SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC CO - 10-Q Quarterly Report

Back to GetFilings.com

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[ X ] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002
-------------------------------------

Commission file number 1-3779
---------------------------------------------

SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
----------------------------------------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

California 95-1184800
- ------------------------------- -------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)

8330 Century Park Court, San Diego, California 92123
- -------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)

(619) 696-2000
----------------------------------------------------------
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes X No
----- -----

Common stock outstanding: Wholly owned by Enova Corporation

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME
Dollars in millions

SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME
Dollars in millions

SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
Dollars in millions

SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
Dollars in millions

SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS
Dollars in millions

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. GENERAL

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is that of San Diego Gas & Electric
Company (SDG&E or the company), the common stock of which indirectly is
wholly owned by Sempra Energy, a California-based Fortune 500 holding
company, which also indirectly owns the common stock of Southern
California Gas Company (SoCalGas). SDG&E and SoCalGas are collectively
referred to herein as "the California utilities." The financial
statements herein are the Consolidated Financial Statements of SDG&E and
its sole subsidiary, SDG&E Funding LLC.

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in
accordance with the interim-period-reporting requirements of Form 10-Q.
Results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative
of results for the entire year. In the opinion of management, the
accompanying statements reflect all adjustments necessary for a fair
presentation. These adjustments are only of a normal recurring nature.
Certain changes in classification have been made to prior presentations
to conform to the current financial statement presentation.

Information in this Quarterly Report is unaudited and should be read in
conjunction with the company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2001 (Annual Report) and Quarterly Report on Form 10-
Q for the three months ended March 31, 2002.

The company's significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 of
the notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the company's
companies' Annual Report. The same accounting policies are followed for
interim reporting purposes.

As described in the notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the
company's Annual Report, SDG&E accounts for the economic effects of
regulation on utility operations (excluding generation operations) in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 71,
"Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation" (SFAS 71).

NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued two
statements, SFAS 142 "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" and SFAS 143
"Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations." The former is not
presently relevant to the company.

SFAS 143 addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations
associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the
associated asset retirement costs. This applies to legal obligations
associated with the retirement of long-lived assets. It requires
entities to record the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement
obligation in the period in which it is incurred. When the liability is
initially recorded, the entity increases the carrying amount of the
related long-lived asset to reflect the future retirement cost. Over
time, the liability is accreted to its present value and paid, and the
capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related
asset. SFAS 143 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal
years beginning after June 15, 2002.

Upon adoption of SFAS 143, the company estimates that it would record an
addition of $540 million to utility plant representing the company's
share of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) estimated
future decommissioning costs, and a corresponding retirement obligation
liability of $540 million. The nuclear decommissioning trusts balance of
$521 million at June 30, 2002 represents amounts collected for future
decommissioning costs and earnings thereon, and has a corresponding
offset in accumulated depreciation ($369 million related to SONGS Units
2 and 3) and deferred credits ($152 million related to SONGS Unit 1).
Any difference between the amount of capitalized cost that would have
been recorded and depreciated and the amounts collected in the nuclear
decommissioning trusts will be recorded as a regulatory asset or
liability. Except for SONGS, the company has not yet determined the
effect of SFAS 143 on its financial statements, but has determined that
it will not have a material impact on its Statements of Consolidated
Income.

In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS 144 "Accounting for the Impairment
or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets" that replaces SFAS 121, "Accounting
for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be
Disposed Of." The adoption of SFAS 144, which governs the determination
of whether the carrying value of certain assets, primarily property,
plant and equipment, should be reduced, has not affected the company's
financial statements.

In June, 2002, a consensus was reached in Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) Issue 02-3, which codifies existing guidance on the recognition
and reporting of gains and losses on energy trading contracts and
addresses other aspects of the accounting for contracts involved in
energy trading and risk management activities. Most of the consensus is
not applicable to SDG&E, because of the way the company conducts
business and the requirements of SFAS 71. However, at a later date, the
EITF will also address the application of fair value accounting in
situations where there is very little market information, including
whether it is appropriate to use fair-value accounting and, if so, how
fair value should be determined.

2. MATERIAL CONTINGENCIES

ELECTRIC INDUSTRY RESTRUCTURING

The restructuring of California's electric utility industry
significantly affected the company's electric utility operations. The
background of this issue is described in the company's Annual Report.
Subsequent developments are described herein.

