Back to GetFilings.com



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended Commission File 
September 30, 2003 No. 1-8019 

PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

Incorporated under IRS Employer I.D.
the Laws of Ohio No. 31-0982792 

One East Fourth Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
Phone: 513-579-2000

Indicate by check whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: Common stock, without par value, outstanding at October 31, 2003 is 48,895,784.

Please address all correspondence to:

Christopher J. Carey
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Provident Financial Group, Inc.
One East Fourth Street
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202

(1)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT

ON FORM 10-Q

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION  

   ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

      Consolidated Balance Sheets
      Consolidated Statements of Income
      Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity
      Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
      Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

   ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
           AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS 20

   ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
48

   ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
49

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

   ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
50

   ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
51

SIGNATURE
52

(2)


PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in Thousands)
September 30,
2003
(Unaudited)

December 31,
2002


ASSETS    
  Cash and Due from Banks $      288,176  $      351,994 
  Federal Funds Sold and Reverse Repurchase Agreements 341,833  188,925 
  Trading Account Securities 142,660  127,848 
  Loans Held for Sale 494,804  436,884 
  Investment Securities Available for Sale
   (amortized cost - $4,758,704 and $4,158,511) 4,731,323  4,215,238 
  Loans and Leases (Net of Unearned Income):
    Corporate Lending:
      Commercial 4,288,451  4,482,373 
      Mortgage 992,619  960,636 
      Construction 504,071  510,331 
      Lease Financing 1,304,659  1,273,901 
    Consumer Lending:
      Installment 1,573,782  1,306,761 
      Residential 26,812  599,793 
      Lease Financing 320,866 


        Total Loans and Leases 9,011,260  9,133,795 
    Reserve for Loan and Lease Losses (184,160) (201,051)


        Net Loans and Leases 8,827,100  8,932,744 
  Leased Equipment 1,825,721  2,350,356 
  Premises and Equipment 99,561  101,513 
  Goodwill 84,269  82,651 
  Other Assets 772,186  751,856 


TOTAL ASSETS $ 17,607,633  $ 17,540,009 


LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
  Liabilities:
    Deposits:
      Noninterest Bearing $   1,412,183  $   1,141,990 
      Interest Bearing 9,359,919  8,706,989 


        Total Deposits 10,772,102  9,848,979 
    Short-Term Debt 1,403,012  1,925,005 
    Long-Term Debt 3,476,460  3,842,657 
    Guaranteed Preferred Beneficial Interests in
     Company's Junior Subordinated Debentures 451,389  451,074 
    Minority Interest 160,966  160,966 
    Accrued Interest and Other Liabilities 451,294  430,957 


        Total Liabilities 16,715,223  16,659,638 
  Shareholders' Equity:
    Preferred Stock, 5,000,000 Shares Authorized,
     Series D, 70,272 Issued 7,000  7,000 
    Common Stock, No Par Value, 110,000,000 Shares
     Authorized, 48,884,612 and 48,760,462 Issued 14,492  14,454 
    Capital Surplus 301,737  298,025 
    Retained Earnings 634,018  604,013 
    Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, Net (64,837) (43,121)


        Total Shareholders' Equity 892,410  880,371 


TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY $ 17,607,633  $ 17,540,009 


See notes to consolidated financial statements.

(3)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
2003
2002
2003
2002
Interest Income:                    
Interest and Fees on Loans and Leases   $ 129,923   $ 149,743   $ 412,542   $ 453,445  
Interest on Investment Securities    43,025    52,401    142,952    162,589  
Other Interest Income    9,838    6,106    27,287    16,963  




Total Interest Income    182,786    208,250    582,781    632,997  
Interest Expense:  
Interest on Deposits:  
Savings and Demand Deposits    10,936    10,405    31,883    28,226  
Time Deposits    43,169    54,664    136,866    171,871  




Total Interest on Deposits    54,105    65,069    168,749    200,097  
Interest on Short-Term Debt    7,542    7,543    23,875    25,784  
Interest on Long-Term Debt    42,525    52,012    134,794    154,379  
Interest on Junior Subordinated Debentures    4,491    5,999    13,787    18,087  




Total Interest Expense    108,663    130,623    341,205    398,347  




Net Interest Income    74,123    77,626    241,576    234,649  
Provision for Loan and Lease Losses    11,919    23,532    80,909    81,312  




Net Interest Income After Provision  
for Loan and Lease Losses    62,204    54,094    160,667    153,337  
Noninterest Income:  
Service Charges on Deposit Accounts    12,933    11,681    37,656    33,045  
Loan Servicing Fees    6,925    9,018    27,013    25,430  
Commercial Mortgage Banking Revenue    10,095    5,365    31,241    17,132  
Other Service Charges and Fees    13,520    10,744    38,177    32,664  
Leasing Income    127,011    150,135    398,110    457,780  
Cash Gains on Sale of Loans    4,553    5,001    16,619    12,135  
Warrant Gains    -    -    1,636    8,186  
Net Security Gains    5,077    633    7,435    1,287  
Net Gain on Merchant Services Business    -    -    19,000    -  
Other    6,176    5,820    17,330    13,546  




Total Noninterest Income    186,290    198,397    594,217    601,205  
Noninterest Expense:  
Salaries, Wages and Benefits    60,737    57,141    188,544    172,260  
Charges and Fees    7,404    7,029    23,093    22,779  
Occupancy    6,224    5,861    18,916    17,829  
Leasing Expense    86,077    102,690    272,587    314,092  
Equipment Expense    6,398    5,680    20,171    17,862  
Professional Services    7,906    6,007    24,722    18,311  
Minority Interest Expense    3,197    3,223    9,591    3,889  
Disposition Cost of Subprime Loans    -    -    6,914    -  
Other    30,167    28,448    91,728    82,306  




Total Noninterest Expense    208,110    216,079    656,266    649,328  




Income Before Income Taxes    40,384    36,412    98,618    105,214  
Applicable Income Taxes    12,923    12,376    32,140    36,392  




Net Income   $ 27,461   $ 24,036   $ 66,478   $ 68,822  




Per Common Share:  
Basic Earnings Per Share   $ 0.56   $ 0.49   $ 1.35   $ 1.39  
Diluted Earnings Per Share    0.54    0.47    1.31    1.36  
Cash Dividends Paid    0.24    0.24    0.72    0.72  

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

(4)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(Unaudited)

(In Thousands)
Preferred
Stock

Common
Stock

Capital
Surplus

Retained
Earnings

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss, Net

Total
Balance at January 1, 2002     $ 7,000   $ 14,587   $ 322,024   $ 556,918   $ (98,696 ) $ 801,833  
Net Income                68,822        68,822  
Other Comprehensive Income,  
Net of Tax:  
Change in Unrealized  
Gains (Losses) on:  
Hedging Instruments                    (3,873 )  (3,873 )
Marketable Securities                    48,212    48,212  

Total Comprehensive Income                        113,161  
Dividends Paid on:  
Preferred Stock                (712 )      (712 )
Common Stock                (35,496 )      (35,496 )
Exercise of Stock Options and  
Accompanying Tax Benefits        54    3,190            3,244  
Benefit Plan Assets in  
Provident Stock        (232 )  (19,540 )          (19,772 )
Costs Associated with issuance  
of PRIDES Securities            (6,919 )          (6,919 )
Other            (24 )          (24 )






Balance at September 30, 2002   $ 7,000   $ 14,409   $ 298,731   $ 589,532   $ (54,357 ) $ 855,315  






Balance at January 1, 2003   $ 7,000   $ 14,454   $ 298,025   $ 604,013   $ (43,121 ) $ 880,371  
Net Income                66,478        66,478  
Other Comprehensive Income,  
Net of Tax:  
Change in Unrealized  
Gains (Losses) on:  
Hedging Instruments                    32,944    32,944  
Marketable Securities                    (54,660 )  (54,660 )

Total Comprehensive Income                        44,762  
Dividends Paid on:  
Preferred Stock                (712 )      (712 )
Common Stock                (35,713 )      (35,713 )
Exercise of Stock Options and  
Accompanying Tax Benefits        53    3,907            3,960  
Stock Options - Expensed            890            890  
Benefit Plan Assets in  
Provident Stock        (15 )  (1,085 )  (48 )      (1,148 )






Balance at September 30, 2003   $ 7,000   $ 14,492   $ 301,737   $ 634,018   $ (64,837 ) $ 892,410  






See notes to consolidated financial statements.

(5)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)

Nine Months Ended September 30,
(In Thousands)
2003
2002
Operating Activities:            
Net Income   $ 66,478   $ 68,822  
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to  
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities:  
Provision for Loan and Lease Losses    80,909    81,312  
Other Amortization and Accretion    55,325    15,282  
Depreciation of Leased Equipment    285,383    311,559  
Depreciation of Premises and Equipment    17,921    15,901  
Impairment Charge on Mortgage Servicing Assets    4,087    -  
Tax Benefit Received from Exercise of Stock Options    1,082    844  
Expensing of Stock Option Grants    890    -  
Realized Investment Security Gains    (7,435 )  (1,287 )
Proceeds from Sale of Loans Held for Sale    3,163,268    2,175,191  
Origination of Loans Held for Sale    (3,210,598 )  (2,136,513 )
Realized Gains on Loans Held for Sale    (10,590 )  (10,345 )
Increase in Trading Account Securities    (14,812 )  (88,702 )
(Increase) Decrease in Interest Receivable    (6,066 )  306  
(Increase) Decrease in Other Assets    (85,806 )  16,532  
Decrease in Interest Payable    (3,704 )  (1,337 )
Increase in Other Liabilities    70,867    18,053  


Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities    407,199    465,618  


Investing Activities:  
Investment Securities Available for Sale:  
Proceeds from Sales    2,441,696    1,022,535  
Proceeds from Maturities and Prepayments    1,510,504    818,741  
Purchases    (4,420,790 )  (2,411,298 )
(Increase) Decrease in Loans and Leases    24,316    (164,053 )
(Increase) Decrease in Operating Lease Equipment    239,252    (58,132 )
Increase in Premises and Equipment    (15,969 )  (13,819 )


Net Cash Used In Investing Activities    (220,991 )  (806,026 )


Financing Activities:  
Increase in Deposits    940,755    262,023  
Increase (Decrease) in Short-Term Debt    (594,757 )  1,406  
Principal Payments on Long-Term Debt    (410,254 )  (213,644 )
Proceeds From Issuance of Long-Term Debt    685    106,826  
Proceeds From Issuance of Minority Interest,  
Net of Transaction Costs    -    163,337  
Cash Dividends Paid    (36,425 )  (36,208 )
Proceeds from Exercise of Stock Options    2,878    2,400  
Net Decrease in Other Equity Items    -    (24 )


Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Financing Activities    (97,118 )  286,116  


Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents    89,090    (54,292 )
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period    540,919    501,223  


Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period   $ 630,009   $ 446,931  


Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:  
Cash Paid for:  
Interest   $ 344,908   $ 349,817  
Income Taxes    2,000    5,000  
Non-Cash Activity:  
Transfer of Loans and Leases to  
Other Nonperforming Assets    18,779    22,509  

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

(6)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, the results of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the periods presented. These financial statements have been prepared according to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission pertaining to Form 10-Q and, therefore, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) have been omitted. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Provident Financial Group, Inc. (Provident) and its subsidiaries. Investment in companies in which Provident has significant influence over operating and financing decisions (principally defined as owning a voting or economic interest of 20% to 50%) are accounted for by the equity method of accounting. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) issued Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46). FIN 46 provides guidance as to consolidation by business enterprises where ownership interests in an entity may vary over time or, in many cases, consolidation of special purpose entities. FIN 46 applies immediately to variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003 and for periods ending after December 15, 2003 for variable interest entities created prior to February 1, 2003. For further discussion of FIN 46, see “Note 2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements”.

Certain reclassifications have been made to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on net income.

The financial statements and notes thereto appearing in Provident’s 2002 annual report on Form 10-K, which include descriptions of significant accounting policies, should be read in conjunction with these interim financial statements.

(7)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 2. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In January 2003, the FASB issued FIN 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities”. FIN 46, which is an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51 (ARB 51), “Consolidated Financial Statements,” addresses consolidation by business enterprises where ownership interests in an entity may vary over time or, in many cases, consolidation of special-purpose entities (SPEs). To be consolidated for financial reporting, these entities must have certain characteristics. ARB 51 requires that an enterprise’s consolidated financial statements include subsidiaries in which the enterprise has a controlling financial interest. FIN 46 requires existing unconsolidated variable interest entities to be consolidated by their primary beneficiaries if the entities do not effectively disperse risks among the parties involved. An enterprise that holds significant variable interests in such an entity, but is not the primary beneficiary, is required to disclose certain information regarding its interests in that entity. FIN 46 applies immediately to variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003, and to variable interest entities in which an enterprise obtains an interest after that date. It also applies in the first fiscal year or interim period beginning after June 15, 2003, to variable interest entities in which an enterprise holds an interest that it acquired before February 1, 2003. Subsequently, FASB Staff Position FIN 46-6 was issued deferring the effective date for applying the provisions of FIN 46 to interests held in certain variable interest entities until the end of the first interim or annual period ending after December 15, 2003. As the securitization of its nonconforming residential, prime home equities and equipment leases involve the use of qualified special purpose entities as defined by Statement 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities,” which is excluded from FIN 46, these securitization entities will continue to be excluded from consolidation.

Provident holds various investments and is involved with various entities that, for purposes of FIN 46, are being evaluated to determine whether consolidation or further disclosure as a significant interest holder is required. Such interests subject to evaluation include low-income housing partnerships, equity funds, direct investments of equity securities and trust preferred securities. The adoption of FIN 46 is not expected to have a material impact on Provident’s results of operations or financial condition.

In April 2003, FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 149 “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” Statement 149 amends and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts and for hedging activities under Statement 133 “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” Statement 149 amends Statement 133 for decisions made (1) as part of the Derivatives Implementation Group process that effectively required amendments to Statement 133, (2) in connection with other FASB projects dealing with financial instruments, and (3) in connection with implementation issues raised in relation to the application of the definition of a derivative. Statement 149 is effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003, and hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. However, the provisions of Statement 149 that merely represent the codification of previous Derivatives Implementation Group decisions are already effective and should continue to be applied in accordance with their prior respective effective dates. The adoption of Statement 149 did not have a material impact on Provident’s results of operations or financial condition.

(8)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In May 2003, FASB issued Statement 150 “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity.” Statement 150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability. Many of those instruments were previously classified as equity. Statement 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. Restatement is not permitted. The adoption of Statement 150 did not have a material impact on Provident’s results of operations or financial condition.

NOTE 3. EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income, less dividend requirements on convertible preferred stock, by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share takes into consideration the pro forma dilution assuming the convertible preferred shares and the in-the-money outstanding stock options were converted or exercised into common shares. It also takes into consideration the dilutive impact of shares held in benefit plans and of forward purchase contracts required to be settled in Provident Stock. Net income is not adjusted for preferred dividend requirements.

Stock options to purchase approximately 4.5 million and 3.7 million shares of Common Stock were outstanding at September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options’ exercise price was not in-the-money and, therefore, the effect would be anti-dilutive. The PRIDES units were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share as these instruments had no dilutive impact.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share:

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
2003
2002
2003
2002
Basic:                    
Net Income   $ 27,461   $ 24,036   $ 66,478   $ 68,822  
Less Preferred Stock Dividends    (237 )  (237 )  (712 )  (712 )




Income Available to Common Shareholders    27,224    23,799    65,766    68,110  
Weighted-Average Common Shares Outstanding    48,830    48,616    48,792    48,828  




Basic Earnings Per Share   $ 0.56   $ 0.49   $ 1.35   $ 1.39  




Diluted:  
Net Income   $ 27,461   $ 24,036   $ 66,478   $ 68,822  
Weighted-Average Common Shares Outstanding    48,830    48,616    48,792    48,828  
Benefit Plans Common Shares    718    652    703    437  
Assumed Conversion of:  
Convertible Preferred Stock    988    988    988    988  
Dilutive Stock Options    349    471    290    491  




Dilutive Potential Common Shares    50,885    50,727    50,773    50,744  




Diluted Earnings Per Share   $ 0.54   $ 0.47   $ 1.31   $ 1.36  




  

(9)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 4. GUARANTEED PREFERRED BENEFICIAL INTERESTS IN COMPANY'S JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES

Wholly-owned subsidiary trusts of Provident have issued $462.5 million of preferred securities and, in turn, purchased $462.5 million of newly-authorized Provident junior subordinated debentures. The debentures provide interest and principal payments to fund the trusts’ obligations. Provident fully and unconditionally guarantees the preferred securities. Approximately $373 million of the preferred securities qualify as Tier 1 capital and the remainder qualifies as Tier 2 capital for bank regulatory purposes. The sole assets of the trusts are the debentures. The junior subordinated debentures consisted of the following at September 30, 2003:

(Dollars in Thousands)
Stated
Rate

Effective
Rate (1)

Maturity
Date

Amount
November 1996 Issuance      8.60 %  8.66 %  12/01/26   $ 99,034  
June 1999 Issuance    8.75 %  2.44 %  06/30/29    121,620  
November 2000 Issuance    10.25 %  3.81 %  12/31/30    109,344  
March 2001 Issuance    9.45 %  4.09 %  03/30/31    121,391  

Total               $ 451,389  

  
(1)

  Effective rate reflects interest rate after adjustment for notes issued at discount or premium, capitalized fees associated with the issuance of the debt and interest rate swap agreements entered to alter the payment characteristics.


NOTE 5. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Comprehensive income represents the changes in equity during a period except those resulting from investments by shareholders and distributions to shareholders. For Provident, components of comprehensive income include the unrealized gains/losses on securities available for sale and unrealized gains/losses on cash flow hedging derivatives (collectively known as other comprehensive income), as well as net income. A summary of activity in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) follows:

(10)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

(In Thousands)
2003
2002
Accumulated Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Securities Available            
for Sale at January 1, Net of Tax   $ 36,809   $ (15,953 )
Net Unrealized Gains/(Losses) for the Period, Net of Tax  
Expense/(Benefit) of $(16,458) in 2003 and $26,411 in 2002    (30,565 )  49,049  
Reclassification Adjustment for Gains Included in Net Income,  
Net of Tax Expense of $12,975 in 2003 and $450 in 2002    (24,095 )  (837 )


Effect on Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) for the Year    (54,660 )  48,212  


Accumulated Unrealized Gains on Securities Available  
for Sale at September 30, Net of Tax   $ (17,851 ) $ 32,259  


Accumulated Unrealized Losses on Derivatives Used in Cash  
Flow Hedging Relationships at January 1, Net of Tax   $ (79,930 ) $ (82,743 )
Net Unrealized Gains/(Losses) for the Period, Net of Tax  
Expense/(Benefit) of $8,880 in 2003 and $(18,475) in 2002    16,491    (34,310 )
Reclassification Adjustment for Losses Included in Net Income,  
Net of Tax Benefit of $8,859 in 2003 and $16,389 in 2002    16,453    30,437  


Effect on Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) for the Year    32,944    (3,873 )


Accumulated Unrealized Losses on Derivatives Used in Cash  
Flow Hedging Relationships at September 30, Net of Tax   $ (46,986 ) $ (86,616 )


Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss at January 1, Net of Tax   $ (43,121 ) $ (98,696 )
Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss), Net of Tax    (21,716 )  44,339  


Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss at September 30, Net of T   $ (64,837 ) $ (54,357 )


NOTE 6. LINE OF BUSINESS REPORTING

Provident’s three major business lines, referred to as Commercial Banking, Retail Banking and Mortgage Banking, are based on the products and services offered. Commercial Banking offers a broad range of commercial lending and financial products and services to corporate businesses. Retail Banking provides consumer lending, deposit accounts, trust, brokerage and investment products and services to consumers and small businesses. Mortgage Banking offers conforming and nonconforming residential mortgage loans to consumers, and also provides fee-based loan processing, loan warehousing and servicing for third party originators.

Financial results are determined based on an assignment of balance sheet and income statement items to each business line. Equity allocations are made based on various risk measurements of the business line. A matched funded transfer pricing process is used to allocate interest income and expense among the business lines. Provision for loan and lease losses is charged to each business line based on its level of net charge-offs and the size and risk of its lending portfolio. Activity-based costing is used to allocate expenses for centrally provided services.

Condensed income statements and total assets are provided below for Provident’s three major lines of business for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2003 and 2002. Corporate Center represents income and expenses not allocated to the major business lines operational activities, and gain/loss on the sale of investment securities.

(11)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in Millions)
Commercial
Banking

Retail
Banking

Mortgage
Banking

Corporate
Center

Total
Three Months Ended September 30 2003:                        
Net Interest Income   $ 44.5   $ 16.0   $ 13.6   $ -   $ 74.1  
Provision for Loan Losses    (9.9 )  (2.6 )  0.6    -    (11.9 )
Noninterest Income    46.5    125.5    9.2    5.1    186.3  
Noninterest Expense    (59.2 )  (127.4 )  (21.5 )  -    (208.1 )
Income Taxes    (7.0 )  (3.7 )  (0.6 )  (1.6 )  (12.9 )





Net Income   $ 14.9   $ 7.8   $ 1.3   $ 3.5   $ 27.5  





Three Months Ended September 30 2002:      
Net Interest Income   $ 55.2   $ 6.8   $ 15.6   $ -   $ 77.6  
Provision for Loan Losses    (16.8 )  (2.1 )  (4.6 )  -    (23.5 )
Noninterest Income    34.9    151.0    11.9    0.6    198.4  
Noninterest Expense    (51.9 )  (146.8 )  (17.4 )  -    (216.1 )
Income Taxes    (7.3 )  (3.0 )  (1.9 )  (0.2 )  (12.4 )





Net Income   $ 14.1   $ 5.9   $ 3.6   $ 0.4   $ 24.0  





Nine Months Ended September 30 2003:      
Net Interest Income   $ 145.5   $ 45.8   $ 50.3   $ -   $ 241.6  
Provision for Loan Losses    (30.6 )  (7.6 )  (9.5 )  (33.2 )  (80.9 )
Noninterest Income    133.7    400.4    33.7    26.4    594.2  
Noninterest Expense    (177.7 )  (408.1 )  (63.6 )  (6.9 )  (656.3 )
Income Taxes    (23.2 )  (9.9 )  (3.6 )  4.6    (32.1 )





Net Income   $ 47.7   $ 20.6   $ 7.3   $ (9.1 ) $ 66.5  





Total Assets   $ 7,462   $ 4,776   $ 956   $ 4,414   $ 17,608  





Nine Months Ended September 30 2002:      
Net Interest Income   $ 165.9   $ 21.7   $ 47.0   $ -   $ 234.6  
Provision for Loan Losses    (48.8 )  (9.7 )  (13.8 )  (9.0 )  (81.3 )
Noninterest Income    109.0    455.0    27.7    9.5    601.2  
Noninterest Expense    (156.1 )  (441.8 )  (51.4 )  -    (649.3 )
Income Taxes    (24.1 )  (8.8 )  (3.3 )  (0.2 )  (36.4 )





Net Income   $ 45.9   $ 16.4   $ 6.2   $ 0.3   $ 68.8  





Total Assets   $ 7,324   $ 4,731   $ 1,561   $ 3,481   $ 17,097  





NOTE 7. LEASING

Provident originates leases which are classified as either finance leases or operating leases, based on the terms of the lease arrangement. When a lease is classified as a finance lease, the future lease payments, net of unearned income, and the estimated residual value of the leased property at the end of the lease term are recorded as an asset under Loans and Leases. The amortization of the unearned income is recorded as interest income. When a lease is classified as an operating lease, the cost of the leased property, net of depreciation, is recorded as Leased Equipment. Rental income is recorded as noninterest income while the depreciation on the leased property is recorded as noninterest expense. At the expiration of a lease, the property is sold or another lease agreement is initiated.

Lease Financing: Corporate lease financing includes the leasing of transportation, manufacturing, construction, communication, data processing and office equipment. Consumer lease financing is the leasing of automobiles. Automobile leases originated since February 1, 2003 are classified as finance leases while those originated prior to that date are classified as operating leases. The change in classification of the auto leases is the result of an alteration in the structure of residual insurance that Provident obtains on its auto leases.

(12)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The components of the net investment in lease financing at September 30, 2003 were as follows:

Corporate Lease Financing
Consumer
Lease
(In Thousands)
Mid-Ticket
Large-Ticket
Total
Financing
Rentals Receivable     $ 1,202,468   $ 161,489   $ 1,363,957   $ 238,897  
Estimated Residual Values    39,634    112,060    151,694    122,583  




     1,242,102    273,549    1,515,651    361,480  
Less: Unearned Income    (156,536 )  (54,456 )  (210,992 )  (40,614 )




   Net Carrying Value   $ 1,085,566   $ 219,093   $ 1,304,659   $ 320,866  




Leased Equipment: Leased equipment are assets which are subject to operating leases. Operating leases are comprised of transportation equipment, manufacturing equipment, data processing and office equipment to corporate clients and automobiles to consumers.

Provident has entered into sale-leaseback transactions utilizing its auto leases. At September 30, 2003, approximately $1.1 billion of outstanding auto leases, which represent assets under capital leases, were utilized in these transactions.

A summary of leased equipment at September 30, 2003 follows:

Corporate Leased Equipment
Consumer
Leased
Total
Leased
(In Thousands)
Mid-Ticket
Large-Ticket
Equipment
Equipment
Cost     $ 170,227   $ 205,481   $ 2,368,321   $ 2,744,029  
Accumulated Depreciation    (47,588 )  (59,934 )  (810,786 )  (918,308 )




   Net Carrying Value   $ 122,639   $ 145,547   $ 1,557,535   $ 1,825,721  




NOTE 8. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Provident adopted the provisions of Statements of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, “Business Combinations”, and No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, on January 1 2002. Under the new rules, goodwill and intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives are no longer amortized but are subject to annual impairment tests in accordance with Statement 142. Other intangible assets deemed to have limited lives continue to be amortized over their useful lives. Management performed an impairment test on its goodwill assets as of January 1, 2003 and determined that no impairment existed as of that date.

(13)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by business line for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, are as follows:

(In Thousands)
Commercial
Banking

Retail
Banking

Total
Balance at January 1, 2002     $ 39,825   $ 40,824   $ 80,649  
Goodwill Acquired During the Year    -    189    189  
Goodwill Recorded as a Result of Contingent  
Consideration being Recognized    1,594    219    1,813  



Balance at September 30, 2002   $ 41,419   $ 41,232   $ 82,651  



Balance at January 1, 2003   $ 41,419   $ 41,232   $ 82,651  
Goodwill Recorded as a Result of Contingent  
Consideration being Recognized    1,328    290    1,618  



Balance at September 30, 2003   $ 42,747   $ 41,522   $ 84,269  



As all of Provident’s other intangible assets have been determined to have limited lives, these assets have continued to be amortized as in the past. Intangible assets, along with accumulated amortization, is provided below:

(In Thousands)
Gross
Carrying
Value

Accumulated
Amortization

Net
Carrying
Value

Non-Contractual Customer Relationships     $ 21,997   $ 12,125   $ 9,872  
Purchased Core Deposits    1,429    1,340    89  



Balance at September 30, 2003   $ 23,426   $ 13,465   $ 9,961  



The estimated amortization of intangible assets for the next five years is $1.2 million for the remainder of 2003; $4.4 million for 2004; $3.1 million for 2005; $0.7 million for 2006; and $0.2 million for 2007.

