Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

[ X ] Yes                          [    ] No

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act

[ X ] Yes                          [    ] No

As of May 9, 2003, there were outstanding 27,923,939 common shares, no par value, of the Registrant.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

     Consolidation: Irwin Financial Corporation and its subsidiaries provide financial services throughout the United States and Canada. We are engaged in the mortgage banking, commercial banking, home equity lending, commercial finance, and venture capital lines of business. Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

     Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

     Trading Assets: Trading assets are stated at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses are included in earnings. Included in trading assets are residual interests. In the past, when we sold receivables in securitizations of home equity loans and lines of credit, we retained residual interests, a servicing asset, one or more subordinated tranches, and in some cases a cash reserve account, all of which are retained interests in the securitized receivables. Gain or loss on the sale of the receivables depends in part on the previous carrying amount of the financial assets involved in the transfer, allocated between the assets sold and the retained interests based on their relative fair value at the date of transfer.

     To obtain fair value of residual interests, quoted market prices are used if available. However, quotes are generally not available for residual interests, so we generally estimate fair value based on the present value of expected cash flows using estimates of the key assumptions -- prepayment speeds, credit losses, and discount rates commensurate with the risks involved -- that management believes market participants would use to value similar assets. Adjustments to carrying values are recorded as trading gains or losses. An adjustment of $17.8 million was recorded in the first quarter of 2003 to write down the residual interests due to increased prepayment speeds and expected credit losses.

     Cash and Cash Equivalents Defined: For purposes of the statement of cash flows, we consider cash and due from banks to be cash equivalents.

     Stock-Based Employee Compensation: At March 31, 2003, we have two stock-based employee compensation plans. We use the intrinsic value method to account for our plans under the recognition and measurement principles of APB Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and related Interpretations. No stock-based employee compensation cost is reflected in net income for any of the periods presented, as all options granted under these plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. The Board of Directors has not chosen to expense stock options. The Board wishes to analyze new guidance from the FASB, SEC or other relevant authority regarding the standardization of valuation methods, should such guidance be forthcoming. In the absence of a uniform valuation method for public companies, we will continue to disclose in this footnote the impact of expensing stock options, using our valuation m ethod, which is based on a Black-Scholes model using several assumptions management believes to be reasonable. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if we had applied the fair value recognition provisions of FASB Statement No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," using our valuation method to stock-based employee compensation:

     Recent Accounting Developments

     In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities" which requires existing unconsolidated variable interest entities to be consolidated by their primary beneficiaries if the entities do not effectively disperse risks among parties involved. The primary beneficiary is the party that absorbs a majority of expected losses, receives a majority of expected residual returns, or both, as a result of holding variable interests, which are the ownership, contractual, or other pecuniary interests in the entity. They are required to disclose the (a) nature, purpose, size, and activities of the variable interest entity, (b) the carrying amount and classification of assets that are collateral, and (c) any lack of recourse by creditors to the primary beneficiary. If a primary interest is not held, but a significant variable interest is held, disclosure requirements include (1) the nature, purpose, size and activities of the va riable interest entity, (2) exposure to loss, (3) the date and nature of involvement with the entity. This interpretation applies immediately to variable interests created or obtained after January 31, 2003 for interim periods beginning after June 15, 2003. Prior to 2002, we used securitization structures involving qualified special purpose entities (QSPEs) which are exempt from the requirements of this interpretation. As a result, management does not believe the implementation of Interpretation No. 46 will have a material effect on our earnings or financial position.

     Reclassifications: Certain amounts in the 2002 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2003 presentation. These changes had no impact on previously reported net income or shareholders' equity.