SDG&E's undercollection balance has been reduced from $392 million at
December 31, 2001, to $314 million at June 30, 2002. SDG&E has filed an
application with the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) for a
rate surcharge. However, even at current rates and allocation of those
rates between the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) and
SDG&E, the balance is expected to be completely recovered by mid 2005.
Also at issue is the ownership of certain power sale profits. As
previously discussed in Note 14 of the notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements in the Annual Report, the CPUC rejected portions of a
memorandum of understanding with respect to a settlement of regulatory
issues related to electricity contracts held by SDG&E. The proposed
settlement would have granted SDG&E ownership of its power sale profits
in exchange for crediting $219 million to customers to offset the rate-
ceiling balancing account. Instead, the CPUC asserted that all the
profits associated with the contracts (which the CPUC estimated to be
$363 million) should accrue to the benefit of customers. The company
believes the CPUC's calculation of these profits is incorrect. Moreover,
the company believes that all profits associated with the contracts
properly are for the benefit of SDG&E shareholders rather than
customers. Accordingly, SDG&E has challenged the CPUC's disallowance of
profits from the contracts in both the California Court of Appeals and
in Federal District Court.

These court proceedings have been held in abeyance pending the CPUC's
consideration of another proposed settlement that has been negotiated
with the CPUC legal division and is the subject of ongoing public
hearings. The settlement, if approved by the CPUC, would dispose of all
issues relating to the contracts by allocating an additional $24 million
of power sale profits to customers by a reduction of the rate-ceiling
balancing account. The settlement, if approved, would not adversely
affect SDG&E's financial position, liquidity or results of operations.
If the settlement is not approved, SDG&E intends to proceed with its
previously instituted litigation seeking the allocation of all power
sale profits to shareholders.

On March 21, 2002, the CPUC affirmed its decision prohibiting new direct
access contracts after September 20, 2001, but rejected a proposal to
make the prohibition retroactive to July 1, 2001. Contracts in place as
of September 20, 2001 may be renewed or assigned to new parties. In a
separate proceeding, the CPUC will examine the use of exit fees as a
means of recovering from direct access customers the adverse effects on
the DWR of direct access customer departures from utility procurement.

On April 4, 2002, the CPUC approved a plan that determines how much
ratepayer revenue the state's investor-owned utilities (IOUs) can
collect in 2002 for utility-retained generation. SDG&E continues to
collect the system average rate of 7.96 cents/kWh (the 6.5-cent
commodity rate ceiling, plus an amount sufficient to repay the DWR for
its purchases of power for utility customers, and a 0.7-cent/kWh
"competition transition charge" rate. The excess, if any, of the system
average rate over actual costs is used to reduce the undercollection
balance described above. Incremental Cost Incentive Pricing (ICIP) is
continued for SONGS through 2003. When ICIP is replaced with traditional
rate-setting mechanisms in 2004, the SONGS ratebase will start at zero,
resulting in no significant earnings until new plant additions at SONGS
accumulate to significant amounts. SDG&E has requested a rehearing of
this decision as it is contrary to the market-based pricing contemplated
in the overall mechanism adopted by the CPUC in 1996. Market-based
treatment would provide positive earnings if the plant's operating costs
were below the revenues produced by sales to the competitive market.

Since early 2001, the DWR has procured power for each of the California
IOUs because of their actual or imminent inability to finance the
procurement themselves. In March of 2002, the CPUC established the
allocation of the power and the related cost responsibility among the
California electric utilities for power sold by DWR. SDG&E's allocation
results in its overall rates being comparable to those of the other two
California electric utilities, Southern California Edison and Pacific
Gas and Electric, although this allocation could change in future years.
SDG&E and the DWR have an agreement under which the DWR will continue to
purchase power for SDG&E's customers through December 31, 2002. The
company has received notice from the DWR of its intent to cancel this
agreement effective January 1, 2003. The CPUC intends for the utilities
to take the procurement function back from DWR by the beginning of 2003,
and is now considering how the power from the long-term contracts signed
by DWR should be allocated to the customers of each of the utilities for
purposes of determining the amount of additional power each utility will
be required to procure in 2003 and thereafter to fill out its resource
needs. The California Legislature has passed Assembly Bill 57 (AB 57),
which, if signed into law by the governor, would require the CPUC to
make this determination, and to establish procedures that will allow
utilities to recover their electric procurement costs in a timely
fashion without the need for retrospective reasonableness reviews. AB 57
is currently awaiting the Governor's signature. SDG&E believes that the
return to the procurement function will have no adverse impact on its
financial position or results of operations if it is accomplished in
conformance with AB 57.

