UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Mark One
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For Quarter Ended September 7, 2002
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _____ to _____
Commission File Number 1-4141
THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
Maryland 13-1890974
- --------------------------------- ---------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
2 Paragon Drive
Montvale, New Jersey 07645
--------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices)
(201) 573-9700
Registrant's telephone number, including area code
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
YES [X] NO [ ]
As of September 9, 2002 the Registrant had a total of 38,515,806 shares of
common stock - $1 par value outstanding.
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1 - Financial Statements
The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.
Statements of Consolidated Operations
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
12 Weeks Ended 28 Weeks Ended
-------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
Sept. 8, 2001 Sept. 8, 2001
(As Restated (As Restated
Sept. 7, 2002 See Note 2) Sept. 7, 2002 See Note 2)
------------------ ------------------ ------------------ -----------------
Sales $ 2,500,478 $ 2,547,590 $ 5,807,716 $ 5,935,884
Cost of merchandise sold (1,790,907) (1,810,214) (4,150,590) (4,228,074)
------------ -------------- -------------- -------------
Gross margin 709,571 737,376 1,657,126 1,707,810
Store operating, general and
administrative expense (712,736) (721,100) (1,632,520) (1,661,909)
------------ -------------- --------------- -------------
(Loss) income from operations (3,165) 16,276 24,606 45,901
Interest expense (19,640) (20,969) (46,392) (51,474)
Interest income 3,105 1,892 5,064 3,734
------------ -------------- -------------- -------------
Loss before income taxes and
extraordinary item (19,700) (2,801) (16,722) (1,839)
(Provision for) benefit from income taxes (124,984) 1,058 (125,403) (873)
------------ -------------- -------------- -------------
Loss before extraordinary item (144,684) (1,743) (142,125) (2,712)
Extraordinary loss on early
extinguishment of debt - - (684) -
------------ -------------- -------------- -------------
Net loss $ (144,684) $ (1,743) $ (142,809) $ (2,712)
============ ============== ============== =============
Net loss per share - basic and diluted:
Loss before extraordinary item $ (3.76) $ (0.05) $ (3.69) $ (0.07)
Extraordinary loss on early extinguishment
of debt - - (0.02) -
------------ --------------- ------------- -------------
Net loss per share - basic and diluted $ (3.76) $ (0.05) $ (3.71) $ (0.07)
============ ============== ============== =============
Weighted average number of
common shares outstanding 38,512,439 38,347,216 38,476,818 38,347,216
Common stock equivalents 422,850 622,265 776,986 380,960
------------- -------------- -------------- -------------
Weighted average number of common and
common equivalent shares outstanding 38,935,289 38,969,481 39,253,804 38,728,176
============= ============== ============== =============
See Notes to Quarterly Report
The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.
Statements of Consolidated Stockholders' Equity and
Comprehensive Income (Dollars in thousands, except
share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Accumulated
Common Stock Additional Other Total
----------------------------- Paid-in Retained Comprehensive Stockholders'
Shares Amount Capital Earnings (Loss)/Income Equity
-------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ----------------- ---------------
28 Week Period Ended
September 7, 2002
- -----------------
Balance at beginning of period 38,367,628 $ 38,368 $ 456,753 $ 254,896 $ (77,029) $ 672,988
Net loss (142,809) (142,809)
Other comprehensive income 4,138 4,138
Stock options exercised 148,178 148 2,658 2,806
------------ ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Balance at end of period 38,515,806 $ 38,516 $ 459,411 $ 112,087 $ (72,891) $ 537,123
============ =========== =========== =========== =========== ============
28 Week Period Ended
September 8, 2001
As Restated - See Note 2
- ------------------------
Balance at beginning of period 38,347,216 $ 38,347 $ 456,470 $ 326,802 $ (72,808) $ 748,811
Net loss (2,712) (2,712)
Other comprehensive loss (274) (274)
------------ ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Balance at end of period 38,347,216 $ 38,347 $ 456,470 $ 324,090 $ (73,082) $ 745,825
============ =========== =========== =========== ============ ============
Comprehensive Income
- --------------------
12 Weeks Ended 28 Weeks Ended
-------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
(As Restated (As Restated
See Note 2) See Note 2)
Sept. 7, 2002 Sept. 8, 2001 Sept. 7, 2002 Sept. 8, 2001
------------------ ------------------ ------------------ -----------------
Net loss $ (144,684) $ (1,743) $ (142,809) $ (2,712)
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------
Reclassification adjustment for gains
included in net loss - - (933) -
Unrealized loss on commodity contract (152) - (152) -
Foreign currency translation adjustment (2,475) (6,702) 5,223 (274)
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------
Other comprehensive (loss) income (2,627) (6,702) 4,138 (274)
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------
Total comprehensive loss $ (147,311) $ (8,445) $ (138,671) $ (2,986)
=========== =========== =========== ==========
See Notes to Quarterly Report
The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in thousands except share amounts)
(Unaudited)
September 7, February 23,
2002 2002
-------------------- --------------------
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 146,111 $ 168,620
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts
of $8,019 and $8,274 at September 7, 2002 and
February 23, 2002, respectively 205,325 206,188
Inventories 710,289 716,083
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 39,329 121,183
------------- --------------
Total current assets 1,101,054 1,212,074
------------- --------------
Non-current assets:
Property:
Property owned 1,612,789 1,627,722
Property leased under capital leases 81,000 76,800
------------- --------------
Property - net 1,693,789 1,704,522
Other assets 191,317 273,850
------------- --------------
Total assets $ 2,986,160 $ 3,190,446
============= ==============
LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt $ 31,534 $ 526
Current portion of obligations under capital leases 12,132 10,691
Accounts payable 526,686 547,113
Book overdrafts 130,223 127,079
Accrued salaries, wages and benefits 166,983 167,724
Accrued taxes 71,754 69,559
Other accruals 242,984 261,771
------------- --------------
Total current liabilities 1,182,296 1,184,463
------------- --------------
Non-current liabilities:
Long-term debt 751,068 779,440
Long-term obligations under capital leases 95,394 93,587
Other non-current liabilities 420,279 459,968
------------- --------------
Total liabilities 2,449,037 2,517,458
------------- --------------
Commitments and contingencies Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock--no par value; authorized - 3,000,000
shares; issued - none - -
Common stock--$1 par value; authorized - 80,000,000
shares; issued and outstanding - 38,515,806 and 38,367,628
shares at September 7, 2002 and February 23, 2002, respectively 38,516 38,368
Additional paid-in capital 459,411 456,753
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (72,891) (77,029)
Retained earnings 112,087 254,896
------------- --------------
Total stockholders' equity 537,123 672,988
------------- --------------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 2,986,160 $ 3,190,446
============= ==============
See Notes to Quarterly Report
The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.
Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows
(Dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)
28 Weeks Ended
-------------------------------------------------
Sept. 8, 2001
(As Restated
Sept. 7, 2002 See Note 2)
---------------------- ----------------------
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss $ (142,809) $ (2,712)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash provided
by operating activities:
Asset disposition initiative 8,266 -
Depreciation and amortization 138,750 143,256
Deferred income tax provision (benefit) 146,709 (1,071)
(Gain) loss on disposal of owned property (3,809) 9,015
Other changes in assets and liabilities:
Decrease (increase) in receivables 26,138 (2,158)
Decrease in inventories 7,720 43,443
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses and other current assets 22,408 (15,171)
Decrease in other assets 7,073 12,112
Decrease in accounts payable (32,741) (25,337)
(Decrease) increase in accrued salaries, wages and benefits (1,513) 8,260
(Decrease) increase in accrued taxes (21,285) 7,123
(Decrease) increase in other accruals (19,151) 21,024
Decrease in other non-current liabilities (54,865) (23,883)
Other operating activities, net 356 (4,154)
----------- -----------
Net cash provided by operating activities 81,247 169,747
----------- -----------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Expenditures for property (134,019) (123,481)
Gain on sale of securities (1,717) -
Proceeds from disposal of property 42,933 73,963
----------- -----------
Net cash used in investing activities (92,803) (49,518)
----------- -----------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Changes in short-term debt 30,000 (5,000)
Proceeds under revolving lines of credit 28,253 827,506
Payments on revolving lines of credit (28,253) (917,594)
Proceeds from long-term borrowings 77 852
Payments on long-term borrowings (37,576) (22,362)
Principal payments on capital leases (7,239) (6,338)
Increase in book overdrafts 3,038 36,937
Deferred financing fees (2,522) (5,485)
Proceeds from exercises of stock options 2,806 -
----------- -----------
Net cash used in financing activities (11,416) (91,484)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents 463 (609)
----------- -----------
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents (22,509) 28,136
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 168,620 131,550
----------- -----------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 146,111 $ 159,686
=========== ===========
See Notes to Quarterly Report
The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of The Great Atlantic &
Pacific Tea Company, Inc. (the "Company") for the 12 and 28 weeks ended
September 7, 2002 and September 8, 2001 are unaudited and, in the opinion of
management, contain all adjustments that are of a normal and recurring nature
necessary to present fairly the financial position and results of operations for
such periods. The consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes
contained in the Company's 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Interim results are
not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. Certain reclassifications
have been made to prior year amounts to conform to current year presentation.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and
all majority-owned subsidiaries.
2. Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements
Prior to filing its 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company discovered
certain irregularities relating to the timing for the recognition of vendor
allowances and the accounting for certain inventory. As the Company announced on
May 24, 2002, it promptly commenced a review of these issues. This review caused
the Company to delay filing its Annual Report on Form 10-K. As a result of the
accounting errors discovered during this review, the Company restated its
financial statements for fiscal 1999 and fiscal 2000, and supplementary
unaudited financial information for the first, second and third quarters of
fiscal 2001. In addition, the Company restated its financial statements to
correct other accounting errors for 1) the timing of the recognition of certain
other vendor allowances which were not accounted for in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), 2) the use of a method of
estimating self-insurance reserves which did not comply with GAAP, and 3) the
recognition of sublet income associated with certain closed stores, which did
not comply with GAAP. The summary of the effects of restatement are presented in
the tables below entitled "Overall Impact of the Restatement".
Overall Impact of the Restatement
- ---------------------------------
The following schedules show the effects of the restatement on previously
reported earnings for the 12 and 28 weeks ended September 8, 2001. The
restatement had the aggregate effect of decreasing retained earnings by $75
million as of February 27, 1999. This amount had previously been reported as net
income in years prior to fiscal 1999 using accounting methods that did not
conform with GAAP. In general, the Company's prior methodologies understated its
reported earnings for the 12 and 28 weeks ended September 8, 2001. This resulted
from errors in accounting from reduced recognition of vendor allowance credits
and increased recognition of self-insurance claims expense in order to reduce
the balance sheet underaccruals for these matters. The Company restated its
financial statements to properly present its results of operations and financial
condition in accordance with GAAP.
