Back to GetFilings.com

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003

OR

For the transition period from                                            to                                           

Commission file number 1-12991

BancorpSouth, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(662) 680-2000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

NOT APPLICABLE
(Former name, former address, and former fiscal year, if changed since last year)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  X  No      

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes  X  No      

As of August 8, 2003, the Registrant had outstanding 78,407,373 shares of common stock, par value $2.50 per share.

BANCORPSOUTH, INC.
CONTENTS

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements contained in this Report may not be based on historical facts and are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1993, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements may be identified by reference to a future period(s) or by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “may,” “might,” “will,” “intend,” “could,” “would,” “plan” or similar expressions. These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, those relating to BancorpSouth’s liquidity, earnings per share, allowance for credit losses, net interest revenue, mortgage servicing asset, life insurance premium revenue, loan demand, credit quality and credit losses, deposit withdrawals, net interest margin, acquisition of WMS, L.L.C., potential acquisitions, litigation contingencies, student loans, stock repurchase programs, capital resources, off-balance sheet entities or arrangements and BancorpSouth’s future growth and profitability. We caution you not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements contained in this Report, in that actual results could differ materially from those indicated in such forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors. These factors include, but are not limited to, changes in BancorpSouth’s operating or expansion strategy, changes in economic conditions, the ability to maintain credit quality, prevailing interest rates and government fiscal and monetary policies, effectiveness of BancorpSouth’s interest rate hedging strategies, changes in laws and regulations affecting financial institutions, ability of BancorpSouth to effectively service loans, ability of BancorpSouth to identify and integrate acquisitions and investment opportunities, cost or difficulties related to the integration of the business of BancorpSouth and WMS, L.L.C. may be greater than expected, manage its growth and effectively serve an expanding customer and market base, geographic concentrations of assets, availability of and costs associated with obtaining adequate and timely sources of liquidity, dependence on existing sources of funding, competition from other financial services companies, market conditions as they affect the ability of BancorpSouth to repurchase shares of its common stock, the effect of pending or future legislation, possible adverse rulings, judgments, settlements and other outcomes of pending litigation, other factors generally understood to affect the financial results of financial services companies and other factors detailed from time to time in BancorpSouth’s press releases and filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We undertake no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur after the date of this Report.

BANCORPSOUTH, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 - BASIS OF FINANCIAL STATEMENT PRESENTATION AND
PRINCIPALS OF CONSOLIDATION

The accompanying unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the accounting policies in effect as of December 31, 2002, as set forth in the annual consolidated financial statements of BancorpSouth, Inc. (the “Company”) as of such date. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated condensed financial statements have been included and all such adjustments were of a normal recurring nature. The results of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2003 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. Certain 2002 amounts have been reclassified to conform with the 2003 presentation.

The consolidated condensed financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, BancorpSouth Bank (the “Bank”), and the Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiaries, Century Credit Life Insurance Company, Personal Finance Corporation, BancorpSouth Mortgage Company, BancorpSouth Insurance Services, Inc., BancorpSouth Investment Services, Inc. and BancorpSouth Municipal Development Corporation. BancorpSouth Capital Trust I (“the Trust”), a business trust, is treated as a subsidiary of the Company for financial reporting purposes (See “Note 6 – Trust Preferred Securities” to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements).

NOTE 2 - LOANS

The composition of the loan portfolio by collateral type as of the date indicated is detailed below:

The following table presents information concerning non-performing loans as of the date indicated:

NOTE 3 - ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES

The following schedule summarizes the changes in the allowance for credit losses for the periods indicated:

NOTE 4 - PER SHARE DATA

The computation of basic earnings per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. The computation of diluted earnings per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the shares resulting from the assumed exercise of all outstanding stock options using the treasury stock method.

The following table provides a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per share computations for the periods shown:

NOTE 5 - COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

The following table presents the components of other comprehensive income and the related tax effects allocated to each component for the periods indicated:

NOTE 6 - TRUST PREFERRED SECURITIES

On January 28, 2002, BancorpSouth Capital Trust I (the “Trust”), a business trust which is treated as a subsidiary of the Company for financial reporting purposes, issued 5,000,000 shares of 8.15% trust preferred securities, $25 face value per share, due January 28, 2032 and callable at the option of the Company after January 28, 2007. Payment of distributions on the trust preferred securities is guaranteed by the Company, but only to the extent the Trust has funds legally and immediately available to make such distributions. The Trust invested the net proceeds of $121,062,500 in the 8.15% Junior Subordinated Debt Securities issued by the Company, which will mature on January 28, 2032. The net proceeds to the Company from the issuance of its Junior Subordinated Debt Securities to the Trust were used for general corporate purposes, including repurchase of shares of its outstanding common stock.

NOTE 7 - GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2003 were as follows:

The following table presents information regarding the components of the Company’s identifiable intangible assets for the periods indicated:

At June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, aggregate impairment for MSRs was approximately $26,766,000 and approximately $23,197,000, respectively.

The following table presents information regarding estimated amortization expense on the Company’s identifiable intangible assets for the year ended December 31, 2003, and the succeeding four years.

NOTE 8 - STOCK BASED COMPENSATION

At June 30, 2003, the Company had three stock-based employee compensation plans, which are the 1990 Stock Incentive Plan, the 1994 Stock Incentive Plan and the 1998 Stock Option Plan. The Company accounts for those plans under the recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations. No stock-based employee compensation cost is reflected in net income, as all options granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002.

