UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
X |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES |
|
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002
OR
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES |
|
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from |
|
to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exact
name of registrant as specified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-3198 |
|
Idaho Power Company |
|
82-0130980 |
|
|
1221 W. Idaho Street |
|
|
|
|
Boise, ID 83702-5627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telephone: (208) 388-2200 |
|
|
|
|
State of Incorporation: Idaho |
|
|
|
|
|
|
None |
Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.
Indicate by check mark whether
the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
X No ___
Number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of June 30, 2002: |
37,612,351 shares, all of which |
|
are held by IDACORP, Inc. |
GLOSSARY |
||
|
||
AFDC |
- |
Allowance for Funds used During Construction |
APB |
- |
Accounting Principles Board |
BPA |
- |
Bonneville Power Administration |
CSPP |
- |
Cogeneration and Small Power Production |
DIG |
- |
Derivatives Implementation Group |
DSM |
- |
Demand-Side Management |
EITF |
- |
Emerging Issues Task Force |
EPA |
- |
Environmental Protection Agency |
FASB |
- |
Financial Accounting Standards Board |
FERC |
- |
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission |
FPA |
- |
Federal Power Act |
Ida-West |
- |
Ida-West Energy, a subsidiary of IDACORP, Inc. |
IE |
- |
IDACORP Energy, a subsidiary of IDACORP, Inc. |
IFS |
- |
IDACORP Financial Services, a subsidiary of IDACORP, Inc. |
IPC |
- |
Idaho Power Company |
IPUC |
- |
Idaho Public Utilities Commission |
IRP |
- |
Integrated Resource Plan |
kW |
- |
kilowatt |
kWh |
- |
kilowatt-hour |
MD&A |
- |
Management's Discussion and Analysis |
MW |
- |
Megawatt |
MWh |
- |
Megawatt-hour |
OPUC |
- |
Oregon Public Utility Commission |
PCA |
- |
Power Cost Adjustment |
PURPA |
- |
Public Utilities Regulatory Policy Act |
REA |
- |
Rural Electrification Administration |
RFP |
- |
Request for proposals |
RTOs |
- |
Regional Transmission Organizations |
SFAS |
- |
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards |
SPPCo |
- |
Sierra Pacific Power Company |
Valmy |
- |
North Valmy Steam Electric Generating Plant |
INDEX
Page |
||||
|
||||
Part I. Financial Information: |
||||
|
Item 1. Financial Statements (unaudited) |
|
||
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Income |
4-5 |
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets |
6-7 |
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Capitalization |
8 |
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows |
9 |
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income |
10 |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
11-17 |
|
|
|
Independent Accountants' Report |
18 |
|
|
||||
|
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial |
|||
|
|
Condition and Results of Operations |
19-29 |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
29 |
||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Part II. Other Information: |
||||
|
||||
|
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
30 |
||
|
||||
|
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K |
31-34 |
||
|
||||
Signatures |
35 |
|||
FORWARD LOOKING INFORMATION
This Form 10-Q contains "forward-looking statements" intended to
qualify for the safe harbor from liability established by the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Forward-looking statements should be read with the cautionary statements
and important factors included in this Form 10-Q at Part I, Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Forward-Looking Information. Forward-looking statements are all
statements other than statements of historical fact, including without
limitation those that are identified by the use of the words
"anticipates," "estimates," "expects,"
"intends," "plans," "predicts" and similar
expressions.
PART I -
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Idaho Power Company
Consolidated Statements of Income
(unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
||||||
|
|
June 30, |
||||||
|
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
||||
|
|
(thousands of dollars) |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
General business |
|
$ |
187,564 |
|
$ |
156,207 |
|
|
Off-system sales |
|
|
10,976 |
|
|
58,650 |
|
|
Other revenues |
|
|
10,528 |
|
|
13,073 |
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
209,068 |
|
|
227,930 |
EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Operation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased power |
|
|
31,184 |
|
|
169,419 |
|
|
Fuel expense |
|
|
21,708 |
|
|
22,351 |
|
|
Power cost adjustment |
|
|
42,165 |
|
|
(68,086) |
|
|
Other |
|
|
36,839 |
|
|
34,074 |
|
Maintenance |
|
|
16,141 |
|
|
15,535 |
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
23,184 |
|
|
21,448 |
|
|
Taxes other than income taxes |
|
|
5,160 |
|
|
5,409 |
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
176,381 |
|
|
200,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS |
|
|
32,687 |
|
|
27,780 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
OTHER INCOME: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Allowance for equity funds used during construction |
|
|
54 |
|
|
361 |
|
|
Other - net |
|
|
3,835 |
|
|
2,518 |
|
|
|
Total other income |
|
|
3,889 |
|
|
2,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
INTEREST CHARGES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Interest on long-term debt |
|
|
12,237 |
|
|
14,750 |
|
|
Other interest |
|
|
2,483 |
|
|
2,603 |
|
|
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction |
|
|
(1,127) |
|
|
(1,251) |
|
|
|
Total interest charges |
|
|
13,593 |
|
|
16,102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
|
|
22,983 |
|
|
14,557 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
INCOME TAXES |
|
|
9,149 |
|
|
6,838 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS |
|
|
13,834 |
|
|
7,719 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Income from operations of energy marketing transferred to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
parent (net of tax of $18,195) |
|
|
- |
|
|
27,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
NET INCOME |
|
|
13,834 |
|
|
34,785 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Dividends on preferred stock |
|
|
1,298 |
|
|
1,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
EARNINGS ON COMMON STOCK |
|
$ |
12,536 |
|
$ |
33,493 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
Idaho Power
Company
Consolidated Statements of Income
(unaudited)
|
|
Six Months Ended |
||||||
|
|
June 30, |
||||||
|
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
||||
|
|
(thousands of dollars) |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
General business |
|
$ |
373,684 |
|
$ |
289,328 |
|
|
Off-system sales |
|
|
31,135 |
|
|
113,898 |
|
|
Other revenues |
|
|
18,835 |
|
|
25,019 |
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
423,654 |
|
|
428,245 |
EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Operation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased power |
|
|
61,374 |
|
|
294,706 |
|
|
Fuel expense |
|
|
49,636 |
|
|
47,597 |
|
|
Power cost adjustment |
|
|
76,225 |
|
|
(126,332) |
|
|
Other |
|
|
73,683 |
|
|
71,541 |
|
Maintenance |
|
|
28,161 |
|
|
27,216 |
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
46,355 |
|
|
42,399 |
|
|
Taxes other than income taxes |
|
|
10,346 |
|
|
10,644 |
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
345,780 |
|
|
367,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS |
|
|
77,874 |
|
|
60,474 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
OTHER INCOME: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Allowance for equity funds used during construction |
|
|
43 |
|
|
586 |
|
|
Other - net |
|
|
10,964 |
|
|
7,178 |
|
|
|
Total other income |
|
|
11,007 |
|
|
7,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
INTEREST CHARGES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Interest on long-term debt |
|
|
25,554 |
|
|
28,173 |
|
|
Other interest |
|
|
4,974 |
|
|
4,820 |
|
|
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction |
|
|
(1,320) |
|
|
(2,416) |
|
|
|
Total interest charges |
|
|
29,208 |
|
|
30,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
|
|
59,673 |
|
|
37,661 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
INCOME TAXES |
|
|
22,954 |
|
|
14,592 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS |
|
|
36,719 |
|
|
23,069 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Income from operations of energy marketing transferred to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
parent (net of tax of $33,573) |
|
|
- |
|
|
49,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
NET INCOME |
|
|
36,719 |
|
|
73,012 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Dividends on preferred stock |
|
|
2,660 |
|
|
2,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
EARNINGS ON COMMON STOCK |
|
$ |
34,059 |
|
$ |
70,259 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
Idaho Power
Company
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(unaudited)
Assets
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|||||
|
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|||||
|
|
(thousands of dollars) |
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
ELECTRIC PLANT: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
In service (at original cost) |
|
$ |
3,020,057 |
|
$ |
2,989,630 |
||
|
Accumulated provision for depreciation |
|
|
(1,260,763) |
|
|
(1,220,002) |
||
|
|
In service - Net |
|
|
1,759,294 |
|
|
1,769,628 |
|
|
Construction work in progress |
|
|
100,271 |
|
|
86,010 |
||
|
Held for future use |
|
|
2,232 |
|
|
2,232 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Electric plant - Net |
|
|
1,861,797 |
|
|
1,857,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
INVESTMENTS AND OTHER PROPERTY |
|
|
37,969 |
|
|
37,432 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
8,045 |
|
|
43,040 |
||
|
Receivables: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Customer |
|
|
80,735 |
|
|
58,702 |
|
|
|
Allowance for uncollectible accounts |
|
|
(1,500) |
|
|
(1,500) |
|
|
|
Notes |
|
|
5,449 |
|
|
3,488 |
|
|
|
Employee notes |
|
|
7,255 |
|
|
6,274 |
|
|
|
Related parties |
|
|
25,491 |
|
|
37,517 |
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
3,715 |
|
|
2,280 |
|
|
Taxes receivable |
|
|
- |
|
|
8,244 |
||
|
Accrued unbilled revenues |
|
|
41,715 |
|
|
37,400 |
||
|
Materials and supplies (at average cost) |
|
|
22,796 |
|
|
23,280 |
||
|
Fuel stock (at average cost) |
|
|
9,491 |
|
|
8,726 |
||
|
Prepayments |
|
|
32,762 |
|
|
31,897 |
||
|
Regulatory assets |
|
|
14,204 |
|
|
55,107 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Total current assets |
|
|
250,158 |
|
|
314,455 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
DEFERRED DEBITS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
American Falls and Milner water rights |
|
|
31,585 |
|
|
31,585 |
||
|