Before Tax (a) Earnings Increase (Decrease)
- -------------- ------------------------------------------------
12 Weeks Ended 28 Weeks Ended
September 8, 2001 September 8, 2001
--------------------- ----------------------
(Dollars in millions)
Vendor allowances:
Irregularities $ (5,436) $ (4,312)
Non-GAAP policy 4,612 13,136
Perishable inventory irregularity (297) (533)
Self-insurance reserves 3,923 5,754
Closed store subleases (236) (842)
----------- -----------
Pre-tax impact of restatement 2,566 13,203
Provision for income taxes (1,078) (5,546)
----------- -----------
Total impact of restatement $ 1,488 $ 7,657
=========== ===========
(a) Changes to vendor allowances and perishable inventory irregularities impact
the cost of merchandise sold line on the Statements of Consolidated
Operations. Changes to closed store subleases impact the selling, general
and administrative expense line on the Statements of Consolidated
Operations. Changes to self-insurance reserves impact both the selling,
general and administrative expense and interest expense lines on the
Statements of Consolidated Operations as follows:
Earnings Increase (Decrease)
------------------------------------------------
12 Weeks Ended 28 Weeks Ended
September 8, 2001 September 8, 2001
--------------------- ----------------------
Selling, general and administrative expense $ 5,008 $ 8,285
Interest expense (1,085) (2,531)
----------- -----------
$ 3,923 $ 5,754
=========== ===========
Effect on Net Income Earnings Increase (Decrease)
- -------------------- ------------------------------------------------
12 Weeks Ended 28 Weeks Ended
September 8, 2001 September 8, 2001
--------------------- ----------------------
(Dollars in millions)
Vendor allowances:
Irregularities $ (3,153) $ (2,501)
Non-GAAP policy 2,675 7,619
Perishable inventory irregularity (172) (309)
Self-insurance reserves 2,275 3,338
Closed store subleases (137) (490)
----------- -----------
Total impact of restatement $ 1,488 $ 7,657
=========== ===========
Irregularities
- --------------
As referred to above, the Company discovered certain irregularities with respect
to accounting for vendor allowances and perishable inventory. The resultant
review identified that certain employees circumvented the Company's system of
internal controls resulting in accounting errors. With respect to vendor
allowances, those errors caused valid allowances generally to be recognized
before they were earned. With respect to perishable inventories, the
irregularities related to overstatement of inventory due to inappropriate
adjustments made to physical counts, causing errors in the periods presented in
the tables above. The Company modified certain procedures and is in the process
of implementing additional procedural changes designed to prevent such
irregularities in the future.
Vendor Allowances
- -----------------
Prior to fiscal 1997, the Company recognized vendor allowances for certain
one-year and multi-year allowance contracts as cash was received since the
Company believed that such amounts received were non-refundable and that no
future performance was required. In fiscal 1997, the Company implemented a new
accounting policy whereby the amount of allowances recognized was limited to the
amount of such allowances recognized in the prior year. Allowances in excess of
such limit were deferred and were not amortized. Neither policy was in
conformity with GAAP. The Company's methods resulted in the overstatement of its
reported earnings in the aggregate prior to fiscal 1997. Furthermore, the policy
implemented in fiscal 1997 had the effect of reducing its reported earnings in
subsequent periods as the Company limited its recognition of these allowances in
order to increase its accrual for unearned allowances. Also, the volume of these
transactions has been decreasing in recent years, further causing the allowances
recognized in recent years to be less than they would have been if these
contracts had previously been deferred and recognized over their term in
accordance with GAAP. See "Overall Impact of the Restatement" above for the
amount of such restatement.
Self-Insurance Reserves
- -----------------------
The Company's business results in significant risks that the Company
self-insures. These risks relate primarily to customer and employee accidents.
The Company estimates and records the present value of the expected self-insured
portion of the cost of such accidents and related liability matters as
self-insurance reserves. The Company's previous method of establishing its
self-insurance reserves was not appropriate because it did not adequately
consider its historical loss experience resulting from the frequency (number of
incidents) and severity (ultimate cost) of claims. It also improperly included
adjustments to reduce the reserve in anticipation of future improvement in
expected loss experience resulting from planned risk management changes intended
to reduce the frequency and severity of future claims. This method was not in
conformity with GAAP. Accordingly, the Company restated its financial statements
to correct this accounting error by reflecting its self-insurance reserves on
the basis of actuarially determined estimates. The Company's prior method
resulted in overstatement of its reported earnings in the aggregate prior to
fiscal 1997. In recent years, the Company had generally reduced its reported
earnings as it accrued these costs at rates in excess of its actual development
of the underlying claims. The reserve is impacted by and was determined as of
each report date based upon the Company's information regarding frequency and
severity, among other factors, which was available at each report date. The
Company's frequency decreased approximately 10% from fiscal 1999 through fiscal
2001; severity was relatively unchanged during this period. These reserves
represent the present value of the estimated self-insured portion of claims,
including claims incurred but not reported. Such claims generally are expected
to be paid within five years, although payments on some employee accident claims
extend beyond this period. See "Overall Impact of the Restatement" above for the
amount of such restatement.
Closed Store Subleases
- ----------------------
In the normal course of business, the Company closes stores periodically. For
stores closed that are under long-term leases, the Company records a liability
for the future minimum lease payments and related costs, such as utilities and
taxes, from the date of closure to the end of the remaining lease term, net of
estimated probable cost recoveries from sublease rentals. In some cases, the
Company subleases the stores for amounts in excess of its own related costs
under its lease. Under the Company's prior accounting method, such excess of
sublease amounts was recorded as an offset to the cost of closure of other
locations. Such a methodology was not in conformity with GAAP. Accordingly, the
Company restated its financial statements to correct this accounting error by
recognizing those sublease excesses ratably as income over the term of the
sublease. The Company's prior accounting method had the effect of overstating
reported earnings in the period in which a sublease was entered into by the
amount that total sublease rental exceeded the lease obligations, and decreasing
reported earnings in the subsequent periods in which the excess should have been
recognized. See "Overall Impact of the Restatement" above for the amount of such
restatements. The Company's prior methodology had no effect on stores closed as
part of the Asset Disposition Initiative discussed in Note 6 of the Company's
Consolidated Financial Statements.
The following is a summary of the significant effects of the restatement on the
Company's Statements of Consolidated Operations for the 12 and 28 weeks ended
September 8, 2001:
12 Weeks Ended September 8, 2001
-----------------------------------------------------------
(Dollars in thousands) As Previously
Reported Adjustments As Restated
------------------ ------------------ -----------------
Statement of Consolidated Operations
- ------------------------------------
Cost of merchandise sold $ (1,809,093) $ (1,121) $ (1,810,214)
Gross margin 738,497 (1,121) 737,376
Store operating, general and administrative expense (725,872) 4,772 (721,100)
Income from operations 12,625 3,651 16,276
Interest expense (19,884) (1,085) (20,969)
(Loss) income before income taxes (5,367) 2,566 (2,801)
Benefit from (provision for) income taxes 2,136 (1,078) 1,058
Net (loss) income (3,231) 1,488 (1,743)
Net (loss) income - basic and diluted $ (0.08) $ 0.03 $ (0.05)
28 Weeks Ended September 8, 2001
-----------------------------------------------------------
As Previously
Reported Adjustments As Restated
------------------ ------------------ -----------------
Statement of Consolidated Operations
- ------------------------------------
Cost of merchandise sold $ (4,236,365) $ 8,291 $ (4,228,074)
Gross margin 1,699,519 8,291 1,707,810
Store operating, general and administrative expense (1,669,352) 7,443 (1,661,909)
Income from operations 30,167 15,734 45,901
Interest expense (48,944) (2,530) (51,474)
(Loss) income before income taxes (15,043) 13,204 (1,839)
Benefit from (provision for) income taxes 4,673 (5,546) (873)
Net (loss) income (10,370) 7,658 (2,712)
Net (loss) income - basic and diluted $ (0.27) $ 0.20 $ (0.07)
3. Income Taxes
The income tax provision recorded for the 28 weeks ended September 7, 2002 and
September 8, 2001 reflects the Company's estimated expected annual tax rates
applied to its respective domestic and foreign financial results.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 109 "Accounting for
Income Taxes" ("SFAS 109") requires that a valuation allowance be created and
offset against the net deferred tax asset if, based on existing facts and
circumstances, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the net
deferred tax asset will not be realized. Based upon the Company's continued
assessment of the realization of its U.S. net deferred tax asset and its
historic cumulative losses, and in particular, the significant increase in U.S.
operating losses during the second quarter of fiscal 2002, the Company
concluded that it was appropriate to establish a full valuation allowance for
its U.S. net deferred tax asset in the amount of approximately $134 million for
the 12 and 28 weeks ended September 7, 2002. In future periods, U.S. earnings or
losses will not be tax effected until such time as the certainty of future tax
benefits can be reasonably assured.
The Company had a net current deferred tax asset related to its Canadian
operations which was included in prepaid expenses and other current assets on
its Consolidated Balance Sheet amounting to $1.8 million and a net non-current
deferred tax asset related to its Canadian operations which was included in
other assets on its Consolidated Balance Sheet amounting to $4.6 million at
September 7, 2002.
The income tax provision recorded for the 28 weeks ended September 8, 2001
reflects a one-time adjustment relating to an enacted federal tax rate reduction
from the Canadian government. This new legislation which became effective during
the first quarter of fiscal 2001 will reduce the Canadian federal corporate
income tax rate by a total of 7% from 28% to 21% by January 1, 2004. However,
income tax expense for the 28 weeks ended September 8, 2001 was increased by
$1.2 million to reflect the reduction in value of the deferred Canadian tax
asset (primarily relating to net operating loss carryforwards) resulting from
the lower rates. Excluding this adjustment of the deferred tax asset, the
Company would have had an income tax benefit of $0.3 million.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2001, the Ontario government enacted
corporate income tax rate changes, gradually reducing the rate from 14% to 8% by
January 1, 2006. This additional Canadian tax rate reduction did not have a
significant impact on the financial statements for the 12 and 28 weeks ended
September 7, 2002 or September 8, 2001.
4. Wholesale Franchise Business
As of September 7, 2002, the Company served 66 franchised stores. These
franchisees are required to purchase inventory exclusively from the Company,
which acts as a wholesaler to the franchisees. The Company had sales to these
franchised stores of $160 million and $154 million for the second quarters of
fiscal 2002 and 2001, respectively, and $381 million and $362 million for the
first 28 weeks of fiscal 2002 and 2001, respectively. In addition, the Company
subleases the stores and leases the equipment in the stores to the franchisees.
The Company also provides merchandising, advertising, accounting and other
consultative services to the franchisees for which it receives a fee, which
primarily represents the reimbursement of costs incurred to provide such
services.
The Company holds as assets inventory notes collateralized by the inventory in
the stores and equipment lease receivables collateralized by the equipment in
the stores. The current portion of the inventory notes and equipment leases, net
of an allowance for doubtful accounts, amounting to approximately $5.0 million
and $2.8 million, are included in accounts receivable at September 7, 2002 and
February 23, 2002, respectively. The long-term portion of the inventory notes
and equipment leases amounting to approximately $40.9 and $44.8 million are
included in other assets at September 7, 2002 and February 23, 2002,
respectively.
The repayment of the inventory notes and equipment leases are dependent upon
positive operating results of the stores. To the extent that the franchisees
incur operating losses, the Company establishes an allowance for doubtful
accounts. The Company continually assesses the sufficiency of the allowance on a
store by store basis based upon the operating results and the related collateral
underlying the amounts due from the franchisees. In the event of default by a
franchisee, the Company reserves the option to reacquire the inventory and
equipment at the store and operate the franchise as a corporate owned store.