NOTE 9. MORTGAGE SERVICING ASSETS

Provident recognizes the rights to service mortgage loans it does not own but services for others within Other Assets of its Balance Sheets. Mortgage servicing assets may be recognized (1) when mortgage loans are sold with servicing retained or (2) when mortgage loan servicing is purchased. When mortgage loans are sold with servicing retained, the carrying value of the loans is allocated between the loans sold and servicing assets retained based on the relative fair values of each. Mortgage servicing assets, when purchased, are initially recorded at cost. Mortgage servicing assets are carried at the lower of the initial carrying value, adjusted for amortization, or estimated fair value. Mortgage servicing assets are evaluated quarterly for impairment based on the fair value of those assets, using a disaggregated approach. The fair value of the mortgage servicing assets is determined by estimating the present value of future net cash flows, taking into consideration loan prepayments speeds, discount rates, servicing costs and other economic factors. The mortgage loan prepayment rate is the most significant factor driving the value of mortgage net servicing assets. Increases in mortgage loan prepayments reduce estimated future net servicing cash flows because the life of the underlying loan is reduced.

(14)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Changes in the net carrying value of mortgage servicing assets follows:

Nine Months Ended
September 30

(In Thousands)
2003
2002
Mortgage Servicing Assets:            
Balance at Beginning of Period   $ 111,690   $ 84,267  
Additions    62,998    36,004  
Amortization    (24,100 )  (12,608 )


Balance at End of Period   $ 150,588   $ 107,663  


Valuation Allowance:  
Balance at Beginning of Period   $ -   $ -  
Impairment Charges    (4,087 )  -  


Balance at End of Period   $ (4,087 ) $ -  


Net Carrying Value of Mortgage Servicing      
Assets at End of Period   $ 146,501   $ 107,663  


  

As of September 30, 2003, total mortgage loans serviced for others included $10.6 billion on commercial real estate property and $11.0 billion on residential property. Net mortgage servicing assets relating to commercial real estate loans and residential loans totaled $71.6 million and $74.9 million, respectively as of September 30, 2003. Impairment charges of $0.4 million were incurred on the commercial real estate servicing assets and $3.7 million on residential servicing assets during the third quarter of 2003. Impairment charges on mortgage servicing assets have been less significant for Provident than at some other mortgage servicers due to characteristics of the underlying loans being serviced. Most of the commercial real estate loans have lockout and prepayment penalties generally ranging from 5 to 9 years while the majority of the residential loans were acquired with interest rates at or near current levels.

NOTE 10. EQUITY INVESTMENTS

Provident invests in low income housing partnerships, equity funds and directly in equity securities, which are collectively referred to herein as equity investments. Equity investments, which are reported within Investment Securities Available for Sale and Other Assets, are carried at estimated fair value with changes in fair value recognized in noninterest income. The fair value of publicly traded investments are determined using quoted market prices less liquidity discounts. Liquidity discounts take into account the fact that Provident may not immediately realize such market prices due to regulatory, corporate and contractual sales restrictions. The estimated fair value of equity investments that are not publicly traded approximates cost including other than temporary valuation adjustments considered appropriate by management. During the first quarter of 2003, certain equity investments were determined to have incurred a total of $11.0 million of other than temporary impairment in their valuation based upon information received from the general partners of the equity funds and Provident’s internal analyses. This impairment charge was offset against other realized security gains. As of September 30, 2003 and 2002, Provident held equity investments with a carrying value of $60.8 million and $73.7 million, respectively.

(15)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 11. STOCK OPTIONS

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” encourages, but does not require, adoption of a fair value-based accounting method for stock-based employee compensation plans. Provident adopted the provisions of Statement 123 as of January 1, 2003. Under these rules, compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period equal to the fair value of stock-based compensation as of the date of grant. As Provident has elected to use the Prospective Method of expense recognition according to the transition rules of Statement No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure,” the adoption of Statement 123 applies only to options granted after December 31, 2002. Prior to January 1, 2003, Provident accounted for stock-based employee compensation plans in accordance with Accounting Principles Bulletin (APB) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”, whereby no compensation expense is recognized for the granting of stock options when the exercise price of the option equals the market price of the underlying stock at the date of grant.

For purposes of providing pro forma disclosures as if Statement 123 had been adopted as of its effective date (grants issued in fiscal years that begin after December 15, 1994), the fair value of stock options was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes option pricing model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility.

Provident recorded $890,000 ($741,000 after-tax) of stock-based compensation during the first nine months of 2003 while no compensation cost was recognized for stock option grants during 2002. Had compensation cost been determined for stock option awards based on the fair values at grant dates as discussed above, Provident’s net income and earnings per share would have been as follows:

Three Months Ended
September 30

Nine Months Ended
September 30

(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
2003
2002
2003
2002
Net Income as Reported     $ 27,461   $ 24,036   $ 66,478   $ 68,822  
Plus Stock-Based Compensation Recognized for  
Options Granted in 2003, Net of Related Tax    348    -    741    -  
Less Total Stock-Based Compensation for Options  
Granted Since 1994, Net of Related Tax    (1,497 )  (1,621 )  (4,765 )  (4,824 )




Pro-forma Net Income   $ 26,312   $ 22,415   $ 62,454   $ 63,998  




Earnings Per Share:  
Basic - As Reported   $ 0.56   $ 0.49   $ 1.35   $ 1.39  
Basic - Pro Forma    0.53    0.46    1.27    1.30  
Diluted - As Reported    0.54    0.47    1.31    1.36  
Diluted - Pro Forma    0.52    0.44    1.25    1.27  

(16)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 12. RESTRICTED ASSETS

Provident formed the subsidiaries listed below to account for and support the process of transferring, securitizing and/or selling vehicle and equipment leases. These subsidiaries are separate legal entities and each maintains books and records with respect to its assets and liabilities. The assets of these subsidiaries, which are included in the consolidated financial statements, are not available to secure financing or otherwise satisfy claims of creditors of Provident or any of its other subsidiaries.

The subsidiaries and their total assets as of September 30, 2003 follow:

(In Thousands)
Total Assets
Provident Auto Rental LLC 1999-1     $ 674,585  
Provident Auto Leasing Company    529,068  
Provident Auto Rental LLC 2000-1    338,727  
Provident Auto Rental LLC 2001-1    292,935  
Provident Auto Rental LLC 2000-2    148,152  
Provident Auto Rental Company LLC 1998-2    142,131  
Provident Auto Rental Company LLC 1998-1    128,226  
Provident Lease Receivables Company LLC    82,761  
  

The above amounts include items which are eliminated in the Consolidated Financial Statements.

NOTE 13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Commitments to extend credit are financial instruments in which Provident agrees to provide financing to customers based on predetermined terms and conditions. Since many of the commitments to extend credit are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Provident evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis.

A standby letter of credit is an irrevocable guarantee whereby Provident guarantees the performance of a customer to a third party in a borrowing arrangement. They are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper, bond financing, and similar transactions. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. Generally, Provident issues standby letters of credit for terms from six months to three years.

Provident’s commitments to extend credit and letters of credit which are not reflected in the balance sheet are as follows:

(In Millions)
September 30
2003

December 31
2002

Commitments to Extend Credit     $ 4,444   $ 2,887  
Standby Letters of Credit    271    274  
Commercial Letters of Credit    3    11  

(17)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Provident Bank (the Bank), a subsidiary of Provident, has issued a guarantee for Red Mortgage Capital, Inc. (Red Mortgage), a subsidiary of the Bank, to assist in its business activities. This guarantee was made to Fannie Mae. Red Mortgage is an approved Fannie Mae Delegated Underwriting and Servicing (DUS) mortgage lender. Under the Fannie Mae DUS program, Red Mortgage underwrites, funds and sells mortgage loans on multifamily rental projects. Red Mortgage then services these mortgage loans on Fannie Mae’s behalf. Participation in the Fannie Mae DUS program requires Red Mortgage to share the risk of loan losses with Fannie Mae. Under the loss sharing arrangement, Red Mortgage and Fannie Mae split losses with one-third of all losses assumed by Red Mortgage and two-thirds of all losses assumed by Fannie Mae. For Red Mortgage to participate in the loss sharing agreement, the Bank provided a guarantee to Fannie Mae that it would fulfill all payments required of Red Mortgage under the loss sharing arrangement if Red Mortgage fails to meet its obligations. As of September 30, 2003, Red Mortgage serviced loans with outstanding principal balances aggregating $3.6 billion under the DUS program. The guarantee will continue until such time as the loss sharing agreement is amended or that Red Mortgage no longer participates in the Fannie Mae DUS program. No liability is carried on the Bank’s balance sheet for this guarantee as a liability has been established for estimated losses on Red Mortgage’s balance sheet.

Provident and its subsidiaries are not parties to any pending legal proceedings other than routine litigation incidental to their business except for the following matters related to the restatements announced March 5, 2003, and April 15, 2003. The restatement of previously reported operating results announced on March 5, 2003, was attributed to unintentional errors in the accounting for nine auto lease financing transactions originated between 1997 and 1999.

Provident’s audit committee, through legal counsel, engaged the auditing firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for the purpose of conducting a review of the Company’s March 5, 2003 restatement. Provident’s management affirmed, based upon the review of its advisors, its prior conclusion that the accounting errors that led to the restatement were unintentional.

Several purported class-actions have been filed against Provident, its President, Robert L. Hoverson, its Chief Financial Officer, Christopher J. Carey, and their predecessors in those positions, on behalf of all purchasers of Provident securities from March 30, 1998 through March 5, 2003. Litigation has also been filed against Provident, its President, Robert L. Hoverson and its Chief Financial Officer, Christopher J. Carey plus PFGI Capital Corporation, a Provident subsidiary, and others on behalf of all purchasers of PRIDES in or traceable to a June 6, 2002 offering of those securities registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission and extending to March 5, 2003. That action alleges violations of securities laws by the defendants in Provident’s financial disclosures during the period from March 30, 1998 through March 5, 2003 and in the June 2002 offering. These actions are based upon circumstances involved in the restatement of earnings announced by Provident on March 5, 2003 and allege violations of federal securities laws by the defendants in Provident’s financial disclosures during the period from March 30, 1998 through March 5, 2003. They seek an unspecified amount of damages and, in two cases, reimbursement of all executive bonuses received during that period.

(18)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

These actions have been consolidated before Judge S. Arthur Spiegel of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio under the caption, Merzin v. Provident Financial Group, Inc., consolidated Civil Action Master File No. C-1-03-165. The Amended Consolidated Complaint was filed on August 22, 2003. Provident and the other Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint on November 5, 2003.

Several derivative actions have also been filed in federal and state courts on behalf of Provident versus Provident’s directors and others. These suits were also concerned with the restatements of earnings and allege that the defendants breached fiduciary duties owed to Provident and are responsible for the conditions that led to the restatements and failed to ensure that the accounting errors were prevented or detected. These actions seek recovery from the defendants of an unspecified amount of damages and reimbursement of all executive bonuses and stock options.

The derivative actions filed in federal court are pending before Chief Judge Walter Herbert Rice of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio under the captions, Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 572 Pension Fund v. Jack Cook, et al., Case No. C-1-03-168, and Peter Berg v. Jack M. Cook, et al., Case No. C-1-03-196. Motions to dismiss the federal court derivative actions were filed on behalf of all of the defendants on September 2, 2003. All proceedings in the derivative actions filed in state court have been indefinitely stayed by agreement of the parties and their respective legal counsel.

NOTE 14. SALE OF LOANS AND BUSINESS UNIT

During the second quarter of 2003, Provident completed the sale of $471 million of subprime residential mortgage loans and related assets, and also sold its Merchant Services business, a payment solutions provider for credit and debit card acceptance programs. The loans were sold at a $40 million net discount, of which $6.9 million was recorded as disposition cost in noninterest expense. The sale of the Merchant Services business resulted in a gain of $19 million.

NOTE 15. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

During the second quarter of 2003, Provident agreed to sell certain deposits, loans and bank branches to RBC Centura Bank, a subsidiary of Royal Bank of Canada. Provident will sell its 13 Florida branches, along with approximately $750 million of deposits and $350 million in loans which were primarily originated at its Florida offices. The transaction, which has received regulatory approval, is expected to close on November 21, 2003 and generate a pre-tax gain in excess of $70 million or $0.93 per share.

During late October and November 2003, Provident sold approximately $50 million of loans and leases. The loans and leases, which included approximately $38 million of nonperforming assets, were sold at a loss of approximately $19 million, or $0.25 per share prior to the impact from reducing related reserves.

(19)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

INTRODUCTION

Provident is a bank holding company headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio. Provident operates bank and other financial service subsidiaries principally in Ohio, northern Kentucky and southwest Florida. Principal products and services provided by Provident include commercial lending, lease financing, cash management, retail lending, deposit accounts, mortgage banking, brokerage services, investment products and trust services.

On July 10, 2003 Provident announced a number of strategic actions taken late in the second quarter to further align its core businesses with its corporate operating strategy. The Company further reduced its risk profile through the sale of $471 million of subprime residential mortgage loans, and also sold its Merchant Services business, a payment solutions provider for credit and debit card acceptance programs. The Company has also agreed to sell its 13 Florida branches, along with certain deposits and loans, primarily originated at these branches, to RBC Centura Bank, a wholly owned subsidiary of Royal Bank of Canada. The transaction has been approved by federal and state regulators and is expected to close in the fourth quarter of this year.

Forward-Looking Statements

This Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements that are subject to numerous assumptions, risks or uncertainties. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements may be identified by words such as estimates, anticipates, projects, plans, expects, intends, believes, should and similar expressions and by the context in which they are used. Such statements are based upon current expectations of the Company and speak only as of the date made. Actual results could differ materially from those contained in or implied by such forward-looking statements for a variety of factors including: sharp and/or rapid changes in interest rates; significant changes in the anticipated economic scenario which could materially change anticipated credit quality trends; changes by rating agencies in Provident’s debt rating; the ability to generate loans and leases; significant cost, delay in, or ability to execute strategic initiatives designed to grow revenues and/or manage expenses; consummation of significant business combinations or divestitures; and significant changes in accounting, tax, or regulatory practices or requirements and factors noted in connection with forward-looking statements. Additionally, borrowers could suffer unanticipated losses without regard to general economic conditions. The result of these and other factors could cause differences from expectations in the level of defaults, changes in risk characteristics of the loan and lease portfolio, and changes in the provision for loan and lease losses. Provident undertakes no obligations to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances arising after the date on which they are made.

(20)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Summary

The following table summarizes earnings components, earnings per share and key financial ratios:

(Dollars in Thousands, Three Months Ended
September 30,

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

Except Per Share Data)
2003
2002
Change
2003
2002
Change
Income Statement Summary:                            
Net Interest Income   $ 74,123   $ 77,626    (5 )% $ 241,576   $ 234,649    3 %
Noninterest Income    186,290    198,397    (6 )  594,217    601,205    (1 )
Total Revenue    260,413    276,023    (6 )  835,793    835,854    (0 )
Provision for Loan and Lease Losses    11,919    23,532    (49 )  80,909    81,312    (0 )
Noninterest Expense    208,110    216,079    (4 )  656,266    649,328    1  
Net Income    27,461    24,036    14    66,478    68,822    (3 )
Diluted Earnings Per Common Share    0.54    0.47    15    1.31    1.36    (4 )
Ratios Analysis:  
Return on Average Equity    12.91 %  11.33 %      10.10 %  10.90 %  
Return on Average Assets    0.62 %  0.59 %      0.50 %  0.56 %  

Third quarter 2003 earnings per diluted share and net income were $0.54 and $27.5 million, respectively, compared with $0.47 and $24.0 million in the third quarter of 2002. For the first nine months of 2003 earnings per diluted share and net income were $1.31 and $66.5 million, respectively, compared with $1.36 and $68.8 million for the same period in 2002. Returns on average equity and assets were 10.10% and 0.50%, respectively, for the first nine months of 2003 compared with 10.90% and 0.56% for the same period during 2002.

As noted earlier, during the second quarter Provident completed the sale of subprime residential mortgage loans that had been held in portfolio, and also sold its Merchant Services business. Management believes presenting financial information excluding these sales might be beneficial to the reader as it provides data that is more comparable to earlier periods contained in this document. Excluding both sales, Provident’s net income and earnings per share would have been $80.6 million and $1.59 for the first nine months of 2003. The following table presents financial information removing the impact of the sales.

(21)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

As Impact from Sale of
Excluding
Reported
(GAAP)

Subprime
Loans

Merchant
Services

Sales
(Non-GAAP)

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 20                    
Condensed Income Statement (In Thousands):  
Net Interest Income   $ 241,576   $ -   $ -   $ 241,576  
Provision for Loan and Leases Losses    (80,909 )  (33,225 )  -    (47,684 )
Noninterest Income    594,217    -    19,000    575,217  
Noninterest Expense    (656,266 )  (6,914 )  -    (649,352 )




Income Before Income Taxes    98,618    (40,139 )  19,000    119,757  
Applicable Income Taxes    (32,140 )  13,246    (6,270 )  (39,116 )




Net Income   $ 66,478   $ (26,893 ) $ 12,730   $ 80,641  




Other Data:  
Earnings Per Common Share - Diluted   $ 1.31   $ (0.53 ) $ 0.25   $ 1.59  
Return on Assets    0.50 %  (0.20 )%  0.10 %  0.61 %
Return on Equity    10.10 %  (4.09 )%  1.93 %  12.26 %
Net Charge Offs   $ 97,800   $ 49,225    n/a   $ 48,575  
Net Charge Offs to Average  
Loans and Leases (annualized)    1.44 %  n/a    n/a    0.71 %

Net interest income was $74.1 million and $77.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. This quarter’s net interest income and net interest margin were both negatively impacted by last quarter’s sale of $471.0 million of subprime residential mortgage loans. Net interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, increased $6.9 million, or 3%, compared to the first nine months of 2002. The increase in interest income was due to an increase in average earning assets of $1.6 billion, or 12%. The increase in average earning assets resulted primarily from the growth of home equity loans and investment securities. The growth in earning assets was primarily funded by a corresponding growth in demand and time deposits.

The provision for loan and lease losses was $80.9 million and $81.3 million for the first nine months of 2003 and 2002, respectively. Included in the provision for 2003 was approximately $33.2 million of provision related to the sale of subprime residential mortgage loans that occurred in the second quarter of 2003. The annualized net charge-off to average loans and leases ratio was 1.44% for the first nine months of 2003 compared to 1.81% for the same period in 2002. If the $49.2 million charge-off related to the residential mortgage loan sale were excluded, the net charge-off ratio for the first nine months of 2003 would have been 0.71%. Nonperforming assets at September 30, 2003 were $132.0 million compared to $182.2 million and $193.5 million as of December 31, 2002 and September 30, 2002, respectively. Nonperforming assets are at their lowest level in nearly two years due to management actions and the sale of the subprime residential mortgages. Reserve for loan losses to nonperforming assets was 139.56% as of September 30, 2003 compared to 110.34% and 105.84% as of December 31, 2002 and September 30, 2002, respectively.

Noninterest income decreased $7.0 million for the first nine months of 2003 as compared to the same period in 2002. Decreases in leasing income and lower warrant gains were offset by the gain on the sale of the Merchant Servicing business and an increase in commercial mortgage banking revenue. The decrease in leasing income was a result of amortization of the portfolio and because auto leases originated since February, 2003 have been classified as finance leases rather than operating leases. In February 2003, Provident changed the structure of the residual insurance it obtains on its auto leases resulting in this type of lending being classified as a direct financing lease in the loan category and income being recorded as interest income.

(22)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Noninterest expense increased $7.0 million, or 1%, for the first nine months of 2003 as compared to the same period in 2002. The increase in noninterest expense was primarily in the areas of salaries, professional services, and expenses related to the disposal of the subprime residential mortgage loans. These increases were partially offset by decreases in leasing and other real estate expenses. Similar to leasing income, leasing expense decreased due to the decrease in auto leasing activity, as well as auto leases originated since February 2003 being classified as finance leases rather than operating leases.

Total assets increased $67.6 million from December 31, 2002 to September 30, 2003 primarily as a result of an increase in investment securities and home equity loans. Partially offsetting these increases were reductions in nonconforming residential loans and commercial lending. The fluctuations in the loan and lease balances reflect management’s decision to reduce or exit loans with higher credit risk while growing those with lower credit risk. Total deposits increased $923 million during the first nine months of 2003. Average core deposits have increased 10% since the third quarter of 2002.

Business Lines

Provident’s major business lines are Commercial Banking, Retail Banking and Mortgage Banking. The following table summarizes net income by major lines of business for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2003 and 2002. Condensed income statements and total assets are provided in Note 6 of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements”.

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

(Dollars in Millions)
2003
2002
2003
2002
Commercial Banking     $ 14.9   $ 14.1   $ 47.7   $ 45.9  
Retail Banking    7.8    5.9    20.6    16.4  
Mortgage Banking    1.3    3.6    7.3    6.2  
Corporate Center    3.5    0.4    (9.1 )  0.3  




    $ 27.5   $ 24.0   $ 66.5   $ 68.8  




Key components of the management reporting process follows:

o    Risk-Based Equity Allocations: Provident uses a comprehensive approach for measuring risk and making risk-based equity allocations. Risk measurements are applied to credit, operational and other corporate-level risks.

(23)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

o    Transfer Pricing: Provident utilizes a matched funded transfer pricing methodology that in most cases isolates the business units from fluctuations in interest rates, and provides management with the ability to measure business unit, product and customer level profitability based on the financial characteristics of the products rather than the level of interest rates.

o    Provision for Loan and Lease Losses: Business lines are charged for provision based upon their level of net charge-offs as well as the size and composition of their lending portfolio.

o    Costs Allocation: Provident applies a detailed approach to allocating costs at the business unit, product and customer levels. Allocations are generally based on volume/activity and are reviewed and updated regularly.

o    Corporate Center: Corporate Center includes balance sheet and income statement items not allocated to the primary business lines, and gain/loss on the sale of investment securities.

Business line descriptions and fluctuation analysis follows:

o    Commercial Banking provides a broad range of commercial banking and commercial real estate products, services and solutions. Areas of focus and expertise include regional middle-market lending, equipment leasing and financing, treasury management, and loan servicing, transaction structuring and various capital solutions for the multi-family housing industry. Primary operating groups within Commercial Banking are Regional Middle-Market Commercial Banking, Commercial Real Estate, Middle Market Equipment Leasing and Financing and Corporate Services.

  Net income for Commercial Banking for the third quarters of 2003 and 2002 was $14.9 million and $14.1 million, respectively, and for the first nine months of 2003 and 2002 was $47.7 million and $45.9 million, respectively. Contributing to the higher nine-month net income for 2003 was an increase in noninterest income and lower provision expense, which was partially offset by lower interest income and higher operating expenses.

  The growth in noninterest income came primarily from its fee-based commercial real estate businesses, Red Capital Group and Capstone Realty Advisors. Both Red Capital Group and Capstone recognized a significant increase in revenue while utilizing lower levels of capital. The favorable rate environment during the past nine months provided for an increased demand for their services.

  Average asset balances for the first nine months of 2003 increased $347 million or 5% compared to the same time period in 2002. However, net interest income for the first nine months of 2003 failed to keep pace with asset growth due to modest spread compression. Furthermore, provision expense decreased in the first nine months of 2003 primarily due to an overall improvement in credit quality of the commercial loan portfolio.

  In cash management, technology-driven solutions and competitive product offerings contributed to an increase in deposits for the third quarter of 2003. Average commercial deposits for the third quarter of 2003 increased by $389 million, or 61% as compared to the third quarter of 2002. The product offerings have attracted new relationships and generated more business from the existing commercial customer base.

(24)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

  Management continues to reposition this business line in order to develop and grow more predictable earnings. Management has de-emphasized its higher credit risk areas of structured finance lending and large leverage lease transactions while growing its lower credit risk areas of middle market leasing and regional middle market commercial lending units.

o    Retail Banking provides a variety of deposit, credit and investment products, services and solutions to consumers and small businesses through various delivery channels including: branches, call center, ATMs and the internet. Consumer lending primarily focuses on offering home equity loans to high credit-quality borrowers. Primary operating groups within Retail Banking include Branch Banking, Business Banking and Consumer Lending/Prime Home Equity. Retail Banking also includes Provident Financial Advisors, which provides an extensive range of investment, insurance and financial products, services and solutions to individuals, businesses and government agencies.

  Net income increased $1.9 million and $4.2 million for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2003 as compared to the same periods in 2002. The increase in net income for 2003 was primarily the result of growth within Retail’s lending business units.

  Retail Banking continues to alter the composition of its consumer lending portfolio. Management believes that growing its home equity portfolio while slowing auto lease originations will result in an overall lower credit risk exposure.

  Retail Banking has experienced growth in transaction deposits of 24% in the third quarter of 2003 as compared to the third quarter of 2002. Total retail deposit growth had only slight growth over the same time period, however, due to less aggressive pricing on certificates of deposit. Provident plans to further enhance its distribution system to improve customer acquisition and market penetration.

o    Mortgage Banking offers conforming and nonconforming residential mortgage loans to consumers, and also provides fee-based loan processing, loan warehousing and servicing for third-party originators. Loans are originated through retail and broker channels and are sold on a whole-loan basis. Whole-loan sales refer to the transfer of credit risk along with the payment stream of the loan. Primary operating groups within Mortgage Banking include Residential Mortgage Origination and Sales, Third-Party Loan Servicing and Warehouse Lending Services.

(25)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

  Net income for the third quarter of 2003 was $1.3 million as compared to $3.6 million for the third quarter of 2002. For the first nine months of 2003, net income was $7.3 million compared to $6.2 million for the same period in 2002. The decrease in net income for the third quarter of 2003, as compared to 2002, was a result of lower gains recognized on the sale of loans and an impairment charge on mortgage servicing assets. Gains on the sale of nonconforming residential loans decreased from $4.9 million in the third quarter of 2002 to $2.3 million in the third quarter of 2003. An impairment charge of $3.7 million was recorded in the third quarter of 2003, whereas no impairment charges were recognized during 2002.

  Net income for the first nine months of 2003 rose primarily from higher warehouse lending production and growth in the sub-servicing portfolio. Warehouse lending production has benefited from a favorable rate environment, which continues to generate loan refinancing. Sub-servicing has also experienced significant growth as loans serviced for others (excluding securitized mortgages) increased from $4.4 billion at September of 2002 to $9.5 billion at the end of this quarter.

o    Corporate Center includes revenues and expenses not allocated to the primary business lines, including any item not related to their operating activity. The net loss of $9.1 million for the first nine months of 2003 resulted from an after-tax loss of $26.9 million from the sale of subprime residential loans, net of after-tax gains of $12.7 million from the sale of the Merchant Services business and $5.1 million from security sales. Net income of $0.3 million for the first nine months of 2002 was from after-tax gains of $5.4 million from the sale of warrants and $0.8 million from security sales, net of an after-tax loss of $5.9 million from the sale of subprime loans.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, increased $6.9 million, or 3%, compared to the first nine months of 2002. The increase in net interest income was due to an increase in average earning assets of $1.6 billion, or 12%. The increase in average earning assets resulted primarily from the growth of home equity loans and investment securities. The growth in earning assets was primarily funded by a corresponding growth in demand and time deposits.

Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of total interest earning assets. For the first nine months of 2003, the net interest margin, on a tax-equivalent basis, was 2.23% compared to 2.43% for the same period in 2002. This decrease was driven by changes in rates and volumes of earning assets and the corresponding funding sources. The following table details the components of the change in net interest income (on a tax-equivalent basis) by major category of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2003 and 2002.

(26)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Three Months Ended
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2003
September 30, 2002
September 30, 2003
September 30, 2002
(Dollars in Millions)
Average
Balance

Average
Rate

Average
Balance

Average
Rate

Average
Balance

Average
Rate

Average
Balance

Average
Rate

Assets:                                    
Loans and Leases:  
Corporate Lending:  
Commercial   $ 4,461    5.71 % $ 4,227    6.36 % $ 4,475    5.70 % $ 4,281    6.41 %
Mortgage    980    5.32    930    6.08    941    5.58    897    6.34  
Construction    512    4.45    533    4.56    524    4.32    553    4.59  
Lease Financing    1,247    8.14    1,233    9.06    1,239    8.57    1,182    9.36  








Total Corporate Lending    7,200    5.99    6,923    6.67    7,179    6.08    6,913    6.76  
Consumer Lending:  
Installment    1,519    4.36    1,080    6.16    1,427    4.73    994    6.50  
Residential    12    13.46    685    9.64    348    11.00    781    9.50  
Lease Financing    234    7.02    0    0.00    122    7.60    0    0.00  








Total Consumer Lending    1,765    4.77    1,765    7.51    1,897    6.07    1,775    7.82  








Total Loans and Leases    8,965    5.75    8,688    6.84    9,076    6.08    8,688    6.98  
Investment Securities    4,702    3.63    3,789    5.49    4,490    4.26    3,792    5.73  
Federal Funds Sold and Reverse  
Repurchase Agreements    446    1.55    102    2.66    401    1.83    113    2.77  
Other Short Term Investments    549    5.85    407    5.28    517    5.64    331    5.91  








Total Earning Assets    14,662    4.95    12,986    6.36    14,484    5.38    12,924    6.55  
Cash and Due From Banks    306        245        309        232      
Leased Equipment    1,918        2,429        2,088        2,513      
Other Assets    791        703        814        674      




Total Assets   $ 17,677       $ 16,363       $ 17,695       $ 16,343      




Liabilities and  
Shareholders' Equity:  
Deposits:  
Demand Deposits   $ 1,266    1.33   $ 778    1.61   $ 1,175    1.42   $ 613    1.30  
Savings Deposits    1,553    1.71    1,417    2.03    1,478    1.76    1,475    2.02  
Time Deposits    6,700    2.56    6,211    3.49    6,730    2.72    6,193    3.71  








Total Deposits    9,519    2.26    8,406    3.07    9,383    2.40    8,281    3.23  
Short-Term Debt:  
Federal Funds Purchased and  
Repurchase Agreements    1,168    2.32    849    2.90    1,261    2.25    1,076    2.71  
Commercial Paper    250    1.14    268    1.97    271    1.29    275    1.94  








Total Short-Term Debt    1,418    2.11    1,117    2.68    1,532    2.08    1,351    2.55  
Long-Term Debt    3,573    4.72    4,019    5.13    3,659    4.92    4,005    5.15  
Junior Subordinated Debentures    451    3.95    451    5.28    451    4.09    451    5.36  








Total Interest Bearing  
Liabilities    14,961    2.88    13,993    3.70    15,025    3.04    14,088    3.78  
Noninterest Bearing Deposits    1,388        934        1,264        888      
Minority Interest    161        162        161        66      
Other Liabilities    316        425        368        459      
Shareholders' Equity    851        849        877        842      




Total Liabilities and  
Shareholders' Equity   $ 17,677       $ 16,363       $ 17,695       $ 16,343      




Net Interest Spread        2.07 %      2.66 %      2.34 %      2.77 %




Net Interest Margin        2.01 %      2.37 %      2.23 %      2.43 %




  

Provision and Reserve for Loan and Lease Losses and Credit Quality

Provident continues to benefit from the enhanced Credit and Risk Management processes developed over the past two years. This coupled with clear business and portfolio strategies allow for focused business development and aggressive management of both non-strategic portfolios and problem loans.

Provident expanded and improved its analytical and reporting capacity, which in turn improved the timeliness and value of portfolio information. Loans and leases are primarily monitored by closely following changes and trends in risk characteristics. The characteristics are analyzed using various techniques; including, credit scoring models for consumer and small business loans and leases and risk ratings for larger commercial, commercial mortgage and commercial construction loans. These risk ratings are assigned based upon individual credit analysis and are aggregated for reporting to senior management on a regular basis. These same analytics serve as the basis for refining the rating system, and establishing portfolio wide targets and caution levels. Early trends and thresholds trigger changes in strategy and tactics including the use of secondary market alternatives to liquidate and mitigate problem exposures and portfolio segments.

(27)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Provident maintains a reserve for loan and lease losses to absorb losses from current outstandings and potential usage of unfunded commitments. Discussion and analysis of the reserves as well as the overall credit quality of the off-balance sheet lending portfolio is provided in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Asset Securitization Activity” and “Fannie Mae DUS Program.” The following paragraphs provide information concerning its on-balance sheet credit portfolio and unused commitments.

The reserve for loan and lease losses is maintained at a level which management considers adequate to absorb loan and lease losses given the conditions at the time. The reserve is increased by the provision for loan and lease losses. Loans and leases deemed uncollectible are charged off and deducted from the reserve while recoveries on loans and leases previously charged off are added back to the reserve.

The adequacy of the reserve for loan and lease losses is monitored on a regular basis and reflects management’s evaluation of numerous factors. These factors include the quality of the current loan portfolio, the trend in the loan portfolio’s risk ratings, current economic conditions, specific industry trends, loan concentrations, evaluation of specific loss estimates for all significant problem loans, payment histories, collateral valuations, historic charge-off and recovery experience, estimates of charge-offs for the upcoming year and other pertinent information.

Provident lowered its loan loss reserve to total loans by 24 basis points to 2.04% during the past twelve months. The provision for loan and lease losses was $80.9 million and $81.3 million for the first nine months of 2003 and 2002, respectively. The provision for the first nine months of 2003 was negatively impacted by the sale of subprime residential mortgage loans during the second quarter of 2003. Approximately $33.2 million of provision was recognized during the period as a result of the loan sale. Nonperforming assets have decreased by $61.6 million since the third quarter of 2002, with approximately $53 million of the decrease attributable to the subprime residential mortgage loan sale. The sale of the subprime residential mortgage loans and the decrease in nonperforming assets has lowered the level of problem loans. The ratio of reserve for loan and lease losses to total loans was 2.04% and 2.28% at September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

In addition to other loan and finance lease types, the reserve methodology incorporates loss potential from credit events related to the commercial airline portfolio. Risks in the commercial airline portfolio arise from principal reliance on borrower credit quality and secondarily on equipment value. Based upon previous peak outstandings, the majority of commercial airline loans and leases are to borrowers considered to have better credit quality. Even within this segment, shorter maturities have left Provident exposed to residual equipment values. Most of the charge-offs and valuation adjustments have dealt with transactions related to borrowers with weaker credit quality, which exposed Provident to depressed equipment values. Future events could occur that may negatively impact our assessment of borrowers’ credit quality and/or equipment values leading to higher reserves and potential future losses.

(28)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table shows the progression of the reserve for loan and lease losses and selected reserve ratios:

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

(Dollars in Thousands)
2003
2002
2003
2002
Balance at Beginning of Period     $ 185,019   $ 214,860   $ 201,051   $ 241,143  
Provision for Loan and Lease Losses    11,919    23,532    80,909    81,312  
Loans and Leases Charged Off    (17,161 )  (39,951 )  (112,212 )  (136,337 )
Recoveries    4,383    6,368    14,412    18,691  




Balance at End of Period   $ 184,160   $ 204,809   $ 184,160   $ 204,809  




Reserve for Loan and Lease Losses  
as a Percent of:  
Nonaccrual Loans            148.87 %  114.46 %
Nonperforming Assets            139.56 %  105.84 %
Total Loans and Leases            2.04 %  2.28 %

Based upon the analysis of the adequacy of the reserve and the continuing change in composition of the loan and lease portfolio, the reserve for loan and lease losses has been allowed to decline over the past twelve months. However, as a result of the decrease in nonperforming assets, both the reserve to nonaccrual loans and nonperforming assets ratios have improved during this period.

(29)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table presents the distribution of net loan charge-offs by loan type for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2003 and 2002:

Three Months Ended
September 30, 2003

Three Months Ended
September 30, 2002

(Dollars in Thousands)
Net
Charge-
Offs

Pctg of
Average
Total
Loans
(annualized)

Pctg of
Total
Net
Charge-
Offs

Net
Charge-
Offs

Pctg of
Average
Total
Loans
(annualized)

Pctg of
Total
Net
Charge-
Offs

Corporate Lending:                            
Commercial   $ 7,726    0.69 %  60.5 % $ 24,859    2.35 %  74.0 %
Mortgage    -    -    -    22    0.01    0.1  
Construction    (56 )  (0.04 )  (0.4 )  379    0.28    1.1  
Lease Financing    3,946    1.27    30.9    2,620    0.85    7.8  




Net Corporate Lending    11,616    0.65    91.0    27,880    1.61    83.0  
Consumer Lending:  
Installment    1,118    0.29    8.7    850    0.31    2.5  
Residential    2    0.07    -    4,853    2.83    14.5  
Lease Financing    42    0.07    0.3    -    -    -  




Net Consumer Lending    1,162    0.26    9.0    5,703    1.29    17.0  




Net Charge-Offs   $ 12,778    0.57    100.0   $ 33,583    1.55    100.0  





Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2003

Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2002

(Dollars in Thousands)
Net
Charge-
Offs

Pctg of
Average
Total
Loans
(annualized)

Pctg of
Total
Net
Charge-
Offs

Net
Charge-
Offs

Pctg of
Average
Total
Loans
(annualized)

Pctg of
Total
Net
Charge-
Offs

Corporate Lending:                            
Commercial   $ 26,966    0.80 %  27.6 % $ 63,853    1.99 %  54.3 %
Mortgage    100    0.01    0.1    46    0.01    -  
Construction    (232 )  (0.06 )  (0.2 )  679    0.16    0.6  
Lease Financing    8,954    0.96    9.2    28,579    3.22    24.3  




Net Corporate Lending    35,788    0.66    36.7    93,157    1.80    79.2  
Consumer Lending:  
Installment    3,161    0.30    3.2    2,359    0.32    2.0  
Residential    58,800    22.53    60.1    22,130    3.78    18.8  
Lease Financing    51    -    -    -    -    -  




Net Consumer Lending    62,012    4.36    63.3    24,489    1.84    20.8  




Net Charge-Offs   $ 97,800    1.44    100.0   $ 117,64 6  1.81    100.0  




  

The decrease in net charge-offs for commercial loans in the third quarter comparison was due primarily to a $12 million charge-off to a single customer that occurred in the third quarter of 2002. The decrease in residential charge-offs in the third quarter comparison was impacted by the sale of subprime residential mortgage loans that occurred in the second quarter of 2003.

The decrease in net charge-offs for commercial loans in the nine-month comparison was due primarily to the commercial loan charge-off that occurred in the third quarter of 2002 combined with $10.6 million of commercial airline loan charge-offs that occurred during the second quarter of 2002. The decrease in net charge-offs for corporate lease financing in the nine-month comparison is due primarily to $18.6 million of commercial airline lease charge-offs that occurred in the second quarter of 2002. The increase in net charge-offs for residential was due primarily to a $49.2 million charge-off taken in conjunction with the sale of $471 million of subprime residential mortgage loans that occurred during the second quarter of 2003. During the second quarter of 2002, a charge-off of $9.1 million was taken with the sale of $27 million of nonperforming residential loans. If the $49.2 million charge-off related to the residential mortgage loan sale was excluded, the net charge-off to average loans ratio for the nine months of 2003 would have been 0.71%.

(30)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Nonperforming assets at September 30, 2003 were $132.0 million compared to $182.2 million and $193.5 million as of December 31, 2002 and September 30, 2002, respectively. The decrease in nonaccrual corporate lending during the third quarter of 2003 resulted from a combination of charge-offs, payments and payoffs. The decrease in nonaccrual corporate lending during the second quarter of 2003 was due primarily to one large charge off. The decrease in nonaccrual residential mortgage loans and other nonperforming assets during the second quarter of 2003 was due primarily to the sale of subprime residential mortgage loans, which included loans that were on nonaccrual status and foreclosed residential properties. The composition of nonperforming assets over the past five quarters is provided in the following table.

2003
2002
(Dollars in Thousands)
Third
Quarter

Second
Quarter

First
Quarter

Fourth
Quarter

Third
Quarter

Nonaccrual Loans:                        
Corporate Lending:  
Commercial   $ 109,022   $ 116,926   $ 123,912   $ 99,805   $ 117,571  
Mortgage    5,330    6,307    7,298    11,783    10,619  
Construction    3,617    3,792    1,321    1,746    2,243  
Lease Financing    2,271    2,267    2,792    4,008    3,952  





Total Corporate Lending    120,240    129,292    135,323    117,342    134,385  
Consumer Lending:  
Installment    -    -    -    -    -  
Residential    3,468    4,011    45,927    49,091    44,548  
Lease Financing    -    -    -    -    -  





Total Consumer Lending    3,468    4,011    45,927    49,091    44,548  





Total Nonaccrual Loans    123,708    133,303    181,250    166,433    178,933  
Other Nonperforming Assets    8,251    13,858    22,172    15,780    14,579  





Total Nonperforming Assets   $ 131,959   $ 147,161   $ 203,422   $ 182,213   $ 193,512  





Loans 90 Days Past Due  
Still Accruing   $ 10,211   $ 5,971   $ 36,038   $ 29,918   $ 30,482  
Nonaccrual Loans to  
Total Loans and Leases    1.37 %  1.50 %  1.98 %  1.82 %  1.99 %
Nonperforming Assets to:  
Total Loans, Leases and  
Other Nonperforming Assets    1.46 %  1.66 %  2.22 %  1.99 %  2.15 %
Total Assets    0.75 %  0.83 %  1.15 %  1.04 %  1.13 %

(31)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Nonaccrual loans have decreased $42.7 million while other nonperforming assets have decreased $7.5 million during the first nine months of 2003. The following table shows the progression of nonperforming assets during the first nine months of 2003:

Corporate Lending
Consumer Total Other Total
(In Thousands)
Commercial
Real
Estate

Lease
Financing

Residential
Mortgages

Nonaccrual
Loans

Nonperforming
Assets

Nonperforming
Assets

Balance at                                
Beginning of Year   $ 99,805   $ 13,529   $ 4,008   $ 49,091   $ 166,433   $ 15,780   $ 182,213  
Additions    68,830    3,583    2,565    31,103    106,081    8,438    114,519  
Payments / Sales    (29,375 )  (7,772 )  (1,522 )  (51,813 )  (90,482 )  (29,007 )  (119,489 )
Charge-Offs    (30,238 )  (165 )  (1,380 )  (7,762 )  (39,545 )  (2,950 )  (42,495 )
Transfers to Other  
Nonperforming Assets    -    (228 )  (1,400 )  (17,151 )  (18,779 )  18,779    -  
Writedowns    -    -    -    -    -    (2,789 )  (2,789 )
Balance at  







September 30, 2003   $ 109,022   $ 8,947   $ 2,271   $ 3,468   $ 123,708   $ 8,251   $ 131,959  







Noninterest Income

The following table details the components of noninterest income and their change for the third quarter and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2003 and 2002:

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

(Dollars in Thousands)
2003
2002
Change
2003
2002
Change
Service Charges on Deposit Accounts     $ 12,933   $ 11,681    11 % $ 37,656   $ 33,045    14 %
Loan Servicing Fees    6,925    9,018    (23 )  27,013    25,430    6  
Commercial Mortgage Banking Revenue    10,095    5,365    88    31,241    17,132    82  
Other Service Charges and Fees    13,520    10,744    26    38,177    32,664    17  
Leasing Income    127,011    150,135    (15 )  398,110    457,780    (13 )
Cash Gains on Sale of Loans    4,553    5,001    (9 )  16,619    12,135    37  
Warrant Gains    -    -    n/a    1,636    8,186    (80 )
Net Security Gains    5,077    633    702    7,435    1,287    478  
Net Gain on Merchant Services Business    -    -    n/a    19,000    -    n/a  
Other    6,176    5,820    6    17,330    13,546    28  




Total Noninterest Income   $ 186,290   $ 198,397    (6 ) $ 594,217   $ 601,205    (1 )




Explanations for significant changes in noninterest income by category follow:

o    Service charges on deposit accounts increased $1.3 million and $4.6 million in the quarterly and nine-month comparisons due primarily to increases in service charges on corporate accounts and overdraft fees.

o    Loan servicing fees decreased $2.1 million in the quarterly comparison due to a $4.1 million impairment charge for mortgage servicing assets. In the nine-month comparison, fees increased $1.6 million as a result of growth in the residential mortgage servicing portfolios.

o    Increases in fees from both Red Capital Group and Capstone resulted in higher commercial mortgage banking revenue for the three-month and nine-month comparisons.

(32)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

o    Other service charges and fees increased $2.8 million and $5.5 million in the quarterly and nine-month comparisons. The quarterly increase was due primarily to increased fee income generated by Commercial Banking and Trust Services. The nine-month increase also included an increase in warehouse lending fees.

o    Leasing income decreased $23.1 million and $59.7 million in the quarterly and nine-month comparisons due primarily to the decrease in size of the auto lease portfolio classified as operating leases. Auto leases originated since February, 2003 have been classified as finance leases in the loan category rather than operating leases.

o    The decrease in gain on sale of loans of $0.5 million for the third quarter of 2003 is due primarily to lower gains recognized from the sale of nonconforming residential mortgage loans. The nine-month comparison shows an increase of $4.5 million due to higher gains recognized in the first half of 2003. Provident implemented the whole-loan sale strategy during the third quarter of 2001.

o    Provident’s Commercial Banking business line from time to time acquires equity warrants as a part of the lending fee structure established with customers. Warrants gains of $1.6 million were recognized in the first nine months of 2003 compared to gains of $8.2 million in the first nine months of 2002. There were no warrant gains recorded in the third quarter of either year.

o    As part of its strategic repositioning, Provident sold its Merchant Services business in the second quarter of 2003. This sale resulted in a gain of $19 million.

o    An increase in fees associated with investment portfolio management and other trading related activities was the primary reason for the increase in other income for both the three-month and nine-month comparisons.

Noninterest Expense

The following table details the components of noninterest expense and their change for the third quarter and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2003 and 2002:

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

(Dollars in Thousands)
2003
2002
Change
2003
2002
Change
Salaries, Wages and Benefits     $ 60,737   $ 57,141    6 % $ 188,544   $ 172,260    9 %
Charges and Fees    7,404    7,029    5    23,093    22,779    1  
Occupancy    6,224    5,861    6    18,916    17,829    6  
Leasing Expense    86,077    102,690    (16 )  272,587    314,092    (13 )
Equipment Expense    6,398    5,680    13    20,171    17,862    13  
Professional Services    7,906    6,007    32    24,722    18,311    35  
Minority Interest Expense    3,197    3,223    (1 )  9,591    3,889    147  
Disposition Cost of Subprime Loans    -    -    n/a    6,914    -    n/a  
Other    30,167    28,448    6    91,728    82,306    11  




Total Noninterest Expense   $ 208,110   $ 216,079    (4 ) $ 656,266   $ 649,328    1  




(33)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Explanations for significant changes in noninterest expense by category follow:

o    Salaries, wages and benefits increased $3.6 million and $16.3 million in the quarterly and nine-month comparisons due primarily to increased commissions for commercial mortgage banking activities and staffing increases in loan servicing, risk management and retail.

o    The decrease in leasing expense is a result of the decrease in size of the auto lease portfolio classified as operating leases.

o   Equipment expense increased due primarily to increases in depreciation and equipment rental expense.

o    Professional services increased $1.9 million and $6.4 million in the quarterly and nine-month comparisons primarily as a result of increases in professional fees associated with the restatements of operating results and an increase in legal fees for the Commercial Banking area.

o    Minority interest expense relates to dividends payable on $165 million of Preferred Stock of PFGI Capital Corporation, a real estate investment trust that was formed late in the second quarter of 2002. The dividends are payable at an annualized rate of 7.75%.

o    Provident sold subprime residential mortgage loans and foreclosed properties during the second quarter of 2003. Disposition costs of $6.9 million were recorded from the loss on sale of other real estate and other contingencies associated with the sale.

o    The three largest expenses within other noninterest expense for the three-month and nine-month periods were marketing expense ($3.2 million and $9.3 million in 2003 and $2.6 million and $8.9 million in 2002), expenses incurred in the disposal of autos coming off lease ($7.0 million and $16.9 million in 2003 and $2.4 million and $7.5 million in 2002) and travel and entertainment expenses ($2.8 million and $7.9 million in 2003 and $2.0 million and $6.2 million in 2002).

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Short-Term Investments and Investment Securities

Federal funds sold and reverse repurchase agreements increased $153 million since December 31, 2002 primarily as a result of proceeds received from the sale of the subprime residential mortgages and the Merchant Services business late in the second quarter. These additional funds may be used in the sale of the Florida deposits, loans and branches scheduled for the fourth quarter of 2003.

(34)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Trading account securities were $143 million and $128 million as of September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively. Provident trades investment securities with the intention of recognizing short-term profits. These securities are carried at fair value with realized and unrealized gains and losses reported in noninterest income.

Provident had $495 million of loans classified as held for sale at September 30, 2003. This is an increase of $58 million from the amount reported at December 31, 2002. These loans consist of $334 million of multifamily loans, $154 million of nonconforming residential mortgage loans and $7 million of conforming residential mortgage loans. Activities related to the multifamily loans held for sale are predominately a part of the operations of Red Capital Group. The multifamily loans are either insured by the Federal Housing Association or subject to purchase contracts from Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. These loans are usually outstanding for sixty days or less. The remainder of the activities related to the multifamily loans held for sale are part of the operations of Capstone Realty Advisors. Nonconforming residential mortgage loans are being sold on a whole-loan basis. This is part of an initiative started during 2001 to reduce the risk profile of the Mortgage Banking business line.

Securities purchased with the intention of being held for indefinite periods of time are classified as investment securities available for sale. These securities increased $516 million during the first nine months of 2003. U.S. government agency mortgage-backed securities accounted for the majority of the increase, as funds obtained from loan payments and the sale of other debt securities were deployed into investment securities with higher credit quality and increased liquidity.

Loans and Leases

As of September 30, 2003 total loans and leases were $9.0 billion compared to $9.1 billion at December 31, 2002. Provident had an additional $1.5 billion and $2.1 billion of off-balance sheet securitized loans and leases as of September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively. As a result of earnings volatility, management has re-evaluated the risk/reward relationships in the lending portfolio. During the second half of 2001, Provident implemented a whole-loan sale strategy for nonconforming residential loans. During the second quarter of 2003, Provident sold nearly all of the subprime residential mortgage loan portfolio. Also, management has decided to de-emphasize structured finance lending and large-ticket equipment leasing while placing a greater focus on regional middle-market commercial lending and middle-market equipment leasing. As a result of these actions, Provident’s lending portfolio has a much lower concentration of subprime residential loans, a higher concentration of middle-market corporate leases, and a lower risk profile of commercial loans. Provident does not have a material exposure to foreign loans.

(35)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table shows the composition of the commercial loan category by industry type at September 30, 2003:

(Dollars in Millions)
Amount
%
Amount on
Nonaccrual

Mortgage Warehousing Lines     $ 550.0    13   $ 4.2  
Real Estate Operators/Developers/General Contractors    530.0    12    0.3  
Banking and Finance    196.5    5    12.2  
Transportation    190.5    4    5.5  
Healthcare    184.2    4    1.1  
Retailing    183.8    4    5.0  
Tourism and Entertainment    170.6    4    0.4  
Metals    161.0    4    6.3  
Business Services    159.9    4    10.8  
Machinery and Equipment    130.7    3    9.5  
Automobile Dealers    115.7    3    -  
Commercial Aviation Related (1)    107.5    3    24.5  
Construction    107.0    2    3.3  
Eating and Drinking Establishments    104.8    2    0.3  
Financial Services    100.4    2    2.0  
Automotive Services/Parts    86.9    2    3.7  
Chemicals    68.8    2    -  
Technology    66.8    2    5.7  
Other (includes 19 industry types)    1,073.4    25    14.2  



Total   $ 4,288.5    100   $ 109.0  



(1)     Includes $21 million of loans related to the commercial airline industry, and aircraft used in private, charter and corporate markets.

Mortgage warehousing lines decreased $90 million during the first nine months to $550 million, consistent with reduced new loan activity within the industry. All loans are underwritten to Provident and secondary market standards as part of Provident’s control processes related to this activity.

At September 30, 2003, Provident had loans and leases of $166 million to commercial airline carriers, including $21 million of commercial loans and $145 million of finance and operating leases. As the events of September 11, 2001 have had a significant financial impact upon the airline industry and the re-sale value of aircraft, Provident recorded credit costs and other expenses of $34 million during 2002, which were related to secured commercial airline loans and leases. Credit charges and other expenses of $1.4 million were incurred during the first nine months of 2003.

At September 30, 2003, Provident had approximately $744 million of commercial loans to borrowers who have shared national credit loans as compared to $802 million at December 31, 2002. Generally, shared national credit loans are loans that have a commitment amount of at least $20 million and involve three or more supervised financial institutions. In an on-going effort to diversify its portfolio, the shared national credit loans in which Provident participates are distributed across thirty-one industry types, with the largest industry concentration (real estate) accounting for approximately 17% of its total shared national credit loans. The real estate category is comprised of loans to borrowers with different risk characteristics, including single family home developers, commercial property owner/operators and commercial realtors and property managers. The average outstanding balance of a shared national credit loan was $4.2 million.

(36)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The composition of the mortgage and construction loan categories by property type at September 30, 2003 follows:

(Dollars in Millions)
Amount
%
Amount on
Nonaccrual

Office/Warehouse     $ 281.2    19   $ 2.7  
Residential Development    257.6    17    4.5  
Shopping/Retail    206.3    14    -  
Apartments    202.3    13    1.2  
Health Facilities    109.3    7    -  
Land    86.1    6    -  
Hotels/Motels    83.3    6    0.1  
Industrial Plants    28.1    2    -  
Other Commercial Properties    242.5    16    0.4  



Total   $ 1,496.7    100   $ 8.9  



As of September 30, 2003, Provident had $1.3 billion in commercial lease financing. These leases were comprised of $1.1 billion of mid-ticket equipment leases and $0.2 billion of large-ticket equipment leases.

Residential mortgage loans decreased $573 million during the first nine months of 2003, due primarily to the sale of subprime residential mortgage loans that occurred in the second quarter of 2003. Prior to the loan sale, residential mortgage loans had been declining due to Provident implementing a whole-loan sale strategy for its nonconforming residential loans during the second half of 2001. The loan sale, which also lowered the level of nonperforming assets, gives Provident a lower concentration of residential loans and allows it to concentrate more of its resources on its strategic initiatives such as home equity, regional lending and mid-ticket leasing portfolios.