GAS INDUSTRY RESTRUCTURING

As discussed in Note 15 of the notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements in the Annual Report, in December 2001 the CPUC issued a
decision related to gas industry restructuring, with implementation
anticipated during 2002. However, during the quarter ended June 30,
2002, implementation has been delayed and the CPUC may order additional
hearings.

CPUC INVESTIGATION OF ENERGY-UTILITY HOLDING COMPANIES

In January 2002, the CPUC issued a decision that broadly determined that
a holding company would be required to provide cash to a utility
subsidiary to cover its operating expenses and working capital to the
extent they are not adequately funded through retail rates. Also in
January 2002, the CPUC ruled that it had jurisdiction to create the
holding company system and, therefore, retains jurisdiction to enforce
conditions to which the holding companies had agreed. The company
subsequently filed a request for rehearing on the issues. On July 17,
2002, the CPUC denied a rehearing. The company is planning to seek
judicial review of the orders in the California Court of Appeals. The
company must file its appeal no later than August 21, 2002.

NUCLEAR INSURANCE

SDG&E and the other co-owners of SONGS have purchased primary insurance
of $200 million, the maximum amount available, for public-liability
claims. An additional $9.3 billion of coverage is provided by secondary
financial protection required by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and
provides for loss sharing among utilities owning nuclear reactors if a
costly accident occurs. SDG&E and the other co-owners of SONGS could be
assessed retrospective premium adjustments of up to $176 million
(SDG&E's share is $36 million unless default occurs by any other co-
owner) in the event of a nuclear incident involving any of the licensed,
commercial reactors in the United States, if the amount of the loss
exceeds $200 million. In the event the public-liability limit stated
above is insufficient, the Price-Anderson Act provides for Congress to
enact further revenue-raising measures to pay claims, which could
include an additional assessment on all licensed reactor operators.

Insurance coverage is provided for up to $2.75 billion of property
damage and decontamination liability. Coverage is also provided for the
cost of replacement power, which includes indemnity payments for up to
three years and six weeks, after a waiting period of 12 weeks. Coverage
is provided through a mutual insurance company owned by utilities with
nuclear facilities. If losses at any of the nuclear facilities covered
by the risk-sharing arrangements were to exceed the accumulated funds
available from these insurance programs, SDG&E could be assessed
retrospective premium adjustments of up to $7.4 million.

Both the public-liability and property insurance include coverage for
SDG&E's and the other co-owners' losses resulting from acts of
terrorism.

LITIGATION

Lawsuits filed in 2000 and currently consolidated in San Diego Superior
Court seek class-action certification and damages, alleging that Sempra
Energy, SoCalGas and SDG&E, along with El Paso Energy Corp. and several
of its affiliates, sought to maintain their positions in the natural gas
market by agreeing, among other things, to restrict the supply of
natural gas into Southern California.

SER, SET and SDG&E, along with all other sellers in the western power
market, have been named defendants in a complaint filed at the FERC by
the California Attorney General's office seeking refunds for electricity
purchases based on alleged violations of FERC tariffs. The FERC has
dismissed the complaint. The California Attorney General's office has
filed a request for rehearing.

Management believes the above allegations are without merit.

In connection with its investigation into California energy prices, in
May 2002 the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) ordered all
energy companies engaged in electric energy trading activities to state
whether they had engaged in "death star," "load shift," "wheel out,"
"ricochet," "inc-ing load" and various other specific trading activities
as described in memos prepared by attorneys retained by Enron
Corporation and in which it was asserted that Enron was manipulating or
"gaming" the California energy markets. In response to the inquiry,
SDG&E has denied using any of these strategies. It did disclose and
explain a single de minimus 100-MW transaction for the export of
electricity out of California. In response to a related FERC inquiry it
has also denied engaging in "wash" or "round trip" trading activities.
SDG&E is also cooperating with the FERC and other governmental agencies
and officials in their various investigations of the California energy
markets.