Note 2 - Loans and Leases

     Loans and leases are summarized as follows:

Note 3 - Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

     Changes in the allowance for loan and lease losses are summarized below:

Note 4 - Servicing Assets

     Included on the consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002 are $211.6 million and $174.9 million, respectively, of capitalized servicing assets. These amounts relate to the principal balances of mortgage and home equity loans serviced by us for investors. Changes in our capitalized servicing assets, net of valuation allowance, are shown below:

     We have established a valuation allowance to record servicing assets at their fair value. Changes in the allowance are summarized below:

Note 5 - Short-term Borrowings

     Short-term borrowings are summarized as follows:

     Drafts payable related to mortgage loan closings are related to mortgage closings that have not been presented to the banks for payment. When presented for payment, these borrowings will be funded internally or by borrowing from the lines of credit.

     The majority of our commercial paper is payable to a company controlled by a significant shareholder and director of the Corporation.

     Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings are collateralized by loans and loans held for sale.

     We also have lines of credit available to fund loan originations and operations. Interest on the lines of credit is payable monthly or quarterly with variable rates ranging from 1.5% to 2.5% at March 31, 2003.

Note 6 - Collateralized Debt

     Beginning in the second quarter of 2002, we began securitizing loans using secured financing structures at our home equity lending line of business. In 2003, we also began securitizing leases at our commercial finance line of business using secured financing structures. Sale treatment was precluded on these transactions as we maintained effective control over the loans and leases securitized. This type of securitization structure results in cash being received, debt being recorded, and the establishment of an allowance for credit losses. The notes associated with these transactions are collateralized by $0.7 billion in leases and home equity loans and home equity lines of credit classified on the balance sheet as loans and leases held for investment (Note 2). The principal and interest on these debt securities are paid using the cash flows from the underlying loans and leases. Accordingly, the timing of the principal payments on these debt securities is dependent on th e payments received on the underlying collateral. The interest rates on the bonds are at a floating rate. We also received $7.1 million for an interest only senior note on both securitizations at the home lending line of business which as of March 31, 2003 had a combined notional balance of $61.7 million. These senior notes pay interest at 10%, and mature on December 25, 2004 and September 25, 2005.

     Collateralized debt is summarized as follows:

Note 7 - Earnings per Share

     Earnings per share calculations are summarized as follow:

     At March 31, 2003 and 2002, 769,534 and 1,011,473 shares, respectively, related to stock options, were not included in the dilutive earnings per share calculation because the options' exercise price was greater than the market price of the common stock.

Note 8 - Industry Segment Information

     We have five principal segments that provide a broad range of financial services. The mortgage banking line of business originates, sells, and services residential first mortgage loans throughout the United States. The commercial banking line of business provides commercial banking services in seven Midwestern and Rocky Mountain states. The home equity lending line of business originates and services home equity loans throughout the United States. The commercial finance line of business originates leases and loans against commercial equipment and real estate throughout the United States (U.S.) and Canada. The venture capital line of business invests in early-stage U.S. technology companies focusing on financial services. Our other segment primarily includes the parent company and eliminations.

     The accounting policies of each segment are the same as those described in the "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies." Below is a summary of each segment's revenues, net income, and assets for three months ended March 31, 2003, and 2002:

Note 9 - Contingencies

     Our indirect subsidiary, Irwin Mortgage Corporation, is a defendant in a class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama alleging that Irwin Mortgage violated the federal Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) relating to Irwin Mortgage's payment of broker fees to mortgage brokers. In June 2001, the Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit upheld the district court's certification of a plaintiff class and the case was remanded for further proceedings in the federal district court. In September 2001, a second suit sought class status and consolidation with this suit.

     In November 2001, by order of the district court, the parties filed supplemental briefs analyzing the impact of a new policy statement from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) that explicitly disagrees with the judicial interpretation of RESPA by the Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit in its ruling upholding class certification in this case. In response to a motion from Irwin Mortgage, in March 2002, the district court granted Irwin Mortgage's motion to stay proceedings in this case until the 11th Circuit decided the three other RESPA cases originally argued before it with this case. The second suit seeking consolidation with this one was similarly stayed.