Company-owned life insurance |
|
|
38,758 |
|
|
39,602 |
||
|
Regulatory assets |
|
|
461,412 |
|
|
544,134 |
||
|
Other |
|
|
35,131 |
|
|
34,626 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Total deferred debits |
|
|
566,886 |
|
|
649,947 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
TOTAL |
|
$ |
2,716,810 |
|
$ |
2,859,704 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
Idaho Power Company
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(unaudited)
Capitalization and
Liabilities
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|||||
|
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|||||
|
|
|
(thousands of dollars) |
||||||
CAPITALIZATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Common stock equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Common stock, $2.50 par value (50,000,000 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
authorized; 37,612,351 shares outstanding) |
|
$ |
94,031 |
|
$ |
94,031 |
|
|
Premium on capital stock |
|
|
362,631 |
|
|
362,602 |
|
|
|
Capital stock expense |
|
|
(4,209) |
|
|
(4,144) |
|
|
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
315,935 |
|
|
316,856 |
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(4,966) |
|
|
(3,719) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Total common stock equity |
|
|
763,422 |
|
|
765,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
104,266 |
|
|
104,387 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
672,330 |
|
|
802,201 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Total capitalization |
|
|
1,540,018 |
|
|
1,672,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Long-term debt due within one year |
|
|
107,079 |
|
|
27,078 |
||
|
Notes payable |
|
|
240,350 |
|
|
282,000 |
||
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
31,927 |
|
|
68,806 |
||
|
Notes and accounts payable to related parties |
|
|
2,545 |
|
|
6,931 |
||
|
Taxes accrued |
|
|
43,112 |
|
|
- |
||
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
|
- |
|
|
40,528 |
||
|
Interest accrued |
|
|
11,966 |
|
|
13,115 |
||
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
14,204 |
|
|
14,578 |
||
|
Other |
|
|
33,369 |
|
|
16,118 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
484,552 |
|
|
469,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
DEFERRED CREDITS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
518,565 |
|
|
541,482 |
||
|
Derivative liabilities - long-term |
|
|
- |
|
|
7,253 |
||
|
Regulatory liabilities |
|
|
116,777 |
|
|
113,957 |
||
|
Other |
|
|
56,898 |
|
|
55,644 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Total deferred credits |
|
|
692,240 |
|
|
718,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
$ |
2,716,810 |
|
$ |
2,859,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
Idaho Power Company
Consolidated Statements of Capitalization
(unaudited)
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
||||||||||||
|
|
2002 |
|
% |
|
2001 |
|
% |
||||||||
|
|
(thousands of dollars) |
||||||||||||||
COMMON STOCK EQUITY: |
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Common stock |
|
$ |
94,031 |
|
|
|
$ |
94,031 |
|
|
|||||
|
Premium on capital stock |
|
|
362,631 |
|
|
|
|
362,602 |
|
|
|||||
|
Capital stock expense |
|
|
(4,209) |
|
|
|
|
(4,144) |
|
|
|||||
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
315,935 |
|
|
|
|
316,856 |
|
|
|||||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(4,966) |
|
|
|
|
(3,719) |
|
|
|||||
|
|
Total common stock equity |
|
|
763,422 |
|
50 |
|
|
765,626 |
|
46 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
PREFERRED STOCK: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
4% preferred stock |
|
|
14,266 |
|
|
|
|
14,387 |
|
|
|||||
|
7.68% Series, serial preferred stock |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|||||
|
7.07% Series, serial preferred stock |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|||||
|
Auction rate preferred stock |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|||||
|
|
Total preferred stock |
|
|
104,266 |
|
7 |
|
|
104,387 |
|
6 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
LONG-TERM DEBT: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
First mortgage bonds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
6.85% Series due 2002 |
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
||||
|
|
6.40% Series due 2003 |
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
||||
|
|
8 % Series due 2004 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
||||
|
|
5.83% Series due 2005 |
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
||||
|
|
7.38% Series due 2007 |
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
||||
|
|
7.20% Series due 2009 |
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
||||
|
|
6.60% Series due 2011 |
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
||||
|
|
7.50% Series due 2023 |
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
||||
|
|
8.75% Series due 2027 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
Total first mortgage bonds |
|
|
577,000 |
|
|
|
|
627,000 |
|
|
|||
|
|
Amount due within one year |
|
|
(107,000) |
|
|
|
|
(27,000) |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
Net first mortgage bonds |
|
|
470,000 |
|
|
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
|||
|
Pollution control revenue bonds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
8.30% Series 1984 due 2014 |
|
|
49,800 |
|
|
|
|
49,800 |
|
|
||||
|
|
6.05% Series 1996A due 2026 |
|
|
68,100 |
|
|
|
|
68,100 |
|
|
||||
|
|
Variable Rate Series 1996B due 2026 |
|
|
24,200 |
|
|
|
|
24,200 |
|
|
||||
|
|
Variable Rate Series 1996C due 2026 |
|
|
24,000 |
|
|
|
|
24,000 |
|
|
||||
|
|
Variable Rate Series 2000 due 2007 |
|
|
4,360 |
|
|
|
|
4,360 |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
Total pollution control revenue bonds |
|
|
170,460 |
|
|
|
|
170,460 |
|
|
|||
|
REA notes |
|
|
1,224 |
|
|
|
|
1,263 |
|
|
|||||
|
|
Amount due within one year |
|
|
(79) |
|
|
|
|
(78) |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
Net REA notes |
|
|
1,145 |
|
|
|
|
1,185 |
|
|
|||
|
American Falls bond guarantee |
|
|
19,885 |
|
|
|
|
19,885 |
|
|
|||||
|
Milner Dam note guarantee |
|
|
11,700 |
|
|
|
|
11,700 |
|
|
|||||
|
Unamortized premium/discount - Net |
|
|
(860) |
|
|
|
|
(1,029) |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
|
672,330 |
|
43 |
|
|
802,201 |
|
48 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
TOTAL CAPITALIZATION |
|
$ |
1,540,018 |
|
100 |
|
$ |
1,672,214 |
|
100 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
Idaho Power Company
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|||||||||
|
|
June 30, |
|||||||||
|
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|||||||
|
|
(thousands of dollars) |
|||||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Net income |
|
$ |
36,719 |
|
$ |
73,012 |
||||
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
(used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Allowance for uncollectible accounts |
|
|
- |
|
|
20,174 |
|||
|
|
Unrealized gains from energy marketing activities |
|
|
- |
|
|
(101,317) |
|||
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
52,801 |
|
|
48,297 |
|||
|
|
Deferred taxes and investment tax credits |
|
|
(19,502) |
|
|
86,503 |
|||
|
|
Undistributed earnings of affiliates |
|
|
- |
|
|
(52) |
|||
|
|
Accrued PCA costs |
|
|
71,562 |
|
|
(127,031) |
|||
|
|
Change in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Accounts receivable and prepayments |
|
|
(27,411) |
|
|
9,703 |
||
|
|
|
Accrued unbilled revenue |
|
|
(4,315) |
|
|
(2,714) |
||
|
|
|
Materials and supplies and fuel stock |
|
|
(281) |
|
|
(2,374) |
||
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(41,265) |
|
|
20,911 |
||
|
|
|
Taxes receivable/accrued |
|
|
51,356 |
|
|
(22,226) |
||
|
|
|
Other current assets and liabilities |
|
|
16,103 |
|
|
2,174 |
||
|
|
Other - net |
|
|
963 |
|
|
(6,355) |
|||
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
136,730 |
|
|
(1,295) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Additions to utility plant |
|
|
(52,102) |
|
|
(87,718) |
||||
|
Note receivable payment from parent |
|
|
12,162 |
|
|
- |
||||
|
Other - net |
|
|
(205) |
|
|
(2,443) |
||||
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(40,145) |
|
|
(90,161) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Issuance of first mortgage bonds |
|
|
- |
|
|
120,000 |
||||
|
Retirement of first mortgage bonds |
|
|
(50,000) |
|
|
(75,000) |
||||
|
Dividends on common stock |
|
|
(34,980) |
|
|
(34,914) |
||||
|
Dividends on preferred stock |
|
|
(2,660) |
|
|
(2,753) |
||||
|
Increase in short-term borrowings |
|
|
(41,650) |
|
|
15,800 |
||||
|
Other - net |
|
|
(2,290) |
|
|
(3,749) |
||||
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(131,580) |
|
|
19,384 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(34,995) |
|
|
(72,072) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
43,040 |
|
|
83,494 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
8,045 |
|
$ |
11,422 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
INFORMATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Cash paid (received) during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
(8,459) |
|
$ |
- |
|||
|
|
Interest (net of amount capitalized) |
|
|
29,184 |
|
|
29,703 |
|||
|
|
Net assets transferred to parent for notes receivable |
|
|
- |
|
|
76,250 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
Idaho Power
Company
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|||||||
|
|
June 30, |
|||||||
|
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|||||
|
|
(thousands of dollars) |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
NET INCOME |
|
$ |
13,834 |
|
$ |
34,785 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities (net of tax of ($618) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
and $156) |
|
|
(951) |
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
|
$ |
12,883 |
|
$ |
35,024 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Six Months Ended |
||||||
|
|
June 30, |
||||||
|
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
||||
|
|
(thousands of dollars) |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
NET INCOME |
|
$ |
36,719 |
|
$ |
73,012 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities (net of tax of ($771) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and ($925)) |
|
|
(1,247) |
|
|
(1,608) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
|
$ |
35,472 |
|
$ |
71,404 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements
Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
Nature
of Business
Idaho Power
Company is an electric utility regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission and the state regulatory commissions of Idaho, Oregon, and Wyoming,
and is engaged in the generation, transmission, distribution, sale and purchase
of electric energy. We are the parent
of Idaho Energy Resources Co., a joint venturer in Bridger Coal Company, which
supplies coal to our Jim Bridger generating plant.
References
in this report to "we," "us" and "our" are to
Idaho Power Company and its subsidiary.