NOTE 9 - RECENT PRONOUNCEMENTS

In July 2002, SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities,” was issued. SFAS No. 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recorded when it is incurred and can be measured at fair value. The statement was adopted by the Company effective January 1, 2003 and has had no material impact on the financial position or results of operations of the Company.

In November 2002, FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 45, “Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirement for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others,” was issued. FIN No. 45 elaborates on the disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements regarding its obligations under certain guarantees that it has issued. FIN No. 45 also clarifies the requirement of the guarantor to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. The initial recognition and initial measurement provisions of this interpretation were adopted by the Company effective January 1, 2003. The disclosure requirements of this interpretation were adopted by the Company effective December 16, 2002. The adoption of FIN No. 45 has had no material impact on the financial position or results of operations of the Company.

In January 2003, FIN No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” was issued. FIN No. 46 sets forth the criteria used in determining whether an investment in a variable interest entity (“VIE”) should be consolidated and is based on the general premise that companies that control another entity through interest other than voting interest should consolidate the controlled entity. The provisions of FIN No. 46 apply immediately for variable interests in VIE’s created or obtained after January 31, 2003. For variable interests in VIE’s created before February 1, 2003, the provisions of FIN No. 46 are to be applied in the first fiscal year or interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The adoption of FIN No. 46 is expected to have no material impact on the financial position or results of operations of the Company.

In April 2003, SFAS No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” was issued. SFAS No. 149 amends and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts (collectively referred to as derivatives) and for hedging activities under SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” SFAS No. 149 is effective for contracts and hedging relationships entered into, modified or designated after June 30, 2003. The provisions of SFAS No. 149 that relate to SFAS No. 133 Implementation Issues that have been effective for fiscal quarters that began prior to June 15, 2003 should continue to be applied in accordance with their respective effective dates. SFAS No. 149 was adopted by the Company effective June 30, 2003 and is expected to have no material impact on the financial position or results of operations of the Company.

In May 2003, SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity,” was issued. SFAS No. 150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. SFAS No. 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and for the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. SFAS No. 150 was adopted by the Company effective May 31, 2003 and is expected to have no material impact on the financial position or results of operations of the Company.

NOTE 10 - BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

On February 28, 2002, Pinnacle Bancshares, Inc., a bank holding company with $130 million in assets headquartered in Little Rock, Arkansas, merged with and into the Company. Pursuant to the merger, Pinnacle Bancshares’ subsidiary, Pinnacle Bank, merged into the Bank. Consideration given to complete this transaction consisted of 554,602 shares of the Company’s common stock in addition to cash paid to Pinnacle shareholders in the aggregate amount of $9,524,000. This transaction was accounted for as a purchase and, accordingly, the results of operations have been included since the date of acquisition. This acquisition was not material to the financial position or results of operations of the Company.

On May 3, 2002, the Company purchased certain assets of First Land and Investment Company. Consideration paid to complete this transaction consisted of 45,024 shares of the Company’s common stock. This transaction was accounted for as a purchase and, accordingly, the results of operations have been included since the date of acquisition. This acquisition was not material to the financial position or results of operations of the Company.

On May 1, 2003, the Company purchased certain assets of WMS, L.L.C., which operated under the name of Wright & Percy Insurance. Consideration paid to complete this transaction consisted of 426,309 shares of the Company’s common stock in addition to cash paid to WMS in the aggregate amount of approximately $9,711,000. Based on the performance of WMS over the next three years, the Company may have to pay an additional aggregate amount of up to $8,584,000 in cash to WMS in three annual installments. This transaction was accounted for as a purchase and, accordingly, the results of operations have been included since the date of acquisition. This acquisition was not material to the financial position or results of operations of the Company.

NOTE 11 - SEGMENT REPORTING

The Company’s principal activity is community banking, which includes providing a full range of deposit products, commercial loans and consumer loans. The general corporate and other operating segment includes leasing, mortgage lending, trust services, credit card activities, insurance services, investment services and other activities not allocated to community banking.

Results of operations and selected financial information by operating segment for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 are presented below:

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
                CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

BancorpSouth, Inc. (the “Company”) is a bank holding company headquartered in Tupelo, Mississippi. BancorpSouth Bank (the “Bank”), the Company’s banking subsidiary, has commercial banking operations in Mississippi, Tennessee, Alabama, Arkansas, Texas and Louisiana. The Bank and its consumer finance, credit life insurance, mortgage loan, insurance agency and brokerage subsidiaries provide commercial banking, leasing, mortgage origination and servicing, life insurance, brokerage and trust services to corporate customers, local governments, individuals and other financial institutions through an extensive network of branches and offices. BancorpSouth Capital Trust I, a business trust organized for the purpose of issuing preferred securities to the public, is treated as a subsidiary of the Company for financial reporting purposes (See “Note 6 – Trust Preferred Securities” to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements).

The following discussion provides certain information concerning the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements for the periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 found in “Item 1. Financial Statements” of this Report.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Summary

The Company’s net income for the second quarter of 2003 was $29.24 million, a decrease of 5.45% from $30.93 million in the second quarter of 2002. For the first six months of 2003, net income was $68.39 million, an increase of 13.37% from $60.32 million for the same period of 2002. Basic and diluted earnings per share for the second quarter of 2003 were $0.38 and $0.37, respectively, compared to basic and diluted earnings per share of $0.38 for the same period of 2002. For the six months ended June 30, 2003, basic and diluted earnings per share were $0.88, compared to basic and diluted earnings per share of $0.74 for the first six months of 2002. The annualized returns on average assets for the second quarter of 2003 and 2002 were 1.14% and 1.26%, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, the annualized returns on average assets were 1.35% and 1.25%, respectively.

