UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
|
(Mark One) |
|
OR |
|
{ } TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
Commission file number 1-4033 |
|
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) |
|
New Jersey (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
63-0366371 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
|
|
|
|
Title of each class |
Name of each exchange on which registered |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None |
Annual Report On Form 10-K Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2001 CONTENTS |
|||
|
|||
Part |
Item |
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- |
Signatures |
20 |
PART I |
Item 1. Business
- |
a limestone quarry, aggregates processing plant, deepwater harbor and other properties, located on the east coast of Mexico's Yucatan Peninsula; |
Additionally, in 2001, the Company acquired two aggregates facilities in Tennessee and two recycling facilities in Illinois.
As of year-end 2001, the Company, either directly or indirectly or through joint ventures, operated 202 permanent reserve-supplied aggregates production facilities in 18 states and Mexico for the production of crushed stone (limestone and granite), sand and gravel, and rock asphalt with estimated reserves totaling approximately 10.3 billion tons.
In addition to the aggregates production facilities, as of year-end 2001, the Company operated a total of 60 truck, rail and marine distribution yards in 18 states.
As of year-end 2001, the Company, either directly or indirectly or through joint ventures, operated 31 recrushed concrete plants, 2 slag plants, and various other types of plants which produce fine grind, dolomitic lime and other aggregates.
Other Construction Materials products and services include asphalt mix and related products, ready-mixed concrete, trucking services, barge transportation, paving construction, and several other businesses. As of year-end 2001, the Company operated 50 asphalt plants in 6 states and 27 ready-mixed concrete plants in 5 states.
Environmental and zoning regulations have made it increasingly difficult for the construction aggregates industry either to expand existing quarries or to develop new quarries in some markets. Although it cannot be predicted what policies will be adopted in the future by governmental bodies regarding environmental controls which affect the construction materials industry, the Company believes that future environmental control costs will not have a materially adverse effect upon its business. Furthermore, any future land use restrictions could make zoning and permitting more difficult. Any such restrictions, while curtailing expansion or acquisitions in certain areas, could potentially enhance the value of the Company's existing mineral reserves.
Management believes that the Construction Materials segment's raw material reserves are sufficient for predicted production levels for the foreseeable future. The Company does not anticipate any material difficulties in either the number of sources or the availability of raw materials in the future.
The Construction Materials segment strives to maintain a sufficient level of inventory of its aggregates to meet delivery requirements of its customers. The Construction Materials segment generally provides for standard payment terms similar to those customary for the construction aggregates industry. The terms generally provide for payment within 30 days of being invoiced.
Chemicals
The Chemicals segment is organized into two business units: the Chloralkali business unit which manages the Company's line of chloralkali products and related businesses, and the Performance Chemicals business unit, operating under the Vulcan Performance Chemicals name, which manages the Company's specialty chemicals and services business.
The Chloralkali business unit produces and sells chlorine, caustic soda, hydrochloric acid, potassium chemicals and chlorinated organic chemicals principally to the chemical processing, polymer, refrigerant, foam-blowing, food and pharmaceutical, pulp and paper, textile and water management industries. Vulcan Performance Chemicals offers specialty and custom chemical products, services, technologies and manufacturing capabilities for a variety of customer needs in a number of industries, including pulp and paper and water management.
In the paper industry, caustic soda is used primarily in the kraft and sulfite pulping processes. Chlorine is used in potable water disinfection and sewage management, to remove impurities from recycled aluminum and as an ingredient to make other chlorinated products. Caustic soda and caustic potash are used in the production of soaps and detergents. Caustic soda also is used to demineralize water for steam production at electrical energy facilities and to remove sulfur from gas and coal. The Company supplies hydrochloric acid to the energy industry for stimulation of oil and gas wells. Hydrochloric acid, caustic soda, caustic potash and methylene chloride are used by the food and pharmaceutical industries. Perchloroethylene and methylene chloride are used in industrial cleaning applications. Ethylene dichloride (EDC) is used in the manufacture of PVC, and pentachlorophenol is used in utility pole treatment. The Chloralkali business unit's sales to t
he chemical processing industry serve companies that produce organic and inorganic chemical intermediates and finished products. Products sold to this market segment include hydrochloric acid, chlorine, caustic soda, caustic potash, potassium carbonate and various chlorinated hydrocarbons. Potassium carbonate is used in the manufacture of screen glass, rubber antioxidants, cleansers and other chemicals. The Company sells chloroform, methyl chloroform, perchloroethylene and other chlorinated hydrocarbons to the fluorocarbons market as feedstocks for manufacturing refrigerants.