5. Impact of New Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS 142,
"Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets". The provisions of this statement were
required to be applied by the Company starting in fiscal 2002. This statement
applied to all goodwill and other intangible assets recognized in the Company's
financial statements at the date of adoption. At that time, goodwill was no
longer required to be amortized, but will be tested for impairment annually. Had
goodwill continued to be amortized, the Company would have recorded $0.3 million
and $0.8 million, respectively, in amortization expense during the 12 and 28
weeks ended September 7, 2002. Amortization expense for the 12 and 28 weeks
ended September 8, 2001 was $0.3 million and $0.8 million, respectively.
Additionally, impairment losses for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible
assets that arise due to the initial application of this statement would be
reported as resulting from a change in accounting principle. The Company has
completed its initial testing for impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived
intangible assets and has determined that no impairment existed at the end of
the second quarter of fiscal 2002.
In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS 143, "Accounting For Asset Retirement
Obligations". This statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for
obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the
associated asset retirement costs. The Company is required to adopt the
provisions of SFAS No. 143 at the beginning of fiscal 2003. The Company has
determined that the adoption of this statement will not have a material impact
on its financial position or results of operations.
In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets". This statement requires that one accounting
model be used for long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale, whether
previously held and used or newly acquired. This statement also broadens the
presentation of discontinued operations to include more disposal transactions.
The provisions of this statement were required to be adopted by the Company at
the beginning of fiscal 2002. The Company has determined that no impairment
occurred during the 12 and 28 weeks ended September 7, 2002.
In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS 145, "Rescission of FASB Statements 4, 44
and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement 13, and Technical Corrections". SFAS 145
rescinds the provisions of SFAS 4 that requires companies to classify certain
gains and losses from debt extinguishments as extraordinary items, eliminates
the provisions of SFAS 44 regarding transition to the Motor Carrier Act of 1980
and amends the provisions of SFAS 13 to require that certain lease modifications
be treated as sale leaseback transactions. The provisions of SFAS 145 related to
classification of debt extinguishment are effective for fiscal years beginning
after May 15, 2002. In future periods, the Company will classify debt
extinguishment costs within income from operations and will reclassify
previously reported debt extinguishments as such. The provisions of SFAS 145
related to lease modification are effective for transactions occurring after May
15, 2002. The Company does not expect the provisions of SFAS 145 related to
lease modification to have a material impact on its financial position or
results of operations.
In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated
with Exit or Disposal Activities". SFAS No. 146 will supersede Emerging Issues
Task Force Issue No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee
Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain
Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)." SFAS No. 146 requires that costs associated
with an exit or disposal plan be recognized when incurred rather than at the
date of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan. SFAS No. 146 is to be applied
prospectively to exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002.
This statement will impact the timing of recognition of costs associated with
the Company's store closures after December 31, 2002.
6. Asset Disposition Initiative
In May 1998, the Company initiated an assessment of its business operations in
order to identify the factors that were impacting the performance of the
Company. As a result of this assessment, in fiscal 1998 and 1999, the Company
announced a plan to close two warehouse facilities and a coffee plant in the
U.S., a bakery plant in Canada and 166 stores including the exit of the
Richmond, Virginia and Atlanta, Georgia markets.
As of February 23, 2002, the Company had closed all stores and facilities
related to this phase of the initiative. The Company paid $29 million of the
total net severance charges from the time of the original charges through
September 7, 2002, which resulted from the termination of approximately 3,400
employees. The remaining severance liability primarily relates to future
obligations for early withdrawals from multi-employer union pension plans.
The following table summarizes the activity related to the aforementioned
charges since the beginning of fiscal 2001:
Severance
Store and
Occupancy Benefits Total
---------------- --------------- ---------------
Reserve Balance at Feb. 24, 2001 $ 82,861 $ 2,721 $ 85,582
Addition 3,818 (1) - 3,818
Utilization (23,302)(2) (544) (23,846)
---------- ---------- ----------
Reserve Balance at Feb. 23, 2002 63,377 2,177 65,554
Addition 1,861 (1) - 1,861
Utilization (7,829)(2) (247) (8,076)
---------- ---------- ----------
Reserve Balance at September 7, 2002 $ 57,409 $ 1,930 $ 59,339
========== ========== ==========
(1) The additions to store occupancy of $3.8 million and $1.9 million during
fiscal 2001 and the 28 weeks ended September 7, 2002 represent the present
value of accrued interest related to lease obligations.
(2) Store occupancy utilization of $23.3 million and $7.8 million for fiscal
2001 and the 28 weeks ended September 7, 2002 represent lease and other
occupancy payments made during those periods.
At September 7, 2002, approximately $9.4 million of the reserve was included in
"Other accruals" and the remaining amount was included in "Other non-current
liabilities" on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Included in the Statements of Consolidated Operations are the operating results
of the aforementioned stores while they were open during the periods presented.
The operating results of these stores were as follows:
12 Weeks Ended 28 Weeks Ended
------------------------------- -------------------------------
Sept. 7, Sept. 8, Sept. 7, Sept. 8,
2002 2001 2002 2001
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Sales $ - $ 16 $ - $ 197
============= ============= ============= =============
Operating loss $ - $ (62) $ - $ (108)
============= ============== ============= ==============
During the third quarter of fiscal 2001, the Company's Board of Directors
approved a plan resulting from Management's review of the performance and
potential of each of the Company's businesses and individual stores. At the
conclusion of this review, the Company determined that certain underperforming
operations, including 39 stores (30 in the United States and 9 in Canada) and 3
warehouses should be closed and/or sold, and certain administrative streamlining
should take place. As a result of these decisions, the Company announced on
November 14, 2001 that it would incur costs of approximately $200 - $215 million
pretax through the third quarter of fiscal 2002. The following table details the
amounts charged to the Statements of Consolidated Operations since the
announcement of the initiative.
12 Weeks 28 Weeks
Ended Ended
(In millions) Sept. 7, 2002 Sept. 7, 2002 Fiscal 2001
------------------ ------------------ ------------------
Cost of merchandise sold $ 0.2 (a) $ 1.1 (a) $ 3.9 (a)
Store operating, general and
administrative expense 1.1 (b) 7.2 (c) 189.6 (d)
------------ ------------ ------------
Pretax charge $ 1.3 $ 8.3 $ 193.5
============ ============ ============
(a) The amounts included in "Cost of merchandise sold" in the Statements of
Consolidated Operations were comprised solely of inventory markdowns that
were expensed as incurred.
(b) The entire pretax charge of $1.1 million included in "Store operating,
general and administrative expense" in the Statement of Consolidated
Operations for the 12 weeks ended September 7, 2002 related to closing
costs that were expensed as incurred.
(c) Of the pretax charges of $7.2 million included in "Store operating,
general and administrative expense" in the Statement of Consolidated
Operations for the 28 weeks ended September 7, 2002, $3.6 million related
to severance and $3.6 million related to closing costs that were expensed
as incurred.
(d) Of the net pretax charges of $189.6 million included in "Store operating,
general and administrative expense" in the Statement of Consolidated
Operations for fiscal 2001, $80.8 million related to future vacancy costs,
$24.3 million related to net severance charges, $81.5 million related to
fixed asset and goodwill write-downs, and $3.0 million related to closing
costs that were expensed as incurred.
To the extent fixed assets included in the items noted above could be used in
other continuing operations, the Company has or will transfer those assets as
needed. Fixed assets that the Company cannot transfer to other operations will
be scrapped. Accordingly, the write-down recorded during fiscal 2001 was based
on expected transfers.
Included in the $193.5 million net charges recorded during fiscal 2001 were
other charges related to the plan that were not accounted for in the reserve
recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets because they were expensed as
incurred. Such costs have been, and will continue to be, expensed as incurred
while the asset disposition is being executed. During fiscal 2001, these costs
amounted to $8.7 million, which were primarily related to non-accruable closing
costs and inventory markdowns. Also included in the $193.5 million net charges
was a reversal of previously accrued severance and benefits of $0.6 million
related to a reduction in the severance payments required to be made to certain
store employees in Canada in accordance with Ontario provincial law. Included in
the $1.3 million and $8.3 million pretax charges recorded during the 12 and 28
weeks ended September 7, 2002, were similar items that were not accounted for in
the reserve recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets because they were
expensed as incurred. These costs amounted to $1.3 million and $4.7 million,
which were primarily related to non-accruable closing costs and inventory
markdowns for the 12 and 28 weeks ended September 7, 2002. These costs for all
periods discussed are excluded from the table below which represents only the
reserve recorded on the balance sheet as well as the goodwill/fixed asset
write-downs.
The following table summarizes the activity related to the aforementioned
reserve recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets since the announcement of
the charge in November 2001:
Severance
and Goodwill/
Occupancy Benefits Fixed Assets Total
--------------- ---------------- -------------- ----------------
Original Charge $ 80,456 $ 23,435 $ 81,519 $ 185,410
Addition (1) 1,673 - - 1,673
Utilization (2) (1,806) (2,891) (81,519) (86,216)
Adjustment (3) - (584) - (584)
----------- ------------- ----------- ------------
Reserve Balance at
February 23, 2002 80,323 19,960 - 100,283
Addition (1) 2,502 3,544 - 6,046
Utilization (2) (14,407) (15,455) - (29,862)
----------- ------------- ----------- ------------
Reserve Balance at
September 7, 2002 $ 68,418 $ 8,049 $ - $ 76,467
=========== ============= =========== ============
(1) The additions to occupancy of $1.7 million and $2.5 million during
fiscal 2001 and the 28 weeks ended September 7, 2002 represent the
present value of accrued interest related to lease obligations. The
addition to severance of $3.5 million during the 28 weeks ended
September 7, 2002 related to retention and productivity incentives that
were accrued as earned.
(2) Occupancy utilization of $1.8 million and $14.4 million during fiscal
2001 and the 28 weeks ended September 7, 2002 represents vacancy
related payments for closed locations. Severance utilization of $2.9
million and $15.5 million during fiscal 2001 and the 28 weeks ended
September 7, 2002 represents payments made to terminated employees
during the period. Goodwill/fixed asset utilization of $81.5 million
during fiscal 2001 represents the write-off of fixed assets of the
operations to be discontinued and the write-off of goodwill related to
the Barn warehouse in Canada that was deemed to be impaired.
(3) At each balance sheet date, Management assesses the adequacy of the
reserve balance to determine if any adjustments are required as a
result of changes in circumstances and/or estimates. As a result,
during fiscal 2001, the Company recorded an adjustment to severance
and benefits of $0.6 million related to a reduction in the severance
payments required to be made to certain store employees in Canada.
Under Ontario provincial law, employees to be terminated as part of a
mass termination are entitled to receive compensation, either worked
or paid as severance, for a set period of time after the official
notice date. Since such closures took place later than originally
expected, less time remained in the aforementioned guarantee
period.
As of September 7, 2002, the Company paid approximately $18 million of the total
severance charge recorded which resulted from the termination of approximately
970 employees. The remaining individual severance payments will be paid by the
end of fiscal 2003.
At September 7, 2002, approximately $18.5 million of the reserve was included in
"Other accruals" and the remaining amount was included in "Other non-current
liabilities" on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Included in the Statements of Consolidated Operations are the operating results
of the aforementioned stores while they were open during the periods presented.
The operating results of these stores were as follows:
12 Weeks Ended 28 Weeks Ended
------------------------------- -------------------------------
Sept. 7, Sept. 8, Sept. 7, Sept. 8,
2002 2001 2002 2001
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Sales $ 7,434 $ 69,636 $ 26,546 $ 167,686
============= ============ ============= =============
Operating loss $ (932) $ (6,853) $ (2,220) $ (14,807)
============= ============ ============= =============
As of September 7, 2002, the Company closed 37 of the aforementioned stores.
Based upon current available information, Management evaluated the reserve
balances as of September 7, 2002 of $59.3 million for the 1998 phase of the
asset disposition initiative and $76.5 million for the 2001 phase of the asset
disposition initiative and has concluded that they are adequate. The Company
will continue to monitor the status of the vacant properties and adjustments to
the reserve balances will be recorded in the future, if necessary.
7. Operating Segments
Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which
separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the
chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in
assessing performance. The Company's chief operating decision maker is the Chief
Executive Officer.
The Company currently operates in three reportable segments: United States
Retail, Canada Retail and Canada Wholesale. The retail segments are comprised of
retail supermarkets in the United States and Canada, while the wholesale segment
is comprised of the Company's Canadian operation that serves as the exclusive
wholesaler to the Company's franchised stores and serves as wholesaler to
certain third party retailers.
The accounting policies for the segments are the same as those described in the
summary of significant accounting policies included in the Company's Fiscal 2001
Annual Report. The Company measures segment performance based upon income (loss)
from operations.
Interim information on segments is as follows:
12 Weeks Ended 28 Weeks Ended
---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------
(Dollars in thousands) September 8, September 8,
September 7, 2001 September 7, 2001
2002 As Restated 2002 As Restated
------------------ ------------------ ----------------- -----------------
Sales
U.S. Retail $ 1,888,469 $ 1,977,265 $ 4,401,647 $ 4,607,193
Canada Retail 451,934 416,431 1,024,818 967,008
Canada Wholesale 160,075 153,894 381,251 361,683
------------------ ------------------ ----------------- -----------------
Total Company $ 2,500,478 $ 2,547,590 $ 5,807,716 $ 5,935,884
================== ================== ================= =================
Depreciation and amortization
U.S. Retail $ 52,385 $ 52,728 $ 117,415 $ 124,388
Canada Retail 9,459 8,323 21,335 18,868
Canada Wholesale - - - -
------------------ ------------------ ----------------- -----------------
Total Company $ 61,844 $ 61,051 $ 138,750 $ 143,256
================== ================== ================= =================
(Loss) income from operations
U.S. Retail $ (26,679) $ 82 $ (20,266) $ 15,832
Canada Retail 16,754 10,251 28,256 16,289
Canada Wholesale 6,760 5,943 16,616 13,780
------------------ ------------------ ----------------- -----------------
Total Company $ (3,165) $ 16,276 $ 24,606 $ 45,901
================== ================== ================= =================
(Loss) income before income taxes
and extraordinary item
U.S. Retail $ (42,343) $ (17,872) $ (59,523) $ (28,974)
Canada Retail 15,687 8,903 25,698 12,822
Canada Wholesale 6,956 6,168 17,103 14,313
------------------ ------------------ ----------------- -----------------
Total Company $ (19,700) $ (2,801) $ (16,722) $ (1,839)
================== ================== ================= =================
Capital expenditures
U.S. Retail $ 38,895 $ 39,400 $ 108,249 $ 102,055
Canada Retail 6,633 3,163 25,770 21,426
Canada Wholesale - - - -
------------------ ------------------ ----------------- -----------------
Total Company $ 45,528 $ 42,563 $ 134,019 $ 123,481
================== ================== ================= =================
September 7, February 23,
2002 2002
----------------- -----------------
Total assets
U.S. Retail $ 2,371,195 $ 2,595,810
Canada Retail 543,701 521,278
Canada Wholesale 71,264 73,358
----------------- -----------------
Total Company $ 2,986,160 $ 3,190,446
================= =================
8. Gain On Proceeds From The Demutualization Of A Mutual Insurance Company
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2001, the Company received cash and common
stock totaling $60.6 million from the demutualization of The Prudential
Insurance Company. This amount was recorded as a nonrecurring gain and included
in the determination of pretax income for fiscal 2001. During the 28 weeks ended
September 7, 2002, the Company sold its remaining holdings in this common stock
and recognized a gain of $1.7 million. This gain was included in "Store
operating, general and administrative expense" on the Company's Statement of
Consolidated Operations for the 28 weeks ended September 7, 2002.
9. Commitments and Contingencies
On January 13, 2000, the Attorney General of the State of New York filed an
action in New York Supreme Court, County of New York, alleging that the Company
and its subsidiary Shopwell, Inc., together with the Company's outside delivery
service Chelsea Trucking, Inc., violated New York law by failing to pay minimum
and overtime wages to individuals who delivered groceries at one of the Food
Emporium's stores in New York City. The complaint seeks a determination of
violation of law, an unspecified amount of restitution, an injunction and costs.
A purported class action lawsuit was filed on January 13, 2000 in the federal
district court for the Southern District of New York against the Company,
Shopwell, Inc. and others by Faty Ansoumana and others. The federal court action
makes similar minimum wage and overtime pay allegations under both federal and
state law and extends the allegations to various stores operated by the Company.
In May 2001, the federal court granted plaintiffs' motion for certification of a
class action. On September 18, 2002, the plaintiffs, the Attorney General and
the Company entered into a Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement pursuant to
which the Company would pay approximately $3 million in full settlement of the
actions and would receive releases from the class and the Attorney General, and
the actions would be dismissed with prejudice. The proposed settlement remains
subject to, among other things, the approval of the federal court. The
settlement amount has been accrued for and is included in "Other accruals" on
the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets.
On June 5, 2002, a purported securities class action Complaint was filed in the
United States District Court for the District of New Jersey against the Company
and certain of its officers and directors in an action captioned Brody v. The
Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc., Civ. Action No. 02-2674 (FSH). On June
17, 2002, June 26, 2002, July 18, 2002 and July 31, 2002, four similar purported
class action Complaints, captioned Huelsman v. The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea
Co., Inc., Civ. Action No. 02-2882 (JAG); Davis v. The Great Atlantic & Pacific
Tea Co., Inc., Civ. Action No. 02-3059 (WGB); Aurelien v. The Great Atlantic &
Pacific Tea Co., Inc., Civ. Action No. 02-3442 (FSH); and Johnson v. The Great
Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc., Civ. Action No. 02-3700 (FSH), respectively,
were filed in the same federal district court. (The lawsuits are referred to
collectively hereinafter as the "Class Action Lawsuits.") The Complaints in the
Class Action Lawsuits purport to assert claims under Sections 10(b) (and Rule
10b-5 promulgated thereunder) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
arising out of the Company's accounting practices, and allege that the Company
made material misrepresentations and omissions concerning its financial results.
The Complaints in the Class Action Lawsuits seek unspecified money damages,
costs and expenses. On July 17, 2002, the United States District Court for the
District of New Jersey, upon motion by the plaintiff, dismissed the Davis Class
Action Lawsuit, without prejudice and without costs against any party. On
September 9, 2002, the Court entered an Order consolidating the Class Action
Lawsuits and appointing Lead Plaintiffs and Lead and Liaison Plaintiffs'
Counsel. A single Consolidated Amended Complaint is to be filed by plaintiffs in
the Class Action Lawsuits.
On May 31, 2002, a stockholders' derivative Complaint was filed in the Superior
Court of New Jersey in Bergen County against the Company's directors (some of
whom are also executive officers) in an action captioned Osher v. Barline, Civ.
Action No. BER L-4673-02 (N.J. Super. Ct.) (the "Derivative Lawsuit"). The
Complaint alleges that the defendants violated their fiduciary obligations to
the Company and its stockholders by failing to establish and maintain adequate
accounting controls and mismanaging the assets and business of the Company, and
seeks unspecified money damages, costs and expenses. On September 13, 2002, the
parties submitted for the Court's consideration a stipulation and proposed Order
staying the Derivative Lawsuit.
The Company is subject to various other legal proceedings and claims, either
asserted or unasserted, which arise in the ordinary course of business. The
Company is also subject to certain environmental claims. While the outcome of
these claims cannot be predicted with certainty, Management does not believe
that the outcome of any of these legal matters will have a material adverse
effect on the Company's consolidated results of operations, financial position
or cash flows.
ITEM 2 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
INTRODUCTION
- ------------
This Management's Discussion and Analysis describes matters considered by
Management to be significant to understanding the financial position, results of
operations and liquidity of the Company, including a discussion of the results
of operations as well as liquidity and capital resources. These items are
presented as follows:
o Basis of Presentation -- a discussion of the Company's fiscal year end and
interim reporting periods.
o Operating Results and Liquidity and Capital Resources -- a discussion of the
following:
- Results for the 12 weeks ended September 7, 2002 compared to the 12 weeks
ended September 8, 2001;
- Results for the 28 weeks ended September 7, 2002 compared to the 28 weeks
ended September 8, 2001;
- The Company's Asset Disposition Initiative; and
- Current and expected future liquidity.
o Critical Accounting Policies -- a discussion of significant estimates made by
Management.
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
- ---------------------
The Company's fiscal year ends on the last Saturday in February. Fiscal 2001
ended February 23, 2002, fiscal 2000 ended February 24, 2001 and fiscal 1999
ended February 26, 2000. Fiscal 2001, fiscal 2000 and fiscal 1999 were each
comprised of 52 weeks. The first quarter of each fiscal year contains 16 weeks,
while the other quarters each contain 12 weeks. As such, the second quarter
year-to-date periods consist of 28 weeks. Except where noted, all per share data
presented is both basic and diluted.
OPERATING RESULTS AND LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
- -----------------------------------------------------
12 WEEKS ENDED SEPTEMBER 7, 2002 COMPARED TO THE 12 WEEKS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 8, 2001
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OVERALL
- -------
Sales for the second quarter of fiscal 2002 were $2.50 billion, compared with
$2.55 billion in the second quarter of fiscal 2001; comparable store sales
increased 0.5%. Net loss per share for the second quarter of fiscal 2002 was
$3.76 compared to a net loss per share of $0.05 for the second quarter of fiscal
2001. Included in the Company's results for the second quarter of fiscal 2002
was a charge of $134 million relating to a U.S. net deferred tax asset valuation
allowance ($3.48 per share; see Note 3 of the Company's Consolidated Financial
Statements) and a $1.3 million charge ($0.8 million after tax or $0.02 per
share) relating to its asset disposition initiative (see Note 6 of the Company's
Consolidated Financial Statements).