The
outstanding shares of our common stock were exchanged on a share-for-share
basis into common stock of IDACORP, Inc. on October 1, 1998 and are no longer
actively traded. Our preferred stock
and debt securities were unaffected and remain outstanding.
Effective
June 11, 2001 we transferred our wholesale electricity marketing operations
(Energy Marketing) to IDACORP Energy (IE).
After the transfer of Energy Marketing, we consist of one operating
segment, Utility Operations. The
Utility Operations segment has two primary sources of income, our regulated
operations and income from our joint venture in Bridger Coal Company.
Beginning
August 1, 2002, we resumed the function of buying and selling wholesale
electricity to support our utility operations.
Financial Statements
In our
opinion, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain
all adjustments necessary to present fairly our consolidated financial position
as of June 30, 2002, and our consolidated results of operations for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 and consolidated cash flows for the
six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001.
These financial statements do not contain the complete detail or
footnote disclosure concerning accounting policies and other matters that would
be included in full year financial statements and therefore they should be read
in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements included in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001. The results of operations for the interim
periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the
full year.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include our accounts and the
accounts of our wholly-owned subsidiary.
All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been
eliminated in consolidation.
Investments in business entities in which we do not have control, but
have the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial
policies, are accounted for using the equity method.
Adopted Accounting Standards
In January
2002, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) 144,
"Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets." SFAS 144 addresses
financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived
assets, superseding SFAS 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived
Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of." The adoption of SFAS 144 did not have a
significant effect on our financial statements.
In
June 2001, the Derivative Implementation Group of the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation C-15, "Scope Exceptions: Normal Purchases and Normal Sales Exception
for Option-Type Contracts and Forward Contracts in Electricity,"
concluding that contracts subject to book-out were not eligible for the normal
purchase and sales exception in SFAS 133, "Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities."
Therefore, certain contracts were recorded as derivatives in prior
periods. However, this Interpretation
was revised in October 2001 and December 2001, and now allows these contracts
to qualify for the exception. This
revision applies only to electric utilities due to the unique nature of the
industry. We have completed an evaluation
of the effect of this revised Interpretation on the treatment of booked out contracts
and have determined that contracts previously classified as derivatives are
exempt. The effect of the change does
not have a material effect on our financial statements.
New Accounting
Pronouncements
In August
2001, the FASB issued SFAS 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations," which is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15,
2002. This Statement addresses
financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement
of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. An obligation may result from the
acquisition, construction, development and the normal operation of a long-lived
asset. We are currently assessing but
have not yet determined the impact of SFAS 143 on our financial statements.
In
June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with
Exit or Disposal Activities." The
standard requires companies to recognize costs associated with exit or disposal
activities when they are incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to an
exit or disposal plan. Examples of
costs covered by the standard include lease termination costs and certain
employee severance costs that are associated with a restructuring, discontinued
operation, plant closing or other exit or disposal activity. This standard supersedes Emerging Issues
Task Force Issue No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee
Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain
Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)."
SFAS 146 is to be applied prospectively to exit or disposal activities
initiated after December 31, 2002. We
are currently assessing but have not yet determined the impact of SFAS 146 on
our financial statements.
2. INCOME TAXES:
Our
effective tax rate for the first six months decreased from 39.7 percent in 2001
to 38.5 percent in 2002.
Reconciliations between the statutory income tax rate and the effective
rates are as follows (in thousands of dollars):
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
||||||||||||
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
||||||||||
|
Amount |
|
Rate |
|
Amount |
|
Rate |
||||||
Computed income taxes based on statutory |
|
||||||||||||
|
federal income tax rate |
$ |
20,886 |
|
35.0% |
|
$ |
42,412 |
|
35.0% |
|||
Changes in taxes resulting from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Investment tax credits |
|
(1,600) |
|
(2.7) |
|
|
(1,552) |
|
(1.3) |
|||
|
Repair allowance |
|
(1,400) |
|
(2.3) |
|
|
(1,400) |
|
(1.2) |
|||
|
Pension expense |
|
(26) |
|
- |
|
|
(912) |
|
(0.8) |
|||
|
State income taxes |
|
2,942 |
|
4.9 |
|
|
5,667 |
|
4.7 |
|||
|
Depreciation |
|
2,821 |
|
4.7 |
|
|
3,799 |
|
3.1 |
|||
|
Other |
|
(669) |
|
(1.1) |
|
|
151 |
|
0.2 |
|||
Total provision for federal and state income taxes |
$ |
22,954 |
|
38.5% |
|
$ |
48,165 |
|
39.7% |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
3. PREFERRED STOCK:
The
number of shares of preferred stock outstanding were as follows:
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
||
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
||
Cumulative, $100 par value: |
|
|
|
||
|
4% preferred stock (authorized 215,000 shares) |
142,661 |
|
143,872 |
|
|
Serial preferred stock, 7.68% Series (authorized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000 shares) |
150,000 |
|
150,000 |
Serial preferred stock, cumulative, without par |
|
|
|
||
|
value; total of 3,000,000 shares authorized: |
|
|
|
|
|
7.07% Series, $100 stated value, (authorized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000 shares) |
250,000 |
|
250,000 |
|
Auction rate preferred stock, $100,000 stated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
value, (authorized 500 shares) |
500 |
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
We are
planning to redeem our action rate preferred stock on August 15, 2002 for $50
million. This redemption will be
financed with internally generated funds or short-term borrowings.
4. FINANCING:
We
have regulatory authority to incur up to $350 million of short-term
indebtedness. This amount will increase
to $400 million from September 1, 2002 to October 15, 2002. We also have a $200 million 364-day
revolving credit facility that expires in March 2003, under which we pay a
facility fee on the commitment quarterly in arrears, based on our corporate
credit rating. Commercial paper may be
issued subject to the regulatory maximum up to the amount supported by the
credit facilities. At June 30, 2002,
our short-term borrowing under this facility totaled $140 million. We also have $100 million of floating rate
notes outstanding, payable on September 1, 2002.
We currently
have a $200 million shelf registration that can be used for first mortgage
bonds, including medium-term notes, unsecured debt or preferred stock. At June 30, 2002 none had been issued.
In March
2002, $50 million of First Mortgage Bonds 8.75% Series due 2027 were redeemed
early using short-term borrowings.
5. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES:
Commitments
under contracts and purchase orders relating to our program for construction
and operation of facilities amounted to approximately $4 million at June 30,
2002. The commitments are generally
revocable by us subject to reimbursement of manufacturers' expenditures
incurred and/or other termination charges.
From
time to time we are a party to various legal claims, actions and complaints,
certain of which may involve material amounts.
Although we are unable to predict with certainty whether or not we will
ultimately be successful in these legal proceedings, or, if not, what the
impact might be, based upon the advice of legal counsel, management presently
believes that disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse
effect on our financial statements.
6. REGULATORY ISSUES:
Deferred
Power Supply Costs
Idaho: Our Power Cost Adjustment (PCA) mechanism provides for annual
adjustments to the rates charged to Idaho retail customers. These adjustments, which typically take
effect annually in May, are based on forecasts of net power supply
expenses. During the year, the
difference between actual and forecasted costs is deferred with interest. The balance of this deferral, called a
true-up, is then included in the calculation of the next year's PCA adjustment.
On May 13, 2002 the Idaho Public Utility Commission
(IPUC) issued Order No. 29026 related to the 2002-2003 PCA rate filing. The order granted recovery of $255 million
of excess power supply costs, consisting of:
$209 million of voluntary load reduction and power supply costs incurred between March 1, 2001 and March 31, 2002.
$28 million of excess power supply costs forecasted for the period April 2002-March 2003.
$18 million of unamortized costs previously approved for recovery beginning October 1, 2001. The amount authorized in October 2001 totaled $49 million. This order spreads the October rate increase, which would have ended in September 2002, through May 2003.
The order also:
Denied recovery of $12 million of lost revenues resulting from the irrigation load reduction program, and $2 million of other costs we sought to recover.
Authorized recovery over a one-year period for all but $11.5 million of the $255 million of deferred costs. In June 2002, the IPUC issued Order No. 29065 deferring a portion of the May 16, 2002 PCA rate increase applied to certain industrial customers, deferring recovery of approximately $4 million. The remaining amounts will be recovered during the 2003-2004 PCA rate year, and we will earn a six percent carrying charge on the balance.
Denied our request to issue $172 million in Energy Cost Recovery Bonds, which would have spread the recovery of that amount over three years.
Discontinued the Commission-required three-tiered rate structure for residential customers.
Authorized a separate surcharge to collect approximately $2.6 million to fund future conservation programs.
The
IPUC had previously issued an order disallowing the lost revenue portion of the
irrigationload
reduction program. We believe that the
Commission's order is inconsistent with an earlier order that allowed recovery
of such costs and we filed a Petition for Reconsideration on May 2, 2002. The process we have embarked upon has a
number of steps involved and could extend into the early fall. If we are unsuccessful in our efforts before
the IPUC to overturn the denial, this amount will be written off in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. If denied by the IPUC, the matter would then
be appealed to the Idaho Supreme Court.
Oregon: We filed an application with the Oregon Public Utility Commission
(OPUC) to begin recovering extraordinary 2001 power supply costs in our Oregon
jurisdiction. On June 18, 2001, the
OPUC approved new rates that would recover less than $1 million over the next
year. Under the provisions of the
deferred accounting statute, annual rate recovery amounts were limited to three
percent of our 2000 gross revenues in Oregon.
During the 2001 session, the Oregon Legislature amended the statute
giving the OPUC authority to increase the maximum annual rate of recovery of
deferred amounts to six percent for electric utilities. We subsequently filed, on October 5, 2001,
to recover an additional three percent extraordinary deferred power supply
costs. As a result of this filing, the
OPUC issued Order No. 01-994 allowing us to increase our rate of recovery to
six percent effective November 28, 2001.