The following table shows the composition of the installment loan category by loan type at September 30, 2003:

(Dollars in Millions)
Amount
%
Home Equity     $ 1,380.3    88  
Indirect Installment    122.6    8  
Direct Installment    53.4    3  
Other Consumer Loans    17.5    1  


Total   $ 1,573.8    100  


(37)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Noninterest Earning Assets

Leased equipment consists of $1.5 billion of auto leases and $0.3 billion of equipment leases. Total leased equipment decreased $525 million, or 22%, during the first nine months of 2003 due primarily to a reduction in the size of the automobile leasing portfolio classified as operating leases. This decrease is due to the amortization of the portfolio. Also, auto leases originated since February 2003 are classified as direct financing leases in the loan category as Provident changed the structure of the residual insurance it obtains on its auto leases.

Other assets increased $20 million, or 3%, during the first nine months of 2003. The increase was primarily due to increases in mortgage servicing rights and unsettled security trades. These trades settled early in the fourth quarter.

Deposits

Total deposits increased $923 million during the first nine months of 2003. Since September 30, 2002, average core deposits have grown 10% with significant contribution coming from commercial deposits. The following table presents a summary of deposit types:

September 30,
(In Millions)
2003
2002
Noninterest Bearing Deposits     $ 1,412.2   $ 988.5  
Interest Bearing Demand Deposits    1,277.1    914.0  
Savings Deposits    1,586.5    1,443.6  
Certificates of Deposit    6,496.3    5,927.1  


Total Deposits   $ 10,772.1   $ 9,273.2  


Borrowed Funds

Short-term debt decreased $522 million during the first nine months of 2003. Decreases in federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements were the primary reason for the decrease in short-term debt.

Long-term debt decreased $366 million, or 10%, during the first nine months of 2003 due primarily to payments on subordinated notes and secured financings.

Minority Interest

During June 2002, Provident and its consolidated subsidiary, PFGI Capital Corporation (PFGI Capital), issued 6.6 million of equity units (PRIDES) to outside investors for $165 million. The Bank owns all of the $165 million of Common Stock of PFGI Capital. The principal business objective of PFGI Capital is to hold and manage commercial mortgage loan assets and other authorized investments acquired from the Bank that will generate net income for distribution to its stockholders. PFGI Capital has elected to be treated as a real estate investment trust (REIT) for federal income tax purposes.

(38)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Each PRIDES has a stated amount of $25 per unit and is comprised of two components – a 3-year forward purchase commitment (Purchase Contract) and PFGI Capital Preferred Stock.

Each Purchase Contract obligates the holder to buy, on August 17, 2005, for $25, a number of newly issued shares of Provident Common Stock equal to the “settlement rate.” The settlement rate will be calculated as follows:

o   if the market value of Provident Common Stock is equal to or greater than $29.0598, the settlement rate will be .8603;
o   if the market value of Provident Common Stock is between $29.0598 and $24.42, the settlement rate will be equal to the $25 stated amount divided by the applicable market value; and
o   if the applicable market value is less than or equal to $24.42, the settlement rate will be 1.0238.

Under the Purchase Contract, Provident will also make quarterly contract adjustment payments to the PRIDES holders at the rate of 1.25% of the stated amount per year. The present value of this obligation has been recorded as a liability and as a reduction to shareholders’ equity.

The PFGI Capital Preferred Stock has a liquidation preference of $25 and an initial non-cumulative dividend rate of 7.75%.

Other Noninterest Earning Liabilities

Other liabilities increased $20 million, or 5%, during the first nine months of 2003 due primarily to an increase in amounts related to unsettled security trades. These trades settled early in the fourth quarter.

Transactions with Affiliates

Provident has had certain transactions with various executive officers, directors and principal holders of equity securities of Provident and its subsidiaries and entities in which these individuals are principal owners. A summary of significant transactions and the indebtedness of these related parties may be found in Note 24 to Provident’s 2002 Annual Report as filed on Form 10-K.

ASSET SECURITIZATION ACTIVITY

From 1996 through the second quarter of 2000, the structure of some of Provident’s securitizations resulted in the transactions being accounted for as sales through the use of special purpose entities. As such, gains or losses were recognized, loans and leases were removed from the balance sheet and residual assets, representing the present value of future cash flows, were recorded. During the third quarter of 2000, management decided to structure all future securitizations as secured financings thereby eliminating the use of gain-on-sale accounting and leaving all debt on the balance sheet.

(39)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The securitization and sale of loans and leases, during the period from 1996 through the first half of 2000, continues to impact the current presentation of Provident’s financial condition, results of operations and off-balance sheet market risks. The areas most significantly affected are loans and leases, retained interest in securitized assets, credit enhancements and credit risk.

Securitized Loans and Leases

Securitized loans and leases that have been treated as sales have been removed from the balance sheet. The following table provides a summary of the outstanding balances of these off-balance sheet managed assets:

September 30,
(In Thousands)
2003
2002
Nonconforming Residential     $ 1,317,721   $ 1,973,471  
Prime Home Equity    144,140    219,958  
Equipment Leases    52,246    113,821  


    $ 1,514,107   $ 2,307,250  


Retained Interest in Securitized Assets and Credit Enhancements

In connection with the recognition of non-cash gains on securitizations accounted for as sales, the present value of future cash flows, referred to as retained interest in securitized assets (RISA), was recorded as an asset within the investment securities line item of the consolidated balance sheets.

Additionally, Provident initially provided for credit enhancements to its securitizations structured as sales in the form of cash in a demand deposit account. The credit enhancements are maintained at a significantly higher balance than the level of estimated credit losses to improve the credit grade of the securitization and thereby reduce the rate paid to investors of the Securitization Trust (Trust).

During the fourth quarter of 2001, Provident reached an agreement with the securitization insurer to release the demand deposit cash credit enhancement for the nonconforming residential loan securitizations and substitute an unfunded demand note backed by a AAA rated standby letter of credit.

In the third quarter of 2003, after further review of the documents underlying the unfunded demand note credit enhancement transaction, it was determined that this unfunded demand note was an asset of the Trust as well as a liability of Provident. As such Provident recorded the fair value of the unfunded demand note as a liability. As Provident owns the residual assets of the Trust, a Due From Trust asset was recorded for the fair value of the demand note that the Trust holds. The fair values of the asset and liability recorded at September 30, 2003 were each approximately $119 million.

As the RISA is classified as an available for sale investment security, it has been adjusted to its fair value with the change in fair value recorded in other comprehensive income. The carrying value of the RISA was increased at September 30, 2003 by $15.0 million, with an after-tax increase to other comprehensive income of $9.8 million.

(40)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The components of the RISA as of September 30, 2003 follow:

(In Thousands)
Nonconforming
Residential

Prime
Home Equity

Estimated Cash Flows of Underlying Loans,            
Net of Payments to Certificate Holders   $ 459,075   $ 11,529  
Less:  
Estimated Credit Loss    (83,396 )  (600 )
Servicing and Insurance Expense    (18,193 )  (2,138 )
Discount to Present Value    (138,321 )  (1,868 )


Carrying Value of Retained Interest in  
Securitized Assets   $ 219,165   $ 6,923  


The carrying value of the nonconforming residential RISA includes the Due From Trust asset of $118.8 million, the amortized cost of the interest-only residual asset of $85.4 million, and the market value adjustment under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115 for the interest-only residual asset of $15.0 million. The prime home equity RISA includes only the carrying value of the interest-only residual asset.

Provident’s credit enhancements for its prime home equity and equipment leasing securitizations have not been impacted by the revised accounting treatment as these cash collateral accounts have not been re-structured. As such, the cash credit enhancements continue to be accounted for separate from the RISA and loss reserves continue to be carried as a liability account. Detail of these credit enhancements along with their loss reserves are provided below as of September 30, 2003:

(In Thousands)
Carrying Value
of Credit
Enhancements

Loss
Reserves

Prime Home Equity     $ 26,183   $ 443  
Equipment Leases    30,793    444  


    $ 56,976   $ 887  


At September 30, 2003, management believes the current carrying values of the RISA, credit enhancements and loss reserves are properly stated.

(41)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Securitization Credit Risk

The following table presents a summary of various indicators of the credit quality of off-balance sheet securitized loans and leases as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2003:

(Dollars in Thousands)
Nonconforming
Residential

Prime Home
Equity

Equipment
Leases

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003:                
Average Securitized Assets   $ 1,546,305   $ 169,947   $ 72,721  
Net Charge-Offs    71,419    906    3,135  
Net Charge-Offs to Average  
Securitized Assets (Annualized)    6.16 %  0.71 %  5.75 %
As of September 30, 2003:  
Securitized Assets   $ 1,317,721   $ 144,140   $ 52,246  
Delinquency Rates:  
30 to 89 Days    11.03 %  0.22 %  1.31 %
90 or More    26.59 %  1.13 %  0.10 %

FANNIE MAE DUS PROGRAM

Red Mortgage, a member of Red Capital Group, is an approved Fannie Mae Delegated Underwriting and Servicing (DUS) mortgage lender. Under the Fannie Mae DUS program, Red Mortgage underwrites, funds and sells mortgage loans on multifamily rental projects. Red Mortgage then services these mortgage loans on Fannie Mae’s behalf. Participation in the Fannie Mae DUS program requires Red Mortgage to share the risk of loan losses with Fannie Mae. The substance of this loss sharing arrangement is that Red Mortgage and Fannie Mae split losses with one-third of all losses assumed by Red Mortgage and two-thirds of all losses assumed by Fannie Mae.

Red Mortgage services multifamily mortgage loans under the DUS program with outstanding principal balances aggregating $3.6 billion at September 30, 2003. Red Mortgage has established reserves of $10.5 million for possible losses under this program. The reserve is determined by evaluating pools of homogeneous loans and includes information based upon industry and historical loss experience, as well as each underlying collateral’s recent operating performance. Management believes the reserve is maintained at a level that adequately provides for the inherent losses within Red Mortgage’s portfolio of DUS loans. At September 30, 2003, two DUS loans totaling $18.5 million in unpaid principal balance in Red Mortgage’s loan servicing portfolio were in payment default. The employees and management team of Red Mortgage have originated and serviced the existing Fannie Mae DUS loan servicing portfolio since 1995 without any charge-offs relating to the DUS loans.

DERIVATIVE AND OFF-BALANCE SHEET FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

In the normal course of business, Provident uses derivative and off-balance sheet financial instruments to manage its interest rate risk and to meet the financing needs of its customers. At September 30, 2003, these financial instruments consisted of letters of credit of $274 million, commitments to extend credit of $4.4 billion, interest rate swaps of $6.6 billion and sold interest rate caps of $2.6 billion.

(42)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

During the course of their regular examination, banking regulators requested that the Company confirm with the SEC staff its accounting treatment for certain hedging activities related to its retained interests in securitized mortgage assets. These hedging activities and the related accounting treatment have been recently reviewed by the national office of our independent auditors who have concluded the accounting treatment is appropriate. The Company expects to conclude this matter in the fourth quarter.

In order to mitigate credit risk within the auto lease portfolio, Provident entered into credit risk transfer arrangements during 2001 and 2000. Under the 2001 transaction, Provident transferred 97 1/2% of the credit risk on an auto lease portfolio, while retaining a 2 1/2% first-loss position. Under the 2000 transaction, Provident transferred 98% of the credit risk on an auto lease portfolio, while retaining a 2% first-loss position. As a result of these transactions, Provident was able to lower its credit concentration in auto leasing while reducing its regulatory capital requirements. As of September 30, 2003, the remaining unpaid auto lease balances on the 2001 and 2000 transactions were $0.4 billion and $0.6 billion, respectively.

CAPITAL RESOURCES AND ADEQUACY

Total shareholders’ equity at September 30, 2003 was $892 million compared to $880 million at December 31, 2002. The change in the equity balance relates primarily to net income exceeding dividends by $30.1 million, an increase in the market value of cash flow hedging instruments of $32.9 million (net of deferred taxes) and a decrease in the market value of investment securities of $54.7 million (net of deferred taxes).

Capital expenditures planned by Provident in 2003 for premises and equipment are currently estimated to be approximately $30 million. Included in this amount are projected capital expenditures for the purchase of data processing hardware and software, branch renovations and enhancements, facility renovations and ATMs. Through September 30, 2003, approximately $20 million of these expenditures had been made.

The following table of ratios is important for an analysis of capital adequacy:

Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2003

Year Ended
December 31, 2002

Average Shareholders' Equity to Average Assets      4.96 %  5.12 %
Average Tangible Shareholders' Equity to  
Average Tangible Assets    4.44    4.55  
Period End Shareholders' Equity to  
Period End Assets    5.07    5.02  
Period End Tangible Shareholders' Equity to  
Period End Tangible Assets    4.56    4.49  
Dividend Payout to Net Earnings    54.79    50.64  
Tier 1 Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets    9.99    9.40  
Total Risk-Based Capital To Risk-Weighted Assets    11.87    11.42  
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio    7.82    7.81  

Risk-based capital guidelines established by the Federal Reserve Board set minimum capital requirements and require institutions to calculate risk-based capital ratios by assigning risk weightings to assets and off-balance sheet items. Provident is required to maintain minimum ratios of 4.00% for Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets, 8.00% for total risk-based capital to risk-weighted assets, and 4.00% for Tier 1 capital to average assets. These guidelines further define “well-capitalized” levels for Tier 1, total risk-based capital, and leverage ratio purposes at 6.00%, 10.00% and 5.00%, respectively. As of September 30, 2003, both Provident and the Bank were categorized as well-capitalized for regulatory purposes.

(43)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

LIQUIDITY

Adequate liquidity is necessary to meet the borrowing needs and deposit withdrawal requirements of customers as well as to satisfy liabilities, fund operations, support asset growth and pay dividends to shareholders. Management forecasts that the largest liquidity needs for the next twelve months will come from growth in the lending portfolio, maturing of retail and brokered certificates of deposit, and scheduled principal payments on long-term debt. Provident has a variety of sources to meet these liquidity demands. First, management expects to issue new certificates of deposit along with renewing many of its maturing certificates of deposit. Management also projects growth within retail deposits and a decrease in the size of the investment securities portfolio. Additional sources of liquidity include the availability to borrow both short-term and long-term funds.