     The 11th Circuit has now decided all of the RESPA cases pending in that court. In one of those cases, the 11th Circuit concluded that the trial court had abused its discretion in certifying a class action under RESPA. Further, in that decision, the 11th Circuit expressly recognized it was, in effect, overruling its previous decision upholding class certification in this case. In March 2003, Irwin Mortgage filed a motion to decertify the class and the plaintiffs filed a renewed motion for summary judgment.

     If the class is not decertified and the district court finds that Irwin Mortgage violated RESPA, Irwin Mortgage could be liable for damages equal to three times the amount of that portion of payments made to the mortgage brokers that is ruled unlawful. Based on notices sent by the plaintiffs to date to potential class members and additional notices that might be sent in this case, we believe the class is not likely to exceed 32,000 borrowers who meet the class specifications.

     In addition to this case and the case seeking consolidation with it, three other lawsuits were filed against Irwin Mortgage in 2002 in the Circuit Court of Calhoun County, Alabama seeking class action status and allege claims based on payments similar to those at issue in this case. Another case filed in 2002 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama alleges RESPA violations both similar to and different from those in this case in connection with payments made to mortgage brokers. In April, 2003, Irwin Mortgage and the plaintiffs reached an agreement in principle to settle the three cases in Calhoun County, Alabama, for a nonmaterial amount.

     Irwin Mortgage intends to defend this and the related lawsuits vigorously and believes it has numerous defenses to the alleged RESPA and similar violations. Irwin Mortgage further believes that the 11th Circuit's recent RESPA decisions provide grounds for reversal of the class certification in this case. We have no assurance, however, that Irwin Mortgage will be successful in defeating class certification in this case or will ultimately prevail on the merits in this or the other cases. However, we expect that an adverse outcome in this or the related cases could result in substantial monetary damages that could be material to our financial position. We have not established any reserves for this or the related cases and are unable at this stage of the litigation to form a reasonable estimate of potential loss that we could suffer.

     In January 2001, we and Irwin Leasing Corporation (formerly Affiliated Capital Corp.), our indirect subsidiary, and Irwin Equipment Finance Corporation, our direct subsidiary (together, the Irwin companies), were served as defendants in an action filed in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. The suit alleges that a manufacturer/importer of certain medical devices made misrepresentations to health care professionals and to government officials to improperly obtain Medicare reimbursement for treatments using the devices, and that the Irwin companies, through Affiliated Capital's financing activities, aided in making the alleged misrepresentations. The Irwin companies filed a motion to dismiss on February 12, 2001. On August 10, 2001, the court granted our motion in part by dismissing Irwin Financial and Irwin Equipment Finance as defendants in the suit. We have not established any reserves for this case. At this stage of the litigation, we are unable to form a reasonable estimate of the amount of potential loss, if any, that Irwin Leasing could suffer.

     Our subsidiary, Irwin Union Bank and Trust Company, is a defendant in a purported class action lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court in Massachusetts in July 2001. The case involves loans purchased by Irwin Union Bank and Trust from an unaffiliated third-party originator. The plaintiffs allege that the loan documents did not comply with certain provisions of the Truth in Lending Act relating to high rate loans. The complaint seeks rescission of the loans and other damages. On September 30, 2002, the court granted plaintiffs' motion for certification of a class, subject to certain limitations. We filed a motion for reconsideration with the district court and a petition for permission to appeal the class certification decision with the Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit. Discovery has not yet commenced. If the class is ultimately upheld, the actual number of plaintiff borrowers will be determined only after a review of loan files. We believe that out of approximately 200 loans acquired directly from the third-party originator and approximately 7,800 loans acquired from others through bulk acquisitions, only a portion of these loans will qualify for inclusion in the class. Because this case is in the early stages of litigation, we are unable to form a reasonable estimate of potential loss, if any, and have not established any reserves related to this case.

