UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13
OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly
period ended November 30, 2003
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR
15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the
transition period from ________ to ___________
Commission file number: 0-1460
ANDERSEN
GROUP, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 06-0659863 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
405 Park Avenue, Suite 1202, New York, New York | 10022 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(212) 826-8942 | |
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code) |
Indicate by check mark
whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the
past 90 days. Yes x No ____
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ____ No x
As of January 14, 2004 there were 2,099,908 shares of the
Registrant's $0.01 par value common stock outstanding.
Title |
Outstanding |
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share |
Authorized 15,000,000 shares; Issued 2,099,908 |
ANDERSEN
GROUP, INC.
FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
2
Part
I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
ANDERSEN GROUP, INC.
Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets
(In thousands)
November 30, 2003 |
February 28, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ 1,153 |
$ 6,279 |
Marketable securities |
3,841 |
1,809 |
Accounts and other receivables less allowances of $40 and $25, respectively |
202 |
48 |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
34 |
242 |
|
|
|
Total current assets |
5,230 |
8,378 |
Property, plant and equipment, net |
3,266 |
3,403 |
Prepaid pension expense |
4,717 |
4,591 |
Investment in ComCor-TV |
3,500 |
- |
Investment in Moscow Broadband Communication Ltd. |
1,483 |
1,971 |
Other assets |
297 |
702 |
|
|
|
$ 18,493 |
$ 19,045 |
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
$ 598 |
$ 407 |
Accounts payable |
232 |
288 |
Other current liabilities |
700 |
907 |
Deferred income taxes |
538 |
132 |
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
2,068 |
1,734 |
|
|
|
Long-term debt, less current maturities |
2,983 |
1,674 |
Other liabilities |
456 |
867 |
Deferred income taxes |
1,551 |
1,668 |
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
7,058 |
5,943 |
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders' equity: |
|
|
Cumulative convertible preferred stock |
3,497 |
3,497 |
Common stock |
21 |
21 |
Additional paid-in capital |
6,653 |
6,653 |
Retained earnings |
1,264 |
2,931 |
|
|
|
|
11,435 |
13,102 |
|
|
|
Total stockholders' equity |
$ 18,493 |
$ 19,045 |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.
3
ANDERSEN GROUP,
INC.
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
Three months ended November 30, |
|
Nine months ended November 30, |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
2003 |
2002 |
|
2003 |
2002 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Revenues |
$ - |
$ - |
|
$ - |
$ - |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
General and administrative |
658 |
693 |
|
2,129 |
1,989 |
|||
Interest expense |
65 |
65 |
|
184 |
201 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
723 |
758 |
|
2,313 |
2,190 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Investment income and other income |
473 |
322 |
|
1,418 |
608 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Loss from continuing operations before equity in losses of Moscow Broadband |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Equity in losses of Moscow Broadband |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net loss from continuing operations before |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Income tax (benefit) expense |
(32) |
(135) |
|
72 |
(551) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net loss from continuing operations |
(385) |
(473) |
|
(1,455) |
(1,543) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Income from discontinued segment, net of |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Gain on sale of discontinued segment, net of |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net (loss) income |
(385) |
(473) |
|
(1,455) |
61 |
|||
Preferred dividends |
(71) |
(71) |
|
(212) |
(212) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Loss applicable to common shares |
$ (456) |
$ (544) |
|
$ (1,667) |
$ (151) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
(Loss) Earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Basic and diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net loss from continuing operations |
$ (0.22) |
$ (0.26) |
|
$ (0.80) |
$ (0.83) |
|||
Income from discontinued operations |
- |
- |
|
- |
0.06 |
|||
Gain on sale of discontinued operations |
- |
- |
|
- |
0.70 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
$ (0.22) |
$ (0.26) |
|
$ (0.80) |
$ (0.07) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.
4
ANDERSEN
GROUP, INC.
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
(unaudited)
Nine Months ended |
||
|
||
|
November 30, 2003 |
November 30, 2002 |
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
Net (loss) income |
$ (1,455) |
$ 61 |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
Equity in losses of Moscow Broadband Communication Ltd. |
488 |
512 |
Gain on sale of JM Ney's operating assets |
- |
(1,472) |
Gain on settlement of retiree healthcare liability |
- |
(142) |
Depreciation, amortization and accretion |
182 |
235 |
Deferred income taxes |
289 |
(75) |
Pension income |
(126) |
(149) |
Net gains from marketable securities and investments |
(1,032) |
(319) |
Purchases of marketable securities |
(1,000) |
(700) |
Proceeds from sales of marketable securities |
- |
141 |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities net of charges from sale of JM Ney's net assets: |
|
|
Accounts and other receivables |
(154) |
3,780 |
Inventories |
- |
(419) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
203 |
639 |
Accounts payable |
(56) |
(640) |
Accrued expenses and other long-term obligations |
(177) |
(1,448) |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
(2,838) |
4 |
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
Investment in ComCor-TV |
(3,500) |
- |
Purchases of property and equipment, net |
(42) |
(9) |
Proceeds from sale of JM Ney, net of escrow |
- |
10,390 |
Transaction expenses paid |
- |
(1,172) |
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
(3,542) |
9,209 |
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
Principal payments on long-term debt |
(500) |
(499) |
Proceeds from mortgage loan, net |
1,966 |
- |
Repayment of short-term debt, net |
- |
(2,366) |
Purchase of subsidiary warrants |
- |
(160) |
Stock options exercised |
- |
34 |
Preferred dividends paid |
(212) |
(212) |
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
1,254 |
(3,203) |
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
(5,126) |
6,010 |
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period |
6,279 |
1,152 |
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents - end of period |
$ 1,153 |
$ 7,162 |
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. |
5
ANDERSEN GROUP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements (unaudited)
(1) Accounting Policies
The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements and related notes should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements of Andersen Group, Inc. (the "Company") and related notes as contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2003. The interim financial statements include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) and accruals necessary in the judgment of management for a fair presentation of such statements. The Company has incurred and expects in the near future to continue to incur operating losses. Management believes that unless the Company is able to secure additional financing, its cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments will not be sufficient to enable it to meet its operating expense and debt service requirements for the next twelve months and also the funding requirements into ZAO ComCor-TV ("CCTV") as set forth in the Subscription Agreement with Moscow Telecommunications Corporation ("COMCOR") (see note 5) which it expects to enter into during the fourth quarter of the current fiscal year. Accordingly, if this contingency has not been resolved prior to August 31, 2004, the Company expects that it may not make all of the capital contributions to CCTV which the Company will be committed to make upon the closing of the acquisition of CCTV.
The accompanying interim consolidated financial statements reflect the Company's belief that it can continue as a going concern, and its belief that CCTV can continue as a going concern which are, in turn, based on the belief that both the Company and CCTV can continue with its existing resources or upon the likelihood that additional capital resources can be obtained to support both the Company's and CCTV's operating plans. If management's assessments are incorrect, the Company may be required to reduce the reported values of certain assets and incur additional expenses. The accompanying interim consolidated financial statements do not provide for such loss contingencies.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
In January 2003, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Interpretation
No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (VIE), an interpretation of
ARB No. 51, which requires all VIEs to be consolidated by the primary
beneficiary. The primary beneficiary is
the entity that holds the majority of the beneficial interests in the VIE. In addition, the interpretation expands
disclosure requirements for both VIEs that are consolidated as well as VIEs
from which the entity is the holder of a significant amount of the beneficial
interests, but not the majority. The
disclosure requirements of this interpretation are effective for all financial
statements issued after January 31, 2003.
The consolidation requirements of this interpretation have recently been
deferred and are now effective for all periods ending no later than March 15,
2004. Because the Company believes it
has no variable interest entities, it does not expect that the adoption of this
new standard will have an effect on the consolidated financial position or
results of operations.
In April 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 149 ("SFAS 149"), "Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." SFAS 149 amends Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 to provide clarification on the financial accounting and reporting of derivative instruments and hedging activities and requires that contracts with similar characteristics be accounted for on a comparable basis. The provisions of SFAS 149 are effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003, and for hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. SFAS 149 has no material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements as of or for the period ended November 30, 2003.
In May 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 150 ("SFAS 150"), "Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity." SFAS 150 establishes standards on the classification and measurement of certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. The provisions of SFAS 150 are effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and to all other instruments that exist as of the beginning of the first interim financial reporting period beginning after June 15, 2003. SFAS 150 has no material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements as of or for the period ended November 30, 2003.
Stock-based
Compensation Plans
The Company follows Accounting Principles Board Opinion No.
25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" and related
Interpretations, in accounting for its stock-based compensation plans and has
elected to continue to use the intrinsic value-based method to account for
stock option grants. The Company
adopted the disclosure-only provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 148 ("SFAS 148"), "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
- - Transition and Disclosure", an amendment of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123 ("SFAS 123"). Accordingly, no compensation expense has been recognized for the
Company's stock-based compensation plans.
Had the Company elected to recognize compensation expense based upon the
fair value at the grant dates for awards under these plans, net loss and
6
loss per share would have been unchanged from amounts as presented because the Company has not granted any stock based compensation awards since FY01.
(2) Investment in ComCor-TV
On May 30, 2003, the Company invested $3,500,000 into CCTV to the terms of the agreements reached with COMCOR under which the Company plans to acquire 100% of the equity interests of CCTV through the issuance of common stock to COMCOR in exchange for COMCOR's equity interest in CCTV, and the exchange of its common stock for the outstanding stock of Moscow Broadband Communication Ltd ("Moscow Broadband") that it does not already own. The Company has recorded this investment at its cost basis. See Note 4 for additional discussion of the proposed transactions.
(3) Investment in Moscow Broadband Communication Ltd.
The Company records its investment in Moscow Broadband using the equity method of accounting. The Company's fiscal year ends on February 28/29, while Moscow Broadband has a December 31 year end. As a result, the Company's equity in Moscow Broadband's results is reported on a two-month lag. For the nine-month periods ended November 30, 2003 and 2002, the Company recorded losses of $488,000 and $512,000, respectively, which represent its 25% interest in Moscow Broadband's losses of $1,952,000 and $2,047,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. These losses include Moscow Broadband's 50% equity interest in the losses of CCTV for the same periods.
At November 30, 2003, the carrying value of the Company's investment in Moscow Broadband was $1,483,000, and the Company's 25% equity interest in the net assets of Moscow Broadband was $1,864,000. The $381,000 difference is attributed to a non-depreciable asset that was contributed to CCTV and will not result in the Company accreting the difference into its consolidated results of operations.
The following presents summarized financial information for Moscow Broadband as of September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 and its results of operations for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 (in thousands):
September 30, 2003 |
December 31, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data: |
||
Current assets |
$ 315 |
$ 557 |
Noncurrent assets |
7,181 |
8,903 |
|
|
|
Total assets |
$ 7,496 |
$ 9,460 |
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
$ 40 |
$ 52 |
Stockholders' equity |
7,456 |
9,408 |
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity |
$ 7,456 |
$ 9,460 |
|
|
|
Three Months
Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
||
|
|
||||
2003 |
2002 |
|
2003 |
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Statement of Operations Data: |
|
||||
Net loss before equity in losses of ComCor-TV |
$ (96) |
$ (60) |
|
$ (232) |
$ (340) |
Equity in losses of ComCor-TV |
(574) |
(627) |
|
(1,720) |
(1,707) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
$ (670) |
$ (687) |
|
$ (1,952) |
$ (2,047) |
|
|
|
|
7
The following presents summarized financial information for CCTV as of September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 and for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 (in thousands):
September 30, 2003 | December 31, 2003 | |
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data: |
|
|
Current assets |
$ 6,542 |
$ 6,104 |
Non-current assets |
28,649 |
28,496 |
|
|
|
Total assets |
$ 35,191 |
$ 34,510 |
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
$ 3,957 |
$ 3,124 |
Non-current liabilities and minority interest |
1,632 |
1,844 |
Stockholder's equity |
29,602 |
29,542 |
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity |
$ 35,191 |
$ 34,510 |
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|||
|
|
||||
2003 |
2002 |
|
2003 |
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Statement of Operations Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
Subscription fees |
$ 645 |
$ 317 |
|
$ 1,781 |
$ 930 |
Connection fees and equipment and other sales |
200 |
126 |
|
628 |
378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
845 |
443 |
|
2,409 |
1,308 |
Cost of
revenues, including |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
(701) |
(823) |
|
(2,238) |
(2,259) |
|
|
|
|
||
Loss from operations |
(1,044) |
(1,262) |
|
(3,329) |
(3,486) |
Equity in losses of unconsolidated subsidiary |
(167) |
(42) |
|
(251) |
(42) |
Other non-operating items, net |
(7) |
(12) |
|
(6971) |
(77) |
|
|
|
|
||
Net loss before income taxes |
(1,218) |
(1,316) |
|
(3,649) |
(3,605) |
Income tax benefit |
71 |
64 |
|
209 |
193 |
|
|
|
|
||
Net loss |
$ (1,147) |
$ (1,252) |
|
$ (3,440) |
$ (3,412) |
|
|
|
|
(4) ComCor-TV and Moscow Broadband Transactions
In May 2003, the Company entered into agreements with COMCOR pursuant to which the Company expects to acquire control over 100% of the equity ownership of CCTV through (i) the purchase of CCTV equity held and to be acquired by COMCOR and (ii) the acquisition of the 75% of Moscow Broadband which the Company had not previously owned. The agreements with COMCOR call for the Company to issue 4,220,879 shares of its common stock to COMCOR in exchange for the equity of CCTV to be held by COMCOR, including the equity of CCTV to be acquired by COMCOR in exchange for the extinguishment of approximately $1,380,500 of amounts owed or expected to be owed to COMCOR from CCTV. On October 27, 2003, the Company's stockholders approved the issuance of the shares of the Company's common stock to effect the transactions, and in December 2003, the Ministry of the Russian Federation on Anti-monopoly Policy granted its approval of the transaction. COMCOR is presently awaiting approval to allow it to directly own shares of the Company's stock, after which, if received, the company expects to be able to complete the acquisition within a matter of days.
8
In connection with the COMCOR agreements, the Company made a $3.5 million investment into CCTV on May 30, 2003 and upon closing the agreements, it will be committed to making; i) a $1.0 million investment in CCTV within 20 days of the closing of the acquisition of the CCTV shares; and ii) a $1.5 million investment into CCTV at the earlier of the closing of a rights offering or August 31, 2004. The COMCOR agreements also provide for an additional $5,829,000 of capital contributions to CCTV from the Company prior to March 31, 2005. If such contributions are not made, then the Company will be obligated to issue up to 477,994 additional shares of its common stock to COMCOR.
Pursuant to agreements signed effective April 1, 2003, COMCOR also agreed to eliminate the fee it charged CCTV for transportation network services from CCTV's utilization of the Moscow Fiber Optic Network that had been charged at the rate of 10% of CCTV's television service revenue. COMCOR also agreed to limit CCTV's payment obligations for the lease of secondary node switching stations to the lesser of i) $350 per secondary node per month as invoiced by COMCOR and ii) 20% of CCTV's television service revenues, calculated on a cumulative basis beginning January 1, 2003. At September 30, 2003, CCTV was utilizing 225 of COMCOR's secondary nodes. To make this existing network more cost efficient, CCTV plans to reduce the use of up to 37 of these nodes within the next few months. CCTV also plans to lease additional secondary nodes from COMCOR as further buildout of its access network occurs.
Concurrent with the closing of the proposed acquisition of CCTV equity from COMCOR, the Company intends to acquire the 75% of the MBC equity that it does not currently own in exchange for 2,250,000 shares of Company common stock. In addition to the planned $1.0 million cash investment into CCTV to be made after the closing of the transactions, to partially satisfy its additional funding requirements discussed above, the Company also intends to contribute approximately $1,250,000 to CCTV, which is comprised of (i) the contribution of Moscow Broadband's loans and advances to CCTV; (ii) 4,402 shares of the stock of the Institute for Automated Systems; and (iii) the extinguishment of a $138,144 liability of CCTV through the issuance of 33,427 shares of the Company's common stock. Such contributions would reduce the number of shares of the Company's common stock that the Company would be obligated to issue to COMCOR, in the absence of any other qualifying contributions made by the Company to CCTV, from 477,994 to 374,941. The agreements further call for the Company to maintain the right to name four of the seven members of the Company's Board of Directors and for COMCOR to name the remaining three pursuant to the terms of a Voting Agreement to be entered into upon the closing of the transactions among COMCOR, Oliver R. Grace, Jr., the Company's President, and Francis E. Baker, the Company's Chairman, to support the continuation of the Company's control over the corporate governance of the Company for an 18-month period.
(5) Mortgage Loan
In June 2003, Andersen Land Corp. ("Andersen Land"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company formerly known as The J.M. Ney Company, entered into a seven-year $2.0 million mortgage agreement secured by Andersen Land's real estate property and an assignment of rents from the lease agreement entered into with the buyer of JM Ney's operating assets. Andersen Land provided the proceeds of this loan to the Company to assist the Company in meeting its cash flow obligations.
(6) Income Taxes
Income tax benefit represents an estimate of the effective income tax rate for the current fiscal year after considering valuation allowances with respect to the Company's ability to realize a tax benefit from its equity in the losses of Moscow Broadband and the extent of the Company's ability to utilize current year losses to recover previously paid income taxes.
(7) Loss Per Share
Loss per share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock and common stock equivalents outstanding. Diluted loss per share assumes full conversion of all convertible securities into common stock at the later of the beginning of the year or date of issuance, unless antidilutive. For the three and nine month periods ended November 30, 2003 and 2002, the effect of the assumed conversion of the Company's dilutive securities had an antidilutive effect on the Company's per share results from continuing operations.
9
Three months ended November 30, |
|
Nine months ended November 30, |
|||
|
|
||||
2003 |
2002 |
|
2003 |
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Calculation of basic loss per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Numerator for basic and diluted loss per share: |
|
||||
Net loss |
$ (456) |
$ (544) |
|
$ (1,667) |
$ (151) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period |
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted loss per share |
2,100 |
2,100 |
|
2,100 |
2,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per share |
$ (0.22) |
$ (0.26) |
|
$ (0.80) |
$ (0.07) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per share |
$ (0.22) |
$ (0.26) |
|
$ (0.80) |
$ (0.07) |
|
|
|
|
Item. 2 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The accompanying Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ("MD&A") should be read in conjunction with the MD&A in the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2003.
Overview
The Company is a holding company which holds a 25% ownership interest
in Moscow Broadband which in turn holds 50% voting control over CCTV, a Russian
company that delivers cable television, high speed data transmission and
Internet services to its customers in Moscow, Russia. CCTV is a start-up business that is currently expanding its
network and attempting to increase its customer base.
In May 2003, the Company entered into agreements with COMCOR, that, upon
closing, will result in CCTV becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company. These agreements call for the
issuance of 6,470,879 shares of the Company's common stock in exchange for the
equity interest of CCTV to be held by COMCOR, and for the 75% of Moscow
Broadband not presently owned by the Company.
On October 27, 2003, the Company obtained the approval of the Company's
stockholders to issue shares of its common stock to effect the transactions. In addition, the Company will be
contingently liable to issue up to an additional 477,994 shares of its common
stock if certain financing commitments are not made.
The Company also has a trading portfolio of equity investments of domestic and
foreign-based companies, which at November 30, 2003 was valued at $3,841,000.
From 1991 until March 22, 2002, the Company owned and operated JM Ney as its
primary operating subsidiary. The
operating assets of JM Ney were sold during the first quarter of FY03 and the
net current assets of JM Ney which were not sold were substantially
liquidated. The Company retained
ownership of JM Ney's facility which it leases to the buyer of JM Ney's
operating assets under terms of an eight-year lease which was negotiated in
connection with the sale of JM Ney's net assets.
Due to the proposed acquisition of CCTV, and the sale of JM Ney, the following
discussion and analysis of the results of operations and the financial
condition of the Company is not indicative of the Company's expectations of its
future results of operations.
10
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The MD&A discusses the Company's consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to bad debts, investments, income taxes, financing operations, retirement benefits, and contingencies and litigation. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Management believes the following critical accounting policies, among others, affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements:
Deferred Tax Assets
The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred tax assets to the amount that it believes is more likely than not to be realized. The Company considers future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance. When the Company determines that it may not be able to realize all or part of its net deferred tax assets, a valuation allowance to reduce the deferred tax assets to estimated recoverable amounts is charged to income in the period such determination is made. Likewise, should the Company determine that it would be able to realize its deferred tax assets in the future in excess of its net recorded amount, a reduction in the valuation allowance would increase income in the period such determination is made.
Investments in Moscow Broadband and CCTV
The Company records its investment in Moscow Broadband using the equity
method which also requires that the carrying value of the investment be
evaluated for impairment. The Company
records its investment in CCTV at cost until the closing of the transactions,
at which time both investments will be included within the cost basis of CCTV
as a consolidated subsidiary of the Company.
The ability for the Company to consummate the proposed transactions and
the ability of CCTV to meet its obligations and to continue to grow its
revenues will be determining factors in continuing impairment evaluations. At this time, Company management believes
that there should not be an impairment of these assets recorded as of November
30, 2003.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2003 VS. THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2002
For the nine months ended November 30, 2003 and 2002 the Company reported net loss as follows (in thousands except per share amounts):
November 30, 2003 |
November 30, 2002 |
|||
|
|
|||
Amount |
Per Share |
Amount |
Per Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
$ (1,667) |
$ (0.80) |
$ (1,755) |
$ (0.83) |
Net income from discontinued operations |
- |
- |
132 |
0.06 |
Gain on sale of JM Ney |
- |
- |
1,472 |
0.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ (1,667) |
$ (0.80) |
$ (151) |
$ (0.07) |
|
|
|
|
|
11
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses from continuing
operations increased 7.0% to $2,129,000 for the nine months ended November 30,
2003, from $1,989,000 in the comparable period in the prior fiscal year. For
the three months ended November 30, 2003, these expenses totaled $658,000,
which was 5.1% less than the $693,000 of general and administrative expenses
incurred in the comparable three-month period in the prior fiscal year. The year-to-date increase is due to higher
deferred compensation costs attributable to increases in the value of assets in
trust accounts which has also resulted in higher investment income and other
income as noted later. In addition, a
gain on the settlement of post retirement liabilities realized in the prior
year did not recur in the current fiscal year.
The three-month expense decrease is primarily due to lower professional
fees as a result of less effort to negotiate and document the transactions
which were reached in final form in May 2003, which were partially offset by
increases in compensation expense.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for the nine months ended November 30, 2003 decreased 8.5%
to $184,000 from $201,000 during the comparable period in the prior fiscal
year. For the three months ended
November 30, 2003, interest expense totaled $65,000, which was essentially
unchanged from the interest expense incurred in the comparable three-month
period in the prior fiscal year. Annual
sinking fund payments of the Company's 10 1/2% convertible subordinated
debenture have served to lower interest costs, which have been offset by
interest on a mortgage loan which was entered into in June 2003.
Three Months Ended |
Nine Months Ended |
||||
|
|
||||
November 30, 2003 |
November 30, 2002 |
|
November 30, 2003 |
November 30, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net gains from domestic trading portfolio |
$ 348 |
$ 206 |
|
$ 1,032 |
$ 311 |
Rental income |
78 |
78 |
|
233 |
214 |
Interest and dividends |
27 |
44 |
|
53 |
113 |
Ultrasonic royalties |
19 |
13 |
|
54 |
37 |
Change in deferred compensation accounts |
1 |
(19) |
|
46 |
(67) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 473 |
$ 322 |
|
$ 1,418 |
$ 608 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in Losses of Moscow Broadband
The Company's equity in the losses of Moscow Broadband decreased 2.9% to
$167,000 for the three months ended November 30, 2003 from $172,000 in the
comparable period of the prior fiscal year, and decreased 4.7% to $488,000 for
the nine months then ended from $512,000 recorded in the prior fiscal
year. These represent the Company's
equity in MBC's results of operations for the three and nine-month periods
ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, as follows (in thousands):
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|||
|
|
||||
2003 |
2002 |
|
2003 |
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
MBC's operating losses |
$ (96) |
$ (60) |
|
$ (232) |
$ (340) |
MBC's equity in CCTV's losses |
(574) |
(627) |
|
(1,720) |
(1,707) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total MBC loss |
$ (670) |
$ (687) |
|
$ (1,952) |
$ (2,047) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andersen equity portion - 25% |
$ (167) |
$ (172) |
|
$ (488) |
$ (512) |
|
|
|
|
12
MBC's year-to-date net operating loss declined primarily due to a
decrease of $75,000 in consulting costs which had been incurred during 2002 in
connection with the process to try to raise additional equity for MBC. Such cost savings were partially offset by a
$35,000 decrease in interest income, due to lower cash being available for
short term investments as a result of the May 2002 investment of $5 million
into CCTV, and the use of cash for MBC's operating expenses. MBC's equity in the losses of CCTV for the
three months ended September 30, 2003 were reduced by 8.5% from the prior
year's third quarter and were approximately 0.8% higher for the nine-month
period from the prior year's comparable period. CCTV's results of operations for the three and six months ended June
30, 2003 and 2002, and MBC's equity in these results were comprised as follows
(in thousands): Three months ended
September 30, Nine months ended
September 30, 2003 2002 2003 2002 Subscription fees $ 645 $ 318 $ 1,781 $ 930 Connection fees, equipment and other
Total
revenues 845 443 2,409 1,308 Cost of sales 1,188 1,010 3,500 2,669 Gross margin deficit (343) (567) (1,091) (1,361) Operating expenses 701 695 2,238 2,125 Loss from operations (1,044) (1,262) (3,329) (3,486) Equity in losses of unconsolidated Other non-operating items, net (7) (10) (69) (75) Net loss before income taxes (1,218) (1,316) (3,649) (3,605) Income tax benefit 71 64 209 193 Net loss $
(1,147) $
(1,252) $
(3,440) $
(3,412) MBC equity portion - 50% $
(574) $
(627) $
(1,720) $
(1,707) CCTV's subscription fees for television and Internet access services
for the three months ended September 30, 2003 increased by 104.0% over the
comparable period in the prior year as a result of increased subscription
levels both from increased market penetration in areas which it had access to
in the prior year, and from new subscribers in areas to which it has expanded
in the last year. Year-to-date, such
revenues were 91.5% higher than the prior year for the same reasons. At September 30, 2003, CCTV reported that it had 52,643 subscribers
from its broadcasting and premium television services and 7,932 subscribers for
its Internet access services. These
represent increases of 38.4% and 92.9% respectively over the number of
subscribers it had reported as of September 30, 2002. As a result, subscription fees for television services for
three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2003 increased 69.3% and
55.8% respectively over the comparable periods in the prior year, and revenues
from Internet access services for the three and nine-month periods increased
126.3% and 115.2%, respectively, over the prior year's comparable periods. Growth of subscription fee revenues for
television services and Internet access services increased only 10.3% and 2.6%,
respectively, from the second quarter levels, primarily due to a higher level
of seasonal disconnections in July and August, which was offset by strong
subscriber growth and reconnections of inactive customers in the month of
September. 13
CCTV's cost of sales for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2003, increased 17.6% and 31.1%, respectively over the comparable periods in
the prior year primarily as a result of utilization fees and lease of secondary
node fees from COMCOR which were not present in the prior year until August
2002 and to increased depreciation expense relating to assets contributed by
COMCOR in July 2002 and additional network buildout. CCTV's general and administrative expenses for the three and nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2003 increased 0.9% and 5.3% respective in over the comparable year period due to
depreciation on assets contributed by COMCOR in July 2002. Income Tax (Benefit)
Expense Gain on Sale of JM Ney At November 30, 2003, consolidated cash and marketable securities
totaled $4,994,000 as compared to $8,088,000 as of February 28, 2003. The decrease of $3,094,000 is primarily
attributable to the use of cash to fund the Company's $3,500,000 investment in
CCTV and from the use of $806,000 of cash in its operating activities, net of
new investments in, and appreciation of
the values of marketable securities. In
addition, $1,254,000 of cash was provided by financing activities from the proceeds
of a mortgage loan less principal payments of this loan and the annual sinking
fund payment of the Company's 10 ½% Subordinated Debentures and the payment of
$212,000 of preferred dividends. The agreements which the Company entered into in May 2003 under which
it proposes to acquire 100% of CCTV, require the Company to make additional
cash investments in CCTV totaling $2.5 million by August 31, 2004, of which
$1.0 million is expected to be made at the closing of the acquisition, which
the Company expects will occur during its fourth fiscal quarter. The Company's present resources, including the trading portfolio of
equity securities, are not expected to be adequate for the Company to meet the
defined CCTV funding requirements and its continuing operating expense, debt
service and preferred dividend payment obligations for more than 12
months. The agreements entered into with COMCOR contemplate the use of proceeds
of a private placement or other offering of Company debt or equity
securities. Such events, if they were
to occur, would provide the Company with additional liquidity to support its
and CCTV's business objectives. The
Company has plans to undertake capital raising activities, but there can be no
assurance that such activities will be successful. If such activities are not successful, and absent alternate
sources of capital or liquidation of other assets, it is more likely than not
that the additional investment into CCTV will not be made, or will be made in
an amount that is materially lower than provided for in the acquisition
agreements. At September 30, 2003, CCTV had approximately $1,104,000 in cash and
current liabilities of approximately $3,942,000. However, CCTV is still generating cash flow losses and it has
plans to expand its access network by an additional approximately 50,000 homes,
which will require capital expenditures estimated to be in excess of
$2,000,000. Accordingly, CCTV will
remain dependent upon outside sources of cash, including the planned capital
contributions to be made by the Company.
The Company's ability to make such contributions cannot be guaranteed.
In addition, the adequacy of any such additional cash contribution into CCTV,
to meet CCTV's planned cash flow obligations cannot be assured. Accordingly, in the absence of new sources of capital, CCTV may have to
reduce portions of its planned expansion of its access network, or could fail
to meet its obligations which could result in the loss of value of the
Company's current and planned investment in CCTV.
14
The following table presents the Company's contractual obligations as
of November 30, 2003. These obligations exclude requirements to provide funding
to CCTV which the Company will be contractually obligated to make once it has
consummated the acquisition of CCTV: Payments Due By Period Less Than Long term debt $ 3,581 $ 598 $
1,719 $ 333 $ 931 Operating leases 155 76 70 9 - $ 3,736 $ 674 $ 1,789 $ 342 $ 931 Effect
of New Accounting Pronouncements In January 2003, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board ("FASB") issued Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation
of Variable Interest Entities (VIE), an interpretation of ARB No. 51, which
requires all VIEs to be consolidated by the primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary is the entity that
holds the majority of the beneficial interests in the VIE. In addition, the interpretation expands
disclosure requirements for both VIEs that are consolidated as well as VIEs
from which the entity is the holder of a significant amount of the beneficial
interests, but not the majority. The
disclosure requirements of this interpretation are effective for all financial
statements issued after January 31, 2003.
The consolidation requirements of this interpretation have recently been
deferred and are now effective for all periods ending no later than March 15,
2004. Because the Company believes it
has no variable interest entities, it does not expect that the adoption of this
new standard will have an effect on the consolidated financial position or
results of operations. In April 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 149 ("SFAS 149"), "Amendment of Statement 133 on
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." SFAS 149 amends Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
133 to provide clarification on the financial accounting and reporting of
derivative instruments and hedging activities and requires that contracts with
similar characteristics be accounted for on a comparable basis. The provisions of SFAS 149 are effective for
contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003, and for hedging
relationships designated after June 30, 2003.
The Company is currently evaluating the effects this statement may have
on its consolidated financial statements. In May 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 150 ("SFAS 150"), "Accounting for Certain
Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and
Equity." SFAS 150 establishes
standards on the classification and measurement of certain financial instruments
with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. The provisions of SFAS 150 are effective for financial
instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and to all other
instruments that exist as of the beginning of the first interim financial
reporting period beginning after June 15, 2003 (our third quarter of fiscal
2004). The Company is currently
evaluating the effects this statement may have on its consolidated financial
statements. OFF BALANCE SHEET
ARRANGEMENTS The Company has a contingent liability with respect to
a $386,000 letter of credit issued by its bank to secure performance bonds
issued in connection with an unresolved state income tax matter.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk EQUITY SECURITY RISK 15
revenue
200
125
628
378
subsidiary
(167)
(44)
(251)
(44)
Income tax (benefit) expense has been accrued based upon
estimated effective tax rates for the fiscal year, after considering valuation
allowances related to the Company's ability to realize a tax benefit from its
equity in the losses of Moscow Broadband.
Income from Discontinued Operations
During the nine month period ended November 30, 2002, the Company owned JM
Ney for only 22 days until its sale effective March 22, 2002. JM Ney's results for that period produced net
income of $132,000 after income taxes.
The sale of JM Ney's net assets in March 2002 produced a gain
of $1,472,000 after a provision for income taxes of $686,000. The components of the selling price resulted
in proceeds which were higher than book value for inventory and fixed assets,
which were partially offset by expenses of the transaction.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Contractual Obligation
Total
One Year
1-3 Years
4-5 Years
After 5 Years
The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in equity security prices,
interest rates and from factors that impact equity investments in Russia, as
discussed in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
February 28, 2003. The following
information is presented to update the status of the identified risks.
At November 30, 2003, the Company has equity risk with respect to
$3,836,000 of investments in publicly traded financial institutions, and it
also has an equity investment in a Ukraine based utility company with a
reported value of $5,000.
At November 30, 2003, the Company had investments in CCTV and Moscow Broadband with a combined carrying value of $4,983,000, or 26.9% of total consolidated assets. Moscow Broadband's primary asset is an investment in CCTV, a Moscow, Russia based broadband cable operator licensed to provide video, Internet and telephony to up to 1.5 million homes and businesses in Moscow. Accordingly, these investments bear the specific economic, currency and political risks of this region.
In May 2003, the Company entered into agreements which, when consummated, will result in CCTV being wholly-owned by the Company. The consummation of these transactions will increase the concentration of both foreign investment risk and the capital risk associated with a start-up company which is experiencing operating losses and requires the commitment of funds to meet the capital expenditure needs of its business plan. Such transactions are also expected to significantly reduce the Company's liquidity as discussed in the Liquidity and Capital Resource section of Item 2 of this report.
INTEREST RATE RISK
At November 30, 2003, Andersen Land Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company, was obligated under a mortgage note which bears interest at 2.25%
above the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), which will expose it to
interest rate risk at each periodic renewal of the rate, the first of which
will be in March 2004. If the interest
rate on the mortgage note increases from the current annual rate of 3.284% by
1% at renewal, the Company estimates that the interest cost of this obligation
would increase by approximately $17,000 for the fiscal year ending February 28,
2005.
Item
4. Controls and Procedures
As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), within the 90 days prior to
the filing date of this report, the Company carried out an evaluation of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls
and procedures. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with
the participation of the Company's management, including the Company's
President and Chief Executive Officer along with the Company's Chief Financial
Officer. Based upon that evaluation, the Company's President and Chief
Executive Officer along with the Company's Chief Financial Officer concluded
that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There have
been no significant changes in the Company's internal controls, or in other
factors, which could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the
date the Company carried out its evaluation.
The Company records in its financial statements its 25% equity interest in MBC, whose main business is its 50% equity interest in CCTV, and also a $3,500,000 direct investment in CCTV. The transactions with COMCOR and the shareholders of MBC described in Note (4) to the consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of this Report will result in the Company acquiring 100% of the equity interest of CCTV. Until the transactions are consummated, the Company does not control CCTV. Therefore, at the present time, the Company is not in a position to assure that CCTV has effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. Management of the Company is currently working with management of CCTV to implement effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting at CCTV after the consummation of the transactions. Management has disclosed to the Company's auditors and audit committee the status of its efforts to implement effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting at CCTV.
Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in Company reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in Company reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
16
Morton International, Inc. v. A.E. Staley Mfg. Co. et al. and Velsicol Chemical Corp. v. A.E. Staley Mfg. Co. et al.
As originally reported in the Company's Form 10-K for
the year ended February 28, 1997, in July 1996, two companion lawsuits were
filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, by
various owners and operators of the Ventron-Velsicol Superfund Site
("Site"). The lawsuits, which
were subsequently consolidated, were filed under the Comprehensive
Environmental Resource Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA"), the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the New Jersey Spill Act and New Jersey
common law, alleging that the defendants (over 100 companies, including JM Ney)
were generators of certain wastes allegedly processed at the Site. The lawsuits seek recovery of costs incurred
and a declaration of future liability for costs to be incurred by the owners
and operators in studying and remediating the Site.
As further reported in the Company's Form 10-Q for the period ended November
30, 2001, this case was dismissed without prejudice and the plaintiffs' ability
to reinstate their claims were limited for a minimum of three years until
October 2004. If the plaintiffs reinstate
the case, given the legal and factual issues that remain outstanding, the
Company currently has no basis to ascertain the range of loss, should any
occur, with respect to an outcome that may be considered unfavorable. This contingent liability was not assumed by
the buyer of JM Ney's net assets.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
During the three-months ended November 30, 2003, the Company held a Special Meeting of its stockholders at which the following proposals were voted on and approved by the stockholders:
FOR |
AGAINST |
ABSTAIN |
|
1. Approval of the issuance of common stock pursuant to the CCTV share acquisition. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Approval of the issuance of common stock pursuant to the MBC share acquisition. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Approval of an amendment to the certificate of incorporation increasing the number of authorized shares. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Approval of an amendment to the certificate of incorporation adopting cumulative voting the election of directors. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Approval of an amendment to the certificate of incorporation adopting a change in the name of the company to Moscow CableCom Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Approval of the adoption of the Andersen Group, Inc. 2003 Stock Plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Approval of the adoption of the Andersen Group, Inc. 2003 Stock Option Plan. |
|
|
|
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K: |
Exhibit Description |
Exhibit 31.1 Certification
of CEO pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act |
(a) Reports on Form 8-K: During the three months ended November 30, 2003, the Company filed the following reports on Form 8-K:
17
On October 16, 2003, the Company filed a Form 8-K under Items 7 and 12 to report its results of operations for the three and six months ended August 31, 2003.
On October 27, 2003, the Company filed a Form 8-K under Items 7 and 9 pursuant to Regulation FD to report certain information which was being presented at the Special Meeting of Stockholders being held on that date.
On October 28, 2003, the Company filed a Form 8-K under Items 5 and 7 to report that it had issued a press release announcing the approval by Stockholders of the issuance of Common Stock to Moscow Telecommunication Corporation (COMCOR) and the stockholders of Moscow Broadband Communications Ltd (MBC) which will, when consummated, result in the acquisition of 100% of ZAO ComCor-TV (CCTV), an operator of a growing cable television and Internet access network in Moscow, Russia. The press release also announced the approval of the change of the Company's name to Moscow CableCom Corp., which is expected to be put into effect following the closing of the acquisition of CCTV.
Subsequent to November 30, 2003, the Company filed the following report on Form 8-K:
On December 18, 2003, the Company filed a Form 8-K under Items 5 and 7 to report that it had issued a press release announcing that its planned acquisition of CCTV had been approved by the Ministry of the Russian Federation on Anti-Monopoly Policy, and that the Company expected to be able to close on the proposed acquisition by mid-January 2004.
18
Pursuant to the
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
ANDERSEN GROUP, INC. |
By: /s/
Oliver R. Grace, Jr. |
Date: January 14, 2003 |
By: /s/ Andrew M. O'Shea |
Date: January 14, 2003 |
19