Critical Accounting Policies

During the six months ended June 30, 2003, there was no material change in the Company’s critical accounting policies and no material change in the application of critical accounting policies as presented in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.

Net Interest Revenue

Net interest revenue is the difference between interest revenue earned on assets, such as loans, leases and securities, and interest expense incurred on liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings, and continues to provide the Company with its principal source of revenue. Net interest revenue is affected by the general level of interest rates, changes in interest rates and by changes in the amount and composition of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities. The Company’s long-term objective is to manage those assets and liabilities to maximize net interest revenue, while balancing interest rate, credit, liquidity and capital risks. For purposes of this discussion, interest revenue from tax-exempt loans and investment securities has been adjusted to a fully taxable equivalent basis, using an effective tax rate of 35%.

Net interest revenue was $89.64 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003, compared to $97.03 million for the same period in 2002, representing a decrease of $7.39 million, or 7.62%. For the first six months of 2003 and 2002, net interest revenue was $182.51 million and $192.43 million, respectively, representing a decrease of $9.93 million, or 5.16%.

Interest revenue decreased $16.01 million, or 10.55%, to $135.76 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003 from $151.77 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002. While average interest earning assets increased by $405.14 million, or 4.41%, to $9.59 billion for the second quarter of 2003 from $9.19 billion for the second quarter of 2002, the average yield of those assets declined by 95 basis points to 5.68% for the second quarter of 2003 from 6.63% for the second quarter of 2002. For the first six months of 2003 and 2002, interest revenue was $276.17 million and $304.30 million, respectively, representing a decrease of $28.13 million, or 9.24%. Average interest earning assets increased $465.79 million, or 5.13%, from $9.08 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2002 to $9.54 billion for the six months ended June, 30, 2003, while the average yield on those assets decreased 92 basis points to 5.84% for the six months ended June 30, 2003 from 6.76% for the six months ended June 30, 2002.

Interest expense decreased $8.62 million, or 15.74%, to $46.13 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003 from $54.74 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002. Average interest bearing liabilities increased $329.70 million, or 4.21%, to $8.17 billion for the second quarter of 2003 from $7.84 billion for the second quarter of 2002, while the average rate paid on those liabilities decreased 54 basis points to 2.26% for the second quarter of 2003 from 2.80% for the second quarter of 2002. For the first six months of 2003 and 2002, interest expense was $93.66 million and $111.86 million, respectively, representing a decrease of $18.20 million, or 16.27%. Average interest bearing liabilities increased $427.56 million, or 5.52%, from $7.74 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2002 to $8.17 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2003 while the average rate paid on those liabilities decreased 60 basis points from 2.91% for the six months ended June 30, 2002 to 2.31% for the six months ended June 30, 2003.

The relative performance of the asset deployment and funding functions are frequently measured by two calculations – net interest margin and net interest rate spread. Net interest margin is determined by dividing fully taxable equivalent net interest revenue by average earning assets. Net interest rate spread is the difference between the average fully taxable equivalent yield earned on interest earning assets and the average rate paid on interest bearing liabilities.

Net interest margin for the second quarter of 2003 and 2002 was 3.75% and 4.24%, respectively, representing a decrease of 49 basis points. Net interest rate spread for the second quarter of 2003 was 3.41%, a decrease of 42 basis points from 3.83% for the same period of 2002. Net interest margin for the first six months of 2003 was 3.86%, a decrease of 41 basis points from 4.27% for the same period of 2002. Net interest rate spread for the first six months of 2003 was 3.52%, a decrease of 32 basis points from 3.84% for the same period of 2002. The decline in net interest margin and net interest rate spread was due to a larger decrease in the average rate earned on interest earning assets, from 6.63% for the second quarter of 2002 to 5.68% for the second quarter of 2003, than the decrease in the average rate paid on interest bearing liabilities from 2.80% for the second quarter of 2002 to 2.26% for the second quarter of 2003. The narrowing of the Company’s net interest margin and net interest rate spread in 2003 compared to 2002 is primarily due to reduced loan activity in 2003 and lower yields on available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities in 2003. The absence of significant loan demand is attributable to the current economic environment in both our regional and the national markets. Absent the demand for loans, the Company invested in various securities that traditionally provide lower yields than loans and due to the lower prevailing interest rates during 2003, proceeds from maturing securities were typically reinvested at lower yields than the maturing securities were earning. Also contributing to lower yields on securities in 2003 was the sale in the first quarter of 2003 of approximately $720 million of available-for-sale securities. The proceeds from this sale were reinvested at lower yields than the sold securities were earning. The sale of these intermediate-term securities was part of the Company’s efforts to manage the interest rate sensitivity of its assets and liabilities.

Provision for Credit Losses

The provision for credit losses is the cost of providing an allowance or reserve for estimated probable losses on loans. The amount for each accounting period is dependent upon many factors, including loan growth, net charge-offs, changes in the composition of the loan portfolio, delinquencies, management’s assessment of loan portfolio quality, the value of collateral as determined by independent contractors and general economic factors. Future additions to the allowance for credit losses may be necessary based upon changes in these factors. The process of determining the adequacy of the provision requires that management make material estimates and assumptions that are particularly susceptible to significant change. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Company’s allowance for credit losses. These agencies may require the Company to recognize changes to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination.

The provision for credit losses totaled $6.47 million for the second quarter of 2003, compared to $7.22 million for the same period of 2002, representing a decrease of 10.30%. For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, the provision for credit losses totaled $12.99 million and $13.98 million, respectively, representing a decrease of 7.02%. The decrease in the provision for credit losses for the second quarter and first six months of 2003 when compared to the same periods of 2002 reflects the decline in loans charged off, net of recoveries, in 2003 when compared to 2002. Loans charged off, net of recoveries, decreased 20.02% in the second quarter of 2003 when compared to the same period of 2002. Loans charged off, net of recoveries, decreased 20.03% in the first six months of 2003 when compared to the same period in 2002. The decrease in the provision for credit losses for the second quarter of 2003 of approximately $743,000 from the provision for credit losses for the second quarter of 2002 is also reflective of the fact that the Company has experienced a decline in loans since the second quarter of 2002. The Company’s exposure to losses from indirect automobile sales financing also continues to diminish as that portfolio of loans totaled $39.66 million at June 30, 2003, $65.53 million at December 31, 2002 and $100.93 million at June 30, 2002. The Company’s allowance for credit losses as a percentage of loans outstanding at June 30, 2003 was 1.45%, at December 31, 2002 was 1.38% and at June 30, 2002 was 1.36%.

Other Revenue

Other revenue for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 totaled $42.92 million, compared to $32.82 million for the same period of 2002, an increase of 30.77%. For the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, other revenue was $97.93 million and $67.75 million, respectively, an increase of 44.55%. Revenue of $4.67 million from mortgage lending activities was recorded for the three months ended June 30, 2003, an increase of $3.77 million from $900,000 for the second quarter of 2002. For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, revenue from mortgage lending activities was $12.23 million and $6.45 million, respectively, an increase of 89.46%. The Company’s revenue from mortgage lending is primarily attributable to two activities, origination of new mortgage loans and servicing mortgage loans, and typically fluctuates as interest rates change. The Company’s normal practice is to generate mortgage loans, sell the loans in the secondary market and retain the servicing rights to the sold loans. The origination process generates loan origination fees and net gains or losses from the sale of the mortgage loans originated. The mortgage servicing rights are capitalized and carried as an asset by the Company at the lower of cost or fair value and represent the present value of the future stream of servicing fees expected to be earned over the estimated lives of the loans being serviced. The Company does not routinely hedge the value of its mortgage servicing asset, which is susceptible to significant fluctuations in value in changing interest rate environments. When interest rates decline, refinancing of home mortgages typically accelerates and the value of the Company’s mortgage servicing asset typically declines as the expected lives of the underlying mortgages shorten. When interest rates rise, refinancing of home mortgages typically declines and the value of the Company’s mortgage servicing asset typically increases as the expected lives of the underlying mortgages lengthen. During the second quarter of 2003 and 2002, mortgage revenue was reduced by $4.7 million and $4.2 million, respectively, as a result of impairment charges against the Company’s mortgage servicing asset. For the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, the reduction in mortgage revenue related to impairment charges against the Company’s mortgage servicing asset was $3.89 million and $3.62 million, respectively. Revenue from mortgage loan origination activities was $16.77 million for the first six months of 2003 compared to $8.64 million in the first six months of 2002, representing an increase of 94.18%. Mortgage loans originated during the second quarter of 2003 totaled $392.76 million compared to originations of $177.93 million during the second quarter of 2002, an increase of 120.74%.

Service charge revenue increased 28.88%, from $12.60 million for the second quarter of 2002 to $16.23 million for the second quarter of 2003, and increased 31.05%, from $22.81 million in the first six months of 2002 to $29.89 million in the first six months of 2003. The increase in service charges on deposit accounts is attributable to higher volumes of items processed, growth in the number of deposit accounts and fee increases. Life insurance premium revenue decreased by 19.71% for the second quarter of 2003 when compared to the second quarter of 2002 as the Company reduced its emphasis toward selling credit life insurance products. We expect this trend of declining life insurance premium revenue to continue. Insurance commissions increased 41.23%, from $5.89 million for the second quarter of 2002 to $8.31 million for the second quarter of 2003, and increased 27.25%, from $11.55 million in the first six months of 2002 to $14.70 million in the first six months of 2003. The increase in insurance commissions for the second quarter of 2003 compared to the respective period in 2002 is attributable to increased property and casualty commissions. The Company’s acquisition of certain assets of WMS, L.L.C. (See “Note 10 - Business Combinations” to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements) in the second quarter of 2003 was the primary factor contributing to the increases in the second quarter of 2003. Trust income from fiduciary activities was $1.68 million for the second quarter of 2003, an increase of 2.43% from $1.64 million reported in the second quarter of 2002.

Net security gains of approximately $180,000 were reported in the second quarter of 2003 compared to net security gains of $2.89 million for the second quarter of 2002, and net security gains were $13.74 million in the first six months of 2003 compared to $2.86 million in the first six months of 2002. The net security gains in the first quarter of 2003 were from the sale of approximately $720 million in intermediate term securities pursuant to our efforts to manage the interest rate sensitivity of the Company’s assets and liabilities. Other revenue for the second quarter of 2003 included a gain of approximately $122,000, and for the first six months of 2003 included a gain of $2.53 million, from the sale of an aggregate amount of $91.93 million in student loans originated by the Company. During the second quarter and first six months of 2002, an aggregate amount of $96.50 million in student loans were sold at a gain of $379,000 and $2.54 million, respectively. The Bank continues to originate student loans, which may result in subsequent periodic sales.

Other Expense

Other expense totaled $81.33 million for the second quarter of 2003, a 9.06% increase from $74.57 million for the same period of 2002. For the six months ended June 30, 2003, other expense totaled $160.96 million, a 6.07% increase from $151.75 million for the same period in 2002. Salaries and employee benefits expense for the second quarter of 2003 was $48.01 million, a 19.34% increase from $40.23 million for the second quarter of 2002, and for the first six months of 2003 was $93.47 million compared to $82.82 million in the first six months of 2002, an increase of 12.86%. This increase is attributable to increases in employee salaries and the cost of employee health care and other benefits, the addition of employees for locations added since the second quarter of 2002 and employees added through the acquisition of WMS, L.L.C. in the second quarter of 2003. Occupancy expense increased 3.45% to $5.61 million for the second quarter of 2003 from $5.42 million for the second quarter of 2002, and increased 4.80% to $11.19 million for the first six months of 2003 from $10.68 million for the first six months of 2002. This increase was primarily due to additional locations and facilities opened since June 30, 2002. Equipment expense of $5.78 million for the second quarter of 2003 represented a decrease of 7.79% when compared to equipment expense of $6.26 million for the second quarter of 2002. For the first six months of 2003, equipment expense was $11.78 million, a 7.97% decrease from $12.80 million for the first six months of 2002. The decrease is primarily attributable to decreases in equipment rental and maintenance expense. Telecommunications expense of $1.83 million for the second quarter of 2003 represented a decrease of 10.04% when compared to telecommunications expense of $2.03 million for the second quarter of 2002. For the first six months of 2003, telecommunications expense of $3.69 million represented a 6.80% decrease when compared to telecommunications expense of $3.96 million for the same period of 2002. This decrease is primarily attributable to decreased voice and data transmission expenses. The other components of other expense for the second quarter of 2003 totaled $20.11 million, a 2.51% decrease from $20.63 million for the second quarter of 2002, and for the first six months of 2003, the other components of other expense totaled $40.83 million when compared to $41.50 million for the first six months of 2002, a decrease of 1.60%. While some categories of other expense did increase due to normal increases in the cost of services and supplies, other categories of other expense decreased due to expense control efforts and resulted in an overall decrease in these other components of other expense.

Income Tax

Income tax expense was $12.94 million and $14.19 million for the second quarter of 2003 and 2002, respectively, representing a decrease of 8.79%. For the six-month period ended June 30, 2003, income tax expense was $32.81 million, compared to $28.21 million for the same period in 2002, representing an increase of 16.28%. The decrease for the second quarter of 2003 compared to the second quarter of 2002 is a function of decreased pretax income in the second quarter of 2003. The effective tax rates for the second quarter of 2003 and 2002 were 30.67% and 31.44%, respectively, while the effective tax rates for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 were 32.42% and 31.87%, respectively.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Earning Assets

The percentage of earning assets to total assets measures the effectiveness of management’s efforts to invest available funds into the most efficient and profitable uses. Earning assets at June 30, 2003 were $9.76 billion, or 92.32% of total assets, compared with $9.43 billion, or 92.52% of total assets, at December 31, 2002.

The securities portfolio is used to make various term investments, to provide a source of liquidity and to serve as collateral to secure certain types of deposits. Held-to-maturity securities at June 30, 2003 were $1.55 billion, compared with $1.19 billion at the end of 2002, a 30.06% increase. Available-for-sale securities were $1.72 billion at June 30, 2003, compared to $1.64 billion at December 31, 2002, a 4.97% increase.

The Bank’s loan portfolio makes up the single largest component of the Company’s earning assets. The Bank’s lending activities include both commercial and consumer loans. Loan originations are derived from a number of sources, including direct solicitation by the Bank’s loan officers, real estate broker referrals, mortgage loan companies, current savers and borrowers, builders, attorneys, walk-in customers and, in some instances, other lenders. The Bank has established disciplined and systematic procedures for approving and monitoring loans that vary depending on the size and nature of the loan. Loans, net of unearned discount, totaled $6.30 billion at June 30, 2003, which represents a 1.38% decrease from the December 31, 2002 total of $6.39 billion. We believe that the decline in loans is primarily attributable to the weak economic climate in both our regional and national economies. Management also continued its strategy to reduce the Company’s exposure to indirect automobile sales financing by allowing its portfolio of such loans to decline. Indirect automobile loans were $39.66 million at June 30, 2003, representing a decrease of $25.86 million from $65.53 million at December 31, 2002.

At June 30, 2003, the Company did not have any concentrations of loans in excess of 10% of total loans outstanding. Loan concentrations are considered to exist when there are amounts loaned to a multiple number of borrowers engaged in similar activities that would cause them to be similarly impacted by economic or other conditions. However, the Company does conduct business in a geographically concentrated area. Therefore, the ability of the Company’s borrowers to repay loans is to some extent dependent upon the economic conditions prevailing in the Company’s market area.

In the normal course of business, management becomes aware of possible credit problems in which borrowers exhibit potential for the inability to comply with the contractual terms of their loans, but which do not meet the criteria for disclosure as potential problem loans because, at this time, management does not have serious doubt as to the borrowers’ ability to comply with the loan terms. Historically, some of these loans are ultimately restructured or placed in non-accrual status.

Collateral for some of the Company’s loans is subject to fair value evaluations that fluctuate with market conditions and other external factors. In addition, while the Company has certain underwriting obligations related to such evaluations from a review standpoint, evaluations of some real property and other collateral are dependent upon outside independent appraisers employed either by the Company’s customers or as independent contractors of the Company.

The Company’s policy provides that loans, other than installment loans, are generally placed on non-accrual status if, in management’s opinion, payment in full of principal or interest is not expected, or when payment of principal or interest is more than 90 days past due, unless the loan is both well secured and in the process of collection. Non-performing loans were 0.72% of all loans outstanding at June 30, 2003 and 0.62% of all loans outstanding at December 31, 2002.

Allowance for Credit Losses

The Company maintains the allowance for credit losses at a level that, in the opinion of management, is adequate to meet the estimated probable losses on its current portfolio of loans. The process of determining the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses requires that management make material estimates and assumptions that are particularly susceptible to significant change. In employing its systematic methodology, the Company follows several processes to determine the allowance for credit losses.

The allowance for credit losses is based principally upon the Company’s loan classification system. The Company has a disciplined approach for assigning credit ratings and classifications to individual credits. Each credit is assigned a grade by the relevant loan officer, which serves as a basis for the credit analysis of the entire portfolio. The grade considers the borrower’s creditworthiness, collateral values, cash flows and other factors. An independent loan review department is responsible for reviewing the credit rating and classification of individual credits and assessing trends in the portfolio, adherence to internal credit policies and procedures and other factors that may affect the overall adequacy of the allowance. The loss factors assigned to each classification are based upon the attributes (loan to collateral values, borrower creditworthiness, etc.) of the loans typically assigned to each grade. Management periodically reviews the loss factors assigned in light of the general economic environment and overall condition of the loan portfolio and modifies the loss factors assigned to each classification as deemed appropriate. The overall allowance includes a component representing the results of other analyses intended to ensure that the allowance is adequate to cover other probable losses inherent in the portfolio. This component considers analyses of changes in credit risk resulting from different underwriting criteria in acquired loan portfolios, industry concentrations, changes in the mix of loans originated, overall credit criteria and other economic indicators. Future additions to the allowance may be necessary based on changes in economic conditions. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Company’s allowance for credit losses. These agencies may require the Company to record changes to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination.

The allocation of allowance by loan category is based, in part, on evaluations of specific loans’ past histories and on economic conditions within specific industries or geographical areas. Accordingly, because all of these conditions are subject to change, the allocation is not necessarily indicative of the breakdown of any future allowance or losses. The following table presents the allocation of the allowance for credit losses by loan category and the percentage of total loans for each category in the loan portfolio for the dates indicated:

Deposits and Other Interest Bearing Liabilities

Deposits originating within the communities served by the Bank continue to be the Company’s primary source of funding its earning assets. The Company has been able to effectively compete for deposits in its primary market areas. Deposits totaled $8.71 billion at June 30, 2003 as compared to $8.55 billion at December 31, 2002, representing a 1.93% increase. Non-interest bearing demand deposits increased by $104.72 million, or 8.85%, to $1.29 billion at June 30, 2003 from $1.18 billion at December 31, 2002, while interest bearing demand, savings and time deposits grew $60.43 million, or 0.82%, to $7.43 billion at June 30, 2003 from $7.37 billion at December 31, 2002.

Liquidity, Capital Resources and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

One of the Company’s goals is to provide adequate funds to meet changes in loan demand and increases in the normal level of deposit withdrawals. This goal is accomplished primarily by generating cash from operating activities and maintaining sufficient short-term liquid assets. These sources, coupled with a stable deposit base and a strong reputation in the capital markets, allow the Company to fund earning assets and maintain the availability of funds. Management believes that the Company’s traditional sources of maturing loans and investment securities, sales of mortgages held for sale, cash from operating activities and a strong base of core deposits are adequate to meet the Company’s liquidity needs for normal operations. To provide additional liquidity, the Company utilizes short-term financing through the purchase of federal funds and securities lending arrangements. Further, the Company maintains a borrowing relationship with the Federal Home Loan Bank which provides liquidity to fund term loans with borrowings of matched or longer maturities. Should the Company’s traditional sources of liquidity be constrained, forcing the Company to pursue avenues of funding not typically used, the Company’s net interest margin could be negatively impacted. The Company has not used in the past and does not expect to use in the future off-balance sheet entities to support the Company’s liquidity and capital needs. These entities are commonly referred to as special purpose entities and are often used as a mechanism to facilitate the sale of assets. The Company does utilize, among other tools, maturity gap tables, interest rate shock scenarios and an active asset and liability management committee to analyze, manage and plan asset growth and to assist in managing the Company’s net interest margin and overall level of liquidity. The Company’s approach to providing adequate liquidity has been successful in the past and management does not anticipate any near- or long-term changes to its liquidity strategies.

In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into various off-balance sheet commitments and other arrangements to extend credit, which are not reflected in the consolidated financial position of the Company. The business purpose of these off-balance sheet commitments is the routine extension of credit. While most of the commitments to extend credit are made at variable rates, included in these commitments are forward commitments to fund individual fixed-rate mortgage loans. These fixed-rate lending commitments expose the Company to risks associated with movements in interest rates. As a method to manage these risks, the Company also enters into forward commitments to sell individual fixed-rate mortgage loans. The Company also faces the risk of deteriorating credit quality of borrowers to whom a commitment to extend credit has been made; however, no significant credit losses are expected from these commitments and arrangements.