The following schedule details the adjustments from "as reported" to "as
adjusted" results for the second quarter of fiscal 2002:
Adjustments to be
Second (added) subtracted Second Second
Quarter ------------------------------- Quarter Quarter
2002 Asset Deferred tax 2002 2001
results as disposition asset valuation results results
(In Millions) reported initiative allowance as adjusted As Restated*
--------------- -------------- --------------- ----------- --------------
Sales $ 2,500.5 $ - $ - $ 2,500.5 $ 2,547.6
Cost of merchandise sold (1,790.9) (0.2) - (1,790.7) (1,810.2)
------------ -------- ---------- ---------- -------------
Gross margin 709.6 (0.2) - 709.8 737.4
Rate to sales 28.38% 28.38% 28.94%
Store operating, general and
administrative expense (712.8) (1.1) - (711.7) (721.1)
Rate to sales 28.50% 28.46% 28.31%
------------ --------- ---------- ---------- ------------
(Loss) income from operations (3.2) (1.3) - (1.9) 16.3
Interest expense (19.6) - - (19.6) (21.0)
Interest income 3.1 - - 3.1 1.9
------------ --------- ---------- ---------- -------------
Loss before income taxes and
extraordinary item (19.7) (1.3) - (18.4) (2.8)
(Provision for) benefit
from income taxes (125.0) 0.5 (133.7) 8.2 1.1
------------ ----------- ---------- ---------- ------------
Net loss before reinstatement of
tax benefit (144.7) (0.8) (133.7) (10.2) (1.7)
Reinstatement of tax benefit on
extraordinary item - - (0.3) 0.3 -
------------- ------------ ---------- ---------- -------------
Net loss $ (144.7) $ (0.8) $ (134.0) $ (9.9) $ (1.7)
============ ============ ========== ========== =============
* See Note 2 - Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements in the
Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.
SALES
- -----
Sales for the second quarter of fiscal 2002 of $2,501 million decreased $47
million or 1.8% from sales of $2,548 million for the second quarter of fiscal
2001. The lower sales were due to a decrease in retail sales of $53 million
offset by an increase in wholesale sales of $6 million. The decrease in retail
sales was attributable to the closure of 91 stores since the beginning of the
second quarter of fiscal 2001, of which 31 were closed in fiscal 2002, which
decreased sales by $115 million. Included in the 91 stores closed since the
beginning of second quarter of fiscal 2001 were 37 stores closed as part of the
asset disposition initiative. Additionally, the unfavorable effect of the
Canadian exchange rate decreased sales by $5 million. This decrease was
partially offset by the opening of 34 new stores since the beginning of the
second quarter of fiscal 2001, of which 19 were opened in fiscal 2002,
increasing sales by $62 million. This was additionally offset by increased
comparable store sales, which include replacement stores, for the second quarter
of fiscal 2002 of 0.5% (down 1.2% in the U.S. and up 8.3% in Canada) when
compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2001. The increase in wholesale sales
was attributable to higher sales volume of $8 million partially offset by the
unfavorable effect of the Canadian exchange rate which decreased sales by $2
million.
Sales in the U.S. for the second quarter of fiscal 2002 decreased $89 million or
4.5% compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2001. Sales in Canada for the
second quarter of fiscal 2002 increased $42 million or 7.3% from the second
quarter of fiscal 2001.
Average weekly sales per supermarket were approximately $289,800 for the second
quarter of fiscal 2002 versus $275,100 for the corresponding period of the prior
year, an increase of 5.3%. This increase was primarily due to the following:
o Closure of smaller stores with lower average weekly sales;
o Closure of underperforming stores; and
o Opening and remodeling of larger stores.
GROSS MARGIN
- ------------
Gross margin as a percentage of sales decreased 56 basis points to 28.38% for
the second quarter of fiscal 2002 from 28.94% for the second quarter of fiscal
2001. This decrease was caused primarily by the following:
o More aggressive promotional activity in the U.S. stores and the coffee
business during the current period in order to drive sales volume in
response to competitive pressures; and
o Increased warehousing costs as a percentage of sales in the U.S. due to the
fixed nature of such costs.
The gross margin dollar decrease of $28 million resulted from decreases in sales
volume, the gross margin rate and the Canadian exchange rate. The U.S.
operations gross margin decrease of $35 million resulted from decreases of $27
million due to lower sales volume and $8 million due to a lower gross margin
rate. The Canadian operations gross margin increase of $7 million resulted from
an increase of $11 million due to higher sales volume partially offset by
decreases of $2 million due to a lower gross margin rate and $2 million from
fluctuations in the Canadian exchange rate.
Also included in gross margin for the second quarter of fiscal 2002 were costs
related to the Company's asset disposition initiative of $0.2 million which were
incurred to mark down inventory in stores announced for closure. This charge did
not impact gross margin as a percentage of sales for the second quarter of
fiscal 2002. Gross margin for the second quarter of fiscal 2001 included costs
of $1.1 million incurred as part of the Company's business process initiative.
These costs were incurred to mark down inventory to be discontinued as a result
of detailed category management studies.
STORE OPERATING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE
- ---------------------------------------------------
Store operating, general and administrative expense ("SG&A") was $713 million
for the second quarter of fiscal 2002 compared to $721 million for the second
quarter of fiscal 2001. As a percentage of sales, SG&A was 28.50% for the second
quarter of fiscal 2002 compared to 28.31% for the second quarter of fiscal 2001.
Included in SG&A for the second quarter of fiscal 2002 were costs relating to
the Company's asset disposition initiative of $1.1 million as described in Note
6 of the Consolidated Financial Statements. Excluding this item, SG&A was $712
million or 28.46% as a percentage of sales for the second quarter of fiscal 2002
compared to $721 million or 28.31% for the second quarter of fiscal 2001. This
increase of 15 basis points was primarily due to the following:
o Increased labor costs as a percentage of sales in the U.S.;
o More aggressive advertising activity in the U.S. and Canada during the
current period in order to drive sales volume in response to competitive
pressures;
o Higher occupancy costs as a percentage of sales in the U.S. due to the
fixed nature of such costs; and
o Costs associated with the restatement of previously issued financial
statements as discussed further in Note 2 of the Company's Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Partially offset by the following:
o Lower management bonus expenses;
o Improved results on the disposal of fixed assets; and
o Lower expenditures related to the Company's business process initiative
which has been ongoing since fiscal 2000 (the "business process
initiative").
Included in SG&A for the second quarters of fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2001 were $15
million and $22 million, respectively, relating to the Company's business
process initiative. Such costs primarily included professional consulting fees
and salaries, including related benefits, of employees working full-time on the
initiative.
INTEREST EXPENSE
- ----------------
Interest expense of $20 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2002 decreased
from the prior year amount of $21 million due primarily to the following:
o Lower interest expense on the Company's Secured Credit Agreement during the
second quarter of fiscal 2002 compared to the second quarter of fiscal
2001; and
o The Company's effective utilization of interest rate swaps which commenced
in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2001.
Partially offset by the following:
o Higher interest expense on the $275 million 9.125% Senior Notes due
December 15, 2011 which were issued to refinance $178 million of the $200
million 7.70% Senior Notes due January 15, 2004.
The decreased borrowing requirement on the Company's Secured Credit Agreement
was caused by the following:
o Proceeds received from the refinancing of $178 million of the $200 million
7.70% Senior Notes due January 15, 2004 with the issuance of $275 million
9.125% Senior Notes due December 15, 2011;
o Proceeds received on the sale leaseback transactions described in Note 14
of the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company's Fiscal 2001
Annual Report on Form 10-K; and
o Proceeds received as a result of the demutualization of the Prudential
Insurance Company as described in Note 8 of the Company's Consolidated
Financial Statements filed herein.
INCOME TAXES
- ------------
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 109 "Accounting for
Income Taxes" ("SFAS 109") requires that a valuation allowance be created and
offset against the net deferred tax asset if, based on existing facts and
circumstances, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the net
deferred tax asset will not be realized. Based upon the Company's continued
assessment of the realization of its U.S. net deferred tax asset and its
historic cumulative losses, the Company concluded that it was appropriate to
establish a full valuation allowance for its U.S. net deferred tax asset in the
amount of approximately $134 million during the 12 weeks ended September 7,
2002. In future periods, U.S. earnings or losses will not be tax effected until
such time as the certainty of future tax benefits can be reasonably assured.
28 WEEKS ENDED SEPTEMBER 7, 2002 COMPARED TO THE 28 WEEKS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 8, 2001
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OVERALL
- -------
Sales for the 28 weeks ended September 7, 2002 were $5.81 billion, compared with
$5.94 billion for the 28 weeks ended September 8, 2001; comparable store sales
increased 0.3%. Net loss per share for the 28 weeks ended September 7, 2002 was
$3.71 compared to a net loss per share of $0.07 for the 28 weeks ended September
8, 2001. Included in the Company's results for the 28 weeks ended September 7,
2002 was a $134 million U.S. net deferred tax asset valuation allowance ($3.48
per share; see Note 3 of the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements), an
extraordinary after tax charge of $0.4 million or $0.01 per share for the cost
of repurchasing $37.7 million of its 7.75% Notes due April 15, 2007, an $8.3
million charge ($4.9 million after tax or $0.13 per share) relating to its asset
disposition initiative (see Note 6 of the Company's Consolidated Financial
Statements), and a nonrecurring pretax gain of $1.7 million ($1.0 million after
tax or $0.03 per share) from proceeds received as a result of the sale of
securities received as part of the demutualization of The Prudential Insurance
Company (see Note 8 of the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements).
The following schedule details the adjustments from "as reported" to "as
adjusted" results for the 28 weeks ended September 7, 2002:
Adjustments to be (added) subtracted
28 Weeks --------------------------------------------- 28 Weeks 28 Weeks
Ended Deferred Gain on Ended Ended
Sept. 7, 2002 Asset Extra- tax asset sale of Sept. 7, 2002 Sept. 8, 2001
results as disposition ordinary valuation common results results
(In Millions) reported initiative loss allowance stock as adjusted As Restated*
------------- ------------- --------- --------- --------- -------------- ------------
Sales $ 5,807.7 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,807.7 $ 5,935.9
Cost of merchandise sold (4,150.6) (1.0) - - - (4,149.6) (4,228.1)
------------ ----------- -------- -------- -------- ------------ -----------
Gross margin 1,657.1 (1.0) - - 1,658.1 1,707.8
Rate to sales 28.53% 28.55% 28.77%
Store operating, general and
administrative expense (1,632.5) (7.3) - - 1.7 (1,626.9) (1,661.9)
Rate to sales 28.11% 28.01% 28.00%
------------ ------------ -------- -------- -------- ------------ ----------
Income (loss) from operations 24.6 (8.3) - - 1.7 31.2 45.9
Interest expense (46.4) - - - - (46.4) (51.5)
Interest income 5.1 - - - - 5.1 3.8
------------ ----------- -------- -------- -------- ------------ -------------
(Loss) income before
income taxes and
extraordinary item (16.7) (8.3) - - 1.7 (10.1) (1.8)
(Provision for) benefit
from income taxes (125.4) 3.4 - (133.7) (0.7) 5.6 (0.9)
------------ ----------- -------- ------- -------- ------------ ------------
Net (loss) income before
extraordinary item (142.1) (4.9) - (133.7) 1.0 (4.5) (2.7)
Extraordinary loss on
early extinguishment
of debt (0.7) - (0.4) (0.3) - - -
------------ ----------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ -------------
Net (loss) income $ (142.8) $ (4.9) $ (0.4) $(134.0) $ 1.0 $ (4.5) $ (2.7)
============ =========== ======= ======= ======== ============ =============
* See Note 2 - Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements in the
Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.
SALES
- -----
Sales for the 28 weeks ended September 7, 2002 of $5,808 million decreased $128
million or 2.2% from sales of $5,936 million for the 28 weeks ended September 8,
2001. The lower sales were due to a decrease in retail sales of $148 million
partially offset by an increase in wholesale sales of $20 million. The decrease
in retail sales was attributable to the closure of 103 stores since the
beginning of fiscal 2001, of which 31 were closed in fiscal 2002, which
decreased sales by $257 million. Included in the 103 stores closed since the
beginning of fiscal 2001 were 37 stores closed as part of the asset disposition
initiative. Additionally, the unfavorable effect of the Canadian exchange rate
decreased sales by $13 million. This decrease was partially offset by the
opening of 40 new stores since the beginning of fiscal 2001, of which 19 were
opened in fiscal 2002, increasing sales by $109 million. This was additionally
offset by increased comparable store sales, which include replacement stores,
for the 28 weeks ended September 7, 2002 of 0.3% (down 1.1% in the U.S. and up
6.8% in Canada) when compared to the 28 weeks ended September 8, 2001. The
increase in wholesale sales was attributable to higher sales volume of $24
million partially offset by the unfavorable effect of the Canadian exchange rate
which decreased sales by $4 million.
Sales in the U.S. for the 28 weeks ended September 7, 2002 decreased by $205
million or 4.5% compared to the 28 weeks ended September 8, 2001. Sales in
Canada for the 28 weeks ended September 7, 2002 increased by $77 million or 5.8%
from the 28 weeks ended September 8, 2001.
Average weekly sales per supermarket were approximately $287,100 for the 28
weeks ended September 7, 2002 versus $273,800 for the corresponding period of
the prior year, an increase of 4.9%. This increase was primarily due to the
closure of stores with lower average weekly sales.
GROSS MARGIN
- ------------
Gross margin as a percentage of sales decreased 24 basis points to 28.53% for
the 28 weeks ended September 7, 2002 from 28.77% for the 28 weeks ended
September 8, 2001. The gross margin dollar decrease of $51 million resulted from
decreases in sales volume, the gross margin rate and the Canadian exchange rate.
The U.S. operations gross margin decrease of $65 million resulted from decreases
of $63 million due to lower sales volume and $2 million due to a lower gross
margin rate. The Canadian operations gross margin increase of $14 million
resulted from an increase of $21 million due to higher sales volume partially
offset by decreases of $3 million due to a lower gross margin rate and $4
million from fluctuations in the Canadian exchange rate.
Included in gross margin for the 28 weeks ended September 7, 2002 were costs
related to the Company's asset disposition initiative of $1.0 million which were
incurred to mark down inventory in stores announced for closure. Excluding this
charge, as a percentage of sales, the gross margin rate would have been 28.55%
for the 28 weeks ended September 7, 2002 compared to 28.77% for the 28 weeks
ended September 8, 2001. This decrease was caused primarily by the following:
o More aggressive promotional activity in the U.S. stores and the coffee
business during the current period in order to drive sales volume in
response to competitive pressures; and
o Increased inventory shrink losses during the current year period compared
to the prior year period.
Gross margin for the 28 weeks ended September 8, 2001 included costs of $5.6
million incurred as part of the Company's business process initiative. These
costs were incurred to mark down inventory to be discontinued as a result of
detailed category management studies.
STORE OPERATING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE
- ---------------------------------------------------
Store operating, general and administrative expense ("SG&A") was $1,632 million
for the 28 weeks ended September 7, 2002 compared to $1,662 million for the 28
weeks ended September 8, 2001. As a percentage of sales, SG&A was 28.11% for the
28 weeks ended September 7, 2002 compared to 28.00% for the 28 weeks ended
September 8, 2001. Included in SG&A for the 28 weeks ended September 7, 2002
were costs relating to the Company's asset disposition initiative of $7.2
million as described in Note 6 of the Consolidated Financial Statements. Also
included in SG&A for the 28 weeks ended September 7, 2002 was a gain of $1.7
million related to the sale of securities received as part of the
demutualization of the Prudential Insurance Company as described in Note 8 of
the Consolidated Financial Statements. Excluding these items, SG&A was $1,627
million or 28.01% as a percentage of sales for the 28 weeks ended September 7,
2002 compared to $1,662 million or 28.00% for the 28 weeks ended September 8,
2001. The major items impacting SG&A as a percentage of sales for the 28 weeks
ended September 7, 2002 compared to the 28 weeks ended September 8, 2001 were as
follows:
o Increased labor costs as a percentage of sales in the U.S.;
o Higher consulting costs due to a non-merchandise product and service
sourcing initiative; and
o Costs associated with the restatement of previously issued financial
statements as discussed further in Note 2 of the Company's Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Partially offset by the following:
o Gains on the sale of property and equipment;
o Lower depreciation expense as a result of the aforementioned sale of
property and equipment and the asset impairment recognized as a result of
the asset disposition initiative;
o Lower costs related to utilities; and
o Lower costs related to the Company's business process initiative.
Included in SG&A for the 28 weeks ended September 7, 2002 and September 8, 2001
were $35.1 million and $48.9 million, respectively, relating to the Company's
business process initiative. Such costs primarily included professional
consulting fees and salaries, including related benefits, of employees working
full-time on the initiative.
INTEREST EXPENSE
- ----------------
Interest expense of $46 million for the 28 weeks ended September 7, 2002
decreased from the prior year amount of $51 million due primarily to
the following:
o Lower interest expense on the Company's Secured Credit Agreement during the
28 weeks ended September 7, 2002 compared to the 28 weeks ended September
8, 2001; and
o The Company's effective utilization of interest rate swaps which commenced
in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2001.
Partially offset by the following:
o Higher interest expense on the $275 million 9.125% Senior Notes due
December 15, 2011 which were issued to refinance $178 million of the $200
million 7.70% Senior Notes due January 15, 2004.
The decreased borrowing requirement on the Company's Secured Credit Agreement
was caused by the following:
o Proceeds received from the refinancing of $178 million of the $200 million
7.70% Senior Notes due January 15, 2004 with the issuance of $275 million
9.125% Senior Notes due December 15, 2011;
o Proceeds received on the sale leaseback transactions described in Note 14
of the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company's Fiscal 2001
Annual Report on Form 10-K; and
o Proceeds received as a result of the demutualization of the Prudential
Insurance Company as described in Note 8 of the Company's Consolidated
Financial Statements filed herein.
INCOME TAXES
- ------------
SFAS 109 requires that a valuation allowance be created and offset against
the net deferred tax asset if, based on existing facts and circumstances, it is
more likely than not that some portion or all of the net deferred tax asset will
not be realized. Based upon the Company's continued assessment of the
realization of its U.S. net deferred tax asset and its historic cumulative
losses, the Company concluded that it was appropriate to establish a full
valuation allowance for its U.S. net deferred tax asset in the amount of
approximately $134 million during the 28 weeks ended September 7, 2002. In
future periods, U.S. earnings or losses will not be tax effected until such time
as the certainty of future tax benefits can be reasonably assured.
ASSET DISPOSITION INITIATIVE
- ----------------------------
In May 1998, the Company initiated an assessment of its business operations in
order to identify the factors that were impacting the performance of the
Company. As a result of this assessment, in fiscal 1998 and 1999, the Company
announced a plan to close two warehouse facilities and a coffee plant in the
U.S., a bakery plant in Canada and 166 stores including the exit of the
Richmond, Virginia and Atlanta, Georgia markets.
As of February 23, 2002, the Company had closed all stores and facilities
related to this phase of the initiative. The Company paid $29 million of the
total net severance charges from the time of the original charges through
September 7, 2002, which resulted from the termination of approximately 3,400
employees. The remaining severance liability primarily relates to future
obligations for early withdrawals from multi-employer union pension plans.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2001, the Company's Board of Directors
approved a plan resulting from Management's review of the performance and
potential of each of the Company's businesses and individual stores. At the
conclusion of this review, the Company determined that certain underperforming
operations, including 39 stores (30 in the United States and 9 in Canada) and 3
warehouses should be closed and/or sold, and certain administrative streamlining
should take place. As a result of these decisions, the Company announced on
November 14, 2001 that it would incur costs of approximately $200 - $215 million
pretax through the third quarter of fiscal 2002. The following table details
the amounts charged to the Statements of Consolidated Operations since the
announcement of the initiative.
12 Weeks 28 Weeks
Ended Ended
Sept. 7, 2002 Sept. 7, 2002 Fiscal 2001
------------------ ------------------ ------------------
Cost of merchandise sold $ 0.2 (a) $ 1.1 (a) $ 3.9 (a)
Store operating, general and
administrative expense 1.1 (b) 7.2 (c) 189.6 (d)
-------- -------- ---------
Pretax charge $ 1.3 $ 8.3 $ 193.5
======== ======== =========
(a) The amounts included in "Cost of merchandise sold" in the Statements of
Consolidated Operations were comprised of inventory markdowns that were
expensed as incurred.
(b) The entire pretax charge of $1.1 million included in "Store operating,
general and administrative expense" in the Statement of Consolidated
Operations for the 12 weeks ended September 7, 2002 related to closing
costs that were expensed as incurred.
(c) Of the pretax charges of $7.2 million included in "Store operating,
general and administrative expense" in the Statement of Consolidated
Operations for the 28 weeks ended September 7, 2002, $3.6 million related
to severance and $3.6 million related to closing costs that were expensed
as incurred.
(d) Of the net pretax charges of $189.6 million included in "Store operating,
general and administrative expense" in the Statement of Consolidated
Operations for fiscal 2001, $80.8 related to future vacancy costs, $24.3
million related to net severance charges, $81.5 million related to fixed
asset and goodwill write-downs, and $3.0 million related to closing costs
that were expensed as incurred.
To the extent fixed assets included in the items noted above could be used in
other continuing operations, the Company has or will transfer those assets as
needed. Fixed assets that the Company cannot transfer to other operations will
be scrapped. Accordingly, the write-down recorded during fiscal 2001 was based
on expected transfers.
At each balance sheet date, Management assesses the adequacy of the reserve
balance to determine if any adjustments are required as a result of changes in
circumstances and/or estimates. As a result, during fiscal 2001, the Company
recorded an adjustment to severance and benefits of $0.6 million related to a
reduction in the severance payments required to be made to certain store
employees in Canada. Under Ontario provincial law, employees to be terminated as
part of a mass termination are entitled to receive compensation, either worked
or paid as severance, for a set period of time after the official notice date.
Since such closures took place later than originally expected, less time
remained in the aforementioned guarantee period.
As of September 7, 2002, the Company paid approximately $18 million of the total
severance charge recorded which resulted from the termination of approximately
970 employees. The remaining individual severance payments will be paid by the
end of fiscal 2003.
As of September 7, 2002, the Company had closed 37 of the aforementioned stores.
Based upon current available information, Management evaluated the reserve
balances as of September 7, 2002 of $59.3 million for the 1998 phase of the
asset disposition initiative and $76.5 million for the 2001 phase of the asset
disposition initiative and has concluded that they are adequate. The Company
will continue to monitor the status of the vacant properties and adjustments to
the reserve balances will be recorded in the future, if necessary.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
- -------------------------------
The Company had negative working capital of $81 million at September 7, 2002
compared to positive working capital of $28 million at February 23, 2002. The
Company had cash and cash equivalents aggregating $146 million at September 7,
2002 compared to $169 million at the end of fiscal 2001. The decrease in working
capital was attributable primarily to the following:
o A decrease in cash and cash equivalents as detailed in the Consolidated
Statement of Cash Flows;
o A decrease in inventories due to seasonality;
o A decrease in the net deferred tax asset due to the recording of a
valuation allowance for the entire U.S. net deferred tax asset (see Note 3
of the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements);
o A decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets due primarily to
the sale of securities received as part of the demutualization of The
Prudential Insurance Company (see Note 8 of the Company's Consolidated
Financial Statements); and
o An increase in short-term borrowings due to temporary borrowings under the
Company's revolving credit facility.
Partially offset by the following:
o A decrease in accounts payable due to seasonality and timing of
payments; and
o A decrease in other accruals.
At September 7, 2002, the Company had a $425 million secured revolving credit
agreement (the "Secured Credit Agreement") expiring December 31, 2003, with a
syndicate of lenders, enabling it to borrow funds on a revolving basis
sufficient to refinance short-term borrowings and provide working capital as
needed. This agreement was secured primarily by inventory and Company-owned real
estate. The Secured Credit Agreement was comprised of a U.S. credit agreement
amounting to $340 million and a Canadian credit agreement amounting to $85
million (C$133 million at September 7, 2002). As of September 7, 2002, the
Company had $30 million of borrowings under the Secured Credit Agreement.
Accordingly, as of September 7, 2002, after reducing availability for
outstanding letters of credit and inventory requirements, the Company had $255
million available under the Secured Credit Agreement. Borrowings under the
agreement bear interest based on the variable LIBOR pricing. On March 21, 2002
and April 23, 2002, the Company amended the Secured Credit Agreement in order to
allow for, among other things, additional debt repayments, the ability to enter
additional interest rate hedging agreements and an increase in the amount of
letters of credit available under the agreement. In addition, $385 million of
the initial $425 million of loan commitments under the original facility
scheduled to expire in December 2003 was extended for an additional 18 months
and will now expire in June 2005.
The Company's loan agreements and certain of its notes contain various financial
covenants which require, among other things, minimum fixed charge coverage and
maximum levels of leverage and capital expenditures. At September 7, 2002, the
Company was in compliance with all of its covenants. On October 10, 2002, the
Company amended the Secured Credit Agreement to change the fixed charge coverage
ratio from 1.65 to 1.4 for the remainder of the term of the Secured Credit
Agreement.
The Company has active Registration Statements dated January 23, 1998 and June
23, 1999, allowing it to offer up to $75 million of debt and/or equity
securities as of September 7, 2002 at terms determined by market conditions at
the time of sale.
During the 28 weeks ended September 7, 2002, the Company funded its capital
expenditures and debt repayments through internally generated funds combined
with proceeds from disposals of property. Capital expenditures totaled $134
million during the 28 weeks ended September 7, 2002, which included 19 new
supermarkets, 20 major remodels or enlargements and capital expenditures related
to the business process initiative.
For the remainder of fiscal 2002, the Company has planned capital expenditures
of approximately $140 million. These expenditures relate primarily to opening 6
new supermarkets, enlarging or remodeling 50 - 55 supermarkets, and capital
purchases associated with the Company's business process initiative. The Company
currently expects to close a total of approximately 10 stores during the
remainder of fiscal 2002.
The Company does not expect to pay dividends in the foreseeable future.
The Company's existing senior debt rating was B2 with negative implications with
Moody's Investors Service and BB with negative implications with Standard &
Poor's Ratings Group ("S&P") as of September 7, 2002. On October 18, 2002, S&P
lowered its rating on the Company's debt to BB- with negative implications.
Future rating changes could affect the availability and cost of financing to the
Company.
The Company believes that its current cash resources, including the funds
available under the Secured Credit Agreement, together with cash generated from
operations, will be sufficient for the Company's capital expenditure programs
and mandatory scheduled debt repayments for the next twelve months. However,
certain external factors such as unfavorable economic conditions, competition,
labor relations, and fuel and utility costs could have a significant impact on
cash generated from operations.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
- ----------------------------
Critical accounting policies are those accounting policies that Management
believes are important to the portrayal of the Company's financial condition and
results and require Management's most difficult, subjective or complex
judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of
matters that are inherently uncertain.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires Management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Self-Insurance Reserves
- -----------------------
The Consolidated Balance Sheets include liabilities with respect to self-insured
workers' compensation and general liability claims. The Company estimates the
required liability of such claims on a discounted basis, utilizing an actuarial
method which is based upon various assumptions which include, but are not
limited to, the Company's historical loss experience, projected loss development
factors, actual payroll, and other data. The required liability is also subject
to adjustment in the future based upon the changes in claims experience,
including changes in the number of incidents (frequency) and changes in the
ultimate cost per incident (severity).
Long-Lived Assets
- -----------------
The Company reviews the carrying values of its long-lived and identifiable
intangible assets for possible impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of assets may not be
recoverable. Such review is based upon groups of assets and the undiscounted
estimated future cash flows from such assets to determine if the carrying value
of such assets are recoverable from their respective cash flows. If such review
indicates an impairment exists, the Company measures such impairment on a
discounted basis.
Closed Store Reserves
- ---------------------
For stores closed that are under long-term leases, the Company records a
liability for the future minimum lease payments and related costs, such as
utilities and taxes, from the date of closure to the end of the remaining lease
term, net of estimated probable cost recoveries from sublease rentals. If
estimated cost recoveries exceed the liability for future minimum lease
payments, the excess is recognized as income over the term of the sublease. The
Company estimates future net cash flows based on its experience and knowledge of
the market in which the closed store is located. However, these estimates
project net cash flow several years into the future and are affected by variable
factors such as inflation, real estate markets and economic conditions. While
these factors have been relatively stable in recent years, variation in these
factors could cause changes to the Company's estimates.
Income Taxes
- ------------
The Company has net operating loss carryforwards from its Canadian operations.
This net operating loss carryforward will expire between February 2003 and
February 2009. The Company has assessed its ability to utilize the Canadian net
operating loss carryforwards and concluded that no valuation allowance currently
is required since the Company believes that it is more likely than not that the
net operating loss carryforwards will be utilized either by generating taxable
income or through tax planning strategies. However, this cannot be assured.
Accordingly, some portions of these net operating loss carryforwards may expire
before they can be utilized by the Company to reduce its income tax obligations.
As discussed in Note 3 of the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company
recorded a valuation allowance for the entire U.S. net deferred tax asset since,
in accordance with SFAS 109, it was more likely than not that the net deferred
tax asset would not be utilized based on historical cumulative losses. Under
SFAS 109, this valuation allowance could be reversed in future periods if the
Company experiences improvement in its U.S. operations prior to the expiration
of the U.S. net operating loss carryforwards between 2019 and 2022.
Inventories
- -----------
Store inventories are valued principally at the lower of cost or market with
cost determined under the retail method on a first-in, first-out basis.
Warehouse and other inventories are valued primarily at the lower of cost or
market with cost determined on a first-in, first-out basis. Inventories of
certain acquired companies are valued using the last-in, first-out method, which
was their practice prior to acquisition. The Company evaluates inventory
shrinkage throughout the year based on actual physical counts in its stores and
distribution centers and records reserves based on the results of these counts
to provide for the estimated shrinkage as of the balance sheet date.
ITEM 3 - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
MARKET RISK
- -----------
Market risk represents the risk of loss from adverse market changes that may
impact the consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows
of the Company. Among other possible market risks, the Company is exposed to
such risk in the areas of interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates.
From time to time, the Company may enter hedging agreements in order to manage
risks incurred in the normal course of business including the managing of
interest expense and exposure to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. These
agreements may include interest rate swaps, locks, caps, floors and collars as
well as the use of foreign currency swaps and forward exchange contracts.
Interest Rates
- --------------
The Company's exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates
primarily to the Company's debt obligations. The Company has no cash flow
exposure due to rate changes on its $739 million in notes as of September 7,
2002 because they are at fixed interest rates. However, the Company does have
cash flow exposure on its committed and uncommitted bank lines of credit due to
its variable LIBOR pricing. Since the Company has borrowed minimal amounts under
these facilities during the first 28 weeks of fiscal 2002, a presumed 1% change
in LIBOR would not have had a material impact on interest expense.
The Company has entered into three interest rate swaps with commercial banks
with an aggregate notional amount of $150 million, all maturing on April 15,
2007. These hedging agreements were designated as fair value hedging instruments
and effectively convert a portion of the Company's 7.75% Notes due April 15,
2007 from fixed rate debt to floating rate debt. There were no ineffective
changes in fair value of these hedging agreements. At September 7, 2002, these
hedging agreements had a fair value of $11.1 million that was recorded as an
asset on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. An assumed 1% change in
LIBOR during the 12 and 28 weeks ended September 7, 2002 would have impacted
borrowing costs by $0.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively.
Foreign Exchange Risk
- ---------------------
The Company is exposed to foreign exchange risk to the extent of adverse
fluctuations in the Canadian dollar. During the 12 and 28 weeks ended September
7, 2002, a change in the Canadian currency of 10% would have resulted in a
fluctuation in net income of $1.4 million and $2.6 million, respectively. The
Company does not believe that a change in the Canadian currency of 10% will have
a material effect on its financial position or cash flows.
ITEM 4 - Controls and Procedures
Within 90 days prior to the date of this report, the Company's Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer completed an evaluation of the Company's
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-14(c) to the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934). Based on this evaluation, the Company's
Chief Executive Office and Chief Financial Officer believe that the disclosure
controls and procedures are effective with respect to timely communicating to
them all material information required to be disclosed in this report as it
relates to the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries.
This evaluation consisted of a year-end control review that was subsequently
updated in October 2002. The following paragraphs detail Management's
significant areas of focus to further enhance internal controls:
o The Company has implemented certain enhancements, or is in the process of
enhancing, internal controls relating to vendor allowance transactions. The
actions related to vendor allowances include, among others, revising the
vendor allowance transaction reporting form, providing additional training
to employees concerning financial reporting obligations with an emphasis on
vendor allowance transactions, establishing additional internal resources
to account for and review on a regular basis vendor allowance transactions,
and providing additional management and internal audit oversight of vendor
allowances.
o Further, subsequent to September 7, 2002, the Company implemented an
enterprise resource planning system encompassing the finance function and
is in the process of implementing this platform for the human resources
function. This new system provides a common platform for all the Company's
operations, including the improvement of approval and authorization
processes and information flow across the organization. This system will
serve as the record keeping tool for, among others, general ledger,
accounts payable, accounts receivable, fixed assets and payroll.
Other than the above, there were no significant changes in the Company's
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
controls subsequent to the date of the most recently completed evaluation. The
Company also intends to refine its internal control procedures on an ongoing
basis as deemed appropriate with a view towards making improvements.
