Back to GetFilings.com

UNITED STATES

                    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                                      Washington, D.C. 20549

                                                  FORM 10-Q

                                                  (Mark One)

X

Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the period ended                         June 30, 2003                           

          Transaction Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of    

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transaction period from                                      to                 __        

Commission File Number                      0-11204                                            

                                                 AmeriServ Financial, Inc.                                           

                                          (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

                    Pennsylvania                                                       25-1424278                

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation                            (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

 or organization)                                                                  

Main & Franklin Streets, P.O. Box 430, Johnstown, PA   15907-0430

(Address of principal executive offices)                                                               (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code (814) 533-5300

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

                    X     Yes    

       No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).

                           Yes    

X     No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

               Class                           

      Outstanding at August 1, 2003    

Common Stock, par value $2.50

       13,944,685

per share                         

#

AmeriServ Financial, Inc.

                                          INDEX

      AmeriServ Financial, Inc.

                                                                    CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

AmeriServ Financial, Inc.

                                                CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

   (In thousands)                           

    Unaudited

CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS PAGE

(In thousands, except per share data)                           

 Unaudited

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

AmeriServ Financial, Inc.

                                    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

                                                                          (In thousands)

Unaudited

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

      AmeriServ Financial, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

                                                                                    (In thousands)

                                                                                        Unaudited

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

#

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of AmeriServ Financial, Inc. (the Company) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, AmeriServ Financial Bank (Bank), AmeriServ Trust and Financial Services Company (Trust Company), AmeriServ Associates, Inc., (AmeriServ Associates) and AmeriServ Life Insurance Company (AmeriServ Life).  The Bank is a state-chartered full service bank with 23 locations in Pennsylvania.  Standard Mortgage Corporation of Georgia (SMC), a subsidiary of the Bank, is a mortgage banking company whose business includes the servicing of mortgage loans. AmeriServ Associates, based in State College, is a registered investment advisory firm that provides investment portfolio and asset/liability management services to small and mid-sized financial institutions.  Amer iServ Life is a captive insurance company that engages in underwriting as a reinsurer of credit life and disability insurance.  The Trust Company offers a complete range of trust and financial services and has $1.1 billion in assets under management.  The Trust Company also offers the ERECT and BUILD Funds which are collective investment funds for trade union controlled pension fund assets.    

In addition, the Parent Company is an administrative group that provides support in such areas as audit, finance, investments, loan review, general services, and marketing. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in preparing the consolidated financial statements.  

2.

Basis of Preparation

The unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States for interim financial information. In the opinion of management, all adjustments that are of a normal recurring nature and are considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.  They are not, however, necessarily indicative of the results of consolidated operations for a full-year.

For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.

3.

Earnings Per Common Share

Basic earnings per share include only the weighted average common shares outstanding.  Diluted earnings per share include the weighted average common shares outstanding and dilutive common stock equivalent shares in the calculation.  Treasury shares are treated as retired for earnings per share purposes.  Options to purchase 288,776 and 459,967 shares of common stock were outstanding during the first six months of 2003 and 2002, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per common share as the options’ exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common stock for the respective periods.

Stock Based Compensation

Employee compensation expense under stock options is reported using the intrinsic value method.  The following pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per share assumes stock options granted subsequent to December 31, 1994, had been accounted for under the fair value method and the estimated fair value of the options is amortized to expense over the vesting period.  Compensation expense, net of related tax, of $35,000 and $18,000 for the six and three months ended June 30, 2003, and $29,000 and $15,000 for the six and three months ended June 30, 2002, respectively, is included in the pro forma net income as reported below.

The fair value was estimated at the grant dates using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions for June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively:  risk- free interest rates ranging from 2.97% to 3.37% and 4.34% to 5.07%, expected dividend yields zero and 5.29% to 5.90%, expected volatility ranging from 36.4% to 36.5% and 30.2% to 30.4%, expected lives of ten years for both periods.    

4.

Comprehensive Income

For the Company, comprehensive income primarily includes net income, unrealized holding gains and losses from available for sale investment securities and derivatives that qualify as cashflow hedges.  The changes in other comprehensive income are reported net of income taxes, as follows (in thousands):

5.

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

On a consolidated basis, cash equivalents include cash and due from banks, interest-bearing deposits with banks, and federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell.  For the Parent Company, cash equivalents also include short-term investments that have an overnight maturity.  The Company made $54,000 in income tax payments in the first six months of 2003 as compared to $573,000 for the first six months of 2002.  Total interest expense paid amounted to $17,214,000 in 2003's first six months compared to $22,236,000 in the same 2002 period.

6.

Investment Securities

Securities are classified at the time of purchase as investment securities held to maturity if it is management’s intent and the Company has the ability to hold the securities until maturity.  These held to maturity securities are carried on the Company’s books at cost, adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discount which is computed using the level yield method which approximates the effective interest method.  Securities classified as available for sale include securities which may be sold to effectively manage interest rate risk exposure, prepayment risk, and other factors (such as liquidity requirements).  These available for sale securities are reported at fair value with unrealized aggregate appreciation/(depreciation) excluded from net income and credited/( charged) to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within stockholders' equity on a net of tax basis. The mark-to-market of the available for sale portfolio does inject more volatility in the book value of equity, but has no impact on regulatory capital.  Realized gain or loss on securities sold was computed upon the adjusted cost of the specific securities sold.

The cost basis and market values of investment securities are summarized as follows (in thousands):

Investment securities available for sale:                          

(1)Other investment securities include corporate notes and bonds, asset-backed securities, and equity securities.

Investment securities held to maturity:                          

Investment securities available for sale:                          

(1)Other investment securities include corporate notes and bonds, asset-backed securities, and equity securities.

Maintaining investment quality is a primary objective of the Company's investment policy which, subject to certain limited exceptions, prohibits the purchase of any investment security below a Moody's Investor's Service or Standard & Poor's rating of "A."  At June 30, 2003, 97.4% of the portfolio was rated "AAA" compared to 94.1% at June 30, 2002. Approximately 1.0% of the portfolio was rated below "A" or unrated on June 30, 2003.

7.

Loans Held for Sale

At June 30, 2003, $3,228,000 of newly originated fixed-rate residential mortgage loans were classified as held for sale, because it is management's intent to sell these residential mortgage loans.  The residential mortgage loans held for sale are carried at the lower of aggregate cost or market value.  Net realized and unrealized gains and losses are included in "Net realized gains on loans held for sale"; unrealized net valuation adjustments (if any) are recorded in the same line item on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.  Management has identified potential embedded derivatives in certain loan commitments for residential mortgages where the Company has intent to sell to an outside investor.  Due to the short-term nature of these loan commitments (60 days or less) a nd the minimal historical dollar amount of commitments outstanding, the corresponding impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operation has not been material.

8.

Loans

The loan portfolio of the Company consists of the following (in thousands):

Real estate-construction loans comprised 4.5% of total loans net of unearned income at June 30, 2003.  The Company has no direct credit exposure to foreign countries.

9.

Allowance for Loan Losses and Charge-Off Procedures

As a financial institution which assumes lending and credit risks as a principal element of its business, the Company anticipates that credit losses will be experienced in the normal course of business.  Accordingly, the Company consistently applies a comprehensive methodology and procedural discipline to perform an analysis which is updated on a quarterly basis at the Bank level to determine both the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses and the necessary provision for loan losses to be charged against earnings. This methodology includes:

 * a detailed review of all criticized and impaired loans to determine if any specific reserve allocations are required on an individual loan basis.  The specific reserve established for these criticized and impaired loans is based on careful analysis of the loan's performance, the related collateral value, cash flow considerations and the financial capability of any guarantor.

*

the application of formula driven reserve allocations for all commercial and commercial real-estate loans are calculated by using a three-year migration analysis of net losses incurred within each risk grade for the entire commercial loan portfolio. The difference between estimated and actual losses is reconciled through the dynamic nature of the migration analysis.

* the application of formula driven reserve allocations to installment and mortgage loans which are based upon historical charge-off experience for those loan types. The residential mortgage loan allocation is based upon the Company's five-year historical average of actual loan charge-offs experienced in that category. The same methodology is used to determine the allocation for consumer loans except the allocation is based upon an average of the most recent actual three-year historical charge-off experience for consumer loans.

*

the application of formula driven reserve allocations to all outstanding loans is based upon review of historical losses and qualitative factors, which include but are not limited to: economic trends, delinquencies, concentrations of credit, trends in loan volume, experience and depth of management, regulatory examination and audit results, effects of any changes in lending policies and trends in policy, financial information and documentation exceptions.

*

the maintenance of a general unallocated reserve to accommodate inherent risk in the Company’s portfolio that is not identified through the Company’s specific loan and portfolio segment reviews discussed above.  Management recognizes that there may be events or economic factors that have occurred affecting specific borrowers or segments of borrowers that may not yet be fully reflected in the information that the Company uses for arriving at reserves for a specific loan or portfolio segment. Therefore, the Company and its Board of Directors believe a general unallocated reserve is needed to recognize the estimation risk associated with the specific and formula driven allowances.  In conjunction with the establishment of the general unallocated reserve, the Company also looks at the total allowance for loan losses in relation to the size of the total loan portfolio, the level of non-performing assets and its coverage of these items as compared to peer banks.

After completion of this process, a formal meeting of the Loan Loss Reserve Committee is held to evaluate the adequacy of the reserve.  The Company believes that this quarterly process is in compliance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and regulatory requirements.

When it is determined that the prospects for recovery of the principal of a loan have significantly diminished, the loan is immediately charged against the allowance account; subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance account. In addition, non-accrual and large delinquent loans are reviewed monthly to determine potential losses. Consumer loans are considered losses when they are 90 days past due, except loans that are insured for credit loss.

The Company's policy is to individually review, as circumstances warrant, each of its commercial and commercial mortgage loans to determine if a loan is impaired. At a minimum, credit reviews are mandatory for all commercial and commercial mortgage loans with balances in excess of $250,000 within a 12-month period.  The Company defines classified loans as those loans rated substandard and doubtful.  The Company has also identified two pools of small dollar value homogeneous loans which are evaluated collectively for impairment.  These separate pools are for residential mortgage loans and consumer loans.  Individual loans within these pools are reviewed and removed from the pool if factors such as significant delinquency in payments of 90 days or more, bankruptcy, or other negative eco nomic concerns indicate impairment.

An analysis of the changes in the allowance for loan losses follows (in thousands, except ratios):

(For additional information, refer to the "Provision for Loan Losses" and "Loan Quality" sections in the Management's Discussion and Analysis of Consolidated Financial Condition and Results of Operations on pages 26 and 34, respectively.)

10.

Components of Allowance for Loan Losses

For impaired loans, the measurement of impairment may be based upon:  1) the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate; 2) the observable market price of the impaired loan; or 3) the fair value of the collateral of a collateral dependent loan.   

The Company had loans totaling $14,133,000 and $11,442,000 being specifically identified as impaired and a corresponding reserve allocation of $1,973,000 and $877,000 at June 30, 2003, and June 30, 2002, respectively.  The average outstanding balance for loans being specifically identified as impaired was $11,995,000 for the six months of 2003 compared to $11,491,000 for the six months of 2002.  All of the impaired loans are collateral dependent, therefore the fair value of the collateral of the impaired loans is evaluated in measuring the impairment.  The interest income recognized on impaired loans during the six months of 2003 was $233,000, compared to $236,000 for the six months of 2002.

The following table sets forth the allocation of the allowance for loan losses among various categories.  This allocation is determined using the quarterly process which was discussed above. This allocation, however, is not necessarily indicative of the specific amount or specific loan category in which future losses may ultimately occur (in thousands, except percentages):

Even though residential real estate-mortgage loans comprise approximately 40% of the Company's total loan portfolio, only $425,000 or 3.6% of the total allowance for loan losses is allocated against this loan category.  The residential real estate-mortgage loan allocation is based upon the Company's five-year historical average of actual loan charge-offs experienced in that category and other qualitative factors.  The disproportionately higher allocations for commercial loans and commercial loans secured by real estate reflect the increased credit risk associated with this type of lending, the Company's historical loss experience in these categories, and other qualitative factors.  The Company has strengthened its allocations to the commercial and commercial real-estate components o f the loan portfolio during 2003 and 2002.  Factors considered by the Company that led to increased qualitative allocations to the commercial segments of the portfolio included:  the slowing of the national and regional economies and its corresponding impact on the Company’s loan delinquency trends, the increase in concentration risk among our 25 largest borrowers compared to total loans and the overall growth in the average size associated with these credits and a continued number of financial information and documentation exceptions that is sometimes symptomatic of borrower distress.

At June 30, 2003, management of the Company believes the allowance for loan losses was adequate to cover losses within the Company's loan portfolio.  The Company's management is unable to determine in what loan category future charge-offs and recoveries may occur.  (For a complete discussion concerning the operations of the "Allowance for Loan Losses" refer to Note #9.)

11.

Non-performing Assets

Non-performing assets are comprised of (i) loans which are on a non-accrual basis, (ii) loans which are contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest or principal payments some of which are insured for credit loss, and (iii) other real estate owned (real estate acquired through foreclosure, in-substance foreclosures and repossessed assets). Loans are placed on non-accrual status upon becoming 90 days past due in either principal or interest.  In addition, if circumstances warrant, the accrual of interest may be discontinued prior to 90 days.  In all cases, payments received on non-accrual loans are credited to principal until full recovery of principal has been recognized; it is only after full recovery of principal that any additional payments received are recognized as interest income .  The only exception to this policy is for residential mortgage loans wherein interest income is recognized on a cash basis as payments are received.  

The following table presents information concerning non-performing assets (in thousands, except percentages):

(For additional information refer to the "Loan Quality" section in the Management's Discussion and Analysis of Consolidated Financial Condition and Results of Operations on page 34.)

The Company is unaware of any additional loans which are required to either be charged-off or added to the non-performing asset totals disclosed above.  Other real estate owned is recorded at the lower of 1)fair value minus estimated costs to sell, or 2)carrying cost.

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, (i) the gross interest income that would have been recorded if non-accrual loans had been current in accordance with their original terms and had been outstanding throughout the period or since origination if held for part of the period, (ii) the amount of interest income actually recorded on such loans, and (iii) the net reduction in interest income attributable to such loans (in thousands).

12.

Derivative Hedging Instruments

The Company may use various interest rate contracts, such as interest rate swaps, caps, floors and swaptions to help manage interest rate and market valuation risk exposure, which is incurred in normal recurrent banking activities.  The Company uses derivative instruments, primarily interest rate swaps, to manage interest rate risk and match the rates on certain assets by hedging the fair value of certain fixed rate debt, which converts the debt to variable rates and by hedging the cashflow variability associated with certain variable rate debt by converting the debt to fixed rates.

Fair Value Hedge

In June 2003, the Company entered into an interest rate swap with a notional amount of $50 million, inclusive of a swaption feature, effectively hedging a $50 million FHLB convertible advance with a fixed cost of 6.10% that is callable quarterly with a seven-year maturity.   The Company will make variable rate payments based on 90-day LIBOR.  The swap is carried at its fair value and the carrying amount of the FHLB advance includes the change in their fair values since the inception of the hedge.  Because the hedge is considered highly effective, changes in the swap’s fair value exactly offset the corresponding changes in the fair value of the FHLB advance and as a result, the change in fair value does not have any impact on net income.  

Cashflow Hedge

In 2002, the Company had an interest rate swap agreement that effectively converted a notional amount of  $80 million from floating-rates to fixed-rates. The fair value of this $80 million swap was recorded in the Company's balance sheet, with the offset to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax.  This hedge matured on April 15, 2002.

The following table summarizes the interest rate transactions that impacted the Company’s six month 2003 and 2002 performance:

The Company believes that its exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by its counterparty (which is Regions Bank) in the interest rate swap agreement is remote.  The Company monitors and controls all derivative products with a comprehensive Board of Director approved hedging policy.  This policy permits a total maximum notional amount outstanding of $500 million for interest rate swaps, interest rate caps/floors, and swaptions.  All hedge transactions must be approved in advance by the Investment ALCO Committee of the Board of Directors.  The Company had no interest rate caps or floors outstanding for the periods presented.  

13.

Intangible Assets

The Company’s balance sheet shows both tangible assets (such as loans, buildings, and investments) and intangible assets (such as goodwill).  On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” under which goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized.  Such intangibles were evaluated for impairment as of January 1, 2002 (any such impairment at the date of adoption would have been reflected as a change in accounting principle).  In addition, each year, the Company will evaluate the intangible assets for impairment with any resulting impairment reflected as an operating expense.   The Company’s only intangible, other than goodwill, is its core depo sit intangible, which the Company currently believes has a finite life.  The Company completed its initial goodwill impairment test in the second quarter of 2002.  Due to specific triggering events, the Company also completed a goodwill impairment test as of September 30, 2002.  These evaluations indicated that there was no impairment of the Company’s goodwill.  

During the three month period ended March 31, 2003, under SFAS #142 the Company had a triggering event specific to the mortgage banking segment level.  This event was the sale of approximately 69% of its total servicing portfolio.  As a result, the Company reevaluated the $199,000 of goodwill that was allocated to the mortgage banking segment and determined that it was impaired based upon its analysis of the projected future cashflows in this business segment.  The resulting impairment charge eliminated all goodwill allocated to this segment and has been reflected as an operating expense for the six months ended June 30, 2003.  The Company’s remaining goodwill of $9.5 million is allocated to the retail banking segment and will be evaluated for impairment at its annual impairment evaluation date during the third quarter of 2003.

As of June 30, 2003, the Company’s core deposit intangibles had an original cost of $17.6 million with accumulated amortization of $12.2 million.   The weighted average amortization period of the Company’s core deposit intangibles at June 30, 2003, is 5.00 years. Amortization expense for the six months ended June 30, 2003 totaled $716,000. Estimated amortization expense for the remainder of 2003 and the next five years is summarized as follows (in thousands):     

14.

Federal Home Loan Bank Borrowings

Total Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) borrowings consist of the following at June 30, 2003, (in thousands, except percentages):

All of the above borrowings bear a fixed rate of interest until the next repricing period, with the only exceptions being the Open Repo Plus advances whose rate can change daily.  All FHLB stock along with an interest in certain mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities, with an aggregate statutory value equal to the amount of the advances, have been delivered as collateral to the FHLB of Pittsburgh to support these borrowings.

15.

Regulatory Matters

On February 28, 2003, the Company and the Bank entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (Federal Reserve) and the Pennsylvania Department of Banking (Department).  Under the terms of the MOU, the Company and the Bank cannot declare dividends, the Company may not redeem any of its own stock, and the Company cannot incur any additional debt other than in the ordinary course of business, in each case, without the prior written approval of the Federal Reserve and the Department.  Accordingly, the Board of Directors of the Company cannot reinstate the previously suspended common stock dividend, or reinstitute its stock repurchase program without the concurrence of the Federal Reserve and the Department.  Other provisions of the MOU require t he Company and the Bank to: (i) improve credit quality and credit administration practices, (ii) improve data security and disaster recovery procedures, (iii) make periodic reports to the Federal Reserve and the Department regarding compliance with the MOU, and (iv) appoint a committee of independent directors to monitor compliance with the MOU.  The MOU will remain in effect until modified or terminated by the Federal Reserve and the Department.

The Company is subject to various capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies.  Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Company's assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices.  The Company's capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgements by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.  Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company's consolidated fina ncial statements.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets, and of Tier 1 capital to average assets.  As of December 31, 2002, the Federal Reserve categorized the Company as Well Capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action.  To be categorized as well capitalized, the Company must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the table.

16.

Segment Results

The financial performance of the Company is also monitored by an internal funds transfer pricing profitability measurement system which produces line of business results and key performance measures.  The Company's major business units include retail banking, commercial lending to businesses, mortgage banking, trust, other fee based businesses and investment/parent.  The reported results reflect the underlying economics of the business segments.  Expenses for centrally provided services are allocated based upon the cost and estimated usage of those services.  Capital has been allocated among the businesses on a risk-adjusted basis with a primary focus on credit risk.  The businesses are match-funded and interest rate risk is centrally managed and accounted for within the investme nt/parent business segment.  The key performance measures the Company focuses on for each business segment are net income and risk-adjusted return on equity.

Retail banking includes the deposit-gathering branch franchise, lending to both individuals and small businesses, and financial services.  Retail banking lending activities include residential mortgage loans, direct consumer loans, and small business commercial loans.   Financial services include the sale of mutual funds, annuities, and insurance products.  Commercial lending to businesses includes commercial loans, commercial real-estate loans, and commercial leasing (excluding certain small business lending through the branch network). Mortgage banking includes the servicing of mortgage loans.

The trust segment has two primary business divisions, institutional trust and personal trust. Institutional trust products and services include 401(k) plans, defined benefit and defined contribution employee benefit plans, individual retirement accounts, and collective investment funds for trade union pension funds.  Personal trust products and services include personal portfolio investment management, estate planning and administration, custodial services and pre-need trusts.  Other fee based businesses include AmeriServ Associates and AmeriServ Life.  The investment/parent includes the net results of investment securities and borrowing activities, general corporate expenses not allocated to the business segments, interest expense on the guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures, and centralized interest rate risk management.  Inter-segment revenues were not material.

The contribution of the major business segments to the consolidated results for the three and six months periods of 2003 and 2002 were as follows (in thousands, except ratios):

17.

Commitments and Contingent Liabilities

The Company incurs off-balance sheet risks in the normal course of business in order to meet the financing needs of our consumers.  These risks derive from commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit.  The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to these commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by their contractual amounts.  The Company had various outstanding commitments to extend credit approximating $87.6 million and standby letters of credit of $4.1 million as of June 30, 2003.  Additionally, the Company is also subject to a number of asserted and unasserted potential claims encountered in the normal course of business.  In the opinion of the Company, neither the resolution of the se claims nor the funding of these credit commitments will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operation.

#

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL  CONDITION AND RESULTS OF  OPERATIONS

("M.D.& A.")

THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2003 VS. THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002

..... PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW..... The following table summarizes some of the Company's key performance indicators (in thousands, except per share and ratios).      

The Company reported net income for the second quarter of 2003 of $915,000 or $0.07 per diluted share.  When compared to net income of $408,000 or $0.03 per diluted share reported in the second quarter of 2002, this represents an increase of $507,000 or over 100%.  This financial performance reflects continued progress in the Company’s turnaround and the first quarter of profitability after net losses experienced in the three previous quarters.  Specifically, the Company reported a net loss of $4.2 million in the third quarter of 2002, a net loss of $2.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2002, and a net loss of $795,000 in the first quarter of 2003.  As a result of the positive second quarter 2003 performance, the Company is also now profitable for the six month period ended June 30, 2003 with net income of $120,000 or $0.01 per diluted share.    

.....NET INTEREST INCOME AND MARGIN..... The Company's net interest income represents the amount by which interest income on average earning assets exceeds interest paid on average interest bearing liabilities.  Net interest income is a primary source of the Company's earnings; it is affected by interest rate fluctuations as well as changes in the amount and mix of average earning assets and average interest bearing liabilities.  The following table compares the Company's net interest income performance for the second quarter of 2003 to the second quarter of 2002 (in thousands, except percentages):

N/M - not meaningful

The Company’s net interest income in the second quarter of 2003 decreased by $873,000 from the prior year second quarter due to a reduced level of earning assets and a 22 basis point decline in the net interest margin to 2.41%.   Loan portfolio shrinkage experienced in the first half of 2003 was the predominant factor contributing to both the lower level of earning assets and the net interest margin contraction.  The overall net decrease in loans reflects continuing prepayment pressures caused by the historically low interest rate environment and the Company’s internal focus on improving asset quality.  The Company completed the restructuring of its lending division during the second quarter of 2003 and is now better positioned to generate increased new loan production in th e second half of the year.  When analyzing more recent quarterly trends, both the net interest income and net interest margin declines were not as severe as the decline between the second quarters of 2002 and 2003.  Specifically, between the first and second quarter of 2003, the Company’s net interest income declined by $213,000 and the net interest margin dropped by seven basis points.    

...COMPONENT CHANGES IN NET INTEREST INCOME... Regarding the separate components of net interest income, the Company's total interest income for the second quarter of 2003 decreased by $2.8 million or 16.7% when compared to the same 2002 quarter. This decrease was due to a $41.4 million decline in average earning assets and an 83 basis point drop in the earning asset yield.  Within the earning asset base, the yield on the total investment securities portfolio dropped by 99 basis points to 4.22% while the yield on the total loan portfolio decreased by 65 basis points to 6.38%. Both of these declines reflect the lower interest rate environment in place in 2003 as the Federal Reserve reduced the federal funds rate by an unprecedented 550 basis points since 2001 in an effort to stimulate economic growth.  These significant rate reductions have caused accelerated asset prepayments as borrowers have elected to refinance their higher fixed rate loans into lower cost loans.  

The $41.4 million decline in the volume of average earning assets was due to a $58.1 million or 10.0% reduction in average loans outstanding which more than offset growth in both AFS and HTM investment securities.  The loan decline in the first quarter of 2003 reflects continuing prepayment pressures caused by the historically low interest rate environment as both commercial loans and residential mortgage loans experienced net paydowns.  The decline in commercial loans was also caused by reduced new loan production as the Company was inwardly focused on reorganizing its commercial lending division in the first half of 2003.  This reorganization included the hiring of a new chief lending officer in February of 2003 and the hiring of three experienced commercial lenders during the second qua rter of 2003.  The Company hopes to reverse this trend of net loan portfolio shrinkage during the second half of the year.   

The Company's total interest expense for the second quarter of 2003 decreased by $2.0 million or 20.2% when compared to the same 2002 quarter.  This reduction in interest expense was due to a lower volume of interest bearing liabilities and a reduced cost of funds. Total average interest bearing liabilities were $36.2 million or 3.6% lower in the second quarter of 2003 due to a $21.2 million decrease in average deposits and a $15.0 million decline in total borrowings.

The total cost of funds declined by 68 basis points to 3.22% and was driven down by a reduced cost of both deposits and borrowings.  Specifically, the cost of interest bearing deposits decreased by 78 basis points to 2.10% and the cost of FHLB advances and short-term borrowings declined by 58 basis points to 4.47%.  The lower deposit cost was caused by lower rates paid particularly for savings accounts and certificates of deposit.  The lower cost of borrowings reflects the downward repricing of maturing FHLB advances to lower current market rates as a result of the previously discussed decline in interest rates.  

The table that follows provides an analysis of net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis setting forth (i) average assets, liabilities, and stockholders' equity, (ii) interest income earned on interest earning assets and interest expense paid on interest bearing liabilities, (iii) average yields earned on interest earning assets and average rates paid on interest bearing liabilities, (iv) AmeriServ Financial's interest rate spread (the difference between the average yield earned on interest earning assets and the average rate paid on interest bearing liabilities), and (v) AmeriServ Financial's net interest margin (net interest income as a percentage of average total interest earning assets). For purposes of these tables, loan balances include non-accrual loans and interest income on loans includes lo an fees or amortization of such fees which have been deferred, as well as, interest recorded on non-accrual loans as cash is received.  Additionally, a tax rate of approximately 35% is used to compute tax equivalent yields.   

#

Three Months Ended June 30 (In thousands, except percentages)

…..PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES..... The Company’s provision for loan losses totaled $534,000 or 0.40% of total loans in the second quarter of 2003.  This represented a decrease of $281,000 from the second quarter 2002 provision of $815,000 or 0.56% of total loans.  The second quarter 2003 provision exceeded net charge-offs for the quarter that totaled $33,000 or 0.02% of total loans, which resulted in the Company further building its allowance for loan losses to $11.9 million at June 30, 2003.  

The actions taken to build the allowance for loan losses in 2003 reflect deterioration in credit quality that was evidenced by a higher level of classified loans and non-performing assets.  Classified loans totaled $32.8 million at June 30, 2003; an increase of $12.1 million or 58.6% from December 31, 2002.  This increased level of substandard credits was caused by rating downgrades on several loans in the hotel sector due to the continued weak economic environment.  Non-performing assets also increased from $7.0 million at December 31, 2002 to $10.2 million at June 30, 2003 due primarily to the transfer of a $4.8 million commercial mortgage loan into non-accrual status.  As discussed in the Company’s 2002 Annual Report and Form 10-K, this loan is to a borrower in the personal ca re industry and is supported by an 80% guarantee by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and is secured by a first mortgage on the personal care facility. As a result of the higher level of non-performing assets, the Company’s loan loss reserve coverage of non-performing assets amounted to 117% at June 30, 2003 compared to 144% at December 31, 2002 and 98% at June 30, 2002.  The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans, however, increased to 2.27% at June 30, 2003 compared to 1.75% at December 31, 2002 and 0.92% at June 30, 2002.  

    The Company applies a consistent methodology and procedural discipline to evaluate the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses on a quarterly basis. (See further discussion in Note #9 of the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Allowance for Loan Losses section of this MD&A.)    

.....NON-INTEREST INCOME..... Non-interest income for the second quarter of 2003 totaled $5.1 million; a $71,000 or 1.4% increase from the second quarter 2002 performance.  Factors contributing to the higher non-interest income in 2003 included:

* a $106,000 increase in gains realized on the sale of investment securities as the Company took advantage of the volatility in the market to shorten the investment portfolio duration and also capture profits on certain securities that had risks of accelerated prepayment in today’s low interest rate environment.    

* a $106,000 increase in deposit service charges due to higher levels of overdraft fees and checking service charges.

* a $183,000 decrease in other income resulting from the Company’s decision to exit the merchant card business in the fourth quarter of 2002 and reduced revenue generated from the sale of annuities due to the lower interest rate environment.  

.....NON-INTEREST EXPENSE..... Non-interest expense for the second quarter of 2003 totaled $9.8 million; a $1.3 million or 11.5% decrease from the second quarter 2002 performance. This decline contributed substantially to the Company’s increased quarterly earnings.  Factors contributing to the lower non-interest expense in 2003 included:

* the dramatic downsizing of the mortgage servicing asset in the first quarter of 2003 reduced the impact of lower mortgage rates on the Company’s performance.  Specifically, the Company’s impairment charge on mortgage servicing rights amounted to $254,000 in the second quarter of 2003; a reduction of $533,000 when compared to the $787,000 impairment charge recognized in the second quarter of 2002.  As a result of the sale of 69% of the Company’s mortgage servicing portfolio and the impairment charges recognized during the first half of 2003, the value of the Company’s mortgage servicing rights declined from $6.9 million at December 31, 2002 to $1.8 million at June 30, 2003.              

* salaries and employee benefits dropped by $411,000 or 8.0% as on average there were 42 fewer full time equivalent employees when compared to the second quarter of 2002. The lower salaries expense was partially offset by higher medical insurance costs as a result of premium increases and increased pension expense.  

* other expenses declined by $442,000 due to cost cutting in numerous expense categories some of the larger of which included advertising expense and merchant card expense.

* professional fees increased by $211,000 due to higher legal fees, auditing costs and regulatory related costs.

.....INCOME TAX EXPENSE..... The Company recognized an income tax expense of $294,000 or an effective rate of 24.3% in the second quarter of 2003.  The Company recognized a provision for income taxes of $52,000 or an effective tax rate of 11.3% in the second quarter of 2002.  The higher tax expense and effective rate in 2003 resulted from the Company’s increased level of pre-tax income.

SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2003 VS. SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002

.....PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW..... The following table summarizes some of the Company's key performance indicators (in thousands, except per share and ratios).      

The Company reported net income of $120,000 or $0.01 per diluted share in the first six months of 2003.  This performance was $914,000 or $0.07 per diluted share less than the first six months of 2002.  The lower net income and diluted earnings per share in 2003 was due primarily to an increased provision for loan losses, reduced net interest income, and a loss realized on the sale of a significant portion of its mortgage servicing asset.  These negative items were partially offset by reduced non-interest expenses and an income tax benefit realized in the first half of 2003.    

.....NET INTEREST INCOME AND MARGIN.....The following table compares the Company's net interest income performance for the first six months of 2003 to the first six months of 2002 (in thousands, except percentages):

N/M - not meaningful

The Company’s net interest income in the first six months of 2003 decreased by $809,000 or 5.8% from the same prior year period due to a $41.4 million reduction in the level of earning assets and a four basis point decline in the net interest margin to 2.45%.   The previously discussed loan portfolio shrinkage experienced in the first half of 2003 was the predominant factor contributing to both the lower level of earning assets and the net interest margin contraction.   Additionally, the net interest margin compression also reflects increased mortgage-related cash flows in the investment securities portfolio. This has reduced the securities portfolio yield due in part to accelerated amortization of premiums on mortgage-backed securities to correlate with the heightened prepayment s and the reinvestment of this cash into new shorter duration securities with lower yields.     

...COMPONENT CHANGES IN NET INTEREST INCOME... Regarding the separate components of net interest income, the Company's total interest income for the first six months of 2003 decreased by $5.4 million or 15.6% when compared to the same 2002 period. This decrease was due to a $41.4 million decline in earning assets and a 77 basis point drop in the earning asset yield to 5.46%.  Within the earning asset base, the yield on the total investment securities portfolio dropped by 89 basis points to 4.37% while the yield on the total loan portfolio decreased by 67 basis points to 6.42%.  Both of these declines reflect the lower interest rate environment in place in 2003 which has caused the downward repricing of floating rate assets and the reinvestment of cash received on higher yielding prepaying assets into assets with lower interest rates.  

The decline in the volume of earning assets was due to a $42.7 million reduction in average loans outstanding with decreases experienced in both the commercial and residential mortgage loan portfolios.  The reasons for the decline in commercial loans were previously discussed in the quarterly section of this MD&A.  The decline in residential mortgage loans was partially due to the Company’s decision to sell approximately $35 million or 69% of the new mortgage loan production into the secondary market for interest rate risk management purposes.      

The Company's total interest expense for the first six months of 2003 decreased by $4.6 million or 22.3% when compared to the same 2002 period.  This reduction in interest expense was due to a lower volume of interest bearing liabilities and a reduced cost of funds. Total average borrowed funds were $21.7 million lower in the first six months of 2003 as fewer borrowings were needed to fund a smaller earning asset base.  

The total cost of funds declined by 79 basis points to 3.31% and was driven down by a reduced cost of both deposits and borrowings.  Specifically, the cost of interest bearing deposits decreased by 77 basis points to 2.17% and the cost of short-term borrowings and FHLB advances declined by 87 basis points to 4.59%.  The April 15, 2002 maturity of an $80 million interest rate swap that had fixed the cost of certain FHLB borrowings at 6.92% was a key factor responsible for the reduced cost of borrowings.  Those hedged borrowings repriced to current market with a cost of approximately 1.5% in the first six months of 2003.  The lower deposit cost was caused by lower rates paid particularly for savings accounts and certificates of deposit.

The Company’s ratio of FHLB advances and short-term borrowings to total assets averaged 31.5% in the first six months of 2003 compared to 32.2% in the first six months of 2002. The total revenue contribution from leverage assets (including investment security gains) amounted to $2.3 million in the first half of 2003 compared to $1.5 million for the first half of 2002. The Company presently anticipates that the size of the leverage program in 2003 will be comparable with the full year 2002 average of $379 million or approximately 32% of total assets.  Longer-term, the Company would like to reduce the size of its leverage program to 25% of total assets.

The table that follows provides an analysis of net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and June 30, 2002.  For a detailed discussion of the components and assumptions included in the table, see the paragraph before the quarterly tables on page 24.   

#

Six Months Ended June 30 (In thousands, except percentages)

…..PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES..... The Company’s provision for loan losses totaled $2.2 million or 0.80% of total loans in the first six months of 2003.  This represented an increase of $838,000 from the first six months 2002 provision of $1.4 million or 0.47% of total loans.  The first six months 2003 provision exceeded net charge-offs for the same period that totaled $312,000 or 0.11% of total loans.  As a result of the provision exceeding net charge-offs, the balance in the allowance for loan losses increased by $1.9 million during the first half of the year to total $11.9 million at June 30, 2003.  This strengthening of the allowance for loan losses reflects the weak economic environment and was needed to address deterioration in credit quality that was evidenced by a higher level of classified loans and non-performing assets.

.....NON-INTEREST INCOME..... Non-interest income for the first six months of 2003 totaled $9.1 million; a $582,000 or 6.0% decrease from the first six months of 2002 performance.  Factors contributing to the lower non-interest income in 2003 included:

* a $758,000 loss realized in the first quarter of 2003 on the sale of approximately 69% of the Company’s mortgage servicing portfolio.  Largely as a result of this sale, the value of the Company’s mortgage servicing rights declined from $6.9 million at December 31, 2002 to $1.8 million at June 30, 2003.  This downsizing of the mortgage servicing asset reduces the level of interest rate risk and earnings volatility at the Company and contributes to a more conservatively positioned balance sheet.    

* a $747,000 increase in gains realized on the sale of investment securities as the Company took advantage of the volatility in the market to shorten the investment portfolio duration and also capture profits on certain securities that had risks of accelerated prepayment in today’s low interest rate environment.  These increased gains also helped offset the mortgage servicing impairment charge.  

* a $266,000 drop in revenue from bank owned life insurance due to the receipt of a death benefit for an employee insured under the program in the prior year.

* a $558,000 decrease in other income resulting from the Company’s decision to exit the merchant card business in the fourth quarter of 2002 and reduced revenue generated from the sale of annuities due to the lower interest rate environment.

.....NON-INTEREST EXPENSE..... Non-interest expense for the first six months of 2003 totaled $19.9 million; a $1.1 million or 5.2% decrease from the first six months of 2002 performance.  Factors contributing to the lower non-interest expense in 2003 included:

* salaries and employee benefits dropped by $767,000 or 7.5% as on average there were 42 fewer full time equivalent employees when compared to the first half of 2002. The lower salaries expense was partially offset by higher medical insurance costs as a result of premium increases and increased pension expense.  

* other expenses declined by $817,000 or 26.3% due to cost cutting in numerous expense categories some of the larger of which included advertising expense, merchant card expense, education expense, and business development expense.   

* the Company recognized a $199,000 goodwill impairment loss in the first quarter of 2003 due to the write-off of the goodwill associated with the mortgage banking segment.  This impairment loss was based upon the Company’s analysis of the projected future cashflows in this business segment along with the previously discussed downsizing of the mortgage servicing asset.

* professional fees increased by $364,000 or 22.8% due to higher legal fees, auditing costs and regulatory related costs.

Non-interest expenses, exclusive of the mortgage servicing rights and goodwill impairment charges, declined by $1.2 million from the first six months of 2002.  Overall, this resulted from the Company’s focus on reducing expenses as part of its earnings improvement program.  

Additionally, in the third quarter of 2002, the Company recognized a $920,000 restructuring charge associated with the implementation of the earnings improvement program.  At December 31, 2002, the Company had a remaining liability of $555,000 related to the restructuring charge that was recorded within other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet.  In the first six months of 2003, the Company paid $350,000 for items associated with the restructuring charge.  The remaining liability at June 30, 2003 totals $205,000.

.....INCOME TAX EXPENSE..... The Company recognized an income tax benefit of $48,000 in the first six months of 2003.  The Company recognized a provision for income taxes of $182,000 or an effective tax rate of 15.0% in the first half of 2002.  The Company’s recorded tax benefit in 2003 reflects the overall lower level of pre-tax earnings and the tax-free income the Company receives predominantly from bank owned life insurance. This more than offsets the non-deductibility of the goodwill impairment charge for tax purposes.

…..SEGMENT RESULTS.…. Note #16 of the Consolidated Financial Statements presents the results of the Company’s key business segments and identifies their net income contribution and risk-adjusted return on equity (ROE) performance for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002.  Retail banking was again the largest net income contributor earning $2.0 million or a 15.7% ROE in the first half of 2003.  The retail banking net income contribution is down $535,000 from the first six months of the prior year due to a higher allocated provision for loan losses and reduced net interest income.  The retail banking segment has benefited from lower non-interest expense and increased revenue resulting from higher deposit service charges.

The trust segment’s net income contribution in the first half of 2003 amounted to $420,000 or 26.8% ROE.  The trust segment is focused on continuing to increase the fee revenue generated from union business activities, particularly the ERECT and BUILD Funds, which are collective investment funds for trade union controlled pension fund assets.  The value of assets in these funds has increased by 10% during the first half of 2003 to $225.9 million and this has helped the trust segment keep its level of revenue consistent with the prior year.

The Company has experienced the greatest earnings pressure in the mortgage banking segment which lost $1.5 million in the first half of 2003 compared to a loss of $799,000 in the same 2002 period.  This negative performance reflects the previously discussed $758,000 loss realized on the sale of a significant portion of the Company’s mortgage servicing rights, a $620,000 mortgage servicing impairment charge and a $199,000 goodwill impairment loss.  This downsizing of the mortgage servicing asset, however, reduces the level of interest rate risk and earnings volatility at the Company.  

The commercial lending segment also lost $604,000 in the first half of 2003 compared to a positive net income contribution of $312,000 in the first half of 2002.  The loss in 2003 resulted primarily from an increased provision for loan losses and reduced net interest income due to fewer loans outstanding.  The net loss in the investment/parent segment was significantly reduced by $1.3 million in 2003 due to increased revenue earned on leverage assets as a result of higher investment security gains and the expiration of a cashflow hedge that had increased interest expense by $1.2 million in the first half of 2002.

.....BALANCE SHEET..... The Company's total consolidated assets were $1.168 billion at June 30, 2003, compared with $1.176 billion at December 31, 2002, which represents a modest decrease of $7.9 million or 0.70%. This lower level of assets resulted from a $47.4 million or 8.3% decline in total loans and loans held for sale resulting from the continuing prepayment pressures caused by the historically low interest rate environment and reduced new loan production.  Mortgage servicing rights dropped by $5.1 million or 74% due primarily to the completed sale of the servicing rights on approximately $450 million in mortgage loan principal values.  These items were partially offset by a $49.2 million increase in the investment securities portfolio as the cash generated from the net loan paydown s was redeployed into both AFS and HTM securities.       

The Company’s deposits totaled $661.9 million at June 30, 2003, which was $8.0 million or 1.2% lower than the December 31, 2002 level due to certificate of deposit run-off.  Total borrowed funds increased by $4.6 million in order to maintain the funding of the earning asset base.  Total stockholders equity decreased by $1.4 million as a result of a drop in accumulated other comprehensive income due to a lower value of the available for sale investment securities portfolio.  The Company continues to be considered well capitalized for regulatory purposes with an asset leverage ratio at June 30, 2003 of 7.10%, compared to a regulatory minimum of 5.0%.  The Company’s book value per share at June 30, 2003 was $5.48.   

 .....LOAN QUALITY..... The following table sets forth information concerning the Company’s loan delinquency and other non-performing assets (in thousands, except percentages):

     *Non-performing assets are comprised of (i) loans that are on a non-accrual basis, (ii) loans that are contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest and principal payments some of which are insured for credit loss, and (iii) other real estate owned.   

The $9.7 million decline in total loan delinquency between December 31, 2002 and June 30, 2003 was due to the transfer of a $4.8 million commercial mortgage loan into non-accrual status and reduced levels of commercial and residential mortgage loan delinquency.  The transfer of the $4.8 million commercial mortgage loan into non-accrual status was also the primary cause of the noted increase in non-accrual loans and non-performing assets and the corresponding ratios.  This loan is to a borrower in the personal care industry and is supported by an 80% guarantee by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and is secured by a first mortgage on the personal care facility.  The 20% unguaranteed portion was rated doubtful at June 30, 2003 and the Company had established an allocation of $500,000 within the allowance for loan losses for this credit.     

In addition to the non-performing assets, the Company is concerned with the performance of a $4.7 million commercial exposure to a borrower in the paper manufacturing industry.  As of July 31, 2003, the borrower is in default of their contractual payments.  It is possible that the default will continue and the loans could become a non-performing asset by September 30, 2003.  $3.7 million of this credit is supported by an 80% guarantee by the US Department of Agriculture and is secured by a first mortgage on the paper manufacturing facility.  The remaining portion of exposure represents balances outstanding under an asset-based line of credit that is secured by lock box receivables, inventory, and equity in a residential property.  At June 30, 2003, the Company had established an allocation of $596,000 within the allowance for loan losses for this credit.  

At all dates presented, the Company had no troubled debt restructurings that involve forgiving a portion of interest or principal on any loans or making loans at a rate materially less than that of market rates.        

.....ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES.....The following table sets forth the allowance for loan losses and certain ratios for the periods ended (in thousands, except percentages):

Since December 31, 2002, the Company’s loan loss reserve coverage of total non-performing assets declined to 117% due to the previously discussed increase in non-performing assets.  The allowance for loan losses to total loans and total delinquent loans ratios have increased to 2.27% and 145% respectively due to the net paydown of the loan portfolio and the building of the allowance for loan losses to address credit quality deterioration.  

.....INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY..... Asset/liability management involves managing the risks associated with changing interest rates and the resulting impact on the Company's net interest income, net income and capital.  The management and measurement of interest rate risk at the Company is performed by using the following tools:  1) simulation modeling which analyzes the impact of interest rate changes on net interest income, net income and capital levels over specific future time periods.  The simulation modeling incorporates changes in the absolute level of interest rates, the shape of the yield curve, prepayments and changes in the volumes and rates of various loan and deposit categories. The simulation modeling also incorporates all hedging activity as well as assumptions about re investment and the repricing characteristics of certain assets and liabilities without stated contractual maturities; 2) market value of portfolio equity sensitivity analysis, and 3) static "GAP" analysis which analyzes the extent to which interest rate sensitive assets and interest rate sensitive liabilities are matched at specific points in time.  The overall interest rate risk position and strategies are reviewed by senior management and the Company's Board of Directors on an ongoing basis.

Management places primary emphasis on simulation modeling to manage and measure interest rate risk.  The Company's asset/liability management policy seeks to limit net interest income variability over the first twelve months of the forecast period to +/- 7.5% based upon varied economic rate forecasts which include interest rate movements of at least 200 basis points.  Additionally, the Company also uses market value sensitivity measures to further evaluate the balance sheet exposure to changes in interest rates.  The Company monitors the trends in market value of portfolio equity sensitivity analysis on a quarterly basis.  

The following table presents an analysis of the sensitivity inherent in the Company’s net interest income and market value of portfolio equity.  The interest rate scenarios in the table compare the Company’s base forecast, which was prepared using a flat interest rate scenario, to scenarios that reflect immediate interest rate increases of 200 basis points and immediate interest rate decreases of 100 basis points.  Under the current historically low interest rate environment, a declining 200 basis point or greater scenario is improbable and therefore is of limited value.  Each rate scenario contains unique prepayment and repricing assumptions that are applied to the Company’s existing balance sheet that was developed under the flat interest rate scenario.

As indicated in the table, the maximum positive variability of the Company’s net interest income was 1.8% under an upward rate shock forecast reflecting a 200 basis point increase in interest rates.  Market value of portfolio equity increased by 61.0% under this same scenario due to increased value of the Company’s core deposit base. The maximum negative variability of net interest income and market value of portfolio equity occurred in a 100 basis point downward rate shock and reflects further impairment of the remaining mortgage servicing rights in a falling interest rate environment along with a reduced value for core deposits and a greater liability for fixed rate FHLB advances.  Net interest income in the declining rate forecast was also negatively impacted by the Company’s inability to further reduce certain core deposit costs given the historic lows of current interest rates.  Note that the fair value hedge executed in June 2003 helped reduce the Company’s exposure to flat and declining interest rates.  

.....LIQUIDITY...... Liquidity can be analyzed by utilizing the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. Cash equivalents increased by $1.0 million from December 31, 2002, to June 30, 2003, due to $4.6 million of cash provided by operating activities and $1.6 million of cash provided by investing activities.  This was partially offset by $5.1 million of cash used by financing activities.  Within investing activities, cash used to purchase new investment securities exceeded proceeds from investment security maturities and sales by $50.2 million.  Cash advanced for new loan fundings and purchases totaled $88.4 million and was $48.3 million less than the cash received from loan principal payments and sales.  Within financing activities, payments for maturing certificates of deposit ex ceeded proceeds from new certificates of deposit by $8.8 million.  

The Company used $1.5 million of cash to service the dividend on the guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (trust preferred securities) in the first six months of 2003. As a result of an income tax refund that was received in the second quarter of 2003, the Parent Company has ample available cash to continue to make the dividend payment on the trust preferred securities through the third quarter of 2003.  The Company presently anticipates that it will be able to upstream enough dividends from its non-bank subsidiaries to make the fourth quarter 2003 trust preferred dividend payment.  The payment of the trust preferred dividend beyond 2003 is dependent upon the subsidiary bank returning to consistent profitability so that it can resume upstreaming dividends to the Parent Company.  The subsidiary bank must first recoup the $2.6 million net loss that it incurred for the year ended December 31, 2002 before these dividend upstreams can resume.  Through June 30, 2003, the bank had earned $981,000 leaving a remaining loss to be recouped of $1.7 million.     

.....CONTRACTURAL OBLIGATIONS…..  As of June 30, 2003, the Company’s significant fixed and determinable contractual obligations are discussed in Note #14 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

.....CAPITAL RESOURCES..... As presented in Note #15 of the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company continues to be considered well capitalized as the asset leverage ratio was 7.10% and the Tier 1 capital ratio was 13.19% at June 30, 2003.  Note that the impact of other comprehensive income (loss) is excluded from the regulatory capital ratios. At June 30, 2003, accumulated other comprehensive income amounted to $4.2 million.  Additionally, the Company has generated approximately $716,000 of tangible capital in 2003 due to the amortization of core deposit intangible assets.  

The Company exceeds all regulatory capital ratios for each of the periods presented.  Furthermore, both the Company and the Bank are considered “well capitalized” under all applicable FDIC regulations.  The Company anticipates that it will build its capital ratios during the remaining six months of 2003.

As a result of the net loss incurred for the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company announced on January 24, 2003 that it suspended its common stock cash dividend.  The Company had declared and paid common stock cash dividends of $0.18 per share in the first half of 2002.  While the Company has not repurchased any of its own shares since the year 2000, the Company has also suspended its treasury stock repurchase program.  For so long as the Company and the Board of Directors are parties to the Memorandum of Understanding, reinstatement of either the common stock dividend or the treasury stock repurchase program will require the prior written approval of the Company’s primary regulators – the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia and the Pennsylvania Department of Banking.   ;(See Note #15, Regulatory Matters, for further discussion of the Memorandum Of Understanding.)

.....FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENT.....This Form 10-Q contains various forward-looking statements and includes assumptions concerning the Company’s beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, anticipations estimates, intentions, operations, future results, and prospects, including statements that include the words "may," "could," "should," "would," "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "estimate," "intend," "plan" or similar expressions.  These forward-looking statements are based upon current expectations and are subject to risk and uncertainties. In connection with the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the Company provides the follow ing cautionary statement identifying important factors (some of which are beyond the Company’s control) which could cause the actual results or events to differ materially from those set forth in or implied by the forward-looking statements and related assumptions.

Such factors include the following:  (i) the effect of changing regional and national economic conditions; (ii) the effects of trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System; (iii) significant changes in interest rates and prepayment speeds; (iv) inflation, stock and bond market, and monetary fluctuations; (v) credit risks of commercial, real estate, consumer, and other lending activities; (vi) changes in federal and state banking and financial services laws and regulations; (vii) the presence in the Company’s market area of competitors with greater financial resources than the Company; (viii) the timely development of competitive new products and services by the Company and the acceptance of those products and services by customers and regulators (when required); (ix) the willingness of customers to substitute competitors' products and services for those of the Company and vice versa; (x) changes in consumer spending and savings habits; (xi) unanticipated regulatory or judicial proceedings; and (xii) other external developments which could materially impact the Company's operational and financial performance.

The foregoing list of important factors is not exclusive, and neither such list nor any forward-looking statement takes into account the impact that any future acquisition may have on the Company and on any such forward-looking statement.

.....CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES..... (a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.  The Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-14(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended), based on their evaluation of these controls and procedures as of a date within (90) days prior to the filing date of this Form 10-Q, are effective.

(b) Changes in Internal Controls.  Except as discussed herein, there were no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of the date of the evaluation thereof, nor, except as noted herein,

were any corrective actions taken to address significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in internal controls.  The Company has identified material weaknesses in its credit administration processes.  In particular, the Company has concluded that, although its credit and credit administration policies are sound, adherence to these policies has not been consistent.  This resulted in incomplete or dated information in credit files.  The Company did, however, make a concerted effort in the fourth quarter of 2002 and first half of 2003 to obtain the most current information for the credit files.  The resulting analysis of this updated information led to a rating downgrade for numerous credits which contributed to an increased level of criticized and classified loans.  This det erioration of credit quality combined with continued economic weakness were factors that contributed to a significant addition to the allowance for loan losses in the fourth quarter of 2002 and first quarter of 2003.  

 In addition, the Company has implemented changes to more closely monitor adherence to credit and credit administration policies.  The Company has reviewed, redesigned and implemented procedures and processes to support these policies and strengthen credit controls.  Procedures that were initiated in the fourth quarter 2002 to obtain timely credit file information and to strengthen loan funding controls are being consistently applied on an ongoing basis.  These procedures and controls will support consistent adherence to sound credit and credit administration policies.

#

Part II     Other Information

Item 4.     Submission of matters to a Vote of Security Holders

The annual meeting of the shareholders of AMERISERV FINANCIAL, Inc. was held on April 22, 2003.  The result of the items submitted for a vote was as follows:

The Company received the following proposal from a private investor for submission of a vote:

That the stockholders of AMERISERV FINANCIAL, Inc. hereby request that the Board of Directors immediately engage the services of a professional advisory firm to develop a strategic direction for the Company that will enhance shareholder value.  The result of the vote was 6,708,661 FOR votes or 60.7% in favor of the proposal.

Item 5.     Other Information

The Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer have furnished to the SEC the certification with respect to this Form-Q that is required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Item 6.     Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

     (a)    Exhibits

     (b)    Reports on Form 8-K:  

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

#

I, Craig G. Ford, Chief Executive Officer of AmeriServ Financial, Inc. (ASF), certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ASF;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of ASF as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  ASF’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for ASF and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to ASF, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of ASF's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in ASF's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during ASF's most recent fiscal quarter (ASF's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, ASF's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  ASF's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to ASF's auditors and the audit committee of ASF's board of directors:

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect ASF's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in ASF's internal control over financial reporting.

I, Jeffrey A. Stopko, Chief Financial Officer of AmeriServ Financial, Inc. (ASF), certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ASF;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of ASF as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  ASF’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for ASF and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to ASF, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of ASF's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in ASF's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during ASF's most recent fiscal quarter (ASF's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, ASF's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  ASF's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to ASF's auditors and the audit committee of ASF's board of directors:

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect ASF's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in ASF's internal control over financial reporting.

#

STATEMENT OF MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY

August 6, 2003

To the Stockholders and

Board of Directors of

AmeriServ Financial, Inc.

Management of AmeriServ Financial, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) have prepared the consolidated financial statements and other information in the Form 10-Q in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and are responsible for its accuracy.

In meeting its responsibilities, management relies on internal accounting and related control systems, which include selection and training of qualified personnel, establishment and communication of accounting and administrative policies and procedures, appropriate segregation of responsibilities, and programs of internal audit.  These systems are designed to provide reasonable assurance that financial records are reliable for preparing financial statements and maintaining accountability for assets, and that assets are safeguarded against unauthorized use or disposition.  Such assurance cannot be absolute because of inherent limitations in any internal control system.

Management also recognizes its responsibility to foster a climate in which Company affairs are conducted with the highest ethical standards.  The Company's Code of Conduct, furnished to each employee and director, addresses the importance of open internal communications, potential conflicts of interest, compliance with applicable laws, including those related to financial disclosure, the confidentiality of propriety information, and other items.  There is an ongoing program to assess compliance with these policies.

The Audit Committee of the Company's Board of Directors consists solely of outside directors.  The Audit Committee meets periodically with management and the independent accountants to discuss audit, financial reporting, and related matters.  Deloitte & Touche LLP and the Company's internal auditors have direct access to the Audit Committee.

­­­­­­­

#

INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS’ REPORT

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

AmeriServ Financial, Inc.

Johnstown, Pennsylvania

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of AmeriServ Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of June 30, 2003, the related consolidated statements of operations for the three-month and six-month periods then ended, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the six-month period then ended.  These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures  and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters.  It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to such consolidated financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the consolidated balance sheets of the AmeriServ Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated January 31, 2003 (February 28, 2003 as to Notes 9 and 24), we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.  In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2002 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.  

/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

August 6, 2003

#

Exhibit 15.1

August 11, 2003

AmeriServ Financial, Inc.

216 Franklin St., P.O. Box 430

Johnstown, PA  15907

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial information of AmeriServ Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries for the period ended June 30, 2003, as indicated in our report dated August 6, 2003; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 33-56604 on Form S-3; Registration Statement No. 33-53935 on Form S-8; Registration Statement No. 33-55845 on Form S-8; Registration Statement No. 33-55207 on Form S-8; and Registration Statement No. 33-55211 on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

#

Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AmeriServ Financial, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Craig G. Ford, Interim Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1).

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2).

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/Craig G. Ford

Craig G. Ford

Chairman, President and

Chief Executive Officer

August 11, 2003

Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AmeriServ Financial, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey A. Stopko, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1).

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2).

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/Jeffrey A. Stopko

Jeffrey A. Stopko

Senior Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

August 11, 2003

#