Funding for the sale of the Florida deposits, loans and branches, which is scheduled to close on November 21, 2003, is expected to come from proceeds from the second quarter sale of subprime residential mortgage loans, repayments on and sales of investment securities, and from general corporate funding.

Consistent with Provident’s contingent funding plan, management monitors the potential impact of changes in its corporate ratings on existing and new business transactions. Ratings related liquidity events may include reduced availability of short-term federal funds, reduced availability to the surety bond market that supports the bank’s Public Funds program and other commitments provided to third parties in related business transactions. If such ratings events are anticipated, management will take actions to enhance balance sheet liquidity positions to meet liquidity needs. Such actions to enhance liquidity positions were taken in connection with Provident’s March 5, 2003 announcement related to the restatement of its earnings. In anticipation of potential ratings downgrades, management took actions to enhance liquidity positions, including issuance of additional brokered certificates of deposits. Additional term liquidity reduces reliance on short-term funding and increases the availability of collateral in the investment portfolio. Management will continue to monitor events as the need may arise for further liquidity enhancements in the future.

The major source of liquidity for Provident on a parent-only basis is dividends paid to it by its subsidiaries. Pursuant to Federal Reserve and state banking regulations, the maximum amount available for dividend distribution to the Parent at September 30, 2003 by its banking subsidiary was approximately $64.9 million. The Parent has received $50 million in dividends from its banking subsidiary during the current year. During 2001, higher credit costs had an unfavorable impact on net income. While credit costs have declined substantially in 2002 and 2003, if these costs were to rise again, this could impact Provident’s ability to maintain the payment of its quarterly dividend at current rates.

(44)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Note 1 to Provident’s 2002 annual report on Form 10-K discusses significant accounting policies used in the development and presentation of Provident’s financial statements. However, four of these accounting policies are considered to be critical due to the level of sensitivity and subjectivity of their underlying accounting estimates. These critical accounting policies concern the adequacy of the reserve for loan and lease losses; the valuation of retained interest in securitized assets and securitized credit enhancements; the valuation of mortgage servicing assets; and the valuation of derivatives.

Reserve for Loan and Lease Losses: Provident maintains a reserve to absorb potential loan and lease losses inherent in its lending portfolio. Management’s determination of the adequacy of the loan loss reserve is based on an assessment of the potential losses given the conditions at the time. This assessment consists of certain loans and leases being evaluated on an individual basis, as well as all loans and leases being categorized based on common credit risk attributes and being evaluated as a group. Management evaluates numerous factors including the credit quality of the current loan portfolio, the trend in the loan portfolio’s risk ratings, current economic conditions, specific industry trends, loan concentrations, evaluation of specific loss estimates for all significant problem loans, payment histories, collateral valuations, historical charge-off and recovery experience, estimates of charge-offs for the upcoming year and other relevant information.

Loans and leases that have been placed on classified and/or nonaccrual status are further evaluated for potential losses based upon review and discussion among Credit, Portfolio Risk Review, lending officers, collection associates, and senior management. Factors considered include the market value of collateral or real estate associated with a specific loan or lease, cash flows generated by the borrower, third-party guarantees, the general economic climate and any specific industry trends that may affect an individual loan or lease.

Additional loss estimates associated with securitized assets and loans sold under the Fannie Mae DUS Program are provided for separately from the reserve for loan and lease losses. For more information on credit exposures on these off-balance sheet assets, see “Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Asset Securitization Activity” and “Fannie Mae DUS Program.”

RISA and Securitized Credit Enhancements: Prior to July 2000, Provident structured many of its securitization transactions as sales. As such, Provident retained (a) future cash flows of the underlying loans, net of payments due to investors of the securitization trust, servicing fees and other fees (RISA), (b) servicing rights on the loans and leases, and (c) credit enhancement accounts used to absorb credit losses on the loans securitized. Gain or loss on the sale of the loans depended in part on the previous carrying amount of the financial assets involved in the transfer, allocated between the assets sold and the assets retained based on their relative fair value at the date of transfer. However, quotes are generally not available for assets retained, so Provident estimates the fair value based on key assumptions, including prepayment speeds, credit losses, forward yield curves, and discount rates commensurate with the risks involved.

(45)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Provident monitors the valuation of the RISA on a monthly basis. The valuation centers primarily around two estimates: total life-time credit losses and the constant prepayment rate (CPR). During 2002 and 2003, both of these factors trended upward which had an unfavorable impact on the nonconforming residential RISA valuation. Additionally, the CPR was impacted by management’s decision to accelerate the liquidation of other real estate associated with the securitized nonconforming residential portfolio. Provident models a CPR range from 30% to 36% with the actual trailing three-month average CPR currently running at 33.9%. If the CPR stays at its current level, management estimates that there would be sufficient cash flows to absorb lifetime losses up to 7.0%. If the CPR rises to 36%, there would be sufficient cash flows to absorb lifetime losses up to 6.8%. Cumulative incurred losses through September 30, 2003 are 4.9%, with estimated total lifetime losses expected to be 6.4%. On a worst case basis, management currently estimates that lifetime losses should not exceed 6.9% assuming real estate values remain relatively stable. At September 30, 2003, management believes the current carrying value of the RISA is properly stated.

Valuation of Mortgage Servicing Assets: Provident recognizes the rights to service mortgage loans it does not own but services for others within Other Assets of its balance sheet. Mortgage servicing assets are carried at the lower of the initial carrying value, adjusted for amortization, or estimated fair value. Estimated fair value is based on projected discounted cash flows which takes into consideration estimated servicing fees, prepayment speeds, discount rates, earnings on deposit of escrow funds and other assumptions. The mortgage loan prepayment rate is the most significant factor driving the value of mortgage net servicing assets. Increases in mortgage loan prepayments reduce estimated future net servicing cash flows because the life of the underlying loan is reduced. Mortgage servicing assets are tested quarterly to verify the market value equals or exceeds its carrying value. During the third quarter of 2003, Provident recorded a $4.1 million impairment charge to its mortgage servicing assets. Impairment charges result in an increase to the mortgage servicing valuation allowance.

Other-than-temporary impairment is recognized when the recoverability of a recorded valuation allowance is determined to be remote taking into consideration historical and projected interest rates and loan payoff activity. When this situation occurs, the unrecoverable portion of the valuation allowance is applied as a direct write-down to the carrying value of mortgage servicing assets. Unlike a valuation allowance, a direct write-down permanently reduces the carrying value of mortgage servicing assets and the valuation allowance, precluding subsequent recoveries.

(46)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Valuation of Derivatives: In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” Provident carries the fair value of derivative instruments on its consolidated balance sheets with changes in value recorded in the income statement or as other comprehensive income. Although the value of the derivatives are determined using third-party valuations, these valuations use discounted cash flow modeling techniques, which require the use of assumptions concerning the amount and timing of future cash flows. These estimates have a significant impact on the valuation of the derivatives.

(47)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The responsibility of monitoring and managing market and liquidity risk is assigned to the Asset Liability Committee (ALCO). The main component of market risk is the risk of loss in the value of financial instruments that may result from the changes in interest rates. ALCO is bound to guidelines stated in the relevant policies approved by the Board of Directors.

In addition to the natural balance sheet hedges, ALCO utilizes derivative instruments to manage interest rate risk on and off its balance sheet. Interest rate swaps and caps are the most widely used tools to manage interest rate risk.

Provident uses an earnings simulation model to analyze net interest income sensitivity to movements in interest rates. The model evaluates the effect of changes in interest rates on net interest income by running various interest rate scenarios up and down from a flat rate scenario. As a basis for strategic interest rate risk management, the ALCO group periodically analyzes the impact of additional interest rate scenarios on net interest income in addition to the standard scenarios used for policy measurement. These rate scenarios are established by ALCO and incorporate changes to the slope of the yield curve. The balance sheet assumptions, including loan growth, funding mix, and prepayment speeds primarily on mortgage related products, are adjusted for each rate scenario. Market-based prepayment speeds are incorporated into the analysis, particularly for mortgage related products, including investment portfolio securities. Faster prepayments during low interest rate environments such as the current levels negatively impact interest rate margins due to lower reinvestment yields.

Provident’s policy limit stipulates that the negative impact on net interest income from a +/-200 basis points, 12 month gradual parallel ramp rate scenario as compared to the flat rate scenario cannot exceed 10 percent over the next 12 month period. These tests are performed on a monthly basis, and the results are presented to the Board of Directors. Based on the results of the simulation model, net interest income would change by the following over the next 12-month period: decrease 3.70% for a 100 basis point decrease; increase 0.05 % for a 100 basis point increase; and decrease 0.22 % for a 200 basis point increase. Due to the current interest rate environment, nothing beyond a 100 basis point decrease was simulated.

Although primarily classified as leased equipment, Provident continues to include all of its auto leases in its interest sensitivity analysis.

ALCO regularly incorporates discussions and analyses of market risk embedded in off-balance sheet activities as well as on non-interest income items such as loan sale premiums. ALCO actively monitors the impact of related market risk since these premiums are sensitive to changes in interest rates.

(48)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

All transaction accounts are regularly analyzed for embedded market risk. These accounts are evaluated with respect to their repricing characteristics as well as their expected average lives. ALCO actively monitors the behavioral characteristics of these products. Managed account rates adjust slower and at smaller increments than short-term rates due to the competitive environment. During the current low rate environment, such price rigidities negatively impact interest rate margins in the short run; however, the long-term profitability and liquidity characteristics of these accounts are very attractive.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the principal executive and financial officers, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of Provident’s disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2003. Based on that evaluation, management, including the principal executive and financial officers, concluded that Provident’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective with no significant weaknesses noted. There has been no change in Provident’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during Provident’s quarter ended September 30, 2003 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Provident’s internal control over financial reporting.

(49)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Provident and its subsidiaries are not parties to any pending legal proceedings other than routine litigation incidental to their business except for the following matters related to the restatements announced March 5, 2003, and April 15, 2003. The restatement of previously reported operating results announced on March 5, 2003, was attributed to unintentional errors in the accounting for nine auto lease financing transactions originated between 1997 and 1999.

Provident’s audit committee, through legal counsel, engaged the auditing firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for the purpose of conducting a review of the Company’s March 5, 2003 restatement. Provident’s management affirmed, based upon the review of its advisors, its prior conclusion that the accounting errors that led to the restatement were unintentional.

Several purported class-actions have been filed against Provident, its President, Robert L. Hoverson, its Chief Financial Officer, Christopher J. Carey, and their predecessors in those positions, on behalf of all purchasers of Provident securities from March 30, 1998 through March 5, 2003. Litigation has also been filed against Provident, its President, Robert L. Hoverson and its Chief Financial Officer, Christopher J. Carey plus PFGI Capital Corporation, a Provident subsidiary, and others on behalf of all purchasers of PRIDES in or traceable to a June 6, 2002 offering of those securities registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission and extending to March 5, 2003. That action alleges violations of securities laws by the defendants in Provident’s financial disclosures during the period from March 30, 1998 through March 5, 2003 and in the June 2002 offering. These actions are based upon circumstances involved in the restatement of earnings announced by Provident on March 5, 2003 and allege violations of federal securities laws by the defendants in Provident’s financial disclosures during the period from March 30, 1998 through March 5, 2003. They seek an unspecified amount of damages and, in two cases, reimbursement of all executive bonuses received during that period.

These actions have been consolidated before Judge S. Arthur Spiegel of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio under the caption, Merzin v. Provident Financial Group, Inc., consolidated Civil Action Master File No. C-1-03-165. The Amended Consolidated Complaint was filed on August 22, 2003. Provident and the other Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint on November 5, 2003.

Several derivative actions have also been filed in federal and state courts on behalf of Provident versus Provident’s directors and others. These suits were also concerned with the restatements of earnings and allege that the defendants breached fiduciary duties owed to Provident and are responsible for the conditions that led to the restatements and failed to ensure that the accounting errors were prevented or detected. These actions seek recovery from the defendants of an unspecified amount of damages and reimbursement of all executive bonuses and stock options.

(50)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

The derivative actions filed in federal court are pending before Chief Judge Walter Herbert Rice of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio under the captions, Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 572 Pension Fund v. Jack Cook, et al., Case No. C-1-03-168, and Peter Berg v. Jack M. Cook, et al., Case No. C-1-03-196. Motions to dismiss the federal court derivative actions were filed on behalf of all of the defendants on September 2, 2003. All proceedings in the derivative actions filed in state court have been indefinitely stayed by agreement of the parties and their respective legal counsel.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

        (a)        Exhibits filed:

  Exhibit 31.1 - Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Certification of Principal Executive Officer

  Exhibit 31.2 - Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Certification of Principal Financial Officer

  Exhibit 32.1 - Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Certification of Principal Executive Officer

  Exhibit 32.2 - Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Certification of Principal Financial Officer

        (b)     Reports on Form 8-K:

  Form 8-K (Items 7 and 9) Announcement of sale of subprime residential mortgage loans, merchant servicing business, and Florida deposits, loans and branches; filed on July 10, 2003.  

  Form 8-K (Items 7 and 9) Earnings release for second quarter; filed on July 16, 2003.

  Form 8-K (Items 7 and 9) Slide show for second quarter investor conference call; filed on July 17, 2003.

  Form 8-K (Items 7 and 12) Earnings release for third quarter; filed on October 15, 2003

  Form 8-K (Items 7 and 12) Slide show for third quarter investor conference call; filed on October 16, 2003

All other items required in Part II of this form have been omitted since they are not applicable or not required.

(51)


PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Provident Financial Group, Inc.
Registrant

Date: November 13, 2003

/s/Christopher J. Carey
Christopher J. Carey
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

(52)