     Our indirect subsidiary, Irwin Mortgage Corporation, is a defendant in a case filed in August, 1998 in the Baltimore, Maryland, City Circuit. On January 25, 2002, a jury in this case awarded the plaintiffs damages of $1.434 million jointly and severally against defendants, including Irwin Mortgage. The nine plaintiff borrowers alleged that a home rehabilitation company defrauded the plaintiffs by selling them defective homes at inflated prices and that Irwin Mortgage, which provided the plaintiff borrowers mortgage loans on the home purchases, participated in the fraud. Irwin Mortgage filed an appeal with the Maryland Court of Special Appeals. Oral argument was held on January 7, 2003. We have reserved for this case based upon advice of our legal counsel. Although we believe Irwin Mortgage has justifiable grounds for appeal, we cannot predict at this time whether the appeal will ultimately be successful.

     We and our subsidiaries are from time to time engaged in various matters of litigation, including the matters described above, other assertions of improper or fraudulent loan practices or lending violations, and other matters, and we have a number of unresolved claims pending. In addition, as part of the ordinary course of business, we and our subsidiaries are parties to litigation involving claims to the ownership of funds in particular accounts, the collection of delinquent accounts, challenges to security interests in collateral, and foreclosure interests, that is incidental to our regular business activities. While the ultimate liability with respect to these other litigation matters and claims cannot be determined at this time, we believe that damages, if any, and other amounts relating to pending matters are not likely to be material to our consolidated financial position or results of operations, except as described above. Reserves have been established for these vario us matters of litigation, when appropriate, based upon the advice of legal counsel.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

About Forward-looking Statements

     You should read the following discussion in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements, footnotes, and tables. This discussion and other sections of this report contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and are including this statement for purposes of invoking these safe harbor provisions. Words such as "anticipated," "assume," "assumptions," "attempt," "believe," "continues," "could," "estimate," "estimated," "expect," "expectations," "expected," "forecasts," "forward," "future," "judgment," "likely," &qu ot;may," "objectives," "possible," "projected," "projections," "strategy," "unlikely," "will," "would," and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, which may include, among other things:

• statements and assumptions relating to projected growth, earnings, earnings per share, and other financial performance measures as well as management's short-term and long-term performance goals;
• statements relating to the anticipated effects on results of operations or financial condition from recent and expected developments or events;
• statements relating to our business and growth strategies, including potential acquisitions; and
• any other statements, projections or assumptions that are not historical facts.

     Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause our actual results, performance or achievements, or industry results, to differ materially from our expectations of future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. In addition, our past results of operations do not necessarily indicate our future results. Actual future results may differ materially from what is projected due to a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, potential changes in interest rates, which may affect consumer demand for our products and the valuation of our servicing portfolio; staffing fluctuations in response to product demand; the relative profitability of our lending operations, including our correspondent mortgage loan originations; management of our servicing portfolios, including short-term swings in valuation of such portfolios due to quarter-end secondary market interest rates, which are inherently volatile; borrowers' refinancing opportunities, which may affect the prepayment assumptions used in our valuation estimates; unanticipated deterioration in the credit quality of our assets; difficulties in delivering products to the secondary market as planned or in securitizing our products as planned; difficulties in expanding our businesses or raising capital and other funding sources as needed; competition from other financial service providers for experienced managers as well as for customers; changes in the value of companies in which we invest; changes in variable compensation plans related to the performance and valuation of lines of business where we tie compensation systems to line-of-business performance; legislative or regulatory changes, including changes in the interpretation of regulatory capital rules, disclosure or consumer lending rules or rules affecting corporate governance; changes in applicable accounting policies or principles or their application t o our business; or governmental changes in monetary or fiscal policies. Further, geopolitical uncertainty may negatively impact the financial services industry or cause changes in or exaggerate the effects of the factors described above. We undertake no obligation to update publicly any of these statements in light of future events, except as required in subsequent periodic reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

Consolidated Overview

Noninterest Income

     Noninterest income during the first quarter of 2003 totaled $69.6 million, compared to $51.6 million for the first three months of 2002. The increase in 2003 versus 2002 was primarily a result of a 137.3% increase in gain from sale of loans at the mortgage banking line of business as a result of market conditions and increased production resulting in increased secondary market deliveries. Partially offsetting these increases were higher amortization and impairment expense related to mortgage servicing rights as a result of declining interest rates and higher trading losses related to our residual assets due to increased prepayment speed and expected credit losses.

