UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-K
x |
ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 |
For
the fiscal year ended December
31, 2004
Commission
File No.
0-13295
CATERPILLAR
FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION
(Exact
name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
37-1105865 |
(State
of incorporation) |
(IRS
Employer I.D. No.) |
2120
West End Ave.
Nashville,
Tennessee |
37203-0001 |
(Address
of principal executive offices) |
(Zip
Code) |
Registrant's
telephone number, including area code:
(615) 341-1000
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title
of each class |
Exchange |
8.95%
Notes due March 2005 |
New
York Stock Exchange |
9.50%
Notes due February 2007 |
New
York Stock Exchange |
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
The
Registrant is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Caterpillar Inc. and meets the
conditions set forth in General Instruction (I)(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K, and
is therefore filing this form with the reduced disclosure
format.
Indicate
by a check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.
Yes
x
No o
Indicate
by a check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K.
Not
applicable x
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Act).
Yes
o
No x
At
February 23, 2005, one share of common stock of the Registrant was outstanding,
which is owned by Caterpillar Inc.
CONTENTS
Caterpillar
Financial Services Corporation, a Delaware corporation organized in 1981
(together with its subsidiaries, "Cat Financial"), is a wholly owned finance
subsidiary of Caterpillar Inc. (together with its other subsidiaries,
"Caterpillar" or "Cat"). Our primary business is to provide retail-financing
alternatives for Caterpillar products to customers and Caterpillar dealers
around the world. Such retail financing is primarily comprised of financing of
Caterpillar equipment, machinery, and engines. In addition, we also provide
financing for vehicles, power generation facilities, and marine vessels that, in
most cases, incorporate Caterpillar products. We also provide wholesale
financing to Caterpillar dealers and purchase short-term dealer receivables from
Caterpillar. We have over 20 years of experience in providing financing in these
markets, contributing to our knowledge of asset values, industry trends, product
structuring, and customer needs. We emphasize prompt and responsive service and
offer various financing plans to meet customer requirements, increase
Caterpillar sales, and generate financing revenue. Our total number of full-time
employees at December 31, 2004 was 1,399. For more detailed information on our
parent company, Caterpillar Inc., please visit http://www.cat.com. For more
information about our business, please visit http://www.catfinancial.com. Except
as expressly provided to the contrary in Part III. Item 14. of this filing,
information contained on Caterpillar Inc.'s and our Internet sites is not
incorporated by reference into this document.
Required
Securities and Exchange Commission filings are available as soon as reasonably
practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the Internet at
http://www.catfinancial.com. They also can be obtained without charge by writing
to: Legal Dept., Caterpillar Financial Services Corp., 2120 West End Ave.,
Nashville, Tennessee 37203-0001.
Retail
financing leases and installment sale contracts (total 58%*)
include:
· Tax
leases that are classified as either operating or finance leases for financial
accounting purposes, depending on the
characteristics
of the lease. For tax purposes, we are considered the owner of the equipment
(19%*).
· Finance
(non-tax) leases, where the lessee is considered the owner of the equipment
during the term of the lease,
that
either require or allow the customer to purchase the equipment for a fixed price
at the end of the term
(14%*).
· Installment
sale contracts, which are equipment loans that enable customers to purchase
equipment with a down
payment
or trade-in and structure payments over time (24%*).
· Governmental
lease-purchase plans in the U.S. that offer low interest rates and flexible
terms to qualified non-federal
government
agencies (1%*).
Retail
notes receivable:
· Loans
that allow customers and dealers to use their Caterpillar equipment as
collateral to obtain financing (20%*).
Wholesale
notes receivable, finance leases, and installment sale contracts (total 22%*)
include:
· Inventory/rental
programs which provide assistance to dealers by financing their inventory,
rental fleets, and rental
facilities
(6%*).
· |
Short-term
dealer receivables we purchase from Caterpillar at a discount
(16%*). |
*
Indicates the percentage of total portfolio at December 31, 2004. For more
information on the above and our concentration of credit risk, please refer to
Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
We define
total portfolio as total net finance receivables plus retained interests in
securitized wholesale receivables plus equipment on operating leases, less
accumulated depreciation.
The
retail financing business is highly competitive, with financing for users of
Caterpillar equipment available through a variety of sources, principally
commercial banks and finance and leasing companies. Cat Financial’s competitors
include CIT Group, Citibank, General Electric Capital Corporation, and local
banks. In addition, many of the manufacturers that compete with Caterpillar use
below-market interest rate programs (subsidized by the manufacturer) to assist
machine sales. Caterpillar and Cat Financial work together to provide a broad
array of financial merchandising programs around the world to meet these
competitive offers.
We
continue in our efforts to respond quickly to customers and improve internal
processing efficiencies. We believe our web-based Cat FinancExpressSM
transaction processing and information tool, currently available in the U.S.,
Australia, Canada, and France, gives us a competitive advantage in these areas.
Cat FinancExpressSM collects
information on-line to provide finance quotes and credit decisions, and then
prints documents, all in a very short time frame.
We are
largely dependent upon Caterpillar dealers' ability to sell equipment and
customers' willingness to enter into financing or leasing agreements with us. We
also are affected by the availability of funds from our financing sources and
general economic conditions such as inflation and market interest
rates.
We
provide financing only when acceptable criteria are met. Credit decisions are
based on, among other things, the customer's credit history, financial strength,
and intended use of equipment. We typically maintain a security interest in
retail financed equipment and require physical damage insurance coverage on
financed equipment.
In
certain instances, our operations are subject to supervision and regulation by
state, federal, and various foreign government authorities and may be subject to
various laws and judicial and administrative decisions imposing various
requirements and restrictions, which, among other things, (i) regulate credit
granting activities, (ii) establish maximum interest rates, finance charges, and
other charges, (iii) require disclosures to customers, (iv) govern secured
transactions, (v) set collection, foreclosure, repossession, and other trade
practices, (vi) prohibit discrimination in the extension of credit and
administration of loans, and (vii) regulate the use and reporting of information
related to borrower's credit experience.
We
continue to finance a significant portion of Caterpillar dealers' sales and
inventory of Cat equipment, especially in our North American segment (see Note
16 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information regarding
our segments and geographic areas). Our competitive position is improved by
marketing programs, subsidized by Caterpillar and/or Caterpillar dealers, which
allow us to offer below-market interest rates. The amount subsidized at the
outset of the transaction is recognized as revenue over the term of the
financing.
We also
have agreements with Caterpillar that are significant to our operation. These
agreements provide for financial support, certain funding, employee benefits,
and corporate services, among other things. For more information on these
agreements, please refer to Note 14 of Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Our
principal executive offices are located in Nashville, Tennessee. We have 43
offices, of which 8 are located in North America (6 in the United States and 2
in Canada), 20 are in Europe, 10 are in Asia-Pacific, and 5 are in Latin America
(see Note 16 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information
regarding our segments and geographic areas). All offices are
leased.
We are
party to various legal proceedings that arise in the normal course of our
business. Although the outcomes of these proceedings cannot be predicted with
certainty, we believe the final outcome of any single proceeding or all
proceedings in the aggregate would not have a material adverse effect on our
consolidated financial position or results of operations or cash
flows.
MATTERS,
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our stock
is not publicly traded. Caterpillar is the owner of our one outstanding share.
There were no cash dividends declared or paid to Caterpillar in 2004 or
2003.
PART II. ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS (DOLLARS
IN MILLIONS)
We
experienced strong growth in retail financing, demonstrating our ability to
respond to dealer and customer needs for competitive financing and good service
worldwide. The credit quality of our portfolio also continued to improve as
delinquent accounts reached a six year low.
· |
Revenues
were a record $1,924, an increase of $188 or 11% compared with the same
period last year. |
· |
Profit
after tax was $287, up $31 or 12% from a year ago. |
· |
New
retail financing was a record $9,948, an increase of $1,899 or 24% from
last year. |
· |
Past
dues over 30 days were 1.55% of total receivables plus retained interests
in wholesale receivables compared with 2.46% at December 31,
2003. |
· |
Write-offs
of bad debts exceeded recoveries by $72 during 2004 compared to $82 during
2003. |
The
preparation of financial statements, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America, requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts. The most significant
estimates include those related to our residual values for leased assets and for
our allowance for credit losses. Actual results may differ from these
estimates.
The
residual value, which is the estimated future wholesale market value of leased
equipment at the time of the expiration of the lease term, represents a careful
analysis of historical wholesale market sales prices, projected forward on a
level trend line without consideration for inflation or possible future pricing
action. At the inception of the lease, the residual value is derived from
consideration of the following critical factors: market size and demand, any
known significant market/product trends, total expected hours of usage, machine
configuration, application, location, model changes, quantities, and past
re-marketing experience. Many impact factors are gathered in an application
survey that is completed prior to quotation. The lease agreement also clearly
defines applicable return conditions and remedies for non-compliance, in order
to ensure that the leased equipment will be in good operating condition upon
return. Model changes and updates, as well as market strength and product
acceptance, are monitored, and residual adjustments are made in accordance with
the significance of any such changes. Remarketing sales staff works closely with
customers and dealers to manage the sale of lease returns and the recovery of
residual exposure. During the term of the leases, residual amounts are
monitored. If estimated market values significantly decline due to economic
factors, obsolescence, or other adverse circumstances, the residuals are
adjusted to the lower estimated values by a charge to earnings. For equipment on
operating leases, the charge is recognized through depreciation expense. For
finance leases, it is recognized through a reduction of finance revenue.
The
allowance for credit losses is evaluated on a regular basis and adjusted based
upon management's best estimate of probable losses inherent in our finance
receivables. In estimating probable losses, we review accounts that are past
due, non-performing, or in bankruptcy. We also review accounts that may be at
risk using information available about the customer, such as financial
statements, news reports, and published credit ratings. We also use general
information regarding industry trends and the general economic environment.
Using an estimate of current fair market value of collateral and factoring in
credit enhancements, such as additional collateral and third party guarantees,
we arrive at an estimated loss for specific accounts and estimate an additional
amount for the remainder of the finance receivables based upon historical
trends. Adverse economic conditions or other factors that might cause
deterioration of the financial health of our customers could change the timing
and level of payments received and thus necessitate a change in our estimated
losses.
REVENUES
Wholesale
revenue (including revenues related to retained interests in securitized
wholesale receivables) and retail finance revenue for 2004 was $1,062, an
increase of $110 from 2003. The increase was principally due to an 18% increase
in the average receivable plus the average retained interests in securitized
wholesale receivables balance outstanding, partially offset by a 36 basis point
decrease in the average interest rate. The average interest rate on these assets
was 5.93% for 2004 compared with 6.29% for 2003, including the average interest
rate on Notes receivable from Caterpillar. This rate is computed by dividing
wholesale plus retail finance revenue by the average asset balance, net of
unearned income.
Operating
lease revenue for 2004 was $722, or $61 higher than 2003 due to an increase in
equipment on operating leases that resulted from higher customer
demand.
Other
revenue for 2004 was $140, an increase of $17 from 2003. The increase was
primarily due to a $16 favorable change in gain (loss) on sale of equipment
returned from lease (mostly due to an improving market for used equipment), a
$10 favorable change in points on forward currency exchange contracts, and $4
higher income related to retained interests in securitized retail receivables.
The increases were partially offset by the absence of $9 of interest received in
2003 from Caterpillar Inc. related to prior years’ tax audit settlements and an
$8 decrease in gain on sale of receivables. Other revenue items for the years
ended December 31, included:
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Fees |
$31 |
|
$29 |
|
Late
charge income |
24 |
|
21 |
|
Gain
on sale (through securitization and syndication) of
receivables* |
20 |
|
28 |
|
Gain
(loss) on sale of equipment returned from lease |
15 |
|
(1) |
|
Dividend
income** |
14 |
|
16 |
|
Service
fee income on securitized receivables |
12 |
|
11 |
|
Income
related to retained interests in securitized retail
receivables |
11 |
|
7 |
|
Exchange
gain |
3 |
|
2 |
|
Partnership
income |
3 |
|
3 |
|
Points
on forward currency exchange contracts |
2 |
|
(8) |
|
Interest
from Caterpillar - intercompany effects of IRS audit
settlements |
- |
|
9 |
|
Miscellaneous
other revenue, net |
5 |
|
6 |
|
Total
other revenue |
$140 |
|
$123 |
|
*See Note
1(J) of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information on gain on
sale of securitized receivables.
** In
1st quarter
2001, we established a Canadian partnership with Finning International
Incorporated to support its entrance into the Cat Rental Store market in the
United Kingdom. In 4th quarter
2004, we dissolved the investment in this partnership with minimal impact to
profit. The balance of $335 at the end of 3rd quarter
2004 was included in Other assets on the Consolidated Statement of Financial
Position and accounted for under the cost method. Thus, we expect our dividend
income to decrease in future periods.
EXPENSES
Interest
expense for 2004 was $532, an increase of $49 from 2003. This increase was
primarily due to the impact of a 16% increase in average debt levels to fund new
finance receivables, retained interests in securitized wholesale receivables
during the year, and operating leases, partially offset by the reduction in the
average cost of funds of 16 basis points, to 2.98% for 2004 from 3.14% for 2003.
Depreciation
expense on equipment leased to others was $575, up $48 over 2003 due to the
increase in operating leases discussed in the Revenues section
above.