Deferred
power supply costs consist of the following (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
||||
|
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Oregon deferral |
|
$ |
14,742 |
|
$ |
14,866 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Idaho PCA current deferral: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Deferral for 2001-2002 rate year |
|
|
- |
|
|
78,395 |
|
|
Deferral for 2002-2003 rate year |
|
|
(685) |
|
|
- |
|
|
Irrigation load reduction program |
|
|
12,345 |
|
|
69,586 |
|
|
Astaris load reduction agreement |
|
|
6,016 |
|
|
62,247 |
|
|
Irrigation and small general service deferral for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
recovery in the 2003-2004 rate year |
|
|
11,703 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Idaho PCA true-up: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Remaining true-up authorized October 2001 |
|
|
- |
|
|
36,500 |
|
|
Remaining true-up authorized May 2001 |
|
|
- |
|
|
42,895 |
|
|
Remaining true-up authorized May 2002 |
|
|
188,806 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
Total deferral |
|
$ |
232,927 |
|
$ |
304,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FMC/Astaris Settlement
Agreement
On January 8, 2002, the IPUC initiated an investigation to examine the load
reduction rates contained in our Voluntary Load Reduction (VLR) Agreement with
FMC/Astaris. This VLR Agreement amended
the Electric Service Agreement (ESA) that governs the delivery of electric
service to FMC/Astaris' Pocatello plant.
On June 6, 2002, we, along with FMC/Astaris, signed and filed a proposed
Stipulation and Settlement Agreement (Agreement) with the IPUC and on June 10,
2002, the IPUC approved the Agreement in Order No. 29050 which included the
following provisions:
The VLR payments that we make to FMC/Astaris through May 2003 were decreased $5 million, reducing overall payments to $37 million. Approximately 90 percent of this reduction will flow through the PCA mechanism as a reduction in costs to Idaho retail customers.
FMC/Astaris agreed to dismiss, with prejudice, a declaratory judgment action concerning the FMC/Astaris contract that it had previously filed against us in the Fourth Judicial District for the State of Idaho.
FMC/Astaris will pay us approximately $31 million through March 2003 to settle the ESA.
Garnet
Power Purchase Agreement
We had entered
into a power purchase agreement (PPA) with Garnet Energy, LLC (Garnet), a
subsidiary of Ida-West, to purchase energy produced by Garnet's to-be-built
natural gas generation facility. A
hearing was scheduled for July 23, 2002 on our application for an order
approving the PPA and an accounting order authorizing the inclusion of power
supply expenses associated with the purchase of capacity and energy from Garnet
in the PCA.
Garnet
informed us that there was a substantial likelihood that it would be unable to
obtain the financing at acceptable terms necessary to construct the
facility. Garnet has further advised
that there may be alternative financing arrangements that could allow Garnet to
obtain financing within the constraints of the PPA. However, pursuing alternative financing arrangements will require
additional time. As a result we sought
a continuance in the hearing scheduled for July 23, 2002.
On
July 24, 2002, the IPUC issued their ruling effectively closing the proceeding
involving our petition to enter into a PPA with Garnet. We were directed to return in 90 days with a
report on (1) the status of Garnet's progress in obtaining financing for the
project and (2) how we propose to meet future power requirements if Garnet is not
built.
Application
to Defer Extraordinary Costs Associated With Security Measures
In November 2001,
we filed an application requesting the IPUC to issue an accounting order
authorizing the deferral of extraordinary costs associated with increased
security measures subsequent to the events of September 11, 2001. The additional or extraordinary security
measures are needed to help ensure the safety of our employees and to protect
company facilities. At June 30, 2002,
$1 million of extraordinary security costs had been deferred. In March 2002 the IPUC issued Order No.
28975 directing the following related to these costs:
Costs in excess of $11,000 per month are to be deferred in a regulatory asset account.
Such costs incurred in 2001 are to be amortized over a five-year period beginning in January 2003. Costs deferred in each subsequent year are to be amortized beginning in January of the next calendar year.
Deferred costs are to receive the appropriate carrying charge.
Costs are to be allocated among our various jurisdictions and affiliates.
The IPUC defers making a final decision regarding final allocation of deferred security expenses to other affiliates and sharing with shareholders until such time as the IPUC conducts its prudence review of the expenses.
Truckee-Donner Public
Utility District
On July 23, 2002, Truckee-Donner Public Utility District located in the State
of California, filed a complaint against IPC, IE and IDACORP with the FERC
seeking relief under its long-term power contract for the purchase of wholesale
electric power from IPC and IE.
The
Complaint requests that FERC, among other matters, (1) reform or terminate the
contract under Section 206 of the Federal Power Act, (2) order refunds, (3)
assert exclusive jurisdiction over the rate issues and exercise primary
jurisdiction to consider state-law claims arising out of the contract
provisions and underlying facts, and (4) assess the market power of IE and IPC
within the Sierra Pacific and IPC control areas under the FERC's Supply Margin
Assessment test and impose appropriate remedies if the test is not passed.
California
Energy Situation
On May 8, 2002 the FERC issued a data request to all sellers of Wholesale
Electricity and/or Ancillary Services to the Cal ISO and/or the CalPX during
the years 2000-2001. The request required
IPC and IE to respond in the form of an affidavit to various trading practices
that the FERC identified in its fact-finding investigation of Potential
Manipulation of Electric and Natural Gas Prices in Docket No. PA02-2-000. IPC and IE filed a response on May 22,
2002. This response indicated that
although they did export energy from the CalPX outside of California during the
period 2000-2001, they did not engage in any trading strategy described in the
Enron memoranda. The energy was resold
to supply preexisting load obligations, to supply term transactions or to
supply a contemporaneous sales transaction.
The companies denied all other ten activities identified by the
FERC. IPC and IE filed additional
responses with the FERC on May 31 and June 5, 2002. In the May 31 response, the companies denied engaging in the
activity referred to as "wash," "round trip" or
"sell/buyback" trading involving the sale of an electricity product to
another company together with a simultaneous purchase of the same product at
the same price. In the June 5 response,
where the data request was directed to all sellers of natural gas in the
Western Systems Coordinating Council and/or Texas during the years 2000-2001,
the companies denied engaging in the activity referred to as "wash,"
"round trip" or "sell/buyback" trading involving the sale
of natural gas together with a simultaneous purchase of the same product at the
same price.
IDACORP Energy and Idaho
Power Company Agreement
We entered into an Electricity Supply Management Services Agreement (Agreement)
with IE in June 2001. The IPUC is
currently assessing issues associated with this Agreement. While some of the issues likely became moot with
the decision to wind down IE's trading operation, the IPUC staff has indicated
its desire to continue to review whether adequate compensation has been
provided to our customers as a result of transactions with IE after February
2001. Similar issues arising prior to
February 2001 were resolved by IPUC Order No. 28852.
7. RELATED PARTY:
For the six
months ended June 30, 2002, we have paid IE approximately $2 million under the
Electricity Supply Management Services Agreement.
Additionally,
we sold $6 million and $18 million in off-system sales to IE for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2002, and purchased $7 million and $9 million in
purchased power from IE for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002.
INDEPENDENT
ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT
Idaho
Power Company
Boise, Idaho
We
have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and statement of
capitalization of Idaho Power Company and its subsidiary as of June 30, 2002,
and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for
the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 and consolidated
statements of cash flows for the six month periods ended June 30, 2002 and
2001. These financial statements are
the responsibility of the Company's management.
We
conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
A review of interim financial information consists principally of
applying analytical procedures to financial data and of making inquiries of
persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an
audit conducted in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the
United States of America, the objective of which is the expression of an
opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an
opinion.
Based
on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be
made to such consolidated financial statements for them to be in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We
have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America, the consolidated balance sheet and
statement of capitalization of Idaho Power Company and its subsidiary as of
December 31, 2001, and the related consolidated statements of income,
comprehensive income, retained earnings, and cash flows for the year then ended
(not presented herein); and in our report dated January 31, 2002, we expressed
an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in
the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and statement of capitalization as
of December 31, 2001 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to
the consolidated balance sheet and statement of capitalization from which it
has been derived.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE
LLP
Boise,
Idaho
July 29, 2002
Item
2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands, except
per share amounts. Megawatt hours (MWH)
in thousands.)
INTRODUCTION:
In
Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) we explain the general
financial condition and results of operations for Idaho Power Company (IPC) and
subsidiary.
IPC
is an electric utility with a service territory covering over 20,000 square
miles in southern Idaho and eastern Oregon.
IPC is the parent of Idaho Energy Resources, Co., a joint venturer in
Bridger Coal Company, which supplies coal to IPC's Jim Bridger generating plant.
References
in this report to "we", "us" and "our" are to IPC
and its subsidiary.
Effective
June 11, 2001 we transferred our wholesale electricity marketing operations
(Energy Marketing) to IDACORP Energy (IE).
After the transfer of Energy Marketing, we consist of one operating
segment, Utility Operations. The
Utility Operations segment has two primary sources of income, our regulated
operations and income from our joint venture in Bridger Coal Company.
Beginning
August 1, 2002, we resumed the function of buying and selling wholesale
electricity to support our utility operations.
This MD&A should be read in conjunction
with the accompanying consolidated financial statements. This discussion updates our MD&A
included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2001, and should be read in conjunction with the discussion in the annual
report.
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION:
In
connection with the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995 (Reform Act), we are hereby filing cautionary statements
identifying important factors that could cause our actual results to differ
materially from those projected in forward-looking statements (as such term is
defined in the Reform Act) made by us or on our behalf in this quarterly report
on Form 10-Q, in presentations, in response to questions or otherwise. Any statements that express, or involve
discussions as to expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, assumptions or
future events or performance (often, but not always, through the use of words
or phrases such as "anticipates," "believes,"
"estimates," "expects," "intends,"
"plans," "predicts," "projects," "will
likely result," "will continue" or similar expressions) are not
statements of historical facts and may be forward-looking. Forward-looking statements involve
estimates, assumptions and uncertainties and are qualified in their entirety by
reference to, and are accompanied by, the following important factors, which
are difficult to predict, contain uncertainties, are beyond our control and may
cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in
forward-looking statements:
prevailing governmental policies and regulatory actions, including those of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), the Idaho Public Utility Commission (IPUC) and the Oregon Public Utility Commission (OPUC), with respect to allowed rates of return, industry and rate structure, acquisition and disposal of assets and facilities, operations and construction of plant facilities, recovery of purchased power and other capital investments, present or prospective wholesale and retail competition (including but not limited to retail wheeling and transmission costs) and other refund proceedings;
the current energy situation in the western United States;
economic and geographic factors including political and economic risks;
changes in and compliance with environmental and safety laws and policies;
weather conditions;
population growth rates and demographic patterns;
competition for retail and wholesale customers;
pricing and transportation of commodities;
market demand, including structural market changes;
changes in tax rates or policies, or interest rates or in rates of inflation;
changes in project costs;
unanticipated changes in operating expenses and capital expenditures;
capital market conditions;
rating actions by Moody's, Standard & Poor's (S&P) and Fitch IBCA (Fitch);
competition for new energy development opportunities; and
legal and administrative proceedings (whether civil or criminal) and settlements that influence our business and profitability;
new accounting or Securities and Exchange Commission requirements, or new interpretation or application of existing requirements.
Any forward-looking statement speaks only as
of the date on which such statement is made.
New factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for
management to predict all such factors, nor can it assess the impact of any
such factor on the business, or the extent to which any factor, or combination
of factors, may cause results to differ materially from those contained in any
forward-looking statement.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS:
The three months increase in income from
continuing operations is due to a $23 million decrease in operation expenses
offset by a $19 million decrease in revenue.
The decrease in operating expenses is attributed to decreased purchased
power of $138 million offset by increased Power Cost Adjustment (PCA) expense
component of $110 million. The decrease
in revenues is due to decreased off-system sales of $48 million offset by
increased general business revenues of $32 million.
The
six months increase in income from continuing operations is due to a decrease
of $22 million in operating expenses offset by a $5 million decrease in
revenues. The decrease in operating
expenses is attributed to decreased purchased power of $234 million offset by
the increased PCA expense component of $202 million. The decreased revenue is due to a $6 million decrease in other
transmission revenues and decreased off-system sales of $83 million offset by
an $84 million increase in general business revenues.
On July 12, 2002 our customers set a record for power use - 2,963 megawatts (MW). The previous record, 2,919 MW, was set on July 12, 2000.
General
Business Revenue
The following
table presents general business revenue and MWH sales for the three and six
months ended June 30:
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
Revenue |
|
MWH |
|
Revenue |
|
MWH |
|||||||||||||
|
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Residential |
|
$ |
60,948 |
|
$ |
50,411 |
|
887 |
|
834 |
|
$ |
155,102 |
|
$ |
120,146 |
|
2,244 |
|
2,184 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
47,863 |
|
|
39,002 |
|
838 |
|
809 |
|
|
96,449 |
|
|
71,707 |
|
1,714 |
|
1,643 |
|
Industrial |
|
|
43,530 |
|
|
38,037 |
|
790 |
|
998 |
|
|
86,649 |
|
|
68,570 |
|
1,564 |
|
2,062 |
|
Irrigation |
|
|
35,223 |
|
|
28,757 |
|
666 |
|
571 |
|
|
35,484 |
|
|
28,905 |
|
669 |
|
573 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
187,564 |
|
$ |
156,207 |
|
3,181 |
|
3,212 |
|
$ |
373,684 |
|
$ |
289,328 |
|
6,191 |
|
6,462 |
General
business revenue is dependent on many factors, including the number of
customers served, the rates charged and economic and weather conditions. The change in revenues in 2002 is due
primarily to the following:
The annual PCA resulted in increased revenues of approximately $30 million and $90 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002. The PCA is discussed in more detail below in "Regulatory Issues."
Population growth in our service territory increased approximately 2 percent, resulting in a $2 million increase in revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002.
FMC/Astaris, previously our largest volume customer, closed its manufacturing plants late in 2001. However, based on a take or pay contract with FMC/Astaris which requires payment for power regardless of delivery, we have continued to receive payments from FMC/Astaris since their plant closures. Accordingly, we show a significant decrease in usage of $9 million and $17 million offset by increased price variances of $9 million and $19 million. The net effect is an increase of less than $1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and a net increase of $2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002.
Usage and weather factors decreased revenues $1 million and $8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002. As discussed above, FMC/Astaris usage decreased revenues $9 million and $17 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002. This decrease was offset by increased usage in our other customer classes due to an increase in cooling degree days of approximately 15 percent. Cooling degree days are a common measure used in the utility industry to analyze demand.
Off-system
sales
Off-system sales
consist primarily of sales of surplus system energy when available, and
long-term sales contracts. Revenues
decreased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 due primarily to
lower wholesale electricity prices. The following table presents off-system
sales for the three and six months ended June 30:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
||||||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
||||||||
|
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-system sales |
|
$ |
10,976 |
|
$ |
58,650 |
|
$ |
31,135 |
|
$ |
113,898 |
MWHs |
|
|
431 |
|
|
535 |
|
|
1,253 |
|
|
1,030 |
Revenue per MWH |
|
$ |
25.47 |
|
$ |
109.63 |
|
$ |
24.85 |
|
$ |
110.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased
power
The decrease in
purchased power is due to reduced wholesale electricity prices and our
decreased need for wholesale electricity.
Load reduction program costs are also included in purchased power for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001. The following table presents purchased power
expenses for the three and six months ended June 30:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|||||||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|||||||||
|
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|||||
Purchased Power: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases |
|
$ |
23,349 |
|
$ |
131,838 |
|
$ |
36,513 |
|
$ |
257,124 |
|
Program costs |
|
|
7,835 |
|
|
37,581 |
|
|
24,861 |
|
|
37,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MWHs |
|
|
821 |
|
|
869 |
|
|
1,301 |
|
|
1,442 |
|
Cost per MWH |
|
$ |
28.44 |
|
$ |
151.69 |
|
$ |
28.06 |
|
$ |
178.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel expense
Fuel expense for the three months ended June 30, 2002 was substantially
unchanged as decreased generation was offset by increased coal prices. Fuel expenses increased $3 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2002 due to increased coal prices and the use of the new
Danskin natural gas-fired plant, offset by decreased generation at the
coal-fired plants. The following table
presents fuel expense for the three and six months ended June 30:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
||||||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
||||||||
|
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel expense |
|
$ |
21,708 |
|
$ |
22,351 |
|
$ |
49,636 |
|
$ |
47,597 |
Thermal MWHs generated |
|
|
1,492 |
|
|
1,697 |
|
|
3,413 |
|
|
3,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PCA
The PCA
expense component is related to the PCA regulatory mechanism. In 2001, actual power supply costs were
significantly greater than forecasted, resulting in a large PCA credit, which
is now being recovered in rates (as revenues) and the deferred balance is being
amortized as PCA expense. FMC/Astaris
and irrigation program cost deferrals also affect the PCA. The PCA is discussed in more detail below in
"Regulatory Issues."
The following table presents the components
of PCA expense for the three and six months ended June 30:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|||||||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|||||||||
|
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current year power supply costs accrual (deferral) |
|
$ |
1,049 |
|
$ |
(53,760) |
|
$ |
4,570 |
|
$ |
(110,757) |
|
Astaris and irrigation program costs (deferral) |
|
|
(5,994) |
|
|
(33,063) |
|
|
(19,019) |
|
|
(33,063) |
|
Amortization of prior year authorized balances |
|
|
45,650 |
|
|
18,737 |
|
|
89,214 |
|
|
17,488 |
|
Write-off of disallowed costs |
|
|
1,460 |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,460 |
|
|
- |
|
|
Total power cost adjustment |
|
$ |
42,165 |
|
$ |
(68,086) |
|
$ |
76,225 |
|
$ |
(126,332) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Taxes
Income taxes
decreased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 due primarily to the
decreases in net income before taxes.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES:
Cash
Flow
Our net cash
provided by operations totaled $137 million for the six months ended June 30,
2002. Significant factors affecting
cash flows in 2002 include:
the receipt of a $28 million income tax refund related to net operating loss carrybacks associated with 2001 power supply costs, offset by tax payments of $20 million;
the recovery through the PCA of power supply costs incurred in 2000 and 2001.
We anticipate that our cash flows from
operations will continue to be positively affected as we recover the remaining
balance of the 2002 PCA. We discuss the
PCA in the section "Regulatory Issues" below.
Cash Expenditures
We forecast that
internal cash generation after dividends will be sufficient to meet our total
capital requirements for 2002-2004. We
expect to finance our utility construction programs and other capital
requirements with both internally generated funds and, to the extent necessary,
externally financed capital.
Financing Program
We have regulatory authority to incur up to $350 million of short-term
indebtedness. This amount will increase
to $400 million from September 1, 2002 to October 15, 2002. We have a $200 million 364-day revolving
credit facility that expires in March 2003, under which we pay a facility fee
on the commitment quarterly in arrears, based on our corporate credit rating.
Commercial paper may be issued subject to the regulatory maximum, up to the
amount supported by the credit facilities.
At June 30, 2002, short term borrowing under this facility totaled $140
million. We also have $100 million of
floating rate notes outstanding, payable on September 1, 2002. We are in the process of replacing these
notes with comparable financing with a due date of approximately September
2003.
We
currently have a $200 million shelf registration that can be used for first
mortgage bonds, including medium-term notes, unsecured debt or preferred
stock. At June 30, 2002 none had been
issued.
In March
2002, $50 million First Mortgage Bonds 8.75% Series due 2027 were redeemed
using short-term borrowings.
We are planning to redeem our auction rate preferred
stock on August 15, 2002 for $50 million.
This redemption will be financed with internally generated funds or
short-term borrowings.
Credit Rating
On March 25, 2002,
S&P lowered its Corporate Credit Rating from "A+" (negative
outlook) to "A-" (negative outlook).
Our financial profile has been considerably weakened by the accumulation
of deferred power costs incurred during 2001.
On
May 16, 2002, Fitch lowered its ratings on our securities. Fitch stated that the new ratings better
reflect the earnings and cash flow volatility experienced during the recent
drought. Fitch stated that the new
ratings reflect the May 13, 2002 PCA order of the IPUC. Fitch also initiated coverage of our
commercial paper with an F1 rating. The
rating outlook is stable.
These
downgrades are expected to increase our future cost of debt and other
securities.
On June 27,
2002 S&P revised its outlook to positive from negative to reflect IDACORP's
decision to wind down the power marketing business at IDACORP Energy (IE). On August 1, 2002 S&P said that our
decision to review financing options on the Garnet project will not affect our
rating or outlook.
The
following outlines the former and current S&P and Fitch ratings of our
securities:
|
|
S & P |
|||
|
|
From |
|
To |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Credit Rating |
|
A+ |
|
A- |
|
Senior Unsecured |
|
A |
|
BBB+ |
|
Senior Secured |
|
AA- |
|
A |
|
Preferred Stock |
|
A- |
|
BBB |
|
Commercial Paper |
|
A-1 |
|
A-2 |
|
|
Fitch |
|||
|
|
From |
|
To |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Mortgage Bonds |
|
A+ |
|
A |
|
Senior Unsecured |
|
A |
|
A- |
|
Preferred Stock |
|
A |
|
BBB+ |
|
Commercial Paper |
|
- |
|
F1 |
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER
MATTERS:
Regulatory Issues:
Deferred Power
Supply Costs
Idaho: Our PCA mechanism provides for annual adjustments to the rates
charged to Idaho retail customers.
These adjustments, which typically take effect annually in May, are
based on forecasts of net power supply expenses. During the year, the difference between actual and forecasted
costs is deferred with interest. The
balance of this deferral, called a true-up, is then included in the calculation
of the next year's PCA adjustment.
On May 13, 2002, the IPUC issued Order No. 29026 related to the 2002-2003 PCA rate
filing. The order granted recovery of
$255 million of excess power supply costs, consisting of:
$209 million of voluntary load reduction and power supply costs incurred between March 1, 2001 and March 31, 2002.
$28 million of excess power supply costs forecasted for the period April 2002- March 2003.
$18 million of unamortized costs previously approved for recovery beginning October 1, 2001. The amount authorized in October 2001 totaled $49 million. This order spreads the October rate increase, which would have ended in September 2002, through May 2003.
The order also:
Denied recovery of $12 million of lost revenues resulting from the irrigation load reduction program, and $2 million of other costs we sought to recover.
Authorized recovery over a one-year period for all but $11.5 million of the $255 million of deferred costs. In June 2002, the IPUC issued Order No. 29065 deferring a portion of the May 16, 2002 PCA rate increase applied to certain industrial customers, deferring recovery of approximately $4 million. The remaining amounts will be recovered during the 2003-2004 PCA rate year, and will earn a six percent carrying charge on the balance.
Denied our request to issue $172 million in Energy Cost Recovery Bonds, which would have spread the recovery of that amount over three years.
Discontinued the Commission-required three-tiered rate structure for residential customers.
Authorized a separate annual surcharge to collect approximately $2.6 million annually to fund future conservation programs.
The IPUC had previously issued an order
disallowing the lost revenue portion of the irrigation load reduction
program. We believe that the
Commission's order is inconsistent with an earlier order that allowed recovery
of such costs and we filed a Petition for Reconsideration on May 2, 2002. The process we have embarked upon has a
number of steps involved and could extend into the early fall. If we are unsuccessful in our efforts before
the IPUC to overturn the denial, this amount will be written off in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. If denied by the IPUC, the
matter would then be appealed to the Idaho Supreme Court.
Oregon: We filed an application with the OPUC to begin recovering
extraordinary 2001 power supply costs in our Oregon jurisdiction. On June 18, 2001, the OPUC approved new
rates that would recover less than $1 million over the next year. Under the provisions of the deferred
accounting statute, annual rate recovery amounts were limited to three percent
of our 2000 gross revenues in Oregon.
During the 2001 session, the Oregon Legislature amended the statute
giving the OPUC authority to increase the maximum annual rate of recovery of
deferred amounts to six percent for electric utilities. We subsequently filed on October 5, 2001 to
recover an additional three percent extraordinary deferred power supply
costs. As a result of this filing, the
OPUC issued Order No. 01-994 allowing increased rates of recovery to six
percent effective November 28, 2001.
Deferred power supply costs consist of the
following:
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
||||
|
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Oregon deferral |
|
$ |
14,742 |
|
$ |
14,866 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Idaho PCA current deferral: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Deferral for 2001-2002 rate year |
|
|
- |
|
|
78,395 |
|
|
Deferral for 2002-2003 rate year |
|
|
(685) |
|
|
- |
|
|
Irrigation load reduction program |
|
|
12,345 |
|
|
69,586 |
|
|
Astaris load reduction agreement |
|
|
6,016 |
|
|
62,247 |
|
|
Irrigation and small general service deferral for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
recovery in the 2003-2004 rate year |
|
|
11,703 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Idaho PCA true-up: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Remaining true-up authorized October 2001 |
|
|
- |
|
|
36,500 |
|
|
Remaining true-up authorized May 2001 |
|
|
- |
|
|
42,895 |
|
|
Remaining true-up authorized May 2002 |
|
|
188,806 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Total deferral |
|
$ |
232,927 |
|
$ |
304,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
FMC/Astaris Settlement Agreement
On January 8,
2002, the IPUC initiated an investigation to examine the load-reduction rates
contained in our Voluntary Load Reduction (VLR) Agreement with
FMC/Astaris. This VLR Agreement amended
the Electric Service Agreement (ESA) that governs the delivery of electric
service to FMC/Astaris' Pocatello plant.
On June 6, 2002, we along with FMC/Astaris, signed and filed a proposed
Stipulation and Settlement Agreement (Agreement) with the IPUC and on June 10,
2002, the IPUC approved the Agreement in Order No. 29050 which included the
following provisions:
The VLR payments that we make to FMC/Astaris through May 2003 were decreased $5 million, reducing overall payments to $37 million. Approximately 90 percent of this reduction will flow through the PCA mechanism as a reduction in costs to Idaho retail customers.
FMC/Astaris agreed to dismiss, with prejudice, a declaratory judgment action concerning the FMC/Astaris contract that it had previously filed against us in the Fourth Judicial District for the State of Idaho.
FMC/Astaris will pay us approximately $31 million through March 2003 to settle the ESA.
Garnet
Power Purchase Agreement
We had entered
into a power purchase agreement (PPA) with Garnet Energy, LLC (Garnet), a
subsidiary of Ida-West, to purchase energy produced by Garnet's to-be-built
natural gas generation facility. A
hearing was scheduled for July 23, 2002 on our application for an order approving
the PPA and an accounting order authorizing the inclusion of power supply
expenses associated with the purchase of capacity and energy from Garnet in the
PCA.
Garnet
informed us that there was a substantial likelihood that it would be unable to
obtain the financing at acceptable terms necessary to construct the
facility. Garnet has further advised
that there may be alternative financing arrangements that could allow Garnet to
obtain financing within the constraints of the PPA. However, pursuing alternative financing arrangements will require
additional time. As a result we sought
a continuance in the hearing scheduled for July 23, 2002.
On July 24, 2002, the IPUC issued their
ruling effectively closing the proceeding involving our petition to enter into
a PPA with Garnet. We were directed to
return in 90 days with a report on (1) the status of Garnet's progress in
obtaining financing for the project and (2) how we propose to meet future power
requirements if Garnet is not built.
Application
to Defer Extraordinary Costs Associated With Security Measures
In November 2001,
we filed an application requesting the IPUC to issue an accounting order
authorizing the deferral of extraordinary costs associated with increased
security measures subsequent to the events of September 11, 2001. The additional or extraordinary security
measures are needed to help ensure the safety of our employees and to protect
company facilities. At June 30, 2002,
$1 million of extraordinary security costs had been deferred. In March 2002 the IPUC issued Order No.
28975 directing the following related to these costs:
Costs in excess of $11,000 per month are to be deferred in a regulatory asset account.
Such costs incurred in 2001 are to be amortized over a five-year period beginning in January 2003. Costs deferred in each subsequent year are to be amortized beginning in January of the next calendar year.
Deferred costs are to receive the appropriate carrying charge.
Costs are to be allocated among our various jurisdictions and affiliates.
The IPUC defers making a final decision regarding final allocation of deferred security expenses to other affiliates and sharing with shareholders until such time as the IPUC conducts its prudence review of the expenses.
Truckee-Donner Public
Utility District
On July 23, 2002, Truckee-Donner Public Utility District located in the State
of California, filed a complaint against IPC, IE and IDACORP with the FERC
seeking relief under its long-term power contract for the purchase of wholesale
electric power from IPC and IE.
The
Complaint requests that FERC, among other matters, (1) reform or terminate the
contract under Section 206 of the Federal Power Act, (2) order refunds, (3)
assert exclusive jurisdiction over the rate issues and exercise primary
jurisdiction to consider state-law claims arising out of the contract
provisions and underlying facts, and (4) assess the market power of IE and IPC
within the Sierra Pacific and IPC control areas under the FERC's Supply Margin
Assessment test and impose appropriate remedies if the test is not passed.
California
Energy Situation
On May 8, 2002 the FERC issued a data request to all sellers of Wholesale
Electricity and/or Ancillary Services to the Cal ISO and/or the CalPX during
the years 2000-2001. The request
required IPC and IE to respond in the form of an affidavit to various trading
practices that the FERC identified in its fact-finding investigation of
Potential Manipulation of Electric and Natural Gas Prices in Docket No.