The Company is required to comply with the risk-based capital requirements of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. These requirements apply a variety of weighting factors, which vary according to the level of risk associated with the particular assets. At June 30, 2003, the Company’s Tier 1 capital and total capital, as a percentage of total risk-adjusted assets, were 12.92% and 14.18% respectively. Both ratios exceed the required minimum levels for these ratios of 4.0% and 8.0%, respectively. In addition, the Company’s Tier 1 leverage capital ratio (Tier 1 capital divided by total assets, less goodwill) was 8.59% at June 30, 2003, compared to the required minimum Tier 1 leverage capital ratio of 4%. The $125 million in trust preferred securities issued by the Company on January 28, 2002 qualifies as Tier 1 capital (See “Note 6 – Trust Preferred Securities” to the Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements).

The Company may pursue acquisition transactions of depository institutions and businesses closely related to banking which further the Company’s business strategies. The Company anticipates that a portion of the consideration for substantially all of these transactions, if any, would be shares of the Company’s common stock; however, transactions involving only cash consideration or other forms of consideration may also be considered.

On February 15, 2002, the Company announced a stock repurchase program whereby the Company may acquire up to 4.1 million shares of its common stock. The shares may be purchased from time to time in the open market at prevailing market prices or in privately negotiated transactions. The extent and time of any repurchase will depend on market conditions and other corporate considerations. This repurchase program is expected to be completed within 18 months from its announcement date. Repurchased shares will be held as authorized but unissued shares. These authorized but unissued shares will be available for use in connection with the Company’s stock option plans, other compensation programs, other transactions or for other corporate purposes as determined by the Company’s Board of Directors. During the second quarter of 2003, the Company did not repurchase any shares of its outstanding common stock. At June 30, 2003, the Company had repurchased a total of 3,869,108 shares under this repurchase program.

On April 23, 2003, the Company announced a new stock repurchase program whereby the Company may acquire up to 3.9 million shares of its common stock, in addition to the 230,892 shares that the Company had yet to repurchase as of June 30, 2003 pursuant to the common stock repurchase program authorized February 15, 2002. The shares may be purchased from time to time in the open market at prevailing market prices or in privately negotiated transactions during the period between May 1, 2003 and April 30, 2005. The extent and time of any repurchase will depend on market conditions and other corporate considerations. Repurchased shares will be held as authorized but unissued shares. These authorized but unissued shares will be available for use in connection with the Company’s stock option plans, other compensation programs, other transactions or for other corporate purposes as determined by the Company’s Board of Directors. As of June 30, 2003, no shares had been repurchased under this repurchase program.

The Company conducts its stock repurchase programs by using funds received in the ordinary course of business. The Company has not experienced a material effect on its capital resources or liquidity due to its repurchase of shares of its common stock, and does not expect to experience any material effects in connection with its stock repurchase programs during the terms of these programs. The stock repurchase programs may have a positive impact on the Company’s earnings per share depending on, among other things, prevailing interest rates and the prices at which shares are purchased under the stock repurchase programs.

Certain Litigation Contingencies

In some states in which the Company operates, and particularly in Mississippi, there has been a substantial increase in litigation against financial services companies in connection with lending, insurance and other financial transactions. While the allegations vary from case to case and from company to company, in general such cases allege that loans were originated or renewed at a time or in a way that improperly increased the charges paid by the borrower and/or that the borrowers were charged fees or sold insurance products without appropriate disclosures or which were unnecessary under the particular circumstances. These actions tend to seek large amounts of actual and punitive damages for claims arising out of transactions that involve relatively small amounts of money. There have been several cases involving such claims tried against other companies in the Company’s market area that have resulted in large awards of actual and punitive damages for individual claimants, but it is not clear whether such large awards will be upheld on appeal. Rather than face the risk and uncertainty of such awards, some companies have engaged in settlements of such cases.

Cases of this type have been filed against some of the Company’s subsidiaries. Such claims have been asserted by several hundred individuals in a number of cases filed in several different counties in Mississippi in which individuals have received large jury awards against other companies. Attorneys have actively advertised for such claimants in the past. Also, some of the attorneys who have already filed cases purport to represent hundreds of additional claimants for whom they have not yet filed proceedings. Thus, it is unknown whether or not the number of cases filed and the number of individuals asserting such claims will increase, but such is possible.

During the fourth quarter of 2002, the Company entered into two pending settlements with an expected total of approximately 1,800 individual claimants. Under the terms of these pending settlements, claimants whose loan documents contained arbitration agreements would receive smaller amounts to settle their claims than those whose loan documents did not contain arbitration agreements. The Company accrued $3.2 million during the fourth quarter of 2002, which the Company then believed was the amount needed to settle the claims covered in the settlements. These settlements were completed in the second quarter of 2003 with 1,712 individual claimants for approximately $2.8 million. The balance of the $3.2 million accrual was reversed in the second quarter of 2003.

As to similar claims, whether presently pending or that may be brought in the future, it is not currently possible to quantify the potential exposure presented by these claims or determine whether these claims will ultimately have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Company. The Company’s inability to determine its exposure at this time is based on a number of reasons, which include but are not limited to the following: some of the cases have only been recently filed, the facts vary from case to case and are usually disputed, some of the principles of law that apply to these cases are not clearly delineated, existing law provides juries little specific guidance to determine the amounts of actual and punitive damages they may award and/or to judges in reviewing those awards, and the amounts of jury awards differ from county to county and case to case. Future legislation and court decisions may also limit or affect the amount of damages that can be recovered in such cases; however, the Company cannot predict the course of any such legislation or court decisions or the effect that they may have with respect to litigation directed toward the Company and its subsidiaries.

Additionally, the Company and its subsidiaries are defendants in various other lawsuits arising out of the normal course of business, including claims against entities to which the Company is a successor as a result of business combinations. In the opinion of management, the ultimate resolutions of this category of claims should not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

During the six months ended June 30, 2003, there were no material changes to the quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risks presented in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

PART II
OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In some states in which the Company operates, and particularly in Mississippi, there has been a substantial increase in litigation against financial services companies in connection with lending, insurance and other financial transactions. While the allegations vary from case to case and from company to company, in general such cases allege that loans were originated or renewed at a time or in a way that improperly increased the charges paid by the borrower and/or that the borrowers were charged fees or sold insurance products without appropriate disclosures or which were unnecessary under the particular circumstances. These actions tend to seek large amounts of actual and punitive damages for claims arising out of transactions that involve relatively small amounts of money. There have been several cases involving such claims tried against other companies in the Company’s market area that have resulted in large awards of actual and punitive damages for individual claimants, but it is not clear whether such large awards will be upheld on appeal. Rather than face the risk and uncertainty of such awards, some companies have engaged in settlements of such cases.

Cases of this type have been filed against some of the Company’s subsidiaries. Such claims have been asserted by several hundred individuals in a number of cases filed in several different counties in Mississippi in which individuals have received large jury awards against other companies. Attorneys have actively advertised for such claimants in the past. Also, some of the attorneys who have already filed cases purport to represent hundreds of additional claimants for whom they have not yet filed proceedings. Thus, it is unknown whether or not the number of cases filed and the number of individuals asserting such claims will increase, but such is possible.

During the fourth quarter of 2002, the Company entered into two pending settlements with an expected total of approximately 1,800 individual claimants. Under the terms of these pending settlements, claimants whose loan documents contained arbitration agreements would receive smaller amounts to settle their claims than those whose loan documents did not contain arbitration agreements. The Company accrued $3.2 million during the fourth quarter of 2002, which the Company then believed was the amount needed to settle the claims covered in the settlements. These settlements were completed in the second quarter of 2003 with 1,712 individual claimants for approximately $2.8 million. The balance of the $3.2 million accrual was reversed in the second quarter of 2003.

As to similar claims, whether presently pending or that may be brought in the future, it is not currently possible to quantify the potential exposure presented by these claims or determine whether these claims will ultimately have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Company. The Company’s inability to determine its exposure at this time is based on a number of reasons, which include but are not limited to the following: some of the cases have only been recently filed, the facts vary from case to case and are usually disputed, some of the principles of law that apply to these cases are not clearly delineated, existing law provides juries little specific guidance to determine the amounts of actual and punitive damages they may award and/or to judges in reviewing those awards, and the amounts of jury awards differ from county to county and case to case. Future legislation and court decisions may also limit or affect the amount of damages that can be recovered in such cases; however, the Company cannot predict the course of any such legislation or court decisions or the effect that they may have with respect to litigation directed toward the Company and its subsidiaries.

Additionally, the Company and its subsidiaries are defendants in various other lawsuits arising out of the normal course of business, including claims against entities to which the Company is a successor as a result of business combinations. In the opinion of management, the ultimate resolutions of this category of claims should not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

The annual meeting of shareholders for the Company was held on Tuesday, April 22, 2003. At this meeting, the following matters were voted upon by the Company’s shareholders:

(a)    Election of Directors

Hassell H. Franklin, Robert C. Nolan, W. Cal Partee, Jr. and Travis E. Staub were elected to serve as Class I directors of the Company until the annual meeting of shareholders in 2006 or until their respective successors are elected and qualified. Guy W. Mitchell, III was elected to serve as a Class III director of the Company until the annual meeting of shareholders in 2004 or until his successor is elected and qualified. The vote was cast as follows:

The following directors continued in office following the meeting:

(b)    Selection of Independent Auditors

The shareholders of the Company ratified the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2003 by the following vote:

(c)    Approval of the BancorpSouth, Inc. Executive Performance Incentive Plan

The shareholders of the Company approved the adoption of the BancorpSouth, Inc. Executive Performance Incentive Plan which provides for the payment of cash incentive bonuses to participants based upon the achievement of performance goals established annually by the Executive Compensation and Stock Incentive Committee of the Board of Directors.

During the three months ended June 30, 2003, we filed or furnished the following current reports on Form 8-K:

A current report on Form 8-K was filed April 17, 2003, reporting under Item 7. “Financial Statements and Exhibits,” Item 9. “Regulation FD Disclosure” and Item 12. “Disclosure of Results of Operations and Financial Condition.”

A current report on Form 8-K was filed April 24, 2003, reporting under Item 5. “Other Events” and Item 7. “Financial Statements and Exhibits.”

A current report on Form 8-K was furnished May 5, 2003, reporting under Item 7. “Financial Statements and Exhibits” and Item 9. “Regulation FD Disclosure.”

An amended current report on Form 8-K was furnished May 7, 2003 amending the current report furnished on May 5, 2003, reporting under Item 9. “Regulation FD Disclosure.”

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

INDEX TO EXHIBITS