Except for the matters referred to above, neither the company nor its
subsidiary is party to, nor is their property the subject of, any
material pending legal proceedings other than routine litigation
incidental to their businesses. Management believes that these matters
will not have a material adverse effect on the company's financial
condition or results of operations.

3. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

The following is a reconciliation of net income to comprehensive income.

Three Months Six Months
Ended Ended
June 30, June 30,
-----------------------------------
(Dollars in millions) 2002 2001 2002 2001
- -------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income $ 52 $ 38 $ 107 $ 92

Minimum pension liability
adjustments (1) -- (1) --

-----------------------------------
Comprehensive income $ 51 $ 38 $ 106 $ 92
- -------------------------------------------------------------------

4. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Note 9 of the notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the
company's Annual Report discusses the company's financial instruments,
including the adoption of SFAS 133 and SFAS 138, accounting for
derivative instruments and hedging activities, market risk, interest-
rate risk management, energy derivatives and contracts, and fair value.
Additional activity and information since January 1, 2002 related to
financial instruments are described herein.

At June 30, 2002, $2 million in other current assets, $65 million in
current liabilities and $630 million in deferred credits and other
liabilities were recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for fixed-
priced contracts and other derivatives. Regulatory assets and
liabilities were established to the extent that derivative gains and
losses are recoverable or payable through future rates. As such, $64
million in current regulatory assets, $630 million in noncurrent
regulatory assets, and $2 million in other current liabilities, were
recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2002. There
was no material impact to the Statements of Consolidated Income for the
six months ended June 30, 2002.

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the
financial statements contained in this Form 10-Q and Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
contained in the company's Annual Report.

INFORMATION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report contains statements that are not historical fact
and constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words "estimates,"
"believes," "expects," "anticipates," "plans," "intends," "may," "would"
and "should" or similar expressions, or discussions of strategy or of
plans are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-
looking statements are not guarantees of performance. They involve
risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Future results may differ
materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon various
assumptions involving judgments with respect to the future and other
risks, including, among others, local, regional, national and
international economic, competitive, political, legislative and
regulatory conditions and developments; actions by the CPUC, the
California Legislature, the DWR, and the FERC; capital market
conditions, inflation rates, interest rates and exchange rates; energy
and trading markets, including the timing and extent of changes in
commodity prices; weather conditions and conservation efforts; war and
terrorist attacks; business, regulatory and legal decisions; the pace of
deregulation of retail natural gas and electricity delivery; the timing
and success of business development efforts; and other uncertainties,
all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond the
control of the company. Readers are cautioned not to rely unduly on any
forward-looking statements and are urged to review and consider
carefully the risks, uncertainties and other factors which affect the
company's business described in this report and other reports filed by
the company from time to time with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

See also "Factors Influencing Future Performance" below.

CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY

The company's California utility operations have historically been a
major source of liquidity. However, beginning in the third quarter of
2000 and continuing into the first quarter of 2001, SDG&E's liquidity
and its ability to make funds available to Sempra Energy were adversely
affected by the electric cost undercollections resulting from a
temporary ceiling on electric rates legislatively imposed in response to
high electric costs. Growth in these undercollections has ceased as a
result of an agreement with the DWR, under which the DWR is obligated to
purchase SDG&E's full net short position consisting of the power and
ancillary services required by SDG&E's customers that are not provided
by SDG&E's nuclear generating facilities or its previously existing
purchase power contracts. The agreement extends through December 31,
2002. The company has received notice from the DWR of its intent to
cancel this agreement effective January 1, 2003. The CPUC is conducting
proceedings intended to establish guidelines and procedures for the
eventual resumption of electricity procurement by SDG&E and the other
California IOUs. Electric costs are now below the rates under the rate
ceiling. In addition, AB 57, if signed into law by the governor, would
provide for rates that would reflect the costs of power. See further
discussion in the company's Annual Report and the discussion of AB 57
above.

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES

For the six-month period ended June 30, 2002, the increase in cash flows
from operations compared to the corresponding period in 2001 was
primarily due to SDG&E's undercollection of purchased-power costs, the
balance of which decreased to $392 million at December 31, 2001 and $314
million at June 30, 2002 from a high in mid-2001 of $750 million. In
addition, the increase in cash flows from operations in 2002 was
attributable to the increase in overcollected regulatory balancing
accounts, partially offset by the tax effect associated with these
balancing accounts.

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES

For the six-month period ended June 30, 2002, the increase in cash flows
used in investing activities compared to the corresponding period in
2001 was primarily due to advances to Sempra Energy, which are payable
on demand, and increased capital expenditures.

Capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment are estimated to
be $400 million for the full year 2002 and are being financed primarily
by internally generated funds and security issuances. Construction,
investment and financing programs are continuously reviewed and revised
in response to changes in competition, customer growth, inflation,
customer rates, the cost of capital, and environmental and regulatory
requirements.

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES

For the six-month period ended June 30, 2002, cash flows from financing
activities decreased from the corresponding period in 2001 due primarily
to the remarketing of variable-rate debt during the first quarter of
2001, which appears as both payments and issuances on the Condensed
Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows.

In May 2002, SDG&E and SoCalGas replaced their individual revolving
lines of credit with a combined revolving credit agreement under which
each utility may individually borrow up to $300 million, subject to a
combined borrowing limit for both utilities of $500 million. Each
utility's revolving credit line expires on May 16, 2003, at which time
it may convert its then outstanding borrowings to a one-year term loan
subject to having obtained any requisite regulatory approvals relating
to long-term debt. Borrowings under the agreement, which are available
for general corporate purposes including back-up support for commercial
paper and variable-rate long-term debt, would bear interest at rates
varying with market rates and the individual borrowing utility's credit
rating. The agreement requires each utility individually to maintain a
debt-to-total capitalization ratio (as defined in the agreement) of not
to exceed 60%. The rights, obligations and covenants of each utility
under the agreement are individual rather than joint with those of the
other utility, and a default by one utility would not constitute a
default by the other. These lines of credit were unused at June 30,
2002.

In April 2002, Fitch, Inc. confirmed its prior credit ratings of the
company's debt; Standard & Poor's reduced its ratings of the company's
secured debt one notch from AA- with a negative outlook to A+ with a
stable outlook and made corresponding adjustments in the ratings and
outlook of the company's other debt; and Moody's Investors Service,
Inc., confirmed its prior ratings of the short-term debt and variable
rate demand bonds of SDG&E, but placed its ratings of the other debt of
SDG&E under review for possible downgrade.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The company's net income increased for the three-month and six-month
periods ended June 30, 2002, compared to the corresponding period in
2001 primarily due to a $25 million after-tax benefit from the favorable
resolution of income-tax issues from prior years, partially offset by
increased depreciation expense. Second quarter 2001 results included a
$7 million after-tax benefit from incentive awards. The timing of these
awards varies and none was recorded in second quarter 2002 results.

The tables below summarize electric and natural gas volumes and revenues
by customer class for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2002 and
2001.

Electric Distribution and Transmission
(Volumes in millions of kWhrs, dollars in millions)

Gas Sales, Transportation and Exchange
(Volumes in billion cubic feet, dollars in millions)

The decreases in electric revenues and in electric fuel and net
purchased power expense were primarily due to the effect of lower
electric commodity costs, which are passed on to customers without
markup, and decreased off-system sales and the DWR's purchases of
SDG&E's net short position beginning in February 2001. Under the current
regulatory framework, changes in commodity costs normally do not affect
net income, as explained in the Annual Report, subject to the mechanisms
under performance-based ratemaking as explained in the Annual Report.

The decreases in natural gas revenues and in the cost of natural gas
purchased for resale were primarily due to lower natural gas commodity
prices. Under the current regulatory framework, changes in natural gas
commodity prices do not affect net income since, as explained more fully
in the Annual Report, current or future customer rates normally recover
the actual commodity cost of natural gas, subject to the mechanisms
under performance-based ratemaking as explained in the Annual Report.

FACTORS INFLUENCING FUTURE PERFORMANCE

Performance of the company will depend primarily on the ratemaking and
regulatory process, electric and natural gas industry restructuring, and
the changing energy marketplace. These factors are discussed in the
company's Annual Report.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station

The end of ICIP (see Note 2 of the notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements) will return SONGS to traditional rate-setting mechanisms in
2004, resulting in no significant earnings until new plant additions at
SONGS accumulate to significant amounts. SDG&E has requested a
rehearing of this decision as it is contrary to the market-based
pricing contemplated in the overall mechanism adopted by the CPUC in
1996. Market-based treatment would provide positive earnings if the
plant's operating costs were below the revenues produced by sales to
the competitive market.