PA02-2-000. IPC and IE filed a response
on May 22, 2002. This response
indicated that although they did export energy from the CalPX outside of
California during the period 2000-2001, they did not engage in any trading
strategy described in the Enron memoranda.
The energy was resold to supply preexisting load obligations, to supply
term transactions or to supply a contemporaneous sales transaction. The companies denied all other ten
activities identified by the FERC. IPC
and IE filed additional responses with the FERC on May 31 and June 5,
2002. In the May 31 response, the
companies denied engaging in the activity referred to as "wash,"
"round trip" or "sell/buyback" trading involving the sale
of an electricity product to another company together with a simultaneous
purchase of the same product at the same price. In the June 5 response, where the data request was directed to all
sellers of natural gas in the Western Systems Coordinating Council and/or Texas
during the years 2000-2001, the companies denied engaging in the activity
referred to as "wash," "round trip" or
"sell/buyback" trading involving the sale of natural gas together
with a simultaneous purchase of the same product at the same price.
IDACORP Energy and Idaho
Power Company Agreement
We entered into an Electricity Supply Management Services Agreement (Agreement)
with IE in June 2001. The IPUC is
currently assessing issues associated with this Agreement. While some of the issues likely became moot
with the decision to wind down IE's trading operation, the IPUC staff has
indicated its desire to continue to review whether adequate compensation has
been provided to our customers as a result of transactions with IE after
February 2001. Similar issues arising
prior to February 2001 were resolved by IPUC Order No. 28852.
Power
supply
We monitor the
effect of streamflow conditions on Brownlee Reservoir, the water source for our
three Hells Canyon hydroelectric facilities and our key water storage
facility. In a typical year, these
three projects combine to produce about half of our generated electricity. Inflows into Brownlee result from a
combination of precipitation, storage and ground water conditions.
The
National Weather Service River Forecast Center has reported that the April-July
2002 inflow into Brownlee Reservoir was 3.24 million acre-feet (maf). Average inflow into the reservoir is 6.3
maf. Inflow into Brownlee Reservoir
impacts our ability to produce low-cost hydropower.
Hydro
generation on our system increased eight percent for the three months ended and
21 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2002, but is still below normal.
We
expect 2002 hydro generation to be improved over last year, but remain below
normal. Below normal conditions
necessitate the use of higher-cost power from coal-fired and natural gas-fired
plants and wholesale purchases.
Integrated Resource Plan
Every two years, we are required to file with the IPUC and OPUC an
Integrated Resource Plan (IRP), a comprehensive look at our present and future
demands for electricity and plans for meeting that demand. The 2002 IRP identified the need for
additional resources to address potential electricity shortfalls within our
utility service territory by mid-2005.
The new resources to be in place at that time were the previously
identified 273-MW power purchase agreement from the Garnet facility, an
additional 100 MW generation resource to be determined, and a 100 MW
transmission upgrade to increase import capability. These resources would all be necessary to satisfy energy demand
during our peak periods. Prior to 2005,
we will continue to use purchases from the Northwest energy markets as
necessary to meet short-term energy needs
As discussed earlier in
"Garnet Power Purchase Agreement," Garnet's ability to finance and
construct its facility is in question, and we are preparing a report for the
IPUC on how it proposes to meet future power requirements if Garnet is not
constructed.
Relicensing of Hydroelectric Projects
We, like
other utilities that operate nonfederal hydroelectric projects, have obtained
licenses for our hydroelectric projects from the FERC. These licenses generally
last for 30 to 50 years depending on the size of the project. By 2010, the
licenses for eight of our hydro projects will have expired. We are actively pursuing the relicensing of
these projects, a process that will continue for the next 10 to 15 years. We
submitted our first applications for license renewal to the FERC in December
1995. We have filed applications seeking renewal of licenses for our Bliss,
Upper Salmon Falls, Lower Salmon Falls, CJ Strike, Shoshone Falls and Upper and
Lower Malad Hydroelectric Projects. The licenses for the Hells Canyon Complex
(Brownlee, Oxbow and Hells Canyon dams) expire in 2005, and the Swan Falls
Project in 2010. We are currently engaged in procedures necessary to file
timely license applications for each of these projects. Although various
federal and state requirements and issues must be resolved through the license
renewal process, we anticipate that we will relicense each of the 10
facilities. At this point, however, we cannot predict what type of
environmental or operational requirements we may face, nor can we estimate the
cost of license renewal. At June 30, 2002, $45 million of relicensing costs
were included in Construction Work in Progress.
The
most significant relicensing effort is the Hells Canyon Complex, which provides
68 percent of our hydro generation capacity and 41 percent of our total
generating capacity. Presently, we are
developing our draft license application with the assistance of a collaborative
team made up of individuals representing state and federal agencies,
businesses, environmental, tribal, customer, local government and local
landowner interests. We expect to file
the draft license application in September 2002, with the final application
following in July 2003.
FERC
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
In July 2002 the FERC
issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) on Standard Market Design. We are currently reviewing the NOPR, but at
this time it is too early to assess what impact the NOPR, if implemented, would
have on our operations.
Board of Directors:
Roger L. Breezley has resigned from the Board of Directors effective
June 30, 2002 for health reasons. Mr.
Breezley has served as a Director of IPC since 1993 and IDACORP since 1998.
New Accounting
Pronouncements
In August
2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 143, "Accounting for Asset
Retirement Obligations," which is effective for fiscal years beginning
after June 15, 2002. This Statement
addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with
the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset
retirement costs. An obligation may
result from the acquisition, construction, development and the normal operation
of a long-lived asset. We are currently
assessing but have not yet determined the impact of SFAS 143 on our financial
statements.
In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS 146,
"Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal
Activities." The standard requires
companies to recognize costs associated with exit or disposal activities when
they are incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to an exit or
disposal plan. Examples of costs
covered by the standard include lease termination costs and certain employee
severance costs that are associated with a restructuring, discontinued
operation, plant closing or other exit or disposal activity. This standard supersedes Emerging Issues
Task Force Issue No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee
Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain
Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)."
SFAS 146 is to be applied prospectively to exit or disposal activities
initiated after December 31, 2002. We
are currently assessing but have not yet determined the impact of SFAS 146 on
our financial statements.
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our market risks related to commodity prices and interest rates have not changed materially from those reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.
Item
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
(a) Regular annual meeting of Idaho Power Company's stockholders,
held May 16, 2002 in Boise, Idaho.
(b) Directors elected at the meeting for a three-year term:
Roger L. Breezley |
Jack K. Lemley |
John B. Carley |
Evelyn Loveless |
Continuing Directors
Rotchford L. Barker |
Peter S. O'Neill |
Christopher L.Culp |
Jan B. Packwood |
Gary G. Michael |
Robert A. Tintsman |
Jon H. Miller |
|
(c)1) To elect four Director Nominees:
|
Common |
|
4% Preferred |
|
7.68% Preferred |
|||
Name |
For |
Withheld |
|
For |
Withheld |
|
For |
Withheld |
Roger L. Breezley |
37,612,351 |
- |
|
1,785,740 |
120,540 |
|
94,433 |
465 |
John B. Carley |
37,612,351 |
- |
|
1,785,740 |
120,540 |
|
94,433 |
465 |
Jack K. Lemley |
37,612,351 |
- |
|
1,816,360 |
89,920 |
|
94,433 |
465 |
Evelyn Loveless |
37,612,351 |
- |
|
1,785,740 |
120,540 |
|
94,433 |
465 |
2) To ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent auditors for the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2002.
Class of Stock |
For |
Against |
Abstain |
Total Voted |
Common |
37,612,351 |
- |
- |
37,612,351 |
4% Preferred |
1,834,800 |
51,040 |
20,440 |
1,906,280 |
7.68% Preferred |
93,623 |
1,050 |
225 |
94,898 |
Total |
39,540,774 |
52,090 |
20,665 |
39,613,529 |
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits:
Exhibit |
File Number |
As Exhibit |
|
|
*2 |
333-48031 |
2 |
Agreement and Plan of Exchange between IDACORP, Inc., and IPC dated as of February 2, 1998. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*3(a) |
33-00440 |
4(a)(xiii) |
Restated Articles of Incorporation of IPC as filed with the Secretary of State of Idaho on June 30, 1989. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*3(a)(i) |
33-65720 |
4(a)(ii) |
Statement of Resolution Establishing Terms of Flexible Auction Series A, Serial Preferred Stock, Without Par Value (cumulative stated value of $100,000 per share) of IPC, as filed with the Secretary of State of Idaho on November 5, 1991. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*3(a)(ii) |
33-65720 |
4(a)(iii) |
Statement of Resolution Establishing Terms of 7.07% Serial Preferred Stock, Without Par Value (cumulative stated value of $100 per share) of IPC, as filed with the Secretary of State of Idaho on June 30, 1993. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*3(a)(iii) |
1-3198 |
3(a)(iii) |
Articles of Amendment to Restated Articles of Incorporation of IPC as filed with the Secretary of State of Idaho on June 15, 2000. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*3(b) |
1-3198 |
3(c) |
By-laws of IPC amended on September 9, 1999, and presently in effect. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*3(c) |
33-56071 |
3(d) |
Articles of Share Exchange, as filed with the Secretary of State of Idaho on September 29, 1998. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*4(a)(i) |
2-3413 |
B-2 |
Mortgage and Deed of Trust, dated as of October 1, 1937, between IPC and Bankers Trust Company (now Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas) and R. G. Page, as Trustees. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*4(a)(ii) |
|
|
IPC Supplemental Indentures to Mortgage and Deed of Trust: |
|
|
|
|
Number |
Dated |
|
1-MD |
B-2-a |
First |
July 1, 1939 |
|
2-5395 |
7-a-3 |
Second |
November 15, 1943 |
|
2-7237 |
7-a-4 |
Third |
February 1, 1947 |
|
2-7502 |
7-a-5 |
Fourth |
May 1, 1948 |
|
2-8398 |
7-a-6 |
Fifth |
November 1, 1949 |
|
2-8973 |
7-a-7 |
Sixth |
October 1, 1951 |
|
2-12941 |
2-C-8 |
Seventh |
January 1, 1957 |
|
2-13688 |
4-J |
Eighth |
July 15, 1957 |
|
2-13689 |
4-K |
Ninth |
November 15, 1957 |
|
2-14245 |
4-L |
Tenth |
April 1, 1958 |
|
2-14366 |
2-L |
Eleventh |
October 15, 1958 |
|
2-14935 |
4-N |
Twelfth |
May 15, 1959 |
|
2-18976 |
4-O |
Thirteenth |
November 15, 1960 |
|
2-18977 |
4-Q |
Fourteenth |
November 1, 1961 |
|
2-22988 |
4-B-16 |
Fifteenth |
September 15, 1964 |
|
2-24578 |
4-B-17 |
Sixteenth |
April 1, 1966 |
|
2-25479 |
4-B-18 |
Seventeenth |
October 1, 1966 |
|
2-45260 |
2(c) |
Eighteenth |
September 1, 1972 |
|
2-49854 |
2(c) |
Nineteenth |
January 15, 1974 |
|
2-51722 |
2(c)(i) |
Twentieth |
August 1, 1974 |
|
2-51722 |
2(c)(ii) |
Twenty-first |
October 15, 1974 |
|
2-57374 |
2(c) |
Twenty-second |
November 15, 1976 |
|
2-62035 |
2(c) |
Twenty-third |
August 15, 1978 |
|
33-34222 |
4(d)(iii) |
Twenty-fourth |
September 1, 1979 |
|
33-34222 |
4(d)(iv) |
Twenty-fifth |
November 1, 1981 |
|
33-34222 |
4(d)(v) |
Twenty-sixth |
May 1, 1982 |
|
33-34222 |
4(d)(vi) |
Twenty-seventh |
May 1, 1986 |
|
33-00440 |
4(c)(iv) |
Twenty-eighth |
June 30, 1989 |
|
33-34222 |
4(d)(vii) |
Twenty-ninth |
January 1, 1990 |
|
33-65720 |
4(d)(iii) |
Thirtieth |
January 1, 1991 |
|
33-65720 |
4(d)(iv) |
Thirty-first |
August 15, 1991 |
|
33-65720 |
4(d)(v) |
Thirty-second |
March 15, 1992 |
|
33-65720 |
4(d)(vi) |
Thirty-third |
April 1, 1993 |
|
1-3198 |
4 |
Thirty-fourth |
December 1, 1993 |
|
1-3198 |
4 |
Thirty-fifth |
November 1, 2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-3198 |
4(a) |
Thirty-sixth |
October 1, 2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
4(b) |
|
|
Indenture for Debt Securities dated as of August 1, 2001 between Idaho Power Company and Bank One Trust Company N.A. as trustee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4(c) |
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of September 1, 2001 to Indenture for Debt Securities dated as of August 1, 2001 between Idaho Power Company and Bank One Trust Company N.A. as trustee. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*4(d) |
1-3198 |
4(b) |
Instruments relating to IPC American Falls bond guarantee. (see Exhibit 10(c)). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*4(e) |
33-65720 |
4(f) |
Agreement of IPC to furnish certain debt instruments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*4(f) |
33-00440 |
2(a)(iii) |
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated March 10, 1989, between Idaho Power Company, a Maine Corporation, and Idaho Power Migrating Corporation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10(a) |
2-49584 |
5(b) |
Agreements, dated September 22, 1969, between IPC and Pacific Power & Light Company relating to the operation, construction and ownership of the Jim Bridger Project. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10(a)(i) |
2-51762 |
5(c) |
Amendment, dated February 1, 1974, relating to operation agreement filed as Exhibit 10(a). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10(b) |
2-49584 |
5(c) |
Agreement, dated as of October 11, 1973, between IPC and Pacific Power & Light Company. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10(c) |
1-3198 |
10(c) |
Guaranty Agreement, dated April 11, 2000, between IPC and Bank One Trust Company N.A., as Trustee, relating to $19,885,000 American Falls Replacement Dam Refinancing Bonds of the American Falls Reservoir District, Idaho. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10(d) |
2-62034 |
5(r) |
Guaranty Agreement, dated as of August 30, 1974, between IPC and Pacific Power & Light Company. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10(e) |
2-56513 |
5(i) |
Letter Agreement, dated January 23, 1976, between IPC and Portland General Electric Company. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10(e)(i) |
2-62034 |
5(s) |
Agreement for Construction, Ownership and Operation of the Number One Boardman Station on Carty Reservoir, dated as of October 15, 1976, between Portland General Electric Company and IPC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10(e)(ii) |
2-62034 |
5(t) |
Amendment, dated September 30, 1977, relating to agreement filed as Exhibit 10(e). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10(e)(iii) |
2-62034 |
5(u) |
Amendment, dated October 31, 1977, relating to agreement filed as Exhibit 10(e). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10(e)(iv) |
2-62034 |
5(v) |
Amendment, dated January 23, 1978, relating to agreement filed as Exhibit 10(e). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10(e)(v) |
2-62034 |
5(w) |
Amendment, dated February 15, 1978, relating to agreement filed as Exhibit 10(e). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10(e)(vi) |
2-68574 |
5(x) |
Amendment, dated September 1, 1979, relating to agreement filed as Exhibit 10(e). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10(f) |
2-68574 |
5(z) |
Participation Agreement, dated September 1, 1979, relating to the sale and leaseback of coal handling facilities at the Number One Boardman Station on Carty Reservoir. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10(g) |
2-64910 |
5(y) |
Agreements for the Operation, Construction and Ownership of the North Valmy Power Plant Project, dated December 12, 1978, between Sierra Pacific Power Company and IPC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-3198 |
10(n)(i) |
The Revised Security Plan for Senior Management Employees - a non-qualified, deferred compensation plan effective August 1, 1996. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
*10(h)(ii) 1 |
1-3198 |
10(n)(ii) |
The Executive Annual Incentive Plan for senior management employees of IPC effective January 1, 2001. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10(h)(iii) 1 |
1-3198 |
10(n)(iii) |
The 1994 Restricted Stock Plan for officers and key executives of IDACORP, Inc. and IPC effective July 1, 1994. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10(h)(iv) 1 |
1-3198 |
10(h)(iv) |
The Revised Security Plan for Board of Directors - a non-qualified, deferred compensation plan effective August 1, 1996, revised March 2, 1999, as amended. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10(h) (v) 1 |
1-3198 |
10(h)(v) |
IDACORP, Inc. Non-Employee Directors Stock Compensation Plan as of May 17, 1999, as amended. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10(h)(vi) |
1-3198 |
10(y) |
Executive Employment Agreement dated November 20, 1996 between IPC and Richard Riazzi. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10(h)(vii) |
1-3198 |
10(g) |
Executive Employment Agreement dated April 12, 1999 between IPC and Marlene Williams. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10(h)(viii) |
1-14465 |
10(h) |
Agreement between IDACORP, Inc. and Jan B. Packwood, J. LaMont Keen, James C. Miller, Richard Riazzi, Darrel T. Anderson, Bryan Kearney, Cliff N. Olson, Robert W. Stahman and Marlene K. Williams. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10(h)(ix) 1 |
1-3198 |
10(h)(ix) |
IDACORP, Inc. 2000 Long-Term Incentive and Compensation Plan, as amended. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10(i) |
33-65720 |
10(h) |
Framework Agreement, dated October 1, 1984, between the State of Idaho and IPC relating to IPC's Swan Falls and Snake River water rights. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10(i)(i) |
33-65720 |
10(h)(i) |
Agreement, dated October 25, 1984, between the State of Idaho and IPC relating to the agreement filed as Exhibit 10(i). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10(i)(ii) |
33-65720 |
10(h)(ii) |
Contract to Implement, dated October 25, 1984, between the State of Idaho and IPC relating to the agreement filed as Exhibit 10(i). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10(j) |
33-65720 |
10(m) |
Agreement Regarding the Ownership, Construction, Operation and Maintenance of the Milner Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 2899), dated January 22, 1990, between IPC and the Twin Falls Canal Company and the Northside Canal Company Limited. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10(j)(i) |
33-65720 |
10(m)(i) |
Guaranty Agreement, dated February 10, 1992, between IPC and New York Life Insurance Company, as Note Purchaser, relating to $11,700,000 Guaranteed Notes due 2017 of Milner Dam Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
Statement Re: Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12(a) |
|
|
Statement Re: Computation of Supplemental Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12(b) |
|
|
Statement Re: Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividend Requirements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12(c) |
|
|
Statement Re: Computation of Supplemental Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividend Requirements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
Letter Re: Unaudited Interim Financial Information. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*21 |
1-3198 |
21 |
Subsidiary of IPC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
99(a) |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
99(b) |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
Reports on Form
8-K. The following reports on Form 8-K
were filed for the three months ended June 30, 2002.
Items Reported |
|
Date of Report |
|
|
|
Item 5 - Other Events |
|
April 25, 2002 |
Item 5 - Other Events |
|
May 16, 2002 |
Item 5 - Other Events |
|
May 31, 2002 |
|
|
|
* Previously filed
and incorporated herein by reference.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to
the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
|
IDAHO POWER COMPANY |
|||
(Registrant) |
||||
|
||||
Date |
August 13, 2002 |
By: |
/s/ |
J LaMont Keen |
|
J. LaMont Keen |
|||
|
President and Chief |
|||
|
Operating Officer |
|||
|
||||
Date |
August 13, 2002 |
By: |
/s/ |
Darrel T Anderson |
|
Darrel T. Anderson |
|||
|
Vice President, Chief Financial |
|||
|
Officer and Treasurer |
|||
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|||
|
(Principal Accounting Officer) |