General,
operating, and administrative expenses were $279 during 2004 compared to $240 in
2003. The increase principally resulted from increased labor costs to support
growth in earning assets and due to inflation. There were 1,399 full-time
employees at December 31, 2004, an increase of 117 from December 31,
2003.
The
provision for credit losses increased from $101 in 2003 to $105 in 2004. The
allowance for credit losses was 1.38% of finance receivables, net of unearned
income, plus retained interests in securitized wholesale receivables at December
31, 2004, compared to 1.49% at December 31, 2003. The decrease in the allowance
as a percentage of finance receivables reflects our continued decrease in past
due receivables, coupled with an overall improvement in general economic
conditions. The Notes receivable from Caterpillar are not included in this
calculation.
The
effective tax rate increased from 31.9% for 2003 to 32.3% for 2004. The increase
from 2003 is primarily attributable to a change in the geographic mix of
profits, partially offset by a reduction in state income tax liabilities due to
adjustments for cumulative changes in state tax rates, changes in company
structure, and changes in geographic dispersion of the company’s business and
customers.
PROFIT
Profit
for 2004 was $287, up $31 from 2003.
On a
pre-tax basis, profit was up $48 from 2003. Of the increase, $101 resulted from
growth in earning assets, $16 from the
favorable change in gain (loss) on sale of equipment returned from lease, and
$10 from a favorable change in points on forward exchange contracts. These items
were substantially offset by $39 of
higher
operating expenses, $27
from a decrease in the interest rate spread, the absence of $9 interest received
in 2003 from Caterpillar Inc. related to prior years’ tax audit settlements, and
an $8 decrease in gain on sale of receivables.
ASSETS
Total
assets were $23,572 at December 31, 2004, an increase of $3,581 from December
31, 2003, principally due to growth in finance receivables (retail and
wholesale).
During
2004, we financed record new retail business of $9,948, compared to $8,049 in
2003. The increase of $1,899 was primarily related to increased financing in our
North America segment.
SECURITIZED
AND SYNDICATED ASSETS
We also
manage and service receivables that have been sold through securitization or
syndication. These receivables are not available to pay our creditors (see Note
4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further
information).
Off-balance
sheet securitized receivables at December 31, were as follows:
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Wholesale
receivables securitized |
$
- |
* |
$1,790 |
|
Less:
Retained interests in securitized wholesale receivables |
- |
|
1,550 |
|
Off-balance-sheet
securitized wholesale receivables |
$
- |
|
$
240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installment
sale contracts securitized |
$767 |
|
$746 |
|
Finance
leases securitized |
48 |
|
67 |
|
Less:
retained interests (included in Other assets) |
73 |
|
73 |
|
Off-balance-sheet
securitized retail receivables |
$742 |
|
$740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* See
Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information on the
decrease in the securitized wholesale receivables amount.
Syndicated
receivables at December 31, were as follows:
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
Finance
leases |
$48 |
|
$ - |
Installment
sale contracts |
9 |
|
- |
Operating
leases |
2 |
|
- |
Total
syndicated receivables |
$59 |
|
$ - |
PAST
DUE RECEIVABLES PLUS RETAINED INTERESTS IN SECURITIZED WHOLESALE
RECEIVABLES
Finance
receivables (excluding Notes receivable from Caterpillar) plus retained
interests in securitized wholesale receivables plus rents receivable for
operating leases (included in Other assets) that were past due over 30 days were
1.55% of these assets at December 31, 2004 compared to 2.46% at December 31,
2003. The improvement was due to improved performance across all segments,
particularly in North America and Diversified Services, where past dues improved
..90 and 1.23 percentage points, respectively.
Bad debt
write-offs, net of recoveries, were $72 for 2004 compared with $82 for 2003. We
will continue to monitor the allowance for credit losses to provide for an
amount we believe is adequate, after considering the value of any collateral, to
cover uncollectible receivables. See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements for information on the allowance for credit losses.
REVENUES
Wholesale
revenue (including revenues related to retained interests in securitized
wholesale receivables) and retail finance revenue for 2003 was $952, a decrease
of $19 from 2002. The decrease was principally due to an 83 basis point decrease
in the average interest rate, mostly offset by an 11% increase in the average
receivable plus the average retained interests in securitized wholesale
receivables balance outstanding. The average interest rate on these assets was
6.29% for 2003 compared with 7.12% for 2002, which includes the average interest
rate on Notes receivable from Caterpillar. This rate is computed by dividing
wholesale plus retail finance revenue by the average asset balance, net of
unearned income.
Operating
lease revenue for 2003 was $661, or $122 higher than 2002 due to the increase in
equipment on operating leases that resulted from higher customer
demand.
Other
revenue for 2003 was $123, an increase of $51 from 2002. The increase was
primarily due to increased fees (commitment/buyout fees $4, dealer guarantee
fees $4, and documentation fees $2), a favorable change in loss on the sale of
equipment returned from lease, interest from Caterpillar Inc. related to the
intercompany effects of an audit settlement with the Internal Revenue Service
for several prior tax years, and increased income related to retained interests
in securitized retail receivables. Other revenue items for the years ended
December 31, included:
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Fees |
$ 29 |
|
$ 19 |
|
Gain
on sale of receivables * |
28 |
|
31 |
|
Late
charge fees |
21 |
|
19 |
|
Dividend
income |
16 |
|
11 |
|
Service
fee income on securitized receivables |
11 |
|
10 |
|
Interest
from Caterpillar - intercompany effects of IRS audit
settlements |
9 |
|
- |
|
Income
(loss) related to retained interests in securitized retail
receivables |
7 |
|
(1 |
) |
Partnership
income |
3 |
|
7 |
|
Exchange
gain (loss) |
2 |
|
(5 |
) |
Points
on forward exchange contracts |
(8 |
) |
(13 |
) |
Loss
on sale of equipment returned from lease |
(1 |
) |
(10 |
) |
Miscellaneous
other revenue, net |
6 |
|
4 |
|
Total
other revenue |
$123 |
|
$72 |
|
*See Note
1(J) of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information on gain on
sale of receivables.
EXPENSES
Interest
expense for 2003 was $483, a decrease of $61 from 2002. This decrease was
primarily due to the reduction in the average cost of funds of 76 basis points,
to 3.14% for 2003 from 3.90% for 2002, partially offset by the impact of a 10%
increase in average debt levels that was due to an increase in new finance
receivables, retained interests in securitized wholesale receivables, and
operating leases.
Depreciation
expense on equipment leased to others was $527, up $112 over 2002 due to the
increase in operating leases discussed in the Revenues section
above.
General,
operating, and administrative expenses increased to $240 in 2003 compared to
$202 in 2002. This increase primarily resulted from increased employment and
investments in technology to support the growth in total assets during 2003 and
to develop infrastructure to support future growth initiatives. There were 1,282
employees at December 31, 2003, an increase of 67 from December 31,
2002.
The
provision for credit losses decreased from $109 in 2002 to $101 in 2003. The
allowance for credit losses was 1.49% of finance receivables plus retained
interests in securitized wholesale receivables, net of unearned income, at
December 31, 2003, compared to 1.47% at December 31, 2002. The Notes receivable
from Caterpillar are not included in this calculation.
The
effective tax rate decreased from 36.3% for 2002 to 31.9% for 2003. The decrease
from 20022002 is
attributable to our foreign subsidiaries that are subject to tax rates other
than the statutory U.S. rate (see Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements for more information).
PROFIT
Profit
for 2003 was $256, up $63 from 2002. Of the increase in profit, $59 million was
due to growth in assets and $38 million to increases in Other revenue, as
discussed in the Revenues section above, partially offset by $38 million higher
general, operating, and administrative expenses.
ASSETS
Total
assets were $19,991 at December 31, 2003, an increase of $2,886 over December
31, 2002, primarily due to additions exceeding collections on finance
receivables (wholesale and retail) and retained interests in securitized
wholesale receivables.
During
2003, we financed then record new retail business of $8,049, compared to $7,287
in 2002. The increase of $762 was primarily related to increased financing in
our Europe and North America segments.
At
December 31, 2003, we also serviced $1,053 in receivables sold to others, which
consisted of $240 in wholesale receivables under revolving, asset-backed
securitization agreements, $746 of installment sale contracts, and $67 of
finance leases. These receivables are not available to pay our
creditors.
PAST
DUE RECEIVABLES PLUS RETAINED INTERESTS IN SECURITIZED WHOLESALE
RECEIVABLES
Finance
receivables plus retained interests in securitized wholesale receivables plus
rents receivable for operating leases (included in Other assets) that were past
due over 30 days were 2.46% of the total such assets at December 31, 2003
compared to 3.55% at December 31, 2002. In the Diversified Services segment,
there was a $103 reduction in past due receivables (primarily from restructuring
two accounts for which payments have been made in accordance with the
restructuring agreements). At the same time, the finance receivables plus
retained interests in securitized wholesale receivables plus rents receivable
grew $2,479, primarily in the Europe and North America segments.
Bad debt
write-offs, net of recoveries, were $82 for 2003 compared with $85 for 2002. We
will continue to monitor the allowance for credit losses to provide for an
amount we believe is adequate, after considering the value of any collateral, to
cover uncollectible receivables. See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements for information on the allowance for credit losses.
Operations
for 2004 were funded with a combination of borrowings, proceeds from sales of
receivables, and retained earnings. We do not generate material funding through
structured finance transactions.
As an
alternative funding source, we securitize assets. In this process, retail or
wholesale finance receivables are sold to special purpose bankruptcy-remote
subsidiaries. We receive proceeds from subsequent sales of dealer receivables
into a revolving securitization facility and for retail installment sale
contracts and finance leases sold into a public asset-backed securitization
facility. Please refer to Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
for additional information.
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
Dealer
Receivables |
|
|
Finance
Receivables |
|
|
Dealer
Receivables |
|
|
Finance
Receivables |
|
|
Dealer
Receivables |
|
|
Finance
Receivables |
|
Total
proceeds from initial sales of receivables* |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
659 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
693 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
641 |
|
Total
proceeds from collections reinvested in revolving
securitization |
|
$ |
663 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
1,099 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
1,696 |
|
$ |
- |
|
*Proceeds
from the initial sales of receivables include cash proceeds and retained
interests (see Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more
information).
During
2004, we began selling retail leases and installment sale contracts through
syndications where the investors have limited or no recourse to us (see Note 11
of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statement for more information). We received
$61 of proceeds from the sale of such contracts.
Total
outstanding borrowings. Total
borrowings outstanding at December 31, 2004 were $20,029, an increase of $3,017
over December 31, 2003 due to financing a higher amount of assets. Outstanding
borrowings at December 31, 2004
consisted
of:
$13,987
of medium-term notes
$ 4,372
of commercial paper
$ 482 of
variable denomination floating rate demand notes
$ 370 of
short-term bank borrowings
$ 333 of
notes payable to Caterpillar
$ 240 of
collateralized trust obligation
$ 237 of
long-term bank borrowings
$ 8 of
loans from a company-owned partnership
Of the
$4,372 of commercial paper, $399 has a built-in feature to extend the maturity a
maximum of 390 days from the initial issue date.
Revolving
credit lines. We
participate in two global credit facilities with a syndicate of banks totaling
$5,000 available in the aggregate to both Caterpillar and Cat Financial to
support commercial paper programs. Based on management's allocation decision,
which can be revised at any time, the portion of the facility available to Cat
Financial at December 31, 2004 was $4,400. The five-year facility of $2,500
expires in September 2009. The 364-day facility of $2,500 expires in September
2005 and contains a provision that allows Caterpillar or Cat Financial to obtain
a one-year loan for up to the full amount of that facility in September 2005
that would mature in September 2006.
In
addition to the syndicated global credit facilities, we also have an A$50 (USD
equivalent = $39) credit facility with one bank to support our Australian
subsidiary's commercial paper program.
At
December 31, 2004, there were no borrowings under these lines, and we were in
compliance with all debt covenants, except our debt-to-equity ratio, as defined
under the revolving credit facilities, which was 8.23 to 1 at December 31, 2004.
By covenant, this is not to exceed 8.00 to 1 at year-end (8.5 to 1
on a moving six-month average at other than year-end). The
higher year-end ratio was primarily the result of unexpected record levels of
financing activity in the 4th quarter,
particularly in December. We have received a year-end leverage covenant waiver
from our banks and expect to be in compliance with all revolving credit
agreement covenants throughout 2005. During the year, Caterpillar did not
contribute any additional capital to Cat Financial. See Note 7 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Short-term
credit lines from banks. These
credit lines total $1,052 and will be eligible for renewal at various future
dates or have no specified expiration date. They are used for local bank
borrowings of subsidiaries. At December 31, 2004, we had $370 outstanding
against these credit lines compared to $183 at December 31, 2003.
Variable
amount lending agreements with Caterpillar. Under
these agreements, we may borrow up to $1,650 from Caterpillar, and Caterpillar
may borrow up to $1,239 from us. The agreements are in effect for indefinite
periods of time and may be changed or terminated by either party with 30 days
notice. We had notes payable of $333 and notes receivable of $120 outstanding
under these agreements at December 31, 2004, compared to notes payable of $475
and notes receivable of $378 outstanding at December 31, 2003.
Contractual
obligations. We have
committed cash outflow related to long-term debt, operating lease agreements,
and purchase agreements. Minimum payments for these obligations
are:
|
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
After
2009 |
Total |
Long-term
debt |
$3,519 |
$4,130 |
$2,560 |
$1,127 |
$1,695 |
$1,201 |
$14,232 |
Interest
payable on long-term debt |
408 |
288 |
194 |
130 |
72 |
192 |
1,284 |
Operating
leases |
13 |
12 |
11 |
11 |
10 |
43 |
100 |
Purchase
obligations |
206 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
206 |
Total
contractual obligations |
$4,146 |
$4,430 |
$2,765 |
$1,268 |
$1,777 |
$1,436 |
$15,822 |
These
contractual obligations do not include unused commitments and lines of credit
for dealers and customers discussed in Note 11 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Off-balance
sheet arrangements. We did
not have guarantee contingent liabilities with at least a reasonably likely
chance of occurrence at December 31, 2004. Please refer to Note 11 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on our guarantee
contingent liabilities. Also, we lease all our facilities rather than acquire
them, where the acquisition would require us to recognize a liability for the
financing. The above table shows our minimum payments for operating leases of
offices and other property.
To
maintain an alternative funding source, we periodically (generally once a year)
securitize retail installment sale contracts and finance leases. In this
process, these finance receivables are sold into a public asset-backed
securitization trust. The investors and the securitization trusts have no
recourse to us for failure of debtors to pay when due. The trusts, bankruptcy
remote qualified special purpose entities (QSPEs) that are not consolidated in
our financial statements, held total assets of $815 related to these
securitizations at year-end 2004 ($813 at year-end 2003). We use QSPEs in a
manner consistent with conventional practices in the securitization industry to
isolate these finance receivables, which are secured by new and used equipment,
for the benefit of securitization investors. Our sensitivity
analysis indicated that the impact of a 20% adverse change in individual
assumptions used to calculate the fair value of all our retained interests at
December 31, 2004 would be less than $2 (less than $2 at December 31, 2003).
The use
of the QSPEs enables us to access the U.S. securitization market for the sale of
these types of financial assets. The amounts of funding from securitizations
reflect such factors as capital market accessibility, relative costs of funding
sources, and assets available for securitization. In 2004, we had total proceeds
from initial sales of these receivables of $659 ($693 in 2003) and recognized a
pre-tax gain of $13 ($22 in 2003). Subordinated retained interests in the public
securitizations from current and earlier years totaled $73 at year-end 2004 and
2003.
We also utilize a revolving securitization structure whereby eligible dealer
receivables purchased from Caterpillar are initially securitized into a trust.
The trust subsequently issues a certificate collateralized by a portion of these
dealer receivables to third party purchasers with a corresponding reduction in
our retained interests in the trust. The trust was a QSPE and thus was not
consolidated in 2003. Due to a high volume of dealer receivable financing
activity in 2004, we held more than 90% of the beneficial interest of the trust
in the form of retained interests. Thus, in accordance with the provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standard 140 (SFAS 140) “Accounting
for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of
Liabilities”, we are
consolidating the trust in 2004. In 2003, because the trust was not
consolidated, the outstanding principal balance of the collateralized
certificate was not included in our Consolidated Statement of Financial
Position. The balance of retained interests in securitized wholesale receivables
was $1,550 at year-end 2003. Due to the short-term nature of the retained
interests, carrying amount approximated fair value.
Cash
flows. Net cash
provided by operating activities was $783, an increase of $179 from
2003, primarily
due to the increase in profit adjusted for non-cash items of $97 and a decrease
in the use of cash of $65 for various receivables from customers and others. Net
cash used for investing activities increased from $2,122 in 2003 to $3,212 in
2004 mostly due to greater additions, net of collections, related to finance
receivables plus retained interests in securitized wholesale receivables of
$1,434 and due to less proceeds from sales of receivables of $397, partially
offset by the net change in cash flows related to the Notes receivable from
Caterpillar of $297 and flows related to Investment in partnerships of $282
(principally related to the 4th quarter
2004 receipt related to dissolving the Canadian partnership with Finning; funds
were used to pay down debt). Net cash provided by financing activities was
$2,449, an increase of $969 from 2003, due to a decrease in payments on
long-term debt of $802, an increase in short-term borrowings of $405, and the
net change in cash flows related to Payable to Caterpillar -borrowings of $217,
partially offset by a decrease in proceeds from long-term debt of $455.
We use
interest rate derivative financial instruments and currency derivative financial
instruments to manage interest rate and foreign currency exchange risks that we
encounter as a part of our normal business. We do not use these instruments for
trading purposes.
Interest
rate derivatives. We have a
match funding objective whereby the interest rate profile (fixed rate or
floating rate) of our debt is matched to the interest rate profile of our
portfolio within certain parameters. In pursuing this objective, we use interest
rate swap agreements to modify the structure of the debt. Match funding assists
us in maintaining our interest rate spreads, regardless of the direction
interest rates move.
In the
normal course of business, our operations and financial position are subject to
fluctuations in interest rates. We use interest rate swap agreements to manage
this risk and maintain the spread between interest-bearing assets and
liabilities. To estimate the impact of interest rate movement on our income, we
compute a "baseline" and "shocked" interest expense over the next 12 months. The
difference between the "baseline" and "shocked" amounts is an estimate of our
sensitivity to interest rate movement.
We
determine the "baseline" interest expense by applying a market interest rate to
the unhedged portion of our debt. The unhedged portion of our debt is an
estimate of fixed rate assets funded by floating rate liabilities. We
incorporate the effects of interest rate swap agreements in the estimate of our
unhedged debt. We determine the "shocked" interest expense by adding 100 basis
points to the market interest rate applied to "baseline" interest expense and
apply this rate to the unhedged debt.
Based on
our sensitivity analysis, assuming no new fixed-rate assets funded by floating
rate liabilities were extended and no further action was taken to alter our
current interest rate sensitivity, the impact of a 100 basis point rise in
interest rates is an estimated $13 increase to interest expense for 2005. The
estimated impact for 2004 was $18. Although we believe this measure provides a
meaningful estimate of our interest rate sensitivity, it does not adjust for
other factors that impact our interest expense. Accordingly, no assurance can be
given that actual results would be consistent with the results of our estimate.
Our analysis does not necessarily represent our current outlook of future market
interest rate movement.
Foreign
currency derivatives. Since
our policy for our operations is to hedge the foreign exchange risk when the
currency of our debt does not match the currency of our portfolio and other
receivables, a 10% change in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to all other
currencies would not have a material effect on our consolidated financial
position, results of operations, or cash flow. Neither our policy nor the effect
of a 10% change in the value of the U.S. dollar has changed from that reported
at the end of last year.
Information
required by Item 8 is included following the Report of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm.
Conclusion
Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and
Procedures
Under the
supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief
executive officer and our chief financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of
our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Exchange
Act Rule 13a-15(e). Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer and
our chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this filing.
The
management of Cat Financial is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control over
financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes
those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records
that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and
dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts
and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our
management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding
prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition
of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Management assessed the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December
31, 2004. In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in
Internal
Control — Integrated Framework. Based
on our assessment we concluded that, as of December 31, 2004, our internal
control over financial reporting was effective based on those
criteria.
Our
management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 has been audited by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm.
Their report appears immediately following Management’s Report on Internal
Control over Financial Reporting.
As a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Caterpillar Inc., our principal accountant fees and
services are subject to Caterpillar Inc.'s Audit Committee pre-approval policies
and procedures described in its Proxy. This Proxy can be located at
www.cat.com/about_cat/investor_information/05_SEC_filings/SEC_filings.html.
Other than these policies and procedures, the information contained at this site
is not incorporated by reference in this filing. During 2004, all services
provided by the external auditor were pre-approved by Caterpillar’s Audit
Committee in accordance with such policy.
Fees paid
to Cat Financial auditors' firms were comprised of the following (in
millions):
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Audit
Fees |
$ 3.0 |
|
$ 1.7 |
|
Tax
Fees 1 |
.1 |
|
.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
$ 3.1 |
|
$ 1.8 |
|
1 "Tax
Fees" include, among other things, tax return preparation and review and
advising on the impact of changes in local tax laws.
(a)
The
following documents are filed as part of this report.
1.
Financial Statements
· Report of
Independent Auditors
· Consolidated
Statement of Financial Position
· Consolidated
Statement of Profit
· Consolidated
Statement of Changes in Stockholder's Equity
· Consolidated
Statement of Cash Flows
· Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(b)
Exhibits
3.1 |
Certificate
of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated by reference from Exhibit
3.1 to the Company's Form 10, as amended, Commission File No.
0-13295). |
3.2 |
Bylaws
of the Company (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.2 to the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31,
1990, Commission File No. 0-13295). |
4.1 |
Indenture,
dated as of April 15, 1985, between the Company and Morgan Guaranty Trust
Company of New York, as Trustee, including form of Debt Security (see
Table of Contents to Indenture) (incorporated by reference from Exhibit
4.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-3, Commission File
No. 33-2246). |
4.2 |
First
Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 22, 1986, amending the Indenture
dated as of April 15, 1985 between the Company and Morgan Guaranty Trust
Company of New York, as Trustee (incorporated by reference from Exhibit
4.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 1986, Commission File No. 0-13295). |
4.3 |
Second
Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 15, 1987, amending the Indenture
dated as of April 15, 1985 between the Company and Morgan Guaranty Trust
Company of New York, as Trustee (incorporated by reference from Exhibit
4.3 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 24, 1987,
Commission File No. 0-13295). |
4.4 |
Third
Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 2, 1989, amending the
Indenture dated as of April 15, 1985, between the Company and Morgan
Guaranty Trust Company of New York, as Trustee (incorporated by reference
from Exhibit 4.3 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, dated
October 16, 1989, Commission File No. 0-13295). |
4.5 |
Fourth
Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 1, 1990, amending the
Indenture dated April 15, 1985, between the Company and Morgan Guaranty
Trust Company of New York, as Trustee (incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 4.3 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, dated October 29,
1990, Commission File No. 0-13295). |
4.6 |
Indenture,
dated as of July 15, 1991, between the Company and Continental Bank,
National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference from Exhibit
4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, dated July 25, 1991,
Commission File No. 0-13295). |
4.7 |
Support
Agreement, dated as of December 21, 1984, between the Company and
Caterpillar (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.2 to the Company's
Form 10, as amended, Commission File No. 0-13295). |
4.8
|
First
Amendment to the Support Agreement dated June 14, 1995 between the Company
and Caterpillar (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4 to the Company's
Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 14, 1995, Commission File No.
0-13295). |
10.1 |
Tax
Sharing Agreement, dated as of June 21, 1984, between the Company and
Caterpillar (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's
Form 10, as amended, Commission File No. 0-13295). |
12 |
Statement
Setting Forth Computation of Ratio of Profit to Fixed Charges of
Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation and
subsidiaries. |
23 |
Consent
of Registered Public Accounting Firm. |
31 |
Certification
of James S. Beard, President, Director, and Chief Executive Officer of
Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation, and Edward J. Scott, Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Caterpillar Financial
Services Corporation, as required pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32 |
Certification
of James S. Beard, President, Director, and Chief Executive Officer of
Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation, and Edward J. Scott, Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Caterpillar Financial
Services Corporation, as required pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Caterpillar
Financial Services Corporation |
(Registrant) |
Dated:
February 24, 2005 |
By:
/s/ Michael G. Sposato |
|
Michael
G. Sposato, Secretary |
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Company and in the
capacities and on the dates indicated.
Date |
Signature |
Title |
|
|
|
February
24, 2005 |
/s/
James S. Beard
James
S. Beard |
President,
Director, and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
February
24, 2005 |
/s/
Steven H. Wunning
Steven
H. Wunning |
Director |
|
|
|
February
24, 2005 |
/s/
Edward J. Scott
Edward
J. Scott |
Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
February
24, 2005 |
/s/
Steven R. Elsesser
Steven
R. Elsesser |
Controller
|
|
|
|
The
management
of Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation (the “Company”) is responsible for
establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting.
Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial
reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the
maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect
the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of
the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or
timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management
assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2004. In making this assessment, we used the
criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission in Internal
Control - Integrated Framework. Based
on our assessment we concluded that, as of December 31, 2004, the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those
criteria.
Our
management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 has been audited by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as
stated in their report which immediately follows this report.
To the
Board of Directors and Stockholder of Caterpillar Financial Services
Corporation:
We have
completed an integrated audit of Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation’s
2004 consolidated financial statements and of its internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 and audits of its 2003 and 2002
consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Our opinions, based on our
audits, are presented below.
Consolidated
financial statements
In our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the index appearing
under Item 15(a)(1) present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation and its subsidiaries at
December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004 in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits. We
conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit of
financial statements includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Internal
control over financial reporting
Also, in
our opinion, management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that the Company maintained
effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004
based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO),
is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on those criteria.
Furthermore, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects,
effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2004, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework
issued by COSO. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our
responsibility is to express opinions on management’s assessment and on the
effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based
on our audits. We conducted our audit of internal control over financial
reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective
internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. An audit of internal control over financial reporting includes
obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting,
evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and
operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other
procedures as we consider necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A
company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over
financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain
to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;
(ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of
the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management
and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance
regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or
disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Peoria,
Illinois
February
24,
2005
Caterpillar
Financial Services Corporation
At
December 31,
(Dollars
in Millions, except share data)
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2002 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
98 |
|
$ |
69 |
|
$ |
100 |
|
Finance
receivables (Notes 2 and 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail
notes receivable |
|
|
4,580 |
|
|
4,372 |
|
|
3,979 |
|
Wholesale
notes receivable |
|
|
4,789 |
|
|
1,674 |
|
|
1,553 |
|
Notes
receivable from Caterpillar (Note 14) |
|
|
120 |
|
|
378 |
|
|
335 |
|
Finance
leases and installment sale contracts - Retail |
|
|
11,769 |
|
|
9,510 |
|
|
8,292 |
|
Finance
leases and installment sale contracts - Wholesale |
|
|
185 |
|
|
159 |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
21,443 |
|
|
16,093 |
|
|
14,288 |
|
Less:
Unearned income |
|
|
1,261 |
|
|
1,046 |
|
|
995 |
|
Allowance
for credit losses |
|
|
278 |
|
|
241 |
|
|
207 |
|
Total
net finance receivables |
|
|
19,904 |
|
|
14,806 |
|
|
13,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained
interests in securitized wholesale receivables (Note 4) |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,550 |
|
|
1,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment
on operating leases, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
less
accumulated depreciation (Note 5) |
|
|
2,569 |
|
|
2,319 |
|
|
1,961 |
|
Deferred
income taxes (Note 12) |
|
|
28 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
11 |
|
Other
assets |
|
|
973 |
|
|
1,228 |
|
|
802 |
|
Total
assets |
|
$ |
23,572 |
|
$ |
19,991 |
|
$ |
17,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
and stockholder's equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payable
to dealers and others |
|
$ |
221 |
|
$ |
177 |
|
$ |
155 |
|
Payable
to Caterpillar - other (Note 14) |
|
|
23 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
10 |
|
Accrued
expenses |
|
|
179 |
|
|
175 |
|
|
190 |
|
Income
taxes payable |
|
|
23 |
|
|
54 |
|
|
15 |
|
Payable
to Caterpillar - borrowings (Note 14) |
|
|
333 |
|
|
475 |
|
|
795 |
|
Short-term
borrowings (Note 8) |
|
|
5,464 |
|
|
4,510 |
|
|
3,936 |
|
Current
maturities of long-term debt (Note 9) |
|
|
3,519 |
|
|
2,943 |
|
|
3,654 |
|
Long-term
debt (Note 9) |
|
|
10,713 |
|
|
9,084 |
|
|
6,368 |
|
Deferred
income taxes and other liabilities (Note 12) |
|
|
377 |
|
|
259 |
|
|
167 |
|
Total
liabilities |
|
|
20,852 |
|
|
17,693 |
|
|
15,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and contingent liabilities (Note 11) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock - $1 par value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized:
2,000 shares; Issued and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
outstanding:
one share (at paid in amount) |
|
|
745 |
|
|
745 |
|
|
745 |
|
Retained
earnings |
|
|
1,690 |
|
|
1,403 |
|
|
1,147 |
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income/(loss) |
|
|
285 |
|
|
150 |
|
|
(77 |
) |
Total
stockholder's equity |
|
|
2,720 |
|
|
2,298 |
|
|
1,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities and stockholder's equity |
|
$ |
23,572 |
|
$ |
19,991 |
|
$ |
17,105 |
|
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Caterpillar
Financial Services Corporation
For
the Years Ended December 31,
(Dollars
in Millions)
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2002 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale
|
|
$ |
211 |
|
$ |
164 |
|
$ |
173 |
|
Retail
finance |
|
|
851 |
|
|
788 |
|
|
798 |
|
Operating
lease |
|
|
722 |
|
|
661 |
|
|
539 |
|
Other
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
123 |
|
|
72 |
|
Total
revenues |
|
|
1,924 |
|
|
1,736 |
|
|
1,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
532 |
|
|
483 |
|
|
544 |
|
Depreciation
on assets leased to others |
|
|
575 |
|
|
527 |
|
|
415 |
|
General,
operating, and administrative |
|
|
279 |
|
|
240 |
|
|
202 |
|
Provision
for credit losses |
|
|
105 |
|
|
101 |
|
|
109 |
|
Other |
|
|
9 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
9 |
|
Total
expenses |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
1,360 |
|
|
1,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit
before income taxes |
|
|
424 |
|
|
376 |
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
for income taxes (Note 12) |
|
|
137 |
|
|
120 |
|
|
110 |
|
Profit |
|
$ |
287 |
|
$ |
256 |
|
$ |
193 |
|
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Caterpillar
Financial Services Corporation
For
the Years Ended December 31,
(Dollars
in Millions)
|
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
Common
stock at paid-in amount: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at beginning of year |
|
$ |
745 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
745 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
745 |
|
|
|
|
Balance
at year-end |
|
|
745
|
|
|
|
|
|
745
|
|
|
|
|
|
745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained
earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at beginning of year |
|
|
1,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
954 |
|
|
|
|
Profit |
|
|
287
|
|
$ |
287 |
|
|
256 |
|
$ |
256 |
|
|
193 |
|
$ |
193 |
|
Balance
at year-end |
|
|
1,690
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income/ (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at beginning of year |
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
|
Aggregate
adjustment for year |
|
|
115 |
|
|
115 |
|
|
201 |
|
|
201 |
|
|
88 |
|
|
88 |
|
Balance
at year-end |
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
Interest
rate derivative instruments (net of tax) (Notes 1F and 10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at beginning of year [net of tax of: 2004 - $(9); 2003 - $(20); 2002 -
$(18)] |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
|
Losses
deferred during year [net of tax of: 2004 - $(17); 2003 - $(8); 2002 -
$(23)] |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
(31 |
) |
|
(15 |
) |
|
(15 |
) |
|
(45 |
) |
|
(45 |
) |
Losses
reclassed to earnings during year [net of tax of: 2004 - $27; 2003 - $19;
2002 - $21] |
|
|
49 |
|
|
49 |
|
|
37 |
|
|
37 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
41 |
|
Balance
at year-end [net of tax of: 2004 - $1; 2003 - $(9); 2002 -
$(20)] |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
Other
instruments (net of tax) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at beginning of year |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
adjustment for year |
|
|
2 |
|
|
2
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
(1 |
) |
Balance
at year-end |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
Total
accumulated other comprehensive
income/(loss) |
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
income |
|
|
|
|
$ |
422 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
483 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
stockholder's equity |
|
$ |
2,720 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,298 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,815 |
|
|
|
|
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Caterpillar
Financial Services Corporation
For
the Years Ended December 31, (Dollars
in Millions)
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
Cash
flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit |
|
$ |
287 |
|
$ |
256 |
|
$ |
193 |
|
Adjustments
for non-cash items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation of equipment on operating leases
and
non-leased equipment |
|
|
597
|
|
|
547
|
|
|
434
|
|
Amortization
of purchased discount |
|
|
(137 |
) |
|
(115 |
) |
|
(131 |
) |
Provision
for credit losses |
|
|
105 |
|
|
101 |
|
|
109 |
|
Gain
on sale of receivables |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
(28 |
) |
|
(31 |
) |
Other
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
26 |
|
Changes
in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
from customers and others |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
(105 |
) |
|
- |
|
Other
receivables/payables with Caterpillar |
|
|
15 |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
6
|
|
Payable
to dealers and others |
|
|
30 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
(6 |
) |
Accrued
expenses |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
(91 |
) |
|
1 |
|
Income
taxes payable |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
36 |
|
|
- |
|
Other
assets and liabilities, net |
|
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
(23 |
) |
Net
cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
783 |
|
|
604 |
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions,
net of cash acquired |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(245 |
) |
Expenditures
for equipment on operating leases
and
for non-leased equipment |
|
|
(1,228 |
) |
|
(1,136 |
) |
|
(1,075 |
) |
Proceeds
from disposals of equipment |
|
|
646 |
|
|
640 |
|
|
473
|
|
Additions
to finance receivables |
|
|
(20,556 |
) |
|
(12,607 |
) |
|
(11,190 |
) |
Collections
of finance receivables |
|
|
16,963 |
|
|
9,802 |
|
|
8,306 |
|
Additions
to retained interests in securitized wholesale receivables |
|
|
(6,686 |
) |
|
(7,447 |
) |
|
(6,433 |
) |
Collections
of retained interests in securitized wholesale receivables |
|
|
5,722 |
|
|
7,129 |
|
|
5,917 |
|
Proceeds
from sales of receivables |
|
|
1,363 |
|
|
1,760 |
|
|
2,310 |
|
Notes
receivable from Caterpillar |
|
|
245 |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
(82 |
) |
Proceeds
from sale of partnership investment |
|
|
290 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Investment
in partnerships |
|
|
4 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
1
|
|
Other,
net |
|
|
25 |
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
10
|
|
Net
cash used for investing activities |
|
|
(3,212 |
) |
|
(2,122 |
) |
|
(2,008 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payable
to Caterpillar - borrowings |
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
(376 |
) |
|
571 |
|
Proceeds
from long-term debt |
|
|
5,051 |
|
|
5,506 |
|
|
3,889 |
|
Payments
on long-term debt |
|
|
(2,972 |
) |
|
(3,774 |
) |
|
(3,114 |
) |
Short-term
borrowings, net |
|
|
529 |
|
|
124 |
|
|
53 |
|
Net
cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
2,449
|
|
|
1,480 |
|
|
1,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
9 |
|
|
7
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
29 |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
69 |
|
|
100 |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
$ |
98 |
|
$ |
69 |
|
$ |
100 |
|
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
All
short-term investments, which consist primarily of highly liquid investments
with original maturities of less than three months, are considered to be cash
equivalents.
(DOLLARS
IN MILLIONS)
A.
Basis of consolidation
Caterpillar
Financial Services Corporation, a Delaware corporation organized in 1981
(together with its subsidiaries, "Cat Financial"), is a wholly owned finance
subsidiary of Caterpillar Inc. (together with its other subsidiaries,
"Caterpillar" or "Cat"). Our primary business is to provide retail-financing
alternatives for Caterpillar products to customers and dealers around the world.
Such retail financing is primarily comprised of financing of Caterpillar
equipment, machinery, or engines. In addition, we also provide financing for
vehicles, power generation facilities, and marine vessels that, in most cases,
incorporate Caterpillar products. We also provide wholesale financing to
Caterpillar dealers and purchase short-term dealer receivables from
Caterpillar.
The
financial statements include the accounts of Caterpillar Financial Services
Corporation and its subsidiaries. Investments in companies that are owned 20% to
50% or are less than 20% owned and for which we have significant influence are
accounted for by the equity method. Investments in companies that are less than
20% owned and for which we do not have significant influence are accounted for
by the cost method. We consolidate all variable interest entities where we are
the primary beneficiary. All material intercompany balances have been
eliminated.
Certain
amounts for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current
period presentation.
B.
Recognition of earned income
· |
Retail
finance revenue on
finance leases, installment sale contracts, and governmental (non-federal)
tax leases is recognized over the term of the contract at a constant rate
of return on the scheduled outstanding principal
balance. |
· |
Operating
lease revenue is
recorded on a straight-line basis in the period earned over the life of
the contract. |
· |
Wholesale
revenue on
dealer inventory, rental fleets, rental stores, short-term dealer
receivables, and on retained interests in securitized wholesale
receivables is recognized based on the daily balance of wholesale
receivables outstanding and the applicable effective interest rate.
|
· |
Loan
origination and commitment fees
over five hundred dollars are deferred and then amortized to finance
revenue using the interest method over the life of the finance
receivables. |
Recognition
of income is suspended when management determines that collection of future
income on loans or finance leases is not probable (generally after 120 days past
due). Accrual is resumed, and previously suspended income is recognized, when
the receivable becomes contractually current and/or collection doubts are
removed. Cash receipts on impaired loans or finance leases are recorded against
the receivable and then to any unrecognized income. A loan or finance lease is
considered impaired when the investment in the contract or equipment exceeds the
expected proceeds, including disposition of underlying collateral if
applicable.
C.
Depreciation
Depreciation
for equipment on operating leases is recognized using the straight-line method
over the lease term, typically one to seven years. The depreciable basis is the
original cost of the equipment less the estimated residual value of the
equipment at the end of the lease term.
D.
Residual values
The
residuals for leases classified as operating leases, in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 13 (SFAS 13) “Accounting for
Leases”, are included in Equipment on operating leases. The residuals for leases
classified as capital leases, in accordance with SFAS 13, are included in
Finance leases and installment sale contracts.
During
the term of the leases, residual amounts are monitored. If estimated market
values significantly decline due to economic factors, obsolescence, or other
adverse circumstances, the residuals are adjusted to the lower estimated values
by a charge to earnings. For equipment on operating leases, the charge is
recognized through depreciation expense. For finance leases, it is recognized
through a reduction of finance revenue.
E.
Amortization
Debt
issuance costs are capitalized and amortized to interest expense over the term
of the debt issue.
F.
Derivative financial instruments
Our
earnings and cash flow are subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign
currency exchange rates and interest rates. Our "Risk Management Policy"
(Policy) allows for the use of derivative financial instruments to prudently
manage foreign currency exchange rate and interest rate exposure. Our Policy
specifies that derivatives are not to be used for speculative purposes.
Derivatives that we use are primarily foreign currency forward and option
contracts and interest rate swaps. Our derivative activities are subject to the
management, direction, and control of our financial officers. Risk management
practices, including the use of financial derivative instruments, are presented
to the Audit Committee of the Caterpillar Board of Directors at least
annually.
All
derivatives are recognized on the balance sheet at their fair value. All
derivatives in a net receivable position are included in Other assets, and those
in a net liability position are included in Accrued expenses. Cash flows related
to these instruments are reflected in the operating activities section of the
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. On the date the derivative contract is
entered into, we designate the derivative as (1) a hedge of the fair value of a
recognized liability ("fair value" hedge), (2) a hedge of a forecasted
transaction or the variability of cash flow to be paid ("cash flow" hedge), or
(3) an "undesignated" instrument. Changes in the fair value of a derivative that
is qualified, designated, and highly effective as a fair value hedge, along with
the gain or loss on the hedged liability that is attributable to the hedged
risk, are recorded in current earnings. Changes in the fair value of a
derivative that is qualified, designated, and highly effective as a cash flow
hedge are recorded in other comprehensive income until earnings are affected by
the forecasted transaction or the variability of cash flow, and are then
reported in current earnings. Changes in the fair value of undesignated
derivative instruments and the ineffective portion of designated derivative
instruments are reported in current earnings.
We
formally document all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged
items, as well as the risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking
various hedge transactions. This process includes linking all derivatives that
are designated as fair value hedges to specific liabilities on the balance sheet
and linking cash flow hedges to specific forecasted transactions or variability
of cash flow.
We also
formally assess, both at the hedge's inception and on an ongoing basis, whether
the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in
offsetting changes in fair values or cash flow of hedged items. When it is
determined that a derivative is not highly effective as a hedge or that it has
ceased to be a highly effective hedge, we discontinue hedge accounting
prospectively, in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 133 “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (SFAS
133). Please refer to Note 10 for more information on derivatives, including the
methods used to account for them.
G.
Allowance for credit losses
The
allowance for credit losses is evaluated on a regular basis and adjusted based
upon management's best estimate of probable losses inherent in our finance
receivables. Uncollectible receivable balances, including accrued interest, are
written off against the allowance for credit losses when the underlying
collateral is repossessed or when we determine that it is probable the
receivable balance is uncollectible. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited
to the allowance when received.
H.
Income taxes
We have a
tax sharing agreement with Caterpillar under which we combine our tax position
with Caterpillar's when appropriate. When we combine our tax positions under
this agreement, we pay to or receive from Caterpillar our allocated share of
income taxes or credits.
Differences
between accounting rules and tax laws cause differences between the bases of
certain assets and liabilities for financial reporting and tax purposes. The tax
effects of these differences, to the extent they are temporary, are recorded as
deferred tax assets and liabilities netted by tax jurisdiction and
taxpayer.
I.
Foreign currency translation
Assets
and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries (the majority of which use the local
currency as their functional currency) are translated at current exchange rates.
The effects of translation adjustments are reported as a separate component of
accumulated other comprehensive loss entitled "Foreign currency translation
adjustment." Gains and losses resulting from the translation of foreign currency
amounts to functional currency are included in Other revenue on the Consolidated
Statement of Profit.
J.
Securitized receivables
We sell
retail installment sale contracts and finance leases into trusts that issue
asset-backed securities to the public. Gains and losses on the securitization of
finance receivables represent the difference between the carrying value and the
fair value of the receivables. Differences in carrying value and fair value
arise because of changes in interest rates. For example, in periods of
decreasing interest rates, the fair value of fixed rate receivables increases
resulting in a gain when the assets are securitized.
When
retail finance receivables are securitized, we retain interest in the
receivables in the form of interest-only strips, servicing rights, cash reserve
accounts, and subordinated certificates. Gains or losses on the sale are
dependent upon the purchase price being allocated between the carrying value of
the receivables sold and the retained interests based upon their relative fair
value. We estimate fair value based upon the present value of future expected
cash flows using key assumptions for credit losses, prepayment speeds, forward
yield curves, and discount rates. The retained interests in the retail finance
receivables are included in Other assets on the Consolidated Statement of
Financial Position.
When
wholesale finance receivables are securitized, we retain interests in the
receivables in the form of certificates. The fair value of these certificated
retained interests approximates carrying value due to their short-term nature.
The gain on sale of these receivables, which is included in Other revenue, is
principally the difference between the unearned discount on the sold portion
less the related costs over their remaining term.
Please
refer to Note 4 for more information on securitized receivables.
K.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial
statements
We
believe the financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal
recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the consolidated
statements of financial position, profit, changes in equity, and cash flows for
the periods presented. The preparation of financial statements, in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America,
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts. The most significant estimates are the allowance for credit losses and
residual values for leased assets. Other significant estimates are the
assumptions used to determine the fair value of derivatives and retained
interests in securitizations. Actual results may differ from these
estimates.
L.
New accounting standards
In
December 2003, the Accounting Standards Executive Committee (AcSEC) of the AICPA
issued Statement of Position 03-3 (SOP 03-3), “Accounting for Certain Loans or
Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer.” This SOP addresses accounting for
differences between contractual cash flows and cash flows expected to be
collected from an investor’s initial investment in loans or debt securities
acquired in a transfer if those differences are attributable, at least in part,
to credit quality. It includes loans acquired in business combinations; it does
not apply to loans originated by the entity. This SOP is effective for loans or
debt securities acquired effective January 1, 2005. The adoption of SOP 03-3 is
not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.
In
November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 151 (SFAS 151), "Inventory Costs an
amendment of APB No. 43, Chapter 4." SFAS 151 discusses the general principles
applicable to the pricing of inventory. Paragraph 5 of ARB 43, Chapter 4
provides guidance on allocating certain costs to inventory. This Statement
amends ARB 43, Chapter 4, to clarify that abnormal amounts of idle facility
expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted materials (spoilage) should be
recognized as current-period charges. In addition, this Statement requires that
allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on
the normal capacity of production facilities. This new accounting standard is
effective January 1, 2006. The adoption of SFAS 151 is not expected to have any
impact on our financial statements.
In
December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
153 (SFAS 153), "Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets an amendment of APB Opinion No.
29." SFAS 153 addresses the measurement of exchanges of nonmonetary assets. It
eliminates the exception from fair value measurement for nonmonetary exchanges
of similar productive assets in paragraph 21(b) of APB Opinion No. 29
“Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions” and replaces it with an exception for
exchanges that do not have commercial substance. A nonmonetary exchange has
commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to
change significantly as a result of the exchange. As required by SFAS 153, we
will adopt this new accounting standard effective July 1, 2005. The adoption of
SFAS 153 is not expected to have any impact on our financial
statements.
The
contractual maturities and future minimum lease payments of outstanding
receivables, at December 31, 2004
were:
Amounts
due in |
|
|
Retail
Installment Sale Contracts |
|
|
Wholesale
Installment Sale Contracts |
|
|
Retail
Finance Leases |
|
|
Wholesale
Finance Leases |
|
|
Retail
Notes |
|
|
Wholesale
Notes
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
$ |
2,361 |
|
$ |
40 |
|
$ |
1,804 |
|
$ |
23 |
|
$ |
1,741 |
|
$ |
4,335 |
|
$ |
10,304 |
|
2006 |
|
|
1,712 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
1,355 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
767 |
|
|
189 |
|
|
4,052 |
|
2007 |
|
|
1,089 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
820 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
536 |
|
|
133 |
|
|
2,601 |
|
2008 |
|
|
576 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
445 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
395 |
|
|
116 |
|
|
1,544 |
|
2009 |
|
|
189 |
|
|
-
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
366 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
781 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
47 |
|
|
-
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
-
|
|
|
775 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
1,069 |
|
|
|
|
5,974 |
|
|
60 |
|
|
4,876 |
|
|
72 |
|
|
4,580 |
|
|
4,789 |
|
|
20,351 |
|
Residual
value |
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
919 |
|
|
53 |
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
972 |
|
Less:
Unearned income |
|
|
534 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
550 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
56 |
|
|
106 |
|
|
1,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,440 |
|
$ |
59 |
|
$ |
5,245 |
|
$ |
111 |
|
$ |
4,524 |
|
$ |
4,683 |
|
$ |
20,062 |
|
Add:
Caterpillar notes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
Less:
Allowance for credit losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
278 |
|
Total
net finance receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19,904 |
|
Receivables
generally may be repaid or refinanced without penalty prior to contractual
maturity, and we also sell receivables. Accordingly, this presentation should
not be regarded as a forecast of future cash collections.
Impaired
loans or finance leases
A loan or
finance lease is considered impaired when the investment in the contract or
equipment exceeds the expected proceeds, including disposition of underlying
collateral if applicable.
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
Total
investment in impaired loans/finance leases at December
31, |
|
$ |
181 |
|
$ |
275 |
|
$ |
366 |
|
Less:
Impaired loans/finance leases for which there is no related allowance for
credit losses (due to the fair value of underlying
collateral) |
|
|
130 |
|
|
177 |
|
|
233 |
|
Impaired
loans/finance leases for which there is a related allowance for credit
losses |
|
$ |
51 |
|
$ |
98 |
|
$ |
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
investment in impaired loans/finance leases |
|
$ |
265 |
|
$ |
321 |
|
$ |
292 |
|
Non-accrual
and past due loans or finance leases
We
consider an account past due if any portion of an installment is due and unpaid
for more than 30 days. Recognition of income is suspended when management
determines that collection of future income is not probable (generally after 120
days past due). Accrual is resumed, and previously suspended income is
recognized, when the receivable becomes contractually current and/or collection
doubts are removed.
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
Investment
in loans/finance leases on non-accrual status at December
31, |
|
$ |
176 |
|
$ |
233 |
|
$ |
370 |
|
Investment
in loans/finance leases past due over 90 days and still
accruing |
|
$ |
11 |
|
$ |
25 |
|
$ |
72 |
|
In
estimating the allowance for credit losses, we review accounts that are past
due, non-performing, or in bankruptcy.
Allowance
for credit losses activity for the year ended December
31,
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
Balance
at beginning of year |
|
$ |
241 |
|
$ |
207 |
|
$ |
177 |
|
Provision
for credit losses |
|
|
105 |
|
|
101 |
|
|
109 |
|
Receivables
written off |
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
(104 |
) |
|
(103 |
) |
Recoveries
on receivables previously written off |
|
|
16 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
18 |
|
Adjustment
related to sale of finance receivables |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
(4 |
) |
|
(4 |
) |
Foreign
currency translation adjustment |
|
|
10 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at end of year |
|
$ |
278 |
|
$ |
241 |
|
$ |
207 |
|
The
increase in the allowance for credit losses is directly related to the
continuing growth of our finance receivables.
The
components of finance leases at December 31, were as follows:
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
Total
minimum lease payments receivable |
|
$ |
4,948 |
|
$ |
4,161 |
|
$ |
3,794 |
|
Estimated
residual value of leased assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guaranteed |
|
|
431 |
|
|
369 |
|
|
306 |
|
Unguaranteed |
|
|
541 |
|
|
563 |
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
|
5,920 |
|
|
5,093 |
|
|
4,704 |
|
Less:
Unearned income |
|
|
564 |
|
|
512 |
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
finance leases |
|
$ |
5,356 |
|
$ |
4,581 |
|
$ |
4,179 |
|
The
securitization facilities involved in our retail
securitizations are qualifying special-purpose entities (QSPEs) and thus, in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard 140 (SFAS 140)
“Accounting
for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of
Liabilities”, are not
consolidated. We also utilize a revolving securitization structure in our
wholesale securitizations whereby eligible dealer receivables purchased from
Caterpillar are initially securitized into a trust. The trust subsequently
issues a collateralized trust obligation certificate (CTO) to third party
purchasers for their portion of these receivables. The trust also issues a
transferor certificate (certificated retained interests) to us for the portion
not represented by the CTO. For 2002 and 2003 and through August of 2004, the
trust was a QSPE and thus in accordance with SFAS 140 was not consolidated. The
outstanding principal balance of the CTO was not included in our Consolidated
Statement of Financial Position during these periods. The certificated retained
interests are included in Retained interests in securitized wholesale
receivables in our Consolidated Statement of Financial Position. Due to a high
volume of dealer receivable financing activity from September through December
2004, our certificated retained interests in the trust exceeded 90% of the fair
value of trust assets. Thus, during this period, the trust did not qualify as a
QSPE as defined by SFAS 140. We therefore consolidated the trust in accordance
with FIN 46R, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (revised) as it
represents a variable interest entity for which we are the primary beneficiary.
Legally, the receivables have been sold to the trust and are not assets of Cat
Financial and are not available to our creditors.
As of
December 31, 2004, the assets of the trust of $2,587 are included in Wholesale
notes receivable in our Consolidated Statement of Financial Position and the CTO
of $240 is included in Short-term borrowings (see Note 8 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements).
Other
than the certificated retained interests, the investors and the securitization
facilities have no recourse to our assets for failure of debtors to pay when
due.
Off-balance-sheet
securitized receivables at December 31, were as follows:
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
Wholesale
receivables securitized |
$
- |
|
$1,790 |
|
$1,385 |
Less:
Retained interests in securitized wholesale receivables |
- |
|
1,550 |
|
1,145 |
Off-balance-sheet
securitized wholesale receivables |
$
- |
|
$
240 |
|
$
240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installment
sale contracts securitized |
$767 |
|
$746 |
|
$655 |
Finance
leases securitized |
48 |
|
67 |
|
71 |
Less:
retained interests (included in Other assets) |
73 |
|
73 |
|
47 |
Off-balance-sheet
securitized retail receivables |
$742 |
|
$740 |
|
$679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
These
receivables are not available to pay our creditors.
Wholesale
Receivables
We
purchase Caterpillar North American dealer trade receivables at a discount. The
discount is an estimate of the amount of revenue that would be earned at a
market rate on the receivables over their expected life. We receive an annual
service fee of approximately 1.0% of the average outstanding principal balance
of the CTO. Discount on the portion of the receivables that are not sold is
amortized on an effective yield basis over the life of the receivables and
recognized as Wholesale finance revenue. Because the receivables are short-term
in nature, the carrying amount approximates the fair value, and the gain,
included in Other revenue, is principally the difference between the unearned
discount on the sold portion less the related costs over their remaining term.
Expected credit losses are assumed to be 0% because dealer receivables have
historically had no losses and none are expected in the future. During 2004,
2003, and 2002, we recognized a pre-tax gain on the sale of dealer receivables
of $5, $6, and $12, respectively.
The
certificated retained interests in sold dealer receivables were $0, $1,550, and
$1,145 as of December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively, and are separately
identified in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.
Retail
Installment Sale Contracts and Finance Leases
During
2004, 2003, and 2002, we securitized retail installment sale contracts and
finance leases into public asset-backed securitization facilities. These finance
receivables, which are being held in securitization trusts, are secured by new
and used equipment. We retained servicing responsibilities and subordinated
interests related to these securitizations. Subordinated interests include
subordinated certificates with an initial fair value of $8 ($9 in 2003 and $8 in
2002), an interest in future cash flows (excess) with an initial fair value of
$2 ($14 in 2003 and $11 in 2002), and reserve accounts each with an initial fair
value of $10 in 2004, 2003, and 2002. Our retained interests are generally
subordinate to the investors' interests. A net gain of $13 was recognized on the
2004 transaction ($22 in 2003 and $18 in 2002). Significant assumptions used to
estimate the fair value of the retained interests (excess and the reserve
account) and subordinated certificates at the time of the transaction
were:
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
Discount
rate |
10.7% |
|
11.0% |
|
10.9% |
Weighted-average
prepayment rate |
14.0% |
|
14.0% |
|
14.0% |
Expected
credit losses |
1.0% |
|
1.0% |
|
1.0% |
During
2004, 2003, and 2002, we also serviced finance receivables in the form of
installment sale contracts and finance lease contracts that we securitized, for
which we receive an annual servicing fee of approximately 1.0% of the unpaid
note value.
As of
December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, the subordinated retained interests in the
public securitizations totaled $73, $73, and $47, respectively. Key assumptions
used to determine the fair value of the retained interests were:
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
Cash
flow discount rates on retained interests and subordinated
tranches |
10.7% |
|
9.1-10.8% |
|
9.0-10.7% |
Weighted-average
maturity in months |
28 |
|
27 |
|
29 |
Average
prepayment rate |
14.0% |
|
14.0% |
|
14.0% |
Expected
credit losses |
1.0% |
|
1.0% |
|
1.0% |
Cash
flows from securitizations
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
Dealer
Receivables |
|
|
Finance
Receivables |
|
|
Dealer
Receivables |
|
|
Finance
Receivables |
|
|
Dealer
Receivables |
|
|
Finance
Receivables |
|
Cash
proceeds from initial sales of receivables |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
639 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
661 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
614 |
|
Proceeds
from collections
reinvested in revolving securitization* |
|
$ |
663 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
1,099 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
1,696 |
|
$ |
- |
|
Proceeds
from collections of retained interests in securitized wholesale
receivables* |
|
$ |
5,722 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
9,802 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
8,306 |
|
$ |
- |
|
Servicing
fees received |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
9 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
8 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
$ |
7 |
|
Other
cash flows received on retained interests |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
34 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
15 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
33 |
|
* For
2004, proceeds include only the periods the trust was a QSPE.
Characteristics
of securitized retail receivables
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2002 |
|
Total
securitized principal balance |
|
$ |
815 |
|
$ |
813 |
|
$ |
726 |
|
Average
securitized principal balance for the year ended December
31 |
|
$ |
873 |
|
$ |
884 |
|
$ |
619 |
|
Loans
> 30 days past due at year end |
|
$ |
26 |
|
$ |
34 |
|
$ |
32 |
|
Net
credit losses during the year |
|
$ |
4 |
|
$ |
6 |
|
$ |
5 |
|
Characteristics
of securitized wholesale receivables
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2002 |
|
Collateralized
trust obligation balance |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
240 |
|
$ |
240 |
|
Average
collateralized trust obligation for the year ended December
31* |
|
$ |
240 |
|
$ |
240 |
|
$ |
324 |
|
Average
certificated retained interests in securitized wholesale
receivables* |
|
$ |
1,936 |
|
$ |
1,350 |
|
$ |
1,012 |
|
* For
2004, average balances include only the periods the trust was a
QSPE.
To
estimate the impact on our income of changes to the key economic assumptions
used to estimate the fair value of residual cash flows in retained interests
from retail finance receivable securitizations, we compute a "shocked" fair
value of retained interests. The difference between the current fair value and
the "shocked" fair value is an estimate of our sensitivity to a change in the
assumptions. We determine the "shocked" fair value by applying 10% and 20%
adverse changes to individual assumptions used to calculate the fair value at
December 31, 2004. This estimate does not adjust for other variations that may
occur should one of the assumptions actually change. Accordingly, no assurance
can be given that actual results would be consistent with the results of our
estimate. Our
sensitivity
analysis indicated that the impact of a 20% adverse change in individual
assumptions used to calculate the fair value of all our retained interests at
December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002 would be less than $2.
For our
retained interests in securitized wholesale receivables, carrying amount
approximated fair value due to the short-term nature of these
receivables.
Components
of equipment on operating leases, less accumulated depreciation at December 31,
were as follows:
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
Equipment
on operating leases, at cost |
$3,720 |
|
$3,357 |
|
$2,735 |
Less:
Accumulated depreciation |
1,151 |
|
1,038 |
|
774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment
on operating leases, net |
$2,569 |
|
$2,319 |
|
$1,961 |
At
December 31, 2004, scheduled minimum rental payments for operating leases were
as follows:
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
Thereafter |
Total |
$600 |
$438 |
$278 |
$150 |
$70 |
$31 |
$1,567 |
Our
portfolio is primarily comprised of receivables under installment sale
contracts, receivables arising from leasing transactions, notes receivable, and
retained interests in securitized wholesale receivables. Percentages of the
total value of our portfolio (total net finance receivables plus retained
interests in securitized wholesale receivables plus equipment on operating
leases, less accumulated depreciation) represented by each financing plan at
December 31, were as follows:
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
Retail
Financing: |
|
|
|
Installment
sale contracts |
24% |
22% |
20% |
Tax
leases |
19% |
20% |
20% |
Customer
loans |
16% |
19% |
18% |
Finance
(non-tax) leases |
14% |
14% |
16% |
Dealer
loans |
4% |
6% |
8% |
Government
lease-purchase contracts |
1% |
1% |
1% |
Wholesale
financing, including retained interests in securitized wholesale
receivables |
22% |
18% |
17% |
Receivables
from customers in construction-related industries made up approximately
one-third of total finance receivables plus retained interests in securitized
wholesale receivables at December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002. No single customer
or dealer represented a greater than 10% concentration of credit risk.
We
typically maintain a security interest in retail financed equipment and require
physical damage insurance coverage on all financed equipment. For
information concerning business segments see Note 16.
Regarding
our derivative instruments, collateral is not required of the counterparties or
of our company. We do not anticipate non-performance by any of the
counterparties. Our exposure to credit loss in the event of non-performance by
the counterparties is limited to only those gains that we have recorded, but
have not yet received cash payment. At December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, the
exposure to credit loss was $78, $88, and $86, respectively. For information
concerning derivatives see Note 10.
At
December 31, 2004, we had the following credit lines available:
Revolving
credit lines. We
participate in two global credit facilities with a syndicate of banks totaling
$5,000 available in the aggregate to both Caterpillar and Cat Financial to
support commercial paper programs. Based on management's allocation decision,
which can be revised at any time, the portion of the facility available to Cat
Financial at December 31, 2004 was $4,400. The five-year facility of $2,500
expires in September 2009. The 364-day facility of $2,500 expires in September
2005 and contains a provision that allows Caterpillar or Cat Financial to obtain
a one-year loan for up to the full amount of the facility in September 2005 that
would mature in September 2006.
In
addition to the syndicated global credit facilities, we also have an A$50 (USD
equivalent = $39) credit facility with one bank to support our Australian
subsidiary's commercial paper program.
The
revolving credit facilities require us to maintain a consolidated ratio of
profit before taxes plus fixed charges to fixed charges at no less than 1.15 to
1 for each quarter; total debt to total stockholder's equity, as defined by
agreement, may not exceed 8.0 to 1 at year-end (8.5 to 1 on a moving six-month
average at other than year-end); and net worth must be at least $20.
At
December 31, 2004, there were no borrowings under these lines, and we were in
compliance with all debt covenants, except our debt-to-equity ratio, as defined
under the revolving credit facilities, which was 8.23 to 1 at December 31, 2004.
By covenant, this is not to exceed 8.00 to 1 at year-end. The higher year-end
ratio was primarily the result of unexpected record levels of financing activity
in the 4th quarter,
particularly in December. We have received a year-end leverage covenant waiver
from our banks.
Short-term
credit lines from banks. These
credit lines total $1,052 and will be eligible for renewal at various future
dates or have no specified expiration date. They are used for local bank
borrowings of subsidiaries. At December 31, 2004, we had $370 outstanding
against these credit lines compared to $183 at December 31, 2003.
Variable
amount lending agreements with Caterpillar. Under
these agreements, we may borrow up to $1,650 from Caterpillar, and Caterpillar
may borrow up to $1,239 from us. The agreements are in effect for indefinite
periods of time and may be changed or terminated by either party with 30 days
notice. We had notes payable of $333 and notes receivable of $120 outstanding
under these agreements at December 31, 2004, compared to notes payable of $475
and notes receivable of $378 at December 31, 2003. Please refer to Note 14 for
more information concerning activity under these lines.
Short-term
borrowings outstanding at December 31 were comprised of the
following:
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
Avg.
Rate |
|
Balance |
|
Avg.
Rate |
|
Balance |
|
Avg.
Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
paper, net |
|
$ |
4,372 |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
$ |
3,912 |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
$ |
3,507 |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
Payable
to banks |
|
|
370 |
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
183 |
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
174 |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
Variable
denomination floating rate demand notes |
|
|
482 |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
415 |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
255 |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
Collateralized
trust obligation* |
|
|
240 |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,464 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,510 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,936 |
|
|
|
|
*This
relates to consolidating the dealer securitization trust described in Note 4 of
the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The
decrease from 2003 to 2004 of 1.3% in the average rate for Payable to banks is
primarily due to the increase in debt in foreign countries with lower interest
rates. The increase from 2002 to 2003 of 1.5% was primarily due to the increase
in debt in foreign countries with higher interest rates.
Additional
information about our short-term debt is as follows for the years ended December
31:
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
Average
short-term borrowings |
|
$ |
4,654 |
|
$ |
3,784 |
|
$ |
3,642 |
|
Weighted
average annual interest rate |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
2.7 |
% |
|
2.9 |
% |
During
2004, we issued $5,166 of medium-term notes, of which $3,089 were at fixed
interest rates and $2,077 were at floating interest rates, primarily indexed to
LIBOR. At December 31, 2004, the outstanding medium-term notes had remaining
maturities ranging up to 20 years. Cash paid
for interest on both short-term and long-term borrowings in 2004, 2003, and 2002
was $507, $488, and $546, respectively.
Long-term
borrowings outstanding at December 31 were comprised of the
following:
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
Avg.
Rate |
|
Balance |
|
Avg.
Rate |
|
Balance |
|
Avg.
Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medium-term
notes |
|
$ |
13,992 |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
$ |
11,720 |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
$ |
9,954 |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
Payable
to banks |
|
|
5 |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
70 |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
32 |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
Loans
from a company-owned partnership |
|
|
8 |
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
7 |
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
38 |
|
|
7.0 |
% |
Unamortized
discount |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
Deposit
obligation * |
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
14,232 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,027 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*The
deposit obligation has a corresponding security deposit, which is included in
Other assets in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position. This deposit
obligation and corresponding security deposit relate to a finance arrangement
which provides us a return. This arrangement requires that we commit to a
certain long-term obligation and provide a security deposit which will fulfill
this obligation when it becomes due.
Long-term
debt outstanding at December 31, 2004 matures as follows:
2005 |
|
$ |
3,519 |
|
2006 |
|
|
4,130 |
|
2007 |
|
|
2,560 |
|
2008 |
|
|
1,127 |
|
2009 |
|
|
1,695 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
1,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
14,232 |
|
Our
earnings and cash flows are subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign
currency exchange rates and interest rates. Our Policy allows for the use of
derivative financial instruments to prudently manage foreign currency exchange
rate and interest rate exposure. Our Policy specifies that derivatives are not
to be used for speculative purposes. Derivatives that we use are primarily
foreign currency forward and option contracts and interest rate swaps.
Our
derivative activities are subject to the management, direction, and control of
our financial officers. Risk
management practices, including the use of financial derivative instruments, are
presented to the Audit Committee of the Caterpillar Board of Directors at least
annually.
Foreign
Currency Exchange Rate Risk
In
managing foreign currency risk, our objective is to minimize earnings volatility
resulting from conversion and the remeasurement of net foreign currency balance
sheet positions. Our Policy allows the use of foreign currency forward contracts
to offset the risk of currency mismatch between our receivables and debt. None
of these foreign currency forward contracts are designated as a hedge. Other
revenue included losses of $45, $128, and $100 on the undesignated contracts for
2004, 2003, and 2002 respectively, substantially offset by balance sheet
remeasurement and conversion gains.
Due to
the long-term nature of our net investments in foreign subsidiaries, we
generally do not hedge the related currency exposure.
Interest
Rate Risk
Interest
rate movements create a degree of risk to our operations by affecting the amount
of our interest payments and the value of our fixed rate debt. Our policy is to
use interest rate swap agreements to manage our exposure to interest rate
changes and lower the cost of borrowed funds.
We have a
match funding policy whereby the interest rate profile (fixed rate or floating
rate) of our debt portfolio largely matches the interest rate profile of our
receivables plus retained interests in securitized wholesale receivables within
established guidelines. In connection with that policy, we use interest rate
derivative instruments to modify the debt structure to match these assets. This
match funding reduces the volatility of margins between interest-bearing assets
and interest-bearing liabilities, regardless of which direction interest rates
move. We also use these instruments to gain an economic and/or competitive
advantage through a lower cost of borrowed funds. This is accomplished by
changing the characteristics of existing debt instruments or entering into new
agreements in combination with the issuance of new debt.
We use
floating-to-fixed, fixed-to-floating, and floating-to-floating interest rate
swaps to meet our match funding policy. To support hedge accounting, we
designate fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps as fair value hedges of the fair
value of our fixed rate debt at the inception of the swap contract. Our hedge
accounting is further supported by designating virtually all floating-to-fixed
interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges of the variability of future cash
flows.
Our
fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps are 100% effective as indicated
below:
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
Gain/(loss)
on designated interest rate derivatives |
|
$ |
(28 |
) |
$ |
(20 |
) |
$ |
17 |
|
Gain/(loss)
on hedged debt |
|
|
28 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
effect to Other revenue |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
During
2004, we liquidated three fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps, and during
2002, we liquidated four such swaps. As a result, the fair value adjustment of
the original debt is amortized to earnings ratably over the remaining life of
the hedged debt. Gains of $2, $2, and $1 were amortized to Interest expense for
the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively. There were no
circumstances where hedge treatment was discontinued during 2004 or
2003.
For 2004,
2003, and 2002, a gain or loss of less than $1 was included in Other revenue for
both the ineffectiveness of our floating-to-fixed interest rate swaps designated
as cash flow hedges and our mark-to-market of floating-to-fixed interest rate
swaps that were not designated as a hedge.
Based on
current market conditions, $3 of deferred net losses included in Accumulated
other comprehensive income at December 31, 2004 was expected to be reclassified
to Interest expense over the next twelve months as interest expense is accrued
on our floating-to-fixed interest rate swaps. No floating-to-fixed interest rate
swaps were liquidated during 2004, 2003, and 2002.
We are
contingently liable under loan guarantees in which we have agreed to repurchase
loans of certain Caterpillar dealers in the event of default. These guarantees
have terms generally ranging from one to four years and are secured primarily by
dealer assets, including Caterpillar equipment. Most of our guarantees arose due
to our relationship with Caterpillar dealers. We have
also provided a limited indemnity of $45 to a third party bank as part of an
assignment of certain leases to that bank. The leases are supported by, among
other things, political risk insurance. The indemnity is triggered only if a
valid claim under the political risk insurance is filed by the insured with an
insurer rated "A" or higher by A.M. Best and Company; the claim is accepted by
such insurer when filed; and, such insurer subsequently fails to pay such claim
because the insurer then becomes insolvent. The indemnity is for eight years and
is unsecured. No loss has been experienced nor is any anticipated under these
guarantees. The related book value was $10 at December 31, 2004 compared to $5
at December 31, 2003 and $0 at December 31, 2002 (the recognition/measurement
provisions, of FASB Interpretation No. 45 related to guarantees, are effective
for guarantees issued or modified subsequent to December 31, 2002). The maximum
potential amount of future payments (undiscounted and without reduction for any
amounts that may possibly be recovered under recourse or collateralized
provisions) we could be required to make under the guarantees at December 31 are
as follows:
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
Guarantees
with Caterpillar dealers |
|
$ |
364 |
|
$ |
380 |
|
$ |
290 |
|
Guarantees
- other |
|
|
62 |
|
|
37 |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
guarantees |
|
$ |
426 |
|
$ |
417 |
|
$ |
324 |
|
We are
party to agreements in the normal course of business with selected customers and
Caterpillar dealers in which we commit to provide a set dollar amount of
financing on a pre-approved basis. We also provide lines of credit to selected
customers and Caterpillar dealers, of which a portion remains unused as of the
end of the period. Commitments and lines of credit generally have fixed
expiration dates or other termination clauses. It has been our experience that
not all commitments and lines of credit will be used. Management applies the
same credit policies when making commitments and granting lines of credit as it
does for any other financing. We do not require collateral for these
commitments/lines, but if credit is extended, collateral may be required upon
funding. The amount of the unused commitments and lines of credit for dealers as
of December 31, 2004 was $5,015 compared to $4,784 at December 31, 2003 and
$5,851 at December 31, 2002. The amount of the unused commitments and lines of
credit for customers as of December 31, 2004 was $1,501 compared to $1,336 at
December 31, 2003 and $885 at December 31, 2002.
We are
party to various litigation matters and claims, and while the results cannot be
predicted with certainty, management believes the final outcome of such matters
and claims will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial
position, profit, or liquidity.
The
components of the provision for income taxes were as follows for the years ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
tax provision: |
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
U.S.
federal |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
12 |
|
$ |
22 |
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
50 |
|
|
53
|
|
|
29 |
|
State
(U.S.) |
|
|
- |
|
|
4 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
69 |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
tax provision: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
federal |
|
|
89 |
|
|
74 |
|
|
49 |
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
(28 |
) |
|
3 |
|
State
(U.S.) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
5 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
51 |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
137 |
|
$ |
120 |
|
$ |
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
paid for taxes |
|
$ |
83 |
|
$ |
36 |
|
$ |
49 |
|
Current
tax provision is the amount of income taxes reported or expected to be reported
on our tax returns. Under our tax sharing agreement with Caterpillar, we have
paid to or received from Caterpillar, our allocated share of income taxes or
credits each quarter.
Differences
between accounting rules and tax laws cause differences between the bases of
certain assets and liabilities for financial reporting and tax purposes. The tax
effects of these differences, to the extent they are temporary, are recorded as
deferred tax assets and liabilities netted by tax jurisdiction and taxpayer. Our
consolidated deferred taxes consisted of the following components at December
31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
tax assets: |
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
Allowance
for credit losses |
|
$ |
67 |
|
$ |
63 |
|
$ |
53 |
|
Expected
foreign tax credit |
|
|
4 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
6 |
|
Foreign
tax credit carryforwards |
|
|
35 |
|
|
34 |
|
|
30 |
|
Net
operating loss carryforwards |
|
|
22 |
|
|
31 |
|
|
24 |
|
Deferred
losses on derivative instruments |
|
|
- |
|
|
9 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
140 |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
tax liabilities - primarily depreciation |
|
|
(441 |
) |
|
(355 |
) |
|
(280 |
) |
Valuation
allowance for deferred tax assets |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
(8 |
) |
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
(445 |
) |
|
(363 |
) |
|
(288 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
taxes - net |
|
$ |
(317 |
) |
$ |
(223 |
) |
$ |
(155 |
) |
Of our
foreign subsidiaries that are in net operating loss carryforward positions,
there is not sufficient evidence to substantiate recognition of deferred tax
assets. Accordingly, a valuation allowance has been recorded for this amount. It
is possible that circumstances could change in the near term at one or more of
these foreign subsidiaries which would allow us to reduce the valuation
allowance and to record additional net deferred tax assets.
As of
December 31, 2004, amounts and expiration dates of net operating loss
carryforwards in various non-U.S. taxing jurisdictions were:
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009
- 2015 |
Unlimited |
Total |
$
- |
$2 |
$1 |
$1 |
$54 |
$17 |
$75 |
As of
December 31, 2004, the amounts and expiration dates of U.S. foreign tax credit
carryforwards were:
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010-2015 |
Total |
$
- |
$
- |
$
- |
$ - |
$ - |
$35 |
$35 |
The
provision for income taxes was different than would result from applying the
U.S. statutory rate to Profit before income taxes for the years ended December
31, for the reasons set forth in the following reconciliation:
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
Taxes
computed at U.S. statutory rates |
|
$ |
148 |
|
$ |
131 |
|
$ |
106 |
|
(Decreases)
increases in taxes resulting from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance
revenue not subject to federal taxation |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
(4 |
) |
|
(4 |
) |
State
income taxes, net of federal taxes |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
5 |
|
|
5 |
|
Subsidiaries'
results subject to tax rates other than
U.S.
statutory rates |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
(13 |
) |
|
4 |
|
Other,
net |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
1 |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
for income taxes |
|
$ |
137 |
|
$ |
120 |
|
$ |
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have
recorded income tax expense at U.S. tax rates on all profits, except for
undistributed profits of non-U.S. companies which are considered indefinitely
reinvested. Determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred tax
liability related to indefinitely reinvested profits is not
feasible.
Cat
Financial has net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards on several state income tax
returns. In some states, Cat Financial joins with Caterpillar Inc. in the filing
of a combined return. Caterpillar Inc. booked, on a consolidated basis, a
deferred state tax asset for the net tax benefit of state NOL carryovers, along
with the required disclosures. In other states, Cat Financial files on a
separate, stand alone basis. The net tax benefit associated with these returns
is $7 million as of year-end 2004, with an offsetting valuation allowance of $7
million. The valuation allowance arises as a result of litigation in some
states, administrative appeals in other states, and the uncertainty that the
carryovers will be able to be used in others.
In
December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 109-1 (FSP 109-1). FSP
109-1 provides accounting guidance for companies that will be eligible for a tax
deduction resulting from “qualified production activities income” as defined in
the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (Jobs Act). FSP 109-1 requires this
deduction should be treated as a special deduction in accordance with SFAS 109
“Accounting for Income Taxes.” The adoption of FSP 109-1 will not have a
material impact on our financial statements.
In
December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 109-2 (FSP 109-2). FSP
109-2 provides accounting guidance for the one-time tax deduction of 85% of
certain repatriated foreign earnings created by the Jobs Act. SFAS 109 requires
a company to reflect in the period of enactment the effect of a new tax law. Due
to the lack of clarification of certain provisions within the Jobs Act, FSP
109-2 allows companies time beyond the financial reporting period of enactment
to evaluate the effect of the Jobs Act. The adoption of FSP 109-2 will not have
a material impact on our financial statements.
The
components of Profit before income taxes for the years ended December 31, were
as follows:
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
U.S. |
|
$ |
273 |
|
$ |
246 |
|
$ |
221 |
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
151 |
|
|
130 |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
424 |
|
$ |
376 |
|
$ |
303 |
|
We use
the following methods and assumptions to estimate the fair value of our
financial instruments:
Assets
and liabilities other than those listed below -
carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Finance
receivables, net - fair
value is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using current rates for
new receivables with similar remaining maturities. Historical bad debts
experience is also considered.
Long-term
debt - fair
value is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using our current
borrowing rates for similar types and maturities of debt, except for floating
rate notes for which the carrying amount is considered a reasonable estimate of
fair value. For secured borrowings carrying value approximated fair
value.
Interest
rate swaps - fair
value is estimated based upon the amount we would receive or pay to terminate
the agreements as of December 31.
Foreign
currency forward and option contracts - fair
value of forward contracts was determined by discounting the future cash flow
resulting from the differential between the contract price and the forward rate.
Fair value of option contracts was determined by using the Black-Scholes
model.
Guarantees - fair
value is estimated based upon the premium we would require to issue the same
guarantee in a stand-alone
arm’s-length transaction with an unrelated party.
The
estimated fair values of financial instruments at December 31 are as
follows:
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
Carrying
Amount |
|
Fair
Value |
|
Carrying
Amount |
|
Fair
Value |
|
Carrying
Amount |
|
Fair
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance
receivables, net
(excluding tax leases (1)) |
|
$ |
18,167 |
|
$ |
18,119 |
|
$ |
13,260 |
|
$ |
13,294 |
|
$ |
11,717 |
|
$ |
11,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
debt |
|
$ |
(14,232 |
) |
$ |
(14,376 |
) |
$ |
(12,027 |
) |
$ |
(12,213 |
) |
$ |
(10,022 |
) |
$ |
(10,293 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
rate swaps: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In
a net receivable position |
|
$ |
75 |
|
$ |
75 |
|
$ |
87 |
|
$ |
87 |
|
$ |
84 |
|
$ |
84 |
|
In
a net payable position |
|
$ |
(69 |
) |
$ |
(69 |
) |
$ |
(59 |
) |
$ |
(59 |
) |
$ |
(85 |
) |
$ |
(85 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward
exchange contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In
a net gain position |
|
$ |
3 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
In
a net loss position |
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
$ |
(19 |
) |
$ |
(40 |
) |
$ |
(40 |
) |
$ |
(28 |
) |
$ |
(28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantees(2) |
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
$ |
(10 |
) |
$ |
(5 |
) |
$ |
(9 |
) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Excluded
items have a net carrying value of $1,737 at December 31, 2004, $1,546 at
December 31, 2003, and $1,369 at December 31,
2002. |
(2) |
The
carrying amount provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 45 related to
guarantees are effective for guarantees issued or modified subsequent to
December 31, 2002 only, whereas the fair value amount is for all
guarantees. |
We have a
Support Agreement with Caterpillar which provides that Caterpillar (1) will
remain, directly or indirectly, our sole owner, (2) cause us to maintain a net
worth of at least $20, and (3) ensure that we maintain a ratio of earnings and
interest expense to interest expense (as defined by the Support Agreement) of
not less than 1.15 to 1. In 2004, 2003, and 2002, Caterpillar did not make any
capital contributions. Although this agreement can be modified or terminated by
either party, any modification or termination which would adversely affect
holders of our debt is required to be approved by holders of 66-2/3% of the
aggregate outstanding debt. Caterpillar's obligation under this agreement is not
directly enforceable by any of our creditors and does not constitute a guarantee
of any of our obligations. There
were no cash dividends declared or paid to Caterpillar in 2004, 2003, or 2002.
The
rates/prices for our transactions with Caterpillar are set based on
arms-length
transactions.
We have
variable amount lending agreements with Caterpillar. Under these agreements, we
may borrow up to $1,650 from Caterpillar, and Caterpillar may borrow up to
$1,239 from us. The agreements are in effect for indefinite periods of time and
may be changed or terminated by either party with 30 days notice. Information
concerning these agreements is as follows:
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
Notes
payable at December 31, |
|
$ |
333 |
|
$ |
475 |
|
$ |
795 |
|
Notes
receivable at December 31, |
|
$ |
120 |
|
$ |
378 |
|
$ |
335 |
|
Interest
expensed |
|
$ |
11 |
|
$ |
12 |
|
$ |
10 |
|
Interest
earned |
|
$ |
10 |
|
$ |
7 |
|
$ |
7 |
|
We enter
into forward exchange contracts with Caterpillar to hedge our U.S. dollar
denominated positions in Australia against currency fluctuations. These
contracts have terms generally ranging up to three months. These contracts
totaled $6 at December 31, 2004, $8 at December 31, 2003, and $2 at December 31,
2002.
We have
agreements with Caterpillar to purchase, at a discount, certain receivables
generated by sales of products to Caterpillar dealers. Under these programs, we
use a portion of collections each week to purchase additional receivables.
Information pertaining to these purchases is as below:
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
Purchases
made |
|
$ |
17,741 |
|
$ |
12,957 |
|
$ |
11,564 |
|
Discounts
earned |
|
$ |
148 |
|
$ |
109 |
|
$ |
104 |
|
Servicing
fees paid |
|
$ |
3 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
Balance
at December 31, |
|
$ |
3,503 |
|
$ |
2,371 |
|
$ |
1,871 |
|
Effective
interest rate for additional weekly receivable purchases at December
31, |
|
|
5.05 |
% |
|
3.99 |
% |
|
4.44 |
% |
We
participate in certain marketing programs sponsored by Caterpillar by providing
financing to customers at rates below standard rates. Under these programs,
Caterpillar subsidizes an amount at the outset of the transaction, which we then
recognize as revenue over the term of the financing. During 2004, we received
$244 relative to such programs, compared with $173 in 2003 and $170 in 2002.
Caterpillar
provides us with certain operational and administrative support, which is
integral to the conduct of our business. Our employees are covered by various
benefit plans, including pension/post-retirement plans, administered by
Caterpillar. We reimburse Caterpillar for these charges, which amounted to $15
in 2004, $14 in 2003, and $12 in 2002. Other corporate services for which we
reimburse Caterpillar amounted to $16 in 2004, $13 in 2003, and $12 in
2002.
We
provide administrative support and office space to certain Caterpillar
subsidiaries. Caterpillar reimburses us for these charges, which amounted to $10
in 2004, $5 in 2003, and $6 in 2002.
We have a
tax sharing agreement with Caterpillar under which we combine our tax position
with Caterpillar's when appropriate. When we combine our tax positions under
this agreement, we pay to or receive from Caterpillar our allocated share of
income taxes or credits. In 2003, we received a one-time-only interest payment
of $9 from Caterpillar Inc. related to the intercompany effects of an audit
settlement with the Internal Revenue Service for several prior tax
years.
We lease
certain offices and other property through operating leases. Rental expense is
charged to operations as incurred. Total rental expense for operating leases was
$17 for 2004, 2003, and 2002. At December 31, 2004, minimum payments for
operating leases having initial or remaining non-cancelable terms in excess of
one year are:
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
$ |
13 |
|
2006 |
|
|
12
|
|
2007 |
|
|
11
|
|
2008 |
|
|
11
|
|
2009 |
|
|
10
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
43
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
100 |
|
Basis
for segment information
Our
segment data is based on disclosure requirements of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 131, which requires that financial information be
reported on the basis that is used internally for measuring segment performance.
Internally, we report information for operating segments based on management
responsibility. The five segments offer primarily the same types of services
(see Note 1).
On
January 1, 2004, Cat Power Finance was reclassified from North America and
Diversified Services into a separate segment. On January 1, 2003, we reassigned
the Marine services division in Europe from the Europe segment to the
Diversified Services segment. Prior year information has been reclassified to
conform to the new structure. We segregate information as follows:
· |
North
America: We have offices in the United States and Canada that serve local
dealers and customers. |
· |
Europe:
We have offices in Europe to serve European dealers and customers. This
segment also includes our office in Russia, which serves dealers and
customers in the Commonwealth of Independent
States. |
· |
Asia-Pacific:
We have offices in Australia, New Zealand, and Asia that serve local
dealers and customers. |
· |
Diversified
Services: Included is our Global Accounts Division, which primarily
provides cross-border financing to customers in countries in which we have
no local presence; Marine Services, which primarily finances marine
vessels with Caterpillar engines for all countries; and our offices in
Latin America that serve local dealers and customers.
|
· |
Cat
Power Finance: This division primarily finances Cat electrical power
generation, gas compression and co-generation systems, as well as non-Cat
equipment powered by Cat engines for all countries.
|
Debt and
other expenses for the Global Accounts, Marine Services and Cat Power Finance
divisions are allocated to their respective segments from the North America,
Europe, and/or Asia-Pacific segments based on their respective portfolios. The
related interest expense is calculated based on the amount of allocated debt at
current market rates. Inter-segment revenues are also based on current market
rates.
The
financial data is presented in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. Inter-segment amounts, reflected in
the tables, result principally from lending activities between segments. A
smaller amount results from charges between segments for services
provided.
2004 |
|
|
North
America |
|
|
Europe |
|
|
Asia-
Pacific |
|
|
Diversified
Services |
|
|
Cat
Power Finance |
|
|
Total |
|
External
revenue |
|
$ |
1,133 |
|
|
344 |
|
|
139 |
|
|
243 |
|
|
65 |
|
$ |
1,924 |
|
Inter-segment
revenue |
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
$ |
21 |
|
Profit |
|
$ |
164 |
|
|
50 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
43 |
|
|
15 |
|
$ |
287 |
|
Interest
expense |
|
$ |
302 |
|
|
85 |
|
|
40 |
|
|
98 |
|
|
28 |
|
$ |
553 |
|
Depreciation
expense |
|
$ |
398 |
|
|
116 |
|
|
49 |
|
|
30 |
|
|
4 |
|
$ |
597 |
|
Provision
for income taxes |
|
$ |
89 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
5 |
|
$ |
137 |
|
Assets |
|
$ |
13,366 |
|
|
4,641 |
|
|
1,689 |
|
|
4,624 |
|
|
1,328 |
|
$ |
25,648 |
|
Expenditures
for equipment on operating leases and for non-leased
equipment |
|
$ |
831 |
|
|
163 |
|
|
119 |
|
|
110 |
|
|
5 |
|
$ |
1,228 |
|
2003 |
|
|
North
America |
|
|
Europe |
|
|
Asia-
Pacific |
|
|
Diversified
Services |
|
|
Cat
Power Finance |
|
|
Total |
|
External
revenue |
|
$ |
1,022 |
|
|
316 |
|
|
96 |
|
|
247 |
|
|
55 |
|
$ |
1,736 |
|
Inter-segment
revenue |
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
$ |
18 |
|
Profit |
|
$ |
122 |
|
|
53 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
54 |
|
|
17 |
|
$ |
256 |
|
Interest
expense |
|
$ |
297 |
|
|
79 |
|
|
25 |
|
|
80 |
|
|
20 |
|
$ |
501 |
|
Depreciation
expense |
|
$ |
350 |
|
|
110 |
|
|
36 |
|
|
46 |
|
|
5 |
|
$ |
547 |
|
Provision
for income taxes |
|
$ |
79 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
7 |
|
$ |
120 |
|
Assets |
|
$ |
11,523 |
|
|
4,088 |
|
|
1,147 |
|
|
4,329 |
|
|
1,036 |
|
$ |
22,123 |
|
Expenditures
for equipment on operating leases and for non-leased
equipment |
|
$ |
654 |
|
|
197 |
|
|
147 |
|
|
130 |
|
|
8 |
|
$ |
1,136 |
|
2002 |
|
|
North
America |
|
|
Europe |
|
|
Asia-
Pacific |
|
|
Diversified
Services |
|
|
Cat
Power Finance |
|
|
Total |
|
External
revenue |
|
$ |
1,003 |
|
|
262 |
|
|
63 |
|
|
207 |
|
|
47 |
|
$ |
1,582 |
|
Inter-segment
revenue |
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
$ |
23 |
|
Profit |
|
$ |
128 |
|
|
26 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
25 |
|
|
11 |
|
$ |
193 |
|
Interest
expense |
|
$ |
379 |
|
|
84 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
70 |
|
|
15 |
|
$ |
567 |
|
Depreciation
expense |
|
$ |
289 |
|
|
89 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
29 |
|
|
5 |
|
$ |
434 |
|
Provision
for income taxes |
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
6 |
|
$ |
110 |
|
Assets |
|
$ |
10,805 |
|
|
3,208 |
|
|
756 |
|
|
3,657 |
|
|
651 |
|
$ |
19,077 |
|
Expenditures
for equipment on operating leases and for non-leased
equipment |
|
$ |
578 |
|
|
171 |
|
|
98 |
|
|
223 |
|
|
5 |
|
$ |
1,075 |
|
Reconciliation:
Interest
expense |
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
Interest
expense from segments |
|
$ |
553 |
|
$ |
501 |
|
$ |
567 |
|
Inter-segment
interest expense |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
(18 |
) |
|
(23 |
) |
Total |
|
$ |
532 |
|
$ |
483 |
|
$ |
544 |
|
Assets |
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
Assets
from segments |
|
$ |
25,648 |
|
$ |
22,123 |
|
$ |
19,077 |
|
Investment
in subsidiaries |
|
|
(925 |
) |
|
(893 |
) |
|
(702 |
) |
Inter-segment
balances |
|
|
(1,151 |
) |
|
(1,239 |
) |
|
(1,270 |
) |
Total |
|
$ |
23,572 |
|
$ |
19,991 |
|
$ |
17,105 |
|
Inside
and outside the United States:
Revenue |
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
2002
|
|
Inside
U.S. |
|
$1,193 |
|
$1,129 |
|
$1,110 |
|
Outside
U.S. |
|
731 |
|
607 |
|
472 |
|
Total |
|
1,924 |
|
1,736 |
|
1,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment
on Operating Leases and Non-Leased Equipment, Net |
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
Inside
U.S. |
|
$ |
1,492 |
|
$ |
1,430 |
|
$ |
1,355 |
|
Outside
U.S. |
|
|
1,191 |
|
|
985 |
|
|
697 |
|
Total |
|
|
2,683 |
|
|
2,415 |
|
|
2,052 |
|
2004 |
|
|
First
quarter |
|
|
Second
quarter |
|
|
Third
quarter |
|
|
Fourth
quarter |
|
Total
revenues |
|
$ |
457 |
|
$ |
467 |
|
$ |
476 |
|
$ |
524 |
|
Profit
before taxes |
|
$ |
107 |
|
$ |
97 |
|
$ |
113 |
|
$ |
107 |
|
Profit |
|
$ |
72 |
|
$ |
63 |
|
$ |
82 |
|
$ |
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
revenues |
|
$ |
403 |
|
$ |
445 |
|
$ |
445 |
|
$ |
443 |
|
Profit
before taxes |
|
$ |
78 |
|
$ |
108 |
|
$ |
103 |
|
$ |
87 |
|
Profit |
|
$ |
51 |
|
$ |
71 |
|
$ |
67 |
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
revenues |
|
$ |
380 |
|
$ |
382 |
|
$ |
416 |
|
$ |
404 |
|
Profit
before taxes |
|
$ |
84 |
|
$ |
63 |
|
$ |
88 |
|
$ |
68 |
|
Profit |
|
$ |
53 |
|
$ |
40 |
|
$ |
56 |
|
$ |
44 |
|