Noninterest Expense

     Noninterest expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2003 totaled $105.6 million, compared to $70.2 million for the same period in 2002. The increase in consolidated noninterest expense in 2003 is primarily related to higher personnel costs associated with our increased production at the mortgage banking line of business.

Consolidated Balance Sheet Analysis

     Total assets at March 31, 2003 were $5.4 billion, up 9.3% from December 31, 2002. However, we believe that changes in the average balance sheet are a more accurate reflection of the actual changes in the level of activity on the balance sheet. Average assets for the first quarter of 2003 were $4.8 billion, up 18.9% from the average assets in 2002. The growth in the consolidated balance sheet reflects increases in portfolio loans and leases at the commercial banking, home equity lending and commercial finance lines of business. Also, there was significant growth in loans held for sale at the mortgage banking line of business during the first quarter of 2003.

Loans and Leases

     Our commercial loans and leases are originated throughout the United States and Canada. At March 31, 2003, 4.3% of our loan and lease portfolio was with our Canadian operation. We also extend credit to consumers in the United States through mortgages, installment loans and revolving credit arrangements. The majority of the remaining portfolio consists of residential mortgage loans (1-4 family dwellings) and mortgage loans on commercial property. Loans by major category for the periods presented were as follows:

Investment Securities

The following table shows the composition of our investment securities at the dates indicated:

Deposits

     Total deposits for the first quarter of 2003 averaged $2.8 billion compared to deposits for the year 2002 that averaged $2.4 billion. Demand deposits for the first quarter of 2003 averaged $786.2 million, a 36.2% increase over the average balance for the year 2002. A significant portion of demand deposits is related to deposits at Irwin Union Bank and Trust, which are associated with escrow accounts held on loans in the servicing portfolio at the mortgage banking line of business. During the first quarter of 2003, these escrow accounts averaged $587.1 million compared to an average of $409.4 million for the year 2002.

     Irwin Union Bank and Trust utilizes institutional broker-sourced deposits as funding from time to time to supplement deposits solicited through branches and other wholesale funding sources. At March 31, 2003, institutional broker-sourced deposits totaled $432 million compared to a balance of $337 million at December 31, 2002. The increase in brokered deposits in 2003 relates to the increased funding needed to support the balance sheet growth in loans and loans held for sale, coupled with a desire to maintain a laddering of longer term wholesale funding.

Short-Term Borrowings

     Short-term borrowings during the first quarter of 2003 averaged $708.7 million compared to an average of $600.8 million for the year 2002. The increase in 2003 relates to the increased use of Federal Home Loan Bank advances to support the increase in first mortgages held for sale.

Long-Term and Collateralized Debt

     Long-term debt totaled $30.1 million at March 31, 2003, relatively unchanged from December 31, 2002. Collateralized debt totaled $711.1 million at March 31, 2003, compared to $391.4 million at December 31, 2002. The increased debt relates to secured financing transactions in the first quarter at our home equity lending and commercial finance lines of business. These securitization structures result in loans remaining as assets and debt borrowings being recorded on the balance sheet. The securitization debt represents match-term funding for these loans and leases.

Capital

     Shareholders' equity averaged $362.6 million during the first quarter of 2003, up 13.3% compared to the average for the year 2002. Shareholders' equity balance of $371.5 million at March 31, 2003 represented $13.35 per common share, compared to $12.98 per common share at December 31, 2002. We paid $1.9 million in dividends in the first quarter of 2003, reflecting an increase of $0.0025 per share compared to a year ago.

     The following table sets forth our capital and capital ratios at the dates indicated: