UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001
Commission file number 0-565
ALEXANDER & BALDWIN, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Hawaii 99-0032630
(State or other
jurisdiction (I.R.S.
of incorporation or Employer Identification
organization) No.)
822 Bishop Street
Post Office Box 3440, Honolulu, Hawaii 96801
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)
808-525-6611
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, without par value
(Title of Class)
Number of shares of Common Stock outstanding at February 14, 2002:
40,606,808
Aggregate market value of Common Stock held by non-affiliates at February 14,
2002:
$937,859,339
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No
--- ---
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to
the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]
Documents Incorporated By Reference
Portions of Registrant's Proxy Statement dated March 11, 2002 (Part III of Form
10-K).
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
Page
----
Items 1. & 2. Business and Properties........................................................ 1
A. Ocean Transportation........................................................... 1
(1) Freight Services.......................................................... 1
(2) Vessels................................................................... 2
(3) Terminals................................................................. 2
(4) Other Services............................................................ 4
(5) Competition............................................................... 4
(6) Labor Relations........................................................... 5
(7) Rate Regulation........................................................... 5
B. Property Development and Management............................................ 5
(1) General................................................................... 5
(2) Planning and Zoning....................................................... 6
(3) Residential Projects...................................................... 6
(4) Commercial and Industrial Properties...................................... 8
C. Food Products.................................................................. 11
(1) Production................................................................ 11
(2) Marketing of Sugar and Coffee............................................. 12
(3) Competition and Sugar Legislation......................................... 12
(4) Properties and Water...................................................... 13
D. Employees and Labor Relations.................................................. 14
E. Energy......................................................................... 15
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.................................................................... 15
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.................................. 16
Executive Officers of the Registrant............................................................ 16
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters................ 16
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.............................................................. 18
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 19
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk........................... 25
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.......................................... 26
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure. 57
i
PART III
Page
----
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.............. 58
A. Directors....................................................... 58
B. Executive Officers of the Registrant............................ 58
Item 11. Executive Compensation.......................................... 59
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.. 59
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.................. 59
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K 60
A. Financial Statements............................................ 60
B. Financial Statement Schedules................................... 60
C. Exhibits Required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K................. 60
D. Reports on Form 8-K............................................. 65
Signatures................................................................. 66
Independent Auditors' Consent.............................................. 68
ii
ALEXANDER & BALDWIN, INC.
FORM 10-K
Annual Report for the Fiscal Year
Ended December 31, 2001
PART I
ITEMS 1 AND 2. BUSINESS AND PROPERTIES
Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. ("A&B") is a diversified corporation with most of
its operations centered in Hawaii. It was founded in 1870 and incorporated in
1900. Ocean transportation operations and related shoreside operations of A&B
are conducted by a wholly-owned subsidiary, Matson Navigation Company, Inc.
("Matson"), and several Matson subsidiaries. Real property and food products
operations are conducted by A&B and certain other wholly-owned subsidiaries of
A&B.
The industry segments of A&B are as follows:
A. Ocean Transportation--carrying freight, primarily between various ports
on the United States Pacific Coast and major Hawaii ports and Guam;
chartering vessels to third parties; providing terminal, stevedoring and
container equipment maintenance services in Hawaii; arranging intermodal
transportation in North America; and providing supply and distribution
services.
B. Property Development and Management--purchasing, developing, selling,
managing and leasing retail, office, industrial, commercial and
residential properties, in Hawaii and on the U.S. Mainland.
C. Food Products--growing sugar cane and coffee in Hawaii; producing bulk
raw sugar, specialty food-grade sugars, molasses and green coffee;
marketing and distributing roasted coffee and green coffee; providing
sugar and molasses hauling and storage, general freight and petroleum
hauling in Hawaii; and generating and selling electricity.
For information about the revenue, operating profits and identifiable assets
of A&B's industry segments for the three years ended December 31, 2001, see
Note 14 ("Industry Segments") to A&B's financial statements in Item 8 below.
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND PROPERTIES
A. Ocean Transportation
(1) Freight Services
Matson's Hawaii Service offers containership freight services between the
ports of Los Angeles, Oakland, Seattle, and the major ports in Hawaii, which
are located on the islands of Oahu, Kauai, Maui and Hawaii. Roll-on/roll-off
service is provided between California and the major ports in Hawaii. Container
cargo also is received at and delivered to Portland, Oregon, and moved overland
between Portland and Seattle at no extra charge.
Matson is the principal carrier of ocean cargo between the United States
Pacific Coast and Hawaii. In 2001, Matson carried 149,636 containers (compared
with 151,496 in 2000) and 122,389 motor vehicles (compared with 132,186 in
2000) between those destinations. In response to a weakening Hawaii economy and
declining demand, Matson reduced its Hawaii Service fleet from eight vessels to
seven vessels in January 2002. Principal westbound cargoes carried by Matson to
Hawaii include refrigerated commodities, dry containers of mixed commodities,
1
packaged foods, motor vehicles, and building materials. Principal eastbound
cargoes carried by Matson from Hawaii include motor vehicles, household goods,
canned pineapple, refrigerated containers of fresh pineapple, and dry
containers of mixed commodities. The preponderance of Matson's Hawaii Service
revenue is derived from the westbound carriage of containerized freight and
motor vehicles.
Matson's Guam Service provides containership freight service between the
United States Pacific Coast and Guam and Micronesia. Matson's Guam Service is a
component of the Pacific Alliance Service, a strategic alliance established in
1996 by Matson and American President Lines, Ltd. ("APL") to provide freight
service between the United States Pacific Coast and Hawaii, Guam, and several
Far East ports. In 2001, Matson carried 17,225 containers (compared with 18,165
in 2000) and 2,750 automobiles (compared with 2,616 in 2000) in the Guam
Service. The alliance currently utilizes five vessels (three Matson vessels and
two APL vessels) in a schedule which provides service from the United States
Pacific Coast to Guam and Micronesia, continuing through Far East ports, and
returning to California.
Matson's Mid-Pacific Service offers container and conventional freight
service between the United States Pacific Coast and the ports of Kwajalein,
Ebeye and Majuro in the Republic of the Marshall Islands and Johnston Island,
all via Honolulu.
See "Rate Regulation" below with respect to Matson's freight rates.
(2) Vessels
Matson's cargo fleet consists of eleven containerships, two combination
container/trailerships, one roll-on/roll-off barge, two container barges
equipped with cranes which serve the neighbor islands of Hawaii and one
container barge equipped with cranes in the Mid-Pacific Service. These
seventeen vessels represent an investment of approximately $694,618,000
expended over the past 31 years. The majority of vessels in the Matson cargo
fleet have been acquired with the assistance of withdrawals from a Capital
Construction Fund established under Section 607 of the Merchant Marine Act,
1936, as amended. Matson's fleet is aging and includes six vessels that will be
between 29 and 32 years old in 2002. During 2001, Matson actively began
pursuing vessel replacement alternatives.
Currently, three containerships are time-chartered to APL in connection with
the Pacific Alliance Service. Two container/trailerships previously
bareboat-chartered to Sea Star Line, LLC, which operates the vessels in the
Florida-Puerto Rico trade, and in which Matson has a minority investment
interest, were sold to Sea Star Line, LLC in January 2002.
Matson's fleet units are described on the list on the following page.
As a complement to its fleet, Matson owns approximately 15,000 containers,
10,670 container chassis, 730 auto-frames and miscellaneous other equipment.
Capital expenditures by Matson in 2001 for vessels, equipment and systems
totaled approximately $28,000,000.
(3) Terminals
Matson Terminals, Inc. ("Matson Terminals"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Matson, provides container stevedoring, container equipment maintenance and
other terminal services for Matson and other ocean carriers at its 108-acre
marine terminal in Honolulu. Matson Terminals owns and operates seven cranes at
the terminal, which handled 383,506 containers in 2001 (compared with 402,500
in 2000) and can accommodate three vessels at one time. In 2001, Matson
Terminals substantially completed a $32 million terminal improvement project at
the Honolulu terminal, which included the conversion from a straddle
carrier-based container handling system to a wheeled chassis-based system. The
conversion is expected to increase terminal storage density, improve
productivity, and reduce costs. Matson Terminals' lease with the State of
Hawaii runs through September 2016.
2
MATSON NAVIGATION COMPANY, INC.
FLEET--2/1/02
Usable Cargo Capacity
--------------------------------------------
Containers Vehicles
Year Maximum Maximum ----------------------------- --------------
Official Year Recon- Speed Deadweight Reefer
Vessel Name Number Built structed Length (Knots) (Long Tons) 20' 24' 40' Slots TEUs (1) Autos Trailers
- ----------- -------- ----- -------- ---------- ------- ----------- --- --- ----- ------ -------- ----- --------
Diesel-Powered Ships
- --------------------
R.J. PFEIFFER....... 979814 1992 713'6" 23.0 27,100 48 171 988 300 2,229 -- --
MOKIHANA (2)........ 655397 1983 860'2" 23.0 30,167 182 0 1,340 408 2,824 -- --
MAHIMAHI (2)........ 653424 1982 860'2" 23.0 30,167 182 0 1,340 408 2,824 -- --
MANOA (2)........... 651627 1982 860'2" 23.0 30,187 182 0 1,340 408 2,824 -- --
Steam-Powered Ships
- -------------------
KAUAI............... 621042 1980 1994 720'5 1/2" 22.5 26,308 -- 458 538 300 1,626 44 --
MAUI................ 591709 1978 1993 720'5 1/2" 22.5 26,623 -- 458 538 300 1,626 -- --
MATSONIA............ 553090 1973 1987 760'0" 21.5 22,501 16 128 771 201 1,712 450 56
LURLINE............. 549900 1973 1982 826'6" 21.5 22,213 6 162 713 292 1,379 220 81
EWA (3)............. 530140 1972 1978 787'8" 21.0 38,747 286 276 681 228 1,979 -- --
CHIEF GADAO......... 530138 1971 1978 787'8" 21.0 37,346 230 464 597 274 1,981 -- --
LIHUE............... 530137 1971 1978 787'8" 21.0 38,656 286 276 681 188 1,979 -- --
MANULANI............ 528400 1970 720'5 1/2" 22.5 27,109 26 160 659 221 1,536 -- --
MANUKAI (3)......... 524219 1970 720'5 1/2" 22.5 27,107 -- 537 416 251 1,476 -- --
Tugs and Barges
- ---------------
WAIALEALE (4)....... 978516 1991 345'0" -- 5,621 -- -- -- 35 -- 230 45
ISLANDER (5)........ 933804 1988 372'0" -- 6,837 -- 276 24 70 380 -- --
MAUNA LOA (5)....... 676973 1984 350'0" -- 4,658 -- 144 72 84 316 -- --
HALEAKALA (5)....... 676972 1984 350'0" -- 4,658 -- 144 72 84 316 -- --
Molasses
----------
Vessel Name Short Tons
- ----------- ----------
Diesel-Powered Ships
- --------------------
R.J. PFEIFFER....... --
MOKIHANA (2)........ --
MAHIMAHI (2)........ --
MANOA (2)........... --
Steam-Powered Ships
- -------------------
KAUAI............... 2,600
MAUI................ 2,600
MATSONIA............ 4,300
LURLINE............. 2,100
EWA (3)............. --
CHIEF GADAO......... --
LIHUE............... --
MANULANI............ 5,300
MANUKAI (3)......... 5,300
Tugs and Barges
- ---------------
WAIALEALE (4)....... --
ISLANDER (5)........ --
MAUNA LOA (5)....... 2,100
HALEAKALA (5)....... 2,100
- --------
(1) "Twenty-foot Equivalent Units" (including trailers). TEU is a standard
measure of cargo volume correlated to the volume of a standard 20-foot dry
cargo container.
(2) Time-chartered to APL until February 2006.
(3) Reserve Status
(4) Roll-on/Roll-off Barge
(5) Container Barge
3
SSA Terminals, LLC, a joint venture formed by Matson and Stevedoring
Services of America in July 1999, provides terminal and stevedoring services at
West Coast terminal facilities in Los Angeles, Long Beach, Oakland and Seattle.
Capital expenditures incurred by Matson Terminals for terminals and
equipment totaled approximately $31,100,000 in 2001.
(4) Other Services
Matson Intermodal System, Inc. ("Matson Intermodal") is an intermodal
marketing company which arranges North American rail and truck transportation
for shippers and carriers, frequently in conjunction with ocean transportation.
Through volume purchases of rail and motor carrier transportation services,
augmented by such services as shipment tracing and single-vendor invoicing,
Matson Intermodal is able to reduce transportation costs for customers. Matson
Intermodal currently has 40 offices and manages 30 equipment depots across the
United States Mainland.
In July 2001, Matson Services Company, Inc. ("Matson Services"), a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Matson, sold the two tugboats which it had employed
in Hawaiian waters to provide harbor assistance to vessels calling at the
islands of Hawaii and Maui. Matson Services was dissolved effective December
31, 2001.
Matson Logistics Solutions, Inc. ("Matson Logistics"), a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Matson, provides supply chain, transportation management, and
project cargo management services to Matson customers and others. In 2001,
Matson Logistics entered the air freight business by entering into an alliance
with an existing international air freight forwarder.
(5) Competition
Matson's Hawaii and Guam Services have one major containership competitor,
which serves Long Beach, Oakland, Tacoma, Honolulu and Guam.
Other competitors in the Hawaii Service include two common carrier barge
services, unregulated proprietary and contract carriers of bulk cargoes, and
air cargo services. Although air freight competition is intense for
time-sensitive or perishable cargoes, historic and projected inroads of such
competition in cargo volume are limited by the amount of cargo space available
in passenger aircraft and by generally higher air freight rates.
Matson vessels are operated on schedules which make available to shippers
and consignees regular day-of-the-week sailings from the United States Pacific
Coast and day-of-the-week arrivals in Hawaii. Under its current schedule,
Matson operates 182 Hawaii round-trip voyages per year, 75 percent more than
its closest competitor, and arranges additional voyages when cargo volumes
require additional capacity. This service is attractive to customers because
more frequent arrivals permit customers to lower inventory costs. In addition,
Matson competes by offering more comprehensive service to customers, supported
by its scope of equipment and its efficiency and experience in the handling of
containerized cargoes, and by competitive pricing.
The carriage of cargo between the United States Pacific Coast and Hawaii on
foreign-built or foreign-documented vessels is prohibited by Section 27 of the
Merchant Marine Act, 1920, frequently referred to as the Jones Act. However,
foreign-flag vessels carrying cargo to Hawaii from foreign sources provide
indirect competition for Matson's container freight service between the United
States Pacific Coast and Hawaii. Far East countries, Australia, New Zealand and
South Pacific islands have direct foreign-flag services to Hawaii.
In response to coordinated efforts by various interests to convince Congress
to repeal the Jones Act, Matson joined other businesses and organizations in
1995 to form the Maritime Cabotage Task Force, which supports the
4
retention of the Jones Act and other cabotage laws. Repeal of the Jones Act
would allow all foreign-flag vessel operators, which do not have to abide by
U.S. laws and regulations, to sail between American ports, in direct
competition with Matson and other U.S. operators which must comply with such
laws and regulations. The Task Force seeks to inform elected officials and the
public about the economic, national security, commercial, safety and
environmental benefits of the Jones Act and similar cabotage laws.
Matson Intermodal competes for freight with a number of large and small
companies engaged in intermodal transportation. Matson Logistics competes with
many larger providers of logistics services and with transportation companies
whose services include logistics.
(6) Labor Relations
The absence of strikes and the availability of labor through hiring halls
are important to the maintenance of profitable operations by Matson. Matson's
operations have not been disrupted significantly by strikes in the past 30
years. See "Employees and Labor Relations" below for a description of labor
agreements and certain unfunded liabilities for multi-employer pension plans to
which Matson and Matson Terminals contribute.
(7) Rate Regulation
Matson is subject to the jurisdiction of the Surface Transportation Board
with respect to its domestic rates. A rate in the noncontiguous domestic trade
is presumed reasonable and will not be subject to investigation if the
aggregate of increases and decreases is not more than 7.5 percent above, or
more than 10 percent below, the rate in effect one year before the effective
date of the proposed rate, subject to increase or decrease by the percentage
change in the U.S. Producer Price Index. Matson filed a 3.5 percent
across-the-board increase in its Hawaii Service shipping rates, which became
effective on February 14, 2001. Also in 2001, Matson reduced its fuel surcharge
in its Hawaii and Guam Services by one percentage point, from 4.25 percent to
3.25 percent, effective November 25, 2001.
B. Property Development and Management
(1) General
A&B and its subsidiaries own approximately 90,900 acres of land, consisting
of approximately 90,600 acres in Hawaii and approximately 300 acres elsewhere,
as follows:
Location No. of Acres
-------- ------------
Oahu...... 36
Maui...... 68,709
Kauai..... 21,892
California 122
Texas..... 65
Washington 13
Arizona... 35
Nevada.... 19
Colorado.. 10
------
TOTAL.. 90,901
======
As described more fully in the table below, the bulk of this acreage currently
is used for agricultural and related activities, and includes pasture land,
watershed land, and conservation reserves. The balance is used or planned for
development or other urban uses. An additional 3,270 acres on Maui and Kauai
are leased from third parties.
5
No. of
Current Use Acres
----------- ------
Hawaii
------
Fully-entitled urban (defined below)... 1,246
Agricultural, pasture and miscellaneous 60,100
Watershed land/conservation............ 29,291
U.S. Mainland
-------------
Fully-entitled urban................... 254
Agriculture, pasture and miscellaneous. 10
------
TOTAL............................... 90,901
======
A&B and its subsidiaries are actively involved in the entire spectrum of
land development, including planning, zoning, financing, constructing,
purchasing, managing and leasing, and selling and exchanging real property.
(2) Planning and Zoning
The entitlement process for development of property in Hawaii is both
time-consuming and costly, involving numerous State and County regulatory
approvals. For example, conversion of an agriculturally-zoned parcel to
residential zoning usually requires the following approvals:
. amendment of the County general plan to reflect the desired residential
use;
. approval by the State Land Use Commission to reclassify the parcel from
the "Agricultural" district to the "Urban" district;
. County approval to rezone the property to the precise residential use
desired; and,
. if the parcel is located in the Special Management Area, the granting of
a Special Management Area permit by the County.
The entitlement process is complicated by the conditions, restrictions and
exactions that are placed on these approvals, including, among others, the
construction of infrastructure improvements, payment of impact fees,
restrictions on the permitted uses of the land, provision of affordable
housing, and/or mandatory fee sale of portions of the project.
A&B actively works with regulatory agencies, commissions and legislative
bodies at various levels of government to obtain zoning reclassification of
land to its highest and best use. A&B designates a parcel as "fully-entitled"
or "fully-zoned" when all necessary government land use approvals have been
obtained.
As described in more detail below, in 2001, work to obtain entitlements for
urban use focused on (i) obtaining Community Plan designations for various A&B
lands on Maui, and (ii) obtaining County entitlements for a proposed
single-family subdivision and proposed hotel on Maui. The Community Plans serve
to guide planning and development activity on Maui. A&B has obtained and
continues to seek various urban designations for its undeveloped lands within
the four Community Plans where most of its Maui lands are located.
(3) Residential Projects
A&B is pursuing a number of residential projects in Hawaii, including:
(a) Kukui'Ula. Kukui'Ula is a 1,045-acre master planned resort residential
community located in Poipu, Kauai. Approximately 837 acres are fully entitled
for up to 900 hotel and vacation ownership (timeshare) units, 3,000 residential
units, a golf course, and commercial uses. The balance of the project is
partially entitled and planned for
6
up to 750 residential units. During 2001, the Company engaged in a number of
development activities intended to position the project for development and for
securing joint venture partners, including the following:
. Civil engineering design commenced on Koloa Plantations, Kukui'Ula's
second residential project. Approximately 95 one-half acre lots are
planned.
. The project's water master plan was updated, and two potential water
sources were identified to supply potable water for the initial phase of
development. Agreements defining the Company's participation in these
water projects are undergoing final review by the Department of Water of
the County of Kauai.
. Preliminary civil engineering design of backbone infrastructure
commenced for the major project roadway.
. The initial phase of beach improvements was implemented, and
archaeological mitigation and preservation plans were prepared for
inventoried archaeological sites.
In September 2001, a non-binding letter of intent was entered into with a
Mainland-based developer of master-planned communities, for the joint venture
development of Kukui'Ula. Based on due diligence activities completed to date,
a joint venture agreement could be finalized in the first quarter of 2002.
Sales at Koloa Estates, Kukui'Ula's first for-sale residential project,
neared completion in 2001. Lot sales at this 32-lot subdivision commenced in
September 1999. As of January 31, 2002, 28 lots have been sold, with three lots
in escrow and one lot reserved. The average sales price of the 31 lots sold or
in escrow was $149,200.
(b) The Vintage at Kaanapali. Located on 17 acres in the Kaanapali Golf
Estates project in Kaanapali, Maui, and surrounded by the Kaanapali South Golf
Course, this project was developed as 73 detached single-family homes under a
condominium regime. Home construction began in February 2000 and was completed
in June 2001. All 73 homes were sold by July 2001. The units were sold at an
average price of $590,000.
(c) The Summit at Kaanapali. In January 2000, the Company acquired an
additional 17 acres in the Kaanapali Golf Estates project. This land is being
developed into 55 single-family homes or house lots. Site work construction was
completed in May 2001 and construction of the 17 homes in Phase I commenced in
June 2001. Five units were completed and closed as of December 31, 2001, at an
average price of $1.1 million. As of January 31, 2002, an additional eight
units were in escrow.
(d) HoloHolo Ku. In October 2001, the Company entered into a joint venture
with Kamuela Associates LLC for the development of 44 detached single-family
homes under a condominium regime, on an 8.5-acre parcel in Kamuela on the
island of Hawaii. An additional 7.2-acre estate lot is available for sale.
Construction commenced early November 2001 and sales are projected to begin
closing in the fourth quarter of 2002. As of January 31, 2002, there were 28
binding sales contracts in escrow.
(e) Kai Lani. In September 2001, the Company entered into a joint venture
agreement with Armstrong Kai Lani Corporation for the development of 116
townhouse units on an 11-acre parcel in the Ko Olina Resort on Oahu.
Construction commenced February 2002.
(f) Waikiki Project. On November 1, 2001, the Company acquired a 1.63-acre
vacant, fee simple development site in Waikiki, Oahu, for approximately $3.6
million. The property, located at the entrance to Waikiki, is zoned for
high-rise residential use and limited commercial uses. Planning and design work
for a high-rise condominium development is expected to take place in 2002.
(g) Other Maui Subdivisions. The Company continues to seek entitlements for
two other single-family subdivisions on Maui: (i) an approximately 200-unit
subdivision on 67 acres in Haliimaile (Upcountry, Maui), and (ii) an
approximately 400-unit subdivision on 210 acres in Spreckelsville, which
includes the possible expansion of the nearby nine-hole Maui Country Club golf
course into an 18-hole course. A final decision by the Maui County Council on
the Company's zoning application for the Haliimaile project was anticipated in
2001. However, due to general water and traffic issues for the Upcountry
region, final Council action is not anticipated until the second half of 2002.
Approval of the Spreckelsville project was sought from the Maui County Council
as part of its ten-year update of the Wailuku-Kahului Community Plan. Primarily
in response to concerns raised over potential traffic impacts, the
7
Council Planning Committee, in September 2001, voted against including
Spreckelsville in the Community Plan. However, because of the project's
positive planning features, the Committee recommended that the Company file a
separate Community Plan application in order to have the project impacts
evaluated under an environmental impact assessment.
In May 2001, a Disposition Agreement was entered into for the bulk sale of
the 86.4-acre Maunaolu agricultural subdivision (minimum two-acre sized lots).
Closing could be accomplished in the first half of 2002.
(4) Commercial and Industrial Properties
An important source of property revenue is the lease rental income the
Company receives from nearly 5.4 million leasable square feet of industrial and
commercial building space, ground leases on 275 acres for commercial/industrial
use, and leases on 10,930 acres for agricultural/pasture use.
(a) Hawaii Commercial/Industrial Properties
In Hawaii, most of the approximately 1.5 million square feet of
income-producing commercial and industrial properties owned by the Company are
located in the central Kahului/Wailuku area of Maui and in central Oahu. They
consist primarily of three shopping centers and ten office buildings, as well
as twelve other improved commercial and industrial properties. The average
occupancy for the Hawaii improved commercial properties increased to 90% in
2001, from 86% in 2000. The improvement was due primarily to the high tenancies
in recently-acquired properties.
The Pacific Guardian Complex, consisting of an eighteen-story office
building and an adjacent two-story commercial complex, having a total leasable
area of 136,100 square feet, was acquired in February 2001. The property is
located in the Kapiolani business district on the island of Oahu. In June 2001,
the 124,600-square-foot Kaneohe Bay Shopping Center, located in the suburban
community of Kaneohe, Oahu, was added to the portfolio. Both properties were
98% occupied at the time of acquisition. These acquisitions were made through
tax-deferred exchanges under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code, as
amended ("Code").
8
The primary Hawaii commercial/industrial properties are as follows:
Leasable Area
Property Location Type (sq. ft.)
-------- ---------------- ---------------- -------------
Maui Mall.................. Kahului, Maui Retail 192,600
Pacific Guardian Complex... Honolulu, Oahu Office 136,100
Kaneohe Bay Shopping Center Kaneohe, Oahu Retail 124,600
P&L Warehouse.............. Kahului, Maui Warehouse 104,100
Kahului Shopping Center.... Kahului, Maui Retail 99,400
Ocean View Center.......... Honolulu, Oahu Office 99,200
Hawaii Business Park....... Pearl City, Oahu Warehouse 85,200
Haseko Center.............. Honolulu, Oahu Office 84,200
One Main Plaza............. Wailuku, Maui Office 81,600
Wakea Business Center...... Kahului, Maui Warehouse/Retail 61,500
Kahului Office Building.... Kahului, Maui Office 55,400
Fairway Shops at Kaanapali. Kaanapali, Maui Retail 35,000
Kahului Office Center...... Kahului, Maui Office 31,000
Apex Building.............. Kahului, Maui Retail 28,100
Stangenwald Building....... Honolulu, Oahu Office 27,100
Judd Building.............. Honolulu, Oahu Office 20,200
A number of other commercial and industrial projects are being developed on
Maui, Oahu and Kauai, including:
(i) Triangle Square. Construction of Kele Center, a 15,000-square-foot
commercial building at Triangle Square, near the Kahului Airport on Maui, was
completed in June 2001. A 4,500-square-foot national franchise restaurant
opened in October 2001, and a 1,200-square-foot national haircare salon is
scheduled to open in early 2002. Construction of a 6,200-square-foot automobile
dealership was completed in October 2001, and the dealership opened for
business that same month. Ground leases and build-to-suit opportunities are
being pursued for the remaining 4.5 acres at Triangle Square.
(ii) Maui Business Park. Located in Kahului, Maui, the initial phase of
Maui Business Park consists of Phase IA (37.4 saleable acres), completed in
1995, and Phase IB (32.0 saleable acres), completed in 2000.
Phase IA includes the 349,305-square-foot Maui Marketplace retail center,
which is owned by a third party and occupies 20.3 acres of the subdivision.
Maui Marketplace includes national tenants such as Lowe's Home Improvement
Warehouse, Office Max, Sports Authority, Old Navy, Border's Books and Music,
and Pier 1. The remaining area of Phase IA consists of 30 lots with an average
size of 22,900 square feet, of which one lot was sold and one lot was leased in
2001. Thirteen lots (7.3 saleable acres) remain available for sale or lease.
In Phase IB, Home Depot completed construction of a 135,000-square-foot
store in May 2001. In February 2001, Wal-Mart purchased a 14.0-acre parcel in
the subdivision and completed construction of a 142,000-square-foot store in
October 2001. The remaining area consists of 10 lots with an average size of
18,800 square feet, of which one lot was sold and one lot was leased in 2001.
Eight lots (3.7 saleable acres) remain available for sale or lease.
As part of the County of Maui's ten-year update of the Wailuku-Kahului
Community Plan, referred to above,
the Company is seeking the approval of approximately 175 acres for future
expansion of Maui Business Park. Based on concerns raised by Maui County
Council members over, among other things, whether the expansion areas were too
close to Kahului Airport, the Council Planning Committee voted against
recommending approval of the expansion areas. Following the Company's efforts
to address these concerns, on January 11, 2002, the County Council voted to
send the expansion proposal back to the Planning Committee for reconsideration.
(iii) Kahului Airport Hotel. In January 2001, land use applications were
filed with the County of Maui for the development of a 140-room,
moderately-priced hotel on 3.4 acres, at the entrance to Kahului Airport. The
hotel, to be operated under the Courtyard by Marriott brand, requires Community
Plan, zoning and special management area approvals before development can
proceed. A required environmental assessment for the project was completed in
July 2001. In September 2001, the Maui Planning Commission recommended approval
of the land use applications to
9
the Maui County Council, and in January 2002, the Council's Land Use Committee
recommended approval of the land use applications to the Council. Final Council
action is anticipated in the second quarter of 2002.
(iv) Fairway Shops at Kaanapali. Construction of this 35,500-square-foot
resort retail center in Kaanapali, Maui commenced in July 2001 and was
completed in December 2001. The center is located on a 3.2-acre site along
Honoapiilani Highway, the main corridor between Lahaina and Kapalua. Leasing
activities have commenced, but have been adversely affected by the September 11
impacts on tourism.
(v) Port Allen Marina Center. Pursuant to a long-term master plan for the
development of 80 acres at Port Allen, Kauai, construction began in October
2001 on a 26,000-square-foot retail center located on 1.7 acres. Construction
is expected to be complete by the third quarter of 2002.
(vi) Mill Town Center. Located in Waipahu, Oahu (approximately 12 miles
from Honolulu), the Mill Town Center is a light-industrial subdivision
consisting of 27.5 saleable acres being developed in two phases. Phase IA
(10.2 saleable acres), completed in 1999, consists of 23 fee simple industrial
lots. Four lots were sold to commercial and industrial businesses in 2001 and
eight lots (3.2 saleable acres) remain available for sale or lease.
Construction of infrastructure improvements for Phase IB (17.3 saleable
acres) was delayed in 2001 due to the discovery of lead contamination in
approximately four acres of the subdivision. Infrastructure construction
commenced in August 2001 on the unaffected portion of the site. Remediation
activities on the affected portion commenced in December 2001 and are expected
to be completed in early 2002. Construction of the remaining infrastructure for
Phase IB is expected to be completed by mid-2002. Marketing activities
commenced in 2001. In November 2001, an affiliate of Japan-based Fuji Photo
Film Co., Ltd. purchased a 3.0-acre parcel in Phase IB and commenced
construction of a 54,000-square-foot office, film processing and warehouse
facility. The remaining portion of Phase IB consists of 31 lots (14.3 saleable
acres), with an average size of 20,100 square feet.
(b) U.S. Mainland Commercial/Industrial Properties
On the U.S. Mainland, the Company owns a portfolio of commercial and
industrial properties, acquired primarily by way of tax-deferred exchanges
under Code Section 1031, comprising a total of approximately 4.0 million square
feet of leasable area, as follows:
Leasable Area
Property Location Type (sq. ft.)
- -------- -------------------- ------------------------ -------------
Ontario Distribution Center.... Ontario, CA Warehouse 895,500
Great Southwest Industrial..... Dallas, TX Warehouse 842,900
Ontario-Pacific Business Centre Ontario, CA Warehouse 246,100
Valley Freeway Corporate Park.. Kent, WA Warehouse 229,100
Airport Square................. Reno, NV Retail 170,800
San Pedro Plaza................ San Antonio, TX Office 163,800
2868 Prospect Park............. Sacramento, CA Office 160,700
Day Creek Industrial........... Ontario, CA Warehouse 147,300
Arbor Park..................... San Antonio, TX Retail 139,500
Mesa South Center.............. Phoenix, AZ Retail 133,600
Moulton Plaza.................. Laguna Hills, CA Retail 133,600
San Jose Avenue Warehouse...... City of Industry, CA Warehouse 126,000
Southbank II................... Phoenix, AZ Office 120,800
Village at Indian Wells........ Indian Wells, CA Retail 104,600
2450 Venture Oaks.............. Sacramento, CA Office 99,000
Northwest Business Center...... San Antonio, TX Service Center/Warehouse 87,100
Carefree Court................. Carefree, AZ Retail 85,000
Wilshire Center................ Greeley, CO Retail 46,700
Market Square.................. Greeley, CO Retail 43,300
10
In January 2001, the Company sold its Bainbridge Property portfolio located
on Bainbridge Island, WA. This portfolio included two retail properties and an
office building, having a combined leasable area of 114,600 square feet. In
June 2001, the Company acquired the Carefree Court shopping center, located in
the resort community of Carefree, AZ, situated north of Scottsdale, AZ. This
property was acquired as part of a Code Section 1031 exchange. In February
2002, the Company sold the Great Southwest Industrial property, located in
Dallas, TX.
A&B's Mainland commercial properties achieved an average occupancy rate of
93%, as compared to the 2000 average of 96%. The decrease primarily resulted
from an increase in available space in the Great Southwest Industrial property.
C. Food Products
(1) Production
A&B has been engaged in activities relating to the production of cane sugar
and molasses in Hawaii since 1870, and production of coffee in Hawaii since
1987. A&B's current food products operations consist of a sugar plantation on
the island of Maui, operated by its Hawaiian Commercial & Sugar Company
("HC&S") division, and a coffee farm on the island of Kauai, operated by its
Kauai Coffee Company, Inc. ("Kauai Coffee") subsidiary.
HC&S is Hawaii's largest producer of raw sugar, having produced 191,512 tons
of raw sugar in 2001, or about 70% of the raw sugar produced in Hawaii,
compared with 210,269 tons of raw sugar in 2000. The decrease in production was
due primarily to an extended drought. Total Hawaii sugar production, in turn,
amounted to approximately four percent of total United States sugar production.
HC&S harvested 15,101 acres of sugar cane in 2001, compared with 17,266 acres
in 2000. The decrease in acres harvested was due primarily to a
later-than-expected factory startup in 2001 and unexpected factory problems and
weather delays toward the end of the 2001 harvesting season. Yields averaged
12.7 tons of sugar per acre in 2001, compared with 12.2 tons per acre in 2000.
The average cost per ton of sugar produced at HC&S was $371 in 2001, compared
with $331 in 2000. The increase in cost per ton was attributable to higher
operating costs and lower sugar production. As a by-product of sugar
production, HC&S also produced 71,207 tons of molasses in 2001, compared with
70,551 tons in 2000.
In 2001, 8,848 tons of the raw sugar produced by HC&S were produced as
specialty food-grade raw sugars and sold under HC&S's Maui Brand(R) trademark.
A $2.4 million expansion of the production facilities for these sugars was
completed in February 2001. Further expansion is planned for 2002.
During 2001, Kauai Coffee had approximately 3,400 acres of coffee trees
under cultivation. The harvest of the 2001 coffee crop yielded approximately
3.8 million pounds of green coffee, compared with 2.8 million pounds in 2000.
The increased production was due primarily to better weather conditions in 2001.
Due to weaknesses in the panelboard market, production problems and poor
operating results, a development panelboard plant ceased operations and was
abandoned. The plant, operated by Hawaiian DuraGreen, Inc., a wholly-owned
subsidiary of A&B, produced panelboard from bagasse, a by-product in the
production of sugar. A&B recorded operating losses and closure costs of
$2,964,000, and a $11,387,000 write-down of the production assets, as a result
of this action.
HC&S and McBryde Sugar Company, Limited ("McBryde"), the parent company of
Kauai Coffee, produce electricity for internal use and for sale to the local
electric utility companies. HC&S's power is produced by burning bagasse, by
hydroelectric power generation and, when necessary, by burning fossil fuels,
whereas McBryde produces power solely by hydroelectric generation. The price
for the power sold by HC&S and McBryde is equal to the utility companies'
"avoided cost" of not producing such power themselves. In addition, HC&S
receives a capacity payment to provide a guaranteed power generation capacity
to the local utility. (See "Energy" below.)
Kahului Trucking & Storage, Inc., a subsidiary of A&B, provides sugar and
molasses hauling and storage, petroleum hauling, mobile equipment maintenance
and repair services, and self-service storage facilities on Maui.
11
Kauai Commercial Company, Incorporated, another subsidiary of A&B, provides
similar services on Kauai, as well as general trucking services.
(2) Marketing of Sugar and Coffee
Substantially all of the raw sugar produced in Hawaii is purchased, refined
and marketed by C&H Sugar Company, Inc. ("C&H"), of which A&B owns a 36 percent
common stock interest. The results of A&B's equity investment in C&H are
reported in A&B's financial statements as an investment in an affiliate. C&H
processes the raw cane sugar at its refinery at Crockett, California, and
markets the refined products primarily in the western and central United
States. HC&S markets its specialty food-grade raw sugars to food and beverage
producers and to retail stores under its Maui Brand(R) label, and to
distributors which repackage the sugars under their own labels. HC&S's largest
food-grade raw sugar customers are Cumberland Packing Corp. and Sugar Foods
Corporation, which repackage HC&S's turbinado sugar for their "Sugar in the
Raw" products.
Hawaiian Sugar & Transportation Cooperative ("HS&TC"), a cooperative
consisting of the two remaining sugar cane growers in Hawaii (including HC&S),
has a ten-year supply contract with C&H, ending in June 2003, pursuant to which
the growers sell their raw sugar to C&H at a price equal to the New York #14
Contract settlement price, less a discount and less costs of sugar vessel
discharge and stevedoring. This price, after deducting the marketing,
operating, distribution, transportation and interest costs of HS&TC, reflects
the gross revenue to the Hawaii sugar growers, including HC&S. Notwithstanding
the ten-year supply contract, HC&S arranged directly with C&H for the forward
pricing of a substantial portion of its 2001 harvest, as described in Item 7A
("Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk") below. In
addition, as of January 15, 2002, 30% of the expected 2002 harvest has been
forward priced.
At Kauai Coffee, coffee marketing efforts are directed toward developing a
market for premium-priced, estate-grown Kauai green coffee. Most of the coffee
crop is being marketed on the U.S. Mainland and in Asia as green (unroasted)
coffee. In addition to the sale of green coffee, Kauai Coffee produces and
sells roasted, packaged coffee in Hawaii under the "Kauai Coffee" trademark.
(3) Competition and Sugar Legislation
Hawaii sugar growers produce more sugar per acre than other major producing
areas of the world, but that advantage is partially offset by Hawaii's high
labor costs and the distance to the U.S. Mainland market. Hawaiian refined
sugar is marketed primarily west of Chicago. This is also the largest beet
sugar growing and processing area and, as a result, the only market area in the
United States which produces more sugar than it consumes. Sugar from sugar
beets is the greatest source of competition in the refined sugar market for the
Hawaiian sugar industry.
The overall U.S. caloric sweetener market continues to grow. The use of
non-caloric (artificial) sweeteners accounts for a relatively small percentage
of the domestic sweetener market. The anticipated increased use of high
fructose corn syrup and artificial sweeteners is not expected to affect sugar
markets significantly in the near future.
The U.S. Congress historically has sought, through legislation, to assure a
reliable domestic supply of sugar at stable and reasonable prices. The current
protective legislation for domestic sugar, the Federal Agriculture Improvement
and Reform Act (the "1996 Farm Bill"), provides a sugar loan program for the
1996 through 2002 crops, with a loan rate (support price) of 18 cents per pound
for raw sugar. The loan rate represents the value of sugar given as collateral
for government price-support loans. The government is required to administer
the sugar program at no net cost, and this is accomplished by adjusting fees
and quotas for imported sugar to maintain the domestic price at a level that
discourages producers from defaulting on loans. The ten-year supply contract
between HS&TC and C&H limits HC&S's ability to place sugar under loan pursuant
to the sugar loan program. The 1996 Farm Bill also eliminated marketing
allotments, thereby removing the means of limiting domestic production. The
1.25-million-ton minimum import quota set under the General Agreement on Tariff
and Trade ("GATT") is retained in the 1996 Act.
12
During 2001, legislation was developed for a new omnibus farm bill ("2002
Farm Bill"). A House farm bill, entitled the Farm Security Act of 2001, was
approved by the U.S. House of Representatives on October 5, 2001. Among other
things, that bill seeks to continue for ten years the current marketing loan
program at current loan rates for sugar, and seeks to reestablish marketing
allotments which are expected to stabilize prices. A Senate farm bill, with
identical provisions for sugar, was approved by the U.S. Senate on February 13,
2002. The 2002 Farm Bill is expected to be approved in 2002.
In 2001, U.S. domestic raw sugar prices averaged 21.09 cents per pound,
above the 20-year lows experienced in 2000, but still below historical
averages. The pricing situation has improved, but continues to be challenging,
even to efficient producers like HC&S. A chronological chart of the average
U.S. domestic raw sugar prices, based on the average daily New York Contract
#14 settlement price for domestic raw sugar, is shown below:
[CHART]
Jan-98 22.11
FEB 21.79
MAR 21.74
APR 22.2
MAY 22.28
JUN 22.298
JUL 22.32
AUG 22.3
SEP 22.25
OCT 22.15
NOV 22.03
DEC 21.97
Jan-99 22.41
FEB 22.34
MAR 22.55
APR 22.58
MAY 22.65
JUN 22.63
JUL 22.61
AUG 21.31
SEP 20.10
OCT 20.51
NOV 17.45
DEC 17.67
Jan-00 17.70
FEB 17.05
MAR 18.46
APR 19.41
MAY 19.12
JUN 19.26
JUL 17.64
AUG 18.13
SEP 18.97
OCT 21.20
NOV 21.39
DEC 20.53
Jan-01 20.81
FEB 21.18
MAR 21.40
APR 21.51
MAY 21.19
JUN 21.04
JUL 20.64
AUG 21.01
SEP 20.87
OCT 20.85
NOV 21.19
DEC 21.35
Liberalized international trade agreements, such as the GATT, include
provisions relating to agriculture which can affect the U.S. sugar or sweetener
industries materially. A "side" agreement that modified the North American Free
Trade Agreement ("NAFTA") alleviated some of the sugar producers' concerns by
limiting Mexico's exports of sugar to the U.S. under NAFTA. However, the export
ceiling provided for in the side agreement increased to 250,000 tons of sugar
in 2000, and will be eliminated in 2007. The increased sugar supply could
affect domestic sugar prices adversely.
Kauai Coffee competes with coffee growers located worldwide, including
Hawaii. Due to an oversupply of coffee in the marketplace, coffee commodity
prices dropped significantly in 2000 and continued to drop to record lows in
2001.
(4) Properties and Water
The HC&S sugar plantation, the largest in Hawaii, consists of approximately
43,300 acres of land, including 2,000 acres leased from the State of Hawaii and
1,300 acres under lease from private parties. Over 37,000 acres are under
cultivation, and the balance either is used for contributory purposes, such as
roads and plant sites, or is not suitable for cultivation.
McBryde owns approximately 9,500 acres of land on Kauai, of which
approximately 2,400 acres are used for watershed and other conservation uses,
approximately 3,400 acres are used by Kauai Coffee, and the remaining acreage
is leased to various agricultural enterprises for cultivation of a variety of
crops and for pasturage.
Large quantities of water are needed by HC&S and Kauai Coffee for their
sugar cane and coffee growing operations. Because of the importance of water,
access to water, reliable sources of supply and efficient irrigation systems
are crucial for the successful growing of sugar cane and coffee. A&B's
plantations use a "drip" irrigation system that distributes water to the roots
through small holes in plastic tubes. All of the cultivated cane land farmed by
HC&S is drip irrigated. All of Kauai Coffee's fields also are drip irrigated.
13
A&B owns 16,000 acres of watershed lands on Maui, which supply a portion of
the irrigation water used by HC&S. A&B also held four water licenses to 38,000
acres owned by the State of Hawaii, which over the years supplied approximately
one-third of the irrigation water used by HC&S. The last of these water license
agreements expired in 1986, and all four agreements have since been extended as
revocable permits that are renewable annually. In 2001, a request was made to
the State Board of Land and Natural Resources to replace these revocable
permits with a long-term water lease. Pending a contested case hearing before
the Board on the request for the long-term lease, the Board approved a
month-to-month holdover of the existing permits.
D. Employees and Labor Relations
As of December 31, 2001, A&B and its subsidiaries had approximately 2,054
regular full-time employees. About 916 regular full-time employees were engaged
in the growing of sugar cane and coffee and the production of raw sugar and
green coffee, 927 were engaged in ocean transportation, 44 were engaged in
property development and management, and the balance was in administration and
miscellaneous operations. Approximately 55% were covered by collective
bargaining agreements with unions.
As of December 31, 2001, Matson and its subsidiaries also had approximately
317 seagoing employees. Approximately 26% of Matson's regular full-time
employees and all of the seagoing employees were covered by collective
bargaining agreements.
Historically, collective bargaining with longshore and seagoing unions has
been complex and difficult. However, Matson and Matson Terminals consider their
relations with those unions, other unions, and their non-union employees
generally to be satisfactory.
Matson's seagoing employees are represented by six unions, three
representing unlicensed crew members and three representing licensed crew
members. Matson negotiates directly with these unions. Collective bargaining
agreements with the unions representing unlicensed crew members are expected to
be renewed in mid-2002 without service interruption.
SSA Terminals LLC ("SSAT"), the previously-described joint venture of Matson
and Stevedoring Services of America ("SSA"), provides stevedoring and terminal
services for Matson vessels calling at U.S. Pacific Coast ports. Matson, SSA,
and SSAT are members of the Pacific Maritime Association ("PMA") which, on
behalf of its members, negotiates collective bargaining agreements with the
International Longshore Workers Union ("ILWU") on the Pacific Coast. Matson
Terminals provides stevedoring and terminal services to Matson vessels calling
at Honolulu. Matson Terminals is a member of the Hawaii Stevedore Industry
Committee which, on behalf of its members, negotiates with the ILWU in Hawaii.
Collective bargaining agreements with ILWU longshore workers on the Pacific
Coast and in Hawaii are expected to be renewed in mid-2002 without service
interruption.
During 2001, Matson renewed its collective bargaining agreement with ILWU
clerical workers at Los Angeles for a three-year term and expects to renew its
agreement with ILWU clerical workers at Oakland in mid-2002 without service
interruption.
Matson contributed during 2001 to multi-employer pension plans for vessel
crews. If Matson were to withdraw from or significantly reduce its obligation
to contribute to one of the plans, Matson would review and evaluate data,
actuarial assumptions, calculations and other factors used in determining its
withdrawal liability, if any, and, in the event of material disagreement with
such determination, would pursue the various means available to it under
federal law for the adjustment or removal of its withdrawal liability. Matson
Terminals participates in a multi-employer pension plan for its Hawaii
longshore employees. For a discussion of withdrawal liabilities under the
Hawaii longshore and seagoing plans, see Note 10 to A&B's financial statements
in Item 8 below.
Bargaining unit employees of HC&S are covered by two collective bargaining
agreements with the ILWU. The agreements with the HC&S production unit
employees and clerical bargaining unit employees were extended in 2001 and will
expire January 31, 2003. A collective bargaining agreement with the ILWU for
production employees of
14
Hawaiian DuraGreen, Inc. was negotiated, but all production employees
subsequently were terminated in connection with the shutdown of the panelboard
plant. The collective bargaining agreements covering the two ILWU bargaining
units at Kahului Trucking & Storage, Inc. will expire on March 31, 2006 and on
June 30, 2002 (the latter is expected to be renewed without service
interruption). The two collective bargaining agreements with Kauai Commercial
Company, Incorporated employees represented by the ILWU were renegotiated in
2001 and will expire April 30, 2004. The collective bargaining agreement with
the ILWU for the production unit employees of Kauai Coffee was renegotiated in
2001 and will expire on January 31, 2004.
E. Energy
Matson and Matson Terminals purchase residual fuel oil, lubricants, gasoline
and diesel fuel for their operations. Residual fuel oil is by far Matson's
largest energy-related expense. In 2001, Matson vessels consumed approximately
1.8 million barrels of residual fuel oil, the same as in 2000.
Residual fuel oil prices paid by Matson started in 2001 at $127.50 per
metric ton and ended the year at $103.00 per metric ton. A high of $180.50 per
metric ton occurred in June, and a low of $92.00 per metric ton occurred in
November. Sufficient fuel for Matson's requirements is expected to be available
in 2002.
As has been the practice with sugar plantations throughout Hawaii, HC&S uses
bagasse, the residual fiber of the sugar cane plant, as a fuel to generate
steam for the production of most of the electrical power for sugar milling and
irrigation pumping operations. In addition to bagasse, HC&S uses diesel fuel
oil, boiler fuel oil, and coal to produce power, principally for pumping
irrigation water during the factory shutdown period when bagasse is not being
produced. Since 1992, when suppliers of boiler fuel oil to HC&S discontinued
regular shipments as a result of unlimited liability concerns arising from
federal and state environmental laws, boiler fuel oil has been provided to HC&S
on a space available basis. In 2001, HC&S produced 203,650 MWH of electric
power and sold 61,074 MWH, compared with 217,279 MWH produced and 67,105 MWH
sold in 2000. The reduction in power produced and sold was caused by HC&S's
increased need to pump irrigation water, due to drought conditions. HC&S's oil
use decreased to 68,999 barrels in 2001, from the 100,313 barrels used in 2000.
Coal use for power generation increased, from 61,222 short tons in 2000 to
62,389 short tons in 2001. The decrease in fuel oil used is attributed to
HC&S's shutdown of one of its two sugar mills in 2000.
In 2001, McBryde produced 30,637 MWH of hydroelectric power, compared with
31,971 MWH of hydroelectric power produced in 2000. Power sales in 2001
amounted to 21,216 MWH, compared with 23,375 MWH sold in 2000. The reduction in
power production and sales was due primarily to continued drought conditions in
2001.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
See "Business and Properties--Ocean Transportation--Rate Regulation" above
for a discussion of rate and other regulatory matters in which Matson is
routinely involved.
On September 14, 1998, Matson was served with a complaint filed by the
Government of Guam with the Surface Transportation Board ("STB"), alleging that
Sea-Land Services, Inc. ("Sea-Land"), American President Lines, Ltd. ("APL")
and Matson have charged unreasonable rates in the Guam trade since January
1991. Matson did not enter the trade until February 1996. On November 12, 1998,
Matson filed an answer, denying that its rates have been unreasonable. Matson,
Sea-Land and APL filed a joint motion to dismiss the complaint on February 16,
1999. On November 15, 2001, the STB issued a decision, granting the motion in
part and denying it in part. The STB dismissed the claim of discrimination,
dismissed the aggregate rate challenge for shipments prior to September 10,
1996, dismissed APL as a defendant based on the statute of limitations, and
permitted the Caribbean Shippers Association to intervene. The parties have
until April 9, 2002 to file initial briefs addressing the appropriate rate
reasonableness methodology to be applied to the remaining issue of whether the
aggregate rates charged by Matson and Sea-Land in the Guam trade after
September 10, 1996 are reasonable. Reply briefs will be due on June 3, 2002.
15
A&B and its subsidiaries are parties to, or may be contingently liable in
connection with, other legal actions arising in the normal conduct of their
businesses, the outcomes of which, in the opinion of management after
consultation with counsel, would not have a material adverse effect on A&B's
results of operations or financial position.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Not applicable.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
For the information about executive officers of A&B required to be included
in this Part I, see paragraph B of "Directors and Executive Officers of the
Registrant" in Part III below, which is incorporated into Part I by reference.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
A&B common stock is listed on The Nasdaq Stock Market and trades under the
symbol "ALEX". As of February 14, 2002, there were 4,233 shareholders of record
of A&B common stock. In addition, Cede & Co., which appears as a single record
holder, represents the holdings of thousands of beneficial owners of A&B common
stock.
A summary of daily stock transactions is listed in the Nasdaq National
Market Issues section of major newspapers. Trading volume averaged 135,600
shares a day in 2001, compared with 98,900 in 2000 and 105,800 in 1999.
Currently, 19 firms make a market in ALEX.
The quarterly high and low sales prices and closing prices, as reported by
The Nasdaq Stock Market, and cash dividends paid per share of common stock, for
2000 and 2001, were as follows:
Market Price
Dividends -----------------------
Paid High Low Close
2001 --------- ------- ------- -------
----
First Quarter................ $0.225 $29.609 $21.063 $21.375
Second Quarter............... 0.225 25.840 20.610 25.750
Third Quarter................ 0.225 26.430 21.120 23.410
Fourth Quarter............... 0.225 27.920 21.600 26.700
2000
----
First Quarter................ $0.225 $22.783 $17.938 $20.625
Second Quarter............... 0.225 24.625 19.250 22.063
Third Quarter................ 0.225 27.500 21.875 26.000
Fourth Quarter............... 0.225 28.250 21.625 26.250
Although A&B expects to continue paying quarterly cash dividends on its
common stock, the declaration and payment of dividends in the future are
subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend upon A&B's
financial condition, results of operations, cash requirements and other factors
deemed relevant by the Board of Directors. A&B strives to pay the highest
possible dividends commensurate with operating and capital needs. A&B has paid
cash dividends in every quarter since 1903. The most recent increase in the
quarterly dividend rate was effective in the first quarter of 1998, from 22
cents a share to 22.5 cents. In 2001, dividend payments to shareholders
16
totaled $36.5 million, which was 33% of reported net income for the year. The
following dividend schedule for 2002 has been set, subject to final approval by
the Board of Directors:
Quarterly Dividend Declaration Date Record Date Payment Date
------------------ ---------------- ----------- ------------
First....... January 24 February 14 March 7
Second...... April 25 May 6 June 6
Third....... June 27 August 1 September 5
Fourth...... October 24 November 7 December 5
A&B common stock is included in the Dow Jones Transportation Index, the Dow
Jones Composite Index, the Dow Jones Marine Transportation Index, the Dow Jones
Sustainability Group Index and the S&P MidCap 400 Index.
The number of shares of A&B common stock repurchased by A&B during each of
the three years ended December 31, 2001 was as follows:
Shares Average Price
Year Repurchased (per share)
---- ----------- -------------
2001......................... 105,000 $21.61
2000......................... 2,378,195 $20.29
1999......................... 1,564,500 $22.26
17
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following financial data should be read in conjunction with Item 8,
"Financial Statements and Supplementary Data," and Item 7, "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" :
2001 2000 1999 1998 1997
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per-share amounts)
ANNUAL OPERATIONS
Total revenue/1/............................. $1,190,073 $1,068,646 $ 999,998 $1,343,475 $1,310,176
Deduct:
Cost of goods sold and operating expenses/1/. 908,777 849,375 812,783 1,174,881 1,065,470
Depreciation and amortization............... 75,433 72,304 73,901 88,500 88,558
Interest expense............................ 18,658 24,252 17,774 24,799 28,936
Income taxes................................ 67,392 44,391 32,961 24,352 45,825
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Income from continuing operations before
accounting changes......................... 119,813 78,324 62,579 30,943 81,387
Discontinued operations...................... (9,185) -- -- -- --
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
methods.................................... -- 12,250 -- (5,801) --
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Net income................................... $ 110,628 $ 90,574 $ 62,579 $ 25,142 $ 81,387
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Comprehensive income......................... $ 48,691 $ 103,050 $ 48,711 $ 33,327 $ 88,326
Earnings per share before accounting changes:
Basic....................................... $ 2.96 $ 1.92 $ 1.45 $ 0.69 $ 1.80
Diluted..................................... $ 2.94 $ 1.91 $ 1.45 $ 0.69 $ 1.80
Return on beginning equity................... 15.9% 13.5% 9.0% 3.5% 11.9%
Cash dividends per share..................... $ 0.90 $ 0.90 $ 0.90 $ 0.90 $ 0.88
Average number of shares outstanding......... 40,535 40,898 43,206 44,760 45,182
Gross profit percentage/1/................... 23.6% 23.0% 22.1% 17.0% 20.1%
Effective income tax rate.................... 36.0% 36.5% 34.5% 45.4% 36.0%
MARKET PRICE RANGE PER SHARE
High........................................ $ 29.609 $ 28.250 $ 27.125 $ 31.125 $ 29.375
Low......................................... 20.610 17.938 18.625 18.813 24.375
Close....................................... 26.700 26.250 22.813 23.250 27.313
AT YEAR END
Shareholders of record...................... 4,252 4,438 4,761 5,125 5,481
Shares outstanding.......................... 40,529 40,353 42,526 44,028 44,881
Shareholders' equity........................ $ 710,667 $ 693,651 $ 670,963 $ 694,642 $ 719,588
Per-share................................. 17.54 17.19 15.78 15.78 16.03
Total assets................................ 1,544,419 1,666,012 1,561,460 1,605,640 1,704,798
Working capital............................. 24,445 55,861 59,805 67,113 114,806
Cash and cash equivalents................... 19,291 3,451 3,333 86,818 21,623
Real estate developments - noncurrent....... 47,840 62,628 60,810 57,690 68,056
Investments - noncurrent.................... 33,021 183,141 158,726 159,068 102,813
Capital Construction Fund................... 158,737 150,405 145,391 143,303 148,610
Long-term debt - noncurrent................. 207,378 330,766 277,570 255,766 292,885
Current ratio............................... 1.1 to 1 1.4 to 1 1.4 to 1 1.4 to 1 1.7 to 1
Capital stock price/earnings ratio.......... 9.8 to 1 11.9 to 1 15.7 to 1 41.5 to 1 15.2 to 1
- --------
/1/ See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for
information regarding changes which were made in 2000 in presentation for
certain revenues and expenses.
18
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
The following analysis of the consolidated financial condition and results
of operations of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively,
the "Company") should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and related notes thereto.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The Company, from time to time, may make or may have made certain
forward-looking statements, whether orally or in writing, such as forecasts and
projections of the Company's future performance or statements of management's
plans and objectives. These statements are "forward-looking" statements as that
term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such
forward-looking statements may be contained in, among other things, Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings, such as the Forms 10-K, press releases
made by the Company, the Company's Internet Web sites (including Web sites of
its subsidiaries), and oral statements made by the officers of the Company.
Except for historical information contained in these written or oral
communications, such communications contain forward-looking statements. These
forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties that
could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the
statements, including, but not limited to: (1) impact of events of September
11, 2001; (2) economic conditions in Hawaii and elsewhere; (3) market demand;
(4) competitive factors and pricing pressures in the Company's primary markets;
(5) legislative and regulatory environments at the federal, state and local
levels, such as government rate regulations, land-use regulations, government
administration of the U.S. sugar program, and modifications to or retention of
cabotage laws; (6) dependence on third-party suppliers; (7) fuel prices; (8)
raw sugar prices; (9) labor relations; (10) risks associated with current or
future litigation and resolution of tax issues with the IRS and state tax
authorities; (11) the performance of unconsolidated affiliates and ventures;
and (12) other risk factors described elsewhere in these communications and
from time to time in the Company's filings with the SEC.
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Consolidated Earnings and Revenue: Net income in 2001 was $110,628,000, or
$2.73 per basic share, versus $90,574,000, or $2.21 per basic share, in 2000
and $62,579,000, or $1.45 per basic share, in 1999. Revenue in 2001 was
$1,190,073,000, compared with revenue of $1,068,646,000 in 2000 and
$999,998,000 in 1999.
Accounting Changes and Significant Transactions
2001: Results for 2001 include the sales of the Company's marketable
equity securities. The sales of these securities resulted in cash receipts of
approximately $134,722,000, pre-tax gains of approximately $125,478,000 and
after-tax gains of about $77,788,000 ($1.92 per basic share). The Company also
donated appreciated stock with an approximate fair value of $7,500,000 to its
charitable foundation. These sales are described more fully in Note 5 to the
consolidated financial statements included in Item 8.
The Company reduced the carrying value of its equity investments in C&H
Sugar Company, Inc. ("C&H") by $28,600,000. This resulted in an after-tax
charge of $17,732,000 ($0.44 per basic share). In addition, the Company wrote
off $4,823,000 of power generation equipment, resulting in a $3,087,000
after-tax charge to earnings ($0.08 per basic share). These impairments are
discussed more fully in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements
included in Item 8.
The Company discontinued and abandoned its panelboard manufacturing
subsidiary on Maui. This discontinued operation resulted in a $9,185,000
after-tax charge to earnings ($0.23 per basic share). This is described in Note
3 to the consolidated Financial statements included in Item 8.
2000: The Company made two changes in accounting methods (See Note 2 to
the consolidated financial statements). The first change was for vessel
drydocking costs at Matson. Previously, the estimated costs for future
drydocking of vessels were accrued in advance of the drydocking. Subsequent
payments were charged against the accrued liability. Under the new method,
drydocking expenditures that benefit future periods are capitalized and
19
depreciated. This change increased 2000 net income by $12,250,000 (net of
income tax expense of $7,668,000), or $0.29 per basic share. The second change
was for the presentation of certain costs recorded in the ocean transportation
and property leasing segments, which previously were recorded as an offset to
revenue. This change did not affect net income.
1999: Following continuing operating losses, depressed coffee prices and
negative cash flows at Kauai Coffee Company, Inc. ("Kauai Coffee"), the
Company's coffee plantation, the Company recorded an after-tax charge of
$9,571,000, or $0.22 per basic share, to write down the recorded value of
orchards and other non-current assets to their estimated fair values.
RESULTS OF INDUSTRY SEGMENT OPERATIONS
Detailed information related to the operations and financial performance of
the Company's Industry Segments is included in Note 14 of Item 8 "Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data." The following information should be read in
relation to information contained in that Note.
2001 Compared with 2000
Ocean Transportation revenue of $796,840,000 was $53,852,000, or six
percent, lower than the $850,692,000 reported for 2000. Operating profit of
$62,264,000 was $31,468,000, or 34 percent, lower than the $93,732,000 reported
during the prior year. The revenue and operating profit declines were directly
attributable to cargo volumes and productivity issues.
Matson's total Hawaii Service container volume, at 149,636 units, was one
percent lower than 2000 container volume of 151,496 units. Matson's total
Hawaii Service automobile volume, at 122,389 units, was seven percent lower
than 2000 automobile volume of 132,186 units. The lower cargo and automobile
volumes were primarily the result of the weakened Hawaii economy following the
September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States of America. These
attacks had a significantly adverse effect on air travel. This reduced Hawaii
tourism and, in turn, significantly reduced the fourth quarter carriage of
commercial cargo and automobiles to Hawaii. In January 2002, Matson reduced the
number of vessels in the Hawaii Service from eight to seven.
In addition to the lower container and automobile carriage, transition
problems related to a terminal improvement project at Matson's Honolulu
terminal reduced productivity during the fourth quarter. Lower results from
Matson's investments in a shipping operation in Puerto Rico and from a
stevedoring joint venture also adversely affected the total-year results.
A 3.5 percent increase in Hawaii Service rates announced in 2000 took effect
in February 2001. Total fuel costs decreased by $7,609,000 in 2001 versus 2000,
resulting in a decrease in the fuel surcharge from 4.25% to 3.25%.
Property Leasing revenue of $70,685,000 was 14 percent higher than 2000
revenue of $62,105,000 and operating profit of $34,139,000 was 13 percent
higher than 2000 operating profit of $30,120,000. These increases were due
primarily to additions to the leased property portfolio and higher occupancy
levels in the Hawaii portfolio and increased royalty revenue. Occupancy levels
for the Mainland portfolio averaged 93 percent in 2001, versus 96 percent in
2000. The Company owned four million square feet of leasable improved property
on the Mainland at year-end 2001, the same as at the year-end 2000. Occupancy
levels for the Hawaii properties averaged 90% in 2001, versus 86% in 2000. The
Company owned 1.5 million square feet of leasable improved property in Hawaii
at year-end 2001 compared with 1.2 million square feet at year-end 2000.
Property Sales revenue of $89,156,000 for 2001 compared with $46,322,000 of
revenue a year earlier. Operating profit was $17,926,000 for 2001 compared with
operating profit of $24,228,000 for 2000. These fluctuations are due primarily
to the changed composition of sales during the two years.
20
The mix of property sales in any year can be diverse. Sales can include
property sold under threat of condemnation, developed residential real estate,
commercial properties, developable subdivision lots and undeveloped land. The
sale of undeveloped land and vacant parcels generally provides a greater
contribution margin than does the sale of residential, developed and commercial
property, due to the low historical-cost basis of the Company's Hawaii land.
Consequently, property sales revenue trends and the amount of real estate held
for sale on the balance sheets do not necessarily indicate future profitability
for this segment.
Sales in 2001 included a 14-acre parcel at Maui Business Park to Wal-Mart,
three commercial properties in Bainbridge, Washington, a four-acre parcel on
Maui, 82 residential properties and a 68-acre parcel for highway widening on
Maui. Sales in 2000 included a ground lease under a Costco store, a 13-acre
parcel at Maui Business Park, 16 business parcels and 28 residential properties.
Food Products revenue of $104,376,000 in 2001 compared with revenue of
$106,341,000 in 2000. Operating profit of $5,660,000 in 2001 was 25% lower than
the $7,522,000 earned in 2000. The benefits of higher domestic raw sugar and
molasses prices throughout 2001 and improved sales of natural sugars under the
Maui Brand(R) label were more than offset by a write-off of power generation
equipment which was no longer needed in the business, lower raw sugar
production and power sales, and lower results from A&B's minority investment in
C&H. The previously discussed impairment loss related to the Company's
investment in C&H was not included in segment operating profit.
HC&S produced 191,512 tons of raw sugar during 2001, compared with 210,269
tons a year earlier. This lower production was the result of harvesting nearly
12.5% fewer acres in 2001, compared with 2000, combined with extended drought
conditions. Although drought conditions on Maui have lessened in late 2001 and
early 2002, this remains a primary risk factor for this business segment's
operations.
For 2001, HC&S forward priced 95% of its 2001 crop at an average price of
$21.13/cwt. This forward pricing program started with the 2001 crop, following
an average sales price $19.10/cwt. for 2000. Through the forward pricing
program, HC&S expects to stabilize its 2002 raw sugar sales prices above
$21.00/cwt.
A panelboard business, Hawaiian DuraGreen, was discontinued, due to
depressed sales prices and production problems. This is described more fully in
Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8.
Other operating profit of $127,635,000 for 2001 was due primarily to the
sales of marketable equity securities during 2001. This is described more fully
in Note 5 of the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8.
2000 Compared with 1999
Ocean Transportation revenue of $850,692,000 was nine percent higher than
1999 revenue of $778,535,000. Operating profit of $93,732,000 showed a
12-percent improvement over 1999 operating profit of $83,778,000. Hawaii
service container volume in 2000 was flat compared with 1999 and automobile
volume was 31 percent higher. The primary revenue gains occurred in the
lower-margin intermodal business. Operating results for 2000 benefited from
improved performance by the Company's SSAT terminal operating joint venture and
by its Matson Intermodal System subsidiary. Operating results for 1999 were
affected adversely by lower productivity, due to disruptions related to the
1999 renegotiation of longshore labor agreements.
Matson's total Hawaii Service container volume was 151,496 units in 2000,
compared with 151,215 units in 1999. Matson's total Hawaii Service automobile
volume, at 132,186 units, was 31 percent higher than 1999 automobile volume of
101,095 units.
A 3.9 percent increase in Hawaii Service rates announced in 1999 took effect
in February 2000. To mitigate partially the effect of rising fuel prices, the
1.75 percent fuel surcharge in effect at the end of 1999 was increased, in
three steps, to 4.25 percent during 2000. Total fuel costs increased by
$17,900,000 in 2000 versus 1999. This increased cost was only partially offset
by the fuel surcharge.
21
Property Leasing revenue of $62,105,000 was 15 percent higher than 1999
revenue of $53,910,000, and operating profit of $30,120,000 improved ten
percent compared with 1999 operating profit of $27,497,000. These improvements
were due to higher occupancy levels, increased rents and newly acquired
properties. Occupancy rates for the Mainland properties averaged 96 percent in
2000, versus 94 percent in 1999. The Company owned four million square feet of
leasable property on the Mainland at year-end 2000, compared with 3.1 million
square feet at year-end 1999. Occupancy levels for the Hawaii properties
averaged 86 percent in 2000, versus 81 percent in 1999. The Company owned 1.2
million square feet of leasable property in Hawaii at the end of both 2000 and
1999.
Property Sales revenue of $46,322,000 was down slightly from the $48,036,000
in sales recorded in 1999, while operating profit of $24,228,000 was 39 percent
higher than the $17,402,000 achieved in 1999, due to mix. Property sales in
2000 included the ground lease for a Costco store, a 13-acre parcel at Maui
Business Park, 16 business parcels and 28 residential properties. Sales in 1999
included an office/research building in Seattle, two developed business
parcels, three undeveloped parcels and 41 residential properties.
Food Products revenue of $106,341,000 in 2000 compared with revenue of
$116,362,000 in 1999. Operating profit of $7,522,000 in 2000 was 33 percent
lower than the $11,310,000 earned in 1999. The primary reasons for the declines
were U.S. raw sugar prices, which were 20 percent below historical levels,
lower raw sugar production that resulted from continuing drought conditions on
the island of Maui, and the write down of certain assets associated with the
closure of the Company's raw sugar processing factory in Paia, Maui, which
consolidated the processing operation into one factory. These factors were
offset partially by benefit plan settlement gains, insurance-related gains at
Hawaiian Commercial & Sugar Company ("HC&S"), the Company's raw sugar producing
unit on Maui, and a profit turnaround at Kauai Coffee.
Although HC&S harvested about the same number of acres, sugar production of
approximately 210,000 tons in 2000 was eight percent lower than the prior
year's production of 228,000 tons. Lower production was due to the drought
conditions noted earlier. The average No. 14 domestic raw sugar price for 2000
was $19.10/cwt. This was $3.08/cwt. below 1999's price of $22.18/cwt. and was
the lowest level in 20 years.
Results from Kauai Coffee showed a small profit for 2000, following a
successful business re-engineering in 1999, which included the write-down of
its orchards and processing equipment to fair values and the implementation of
other business process improvements. In addition, sales and marketing efforts
were improved during 2000.
ECONOMIC OUTLOOK
Although none of the Company's operations were directly affected by the East
Coast terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the events compounded
pre-existing concerns about the outlook for Hawaii's economy. They also created
unprecedented uncertainty about how to assess the extent, pace and duration of
the decline that continues to be felt throughout the United States. Pre-dating
the terrorist attacks were a slowing of the United States' economy and the
economic challenges in Asia. The combination of these events had a significant
effect on 2001 fourth quarter tourism and, consequently, A&B's Ocean
Transportation cargo volumes were lower than in previous quarters. The effect
on real-estate activities was moderate and there was little effect on the
Company's Food Products segment.
The performance of the Ocean Transportation segment for 2002 will depend on
Matson's realizing the benefits of its Honolulu terminal improvement project,
balancing its service levels and cost structure to shipper demand and improving
returns from both its shipping investment in Puerto Rico and its stevedoring
joint venture.
Even assuming continued economic recovery, Property Management & Development
operating profit for 2002 is expected to be modestly lower than 2001 operating
profit. Property leasing activity is forecast to continue at a steadily rising
pace, due to properties acquired in 2001, rent rollovers and possible new
acquisitions. Property sales revenue is expected to exceed 2001 sales revenue,
but the contribution to operating profit is expected to be lower, due to the
mix of higher basis property sales in 2002. Investment opportunities, in both
development and income-producing properties, and especially in Hawaii, remain a
primary growth focus.
22
The 2002 outlook for Food Products includes stable raw sugar prices, greater
raw-sugar production, as drought conditions reverse, and tight cost controls.
These positive factors are expected to boost Food Products' operating profit in
2002.
In the aggregate, with the combination of operating profit growth from a low
base in Ocean Transportation, stable growth in Property Leasing, the timing of
real-estate sales, the normal seasonality of the Food Products segment, and
economic growth in Hawaii, it is likely that operating profit during the first
two, and possibly three, quarters of 2002 will be lower than comparable 2001
periods. It is expected that this would be followed by a return to more normal
trends by the end of 2002.
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
Liquid Resources: Liquid resources of the Company, comprising cash and cash
equivalents, receivables, inventories and unused lines of credit, less accrued
deposits to the Capital Construction Fund (CCF), totaled $527,856,000 at
December 31, 2001, an increase of $282,784,000 from December 31, 2000. This net
increase was due primarily to additional credit facilities (see next paragraph
and Note 8), lower balances drawn on continuing facilities and higher cash
balances, partially offset by the termination of a $25,000,000 credit facility
that had expired in late 2000 and lower trade receivable balances.
New Financing Agreements: During 2001, the Company increased its revolving
credit and term loan agreement from $140,000,000 to $185,000,000 and extended
the term of the facility for three years, entered into a $50,000,000 private
shelf agreement and withdrew from a $25,000,000 uncommitted credit facility. In
addition, the Company's subsidiary, Matson, added a new $40,000,000 revolving
credit agreement and entered into a $50,000,000 private shelf agreement. This
additional capacity is reflected in liquid resources and the nature of the
facilities are described more fully in Note 8 to the consolidated financial
statements. These new and increased credit facilities may be used for possible
future real estate and ocean transportation related capital investments and
acquisitions.
Working Capital: Working capital was $24,445,000 at December 31, 2001, a
decrease of $31,416,000 from a year earlier. The lower working capital was due
primarily to higher income taxes and accounts payable, and to lower trade
receivables and prepaid assets, partially offset by higher other assets held
for sale and cash balances. The higher amount of income taxes payable was due
to the sale of BancWest Corporation shares in late December 2001. The lower
trade receivables balance was due primarily to a decrease in ocean
transportation revenue and to the timing of billing cycles that overlap
year-end. Higher other assets held for sale was due primarily to the
anticipated sale of two vessels, as described in Note 5 to the consolidated
financial statements. The fluctuations in accounts payable and prepaid assets
were in the ordinary course of business.
Receivables: At December 31, 2001, the Company had receivables totaling
$130,491,000, compared with $141,553,000 a year earlier. These amounts are net
of allowances for doubtful accounts of $7,252,000 and $6,579,000, respectively.
The decline in receivables was mainly the result of lower Matson cargo during
the fourth quarter of 2001. The Company's management believes that the quality
of these receivables is good and that its reserves are adequate.
Operating Cash Flows: Net cash provided by operations was $150,968,000 and
$104,278,000 for 2001 and 2000, respectively. Net operating cash flows were
used principally for capital expenditures, payments of debt, dividends,
repurchases of capital stock and deposits into the CCF. Withdrawals from the
CCF in 2001 were used principally for vessel modifications and equipment
purchases. Approximately $41,928,000 of taxes related to the December sales of
marketable equity securities was accrued as a current liability at year-end.
Although this improved 2001 operating cash flows, when the taxes are paid, 2002
operating cash flows will be comparably reduced.
Capital Additions: Capital additions comprise capital expenditures for
property and capital expenditures for real property (including the
re-deployment of non-cash tax deferred funds to purchase property) but excludes
capital expenditures for real-estate developments held for sale, since this
latter item is treated as inventory on the
23
balance sheets. Capital additions during 2001 were $141,440,000, compared with
$106,904,000 in 2000. Ocean transportation capital additions in 2001 of
$59,669,000 were primarily for terminal improvements, vessel modifications,
technology investments and the acquisition of container and terminal equipment.
Property development and management capital additions in 2001 of $72,050,000
included $42,257,000 for the redeployment of tax deferred sales proceeds into
similar income producing assets and $29,793,000 for the development of real
estate, for improvements to leased properties, and for the purchase of
developed commercial property. Food products capital additions in 2001 of
$9,454,000 were primarily for routine factory modifications and replacements.
Other Financing Arrangements: As described in Notes 5 and 13 to the
consolidated financial statements, the Company or its subsidiaries guarantee
$31,500,000 of debt of an unconsolidated affiliate, guarantee up to $15,000,000
of debt of an unconsolidated sugar marketing and transportation cooperative,
and have $26,019,000 of standby letters of credit. These amounts are not
recorded on the Company's balance sheet. The Company does not currently expect
that it will be called upon to advance funds under these commitments.
Other Commitments: Capital expenditures approved but not yet spent were
$77,633,000 at December 31, 2001. These expenditures are primarily for real
estate developments held for investment purposes, containers and operating
equipment and vessel modifications. For 2002, internal cash flows and
short-term borrowing facilities are expected to be sufficient to finance
working capital needs, dividends, capital expenditures and debt service.
Contingencies: The Company and certain subsidiaries are parties to various
legal actions and are contingently liable in connection with claims and
contracts arising in the normal course of business, the outcome of which, in
the opinion of management after consultation with legal counsel, will not have
a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or results of
operations.
OTHER MATTERS
Tax-Deferred Real Estate Exchanges: In 2001, the Company sold, on a
tax-deferred basis, nine properties for $31,854,000. These included the sales
of a 14-acre industrial lot to Wal-Mart, three commercial properties in
Bainbridge, Washington and a four-acre parcel on Maui and the sale under threat
of condemnation of a 68-acre parcel on Maui for highway widening. During the
year, the Company reinvested $42,257,000 in four replacement properties. At
December 31, 2001, $2,200,000 of tax deferred proceeds had not been reinvested
compared to $12,900,000 at the end of 2000.
Funds received in tax-deferred sales of like-kind property are held by a
third party agent and are included in other non-current assets on the Balance
Sheets. These proceeds and the subsequent purchases of replacement property are
reported in the Statements of Cash Flows under the caption "Non-cash
Activities." Funds received for sales under threat of condemnation are not
required to be held by a third party agent and are included in cash flows from
investing activities.
Environmental Matters: As with most industrial and land-development
companies of its size, the Company's operations have certain risks that could
result in expenditures for environmental remediation. The Company believes that
it is in compliance, in all material respects, with applicable environmental
laws and regulations, and works proactively to identify potential environmental
concerns. Management believes that appropriate liabilities have been accrued
for environmental matters.
Dependence on Information Technology Systems: The Company is partially
dependent on information technology systems to support its ability to conduct
business. These dependencies primarily include accounting, billing, payable,
cargo booking, vessel scheduling and stowage, banking, payrolls and employee
communications. All of these systems are vulnerable to reliability issues,
integration and compatibility concerns, and security-threatening intrusions.
The Company has had no significant instances of interruption to these systems.
Management believes that its information technology and systems are adequate
to meet the requirements of its business and operations. It continues to make
investments of capital for infrastructure, system development and
24
maintenance, system security and staffing and staff development. However, there
can be no assurances that future incidents, whether accidental or malicious,
could not affect adversely the function of the Company's information systems
and operations.
Significant Accounting Policies: The Company's significant accounting
policies and the impacts of newly issued accounting standards are described in
Notes 1 and 2 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8.
Management Changes: During 2001, the Company hired Raymond L. Smith as
Matson's Chief Operating Officer, a newly created position, and hired Matthew
J. Cox as Matson's Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Controller, the latter replacing Raymond J. Donohue, who retired. Also, in
2001, Christopher J. Benjamin joined A&B as Director of Corporate Development
and Planning, and Michael G. Wright joined A&B Properties, Inc. as Vice
President, Acquisitions and Investments.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
A&B, in the normal course of doing business, is exposed to the risks
associated with fluctuations in the market value of certain financial
instruments. A&B maintains a portfolio of investments, pension fund investments
and, through its Capital Construction Fund, an investment in mortgage-backed
securities. Details regarding these financial instruments are described in
Notes 4, 5, 7 and 10 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8,
"Financial Statements and Supplementary Data."
A&B also is exposed to changes in U.S. interest rates, primarily as a result
of its borrowing and investing activities used to maintain liquidity and to
fund business operations. Details regarding these matters are described in Note
8 in Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." The Company does
not use interest rate derivative instruments such as interest rate swaps,
currency swaps, futures or options, to manage its exposure to interest rate
risk or for speculative purposes but may choose to use such instruments to
manage interest rate risk in the future.
A&B's sugar plantation, HC&S, has a contract to sell its raw sugar
production to Hawaiian Sugar & Transportation Cooperative ("HS&TC"), an
unconsolidated sugar and marketing cooperative, in which the Company has an
ownership interest, until June 2003. Under that contract, the price paid will
fluctuate with the New York Contract #14 settlement price for domestic raw
sugar, less a fixed discount. The Company also has an agreement with C&H Sugar
Company, Inc, the primary purchaser of sugar from HS&TC, which allows the
Company to forward price, with C&H, a portion of its raw sugar deliveries to
HS&TC.
The Company has no direct material exposure to foreign currency risks,
although it is indirectly affected by changes in currency rates to the extent
that this affects tourism in Hawaii.
A&B believes that, as of December 31, 2001, its exposure to market risk
fluctuations for its financial instruments was not material.
25
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Page
----
Management's Report............................................. 27
Independent Auditors' Report.................................... 28
Consolidated Statements of Income............................... 29
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows........................... 30
Consolidated Balance Sheets..................................... 31
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity................. 32
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements...................... 33
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies............... 33
2. Changes in Accounting Methods............................ 36
3. Discontinued Operations.................................. 36
4. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Investments.......... 37
5. Investments.............................................. 38
6. Property................................................. 40
7. Capital Construction Fund................................ 40
8. Notes Payable and Long-term Debt......................... 41
9. Leases................................................... 42
10. Employee Benefit Plans................................... 44
11. Income Taxes............................................. 47
12. Stock Options............................................ 47
13. Related Party Transactions, Commitments and Contingencies 50
14. Industry Segments........................................ 50
15. Quarterly Information (Unaudited)........................ 53
16. Parent Company Condensed Financial Information........... 55
26
MANAGEMENT'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL REPORTING
The management of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. has the responsibility for
preparing the accompanying consolidated financial statements and related notes
accurately and objectively. The statements have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America,
consistently applied, and necessarily include amounts based on judgments and
estimates made by management. Management also prepared the other information in
this annual report and is responsible for its accuracy and consistency with the
consolidated financial statements.
The Company maintains internal control systems, and related policies and
procedures, designed to provide reasonable assurance that assets are
safeguarded, that transactions are properly executed and recorded in accordance
with management's authorization, and that underlying accounting records may be
relied upon for the accurate preparation of the consolidated financial
statements and other financial information. The design, monitoring and revision
of internal control systems involve, among other things, management's judgment
with respect to the relative cost and expected benefits of specific control
measures. The Company maintains an internal auditing function that evaluates
and formally reports on the adequacy and effectiveness of internal controls,
policies and procedures.
The Company's consolidated financial statements have been audited by
Deloitte & Touche LLP, its independent auditors, who have expressed their
opinion with respect to the fairness, in all material aspects, of the
presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows under
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Management has made available to Deloitte & Touche LLP all of the Company's
financial records and related data. Furthermore, management believes that all
representations made to Deloitte & Touche LLP during its audit were valid and
appropriate.
The Board of Directors, through its Audit Committee (composed of
non-employee directors), oversees management's responsibilities in the
preparation of the consolidated financial statements and nominates the
independent auditors, subject to shareholder election. The Audit Committee
meets regularly with the external and internal auditors to evaluate the
effectiveness of their work in discharging their respective responsibilities
and to assure their independent and free access to the Committee.
/s/ W. Allen Doane /s/ James S. Andrasick
W. Allen Doane James S. Andrasick
President and Chief Executive Officer Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
27
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF ALEXANDER & BALDWIN, INC.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Alexander &
Baldwin, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 , and the
related consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. and
subsidiaries at December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of their operations
and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 2001 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company
adopted a new accounting standard for reporting discontinued operations in 2001
and changed its method of accounting for vessel drydocking costs in 2000.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche, LLP
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Honolulu, Hawaii
January 24, 2002
28
ALEXANDER & BALDWIN, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except per-share amounts)
Year Ended December 31,
-------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
---------- ---------- --------
Revenue:
Ocean transportation....................................................... $ 787,173 $ 839,535 $768,414
Property leasing........................................................... 70,247 61,710 53,416
Property sales............................................................. 88,911 46,158 47,894
Food products.............................................................. 105,976 102,229 113,680
Gain on sale of investments................................................ 125,478 -- --
Interest and dividends..................................................... 12,288 19,014 16,594
---------- ---------- --------
Total revenue............................................................ 1,190,073 1,068,646 999,998
---------- ---------- --------
Costs and Expenses:
Cost of transportation services............................................ 656,795 687,223 628,104
Cost of property sales and leasing services................................ 101,000 47,366 51,764
Cost of agricultural goods and services.................................... 98,718 98,820 105,052
Selling, general and administrative........................................ 99,097 88,270 86,354
Impairment loss on long-lived assets and investments....................... 28,600 -- 15,410
Interest expense........................................................... 18,658 24,252 17,774
---------- ---------- --------
Total costs and expenses................................................. 1,002,868 945,931 904,458
---------- ---------- --------
Income From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes and Cumulative
Effect of Change in Accounting Method..................................... 187,205 122,715 95,540
Income taxes............................................................... 67,392 44,391 32,961
---------- ---------- --------
Income From Continuing Operations Before Cumulative Effect of Change In
Accounting Method......................................................... 119,813 78,324 62,579
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes (See Notes 2 and 3)........... (9,185) -- --
Cumulative effect of change in accounting method, net of income taxes
(See Note 2)............................................................. -- 12,250 --
---------- ---------- --------
Net Income.................................................................. 110,628 90,574 62,579
Unrealized holding gains (losses) and reclassification of realized gains on
securities (net of income taxes of $36,371, $7,525, and $8,088).......... (61,937) 12,476 (13,868)
---------- ---------- --------
Comprehensive Income........................................................ $ 48,691 $ 103,050 $ 48,711
========== ========== ========
Basic Earnings per Share of Common Stock:
From continuing operations before cumulative effect of change in accounting $ 2.96 $ 1.92 $ 1.45
Discontinued operations.................................................... (0.23) -- --
Accounting change.......................................................... -- 0.29 --
---------- ---------- --------
Net income................................................................. $ 2.73 $ 2.21 $ 1.45
========== ========== ========
Diluted Earnings per Share of Common Stock:
From continuing operations before cumulative effect of change in accounting $ 2.94 $ 1.91 $ 1.45
Discontinued operations.................................................... (0.22) -- --
Accounting change.......................................................... -- 0.30 --
---------- ---------- --------
Net income................................................................. $ 2.72 $ 2.21 $ 1.45
========== ========== ========
Average Common Shares Outstanding........................................... 40,535 40,898 43,206
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
29
ALEXANDER & BALDWIN, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
Year Ended December 31,
------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
--------- -------- ---------
Cash Flows from Operations:
Net income................................................................ $ 110,628 $ 90,574 $ 62,579
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operations:
Depreciation and amortization........................................... 75,433 72,304 73,901
Deferred income taxes................................................... (7,389) 17,358 8,465
Gains on disposal of assets............................................. (142,567) (26,495) (13,170)
Equity in (income) loss of affiliates................................... 13,166 (6,859) (3,002)
Write-down of long-lived assets and investments......................... 44,797 -- 15,410
Change in accounting method............................................. -- (12,250) --
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts and notes receivable......................................... 2,250 (4,161) (6,007)
Inventories........................................................... 857 (1,219) (1,326)
Prepaid expenses and other assets..................................... 7,823 (7,933) (8,852)
Pension and post-retirement assets and obligations.................... (21,149) (26,169) (18,174)
Accounts and income taxes payable..................................... 62,205 9,305 10,436
Other liabilities..................................................... (2,766) 10,235 (3,408)
Real estate developments held for sale:
Cost of real estate inventory sales................................... 39,831 6,088 2,509
Expenditures for new real estate inventory............................ (32,151) (16,500) (9,982)
--------- -------- ---------
Net cash provided by operations....................................... 150,968 104,278 109,379
--------- -------- ---------
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Capital expenditures for property and developments........................ (99,183) (84,201) (68,606)
Receipts from disposal of income producing property, investments and other
assets.................................................................. 141,909 3,877 3,688
Deposits into Capital Construction Fund................................... (12,071) (12,220) (19,464)
Withdrawals from Capital Construction Fund................................ 4,217 8,574 11,458
(Increase) decrease in investments--net................................... (1,700) 894 (3,285)
--------- -------- ---------
Net cash used in investing activities................................. 33,172 (83,076) (76,209)
--------- -------- ---------
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt.................................. 6,000 98,500 39,500
Payments of long-term debt................................................ (137,000) (48,000) (30,533)
Proceeds (payments) from short-term borrowings--net....................... (3,100) 10,500 (52,000)
Repurchases of capital stock.............................................. (2,270) (48,260) (34,824)
Proceeds from issuance of capital stock................................... 4,558 2,961 101
Dividends paid............................................................ (36,488) (36,785) (38,899)
--------- -------- ---------
Net cash used in financing activities................................. (168,300) (21,084) (116,655)
--------- -------- ---------
Cash and Cash Equivalents:
Net increase (decrease) for the year...................................... 15,840 118 (83,485)
Balance, beginning of year................................................ 3,451 3,333 86,818
--------- -------- ---------
Balance, end of year...................................................... $ 19,291 $ 3,451 $ 3,333
========= ======== =========
Other Cash Flow Information:
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized................................. $ (19,546) $(24,663) $ (17,772)
Income taxes paid, net of refunds......................................... (20,961) (31,807) (34,213)
Non-cash Activities:
Tax-deferred property sales............................................... 29,963 35,569 34,883
Tax-deferred property purchases........................................... (42,257) (22,703) (34,907)
Transfer of assets to joint venture....................................... -- -- 16,438
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
30
ALEXANDER & BALDWIN, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except per-share amount)
December 31,
----------------------
2001 2000
---------- ----------
ASSETS
------
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents.......................................... $ 19,291 $ 3,451
Accounts and notes receivable, less allowances of $7,252 and $6,579 130,491 141,553
Sugar and coffee inventories....................................... 4,875 4,435
Materials and supplies inventories................................. 11,405 12,702
Real estate and other assets held for sale......................... 35,584 19,324
Deferred income taxes.............................................. 9,324 13,186
Prepaid expenses and other assets.................................. 13,044 18,736
Accrued deposits to Capital Construction Fund...................... (4,000) (4,520)
---------- ----------
Total current assets............................................. 220,014 208,867
Investments......................................................... 33,021 183,141
Real Estate Developments............................................ 47,840 62,628
Property--net....................................................... 977,048 954,692
Capital Construction Fund........................................... 158,737 150,405
Pension Assets...................................................... 63,300 50,476
Other Assets--net................................................... 44,459 55,803
---------- ----------
Total............................................................ $1,544,419 $1,666,012
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
------------------------------------
Current Liabilities
Notes payable and current portion of long-term debt................ $ 19,900 $ 30,500
Accounts payable................................................... 78,911 63,075
Payrolls and vacation due.......................................... 17,058 18,170
Uninsured claims................................................... 13,017 11,514
Income taxes payable............................................... 42,899 --
Post-retirement benefit obligations--current portion............... 2,317 2,213
Accrued and other liabilities...................................... 21,467 27,534
---------- ----------
Total current liabilities........................................ 195,569 153,006
---------- ----------
Long-term Liabilities
Long-term debt..................................................... 207,378 330,766
Deferred income taxes.............................................. 338,709 387,139
Post-retirement benefit obligations................................ 42,915 44,752
Uninsured claims and other......................................... 49,181 56,698
---------- ----------
Total long-term liabilities...................................... 638,183 819,355
---------- ----------
Commitments and Contingencies
Shareholders' Equity
Capital stock--common stock without par value; authorized,
150,000 shares ($.75 stated value per share); outstanding,
40,529 shares in 2001 and 40,353 shares in 2000.................. 33,328 33,248
Additional capital................................................. 66,659 58,007
Unrealized holding gains on securities............................. -- 61,937
Retained earnings.................................................. 622,615 552,637
Cost of treasury stock............................................. (11,935) (12,178)
---------- ----------
Total shareholders' equity....................................... 710,667 693,651
---------- ----------
Total............................................................ $1,544,419 $1,666,012
========== ==========
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
31
ALEXANDER & BALDWIN, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
For the three years ended December 31, 2001
(In thousands, except per-share amounts)
Capital Stock
--------------------------------
Issued In Treasury
--------------- --------------- Unrealized
Stated Additional Holding Retained
Shares Value Shares Cost Capital Gains Earnings
------ ------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- --------
Balance, December 31, 1998............. 48,132 $36,098 4,104 $(12,551) $51,946 $ 63,329 $555,820
Shares repurchased..................... (1,565) (1,173) -- -- -- -- (33,651)
Stock options exercised................ 5 4 -- -- 97 -- --
Issued--incentive plans................ 7 4 (51) 147 1,081 -- --
Unrealized holding loss................ -- -- -- -- -- (13,868) --
Net income............................. -- -- -- -- -- -- 62,579
Cash dividends......................... -- -- -- -- -- -- (38,899)
------ ------- ----- -------- ------- -------- --------
Balance, December 31, 1999............. 46,579 34,933 4,053 (12,404) 53,124 49,461 545,849
Shares repurchased..................... (2,378) (1,783) -- -- -- -- (46,477)
Stock options exercised................ 126 94 -- -- 3,378 -- (524)
Issued--incentive plans................ 4 4 (75) 226 1,505 -- --
Unrealized holding gain................ -- -- -- -- -- 12,476 --
Net income............................. -- -- -- -- -- -- 90,574
Cash dividends......................... -- -- -- -- -- (36,785)
------ ------- ----- -------- ------- -------- --------
Balance, December 31, 2000............. 44,331 33,248 3,978 (12,178) 58,007 61,937 552,637
Shares repurchased..................... (105) (79) -- -- -- -- (2,192)
Stock options exercised--net........... 207 155 -- -- 6,908 -- (1,970)
Issued--incentive plans................ 4 4 (70) 243 1,744 -- --
Reversal of holding gains/1/........... -- -- -- -- -- (61,937) --
Net income............................. -- -- -- -- -- -- 110,628
Cash dividends......................... -- -- -- -- -- -- (36,488)
------ ------- ----- -------- ------- -------- --------
Balance, December 31, 2001............. 44,437 $33,328 3,908 $(11,935) $66,659 $ -- $622,615
====== ======= ===== ======== ======= ======== ========
/1/ See Note 5 for discussion of marketable equity securities sold during 2001.
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
32
ALEXANDER & BALDWIN, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include
the accounts of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. and all wholly owned subsidiaries
("Company"), after elimination of significant intercompany amounts. Significant
investments in businesses, partnerships and joint ventures in which the Company
does not have control are accounted for under the equity method. Generally,
these are investments in businesses in which the Company's ownership is between
20 and 50 percent.
Segment Information: The Company has three operating segments: Ocean
Transportation, Property Development and Management, and Food Products. The
Company reports segment information in the same way that management assesses
segment performance. Additional information regarding these segments is found
in Note 14.
Cash and Cash Equivalents: Cash equivalents are composed of all highly
liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less and which
have no significant risk of change in value.
Inventories: Raw sugar and coffee inventories are stated at the lower of
cost (first-in, first-out basis) or market. Other inventories, composed
principally of materials and supplies, are stated at the lower of cost
(principally average cost) or market. Materials and supplies inventories are
carried at historical cost, which is not greater than replacement cost.
Property: Property is stated at cost. Expenditures for major renewals and
betterments are capitalized. Replacements, maintenance and repairs that do not
improve or extend asset lives are charged to expense as incurred. Gains or
losses from property disposals are included in the determination of net income.
As discussed in Note 2, the Company changed its accounting for drydocking costs
in 2000. Costs of regularly scheduled drydocking of vessels and planned major
vessel repairs performed during drydocking are capitalized and amortized over
the periods benefited.
Coffee Orchards: Costs of developing coffee orchards are capitalized during
the development period and depreciated over the estimated productive lives. In
1999, following the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived
Assets to Be Disposed Of," the Company reduced the carrying value of its coffee
orchards and field and factory processing equipment. This is described further
in Note 4.
Capitalized Interest: Interest costs incurred in connection with
significant expenditures for real estate developments or the construction of
assets are capitalized. Interest expense is shown net of capitalized interest
on the Statements of Income, because the amounts are not significant.
Construction Expenditures: Expenditures for real estate developments are
capitalized during construction and are classified as Real Estate Developments
on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. When construction is complete, the costs
are reclassified as either Real Estate Held for Sale or Property, based upon
the Company's intent to sell the completed asset or to hold it as an
investment. Cash flows related to real estate developments are classified as
either operating or investing activities, based upon the Company's intention to
sell the property or to retain ownership of the property as an investment
following completion of construction.
Depreciation: Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method.
Estimated useful lives of property are as follows:
Classification Range of Life (in years)
-------------- ------------------------
Buildings................ 10 to 50
Vessels.................. 10 to 40
Marine containers........ 2 to 25
Terminal facilities...... 3 to 35
Machinery and equipment.. 3 to 35
Utility systems and other 5 to 60
33
Fair Value of Financial Instruments: The fair values of cash and cash
equivalents, receivables and short-term and long-term borrowings approximate
their carrying values.
Fair Value of Real-Estate Assets: Real estate is carried at the lower of
cost or fair value. Fair values generally are determined using the expected
market value for the property, less sales costs. For residential units and lots
held for sale, market value is determined by reference to the sales of similar
property, market studies, tax assessments and cash flows. For commercial
property, market value is determined using recent comparable sales, tax
assessments and cash flows. A large portion of the Company's real estate is
undeveloped land located in Hawaii on the Islands of Maui and Kauai. This land
has a cost basis that averages approximately $150 per acre, a value much lower
than fair value.
Impairments of Long-lived Assets: Long-lived assets are reviewed for
possible impairment when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying
value may not be recoverable. In such evaluation, the estimated future
undiscounted cash flows generated by the asset are compared with the amount
recorded for the asset to determine if a write-down may be required. If this
review determines that the recorded value will not be recovered, the amount
recorded for the asset is reduced to estimated fair value. (See Note 4.)
Voyage Revenue Recognition: Voyage revenue and variable costs and expenses
associated with voyages are included in income at the time each voyage leg
commences. This method of accounting does not differ materially from other
acceptable accounting methods. Freight rates are provided in tariffs filed with
the Surface Transportation Board of the U.S. Department of Transportation.
Real Estate Sales Revenue Recognition: Sales are recorded when the risks
and benefits of ownership have passed to the buyers (generally on closing
dates), adequate down payments have been received, and collection of remaining
balances is reasonably assured.
Sugar and Coffee Revenue Recognition: Revenue from bulk raw sugar sales is
recorded when delivered to the cooperative of Hawaiian producers based on the
estimated net return to producers in accordance with contractual agreements.
Revenue from coffee is recorded when the title to the product and risk of loss
passes to third parties (generally this occurs when the product is shipped or
delivered to customers) and when collection is reasonably assured.
Non-voyage Ocean Transportation Costs: Vessel depreciation, charter hire,
terminal operating overhead and general and administrative expenses are charged
to expense as incurred.
Agricultural Costs: Costs of growing and harvesting sugar cane are charged
to the cost of production in the year incurred and to cost of sales as raw
sugar is delivered to the cooperative of Hawaiian producers as allowed in
Statement of Position No. 85-3. Costs of growing coffee are charged to
inventory in the year incurred and to cost of sales as coffee is sold.
Employee Benefit Plans: Certain ocean transportation subsidiaries are
members of the Pacific Maritime Association (PMA) and the Hawaii Stevedoring
Industry Committee, which negotiate multi-employer pension plans covering
certain shoreside bargaining unit personnel. The subsidiaries directly
negotiate multi-employer pension plans covering other bargaining unit
personnel. Pension costs are accrued in accordance with contribution rates
established by the PMA, the parties to a plan or the trustees of a plan.
Several trusteed, noncontributory, single-employer defined benefit plans and
defined contribution plans cover substantially all other employees.
Stock-based Compensation: As allowed by Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," the
Company has elected to continue to apply the provisions of Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," as
discussed in Note 12.
Income Taxes: Deferred tax assets and liabilities are established for
temporary differences between the way certain income and expense items are
reported for financial reporting and tax purposes. Deferred tax assets and
34
liabilities are adjusted to the extent necessary to reflect tax rates expected
to be in effect when the temporary differences reverse. A valuation allowance
is established for deferred tax assets for which realization is not likely.
Basic and Diluted Earnings per Share of Common Stock: Basic Earnings per
Share is determined by dividing Net Income by the weighted-average common
shares outstanding during the year. The calculation of Diluted Earnings per
Share includes the effect of unexercised options to purchase the Company's
stock.
Comprehensive Income: Comprehensive Income includes changes from either
recognized transactions or other economic events, excluding capital stock
transactions, which impact Shareholders' Equity. For the Company, the only
difference between Net Income and Comprehensive Income is the unrealized
holding gains on securities available for sale. Comprehensive Income is not
used in the calculation of Earnings per Share. (See Note 5 for a discussion of
the liquidation of marketable equity securities.)
Environmental Costs: Environmental expenditures that relate to current
operations are expensed or capitalized, as appropriate. Expenditures that
relate to an existing condition caused by past operations or events, and which
do not contribute to current or future revenue generation, are charged to
expense. Liabilities are recorded when environmental assessments or remedial
efforts are probable and the costs can be estimated reasonably.
Use of Estimates: The preparation of the consolidated financial statements
in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Future actual amounts
could differ from those estimates.
Impact of Newly Issued Accounting Standards: On January 1, 2001, the
Company adopted SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities," as amended, which establishes the accounting and reporting
standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities. The adoption of
this standard did not have a material effect on the consolidated financial
statements.
In 2000, the Company adopted SFAS No. 140, "Accounting for Transfers and
Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities." SFAS No. 140
provides standards for transfers and servicing of financial assets and
extinguishments of liabilities using a financial-components approach that
focuses on control. The adoption of this standard did not have a material
effect on the consolidated financial statements.
SFAS No. 141 "Business Combinations" was issued in June 2001 and became
effective in July 2001. This statement requires the purchase method of
accounting for business combinations. This standard will affect how the Company
accounts for new business combinations, but the adoption of the standard in
2001 had no effect on the Company's current year's consolidated financial
statements.
SFAS No. 142 "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" was issued in June 2001
and is effective in January 2002. This statement addresses how intangible
assets, including goodwill, should be accounted for in the consolidated
financial statements. The new statement, which will be adopted by the Company
in January, 2002, will not have a material effect on the consolidated financial
statements.
SFAS No. 143 "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations" was issued in
June 2001 and becomes effective in January 2003. This statement addresses
accounting and reporting for obligations and costs which will occur when
long-term assets are retired. Among other things, the statement requires that
the present value of the liability associated with future asset retirements be
recorded on the balance sheet when an obligation has been incurred and when it
can be measured. The amortization of the capitalized cost and increases in the
present value of the obligation which result from the passage of time, are
recorded as charges to earnings. The possible financial impacts of this
standard, when it is adopted by the Company in January 2003, are not yet known,
but are being assessed.
Reclassifications: Certain amounts in the 2000 and 1999 consolidated
financial statements have been reclassified to conform with the 2001
presentation.
35
2. CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING METHODS
2001--Adoption of New Accounting Standard for Reporting Discontinued
Operations: SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets" was issued in August 2001 and becomes effective in January
2002. However, as permitted by the standard, the Company adopted SFAS No. 144
effective January 1, 2001. This statement replaces previous accounting
standards related to asset impairments and provides guidance concerning the
recognition and measurement of impairment losses for certain types of long-term
assets. The statement recommends the use of probability-weighted cash flow
estimations, precludes accruing future operating losses prior to asset
disposal, expands the scope of "discontinued operations" to include a component
of an entity, and eliminates the current exemption to consolidation when
control over a subsidiary is likely to be temporary. The statement changes how
the Company analyzes and accounts for asset impairments and discontinued
operations, but, upon adoption, it had no immediate financial impacts. During
the fourth quarter of 2001, the Company recorded a loss from the abandonment of
its panelboard manufacturing facility, which it classified as Discontinued
Operations. This is described in Note 3 to the consolidated financial
statements.
2000--Change in Accounting Method for Vessel Drydocking Costs: The Company
changed its method of accounting for vessel drydocking costs, as of January 1,
2000, from the accrual method to the deferral method. Drydocking costs had been
accrued as a liability and an expense on an estimated basis, in advance of the
next scheduled drydocking. Subsequent payments for drydocking were charged
against the accrued liability. Under the deferral method, actual drydocking
costs are capitalized when incurred and amortized over the period benefited;
generally, this is the period between scheduled drydockings. This method
eliminates the uncertainty of estimating these costs. This change was made to
conform with prevailing industry accounting practices. The cumulative effect of
this accounting change, as of January 1, 2000, is shown separately in the
Consolidated Statements of Income and increased net income by $12,250,000 (net
of income tax expense of $7,668,000), or $0.29 per basic share.
The effect of this change in accounting method on the balance sheets, as of
December 31, 2000, was to increase other assets by $4,765,000, eliminate
drydocking reserves of $15,153,000, increase deferred taxes by $7,668,000, and
increase shareholders' equity by $12,250,000. Had this change been applied
retroactively, the impact on net income for 1999 would not have been materially
different from reported net income.
2000--Change in Accounting for Certain Revenues and Expenses: The Company
changed its method of presentation for certain freight services that are
performed by third parties and billed by the Company to its customers. The
expenses and related revenue for these services previously were reported on a
net basis and were not reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Accordingly, operating revenue and expenses for 2000 and 1999 were increased by
$38,059,000 and $31,874,000, respectively. For 2001, the amount billed for
these services was approximately $32,764,000.
The Company also changed its method of presentation for common area
maintenance (CAM) costs. These costs, which are incurred by the Company but
which are charged to tenants under various lease arrangements, previously were
netted against Property Leasing Revenue. The Company now records CAM amounts in
Costs of Leasing Services in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Accordingly, Property Leasing Revenue and Costs of Leasing Services for 2000
and 1999 were increased by $11,246,000 and $8,852,000, respectively. For 2001,
the CAM costs totaled $12,207,000.
These two changes were in response to the Securities and Exchange
Commission's Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, "Revenue Recognition in
Financial Statements," which provides guidance about the classification, on a
gross basis, of revenues and expenses. These changes had no effect on earnings
or segment operating profit.
3. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
The Company ceased the operations of and abandoned its panelboard
manufacturing business operated by Hawaiian DuraGreen, Inc., a wholly-owned
subsidiary ("DuraGreen"). This subsidiary constructed a production
36
facility during 1999 and 2000 with an initial capital investment of
approximately $12,500,000. DuraGreen produced a panelboard product using
bagasse, a byproduct in the production of raw cane-sugar, for use in various
furniture and construction applications. After nearly a year of production
issues, poor operating results and weaknesses in the panelboard market,
management determined that the Company's investment in the business will not be
recovered and profitability could not be achieved. The 2001 loss from
Discontinued Operations includes operating losses and closure costs of
$2,964,000 and a $11,387,000 write-down of the production assets to their
estimated salvage value, net of a total income tax benefit of approximately
$5,166,000. There were no operations in prior years. The Consolidated Balance
Sheet at December 31, 2000 included assets of $11,616,000 for DuraGreen. This
amount principally was machinery and equipment.
4. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS AND INVESTMENTS
2001--As described in Note 5, the Company holds common and preferred stock
holdings in C&H Sugar Company, Inc. ("C&H"). As a result of operating losses
and declining cash flows at C&H, combined with adverse market changes, the
Company concluded that C&H's estimated future earnings and cash flows would not
allow recovery of the carrying value of the Company's investments. This loss in
value was considered an "other than temporary" impairment condition;
accordingly, the carrying values of the investments were written down by
$28,600,000 during the fourth quarter of 2001. The loss includes a write-down
of the common stock and junior preferred stock values to zero, and a write-down
of the senior preferred stock to approximately $11,500,000. The amount of the
write-down was based on the valuation of the common, and junior and senior
preferred stocks, as conducted by an independent valuation firm. Accepted
valuation practices were utilized in determining these investments' fair
values, including the market and income approaches, discounted cash flow
method, and market yield analysis. The valuation considered the Company's
minority position, the illiquidity of these types of investments in the public
market, the ability of future cash flows to fund future debt and preferred
obligations, and sugar industry conditions. The Company has no current plans to
divest or sell its investments in C&H.
2001--The Company wrote off $4,823,000 for power generation equipment that
is being removed from service. This equipment was no longer needed in the
Company's cane sugar refining operations on Maui, due to changes in factory and
power generation processes.
1999--The Company began growing coffee in Hawaii in 1987 as an alternative
crop to sugar cane. Since inception, the Company's coffee operation generated
operating losses and negative cash flows. During the second half of 1999, the
Company significantly reduced the coffee workforce and changed its coffee
marketing and selling plans. To exacerbate the problem, coffee commodity prices
dropped significantly in 1999, due to an oversupply of coffee in the
marketplace. Because of continuing cash-flow losses, the ongoing viability of
the coffee operation was evaluated again. As a result, the Company determined
that the estimated future cash flows of the coffee operation were less than the
carrying value of its productive assets, consisting mainly of orchards and
field and processing equipment. Accordingly, a $15,410,000 (pre-tax) charge was
recorded to write down these productive assets to their fair value (i.e.,
present value of estimated future cash flows).
37
5. INVESTMENTS
At December 31, 2001 and 2000, investments consisted principally of
marketable equity securities, equity in affiliated companies, limited
partnership interests and purchase-money mortgages, as follows:
2001 2000
------- --------
(in thousands)
Equity in Affiliated Companies:
SSA Terminals, LLC (SSAT).................................... $16,033 $ 21,867
C&H Sugar Company, Inc. (C&H)................................ 11,504 41,705
Sea Star Line, LLC (Sea Star)................................ 1,854 7,586
Other........................................................ 300 300
Marketable Equity Securities..................................... -- 108,069
Limited Partnership Interests, Purchase-money Mortgages and Other 3,330 3,614
------- --------
Total Investments................................................ $33,021 $183,141
======= ========
Marketable Equity Securities: The marketable equity securities are
classified as "available for sale" and are stated at quoted market values as
traded on national exchanges. The unrealized holding gains on these securities
and the reclassification of gains previously included in Comprehensive Income,
net of deferred income taxes, have been recorded as a separate component of
Shareholders' Equity and are included in Comprehensive Income.
In May, 2001, BNP Paribas SA, France's largest bank, announced that, subject
to regulatory, shareholder and other approvals, it would purchase the remaining
55 percent of BancWest Corporation ("BancWest") which it did not already own
for $35 per share. This offer was 40% higher than the market price of
BancWest's stock at the time of the offer. When the offer was made, the Company
owned 3,385,788 shares of BancWest. The transaction closed during the fourth
quarter of 2001. As a result of the sale, the Company received cash of
$118,503,000, recorded a pre-tax gain of $110,338,000, and recognized an
after-tax gain of approximately $68,410,000 ($1.69 per basic share.)
During 2001, the Company also divested its holdings in Pacific Century
Financial Corporation ("Pacific Century"). This was completed through the
donation of 360,000 shares to the Company's charitable foundation and the sales
of 749,000 shares of the stock. The fair value of the donated stock was
approximately $7,500,000 and the historical cost basis was approximately
$500,000. The net expense related to this contribution was $500,000 and is
included in "Selling general and administrative expenses" in the 2001
consolidated financial statements. The Company received $16,219,000 for the
sales of the shares, recognized a pre-tax gain of $15,140,000 and recorded an
after-tax gain of $9,378,000 ($0.23 per basic share).
The changes in the net unrealized holding gains (losses) for the three years
ended December 31, 2001 were as follows:
2001 2000 1999
-------- ------- --------
(in thousands)
Holding gains (losses) arising during year,
net of deferred income tax.................. $ 15,851 $12,476 $(13,868)
Reclassification of gains previously included
in Comprehensive Income, net of income tax.. (77,788) -- --
-------- ------- --------
Total........................................ $(61,937) $12,476 $(13,868)
======== ======= ========
As described above, the marketable equity investments were divested during
2001. Accordingly there was no balance in unrealized holdings at year-end 2001.
The components of the net unrealized holding gains, as noted on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2000, were as follows:
2000
--------------
(in thousands)
Market value................ $108,069
Less historical cost........ 9,761
--------
Unrealized holding gains.... 98,308
Less deferred income taxes.. 36,371
--------
Net unrealized holding gains $ 61,937
========
38
Equity in Affiliated Companies: In 1998, the Company sold a majority
interest in C&H. Following the sale, the Company retained approximately 36
percent of the common stock, 40 percent of the junior preferred stock and all
of the senior preferred stock of C&H. Dividends on the senior and junior
preferred stocks are cumulative. Through December 2003, dividends on the senior
preferred stock may be paid either in cash or by issuance of additional shares
of senior preferred stock. C&H must redeem from the Company, at one thousand
dollars per share, the outstanding senior preferred stock in December 2009 and
outstanding junior preferred stock in December 2010. C&H was included in the
consolidated results of the Company up to the date of the sale. The Company
accounts for its investment in C&H under the equity method. See Note 4 for a
discussion of the 2001 impairment loss related to this investment which
resulted from an other than temporary decline in value. Financial information
for C&H as of and for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 follows:
Condensed Balance Sheets
2001 2000
-------- --------
(in thousands)
Assets:
Current......................................... $103,699 $125,735
Property and other.............................. 116,293 129,529
-------- --------
Total............................................. $219,992 $255,264
======== ========
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity:
Current......................................... $ 35,030 $ 63,470
Long-term debt and other........................ 139,737 124,941
Shareholders' equity, including preferred stock. 45,225 66,853
-------- --------
Total............................................. $219,992 $255,264
======== ========
Condensed Statements of Income
2001 2000
-------- --------
(in thousands)
Revenue........... $427,350 $413,153
Cost and Expenses. 433,864 409,839
-------- --------
Net (Loss) Income. $ (6,514) $ 3,314
======== ========
Matson, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, has a minority interest
investment in a limited liability corporation (LLC) with Saltchuk Resources,
Inc. and International Shipping Agency, Inc., named Sea Star Line, LLC, which
operates an ocean transportation service between Florida and Puerto Rico.
Matson has guaranteed obligations of $31,500,000 of this unconsolidated
affiliate and chartered two vessels to Sea Star Line, LLC. Subsequent to 2001
year-end, Matson sold the two vessels to Sea Star for an aggregate sales price
of $17,000,000, which was the approximate carrying value of the vessels at 2001
year end. This amount is included in "Real estate and other assets held for
sale" on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2001. This investment
represents a minority interest and is accounted for under the equity method.
Matson is part owner of an LLC with Stevedoring Services of America, named
SSA Terminals, LLC, which provides stevedoring and terminal services at six
terminals in three West Coast ports to the Company and other shipping lines.
This investment represents a minority interest and is accounted for under the
equity method. During 1999, Matson contributed assets with a value of
$16,438,000 in connection with the formation of SSAT. The "Cost of
transportation services" included approximately $89,551,000, $99,151,000 and
$46,856,000, for 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively, paid to this unconsolidated
affiliate for terminal services.
The Company's equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates for the
three years ended December 31, 2001 was $(8,778,000), $6,859,000, and
$3,002,000, respectively.
Limited Partnership Interests and Purchase-money Mortgages: The investments
in limited partnerships are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value and
purchase-money mortgages are recorded at cost. The purchase-money mortgages are
intended to be held to maturity. The values of the investments in limited
partnerships are assessed annually.
39
See Note 7 for a discussion of fair values of investments in the Capital
Construction Fund.
6. PROPERTY
Property on the Consolidated Balance Sheets includes the following:
2001 2000
---------- ----------
(in thousands)
Vessels....................................... $ 694,618 $ 770,352
Machinery and equipment....................... 545,298 534,894
Buildings..................................... 317,068 271,314
Land.......................................... 104,135 95,195
Water, power and sewer systems................ 87,915 80,084
Other property improvements................... 67,645 56,355
---------- ----------
Total..................................... 1,816,679 1,808,194
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization 839,631 853,502
---------- ----------
Property--net............................. $ 977,048 $ 954,692
========== ==========
7. CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUND
Matson is party to an agreement with the United States government which
established a Capital Construction Fund (CCF) under provisions of the Merchant
Marine Act, 1936, as amended. The agreement has program objectives for the
acquisition, construction or reconstruction of vessels and for repayment of
existing vessel indebtedness. Deposits to the CCF are limited by certain
applicable earnings. Such deposits are federal income tax deductions in the
year made; however, they are taxable, with interest payable from the year of
deposit, if withdrawn for general corporate purposes or other non-qualified
purposes, or upon termination of the agreement. Qualified withdrawals for
investment in vessels and certain related equipment do not give rise to a
current tax liability, but reduce the depreciable bases of the vessels or other
assets for income tax purposes.
Amounts deposited into the CCF are a preference item for calculating federal
alternative minimum taxable income. Deposits not committed for qualified
purposes within 25 years from the date of deposit, will be treated as
non-qualified withdrawals over the subsequent five years. As of December 31,
2001, the oldest CCF deposits date from 1994. Management believes that all
amounts on deposit in the CCF at the end of 2001 will be used or committed for
qualified purposes prior to the expiration of the applicable 25-year periods.
Under the terms of the CCF agreement, Matson may designate certain qualified
earnings as "accrued deposits" or may designate, as obligations of the CCF,
qualified withdrawals to reimburse qualified expenditures initially made with
operating funds. Such accrued deposits to and withdrawals from the CCF are
reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets either as obligations of the
Company's current assets or as receivables from the CCF.
The Company has classified its investments in the CCF as "held-to-maturity"
and, accordingly, has not reflected temporary unrealized market gains and
losses on the Consolidated Balance Sheets or Consolidated Statements of
Income. The long-term nature of the CCF program supports the Company's
intention to hold these investments to maturity.
40
At December 31, 2001 and 2000, the balances on deposit in the CCF are
summarized as follows:
2001 2000
----------------------------- -----------------------------
(in thousands)
Amortized Fair Unrealized Amortized Fair Unrealized
Cost Value Gain Cost Value Gain (Loss)
--------- -------- ---------- --------- -------- -----------
Mortgage-backed securities $ 26,180 $ 26,983 $ 803 $ 32,302 $ 32,281 $(21)
Cash and cash equivalents. 128,557 129,161 604 113,583 113,871 288
Accrued deposits.......... 4,000 4,000 -- 4,520 4,520 --
-------- -------- ------ -------- -------- ----
Total..................... $158,737 $160,144 $1,407 $150,405 $150,672 $267
======== ======== ====== ======== ======== ====
Fair value of the mortgage-backed securities was determined by an outside
investment management company, based on experience trading identical or
substantially similar securities. No central exchange exists for these
securities; they are traded over-the-counter. The Company earned $2,476,000 in
2001, $2,654,000 in 2000, and $3,152,000 in 1999 on its investments in
mortgage-backed securities. The fair values of other CCF investments are based
on quoted market prices. These other investments mature no later than January
9, 2004. One security classified as "held to maturity" was sold during 2001 for
a loss of $42,800. In 2000, three securities classified as "held-to-maturity"
were sold for a combined loss of $48,400. These securities no longer met
authorized credit requirements.
8. NOTES PAYABLE AND LONG-TERM DEBT
At December 31, 2001 and 2000, long-term debt consisted of the following:
2001 2000
-------- --------
(in thousands)
Commercial paper, 2001 high 6.79%, low 1.88%........................ $ 99,878 $ 99,766
Bank variable rate loans, due after 2001, 2001 high 7.13%, low 2.17% 17,400 136,500
Term loans:
7.38%, payable through 2007....................................... 45,000 52,500
7.42%, payable through 2010....................................... 20,000 20,000
7.43%, payable through 2007....................................... 15,000 15,000
7.57%, payable through 2009....................................... 15,000 15,000
7.55%, payable through 2009....................................... 15,000 15,000
7.65%, payable through 2001....................................... -- 7,500
-------- --------
Total............................................................... 227,278 361,266
Less current portion................................................ 19,900 30,500
-------- --------
Long-term debt...................................................... $207,378 $330,766
======== ========
Commercial Paper: At December 31, 2001, $99,878,000 of commercial paper
notes was outstanding under a commercial paper program used by a subsidiary to
finance the construction of a vessel. Maturities ranged from 6 to 56 days. The
borrowings outstanding under this program are classified as long-term because
the subsidiary intends to continue the program and, eventually, to repay the
borrowings with qualified withdrawals from the Capital Construction Fund.
Variable Rate Loans: The Company has a revolving credit and term loan
agreement with six commercial banks, whereby it may borrow up to $185,000,000
under revolving loans through November 2004, at market rates of interest. Any
revolving loan outstanding on that date may be converted into a term loan,
which would be payable in four equal quarterly installments. The agreement
contains certain restrictive covenants, the most significant of which requires
the maintenance of an interest coverage ratio of 2:1 and total debt to earnings
before interest, depreciation,
amortization and taxes of 3:1. At December 31, 2000, $113,500,000 was
outstanding under this agreement. No amount was drawn on this facility at
December 31, 2001.
The Company has an uncommitted $70,000,000 short-term revolving credit
agreement with a commercial bank. The agreement extends through November 2002,
but may be canceled by the bank or the Company at any time. The
41
amount which the Company may draw under the facility is reduced by the amount
drawn against the bank under the previously referenced $185,000,000 multi-bank
facility, in which it is a participant, and by letters of credit issued under
the $70,000,000 uncommitted facility. At December 31, 2001 and 2000, $5,000,000
and $7,500,000, respectively, were outstanding under this agreement. Under the
borrowing formula for this facility, the Company could have borrowed an
additional $59,477,000 at December 31, 2001.
Matson has two revolving credit agreements totaling $90,000,000 with
commercial banks. The first facility is a $50,000,000 two-year revolving credit
agreement which expires in September 2003. At December 31, 2001, no amounts
were drawn on this facility. At December 31, 2000, $15,500,000 was outstanding.
The second facility is a two-year $40,000,000 revolving credit agreement which
was entered into during 2001 and which expires in January 2003. At December 31,
2001, $12,400,000 was drawn on this new facility.
Matson also has a $25,000,000 one-year revolving credit agreement with a
commercial bank, expiring in November 2002, which serves as a commercial paper
liquidity back-up line. At December 31, 2001 and 2000, no amounts were
outstanding under this agreement.
Other Debt Agreements: During 2001, the Company completed a private shelf
agreement for $50,000,000, which expires in April 2004. At December 31, 2001,
no amount had been drawn on this facility. Also in 2001, Matson entered into a
$50,000,000 private shelf offering which expires in June 2004. No amounts were
drawn on that facility at year end. An uncommitted $25,000,000 revolving credit
agreement with a commercial bank expired in May 2001.
Long-term Debt Maturities: At December 31, 2001, maturities and planned
prepayments of all long-term debt during the next five years are $19,900,000
for 2002, $9,643,000 for 2003, $12,500,000 for 2004, $17,500,000 for 2005 and
$17,500,000 for 2006.
Interest Rate Risk: The Company is exposed to changes in U.S. interest
rates, primarily as a result of its borrowing and investing activities used to
maintain liquidity and to fund business operations. In order to manage its
exposure to changes in interest rates, the Company utilizes a balanced mix of
debt maturities, along with both fixed-rate and variable-rate debt. The Company
does not hedge its interest rate exposure. The nature and amount of the
Company's long-term and short-term debt can be expected to fluctuate as a
result of future business requirements, market conditions and other factors.
The following table summarizes the Company's debt obligations at December 31,
2001, presenting principal cash flows and related interest rates by expected
fiscal year of maturity. Variable interest rates represent the weighted-average
rates of the portfolio at December 31, 2001. The Company estimates that the
carrying value of its debt is not materially different from its fair value.
Expected Fiscal Year of Maturity at December 31, 2001
---------------------------------------------------------------
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Thereafter Total
------- ------ ------- ------- ------- ---------- --------
(dollars in thousands)
Fixed rate........... $ 7,500 $9,643 $12,500 $17,500 $17,500 $ 45,357 $110,000
Average interest rate 7.17% 7.33% 7.38% 7.42% 7.45% 7.49% --
Variable rate........ $12,400 -- -- -- -- $104,878 $117,278
Average interest rate 2.20% -- -- -- -- 2.04% --
9. LEASES
The Company as Lessee: Principal operating leases include land, office and
terminal facilities, containers and equipment, leased for periods which expire
between 2003 and 2052. Management expects that, in the normal course of
business, most operating leases will be renewed or replaced by other similar
leases.
Rental expense under operating leases totaled $19,748,000, $19,741,000, and
$28,343,000 for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively.
42
Future minimum payments under operating leases as of December 31, 2001 were
as follows:
Operating
Leases
--------------
(in thousands)
2002........................ $ 12,843
2003........................ 12,699
2004........................ 12,556
2005........................ 8,848
2006........................ 7,814
Thereafter.................. 91,761
--------
Total minimum lease payments $146,521
========
The Company is obligated to pay terminal facility rent equal to the
principal and interest on Special Facility Revenue Bonds issued by the
Department of Transportation of the State of Hawaii. Interest on the bonds is
payable semi-annually and principal, in the amount of $16,500,000, is due in
2013. An accrued liability of $10,431,000 and $9,887,000 at December 31, 2001
and 2000, respectively, included in other long-term liabilities, provides for a
pro-rata portion of the principal due on these bonds.
The Company as Lessor: The Company leases land, buildings, land
improvements, and five vessels under operating leases. Two of the vessels were
chartered to an unconsolidated affiliate and were sold to that affiliate in
January 2002 (see Note 5). The historical cost of and accumulated depreciation
on leased property at December 31, 2001 and 2000 were as follows:
2001 2000
-------- --------
(in thousands)
Leased property..................... $653,200 $621,860
Less accumulated amortization....... 173,269 154,467
-------- --------
Property under operating leases--net $479,931 $467,393
======== ========
Total rental income under these operating leases for the three years ended
December 31, 2001 was as follows:
2001 2000 1999
-------- -------- -------
(in thousands)
Minimum rentals........................... $105,251 $ 98,607 $93,275
Contingent rentals (based on sales volume) 2,481 1,917 1,244
-------- -------- -------
Total..................................... $107,732 $100,524 $94,519
======== ======== =======
Future minimum rental income on non-cancelable leases at December 31, 2001
was as follows:
Operating
Leases
--------------
(in thousands)
2002...... $ 96,807
2003...... 90,028
2004...... 81,757
2005...... 75,112
2006...... 26,586
Thereafter 151,375
--------
Total..... $521,665
========
43
10. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
The Company has funded single-employer defined benefit pension plans which
cover substantially all non-bargaining unit employees.
In addition, the Company has plans that provide certain retiree health care
and life insurance benefits to substantially all salaried and to certain hourly
employees. Employees are generally eligible for such benefits upon retirement
and completion of a specified number of years of credited service. The Company
does not pre-fund these benefits and has the right to modify or terminate
certain of these plans in the future. Certain groups of retirees pay a portion
of the benefit costs.
The status of the funded defined benefit pension plans and the unfunded
accumulated post-retirement benefit plans, at December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999
is shown in the table on page 46.
The net periodic benefit cost for the defined benefit pension plans and the
post-retirement health care and life insurance benefit plans during 2001, 2000,
and 1999 is summarized in the table on page 46.
The assumptions used to determine the benefit information were as follows:
Other Post-retirement
Pension Benefits Benefits
---------------- ---------------------
2001 2000 1999 2001 2000 1999
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
Discount rate................. 7.25% 7.75% 7.75% 7.25% 7.75% 7.75%
Expected return on plan assets 9.00% 9.00% 9.00% -- -- --
Rate of compensation increase. 4.25% 4.25% 4.25% 4.25% 4.25% 4.25%
For the 2001 post-retirement benefit measurement purposes, a ten percent
annual rate of increase in the per capita cost of covered health care benefits
was assumed through 2001. The rate was assumed to decrease by one percent per
year through 2005 and then remain at five percent thereafter. For the 2000
measurement purposes, a ten percent annual rate of increase was assumed through
2001, after which a constant five percent rate was assumed. Unrecognized gains
and losses of the post-retirement benefit plans are amortized over five years.
If the assumed health care cost trend rate were increased or decreased by
one percentage point, the accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation, as of
December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999 and the net periodic post-retirement benefit
cost for 2001, 2000 and 1999, would have increased or decreased as follows:
Other Post-retirement Benefits
One Percentage Point
----------------------------------------------
Increase Decrease
-------------------- -------------------------
2001 2000 1999 2001 2000 1999
------ ------ ------ ------- ------- -------
(in thousands)
Effect on total of service and interest cost components $ 296 $ 196 $ 416 $ (244) $ (226) $ (347)
Effect on post-retirement benefit obligation........... $3,856 $1,664 $4,062 $(3,199) $(2,278) $(3,388)
The assets of the defined benefit pension plans consist principally of
listed stocks and bonds. Contributions are determined annually for each plan by
the Company's pension administrative committee, based upon the actuarially
determined minimum required contribution under the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), as amended, and the maximum deductible
contribution allowed for tax purposes. For the plans covering employees who are
members of collective bargaining units, the benefit formulas are determined
according to the collective bargaining agreements, either using career average
pay as the base or a flat dollar amount per year of service. The benefit
formulas for the remaining defined benefit plans are based on final average pay.
The Company has non-qualified supplemental pension plans covering certain
employees and retirees, which provide for incremental pension payments from the
Company's general funds, so that total pension benefits would be substantially
equal to amounts that would have been payable from the Company's qualified
pension plans if it were
44
not for limitations imposed by income tax regulations. The obligation, included
with other non-current liabilities, relating to these unfunded plans, totaled
$13,807,000 and $12,597,000 at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
Total contributions to the multi-employer pension plans covering personnel
in shoreside and seagoing bargaining units were $4,028,000 in 2001, $3,027,000
in 2000, and $4,367,000 in 1999. Union collective bargaining agreements provide
that total employer contributions during the terms of the agreements must be
sufficient to meet the normal costs and amortization payments required to be
funded during those periods. Contributions are generally based on union labor
paid or cargo volume. A portion of such contributions is for unfunded accrued
actuarial liabilities of the plans being funded over periods of 25 to 40 years,
which began between 1967 and 1976.
The multi-employer plans are subject to the plan termination insurance
provisions of ERISA and are paying premiums to the Pension Benefit Guarantee
Corporation (PBGC). The statutes provide that an employer who withdraws from,
or significantly reduces its contribution obligation to, a multi-employer plan
generally will be required to continue funding its proportional share of the
plan's unfunded vested benefits.
Under special rules approved by the PBGC and adopted by the Pacific Coast
longshore plan in 1984, the Company could cease Pacific Coast cargo-handling
operations permanently and stop contributing to the plan without any withdrawal
liability, provided that the plan meets certain funding obligations as defined
in the plan. The estimated withdrawal liabilities under the Hawaii longshore
plan and the seagoing plans aggregated approximately $2,465,000 as of December
31, 2001, based on estimates by plan actuaries. Management has no present
intention of withdrawing from and does not anticipate termination of any of the
aforementioned plans.
45
Pension Benefits Other Post-retirement Benefits
------------------------------- -----------------------------
2001 2000 1999 2001 2000 1999
--------- --------- --------- -------- -------- --------
(in thousands)
Change in Benefit Obligation
Benefit obligations at beginning of year...... $ 235,000 $ 218,189 $ 229,573 $ 37,910 $ 47,836 $ 55,298
Service cost.................................. 4,844 4,877 5,705 443 504 892
Interest cost................................. 17,549 16,882 15,013 2,720 2,939 3,460
Plan participants' contributions.............. -- -- -- 1,137 1,165 1,423
Actuarial (gain) loss......................... 13,130 (2,016) (25,177) 2,314 (2,652) (8,198)
Benefits paid................................. (14,094) (13,146) (12,109) (3,452) (3,635) (4,320)
Amendments.................................... 498 1,137 10,129 -- -- --
Settlements................................... -- 8,602 (1,304) -- (8,247) --
Curtailments.................................. -- -- (3,823) -- -- (719)
Special or contractual termination benefits... -- 475 182 -- -- --
--------- --------- --------- -------- -------- --------
Benefit obligation at end of year............. 256,927 235,000 218,189 41,072 37,910 47,836
--------- --------- --------- -------- -------- --------
Change in Plan Assets
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year 364,299 381,090 338,267 -- -- --
Actual return on plan assets.................. (35,747) (3,645) 56,236 -- -- --
Settlements................................... -- -- (1,304) -- -- --
Employer contribution......................... 135 -- -- -- -- --
Benefits paid................................. (14,094) (13,146) (12,109) -- -- --
--------- --------- --------- -------- -------- --------
Fair value of plan assets at end of year...... 314,593 364,299 381,090 -- -- --
--------- --------- --------- -------- -------- --------
Accrued Asset (Obligation)
Plan assets less benefit obligation........... 57,666 129,299 162,901 (41,072) (37,910) (47,836)
Unrecognized net actuarial gain............... (4,963) (91,307) (135,670) (4,232) (9,134) (15,841)
Unrecognized transition asset................. -- (63) (183) -- -- --
Unrecognized prior service cost............... 10,597 12,547 13,939 72 79 32
--------- --------- --------- -------- -------- --------
Accrued asset (obligation).................... $ 63,300 $ 50,476 $ 40,987 $(45,232) $(46,965) $(63,645)
========= ========= ========= ======== ======== ========
Components of Net Periodic
Benefit Cost/(Income)
Service cost.................................. $ 4,844 $ 4,877 $ 5,705 $ 443 $ 504 $ 892
Interest cost................................. 17,549 16,882 15,013 2,720 2,939 3,460
Expected return on plan assets................ (32,107) (33,651) (29,922) -- -- --
Recognition of net gain....................... (5,360) (9,083) (4,251) (2,522) (2,872) (2,644)
Amortization of prior service cost............ 2,448 2,528 905 7 7 8
Amortization of unrecognized transition asset. (63) (119) (713) -- -- --
Recognition of settlement (gain)/loss......... -- 8,602 (53) -- (14,800) --
Recognition of curtailment gain............... -- -- (3,641) -- -- (292)
--------- --------- --------- -------- -------- --------
Net periodic benefit cost/(income)............ $ (12,689) $ (9,964) $ (16,957) $ 648 $(14,222) $ 1,424
========= ========= ========= ======== ======== ========
Cost of termination benefits recognized....... $ -- $ 475 $ 182 $ -- $ -- $ --
========= ========= ========= ======== ======== ========
46
11. INCOME TAXES
The income tax expense for the three years ended December 31, 2001 consisted
of the following:
2001 2000 1999
------- ------- -------
(in thousands)
Current:
Federal......... $65,881 $26,186 $21,035
State........... 8,900 847 3,461
------- ------- -------
Current........... 74,781 27,033 24,496
Deferred.......... (7,389) 17,358 8,465
------- ------- -------
Income tax expense $67,392 $44,391 $32,961
======= ======= =======
Income tax expense for the three years ended December 31, 2001 differs from
amounts computed by applying the statutory federal rate to pre-tax income, for
the following reasons:
2001 2000 1999
------- ------- -------
(in thousands)
Computed federal income tax expense............. $65,522 $42,950 $33,439
State tax on income, less applicable federal tax 5,285 2,968 3,790
Low-income housing credits...................... (859) (1,124) (1,161)
Dividend exclusion.............................. (867) (954) (860)
Prior years' tax settlement..................... -- -- (2,815)
Fair market value over cost of donations........ (1,481) -- --
Other--net...................................... (208) 551 568
------- ------- -------
Income tax expense.............................. $67,392 $44,391 $32,961
======= ======= =======
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant
portions of the net deferred tax liability at December 31, 2001 and 2000 were
as follows:
2001 2000
-------- --------
(in thousands)
Property basis and depreciation............... $166,810 $180,895
Tax-deferred gains on real estate transactions 106,993 104,033
Capital Construction Fund..................... 61,998 58,704
Unrealized holding gains on securities........ -- 36,371
Pensions...................................... 24,720 19,447
Post-retirement benefits...................... (17,331) (17,900)
Insurance reserves............................ (9,301) (10,740)
Other--net.................................... (4,504) 3,143
-------- --------
Total......................................... $329,385 $373,953
======== ========
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) completed its examination of the
Company's tax returns through 1997. The IRS is currently auditing the Company's
tax returns for 1998 and 1999. Management believes that the outcome of the
current audit will not have a material effect on the Company's financial
position or results of operations.
12. STOCK OPTIONS
Employee Stock Option Plans: The Company has two stock option plans under
which key employees are granted options to purchase shares of the Company's
common stock. There are no longer any outstanding options under a third plan,
which terminated in 1993.
47
Adopted in 1998, the Company's 1998 Stock Option/Stock Incentive Plan ("1998
Plan") provides for the issuance of non-qualified stock options to employees of
the Company. Under the 1998 Plan, option prices may not be less than the fair
market value of the Company's common stock on the dates of grant, the options
become exercisable over periods determined, at the dates of grant, by the
committee that administers the plan (generally ratably over three years), and
the options generally expire ten years from the date of grant. Payments for
options exercised may be made in cash or in shares of the Company's stock. If
an option to purchase shares is exercised within five years of the date of
grant and if payment is made in shares of the Company's stock, the option
holder may receive, under a reload feature, a new stock option grant for such
number of shares as is equal to the number surrendered, with an option price
not less than the greater of the fair market value of the Company's stock on
the date of exercise or one and one-half times the original option price.
Adopted in 1989, the Company's 1989 Stock Option/Stock Incentive Plan ("1989
Plan") is substantially the same as the 1998 Plan, except that each option is
generally exercisable in-full one year after the date granted. The 1989 Plan
terminated in January 1999, but options granted through 1998 remain exercisable.
The 1998 and 1989 Plans also permit the issuance of shares of the Company's
common stock as a reward for past service rendered to the Company or one of its
subsidiaries or as an incentive for future service with such entities. The
recipients' interest in such shares may be vested fully upon issuance or may
vest in one or more installments, upon such terms and conditions as are
determined by the committee which administers the plans. The number of
incentive shares issued during 2001 or outstanding at the end of the year was
not material.
Director Stock Option Plans: The Company has two Directors' stock option
plans. Under the 1998 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan ("1998 Directors'
Plan"), each non-employee Director of the Company, elected at an Annual Meeting
of Shareholders, is automatically granted, on the date of each such Annual
Meeting, an option to purchase 3,000 shares of the Company's common stock at
the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant. Each option to
purchase shares becomes exercisable in three successive annual installments of
1,000 shares beginning one year after the date granted.
The 1989 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan ("1989 Directors' Plan")
is substantially the same as the 1998 Directors' Plan, except that each option
generally becomes exercisable in-full one year after the date granted. This
plan terminated in January 1999, but options granted through termination remain
exercisable.
Changes in shares and the weighted average exercise prices for the three
years ended December 31, 2001, were as follows:
Employee Plans Directors' Plans
------------------ -------------------- Weighted
1998 1989 Average
1998 1989 1983 Directors' Directors' Total Exercise
Plan Plan Plan Plan Plan Shares Price
----- ----- ---- ---------- ---------- ------ --------
(shares in thousands)
December 31, 1998 100 3,263 161 - 204 3,728 $26.69
Granted.......... 515 - - 24 - 539 $20.65
Exercised........ - (4) - - - (4) $22.02
Canceled......... (2) (373) (161) - (15) (551) $29.16
----- ----- ---- -- --- ----- ------
December 31, 1999 613 2,886 - 24 189 3,712 $25.43
Granted.......... 511 - - 24 - 535 $21.70
Exercised........ (7) (139) - - - (146) $23.79
Canceled......... (31) (340) - - (21) (392) $29.49
----- ----- ---- -- --- ----- ------
December 31, 2000 1,086 2,407 - 48 168 3,709 $24.52
Granted.......... 590 - - 24 - 614 $27.23
Exercised........ (35) (244) - - - (279) $23.53
Canceled......... (14) (21) - - (21) (56) $25.81
----- ----- ---- -- --- ----- ------
December 31, 2001 1,627 2,142 - 72 147 3,988 $24.99
----- ----- ---- -- --- ----- ------
Exercisable...... 550 2,142 - 24 147 2,863 $25.19
----- ----- ---- -- --- ----- ------
48
As of December 31, 2001, the Company had reserved 431,000 and 58,000 shares
of its common stock for the exercise of options under the 1998 Plan and 1998
Directors' Plan, respectively. Additional information about stock options
outstanding as of 2001 year-end is summarized below:
Weighted Weighted
Shares Average Weighted Shares Average
Outstanding Remaining Average Exercisable Price of
as of Contractual Exercise as of Exercisable
Range of Exercise Price 12/31/2001 Years Price 12/31/2001 Options
- ----------------------- ----------- ----------- -------- ----------- -----------
(shares in thousands)
$0.00.............. 16 9.1 $ 0.00 -- --
$20.01 - 22.00..... 1,170 6.3 $21.31 682 $21.31
$22.01 - 24.00..... 445 4.3 $23.07 360 $23.05
$24.01 - 26.00..... 382 1.6 $24.37 378 $24.36
$26.01 - 28.00..... 1,025 3.3 $27.05 1,025 $27.05
$28.01 - 30.00..... 852 5.7 $28.33 320 $28.35
$30.01 - 34.88..... 98 0.8 $33.51 98 $33.51
----- --- ------ ----- ------
$ 0.00 - 34.88..... 3,988 4.7 $24.99 2,863 $25.19
----- --- ------ ----- ------
Accounting Method for Stock-based Compensation: The Company applies
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees," and related Interpretations, to account for its stock-based
compensation plans. Accordingly, no compensation cost is recognized in the
Company's income statement for stock option plans at the time grants are
awarded. Pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per share is
required, using the fair value method, by SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for
Stock-based Compensation."
The fair value of options granted for each of the three years ended December
31, 2001, reported below, has been estimated using a Black-Scholes option
pricing model. This model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of
traded options which do not have vesting requirements and which are fully
transferable. The Company's options have characteristics significantly
different from those of traded options. The following assumptions were used in
determining the pro forma amounts:
2001 2000 1999
---- ---- ----
Stock volatility........................ 25.2% 25.0% 24.8%
Expected term from grant date (in years) 6.2 6.7 6.5
Risk-free interest rate................. 4.5% 6.0% 5.0%
Forfeiture discount..................... 2.6% 0.3% 0.2%
Dividend yield.......................... 3.3% 3.4% 4.0%
Based upon the above assumptions, the computed annual weighted average fair
value of employee stock options granted during 2001, 2000, and 1999 was $6.22,
$5.54, and $4.63, respectively, per option.
Had compensation cost for the stock options granted during the past three
years been based on the estimated fair value at grant dates, as prescribed by
SFAS No. 123, the Company's pro forma net income and net income per share would
have been as follows:
2001 2000 1999
-------- ------- -------
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Net Income:
As reported......... $110,628 $90,574 $62,579
Pro forma........... $108,848 $89,060 $61,108
Net Income Per Share:
Basic, as reported.. $ 2.73 $ 2.21 $ 1.45
Basic, pro forma.... $ 2.69 $ 2.18 $ 1.41
Diluted, as reported $ 2.72 $ 2.21 $ 1.45
Diluted, pro forma.. $ 2.67 $ 2.17 $ 1.42
49
The pro forma disclosures of net income and earnings per share are not
likely to be representative of the pro forma effects on future net income or
earnings per share, because the number of future shares which may be issued is
not known, shares vest over several years, and assumptions used to determine
the fair value can vary significantly.
Shareholder Rights Plan: The Company has a Shareholder Rights Plan,
designed to protect the interests of shareholders in the event an attempt is
made to acquire the Company. The rights initially will trade with the Company's
outstanding common stock and will not be exercisable absent certain
acquisitions or attempted acquisitions of specified percentages of such stock.
If exercisable, the rights generally entitle shareholders (other than the
acquiring party) to purchase additional shares of the Company's stock or shares
of an acquiring company's stock at prices below market value.
13. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS, COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
At December 31, 2001, the Company and its subsidiaries had an unspent
balance of total appropriations for capital expenditures of approximately
$77,633,000. However, there are no contractual obligations to spend this entire
amount.
The Company has arranged for standby letters of credit totaling $26,019,000.
This includes letters of credit, totaling approximately $13,959,000, which
enable the Company to qualify as a self-insurer for state and federal workers'
compensation liabilities. The amount also includes a letter of credit of
$6,112,000 for workers' compensation claims incurred by C&H employees, under a
now-closed self-insurance plan, prior to December 24, 1998 (see Note 5). The
Company only would be called upon to honor this letter of credit in the event
of C&H's insolvency. The obligation to provide this letter of credit expires on
December 24, 2003. The remaining letters of credit are for insurance-related
matters, construction performance guarantees and other routine operating
matters.
C&H is a party to a sugar supply contract with Hawaiian Sugar &
Transportation Cooperative (HS&TC), a raw sugar marketing and transportation
cooperative that the Company uses to market and transport its sugar to C&H.
Under the terms of this contract, which expires in June 2003, C&H (an
unconsolidated entity in which the Company has a minority ownership equity
interest--see Notes 4 and 5) is obligated to purchase, and HS&TC is obligated
to sell, all of the raw sugar delivered to HS&TC by the Hawaii sugar growers,
at prices determined by the quoted domestic sugar market. The Company delivered
to HS&TC raw sugar totaling $70,149,000, $64,455,000, and $83,412,000, during
2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively. The Company has guaranteed up to
$15,000,000 of HS&TC's $30,000,000 working capital line. The facility is fully
collateralized by raw-sugar inventory. At December 31, 2001, HS&TC had borrowed
$2,500,000 under that facility.
The State of Hawaii, Department of Taxation (State) has informed the
Company that it believes a portion of the Company's ocean transportation
revenue is subject to the Public Service Company tax. The Company strongly
disagrees with the State's tax position. If the State were to prevail fully,
the amount of the claim could be material. Management believes, after
consultation with legal counsel, that the ultimate disposition of this matter
will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations
or financial position.
Note 5 contains additional information about transactions with
unconsolidated affiliates, which affiliates are also related parties, due to
the Company's minority interest investments.
The Company and certain subsidiaries are parties to various legal actions
and are contingently liable in connection with claims and contracts arising in
the normal course of business, the outcome of which, in the opinion of
management after consultation with legal counsel, will not have a material
adverse effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations.
14. INDUSTRY SEGMENTS
Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which
separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the
chief operating decision maker, or decision-making group, in deciding how to
allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company's chief operating
decision-making group is
50
made up of the president and lead executives of the Company and each of the
Company's segments. The lead executive for each operating segment manages the
profitability, cash flows and assets of his or her respective segment's various
product or service lines and businesses. The operating segments are managed
separately, because each operating segment represents a strategic business unit
that offers different products or services and serves different markets.
The Company's reportable operating segments include Ocean Transportation,
Property Development and Management and Food Products. The Ocean Transportation
segment carries freight between various United States West Coast, Hawaii and
other Pacific ports; holds investments in ocean transportation and terminal
service businesses (see Note 5); and provides terminal and cargo logistics
services. The Property Development and Management segment develops, manages and
sells residential, commercial and industrial properties. The Food Products
segment grows and processes raw sugar and molasses; invests in a sugar refining
and marketing business (see Note 5); grows, mills and markets coffee; and
generates and sells electricity.
The accounting policies of the operating segments are the same as those
described in the summary of significant policies. Reportable segments are
measured based on operating profit, exclusive of non-operating or unusual
transactions, interest expense, general corporate expenses and income taxes.
51
Industry segment information for each of the five years ended December 31,
2001 is summarized below:
For the Year
----------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999 1998 1997
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
(in thousands)
Revenue:
Ocean transportation.................................. $ 796,840 $ 850,692 $ 778,535 $ 748,121 $ 720,962
Property development and management:
Leasing............................................. 70,685 62,105 53,910 44,433 43,606
Sales............................................... 89,156 46,322 48,036 82,382 35,916
Food products......................................... 104,376 106,341 116,362 465,661 486,912
Other................................................. 129,016 3,186 3,155 2,878 2,815
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total revenue...................................... $1,190,073 $1,068,646 $ 999,998 $1,343,475 $1,290,211
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Operating Profit:
Ocean transportation.................................. $ 62,264 $ 93,732 $ 83,778 $ 66,298 $ 80,385
Property development and management:
Leasing............................................. 34,139 30,120 27,497 22,634 24,559
Sales............................................... 17,926 24,228 17,402 21,663 13,262
Food products......................................... 5,660 7,522 11,310 21,327 27,083
Other................................................. 127,635 2,974 2,944 2,696 2,639
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total operating profit............................. 247,624 158,576 142,931 134,618 147,928
Write-down of long-lived assets....................... (28,600) -- (15,410) (20,216) --
Loss on partial sale of subsidiary.................... -- -- -- (19,756) --
Insurance settlement.................................. -- -- -- -- 19,965
Interest expense, net................................. (18,658) (24,252) (17,774) (24,799) (28,936)
General corporate expenses............................ (13,161) (11,609) (14,207) (14,552) (11,745)
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Income from continuing operations before income
taxes and accounting changes...................... $ 187,205 $ 122,715 $ 95,540 $ 55,295 $ 127,212
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Identifiable Assets:
Ocean transportation.................................. $ 888,161 $ 911,109 $ 894,607 $ 898,277 $ 930,636
Property development and management................... 476,126 440,416 384,515 338,090 317,622
Food products......................................... 139,695 197,143 173,069 261,712 382,109
Other................................................. 40,437 117,344 109,269 107,561 74,431
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total assets....................................... $1,544,419 $1,666,012 $1,561,460 $1,605,640 $1,704,798
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Capital Expenditures:
Ocean transportation.................................. $ 59,669 $ 40,190 $ 19,232 $ 60,403 $ 20,828
Property development and management/1/................ 72,050 44,821 66,752 107,408 30,790
Food products......................................... 9,454 21,677 17,271 18,237 18,806
Other................................................. 267 216 258 441 242
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total capital expenditures......................... $ 141,440 $ 106,904 $ 103,513 $ 186,489 $ 70,666
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Depreciation and Amortization:
Ocean transportation.................................. $ 55,359 $ 54,586 $ 56,174 $ 61,543 $ 62,192
Property development and management................... 10,486 8,972 7,299 6,357 6,281
Food products.......................................... 9,118 8,285 9,962 20,086 19,538
Other.................................................. 470 461 466 514 547
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total depreciation and amortization................ $ 75,433 $ 72,304 $ 73,901 $ 88,500 $ 88,558
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
- --------
See Note 2 for information regarding changes in presentation for certain
revenues and expenses.
See Note 3 for information regarding discontinued operations.
See Note 4 for discussion of the write-down of long-lived assets and
investments.
See Note 5 for discussion of the partial sale of California and Hawaiian Sugar
Company, Inc.
/1/ Includes tax-deferred property purchases which are considered non-cash
transactions in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; excludes capital
expenditures for real estate developments held for sale.
52
15. QUARTERLY INFORMATION (Unaudited)
Segment results by quarter for 2001 are listed below:
2001
---------------------------------------
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
-------- -------- -------- --------
(in thousands, except per-share amounts)
Revenue:
Ocean transportation............................... $196,609 $203,212 $207,828 $189,191
Property development and management:...............
Leasing.......................................... 17,096 17,490 18,103 17,996
Sales............................................ 43,084 29,155 5,063 11,854
Food products...................................... 18,185 28,076 32,268 25,847
Other.............................................. 857 16,188 803 111,168
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total revenue.................................... $275,831 $294,121 $264,065 $356,056
======== ======== ======== ========
Operating Profit (Loss):
Ocean transportation............................... $ 17,455 $ 18,713 $ 24,245 $ 1,851
Property development and management:
Leasing.......................................... 8,740 8,679 8,704 8,016
Sales............................................ 12,216 3,551 (405) 2,564
Food products/1/................................... 5,802 1,509 2,235 (3,886)
Other.............................................. 840 16,107 767 109,921
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total operating profit........................... 45,053 48,559 35,546 118,466
Impairment loss on Investments/1/.................... -- -- -- (28,600)
Interest Expense..................................... (5,779) (4,870) (4,330) (3,679)
General Corporate Expenses........................... (3,791) (3,191) (2,878) (3,301)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Income From Continuing Operations before Income Taxes 35,483 40,498 28,338 82,886
Income taxes....................................... (12,603) (15,496) (10,475) (28,818)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Income From Continuing Operations.................... 22,880 25,002 17,863 54,068
Discontinued Operations (net of income taxes)/2/..... (446) (488) (551) (7,700)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net Income........................................... $ 22,434 $ 24,514 $ 17,312 $ 46,368
======== ======== ======== ========
Earnings Per Share:
Basic.............................................. $ 0.55 $ 0.61 $ 0.42 $ 1.15
Diluted............................................ $ 0.55 $ 0.60 $ 0.42 $ 1.15
/1/ See Note 4 for discussion of the write-down of the Company's investment in
C&H and certain power equipment.
/2/ See Note 3 for discussion of discontinued operations.
Fourth quarter 2001 results include the sale of the Company's BancWest stock
holdings (see Note 5; amount included in the "Other" segment), the impairment
loss related to the Company's investment in C&H (see Note 4) and a write-off of
power generation assets (see Note 4). In addition, the Company discontinued and
abandoned its panelboard business and restated previously reported quarters
(see Notes 2 and 3).
53
Segment results by quarter for 2000 are listed below:
2000
---------------------------------------
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
-------- -------- -------- --------
(in thousands, except per-share amounts)
Revenue:.............................................................
Ocean transportation/1/.......................................... $200,225 $213,584 $220,759 $216,124
Property development and management:
Leasing/1/.................................................... 14,518 15,287 15,522 16,778
Sales......................................................... 3,052 24,987 14,435 3,848
Food products.................................................... 13,666 34,504 34,294 23,877
Other............................................................ 764 798 776 848
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total revenue................................................. $232,225 $289,160 $285,786 $261,475
======== ======== ======== ========
Operating Profit (Loss):
Ocean transportation............................................. $ 19,893 $ 27,914 $ 26,106 $ 19,819
Property development and management:.............................
Leasing....................................................... 7,184 7,606 7,467 7,863
Sales......................................................... 701 18,917 5,472 (862)
Food products.................................................... 2,068 (2,060) 2,901 4,613
Other............................................................ 709 764 745 756
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total operating profit........................................ 30,555 53,141 42,691 32,189
Interest Expense..................................................... (5,347) (5,959) (6,661) (6,285)
General Corporate Expenses........................................... (3,502) (2,706) (2,392) (3,009)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Income Before Income Taxes and Accounting Change..................... 21,706 44,476 33,638 22,895
Income taxes..................................................... (7,525) (16,233) (12,284) (8,349)
Change in accounting method (net of income taxes of $7,668)/1/... 12,250 -- -- --
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net Income........................................................... $ 26,431 $ 28,243 $ 21,354 $ 14,546
======== ======== ======== ========
Earnings Per Share:
Basic............................................................ $ 0.63 $ 0.69 $ 0.53 $ 0.36
Diluted.......................................................... $ 0.63 $ 0.69 $ 0.52 $ 0.36
- --------
/1/ See Note 2 for discussion of changes in presentation and accounting method
54
16. PARENT COMPANY CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Set forth below are the unconsolidated condensed financial statements of
Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (Parent Company). The significant accounting policies
used in preparing these financial statements are substantially the same as
those used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements as
described in Note 1, except that, for purposes of the tables presented in this
footnote, subsidiaries are carried under the equity method.
The following table presents the Parent Company's condensed Balance Sheets
as of December 31, 2001 and 2000:
2001 2000
---------- ----------
(in thousands)
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents........................ $ 15,509 $ 126
Accounts and notes receivable, net............... 11,971 10,065
Prepaid expenses and other....................... 13,157 1923,432
---------- ----------
Total current assets.......................... 40,637 23,623
---------- ----------
Investments:
Subsidiaries consolidated, at equity............. 545,819 678,636
Other............................................ 1,630 110,714
---------- ----------
Total investments............................. 547,449 789,350
---------- ----------
Property, at Cost.................................... 367,332 348,774
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization... 167,445 161,246
---------- ----------
Property--net................................. 199,887 187,528
---------- ----------
Due from Subsidiaries................................ 162,118 46,706
---------- ----------
Other Assets......................................... 31,592 27,973
---------- ----------
Total......................................... $ 981,683 $1,075,180
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt................ $ 7,500 $ 7,500
Accounts payable................................. 4,157 2,784
Income taxes payable............................. 55,034 1,000
Other............................................ 15,572 22,693
---------- ----------
Total current liabilities..................... 82,263 33,977
---------- ----------
Long-term Debt....................................... 107,500 231,000
---------- ----------
Other Long-term Liabilities.......................... 16,184 14,762
---------- ----------
Deferred Income Taxes................................ 65,069 101,790
---------- ----------
Commitments and Contingencies
Shareholders' Equity:
Capital stock.................................... 33,328 33,248
Additional capital............................... 66,659 58,007
Unrealized holding gains on securities........... -- 61,937
Retained earnings................................ 622,615 552,637
Cost of treasury stock........................... (11,935) (12,178)
---------- ----------
Total shareholders' equity.................... 710,667 693,651
---------- ----------
Total......................................... $ 981,683 $1,075,180
========== ==========
55
The following table presents the Parent Company's condensed Statements of
Income for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999:
2001 2000 1999
-------- -------- --------
(in thousands)
Revenue:
Food products............................................................................... $ 84,428 $ 77,190 $ --
Property leasing............................................................................ 16,422 14,397 10,999
Property sales.............................................................................. 15,569 19,732 803
Interest, dividends and other............................................................... 131,672 5,055 3,180
-------- -------- --------
Total revenue............................................................................. 248,091 116,374 14,982
-------- -------- --------
Costs and Expenses:
Cost of agricultural goods and services..................................................... 78,491 77,302 --
Cost of property sales and leasing services................................................. 16,764 8,194 4,808
Selling, general and administrative......................................................... 13,160 11,609 9,686
Interest and other.......................................................................... 20,852 20,220 1,770
Income taxes................................................................................ 42,272 (1,273) (3,271)
-------- -------- --------
Total costs and expenses.................................................................. 171,539 116,052 12,993
-------- -------- --------
Income Before Equity in Net Income of Subsidiaries Consolidated............................... 76,552 322 1,989
Equity in Net Income of Subsidiaries Consolidated............................................. 43,261 90,252 60,590
Equity in Net Loss from Discontinued Operations of Subsidiaries Consolidated.................. (9,185) -- --
-------- -------- --------
Net Income.................................................................................... 110,628 90,574 62,579
Unrealized holding gains (losses) and reclassification of realized gains on securities, net of
income taxes................................................................................. (61,937) 12,476 (13,868)
-------- -------- --------
Comprehensive Income.......................................................................... $ 48,691 $103,050 $ 48,711
======== ======== ========
56
The following table presents the Parent Company's condensed Statements of
Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999:
2001 2000 1999
--------- --------- --------
(in thousands)
Cash Flows from Operations........................... $ 6,180 $ (5,634) $ 3,579
--------- --------- --------
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Capital expenditures............................... (22,800) (18,107) (1,346)
Proceeds from disposal of property and investments. 138,222 3,705 --
Dividends received from subsidiaries............... 40,000 50,000 50,000
--------- --------- --------
Net cash provided by investing activities.......... 155,422 35,598 48,654
--------- --------- --------
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Increase (decrease) in intercompany payable........ 11,481 (8,507) 20,757
Proceeds from (repayments of) long-term debt, net.. (123,500) 60,500 --
Proceeds from issuance of capital stock............ 4,558 2,961 101
Repurchases of capital stock....................... (2,270) (48,260) (34,824)
Dividends paid..................................... (36,488) (36,785) (38,899)
--------- --------- --------
Net cash used in financing activities.............. (146,219) (30,091) (52,865)
--------- --------- --------
Cash and Cash Equivalents:
Net increase (decrease) for the year............... 15,383 (127) (632)
Balance, beginning of year......................... 126 253 885
--------- --------- --------
Balance, end of year............................... $ 15,509 $ 126 $ 253
========= ========= ========
Other Cash Flow Information:
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized.......... $ (14,386) $ (16,485) $ (303)
Income taxes paid.................................. (20,961) (31,807) (34,213)
Other Non-cash Information:
Depreciation expense............................... (12,216) (11,037) (2,550)
Tax-deferred property sales........................ 12,415 18,692 --
Tax-deferred property purchases.................... (12,076) (18,459) --
General Information and Principles of Consolidation: Alexander & Baldwin,
Inc. ("Parent Company"), headquartered in Honolulu Hawaii, is engaged in the
operations that are described in Note 14, "Industry Segments." Due to a merger,
one of the Company's wholly owned subsidiaries, A&B-Hawaii, Inc., is included
in the Parent Company's financial statements effective January 1, 2000.
Previously, A&B-Hawaii, Inc. was accounted for in the Parent Company financial
statements using the equity method.
Investments: Other investments on the Parent Company Balance Sheet at
December 31, 2000, consisted primarily of marketable equity securities that
were liquidated during 2001 (see Note 5).
Long-term Debt: The Parent Company's long term debt at December 31, 2001
consisted of all the debt that is described in Footnote 8, with the exceptions
of $99,878,000 of commercial paper notes and $12,400,000 of variable rate
loans. At December 31, 2001, maturities and planned prepayments of all
long-term debt during the next five years are $7,500,000 for 2002, $9,643,000
for 2003, $12,500,000 for 2004, $17,500,000 for 2005 and $17,500,000 for 2006.
Other Long-term Liabilities: Other Long-term Liabilities at December 31,
2001 and 2000 consisted principally of deferred compensation, executive benefit
plans and self-insurance liabilities.
Additional Information: Additional information related to the Parent
Company is described in the foregoing notes to the consolidated financial
statements.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
57
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
A. Directors
For information about the directors of A&B, see the section captioned
"Election of Directors" in A&B's proxy statement dated March 11, 2002 ("A&B's
2002 Proxy Statement"), which section is incorporated herein by reference.
B. Executive Officers of the Registrant
The name of each executive officer of A&B (in alphabetical order), age (in
parentheses) as of March 31, 2002, and present and prior positions with A&B and
business experience for the past five years are given below.
Generally, the term of office of executive officers is at the pleasure of
the Board of Directors. For a discussion of compliance with Section 16(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by A&B's directors and executive officers,
see the subsection captioned "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance" in A&B's 2002 Proxy Statement, which subsection is incorporated
herein by reference. For a discussion of severance agreements between A&B and
certain of A&B's executive officers, see the subsection captioned "Severance
Agreements" in A&B's 2002 Proxy Statement, which subsection is incorporated
herein by reference.
James S. Andrasick (58)
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of A&B,
6/00-present; President and Chief Operating Officer, C. Brewer and Company,
Limited, 9/92-3/00.
Meredith J. Ching (45)
Vice President (Government & Community Relations) of A&B, 10/92-present;
Vice President of A&B-Hawaii, Inc. ("ABHI") (Government & Community Relations),
10/92-12/99; first joined A&B or a subsidiary in 1982.
Matthew J. Cox (40)
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller of Matson,
6/01-present; Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
Distribution Dynamics, Inc., 8/99-6/01; Vice President, American President
Lines, Ltd., 12/86-7/99.
W. Allen Doane (54)
President and Chief Executive Officer of A&B, and Director of A&B and
Matson, 10/98-present; Vice Chairman of Matson, 12/98-present; Executive Vice
President of A&B, 8/98-10/98; Director of ABHI, 4/97-12/99; Chief Executive
Officer of ABHI, 1/97-12/99; President of ABHI, 4/95-12/99; first joined A&B or
a subsidiary in 1991.
John F. Gasher (68)
Vice President (Human Resources) of A&B, 12/99-present; Vice President
(Human Resources Development) of ABHI, 1/97-12/99; first joined A&B or a
subsidiary in 1960.
G. Stephen Holaday (57)
Vice President of A&B, 12/99-present; Senior Vice President of ABHI,
4/89-12/99; Vice President and Controller of A&B, 4/93-1/96; first joined A&B
or a subsidiary in 1983.
58
John B. Kelley (56)
Vice President (Investor Relations) of A&B, 8/01-present; Vice President
(Corporate Planning & Investor Relations) of A&B, 10/99-8/01; Vice President
(Investor Relations) of A&B, 1/95-10/99; Vice President of ABHI, 9/89-12/99;
first joined A&B or a subsidiary in 1979.
Stanley M. Kuriyama (48)
Vice President (Properties Group) of A&B, 2/99-present; Chief Executive
Officer and Vice Chairman of A&B Properties, Inc., 12/99-present; Executive
Vice President of ABHI, 2/99-12/99; Vice President of ABHI, 1/92-1/99; first
joined A&B or a subsidiary in 1992.
Michael J. Marks (63)
Vice President and General Counsel of A&B, 9/80-present; Secretary of A&B,
8/84-1/99; Senior Vice President and General Counsel of ABHI, 4/89-12/99; first
joined A&B or a subsidiary in 1975.
C. Bradley Mulholland (60)
Executive Vice President of A&B, 8/98-present; President of Matson,
5/90-present; Chief Executive Officer of Matson, 4/92-present; Director of A&B,
4/91-present; Director of Matson, 7/89-present; Director of ABHI, 4/91-12/99;
first joined Matson in 1965.
Alyson J. Nakamura (36)
Secretary of A&B, 2/99-present; Assistant Secretary of A&B, 6/94-1/99;
Secretary of ABHI, 6/94-12/99; first joined A&B or a subsidiary in 1994.
Raymond L. Smith (47)
Chief Operating Officer of Matson, 11/01-present; Chief Executive Officer,
Ampent, 3/01-10/01; Chief Executive Officer, Fritz Companies, Inc., 1/99-11/00;
President, United States Fleet Leasing, 2/93-1/99.
Thomas A. Wellman (43)
Controller of A&B, 1/96-present; Assistant Treasurer, 1/96-12/99,
6/00-present; Treasurer of A&B, 1/00-5/00; Vice President of ABHI, 1/96-12/99;
Controller of ABHI, 11/91-12/99; first joined A&B or a subsidiary in 1989.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
See the section captioned "Executive Compensation" in A&B's 2002 Proxy
Statement, which section is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
See the section captioned "Security Ownership of Certain Shareholders" and
the subsection titled "Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers"
in A&B's 2002 Proxy Statement, which section and subsection are incorporated
herein by reference.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
See the subsection captioned "Certain Relationships and Transactions" in
A&B's 2002 Proxy Statement, which subsection is incorporated herein by
reference.
59
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
A. Financial Statements
The financial statements are set forth in Item 8 ("Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data") above.
B. Financial Statement Schedules
The financial schedules for Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (Parent Company) are
set forth in Note 16 of Item 8 ("Financial Statements and Supplementary Data")
above. All other schedules are omitted because of the absence of the conditions
under which they are required or because the information called for is included
in the financial statements or notes thereto.
C. Exhibits Required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K
Exhibits not filed herewith are incorporated by reference to the exhibit
number and previous filing shown in parentheses. All previous exhibits were
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington, D.C. Exhibits
filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 were filed under file
number 0-565. Shareholders may obtain copies of exhibits for a copying and
handling charge of $0.15 per page by writing to Alyson J. Nakamura, Secretary,
Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., P. O. Box 3440, Honolulu, Hawaii 96801.
3. Articles of incorporation and bylaws.
3.a. Restated Articles of Association of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., as
restated effective May 5, 1986, together with Amendments dated April 28,
1988 and April 26, 1990 (Exhibits 3.a.(iii) and (iv) to A&B's Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 1990).
3.b. Revised Bylaws of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (as Amended Effective
February 22, 2001) (Exhibit 3.b.(i) to A&B's Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2000).
4. Instruments defining rights of security holders, including indentures.
4.a. Equity.
4.a. Rights Agreement, dated as of June 25, 1998 between Alexander &
Baldwin, Inc. and ChaseMellon Shareholder Services, L.L.C. and Press
Release of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (Exhibits 4 and 99 to A&B's Form
8-K dated June 25, 1998).
4.b. Debt.
4.b. Third Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Term Loan
Agreement, dated November 19, 2001, among Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. and
First Hawaiian Bank, Bank of America, N.A., Bank of Hawaii, The Bank of
New York, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, American Savings Bank,
F.S.B., and First Hawaiian Bank, as Agent.
10. Material contracts.
10.a. (i) Issuing and Paying Agent Agreement between Matson Navigation
Company, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as
successor-in-interest to Security Pacific National Trust (New York),
with respect to Matson Navigation Company, Inc.'s $150 million
commercial paper program dated September 18, 1992 (Exhibit
10.b.1.(xxviii) to A&B's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
1992).
60
(ii) Note Agreement among Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., A&B-Hawaii, Inc.
and The Prudential Insurance Company of America, effective as of
December 20, 1990 (Exhibit 10.b.(ix) to A&B's Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1990).
(iii) Note Agreement among Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., A&B-Hawaii, Inc.
and The Prudential Insurance Company of America, dated as of June 4,
1993 (Exhibit 10.a.(xiii) to A&B's Form 8-K dated June 4, 1993).
(iv) Amendment dated as of May 20, 1994 to the Note Agreements among
Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., A&B-Hawaii, Inc. and The Prudential Insurance
Company of America, dated as of December 20, 1990 and June 4, 1993
(Exhibit 10.a.(xviv) to A&B's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
1994).
(v) Amendment dated January 23, 1995 to the Note Agreement among
Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., A&B-Hawaii, Inc. and The Prudential Insurance
Company of America, dated as of December 20, 1990 (Exhibit 10.a.(xvi) to
A&B's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994).
(vi) Amendment dated as of June 30, 1995 to the Note Agreements, among
Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., A&B-Hawaii, Inc. and The Prudential Insurance
Company of America, dated as of December 20, 1990 and June 4, 1993
(Exhibit 10.a.(xxvii) to A&B's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
1995).
(vii) Amendment dated as of November 29, 1995 to the Note Agreements
among Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., A&B-Hawaii, Inc. and The Prudential
Insurance Company of America, dated as of December 20, 1990 and June 4,
1993 (Exhibit 10.a.(xvii) to A&B's Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 1995).
(viii) Revolving Credit Agreement between Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.,
A&B-Hawaii, Inc., and First Hawaiian Bank, dated December 30, 1993
(Exhibit 10.a.(xx) to A&B's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
30, 1994).
(ix) Amendment dated August 31, 1994 to the Revolving Credit Agreement
between Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., A&B-Hawaii, Inc., and First Hawaiian
Bank dated December 30, 1993 (Exhibit 10.a.(xxi) to A&B's Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended September 30, 1994).
(x) Second Amendment dated March 29, 1995 to the Revolving Credit
Agreement between Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., A&B-Hawaii, Inc., and First
Hawaiian Bank, dated December 30, 1993 (Exhibit 10.a.(xxiii) to A&B's
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1995).
(xi) Third Amendment dated November 30, 1995 to the Revolving Credit
Agreement between Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., A&B-Hawaii, Inc., and First
Hawaiian Bank, dated December 30, 1993 (Exhibit 10.a.(xvii) to A&B's
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996).
(xii) Fourth Amendment dated November 25, 1996 to the Revolving Credit
Agreement between Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., A&B-Hawaii, Inc., and First
Hawaiian Bank, dated December 30, 1993 (Exhibit 10.a.(xviii) to A&B's
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996).
(xiii) Fifth Amendment dated November 28, 1997 to the Revolving Credit
Agreement between Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., A&B-Hawaii, Inc., and First
Hawaiian Bank, dated December 30, 1993 (Exhibit 10.a.(xix) to A&B's Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997).
(xiv) Sixth Amendment dated November 30, 1998 to the Revolving Credit
Agreement between Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., A&B-Hawaii, Inc., and First
Hawaiian Bank, dated December 30, 1993 (Exhibit 10.a.(xiv) to A&B's Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998).
(xv) Seventh Amendment dated November 23, 1999 to the Revolving Credit
Agreement between Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., A&B-Hawaii, Inc., and First
Hawaiian Bank, dated December 30, 1993 (Exhibit 10.a.(xv) to A&B's Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999).
61
(xvi) Eighth Amendment dated May 3, 2000 to the Revolving Credit
Agreement ("Agreement") between Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. and First
Hawaiian Bank, dated December 30, 1993 (A&B-Hawaii, Inc., an original
party to the Agreement, was merged into Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.
effective December 31, 1999) (Exhibit 10.a.(xxvii) to A&B's Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2000).
(xvii) Ninth Amendment dated November 16, 2000 to the Revolving Credit
Agreement between Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. and First Hawaiian Bank,
dated December 30, 1993 (Exhibit 10.a.(xvii) to A&B's Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2000).
(xviii) Tenth Amendment dated November 30, 2001 to the Revolving Credit
Agreement between Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. and First Hawaiian Bank,
dated December 30, 1993.
(xix) Private Shelf Agreement between Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.,
A&B-Hawaii, Inc., and Prudential Insurance Company of America, dated as
of August 2, 1996 (Exhibit 10.a.(xxxiii) to A&B's Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 1996).
(xx) First Amendment, dated as of February 5, 1999, to the Private Shelf
Agreement between Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., A&B-Hawaii, Inc., and
Prudential Insurance Company of America, dated as of August 2, 1996
(Exhibit 10.a.(xxii) to A&B's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1998).
(xxi) Private Shelf Agreement between Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. and
Prudential Insurance Company of America, dated as of April 25, 2001
(Exhibit 10.a.(xlvii) to A&B's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2001).
(xxii) Amendment, dated as of April 25, 2001, to the Note Agreement
among Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., A&B-Hawaii, Inc. and The Prudential
Insurance Company of America, dated as of June 4, 1993, and the Private
Shelf Agreement between Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., A&B-Hawaii, Inc., and
Prudential Insurance Company of America, dated as of August 2, 1996
(Exhibit 10.a.(xlviii) to A&B's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2001).
(xxiii) Private Shelf Agreement between Matson Navigation Company, Inc.
and Prudential Insurance Company of America, dated as of June 29, 2001
(Exhibit 10.a.(xlix) to A&B's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2001).
(xxiv) Amended and Restated Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of
December 24, 1998, by and among California and Hawaiian Sugar Company,
Inc., A&B-Hawaii, Inc., McBryde Sugar Company, Limited and Sugar
Acquisition Corporation (without exhibits or schedules) (Exhibit
10.a.1.(xxxvi) to A&B's Form 8-K dated December 24, 1998).
(xxv) Amended and Restated Stock Sale Agreement, dated as of December
24, 1998, by and between California and Hawaiian Sugar Company, Inc. and
Citicorp Venture Capital, Ltd. (without exhibits) (Exhibit
10.a.1.(xxxvii) to A&B's Form 8-K dated December 24, 1998).
(xxvi) Pro forma financial information relative to the Amended and
Restated Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 24, 1998, by and
among California and Hawaiian Sugar Company, Inc., A&BHawaii, Inc.,
McBryde Sugar Company, Limited and Sugar Acquisition Corporaion, and the
Amended and Restated Stock Sale Agreement, dated as of December 24,
1998, by and between California and Hawaiian Sugar Company, Inc. and
Citicorp Venture Capital, Ltd. (Exhibit 10.a.1.(xxxviii) to A&B's Form
8-K dated December 24, 1998).
*10.b.1. (i) Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. 1989 Stock Option/Stock Incentive
Plan (Exhibit 10.c.1.(ix) to A&B's Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 1988).
(ii) Amendment No. 1 to the Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. 1989 Stock
Option/Stock Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.b.1.(xxvi) to A&B's Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 1992).
- --------
* All exhibits listed under 10.b.1. are management contracts or compensatory
plans or arrangements.
62
(iii) Amendment No. 2 to the Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. 1989 Stock
Option/Stock Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.b.1.(iv) to A&B's Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 1994).
(iv) Amendment No. 3 to the Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. 1989 Stock
Option/Stock Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.b.1.(ix) to A&B's Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1994).
(v) Amendment No. 4 to the Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. 1989 Stock
Option/Stock Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.b.1.(v) to A&B's Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2000).
(vi) Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. 1989 Non-Employee Director Stock Option
Plan (Exhibit 10.c.1.(x) to A&B's Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 1988).
(vii) Amendment No. 1 to the Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. 1989 Non-Employee
Director Stock Option Plan (Exhibit 10.b.1.(xxiv) to A&B's Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1991).
(viii) Amendment No. 2 to the Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. 1989
Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (Exhibit 10.b.1.(xxvii) to A&B's
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1992).
(ix) Amendment No. 3 to the Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. 1989 Non-Employee
Director Stock Option Plan (Exhibit 10.b.1.(ix) to A&B's Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2000).
(x) Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. 1998 Stock Option/Stock Incentive Plan
(Exhibit 10.b.1.(xxxii) to A&B's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 1998).
(xi) Amendment No. 1 to the Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. 1998 Stock
Option/Stock Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.b.1.(xi) to A&B's Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2000).
(xii) Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. 1998 Non-Employee Director Stock Option
Plan (Exhibit 10.b.1.(xxxiii) to A&B's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 1998).
(xiii) Amendment No. 1 to the Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. 1998
Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (Exhibit 10.b.1.(xiii) to A&B's
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000).
(xiv) Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. Non-Employee Director Stock Retainer
Plan, dated June 25, 1998 (Exhibit 10.b.1.(xxxiv) to A&B's Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 1998).
(xv) Amendment No. 1 to Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. Non-Employee Director
Stock Retainer Plan, effective December 9, 1999 (Exhibit 10.b.1.(xi) to
A&B's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999).
(xvi) Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Alexander
& Baldwin, Inc. and R. J. Pfeiffer, effective as of October 25, 1990
(Exhibit 10.c.1.(xiii) to A&B's Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 1990).
(xvii) A&B Deferred Compensation Plan for Outside Directors (Exhibit
10.c.1.(xviii) to A&B's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1985).
(xviii) Amendment No. 1 to A&B Deferred Compensation Plan for Outside
Directors, effective October 27, 1988 (Exhibit 10.c.1.(xxix) to A&B's
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1988).
(xix) A&B Life Insurance Plan for Outside Directors (Exhibit
10.c.1.(xix) to A&B's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1985).
(xx) A&B Excess Benefits Plan, Amended and Restated effective February
1, 1995 (Exhibit 10.b.1.(xx) to A&B's Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1994).
(xxi) Amendment No. 1 to the A&B Excess Benefits Plan, dated June 26,
1997 (Exhibit 10.b.1.(xxxi) to A&B's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 1997).
(xxii) Amendment No. 2 to the A&B Excess Benefits Plan, dated December
10, 1997 (Exhibit 10.b.1.(xx) to A&B's Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1997).
63
(xxiii) Amendment No. 3 to the A&B Excess Benefits Plan, dated April 23,
1998 (Exhibit 10.b.1.(xxxv) to A&B's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 1998).
(xxiv) Amendment No. 4 to the A&B Excess Benefits plan, dated June 25,
1998 (Exhibit 10.b.1.(xxxvi) to A&B's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 1998).
(xxv) Amendment No. 5 to the A&B Excess Benefits Plan, dated December 9,
1998 (Exhibit 10.b.1.(xxii) to A&B's Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1998).
(xxvi) Amendment No. 6 to the A&B Excess Benefits Plan, dated October
25, 2000 (Exhibit 10.b.1.(xxviii) to A&B's Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000).
(xxvii) Restatement of the A&B Executive Survivor/Retirement Benefit
Plan, effective February 1, 1995 (Exhibit 10.b.1.(xxii) to A&B's Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994).
(xxviii) Amendment No. 1 to the A&B Executive Survivor/Retirement
Benefit Plan, dated October 25, 2000 (Exhibit 10.b.1.(xxx) to A&B's Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000).
(xxix) Restatement of the A&B 1985 Supplemental Executive Retirement
Plan, effective February 1, 1995 (Exhibit 10.b.1.(xxiv) to A&B's Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994).
(xxx) Amendment No. 1 to the A&B 1985 Supplemental Executive Retirement
Plan, dated August 27, 1998 (Exhibit 10.b.1.(xliii) to A&B's Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 1998).
(xxxi) Amendment No. 2 to the A&B 1985 Supplemental Executive Retirement
Plan, dated October 25, 2000 (Exhibit 10.b.1.(xxxiii) to A&B's Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2000).
(xxxii) Restatement of the A&B Retirement Plan for Outside Directors,
effective February 1, 1995 (Exhibit 10.b.1.(xxvi) to A&B's Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1994).
(xxxiii) Amendment No. 1 to the A&B Retirement Plan for Outside
Directors, dated August 27, 1998 (Exhibit 10.b.1.(xlii) to A&B's Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1998).
(xxxiv) Amendment No. 2 to the A&B Retirement Plan for Outside
Directors, dated October 25, 2000 (Exhibit 10.b.1.(xxxvi) to A&B's Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000).
(xxxv) Form of Severance Agreement entered into with certain executive
officers, as amended and restated effective August 24, 2000 (Exhibit
10.b.1.(xli) to A&B's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2000).
(xxxvi) Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. One-Year Performance Improvement
Incentive Plan, as restated effective October 22, 1992 (Exhibit
10.b.1.(xxi) to A&B's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1992).
(xxxvii) Amendment No. 1 to the Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. One-Year
Performance Improvement Incentive Plan, dated December 13, 2001.
(xxxviii) Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. Three-Year Performance Improvement
Incentive Plan, as restated effective October 22, 1992 (Exhibit
10.b.1.(xxii) to A&B's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1992).
(xxxix) Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan effective
August 25, 1994 (Exhibit 10.b.1.(xxv) to A&B's Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 1994).
(xl) Amendment No. 1 to the Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. Deferred
Compensation Plan, effective July 1, 1997 (Exhibit 10.b.1.(xxxii) to
A&B's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997).
(xli) Amendment No. 2 to the Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. Deferred
Compensation Plan, dated June 25, 1998 (Exhibit 10.b.1.(xxxvii) to A&B's
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998).
64
(xlii) Amendment No. 3 to the Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. Deferred
Compensation Plan, dated October 25, 2000 (Exhibit 10.b.1.(xliii) to
A&B's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000).
(xliii) Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. Restricted Stock Bonus Plan, as
restated effective April 28, 1988 (Exhi-bit 10.c.1.(xi) to A&B's Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1988).
(xliv) Amendment No. 1 to the Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. Restricted Stock
Bonus Plan, effective December 11, 1997 (Exhibit 10.b.1.(ii) to A&B's
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997).
(xlv) Amendment No. 2 to the Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. Restricted Stock
Bonus Plan, dated June 25, 1998 (Exhibit 10.b.1.(xxxviii) to A&B's Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998).
11. Statement re computation of per share earnings.
21. Subsidiaries.
21. Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. Subsidiaries as of February 14, 2002.
23. Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP dated March 11, 2002 (included as the
last page of A&B's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001).
D. Reports on Form 8-K
No reports on Form 8-K were filed during the quarter ended December 31, 2001.
65
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
ALEXANDER & BALDWIN, INC.
(Registrant)
Date: March 11, 2002
/s/ W. ALLEN DOANE
By_________________________________
W. Allen Doane, President
and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature Title Date
--------- ----- ----
/s/ W. ALLEN DOANE President and Chief March 11, 2002
- ----------------------------- Executive Officer and
W. Allen Doane Director
/s/ JAMES S. ANDRASICK Senior Vice President, March 11, 2002
- ----------------------------- Chief Financial Officer
James S. Andrasick and Treasurer
/s/ THOMAS A. WELLMAN Controller and March 11, 2002
- ----------------------------- Assistant Treasurer
Thomas A. Wellman
/s/ CHARLES M. STOCKHOLM Chairman of the Board March 11, 2002
- ----------------------------- and Director
Charles M. Stockholm
/s/ MICHAEL J. CHUN Director March 11, 2002
- -----------------------------
Michael J. Chun
/s/ LEO E. DENLEA, JR. Director March 11, 2002
- -----------------------------
Leo E. Denlea, Jr.
/s/ WALTER A. DODS, JR. Director March 11, 2002
- -----------------------------
Walter A. Dods, Jr.
/s/ CHARLES G. KING Director March 11, 2002
- -----------------------------
Charles G. King
66
Signature Title Date
--------- ----- ----
/s/ CARSON R. MCKISSICK Director March 11, 2002
- -----------------------------
Carson R. McKissick
/s/ C. BRADLEY MULHOLLAND Director March 11, 2002
- -----------------------------
C. Bradley Mulholland
/s/ LYNN M. SEDWAY Director March 11, 2002
- -----------------------------
Lynn M. Sedway
/s/ MARYANNA G. SHAW Director March 11, 2002
- -----------------------------
Maryanna G. Shaw
67
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements
33-31922, 33-31923, 33-54825, and 333-69197 of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. and
subsidiaries on Form S-8 of our report dated January 24, 2002, appearing in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. and subsidiaries for
the year ended December 31, 2001.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche, LLP
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Honolulu, Hawaii
March 11, 2002
68