Gas and Electric Rates

On May 8, 2002, SDG&E filed its 2003 Cost of Capital application with
the CPUC, requesting an increase in its authorized return on equity from
10.6 percent to 12.5 percent. If adopted, this change would result in a
revenue requirement increase of $30.7 million ($24.2 million electric
and $6.5 million gas), effective January 1, 2003. The CPUC's Office of
Ratepayer Advocates has recommended a return of 10.5 percent. The CPUC
is expected to rule on the matter by the end of the year.

SDG&E has a Gas Procurement PBR mechanism that allows SDG&E to receive a
share of the savings it achieves by buying natural gas for customers
below a monthly benchmark. In March 2002, SDG&E requested a reward of $7
million for the PBR natural gas procurement period ending July 31, 2001.
No reward will be included in SDG&E's earnings until it is approved by
the CPUC, which is expected by the end of 2002.

On June 17, 2002, SDG&E amended its March 21, 2002 joint application
with Southern California Edison requesting the CPUC to set contribution
levels for the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) nuclear
decommissioning trust funds. SDG&E requested a rate increase to cover
its share of total projected increased decommissioning costs for SONGS.
If approved, the current annual contribution to SDG&E's trust funds
would increase to $11.5 million annually from $4.9 million. Prior to
August 1999, SDG&E's annual contribution had been $22 million.

In July 2002, the CPUC Energy Division issued a Draft Resolution (DR)
approving SDG&E's 2000 Performance-Based Ratemaking (PBR) report. The DR
approves SDG&E's request for a total net reward of $11.7 million, as
well as SDG&E's actual 2000 rate of return (applicable only to electric
distribution and gas transportation) of 8.74 percent, which is below the
authorized 8.75 percent. This results in no sharing of earnings in 2000
under the PBR sharing mechanism described in the company's Annual
Report. A final CPUC decision is expected by the end of the third
quarter 2002. The financial results herein do not include the pending
award.

The California utilities will file applications with the CPUC in
December 2002 to set new base rates. A CPUC decision is expected in late
2003, with new rates to become effective in 2004.

The California utilities have earned rewards for successful
implementation of Demand-Side Management programs that have been
scheduled by the CPUC for payout over several years. In a recent ruling,
a CPUC Administrative Law Judge has indicated an intent to reanalyze the
uncollected portion of past rewards earned by utilities (which have not
been included in SDG&E's income), and potentially recompute the amount
of the rewards. The California utilities will oppose the recomputation.

NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued two
statements, SFAS 142 "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" and SFAS 143
"Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations." The former is not
presently relevant to the company. SFAS 143 addresses financial
accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement
of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs.

In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS 144 "Accounting for the Impairment
or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets" that replaces SFAS 121, "Accounting
for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be
Disposed Of." SFAS 144 applies to all long-lived assets, including
discontinued operations. See further discussion in Note 1 of the notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements.

ITEM 3. MARKET RISK

There have been no significant changes in the risk issues affecting the
company subsequent to those discussed in the Annual Report. As noted in
that report, SDG&E may, at times, be exposed to limited market risk in
its natural gas purchase and sale activities as a result of activities
under SDG&E's gas Performance-Based Regulation mechanism. The risk is
managed within the parameters of the company's market-risk management
and trading framework.

As of June 30, 2002, the total Value at Risk of SDG&E's natural gas
positions was not material.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Except as described in Note 2 of the notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements, neither the company nor its subsidiary is party to, nor is
their property the subject of, any material pending legal proceedings
other than routine litigation incidental to their businesses.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a) Exhibits

Exhibit 12 - Computation of ratios

12.1 Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed
Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends.

(b) Reports on Form 8-K

There were no reports on Form 8-K filed after March 31, 2002.

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
SDG&E has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
(Registrant)

Date: August 13, 2002 By: /s/ D.L. Reed
-----------------------------
D.L. Reed
President and
Chief Financial Officer