CAUTIONARY NOTE
- ---------------
This presentation may contain forward-looking statements about the future
performance of the Company, and is based on Management's assumptions and beliefs
in light of information currently available. The Company assumes no obligation
to update this information. These forward-looking statements are subject to
uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from such statements including but not limited to: competitive
practices and pricing in the food industry generally and particularly in the
Company's principal markets; the Company's relationships with its employees; the
terms of future collective bargaining agreements; the costs and other effects of
lawsuits and administrative proceedings; the nature and extent of continued
consolidation in the food industry; changes in the financial markets which may
affect the Company's cost of capital or the ability to access capital; supply or
quality control problems with the Company's vendors; and changes in economic
conditions, which may affect the buying patterns of the Company's customers.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1 - Legal Proceedings
On January 13, 2000, the Attorney General of the State of New York filed an
action in New York Supreme Court, County of New York, alleging that the Company
and its subsidiary Shopwell, Inc., together with the Company's outside delivery
service Chelsea Trucking, Inc., violated New York law by failing to pay minimum
and overtime wages to individuals who delivered groceries at one of the Food
Emporium's stores in New York City. The complaint seeks a determination of
violation of law, an unspecified amount of restitution, an injunction and costs.
A purported class action lawsuit was filed on January 13, 2000 in the federal
district court for the Southern District of New York against the Company,
Shopwell, Inc. and others by Faty Ansoumana and others. The federal court action
makes similar minimum wage and overtime pay allegations under both federal and
state law and extends the allegations to various stores operated by the Company.
In May 2001, the federal court granted plaintiffs' motion for certification of a
class action. On September 18, 2002, the plaintiffs, the Attorney General and
the Company entered into a Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement pursuant to
which the Company would pay approximately $3 million in full settlement of the
actions and would receive releases from the class and the Attorney General, and
the actions would be dismissed with prejudice. The proposed settlement remains
subject to, among other things, the approval of the federal court. The
settlement amount has been accrued for and is included in "Other accruals" on
the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets.
On June 5, 2002, a purported securities class action Complaint was filed in the
United States District Court for the District of New Jersey against the Company
and certain of its officers and directors in an action captioned Brody v. The
Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc., Civ. Action No. 02-2674 (FSH) . On June
17, 2002, June 26, 2002, July 18, 2002 and July 31, 2002, four similar purported
class action Complaints, captioned Huelsman v. The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea
Co., Inc., Civ. Action No. 02-2882 (JAG); Davis v. The Great Atlantic & Pacific
Tea Co., Inc., Civ. Action No. 02-3059 (WGB); Aurelien v. The Great Atlantic &
Pacific Tea Co., Inc., Civ. Action No. 02-3442 (FSH); and Johnson v. The Great
Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc., Civ. Action No. 02-3700 (FSH), respectively,
were filed in the same federal district court. (The lawsuits are referred to
collectively hereinafter as the "Class Action Lawsuits.") The Complaints in the
Class Action Lawsuits purport to assert claims under Sections 10(b) (and Rule
10b-5 promulgated thereunder) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
arising out of the Company's accounting practices, and allege that the Company
made material misrepresentations and omissions concerning its financial results.
The Complaints in the Class Action Lawsuits seek unspecified money damages,
costs and expenses. On July 17, 2002, the United States District Court for the
District of New Jersey, upon motion by the plaintiff, dismissed the Davis Class
Action Lawsuit, without prejudice and without costs against any party. On
September 9, 2002, the Court entered an Order consolidating the Class Action
Lawsuits and appointing Lead Plaintiffs and Lead and Liaison Plaintiffs'
Counsel. A single Consolidated Amended Complaint is to be filed by plaintiffs in
the Class Action Lawsuits.
On May 31, 2002, a stockholders' derivative Complaint was filed in the Superior
Court of New Jersey in Bergen County against the Company's directors (some of
whom are also executive officers) in an action captioned Osher v. Barline, Civ.
Action No. BER L-4673-02 (N.J. Super. Ct.) (the "Derivative Lawsuit"). The
Complaint alleges that the defendants violated their fiduciary obligations to
the Company and its stockholders by failing to establish and maintain adequate
accounting controls and mismanaging the assets and business of the Company, and
seeks unspecified money damages, costs and expenses. On September 13, 2002, the
parties submitted for the Court's consideration a stipulation and proposed Order
staying the Derivative Lawsuit.
The Company is subject to various other legal proceedings and claims, either
asserted or unasserted, which arise in the ordinary course of business. The
Company is also subject to certain environmental claims. While the outcome of
these claims cannot be predicted with certainty, Management does not believe
that the outcome of any of these legal matters will have a material adverse
effect on the Company's consolidated results of operations, financial position
or cash flows.
ITEM 2 - Changes in Securities
None
ITEM 3 - Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
ITEM 4 - Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
ITEM 5 - Other Information
None
ITEM 6 - Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K
EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION
---------- -----------
3.1 Articles of Incorporation of The Great Atlantic &
Pacific Tea Company, as amended through July 1987
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(a)
to Form 10-K filed on May 27, 1988)
3.2 By-Laws of The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea
Company, Inc., as amended through July 2, 2002
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2
to Form 10-K filed on July 5, 2002)
4.1 Indenture, dated as of January 1, 1991 between
the Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank (formerly The
Chase Manhattan Bank as successor by merger to
Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company), as trustee
(the "Indenture") (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K)
4.2 First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
December 4, 2001, to the Indenture, dated as of
January 1, 1991 between the Company and JPMorgan
Chase Bank, relating to the 7.70% Senior Notes
due 2004 (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on December 4,
2001)
4.3 Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of
December 20, 2001, to the Indenture between the
Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank, relating to the
9 1/8% Senior Notes due 2011 (incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on
December 20, 2001)
10.1 Employment Agreement, made and entered into as of
the 8th day of January, 2001, by and between the
Company and Elizabeth R. Culligan (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10 to Form 10-Q
filed on January 16, 2001) ("Culligan Agreement")
10.2 Amendment to Culligan Agreement dated April 8,
2002 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10.3 to Form 10-K filed on July 5, 2002)
10.3 Employment Agreement dated December 6, 1994,
between the Company and Fred Corrado
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10
to Form 10-K filed on May 24, 1995)
10.4 Amendment to Fred Corrado Employment Agreement
dated February 22, 2002 (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Form 10-K filed on
July 5, 2002)
10.5 Employment Agreement, made and entered into as of
the 1st day of November, 2000, by and between the
Company and William P. Costantini (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10 to Form 10-Q
filed on January 16, 2001) ("Costantini
Agreement")
10.6 Amendment to Costantini Agreement dated April 30,
2002 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10.7 to Form 10-K filed on July 5, 2002)
10.7 Employment Agreement, made and entered into as of
the 24th day of February, 2002, by and between
the Company and Mitchell P. Goldstein
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8
to Form 10-K filed on July 5, 2002)
10.8 Employment Agreement, made and entered into
as of the 1st day of November, 2000, by and
between the Company and Nicholas Ioli, Jr.
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10
to Form 10-Q filed on January 16, 2001)
10.9 Amendment to Nicholas Ioli Employment Agreement
dated April 3, 2002 (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Form 10-K filed on
July 5, 2002)
10.10 Employment Agreement, made and entered into as of
the 1st day of November, 2000, by and between the
Company and Laurane Magliari (incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 10 to Form 10-Q filed on
January 16, 2001) ("Magliari Agreement")
10.11 Amendment to Magliari Agreement dated April 30,
2002 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10.12 to Form 10-K filed on July 5, 2002)
10.12 Employment Agreement, made and entered into as of
the 14th day of May, 2001, by and between the
Company and John E. Metzger as amended February
14, 2002 (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.13 to Form 10-K filed on July 5, 2002)
10.13 Employment Agreement, made and entered into as of
the 25th day of February, 2002 by and between the
Company and David A. Smithies (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to Form 10-K
filed on July 5, 2002)
10.14 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan effective
as of September 30, 1991 (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.B to Form 10-K filed on
May 28, 1993)
10.15 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan effective
as of September 1, 1997 (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.B to Form 10-K filed on
May 27, 1998)
10.16 Supplemental Retirement and Benefit Restoration
Plan effective as of January 1, 2001
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10(j) to Form 10-K filed on May 23, 2001)
10.17 1994 Stock Option Plan (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10(e) to Form 10-K filed on
May 24, 1995)
10.18 1994 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee
Directors (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10(f) to Form 10-K filed on May 24, 1995)
10.19 Directors' Deferred Payment Plan adopted May 1,
1996 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10(h) to Form 10-K filed on May 16, 1997)
10.20 1998 Long Term Incentive and Share Award Plan
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10(k) to Form 10-K filed on May 19, 1999)
10.21 Credit Agreement dated as of February 23, 2001,
among the Company, The Great Atlantic & Pacific
Company of Canada, Limited and the other
Borrowers party hereto and the Lenders party
hereto, The Chase Manhattan Bank, as U.S.
Administrative Agent, and The Chase Manhattan
Bank of Canada, as Canadian Administrative Agent
("Credit Agreement") (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10 to Form 10-K filed on May
23, 2001)
10.22 Amendment No. 1 and Waiver, dated as of November
16, 2001 to Credit Agreement (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to Form 10-K
filed on July 5, 2002)
10.23 Amendment No. 2 dated as of March 21, 2002 to
Credit Agreement (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.24 to Form 10-K filed on
July 5, 2002)
10.24 Amendment No. 3 dated as of April 23, 2002 to
Credit Agreement (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.25 to Form 10-K filed on
July 5, 2002)
10.25 Waiver dated as of June 14, 2002 to Credit
Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.26 to Form 10-K filed on July 5, 2002)
10.26 Employment Agreement, made and entered into as
of the 2nd day of October, 2002 by and between
the Company and Peter Jueptner, as filed herein
10.27 Amendment No. 4 dated as of October 10, 2002 to
Credit Agreement as filed
herein
15 Independent Auditors' Consent (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 23 to Form 10-K
filed on July 5, 2002)
24 Not Applicable
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
On September 18, 2002, the Company filed a report on Form 8-K disclosing that on
September 11, 2002, the Board of Directors of the Company, based upon the
recommendation of the Company's Audit Committee, dismissed Deloitte & Touche LLP
(D&T) as its independent auditors, and engaged PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to
serve as the Company's new independent auditors for fiscal 2002.
On September 24, 2002, the Company filed a Form 8-K/A, amending its Form 8-K
filed on September 18, 2002. The Form 8-K/A was comprised solely of Exhibit
16.2, a revised letter from D&T to the Company, which broadened the breadth of
D&T's concurrence with certain statements made by the Company in its Form 8-K
filed on September 18, 2002.
The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.
SIGNATURES
- ----------
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC.
Dated: October 21, 2002 By: /s/ Brenda M. Galgano
-------------------------------
Brenda M. Galgano, Vice President, Corporate
Controller (Chief Accounting Officer)
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Section 302 Certification
I, Christian W.E. Haub, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Great Atlantic &
Pacific Tea Company, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.
/s/ Christian W.E. Haub Date: October 21, 2002
- -----------------------
Christian W. E. Haub
Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
Section 302 Certification
I, Mitchell P. Goldstein, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Great Atlantic &
Pacific Tea Company, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.
/s/ Mitchell P. Goldstein Date: October 21, 2002
- -------------------------
Mitchell P. Goldstein
Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
Certification Accompanying Periodic Report
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. ss. 1350)
The undersigned, Christian W.E. Haub, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. ("Company"), and
Mitchell P. Goldstein, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, each hereby certifies that (1) the Quarterly Report of the Company on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 7, 2002 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company.
Dated: October 21, 2002 /s/ Christian W.E. Haub
-----------------------
Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer
Dated: October 21, 2002 /s/ Mitchell P. Goldstein
-------------------------
Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer