximately $46 million. Cash was provided by earnings and increased client payable balances. This was offset by an increase in receivables due from broker-dealers, an increase in securities inventory levels, and a decrease in accrued compensation, commissions, and benefits. Client payable balances were unusually high on December 31, 2004 as many Florida-based clients moved balances from the Company's money market fund to their brokerage accounts for intangible tax planning purposes.

Investing activities provided $10 million in cash, which is primarily due to the maturation and repayments of mortgage-backed securities and the sales of available for sale securities, net of reinvestment and capital expenditures.

Financing activities provided $34 million, the result of the payment of cash dividends, the net proceeds from borrowings, and net cash provided from the exercise of stock options and employee stock purchases.

At December 31, 2004 and September 24, 2004 the Company had loans payable of approximately $168 million and $136 million, respectively. The balance at December 31, 2004 is comprised primarily of a $72 million mortgage on its home-office complex, $85 million in Federal Home Loan Bank advances (used to fund operations at RJBank), and various short-term borrowings totaling $11 million. The increase from year-end is attributable primarily to the increase in the Federal Home Loan Bank advances.
 
As of December 31, 2004, consistent with year-end, the Company's liabilities are comprised primarily of client payables of $4.9 billion at the broker-dealer subsidiaries and RJBank, as well as deposits held on stock loaned transactions of $1.1 billion. The Company primarily acts as an intermediary in stock borrowed/loan transactions. As a result, the liability associated with the stock loaned transactions is almost entirely offset by the $1.0 billion receivable related to the Company's cash deposits for stock borrowed transactions. To meet its obligations to clients, the Company has approximately $2.8 billion in cash and cash equivalents segregated pursuant to federal regulations. The Company also has client receivables of $2.0 billion.

The Company believes its existing assets, which are highly liquid in nature, together with funds generated from operations should provide adequate funds for continuing operations.

As of December 31, 2004 both of the Company's domestic broker-dealer subsidiaries well exceeded the net capital requirements of the Uniform Net Capital Rule under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, RJ Ltd exceeded the Risk Adjusted Capital required under the Minimum Capital Rule of the IDA, and RJBank was “well capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. There have been no significant changes in circumstances since year-end that have affected the capital of the broker-dealer subsidiaries or RJBank with respect to their respective regulatory capital requirements.

21



In its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year-ended September 24, 2004, the Company reported that it had contractual obligations of $611 million, with $102 million coming due in 2005 and another $225 million related to RJBank's commitments to extend credit, which represented potential obligations of 2005. Since year-end, there have been no significant changes to the Company's contractual obligations.

In addition to the mortgage loan and advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank, the Company and its subsidiaries have several lines of credit denominated in U.S. dollars and one line of credit denominated in Canadian dollars, with aggregate available balances of $560 million and CDN$40 million (US$33 million), respectively. At December 31, 2004, the Company was in compliance with all covenants of the lines of credit and its mortgage loan, with $11 million drawn against these lines of credit.

Effects of Inflation

The Company's assets are primarily liquid in nature and are not significantly affected by inflation. Management believes that the changes in replacement cost of property and equipment are adequately insured and therefore would not materially affect operating results. However, the rate of inflation affects the Company's expenses, including employee compensation, communications and occupancy, which may not be readily recoverable through charges for services provided by the Company.

Factors Affecting “Forward-Looking Statements”

From time to time, the Company may publish “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or make verbal statements that constitute forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements may relate to such matters as anticipated financial performance, future revenues or earnings, business prospects, projected ventures, new products, anticipated market performance, and similar matters. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements. In order to comply with the terms of the safe harbor, the Company cautions readers that a variety of factors could cause the Company's actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the Company's forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the Company's control, include, but are not limited to: (i) transaction volume in the securities markets; (ii) the volatility of the securities markets; (iii) fluctuations in interest rates; (iv) changes in regulatory requirements which could affect the cost of doing business or the profitability of certain segments of the Company's business; (v) fluctuations in currency rates; (vi) general economic conditions, both domestic and international; (vii) changes in the rate of inflation and related impact on securities markets; (viii) competition from existing financial institutions and other new participants in the securities markets; (ix) legal developments affecting the litigation experience of the Company or the securities industry generally; (x) changes in federal and state tax laws which could affect the popularity of products sold by the Company; (xi) natural disasters; (xii) political and military events which would affect the United States of America or world markets, or which could disrupt the Company's communications and securities processing capabilities or other operations; and (xiii) changes in investor confidence which could adversely affect the sale of the Company's products and services. The Company does not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements.

Critical Accounting Policies

The condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. For a full description of these and other accounting policies, see Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company believes that of its significant accounting policies, those described below involve a high degree of judgment and complexity. These critical accounting policies require estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements. Due to their nature, estimates involve judgment based upon available information. Actual results or amounts could differ from estimates and the difference could have a material impact on the condensed consolidated financial statements. Therefore, understanding these policies is important in understanding the reported results of operations and the financial position of the Company.

22



Valuation of Securities

“Trading account securities” and “Available for sale securities” are reflected in the condensed consolidated statement of financial condition at fair value or amounts that approximate fair value. In accordance with SFAS 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities”, unrealized gains and losses related to these financial instruments are reflected in net earnings or other comprehensive income, depending on the underlying purpose of the instrument. The following table presents our trading and available for sale securities segregated into cash (i.e., non-derivative) trading instruments, derivative contracts, and available for sale securities:

 
December 31, 2004
 
 
Financial
Instruments Owned
at Fair Value
 
Financial
Instruments Sold
but not yet Purchased
at Fair Value
 
(in 000’s)
       
Cash trading instruments
$ 421,667
 
$ 184,348
Derivative contracts
15,424
 
6,477
Available for sale securities
200,153
 
-
Total
$ 637,244
 
$ 190,825

Cash Trading Instruments and Available for Sale Securities

When available, the Company uses prices from independent sources such as listed market prices, or broker or dealer price quotations to derive the fair value of the instruments. For investments in illiquid, privately held or other securities that do not have readily determinable fair values, the Company uses estimated fair values as determined by management. The following table presents the carrying value of cash trading and available for sale securities for which fair value is measured based on quoted prices or other independent sources versus those for which fair value is determined by management:

 
December 31, 2004
 
 
Financial
Instruments Owned at Fair Value
 
Financial
Instruments Sold
but not yet Purchased at
Fair Value
 
(in 000’s)
Fair value based on quoted prices and   independent sources
$ 547,444
 
$ 190,825
Fair value determined by Management
89,800
 
-
Total
$ 637,244
 
$ 190,825

Derivative Contracts

Fair value for derivative contracts are obtained from pricing models that consider current market and contractual prices for the underlying financial instruments or commodities, as well as time value and yield curve or volatility factors underlying the positions.

Goodwill

Intangible assets consist predominantly of goodwill related to the acquisitions of Roney & Co. (now part of RJA) and Goepel McDermid, Inc. (now called Raymond James Ltd). This goodwill, totaling $63 million, was allocated to the reporting units within the Private Client Group and Capital Markets segments pursuant to SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. Goodwill represents the excess cost of a business acquisition over the fair value of the net assets acquired. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, indefinite-life intangible assets and goodwill are not amortized.

23



The Company reviews its goodwill in order to determine whether its value is impaired on at least an annual basis. Goodwill is impaired when the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds the implied fair value of the reporting unit. When available, the Company uses recent, comparable transactions to estimate the fair value of the respective reporting units. The company calculates an estimated fair value based on multiples of revenues, earnings, and book value of comparable transactions. However, when such comparable transactions are not available or have become outdated, the Company uses discounted cash flow scenarios to estimate the fair value of the reporting units. As of December 31, 2004, goodwill had been allocated to the Private Client Group of RJA, and both the Private Client Group and Capital Markets segments of RJ Ltd. As of the most recent impairment test, the Company determined that the carrying value of the goodwill for each reporting unit had not been impaired. However, changes in current circumstances or business conditions could result in an impairment of goodwill. As required, the Company will continue to perform impairment testing on an annual basis or when an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount.

Reserves

The Company records reserves related to legal proceedings in "other payables". Such reserves are established and maintained in accordance with SFAS No. 5, "Accounting for Contingencies", and Financial Interpretation No. 14. The determination of these reserve amounts requires significant judgment on the part of management. Management considers many factors including, but not limited to: the amount of the claim; the amount of the loss in the client's account; the basis and validity of the claim; the possibility of wrongdoing on the part of an associate of the Company; likely insurance coverage; previous results in similar cases; and legal precedents and case law. Each legal proceeding is reviewed with counsel in each accounting period and the reserve is adjusted as deemed appropriate by management. Any change in the reserve amount is recorded in the consolidated financial statements and is recognized as a charge/credit to earnings in that period. The assumptions of management in determining the estimates of reserves may prove to be incorrect, which could materially affect results in the period the expenses are ultimately determined.

The Company also records reserves or allowances for doubtful accounts related to client receivables and loans. Client receivables at the broker-dealers are generally collateralized by securities owned by the brokerage clients. Therefore, when a receivable is considered to be impaired, the amount of the impairment is generally measured based on the fair value of the securities acting as collateral, which is measured based on current prices from independent sources such as listed market prices or broker-dealer price quotations.

Client loans at RJBank are generally collateralized by real estate or other property. RJBank provides for both an allowance for losses in accordance with SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies”, and a reserve for individually impaired loans in accordance with SFAS No. 114, “Accounting by a Creditor for Impairment of a Loan”. The calculation of the SFAS No. 5 allowance is subjective as management segregates the loan portfolio into different classes and assigns each class an allowance percentage based on the perceived risk associated with that class of loans. The factors taken into consideration when assigning the reserve percentage to each class include trends in delinquencies; volume and terms; changes in geographic distribution, lending policies, local, regional, and national economic conditions; and past loss history. For individual loans identified as impaired, RJBank measures impairment based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate, the loan's observable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. At December 31, 2004, the amortized cost of all RJBank loans was $720 million and an allowance for loan losses of $8.1 million was recorded against that balance. The allowance for loan losses was approximately 1.1% of the amortized cost of the loan portfolio and has not changed significantly since September 24, 2004.

The Company also makes loans or pays advances to Financial Advisors, primarily for recruiting and retention purposes. The Company provides for a general allowance for loan losses on such receivables based on historical collection experience. Additionally, the Company provides for a specific reserve on these receivables if a Financial Advisor is no longer associated with the Company and it is determined that it is probable the amount will not be collected. At December 31, 2004 the receivable from Financial Advisors was $42.4 million, which is net of an allowance of $4.0 million for estimated uncollectibility.

24



Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure of Market Risk


Market risk is the risk of loss to the Company resulting from changes in interest rates and equity prices. The Company has exposure to market risk primarily through its broker-dealer and banking operations. The Company's broker-dealer subsidiaries trade tax exempt and taxable debt obligations and act as an active market maker in approximately 260 over-the-counter equity securities. In connection with these activities, the Company maintains inventories in order to ensure availability of securities and to facilitate client transactions. Additionally, the Company, primarily within its Canadian broker-dealer subsidiary, invests for its own proprietary equity investment account.

The following table represents the carrying value of trading inventories associated with the Company's broker-dealer client facilitation, market-making activities and proprietary trading activities.



 
December 31, 2004
 
September 24, 2004
     
Securities
     
Securities
     
Sold but
     
Sold but
 
Trading
 
Not yet
 
Trading
 
Not yet
 
Securities
 
Purchased
 
Securities
 
Purchased
               
 
(in 000's)
Marketable:
             
Municipal
$ 203,869
 
$ 228
 
$ 192,099
 
-
Corporate
71,778
 
10,983
 
26,216
 
3,522
Government
103,550
 
112,143
 
52,335
 
66,073
Total debt securities
379,197
 
123,354
 
270,650
 
69,595
               
Equity & other securities
57,894
 
67,471
 
59,211
 
52,686
Total
$437,091
 
$190,825
 
$329,861
 
$122,281


Changes in value of the Company's trading inventory may result from fluctuations in interest rates, credit ratings of the issuer, equity prices and the correlation among these factors. The Company manages its trading inventory by product type and has established trading divisions that have responsibility for each product type. The Company's primary method of controlling risk in its trading inventory is through the use of limits. As of December 31, 2004, the absolute fixed income and equity inventory limits were $1,382,000,000 and $74,550,000, respectively. The Company's trading activities were well within these limits at December 31, 2004. Additionally, for its derivative activities, primarily interest rate swaps, the company has established a limit structure that is based on factors such as interest rate risk and spread exposure. Position limits in trading inventory accounts are monitored on a daily basis. Consolidated position and exposure reports are prepared and distributed to senior management. Limit violations are carefully monitored. Management monitors inventory levels and trading results, as well as inventory aging, pricing, concentration and securities ratings. For derivative instruments, mark-to-market prices are obtained from an external vendor and are compared to internal valuations. Summarized results are reviewed and a valuation adjustment is determined by management to record the instrument at estimated fair value.

RJBank maintains an investment portfolio that is comprised of mortgage-backed securities, as well as mortgage, consumer and commercial loans. Those investments are funded in part by its client obligations, including demand deposits, money market accounts, savings accounts, and certificates of deposit. Based on the banking industry and the current investment portfolio of RJBank, market risk for RJBank is limited primarily to interest rate risk. RJBank reviews interest rate risk based on the economic value of equity, and on net interest income, which is the net amount of interest received and interest paid. The following table represents the carrying value of RJBank's assets and liabilities that are subject to market risk. This table does not include financial instruments with limited market risk exposure due to offsetting asset and liability positions or short holding periods.

25



RJBank Financial Instruments with Market Risk (in 000's):
       
   
December 31, 2004
 
September 24, 2004
Debt securities
       
  Mortgage-backed securities
 
$ 194,536
 
$ 213,401
  Municipal obligations
 
40
 
41
    Total debt securities
 
194,576
 
213,442
         
  Loans available for sale
 
1,233
 
694
         
Equity securities
 
5,551
 
5,260
         
    Total assets with market risk
 
$ 201,360
 
$ 219,396
         
         
  Certificates of deposit
 
$ 169,034
 
$ 140,980
         
Federal home loan bank advances
 
85,300
 
60,000
    Total liabilities with market risk
 
$ 254,334
 
$ 200,980

Interest Rate Risk

RJA is exposed to interest rate risk as a result of maintaining trading inventories of fixed income instruments, which are sensitive to changes in interest rates. The Company monitors, on a daily basis, the Value-at-Risk (“VaR”) in its institutional Fixed Income trading portfolios (cash instruments and interest rate derivatives held either as economic hedges or as customer-related positions). Using a variance/covariance methodology, VaR is a technique for estimating the potential loss in the Company's fixed income portfolio due to adverse market movements over a defined time horizon with a specified confidence level.

A standard regulatory-type data set is used (one year historical observation period, 0% exponential decay) and the results are compared daily against those obtained using corresponding data with a 6% exponential decay factor. VaR is reported at a 99% confidence level, based on a 1-day holding period; this is consistent with the Company's high-turnover trading activity, which is based on supporting client sales activity. This means that there is a one in 100 chance that daily trading net revenues will fall below the expected daily trading net revenues by an amount at least as large as the reported VaR. However, shortfalls on a single day can exceed reported VaR by significant amounts. Shortfalls can also accumulate over a longer time horizon, such as a number of consecutive trading days.

The following table sets forth the high, low and average VaR for the Company's overall portfolio during the quarter ended December 31, 2004, with the corresponding dollar value of the Company's portfolio:

   
Highest Daily VaR
 
Lowest Daily VaR
 
Daily Averages
VaR
 
$ 1,899,000
 
$ 632,000
 
$ 983,000
Portfolio value (net)
 
$312,154,000
 
$133,757,000
 
$ 226,640,000
VaR as a percent of portfolio value
 
0.61%
 
0.47%
 
0.44%

The increase in the dollar VaR exposure during this quarter was attributable to an underwriting commitment that increased the net trading portfolio, and the impact of transactions entered into to hedge this position. As a percentage of portfolio, the VaR exposure was consistent with prior periods.

The modeling of the risk characteristics of trading positions involves a number of assumptions and approximations. While management believes that its assumptions and approximations are reasonable, there is no uniform industry methodology for estimating VaR, and different assumptions and/or approximations could produce materially different VaR estimates. Given its reliance on historical data, VaR is most effective in estimating risk exposures in markets in which there are no sudden fundamental changes or shifts in market conditions. An inherent limitation of VaR is that the distribution of past changes in market risk factors may not produce accurate predictions of future market risk. Moreover, VaR calculated for a one-day time horizon does not fully capture the market risk of positions that cannot be liquidated or offset with hedges within one day. Accordingly, management also monitors the risk in its trading activities by establishing position limits and daily review of trading results, inventory aging, pricing, concentration and securities ratings.

Additional information is discussed under Derivative Financial Instruments in Note 11 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q.

26



As noted above, RJBank reviews interest rate risk based on net interest income and equity valuation. One of the core objectives of RJBank's Asset/Liability Management Committee is to manage the sensitivity of net interest income to changes in market interest rates. The Asset/Liability Management Committee uses several measures to monitor and limit RJBank's interest rate risk including scenario analysis, interest repricing gap analysis and limits, and net portfolio value limits. Model-based scenario analysis is used to monitor and report the interest rate risk positions, and analyze alternative strategies.

Net interest income is the net amount of interest received less interest paid. This involves large volumes of contracts and transactions, and numerous different products. Simulation models and estimation techniques are used to assess the sensitivity of the net interest income stream to movements in interest rates. Assumptions about consumer behavior play an important role in these calculations; this is particularly relevant for loans such as mortgages where the client has the right, but not the obligation, to repay before the scheduled maturity. On the liability side, the re-pricing characteristics of deposits are based on estimates since the rates are not coupled to a specified market rate.

The sensitivity of net interest income to interest rate conditions is estimated for a variety of scenarios. Assuming an immediate and lasting shift of 100 basis points in the term structure of interest rates, RJBank's sensitivity analysis indicates that an upward movement would decrease RJBank's net interest income by 5.9% in the first year after the rate jump, whereas a downward shift of the same magnitude would decrease RJBank's net interest income by 6.2%. These sensitivity figures are based on positions as of December 31, 2004, and are subject to certain simplifying assumptions, including that management takes no corrective action. This outcome is largely due to the combination of historically low levels of interest rates in the United States leading to sharply higher pre-payment expectations if rates fall, and only limited opportunity to adjust rates downward on the liability side.

Equity Price Risk

The Company is exposed to equity price risk as a consequence of making markets in equity securities and the investment activities of RJA and RJ Ltd. The U.S. broker-dealer activities are client-driven, with the objective of meeting clients' needs while earning a trading profit to compensate for the risk associated with carrying inventory. The Company's equity inventories are primarily readily marketable and held for only short periods of time. The Company attempts to reduce the risk of loss inherent in its inventory of equity securities by monitoring those security positions constantly throughout each day and establishing position limits. The Company's Canadian broker-dealer has a proprietary trading business with 23 traders. The average aggregate inventory held for proprietary trading during the quarter-ended December 31, 2004 was CDN$5,621,382. The Company's equity securities inventories are priced on a regular basis and there are no material unrecorded gains or losses

Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls are procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company's reports filed under the Exchange Act, such as this report, is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. Disclosure controls are also designed to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, as ours are designed to do, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

Within the 90-day period prior to the filing of this report, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures were effective. No significant changes were made in the internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation.

27



PART II OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company is a defendant or co-defendant in various lawsuits and arbitrations incidental to its securities business.  Like others in the retail securities industry, the Company has experienced a significant increase in the number of claims seeking recovery due to portfolio losses.

As a result of the extensive regulation of the securities industry, the Company's broker-dealer subsidiaries are subject to regular reviews and inspections by regulatory authorities and self-regulatory organizations, which can result in the imposition of sanctions for regulatory violations, ranging from non-monetary censure to fines and, in serious cases, temporary or permanent suspension from business. In addition, from time to time regulatory agencies and self-regulatory organizations institute investigations into industry practices, which can also result in the imposition of such sanctions.

As previously reported, RJFS and the SEC staff were unable to reach a resolution regarding a proposed enforcement action alleging fraud and failure to supervise a former Financial Advisor in the RJFS Rhode Island office. On September 30, 2004, the SEC issued an order instituting public administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings pursuant to section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933, sections 15(b) and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and section 203(f) of the Investment advisor Act of 1940 against RJFS, its former President and a former branch manager.  Among other things, the SEC alleges that RJFS violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. This matter is scheduled for a hearing before an administrative law judge in February 2005.

As previously reported, the Company and RJFS are defendants in a series of lawsuits and arbitrations relating to an alleged mortgage lending program known as the "Premiere 72" program, that was administered by a company owned in part by two individuals who were registered as Financial Advisors with RJFS in Houston. The lawsuits are pending in various courts, and several of the arbitration claims relating to this matter have been settled by RJFS for amounts consistent with its evaluation of those claims. Several cases that had been removed to federal court were remanded to state court, and the plaintiffs are seeking reconsideration of that decision.

In the first arbitration to reach a hearing, claimants sought approximately $1.8 million dollars in damages plus punitive damages.  The panel entered a preliminary order requiring RJFS to pay its clients their losses through a formula, which included the assignment to RJFS of their interests in the real estate transactions, awarded claimants attorneys' fees and directed the parties to calculate the actual amount to be paid. In the order the panel denied any recovery to non-clients. The amounts due under the formula were substantially less than the claimants sought and the parties settled on terms consistent with the order. The Company does not believe that this order represents a precedent that would govern future decisions.  Arbitration proceedings for other claimants are currently scheduled through November 2006.

Although the total amount funded by participants in this lending program may exceed $150 million, the amount of actual loss of the claimants is not determinable at this time because the participants are actively attempting to realize value from the underlying real estate collateral. Based on discovery to date, the Company and RJFS believe they have strong defenses to these claims and are vigorously contesting them.

The Company is contesting the allegations in these and other matters and believes that there are meritorious defenses in each of these matters.  In view of the number and diversity of claims against the Company, the number of jurisdictions in which litigation is pending and the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of litigation and other claims, the Company cannot state with certainty what the eventual outcome of pending litigation or other claims will be.  In the opinion of the Company's management, based on current available information, review with outside legal counsel, and consideration of amounts provided for in the accompanying consolidated financial statements with respect to these matters, ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.  However, resolution of one or more of these matters may have a material effect on the results of operations in any future period, depending upon the ultimate resolution of those matters and upon the level of income for such period.

28



Item 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS 

Reference is made to information contained under “Capital Transactions” in Note 7 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the information required by Part II, Item 2(c).

The Company expects to continue paying cash dividends. However, the payment and rate of dividends on the Company's common stock is subject to several factors including operating results, financial requirements of the Company, compliance with the net worth covenant in the Company's line of credit agreement, and the availability of funds from the Company's subsidiaries, including the broker-dealer subsidiaries, which may be subject to restrictions under the net capital rules of the SEC, NYSE and the IDA; and RJBank, which may be subject to restrictions by federal banking agencies. Such restrictions have never become applicable with respect to the Company's dividend payments. (See Note 8 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on the capital restrictions placed on RJBank and the Company's broker-dealer subsidiaries).

Item 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a)  
Exhibits

11
 
Statement Re: Computation of per Share Earnings (The calculation of per share earnings is included in Part I, Item 1 in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Earnings Per Share) and is omitted here in accordance with Section (b)(11) of Item 601 of Regulation S-K.).
     
31.1
 
Principal Executive Officer Certification as required by Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), filed herewith.
     
31.2
 
Principal Financial Officer Certification as required by Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), filed herewith.
     
32
 
Certification furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.

(a)  
Reports on Form 8-K

During the quarter, the Company filed the following Current Reports on Form 8-K:

(i)
 
A Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 30, 2004 and filed October 1, 2004 pertaining to the Company's response to the announcement by the Securities and Exchange Commission that it instituted administrative proceedings against the Company.
     
(ii)
 
A Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 12, 2004 and filed on October 15, 2004, announcing the Company renewed its unsecured revolving line of credit and the appointment of a new director to the Company's Board of Directors.
     
(iii)
 
A Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 20, 2004 and filed October 20, 2004 pertaining to the Company's results of operations for the fiscal year and fourth quarter ended September 24, 2004.
     
(iv)
 
A Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 17, 2004 and filed November 19, 2004 pertaining to the release of selected operating statistics of the Company for the month of October 2004.


29



     
(v)
 
A Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 1, 2004 and filed December 2, 2004 pertaining to the Company's segment information for the month of September 2004. In addition, the Company released information relating to the Company's upcoming annual meeting and quarterly dividend.
     
(vi)
 
A Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 16, 2004 and filed December 17, 2004 pertaining to the release of selected operating statistics of the Company for the month of November 2004.


30



SIGNATURES






     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



 
   
RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC.
   
(Registrant)
     
     
     
     
Date:   February 9, 2005
 
/s/ Thomas A. James
   
Thomas A. James
   
Chairman and Chief
   
Executive Officer
     
     
     
     
   
/s/ Jeffrey P. Julien
   
Jeffrey P. Julien
   
Senior Vice President - Finance
   
and Chief Financial
   
Officer


31



Exhibit 31.1
 
CERTIFICATIONS 
 
 
I, Thomas A. James, certify that:
 
 
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Raymond James Financial, Inc;
 
 
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 
4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
 
 
5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
Date: February 9, 2005
 
 
/s/ THOMAS A. JAMES  
 
 
Thomas A. James
 
 
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 

32


 
Exhibit 31.2
 
 
CERTIFICATIONS 
 
 
I, Jeffrey P. Julien, certify that:
 
 
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Raymond James Financial, Inc;
 
 
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 
4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
 
 
5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
Date: February 9, 2005
 
/s/ JEFFREY P. JULIEN 
Jeffrey P. Julien
Senior Vice President - Finance
and Chief Financial Officer

33


Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


We hereby certify to the best of our knowledge that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Raymond James Financial Inc. for the quarter ending December 31, 2004 containing the financial statements fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Thomas A. James
Thomas A. James
Chief Executive Officer
 
                                                /s/ Jeffrey P. Julien
Jeffrey P. Julien
Chief Financial Officer


Dated: February 9, 2005