In 1998, the Company first announced the formation of a joint venture with Mitsui & Co., Ltd., to construct a new chloralkali plant and expand EDC production capacity at the Company's current manufacturing site in Geismar, Louisiana. This joint venture was structured to take advantage of the Company's manufacturing and marketing capabilities and Mitsui's access to global EDC markets. Mitsui, the world's leading EDC trader, is purchasing all of the EDC output at Geismar. Both the new chloralkali plant and the expanded EDC plant began production in 2000.
In February 1999, the Company combined its specialty chemicals businesses into Vulcan Performance Chemicals. This business unit includes Callaway Chemical Company, Callaway's Mayo Division, Callaway Chemical De Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V., Vulcan Chemical Technologies, Inc. and Vulcan's sodium chlorite business. Vulcan Performance Chemicals offers a blend of products, services, technologies and manufacturing capabilities for customers in a variety of industries, with emphasis on pulp and paper and water management. On March 1, 2002, Vulcan Performance Chemicals announced its alliance with Apollo Chemical pursuant to which Apollo will perform the sales and service functions of Vulcan Performance Chemicals' textile product line. Vulcan Performance Chemicals will continue to manufacture all of its textile products.
Underground reserves of salt, a basic raw material used by the Chloralkali business unit in the production of chlorine and caustic soda, are located near the Company's Wichita, Kansas and Geismar, Louisiana plants. The Company purchases salt for its Port Edwards, Wisconsin plant. Ethylene, methanol and vinyl chloride monomer, the other major raw materials used in the Chloralkali business unit, and various chemicals used as raw materials by Vulcan Performance Chemicals are purchased from several different suppliers. Sources of salt, ethylene, methanol, vinyl chloride monomer and various other raw material chemicals are believed to be adequate for the Company's operations, and the Company does not anticipate any material difficulty in obtaining the raw materials which it uses.
The Chemicals segment delivers its products upon receipt of orders or requests from customers. On occasion, when necessary to conform to regional industry practices, the Company has sold product under various payment terms.
In the 1990s, the production of carbon tetrachloride and methyl chloroform for emissive uses was phased out to a large extent because of the ozone depleting properties of these chemicals. The Company has now developed new non-ozone-depleting products to replace those products. The Company is about to complete a plant at its Geismar complex that will produce HCC-240fa, a feedstock to make new fluorocarbons that will replace hydrochlorofluorocarbons. Under long-term agreements, the Company will supply HCC-240fa to Honeywell Fluorine Products Group for its plant which will also be located in Geismar. The resulting foam-blowing agent offers environmental benefits over present ozone-depleting compounds and it exhibits comparable or superior insulation performance. Both the Company's and Honeywell's plants are scheduled to be operational by mid-2002.
Financial Results by Business Segments
Net sales, total revenues, segment earnings, identifiable assets and related financial data for each of the Company's business segments for the three years ended December 31, 2001, are reported on pages 48 and 49 (Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements) in the Company's 2001 Annual Report to Shareholders, which referenced pages of said report are incorporated herein by reference.
Item 2. Properties
Construction Materials
The Company's current estimate of approximately 10.3 billion tons of zoned and permitted aggregates reserves is approximately 0.3 billion tons more than the estimate reported at the end of 2000. Management believes that the quantities of zoned and permitted reserves at the Company's aggregates facilities are sufficient to result in an average life of approximately 44 years at present operating levels. See Note 1 to the table of the Company's 10 largest active aggregates facilities on page 6 for a description of the method used by the Company for estimating the years of life of reserves.
The foregoing estimates of reserves are of recoverable stone, sand and gravel of suitable quality for economic extraction, based on drilling and studies by the Company's geologists and engineers, recognizing reasonable economic and operating restraints as to maximum depth of overburden and stone excavation.
Of the 202 permanent reserve-supplied aggregates production facilities which the Company operates directly, or through joint ventures, 67 are located on owned land, 33 are on land owned in part and leased in part, and 102 are on leased land. While some of the Company's leases run until reserves at the leased sites are exhausted, generally the Company's leases have definite expiration dates which range from 2002 to 2105. Most of the Company's leases have options to extend them well beyond their current terms.
Due to transportation costs, the marketing areas for most aggregates facilities in the construction aggregates industry are limited, often consisting of a single metropolitan area or one or more counties or portions thereof when transportation is by truck only. The following table itemizes the Company's 10 largest active aggregates facilities determined on the basis of the quantity of aggregates reserves, with nearby major metropolitan areas (if applicable) shown in parentheses:
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Playa Del Carmen, Mexico |
Limestone |
98 |
Owned |
|
McCook (Chicago), Illinois |
Limestone |
66.3 |
Owned |
|
Grayson (Atlanta), Georgia |
Granite |
Over 100 |
Owned |
|
Gray Court (Greenville), South Carolina |
Granite |
Over 100 |
Owned |
|
Reed (Paducah), Kentucky |
Limestone |
25.3 |
Leased |
(3) |
Warrenton, Virginia (Washington, D.C.) |
Diabase |
Over 100 |
Leased |
(3) |
Calera (Birmingham), Alabama |
Limestone |
69.1 |
Owned |
|
Jack (Richmond), Virginia |
Granite |
Over 100 |
66% Owned |
2059 |
Skippers, Virginia |
Granite |
89.5 |
Leased |
2016 |
Mount Misery (Hanover), Pennsylvania |
Limestone |
47.3 |
Owned |
________________________________
(1) |
Estimated years of life of aggregates reserves are based on the average annual rate of production of the facility for the most recent three-year period, except that if reserves are acquired or if production has been reactivated during that period, the estimated years of life are based on the annual rate of production from the date of such acquisition or reactivation. Revisions may be necessitated by such occurrences as changes in zoning laws governing facility properties, changes in aggregates specifications required by major customers and passage of government regulations applicable to aggregates operations. Estimates also are revised when and if additional geological evidence indicates that a revision is necessary. |
(2) |
Renewable by the Company through date shown. |
(3) |
Lease does not expire until reserves are exhausted. Surface rights at the Paducah, Kentucky facility are owned. |
Chemicals
All of the facilities at Wichita are located on a 1,815-acre tract of land owned by the Company. Mineral rights for salt are held by the Company under two leases that are automatically renewable from year to year unless terminated by the Company and under several other leases which may be kept in effect so long as production from the underlying properties is continued. In addition, the Company owns 280 acres of salt reserves and 108 acres of water reserves. The Company maintains an electric power cogeneration facility at the Wichita plant site which is capable of generating approximately one-third of the plant's electricity and two-thirds of its process steam requirements. The Company has placed this cogeneration facility in reserve and is purchasing most of its requirements for electric power from a local utility at favorable rates pursuant to a long-term agreement. Through a separate agreement with this utility, the Company does operate its cogenera
tion unit upon the request of the utility at various times during the summer peak electricity demand period, selling the cogenerated electricity to the utility at profitable rates.
The facilities at Geismar are located on a 2,185-acre tract of land owned by the Company. Mineral rights for salt are held under a lease which may be extended, at the Company's option, through 2037. Included in the facilities at the Geismar plant are the operations associated with the joint venture with Mitsui & Co., Ltd. and an electric power cogeneration facility owned by the Company. The cogeneration facility supplies a majority of the electricity and process steam required by the Geismar plant, but not the joint venture facility. A long-term contract from the regional supplier is in place to supply the additional electrical power requirements of the joint venture plant.
The plant facilities at Port Edwards are located on a 34-acre tract of land, the surface rights to which are owned by the Company. Currently, the Company purchases its salt and electrical power requirements for the Port Edwards facility from regional supply sources.
Manufacturing facilities for chemicals produced by Vulcan Performance Chemicals (other than sodium chlorite which is produced at Wichita and Port Edwards) are operated by subsidiaries of the Company. Vulcan Performance Chemicals indirectly owns two production facilities in Columbus, Georgia and additional production facilities in Smyrna, Georgia, Dalton, Georgia and Shreveport, Louisiana. Vulcan Performance Chemicals also has an office and small production facility on leased property in Vancouver, British Columbia.
The Company's Chemicals manufacturing facilities are designed to permit a high degree of flexibility as to raw material feedstocks, product mix and product ratios; therefore, actual plant production capacities vary according to these factors. Management does not believe, however, that there is material excess production capacity at the Company's Chemicals facilities.
Other Properties
The headquarters staffs for the Construction Materials and Chemicals segments and the Southern and Gulf Coast Division of the Construction Materials segment are located in an office complex in Birmingham, Alabama. The majority of this office space is leased through December 31, 2013 and consists of approximately 189,000 square feet. The annual rental for each year in the initial 5 year period, the second 5 year period and the final 5 year period of the lease will be approximately $3.0 million, $3.2 million and $3.4 million, respectively. Additional space is leased in an adjacent building for a term of five years ending 2005. The square footage of this additional space is 6,995 and the base rent starts at $136,402 and increases to $159,393 by the end of the term.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
In the course of its Construction Materials and Chemicals operations, the Company is subject to occasional governmental proceedings and orders pertaining to occupational safety and health or to protection of the environment, such as proceedings or orders relating to noise abatement, air emissions or water discharges. As part of its continuing program of stewardship in safety, health and environmental matters, the Company has been able to resolve such proceedings and to comply with such orders without any materially adverse effects on its business.
The Company also is a defendant in various lawsuits in the ordinary course of business. It is not possible to determine with precision the probable outcome of, or the amount of liability, if any, under these lawsuits; however, in the opinion of the Company and its counsel, the disposition of these lawsuits will not adversely affect the consolidated financial position of the Company to a material extent. In addition to those lawsuits in which the Company is involved in the ordinary course of business, certain other legal proceedings involving the Company are more specifically described below. It is the Company's opinion that the disposition of these described lawsuits will not adversely affect the consolidated financial position of the Company to a material extent.
As reported in the Company's Report on Form-10K for the year ended December 31, 2000, the Company settled a number of notices of violation of air pollution control requirements issued by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency for a civil forfeiture of approximately $106,000. This settlement covered all but one affected facility. The Company and the State have continued settlement discussions with respect to the alleged violations at the one remaining facility, and the Company expects to settle the alleged violations at this facility for a civil forfeiture payment in excess of $100,000.
Early in 1999 a subsidiary of the Company terminated a distribution agreement for the sale of certain specialty chemicals in four Asian countries between it and Phillip Barker. Following the termination, Barker filed a claim for breach of contract, unfair competition and unfair business practices, which was submitted to arbitration in California. The arbitrator issued a final Determination stating that the Claimant was entitled to damages, attorneys fees and costs in the amount of $23,234,239. The Company and its subsidiary filed suit in federal court in Virginia challenging the arbitral award based on the fact that the agreement provided that it would be construed under the laws of Virginia. Concurrently, the plaintiff filed a motion to confirm the arbitral award in the Superior Court in Sacramento, California, and an order was entered on June 1, 2001, confirming the award. The Company and its subsidiary appealed th
at order on June 11, 2001 to the California Court of Appeals where oral arguments have not been scheduled. On July 19, 2001, the Federal District Court for the Western District of Virginia entered an order granting the motion of the Company and its subsidiary to vacate the arbitration award and remanded the matter for further proceedings. The plaintiff filed a notice of appeal of this order with the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and filed a motion with the district court to stay the order pending the appeal. The district judge stayed the remand feature of his order pending the appeal to the Fourth Circuit. Oral argument was held in the Fourth Circuit on February 27, 2002. These appeals will not be decided until later in 2002.
The Company is involved in fifteen cases as a result of its sale of the chemical product perchloroethylene, which has been sold to the drycleaning and other industries as a cleaning solvent. One of these matters involves environmental contamination that allegedly occurred in connection with operations of drycleaning facilities. This case is an action filed by the City of Modesto in the State Court of California. This case arose from alleged contamination of soils and municipal water wells in the City of Modesto and alleges certain product liability claims against the Company. The case is set for trial in 2003. Other perchloroethylene product liability cases involve claims of IBM employees who allege personal injury as a result of workplace exposure at three IBM semiconductor manufacturing plants. The Company is named as a defendant, along with IBM and other chemical manufacturers and distributors
, in approximately 14 cases involving approximately 200 plaintiffs. One of the plaintiff's claims has been settled without any participation by the Company. Seven other plaintiffs' claims are set for trial in November 2002.
The Company has been named as a defendant in multiple lawsuits filed in state court and federal district court in Louisiana. The lawsuits claim damages for various personal injuries allegedly resulting from releases of chemicals at the Company's Geismar, Louisiana, chloralkali plant. Fifty-three lawsuits, involving approximately 1,000 named plaintiffs have now been filed. Of the cases filed, 19 seek to certify a class.
In September 2001, the Company was named a defendant in a suit brought by the Illinois Department of Transportation ("IDOT"), in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, Illinois, alleging damage to a 0.9 mile section of Joliet Road that bisects the Company's McCook Quarry in McCook, Illinois, a Chicago suburb. IDOT seeks damages to "repair, restore, and maintain" the road, or in the alternative, judgment for the cost to "improve and maintain other roadways to accommodate" vehicles that previously used the road. The complaint also requests that the court enjoin any McCook Quarry operations that may further damage the road. There are a number of possible resolutions of this litigation, including rerouting the traffic or rebuilding the 0.9 mile section of Joliet Road. The traffic has been rerouted around this .9 mile section of Joliet Road for almost four years. In some preliminary discussions, IDOT has claimed damages in excess of $30 million to settle the matter.
Name |
Position |
Age |
Donald M. James |
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
53 |
Guy M. Badgett, III |
Senior Vice President-Construction Materials, East, and |
53 |
William F. Denson, III |
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
58 |
Mark E. Tomkins |
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
46 |
Robert A. Wason IV |
Senior Vice President, Corporate Development |
50 |
Richard K. Carnwath |
Vice President, Planning and Development |
53 |
J. Wayne Houston |
Vice President, Human Resources |
52 |
Ejaz A. Khan |
Vice President, Controller and Chief Information Officer |
45 |
John A. Heilala |
Chairman, Chloralkali Business Unit |
61 |
John L. Holland |
President, Performance Chemicals Business Unit |
59 |
Brad C. Rosenwald |
President, Chloralkali Business Unit |
49 |
Daniel J. Leemon |
Chairman, Midwest and Midsouth Divisions |
63 |
Sherrod B. Clarke, Jr. |
President, Midsouth Division |
49 |
Ronald G. McAbee |
President, Mideast Division |
55 |
Thomas R. Ransdell |
President, Southwest Division |
59 |
Daniel F. Sansone |
President, Southern and Gulf Coast Division |
49 |
James W. Smack |
President, Western Division |
58 |
Robert R. Vogel |
President, Midwest Division |
44 |
Michael R. Mills |
Associate General Counsel |
41 |
Harri J. Haikala |
Assistant General Counsel |
38 |
Norman Jetmundsen, Jr. |
Assistant General Counsel |
48 |
The principal occupations of the executive officers during the past five years are set forth below:
Donald M. James, was elected Chairman of the Board of Directors in May 1997. He became President and Chief Executive Officer in February 1997. Prior to that he served as President and Chief Operating Officer.
Guy M. Badgett, III, was elected Senior Vice President, Construction Materials, East in February 1999. He was elected Chairman, Southern Division in May 1997. He has served as President, Southeast Division, since 1992.
William F. Denson, III, was elected Senior Vice President and General Counsel in May 1999. Prior to that date he served as Senior Vice President-Law. He has also served as Secretary since April 1981.
Mark E. Tomkins was elected Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in January 2001. He was also appointed Treasurer in May 2001. From August 1998 to January 2001 he served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Great Lakes Chemical Company. From January 1997 to August 1998 he served as Vice President, Finance and Business Development Polymers Division, and from August 1996 to January 1997 he served as Vice President, Finance and Business Development, Electronic Materials Division of Allied Signal.
Robert A. Wason IV was elected Senior Vice President, Corporate Development in December 1998. From 1996 until 1998 he served as President, Performance Systems Business Unit.
Richard K. Carnwath has served as Vice President, Planning and Development since 1985.
J. Wayne Houston was elected Vice President, Human Resources in October 1997. Prior to that time he served as Director of Compensation and Benefits.
Ejaz A. Khan was elected Vice President and Controller in February 1999. Prior to that he served as Controller. He was appointed as Chief Information Officer as well in February 2000.
Brad C. Rosenwald became President of the Chloralkali Business Unit in January 2002. Prior to that he served as Vice President, Manufacturing of the Chloralkali Business Unit.
John A. Heilala became Chairman of the Chloralkali Business Unit in January 2002, pending his retirement in April 2002. Prior to that time he served as President, Chloralkali Business Unit.
John L. Holland joined the Company in December 1998 as President of the Performance Chemicals Business Unit. Prior to that he served as President of BetzDearborn Water Management Group and Group Vice President, BetzDearborn, Inc.
Sherrod B. Clarke, Jr. was appointed President of the Midsouth Division in November 2001. Prior to that, he served as Vice President and General Manager of West Region, Midsouth Division.
Daniel J. Leemon became Chairman of the Midsouth Division in November 2001 and was appointed Chairman of the Midwest Division in November 2000. He also served as President, Midsouth Division until November 2001. Mr. Leemon plans to retire from the Company in April 2002.
Ronald G. McAbee was appointed President of Mideast Division in January 1999. Prior to that time he served as Vice President, East Region of the Midsouth Division.
Thomas R. Ransdell has served as President, Southwest Division since 1994. He also served as President, Vulcan Gulf Coast Materials, Inc., from 1987 to May 1997.
Daniel F. Sansone is President of Southern and Gulf Coast Division. Formerly he served as President, Southern Division since July 1999 and President, Vulcan Gulf Coast Materials Division since May 1997. Prior to that time he served as Vice President, Finance.
James W. Smack was appointed President of Western Division effective in January 1999. Prior to that time he served as President, Mideast Division.
Robert R. Vogel was appointed President of the Midwest Division in November 2000. Prior to that he served as Vice President-Georgia for the Southeast Division.
Michael R. Mills was appointed Associate General Counsel in July 2000. Prior to that time he served as Assistant General Counsel, Construction Materials Group.
Harri J. Haikala was appointed Assistant General Counsel effective March 1, 2002. Prior to that time he served as Senior Attorney.
Norman Jetmundsen, Jr. became Assistant General Counsel effective January 14, 2002. Prior to that time he was a partner at the Birmingham, Alabama, law firm of Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP.
PART II |
Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
Quarter Ended |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||
|
High $48.19 55.30 55.22 48.95 |
Low $40.75 43.60 37.50 40.46 |
High $ 47.75 48.88 47.00 48.44 |
Low $ 37.69 41.25 37.50 36.50 |
Dividends paid in 2001 totaled $91,080,000, as compared with $84,765,000 paid in 2000. On February 8, 2002, the Board of Directors authorized a quarterly dividend of $.235 per share of Common Stock payable March 8, 2002, to holders of record on February 22, 2002. This quarterly dividend represents a 4.4% increase over quarterly dividends paid in 2001.
The Company's policy is to pay out a reasonable share of net cash provided by operating activities as dividends, consistent on average with the payout record of past years, and consistent with the goal of maintaining debt ratios within prudent and generally acceptable limits. The future payment of dividends, however, will be within the discretion of the Board of Directors of the Company and depends on the Company's profitability, capital requirements, financial condition, growth, business opportunities and other factors which the Board of Directors may deem relevant.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The selected statement of earnings, per share data and balance sheet data for each of the 5 years ended December 31, 2001, set forth below have been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company. The following data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Company and notes to consolidated financial statements on pages 33 through 36 and 37 through 50 respectively, of the Company's 2001 Annual Report to Shareholders, which are incorporated herein by reference.
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|||||||||
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
1998 |
1997 |
||||||
(Amounts in millions, except per share data) |
||||||||||
Net sales |
$ |
2,755.3 |
$ |
2,491.7 |
$ |
2,355.8 |
$ |
1,776.4 |
$ |
1,678.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Page |
|
Consolidated Financial Statements |
33-36 |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
37-50 |
Management's Responsibility for Financial Reporting and Internal Control |
32 |
Independent Auditors' Report |
32 |
Net Sales, Total Revenues, Net Earnings and Earnings Per Share Quarterly Financial |
|
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
PART III |
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The information under the headings "Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners" and "Stock Ownership of Management" included in the Company's 2002 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
No information is required to be included herein pursuant to Item 404 of Regulation S-K.
PART IV |
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) (1) Financial Statements
Page |
|
Consolidated Statements of Earnings |
33 |
Consolidated Balance Sheets |
34 |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows |
35 |
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity |
36 |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
37-50 |
Management's Responsibility for Financial Reporting and Internal Control |
32 |
Independent Auditors' Report |
32 |
Net Sales, Total Revenues, Net Earnings and Earnings Per Share Quarterly Financial |
58 |
(a) (2) Financial Statement Schedules
The following financial statement schedule for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999 is included in Part IV of this report on the indicated page:
Schedule II |
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves |
18 |
Other schedules are omitted because of the absence of conditions under which they are required or because the required information is provided in the financial statements or notes thereto.
Financial statements (and summarized financial information) of 50% or less owned entities accounted for by the equity method have been omitted because they do not, considered individually or in the aggregate, constitute a significant subsidiary.
(a) (3) Exhibits
The exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K and indicated below, other than Exhibit (12) which is on page 18 of this report, are either incorporated by reference herein or accompany the copies of this report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the New York Stock Exchange. Copies of such exhibits will be furnished to any requesting shareholder of the Company upon payment of the costs of copying and transmitting the same.
Exhibit (3)(a) |
Certificate of Incorporation (Restated 1988) of the Company as amended in 1989 and 1999 filed as Exhibit 3(a) to the Company's 1989 Form 10-K Annual Report and Exhibit 3(i) to the Company's 1999 Form 10-K Annual Report (File No. 1-4033).1 |
Exhibit (3)(b) |
By-laws of the Company, as restated February 2, 1990, and as last amended July 13, 2001, filed as Exhibit 3(ii) to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2001 (File No. 1-4033). 1 |
Exhibit (4)(a) |
Distribution Agreement dated as of May 14, 1991, by and among the Company, Goldman, Sachs & Co., Lehman Brothers and Salomon Brothers Inc., filed as Exhibit 1 to the Form S-3 filed on May 2, 1991 (Registration No. 33-40284).1 |
Exhibit (4)(b) |
Indenture dated as of May 1, 1991, by and between the Company and First Trust of New York (as successor trustee to Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York) filed as Exhibit 4 to the Form S-3 on May 2, 1991 (Registration No. 33-40284).1 |
Exhibit (4)(c) |
Senior Debt Indenture between the Company and The Bank of New York as trustee, dated as of August 31, 2001 filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on September 5, 2001 (Registration No. 333-67586). 1 |
Exhibit (4)(d) |
Subordinated Debt Indenture between the Company and The Bank of New York as trustee, dated August 31, 2001 filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on September 5, 2001 (Registration No. 333-67586). 1 |
Exhibit (10)(a) |
The Management Incentive Plan of the Company, as last amended and restated filed as Exhibit 10(a) to the Company's 1989 Form 10-K Annual Report (File No. 1-4033).1,2 |
Exhibit (10)(b) |
The Unfunded Supplemental Benefit Plan for Salaried Employees filed as Exhibit 10(d) to the Company's 1989 Form 10-K Annual Report (File No. 1-4033).1,2 |
Exhibit (10)(c) |
Amendment to the Unfunded Supplemental Benefit Plan for Salaried Employees.2 |
Exhibit (10)(d) |
The Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors Who Are Not Employees of the Company. 2 |
Exhibit (10)(e) |
The 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan of the Company filed as Exhibit 10(h) to the Company's 1995 Form 10-K Annual Report (File No. 1-4033).1,2 |
Exhibit (10)(f) |
The Deferred Stock Plan for Nonemployee Directors of the Company.2 |
Exhibit (10)(g) |
The Restricted Stock Plan for Nonemployee Directors of the Company.2 |
Exhibit (10)(h) |
Executive Deferred Compensation Plan.2 |
Exhibit (10)(i) |
Change in Control Employment Agreement Form filed as Exhibit (10)(m) to the Company's 1999 Form 10-K Annual Report (File No. 1-4033). 1,2 |
Exhibit (10)(j) |
Change in Control Employment Agreement Form filed as Exhibit (10)(n) to the Company's 1999 Form 10-K Annual Report (File No. 1-4033). 1,2 |
Exhibit (10)(k) |
Executive Incentive Plan of the Company filed as Exhibit (10)(n) to the Company's 2000 Form 10-K Annual Report (File No. 1-4033). 1,2 |
Exhibit (10)(l) |
Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement filed as Exhibit 10 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001 (File No. 1-4033). 1,2 |
Exhibit (12) |
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges for the five years ended December 31, 2001 (set forth on page 19 of this report). |
Exhibit (13) |
The Company's 2001 Annual Report to Shareholders. |
Exhibit (21) |
List of the Company's subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001. |
Exhibit (23) |
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP |
Exhibit (24) |
Powers of Attorney |
Information, financial statements and exhibits required by Form 11-K with respect to the Company's Thrift Plan for Salaried Employees, Construction Materials Divisions Hourly Employees Savings Plan and Chemicals Division Hourly Employees Savings Plan, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, will be filed as one or more amendments to this Form 10-K on or before June 28, 2002, as permitted by Rule 15d-21 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
1Incorporated by reference.
2Management Contract or Compensatory Plan.
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
Vulcan Materials Company:
We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Vulcan Materials Company and its subsidiary companies as of December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999 and for the years then ended, and have issued our report thereon dated February 1, 2002; such consolidated financial statements and report are included in your 2001 Annual Report to Shareholders and are incorporated herein by reference. Our audits also included the consolidated financial statement schedule of Vulcan Materials Company and its subsidiary companies, listed in Item 14. This consolidated financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, such consolidated financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information shown therein.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Birmingham, Alabama
February 1, 2002
Schedule II
VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES
Column A |
Column B |
Column C |
Column D |
Column E |
Column F |
|
|
|
Additions |
Additions |
|
|
|
2001 |
||||||
Accrued Environmental Costs |
$ 13,777 |
$ 1,707 |
|
$ 2,078 |
(1) |
$ 13,406 |
|
||||||
Accrued Environmental Costs |
$ 8,800 |
$ 974 |
$ 5,200 |
$ 1,197 |
(1) |
$ 13,777 |
|
||||||
Accrued Environmental Costs |
$ 3,973 |
$ 145 |
$ 4,844 |
$ 162 |
(1) |
$ 8,800 |
(1) Expenditures on environmental remediation projects.
(2) Write-offs of uncollected accounts and worthless notes, less recoveries.
(3) Valuation and qualifying accounts and reserves for which additions, deductions and balances are
individually insignificant.
(4) Reserves established with acquisitions which increased goodwill.
Exhibit 12
VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
For the Years Ended December 31
Amounts in Thousands
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
1998 |
1997 |
|
Fixed charges: |
494 24,340 $ 88,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
101,373 88,860 (2,746) 754 $ 410,921 |
92,345 76,252 (6,150) 686 $ 383,026 |
111,868 74,087 (4,445) 693 $ 421,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on March 27, 2002.
VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY |
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature |
Title |
Date |
/s/Donald M. James |
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer |
March 27, 2002 |
/s/Mark E. Tomkins |
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial |
March 27, 2002 |
/s/Ejaz A. Khan |
Vice President, Controller |
March 27, 2002 |
The following directors: |
|
|
By /s/William F. Denson, III |
|